taxonID	type	description	language	source
0387879BFFAAFFD6D3A2FA5AFC66962D.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♀♀ from the Canary Islands. 1 ♀, which appears to be the only surviving syntype, was found in the Collection générale of MNHN, but I am sure of its syntypic status and have transferred it to no. 356 of the Macquart collection. There was a label and a space for this species under no. 356, but no specimen had ever been there and it has always been thought that the types were lost (e. g., Hennig 1963 d: 948). The Canary Islands material worked on by Macquart is arranged in the order in which he dealt with the species in his report, and the specimens that survive all have a serial number in Macquart’s hand corresponding to the species-number in the report. Thus no. 372 in the box, Anthomyia quinquemaculata Macquart, is numbered “ 92 ” by Macquart and is species 92 in his report. Lucilia albofasciata was described by Macquart as no. 76, and this figure also appears in Macquart’s hand on the label of this specimen. This is the strongest possible evidence that this specimen is indeed a syntype. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. It lacks left mid tarsomeres 2 - 5 and right hind tarsomeres 2 - 5 but is otherwise in excellent condition. It is labelled by Macquart “ N. 76. / Lucilia / albofasciata ”. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Lucilia albofasciata is now placed in the genus Dasyphora Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 (Pont 1986 b: 105), and has been redescribed by Hennig (1963 d: 948).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFAAFFD6D3B5FCC4FF3B9024.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Macquart wrote: “ Limnophora aestivalis. — Anthomyia id. Meig. n °. 149 ”. Meigen’s “ no. 149 ” (Meigen 1826: 169) is actually Anthomyia aestiva, and so aestivalis is an unjustified replacement name. As this is a replacement name, Meigen’s types of aestiva are also the types of aestivalis. A rather mouldy ♀ was found in the Collection générale at MNHN, labelled by Macquart “ 310 bis ” and “ Limnophora / aestivalis? ”. This is Hydrotaea meteorica (Linnaeus, 1758). CURRENT IDENTITY. — The species aestiva Meigen is now placed in the genus Pegoplata Schnabl & Dziedzicki, 1911, and the name Limnophora aestivalis is included as a junior synonym of Pegoplata aestiva (Meigen, 1826) in the standard works (Bezzi & Stein 1907: 727; Séguy 1937: 74; Hennig 1968: 229; Dely-Draskovits 1993: 91).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFAAFFD9D1F1FC65FE5396FD.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There is 1 ♀ in MNHN, no. 983 of the Macquart collection, which was referred to as the holotype by Pont & Matile (1976: 743). This has to be interpreted as lectotype designation by inference, and it has been labelled accordingly. It was also seen by Villeneuve (1916: 513) and Patton (1923 b: 333). It is in excellent condition, with the accession no. 879.37 (Mauritius, collector Desjardins). It is labelled by Macquart “ N °. 71. / Musca / albomaculata. ”. With the lectotype, there are another 3 ♀♀, which have been shown by Pont & Matile (1976: 744) not to be part of the type series: all are from Mauritius, one collected by Desjardins (accession no. 4185.33) and two by Guérin-Méneville, but they do not agree with Macquart’s description and are actually Musca domestica subsp. domestica Linnaeus, 1758. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Musca albomaculata Macquart is a junior synonym of Musca xanthomelaena Wiedemann, 1830, as currently understood (Emden 1965: 74; Zielke 1971: 128). It has abdominal syntergite 1 + 2 broadly yellow laterally, with about the central quarter darkened,	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFAAFFD9D1F1FC65FE5396FD.taxon	description	FIG. 1. — Sample labels to illustrate Macquart’s handwriting and methodology: A, a new genus and species (“ Orthostylum rufipes. ♂, n. g., n. sp. Macq. ”); B, a later identification of Macquart’s own species, after publication of the 1851 supplement 4 (“ Limnophora rufipes ♀. Macq. 4 e S. ”); C, identification of a Fabricius species (“ Coenosia tigrina ♂. ”); D, a new species (“ Coenosia punctipennis ♂. Macq. n. sp ”). The labels come from specimens in OUMNH. Scale bar: 10 mm. and anterior postsutural dorsocentral setae minute, not distinct from the ground-setulae.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFA5FFD9D1E1FC48FB5093E1.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — The only surviving syntype was redescribed by Albuquerque (1951: 13 - 16, figs 26 - 29), who referred to it as the lectotype ♀ (op. cit.: 16). It is under no. 1864 of the Macquart collection in MNHN. It is in poor condition, being quite thickly covered with mould, and with antennae and right mid leg missing. It is labelled by Macquart “ Cyrtonevra / analis. ♀. / Macq. n. sp. ”, and also with a green disc with the accession number “ 15.43 ” on the reverse. This number refers to a collection from Chile sent to MNHN by Gay, and the species has nothing to do with the Australian fauna. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Albuquerque (loc. cit.) corrected Séguy’s (1937: 382) assignmentofthespeciesto Synthesiomyia Brauer & Bergenstamm, 1893, and placed it in the genus Graphomya Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830, where it is correctly located. His redescription and illustrations are supplemented by the recent key, description and illustrations by Marques & Couri (2007: 437 - 439, figs 1, 2, 22 - 28). I also studied the lectotype which, being a unique specimen, I inadvertently referred to as holotype (Pont 1967: 182), and clarified the confusion surrounding the various species of Muscidae described by Macquart with the specific epithet “ analis ”.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFA5FFD9D3A1FC35FE1893E1.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There is 1 ♀ syntype under no. 989 of the Macquart collection in MNHN. It has been partly eaten by beetle pests, but what remains is in good condition with the setae and dusting intact. The right anterior pleura, sides and venter of the abdomen are eaten away; right wing, left foretibia + tarsus, and all right legs missing. Labels include a dark green disc with “ 2901.40 ” on the reverse (Mauritius, collector Desjardins), and Macquart’s label “ Spilogaster / amoenus. ♀ / Macq. n. sp. ”. In 1998, I labelled it as lectotype, and the lectotype designation was formally published by Ackland (2001: 55). CURRENT IDENTITY. — Spilogaster amoenus belongs to the genus Anthomyia Meigen, 1803. Anthomyia amoena is the correct name for a species well-known and widespread in the Afrotropical region, including the Malagasy subregion, and it has recently been fully described and illustrated by Ackland (2001: 55 - 61, figs 123 - 132).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFA4FFD8D1F0FB09FCA893E1.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♂♂. Macquart (1850 c: 535, under Anthomyia) recorded this species as present in the MHNL collection. No syntypes have been located. The name is a “ sp. incert. sed. ” in the standard works (Bezzi & Stein 1907: 711, Chortophila; Séguy 1937: 75, Hylemyia; Hennig 1974 c: 920; Dely-Draskovits 1993: 99). CURRENT IDENTITY. — Macquart’s meagre description fits Botanophila striolata (Fallén, 1824) very well, and his name is herewith formally synonymized with Botanophila striolata (n. syn.).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFA4FFD8D3C6FF1BFDFA9616.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — The single syntype in MNHN was referred to by me as the holotype (Pont 1967: 182), and this has to be interpreted as lectotype fixation by inference. It is under no. 1862 of the Macquart collection. It is in poor condition: all legs are missing; antennae are missing and the head is damaged; most of the right wing is missing; the abdomen has been dissected by Séguy, and the terminalia mounted on a separate celluloid mount next to the lectotype. The labels include a green disc with the accession no. “ 670.37 ” on the reverse (Chile, collector Gay), and Macquart’s label “ N. 74 / Musca / analis. ”. CURRENT IDENTITY. — The lectotype possesses hairs on the proepisternal depression and Musca analis is thus a junior synonym of Musca domestica Linnaeus, 1758 (Pont 1967: 182; Carvalho et al. 2005: 26).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFA4FFD8D3C1FC48FBEF9724.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — I have previously discussed the MNHN material of this species (Pont 1967: 183). The lectotype is under no. 2404 of the Macquart collection. The lectotype lacks the right foreleg, but is otherwise in excellent condition. With it are the 9 ♂♂ and 10 ♀♀ paralectotypes designated with the lectotype. Further, non-typical, material has been moved to the Collection générale. 1 ♂ and 1 ♀ paralectotypes are in BMNH, received by exchange with MNHN in 1924. Macquart (1850 c: 534, as “ anolis ”) recorded this species as present in the MHNL collection. I found 1 ♂ and 1 ♀ syntypes in his collection in MHNL, which I have labelled as paralectotypes. They do not have the MNHN pink accession discs, but were presumably duplicates from the type-series retained by Macquart. They are labelled by him “ O. / analis. / Macq. Tasm. ”. In the Bigot collection in OUMNH, there are 6 ♂♂ and 5 ♀♀ of this species (Stein 1907 a: 210). One of the ♂♂ is labelled by Macquart “ Ophyra / analis. ♂ ♀ / Macq. n. sp. ”. However, as Macquart described this species from MNHN material and not from Bigot’s collection, and as in 1846 he was not yet employing the “ n. sp. ” rubric on labels for his newly-described species, I do not regard these as additional material from the type-series. Note that there also are specimens of O. analis in MNHN that are labelled by Macquart as “ n. sp. ” but which, according to their MNHN accession numbers, cannot have been syntypes. There is 1 ♀ from the Macquart collection in the USNM, exchanged with R. C. Shannon and acquired with his collection. It still has the MNHN disc with accession no. “ 4.46 ” (Tasmania, collector Verreaux), and is not a syntype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — The name analis is a junior synonym of Australophyra rostrata (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830) (see Pont 1973 b: 250). All the specimens discussed here belong to Australophyra rostrata.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFA4FFD8D012FD5AFC1C91D0.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Macquart described this species from “ De la Nouvelle Hollande, Nouvelle-Adélaïde? M. Bigot. ” The lectotype and paralectotype from Bigot’s collection, both ♀, are in the BMNH. The lectotype has the left mid leg missing but is otherwise in good condition. It is labelled by Macquart “ Pyrellia / analis / ♀. Macq. / Adélaïde? ”. CURRENT IDENTITY. — I have previously discussed this type (Pont 1973 b: 284), and have shown that it originates from Africa and that Pyrellia analis is a junior synonym of Pyrellina marsya (Walker, 1849).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFA7FFDBD3A6FF1BFEC89724.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♀♀. No syntypes have been located. It was listed as an unrecognized species in the standard works (Bezzi & Stein 1907: 736; Séguy 1937: 202; Hennig 1962 a: 618). CURRENT IDENTITY. — Macquart’s meagre description agrees well with Coenosia perpusilla Meigen, 1826, and his name has been synonymized with Coenosia perpusilla (Pont 1986 b: 210).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFA7FFDBD1FDFCB1FB4B9054.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of both sexes. No syntypes have been located. CURRENT IDENTITY. — The name has been synonymized with Muscina assimilis (Fallén, 1823) (now correctly called Muscina levida (Harris, 1780 )) in the standard works (Bezzi & Stein 1907: 613; Hennig 1962 d: 761; Pont 1986 b: 60), and there is no reason for disputing this.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFA7FFDBD3BBFD5AFE6F916A.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♀♀. No syntypes have been located. It was listed as an unrecognized species in the standard works (Bezzi & Stein 1907: 736; Séguy 1937: 202; Hennig 1962 a: 618). CURRENT IDENTITY. — Macquart’s meagre description agrees well with Coenosia femoralis (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830), and his name has been synonymized with Coenosia femoralis (Pont 1986 b: 204).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFA7FFDBD3A4FB9CFBF89678.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — The single syntype, under no. 1885 of the Macquart collection in MNHN, was designated as lectotype by Albuquerque (loc. cit.). It is in poor condition, being very dirty and with some mould; left wing damaged; right wing and both mid legs missing. It has the accession no. 670.37 (Chile, collector Gay), and is labelled by Macquart “ N °. 92. / Coenosia / annulipes. ”. CURRENT IDENTITY. — The species was assigned to the genus Austrocoenosia Malloch, 1934, by Albuquerque (loc. cit.), and it does indeed key to this genus, and to the species ignobilis Stein, 1911, in Malloch (1934: 209, 217). Comparison of the lectotype with specimens of ignobilis appeared to confirm this synonymy. In the first catalogue of South American Muscidae (Pont 1972: 42), the species annulipes together with ignobilis was included in the genus Coenosia Meigen, 1826, where Coenosia annulipes Macquart, 1843, is a junior secondary homonym of Anthomyia annulipes Macquart, 1835, and it was given the replacement name of Coenosia chilensis Pont, 1972. However, renewed study of the lectotype has shown that the species is correctly placed in the genus Neodexiopsis Malloch, 1920 (Couri & Albuquerque 1979: 506; Carvalho et al. 1993: 120, 121; 2005: 189), and Neodexiopsis annulipes (Macquart) is the valid available name for the species previously listed in the catalogues as Coenosia chilensis Pont. The hind femur in Coenosia has a dorsal and anterodorsal preapical seta, whilst in Neodexiopsis there is an additional posterodorsal preapical seta. In the lectotype of annulipes, both hind femora are partially obscured, by mould and by being pressed against the abdomen, but there appears to be a posterodorsal preapical seta. At some future time, it would be safest to remove one hind leg, macerate it, and check for the presence of setae or scars on the dorsal surface of the femur. The species ignobilis remains correctly placed in the genus Coenosia Meigen, 1826 (Carvalho et al. 2005: 182; Pont 2001: 473; Pont & Werner, 2006: 55).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFA7FFDAD1F2FA8AFEAC94D1.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♂♂ from Bigot’s collection. A ♂ is in that part of the Bigot collection now in the BMNH, and was earlier studied by Brauer (1899: 526). It is rather dirty and mouldy; the left wing is loose and most of the right wing is lost; antennae and both mid legs missing. It is labelled by Macquart “ Curtonevra / australis. ♂ / n. sp. Macq. / Tasmania ”, and stands over a Bigot drawer label reading “ C. Australis. ♂ / Tasman. Macq. ”. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — The lectotype is a ♂ of Muscina stabulans (Fallén, 1816), and this synonymy was recorded by Pont (1989 b: 676).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFA6FFDAD1FEFCE1FCA19054.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♀♀. No syntypes have been located. CURRENT IDENTITY. — The species is listed as an unrecognized species of Coenosia Meigen, 1826, in the standard works (e. g., Hennig 1962 a: 618; Pont 1986 b: 214). On re-studying Macquart’s meagre description, I think that this is most probably the ♀ of the species that he described as Caenosia testacea Macquart, 1835, from ♂♂ from Bordeaux and that it should, like Caenosia testacea, be assigned to the synonymy of Coenosia testacea (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830) (n. syn.).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFA6FFDAD3D8FE09FF1F9346.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — I have previously discussed the material of this species in MNHN (Pont 1967: 186). The lectotype is under no. 2391 of the Macquart collection, and there are 4 ♂♂ and 4 ♀♀ paralectotypes with it. The four localities mentioned by Macquart are all represented in this series: îles Salomon (Solomon Islands), Hobart-town (Tasmania), Viti (Fiji), and Vanoo (a misreading of Vavao = Vava’u islands, Tonga group, equidistant from Tongatapu and Fiji). The lectotype is rather dirty and mouldy, but all its parts are preserved. It has no accession number, but has a small printed “ 91 ” and a label in Le Guillou’s hand “ 12 – Musca / australis [deleted and “ oceanica ” inserted in pencil] ♂ M. / H: – Hobart-town ”. These nine specimens also form the type series of Musca oceanica Le Guillou, 1842, and the lectotype of australis has also been designated as the lectotype of oceanica (see Le Guillou 1842; Pont 1973 b: 170). In MHNL, in box G. 21 of the Macquart collection, there is 1 ♀ that apparently formed part of Macquart’s syntype series. It has no data or accession disc, but stands over the label “ M. australis / Léguillou Hobartstown ”. I have labelled it as a paralectotype of M. oceanica Le Guillou, 1842 and of M. australis Macquart, 1843. There are also 1 ♂ and 1 ♀ in BMNH from the Bigot collection, labelled by Macquart and studied by Brauer (1899: 527). These are not syntypes. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Musca australis is a species of Musca Linnaeus, 1758, with hairs on the proepisternal depression, and is a junior synonym of Musca domestica Linnaeus, 1758 (Pont 1973 b: 169; Pont 1989 b: 678). All the specimens discussed here are conspecific with the lectotype.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFA6FFDAD3D3F9F8FC8597A9.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — I have previously discussed the type-series of this species (Pont 1973 b: 203). The lectotype and 1 ♂ and 2 ♀♀ paralectotypes are in BMNH. The lectotype is rather mouldy; left hind leg, right mid tarsomeres, and right wing missing. It is labelled by Macquart “ Pyrellia / australis / ♂. ♀. nov. sp. ”. In MHNL, in box G. 21 of the Macquart collection, there is a label “ P. australis. / Nov. Holl. Bigot ”, but no specimen survives. In box G, there is a ♀ labelled “ P. / australis. / Macq. Nov. Hol. ”, which appears not to be a syntype; it is Pyrellia tasmaniae Macquart, 1846. CURRENT IDENTITY. — The lectotype and paralectotypes belong to a good species of the genus Neomyia Walker, 1859, redescribed (in the genus Orthellia Robineau- Desvoidy, 1863) in my revision of Australian Muscinae (Pont 1973 b: 202).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFA6FFDDD1ECFA8AFD60941C.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There is 1 ♀ syntype under no. 1861 of the Macquart collection. It has the accession no. 2573.33 (Brazil, collector Gaudichaud), and is labelled by Macquart “ 258. ” and “ basilaris. ”. It is rather dirty; right wing torn and loose; left mid and left hind tarsomeres, right hind tarsomeres 2 - 5, and abdomen missing. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — The lectotype has hairs on the proepisternal depression, and the name Musca basilaris is a junior synonym of Musca domestica Linnaeus, 1758 (see Pont 1972: 7; Carvalho et al. 1993: 17; 2005: 26). This synonymy was first given by Johnson (1919: 440).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFA1FFDDD3C2FB9CFDFE93E1.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — This was described from “ Brésil ”, from Bigot’s collection, and there is 1 ♀ syntype in that part of the Bigot collection in OUMNH. The body is damp and the right antenna missing, but otherwise it is in good condition. It is labelled by Macquart “ Aricia / bicolor / ♀. Macq ”. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Stein (1907 a: 214) redescribed the type and expressed doubts about its alleged Brazilian origin. In fact, it belongs to the subgenus Panaga Curran, 1928, of Dichaetomyia Malloch, 1921, an exclusively Afrotropical subgenus, and so the locality given by Macquart is clearly incorrect (Pont 1972: 60; 1980: 740). Dichaetomyia bicolor is apparently a good species, close to Dichaetomyia cuthbertsoni Emden, 1942.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFA1FFDDD3A8FE52FD6F916A.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♀♀. No syntypes have been located. In the Macquart collection in MHNL, in the penultimate (unnumbered) box, there is a single specimen labelled by Macquart “ A. basilaris / Mai. Lest. ” (Lest. = Lestrem, Macquart’s home town in northern France). This is not a syntype. It is very mouldy and quite unrecognizable though its size and general habitus are those of a species of Helina Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830, such as H. impuncta (Fallén, 1824). CURRENT IDENTITY. — The name was listed by Hennig (1974 a: 681) and Dely-Draskovits (1993: 89) as an unrecognizedspeciesofthegenus Pegomya Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830. Macquart’s brief description fits the common European Pegomya solennis (Meigen, 1826), a synonymy suggested to me by Dr V. Michelsen (pers. comm.), who has studied Meigen’s type. The name Pegomyia basilaris is herewith synonymized with Pegomya solennis (Meigen, 1826) (n. syn.).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFA1FFDDD1C0FF1BFBAA96E6.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♂♂. There is 1 ♂ syntype in box G. 22 of the Macquart collection in MHNL, over a Macquart label “ C. bimaculata / nob. / L. ” (“ L. ” is probably Lille). It is mouldy and has the right mid leg missing. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — The name bimaculata has usually been listed as an unrecognized species of Graphomya Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 (e. g., Bezzi & Stein 1907: 599; Hennig 1959: 239), but the description clearly indicates a species of Myospila Rondani, 1856. The lectotype has proved to be identical with, and an older name for, Myospila hennigi Gregor & Povolný, 1959 (Pont 1986 b: 159). Despite the mould on the head, it is possible to see that the arista is shorter plumose than in Myospila meditabunda (Fabricius, 1781), with the longest individual plumes equal to width of postpedicel; the discal row of setae on tergite 4 is not interrupted medially; and mid tibia has no anterodorsal and three posterodorsal setae (see Gregor 1968; Gregor et al. 2002: 153).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFA1FFDDD1F4FC18FC4293E1.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — As this is a replacement name, Robineau-Desvoidy’s types of aricioidea are also the types of binotata. Unfortunately, Robineau-Desvoidy’s types are known to have been destroyed, together with the bulk of his Palaearctic Diptera collection (Evenhuis et al. 2010: 233). CURRENT IDENTITY. — The name binotata (and aricioidea) was listed in Mydaea Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830, s. l., by Bezzi & Stein (1907: 636), but was omitted by Séguy (1937) and Hennig (1955 - 1964). Robineau-Desvoidy’s description of aricioidea (1830: 493) agrees very well with Helina impuncta (Fallén, 1824), except that the arista in impuncta is rather longer-haired than Robineau-Desvoidy states for his genus Helina (“ la chète, qui est à peine villosule, […] ”), but he may well have had a rubbed specimen before him and the other characters he mentions fit extremely well. Helina aricioidea Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830, and Spilogaster binotata Macquart, 1835 were therefore synonymized with Helina impuncta (Fallén, 1824) (Pont 1986 b: 143).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFA0FFDCD3D8FF1BFF439054.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Macquart described this species from ♀♀ in MNHN, Guérin-Méneville’s collection, and his own collection. His fig. 1, however, shows a ♂, and it is evident from the material in MNHN that Macquart considered the broad-fronted ♂♂ of this species to be ♀♀. There are 2 ♂♂ and 1 ♀ under no. 287 of the Macquart collection in MNHN. 1 ♂ has a disc with the accession no. 879.37, which refers to a collection made on Mauritius by Desjardins. This ♂ is in excellent condition, except for some missing tarsomeres on the mid leg. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. The ♀, which also has the accession no. 879.37, and the 2 nd ♂, which has an old disc “ Île / de France / Desjardin ” and is also labelled by Macquart “ nigrovittata ” (sic) (see Pont 1980: 738), have both been labelled as paralectotypes. There is no material in the Macquart collection in MHNL. In the Bigot collection in OUMNH, there are six specimens, which were studied by Stein (1906: 43, where he wrote that he had seen “ die aus Madagaskar stammende Type ”, 1907 a: 214). Although Bigot acquired some of the Guérin-Méneville Diptera collection, there is no evidence that any of these six specimens is a syntype: 1 ♂ is labelled “ I Maurice ”, 2 ♂♂ have no locality, 1 ♀ is labelled “ Madeg ”, 1 ♀ is labelled “ Nossi-Bé / Madag. ”, and 1 ♀ has no locality but is labelled by Macquart as “ Aricia / bivittata ”. CURRENT IDENTITY. — The three MNHN and six OUMNH specimens all belong to Alluaudinella bivittata (Macquart, 1843) in the sense of modern authors (e. g., Paterson 1960: 359; Couri et al. 2006: 807) to which Macquart’s original description and figures also clearly refer.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFA0FFDCD1D9FBCFFD1A93E1.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♂♂. No syntypes have been located. In the Collection générale in MNHN, I found a pin with the specimen destroyed, labelled by Macquart “ Anthomyia / brunnipennis ”, and also “ 328. ” and “ 20 juillet ”. This may well have been one of his syntypes. There is also a specimen labelled by Macquart “ brunnipennis ” and “ 300 ”. This does not agree with the original description, and is a ♂ of Mydaea affinis Meade, 1891. CURRENT IDENTITY. — This has been listed as an unrecognized species of Anthomyiidae Latreille, 1829, by Bezzi & Stein (1907: 712, Chortophila), Hennig (1976: 921) and Dely-Draskovits (1993: 99). The description fits very well the dark-bodied and rather dark-winged Pegoplata aestiva (Meigen, 1826), and Macquart’s name is herewith formally synonymized with Pegoplata aestiva (n. syn.).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFA0FFDCD1FFFD8DFC7E969B.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of unsexed specimens. No syntypes have been located. CURRENT IDENTITY. — This name has been treated as a junior synonym of Phaonia laeta (Fallén, 1823) (now correctly called Phaonia pratensis (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 )) in the standard works (Bezzi & Stein 1907: 620; Hennig 1963 b: 857; Pont 1986 b: 127), and there is no reason for disputing this.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFA0FFDCD3A8FA8AFCD69755.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Macquart described this species from an unspecified number of ♂♂, which were subsequently stated to be in his collection (Macquart 1843: 140 [1844: 297], “ de Java. Ma collection. ”). In box G. 21 of the Macquart collection in MHNL, there is a label for this species reading “ L. brevigaster. / nob. Java. ”. Over this, there is a long pin with the number “ 41 ”, but the specimen itself has been destroyed. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Aubertin (1933: 427) also did not see the type but she doubted whether this was a true Lucilia Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830. In my opinion, the description refers to a muscid greenbottle and can only be Neomyia timorensis (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830), a common Oriental species, and the name Lucilia brevigaster is formally synonymized with Neomyia timorensis (n. syn.). The name is not listed in the Catalog of the Diptera of the Oriental Region (Delfinado & Hardy 1977) because the calliphorid contributor, M. T. James, thought it was a species of Muscidae and I thought it was a species of Calliphoridae.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFA3FFDFD389FF1BFEF596FC.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♂♂. Macquart (1850 c: 533) recorded this species as present in the MHNL collection. One syntype has been located, in box F of the Macquart collection in MHNL. It was studied by Stein (1903: 294), and seen but not studied by Hennig (1962 c: 720, 1964 c: 1080). It has no data, but the drawer label reads “ H. / brunnipennis / Macq. Lille ”. It is rather damp; left foretarsomeres 3 - 5, right mid leg and right hind leg missing. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. There is 1 ♂ in OUMNH, which is labelled by Macquart “ Hydrotaea / brunnipennis / Macq. M ”. I have labelled this as paralectotype. It is in poor condition, very mouldy and with left foretibia + tarsus missing. CURRENT IDENTITY. — The name brunnipennis is usually treated as a junior synonym of Hydrotaea dentipes (Fabricius, 1805) (e. g., Bezzi & Stein 1907: 651; Hennig 1962 c: 720), and this synonymy can be confirmed from the lectotype. The paralectotype is Hydrotaea militaris (Meigen, 1826).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFA3FFDFD3A9F9DEFCD89755.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♂♂. No syntypes have been located. CURRENT IDENTITY. — The name has been listed as an unrecognized species of Anthomyiidae by Bezzi & Stein (1907: 712), Hennig (1976: 921) and Dely- Draskovits (1993: 99). The slightly projecting facial edge and the cinereous body-colour suggest that Macquart’s species is the same as Delia platura (Meigen, 1826), and the name Chortophila caesia is herewith formally synonymized with Delia platura (Meigen, 1826) (n. syn.)	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFA3FFDFD1F9FD8DFB4B911F.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♂♂. No syntypes have been located. CURRENT IDENTITY. — The name has been synonymized with Hydrophoria conica (Wiedemann, 1817) (now correctly called Hydrophoria lancifer (Harris, 1780 )) by Bezzi & Stein (1907: 685), Hennig (1969 a: 272) and Dely-Draskovits (1993: 61), and I can see no reason for not accepting this synonymy.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFA3FFDFD38AFC32FEE090A8.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Macquart gave a description of this species with the name “ Morellia horticola, Rob. D. No. 2. ” as a synonym, but gave no reason for replacing Robineau-Desvoidy’s name. The types of horticola are also the types of caerulescens, but Robineau-Desvoidy’s material is known to have been destroyed (Evenhuis et al. 2010: 233). CURRENT IDENTITY. — The names caerulescens and horticola are both placed as junior synonyms of Morellia hortorum (Fallén, 1817) (Hennig 1964 a: 969; Pont 1986 b: 95), and there is no reason for not accepting this synonymy.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFA3FFDFD1EBFB53FBFF93E1.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♂♂. No syntypes have been located. CURRENT IDENTITY. — This name was listed as an unrecognized species of Anthomyiidae by Bezzi & Stein (1907: 689), Hennig (1976: 921) and Dely- Draskovits (1993: 99). Macquart’s description of the scutal and abdominal pattern, the black legs and the brownish-seamed crossveins (“ nervures transversales des ailes bordées de brunâtre ”) identifies this species with Anthomyia liturata (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830), and the name Hylemyia caesia Macquart, 1835, is herewith formally synonymized with Anthomyia liturata (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830) (n. syn.).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFA2FFDED3D5F9E1FBD297C2.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♀♀. Macquart (1850 c: 535) recorded this species as present in the MHNL collection, but no syntypes have been located, as was reported by Griffiths (1993: 1581). 1 ♀ was found amongst miscellaneous Macquart material in MNHN, labelled by Macquart “ N °. 93. / Anthomyia / cana ”, but this is actually the specimen recorded by Macquart (1839: 117) from the Canary Islands and not a syntype. It is Delia cilitarsis Hennig, 1974 (Michelsen & Baez 1985: 293). CURRENT IDENTITY. — The name has been synonymized with Delia platura (Meigen, 1826) (syn: cilicrura (Rondani, 1866 )) by Bezzi & Stein (1907: 713, with hesitation), Hennig (1974 c: 881) and Dely-Draskovits (1993: 48), and this synonymy appears to be correct.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFA2FFDED1F4FD77FBF3903D.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from both sexes from material in MNHN collected by Gay. There are 2 ♂♂ and 2 ♀♀ syntypes in the Macquart collection, under no. 1882. Each one has a disc with the accession no. 670.37, which refers to a collection from Chile received from Gay. 1 ♂ is labelled by Macquart “ N °. 89. / Anthomyia / chilensis. ”. It is rather mouldy but is otherwise well preserved. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. The 2 nd ♂ has been labelled “ canicularis ” by Séguy and “ Fannia ” by Albuquerque; this ♂ and the 2 ♀♀ have been labelled as paralectotypes. In OUMNH there is 1 ♂ in the Bigot collection over the label “ H. chilensis. ♂ / Anthom. id. Macq. / Chili (Buen. Ayres) J. Bigot. ”. This is not a syntype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — All four syntypes are Fannia canicularis (Linnaeus, 1761), and the synonymy of Anthomyia chilensis with Fannia canicularis given by Stein (1919: 131) can be confirmed (see also Carvalho et al. 2003: 10). As pointed out by Stein (1907 a: 216), the OUMNH ♂ is also F. canicularis.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFA2FFDED3B7FC7FFD6190A8.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There is 1 ♂ syntype in the Macquart collection in MNHN, under no. 1893. Macquart probably described it as a ♀ because of the dichoptic head, but it belongs to the genus Fucellia Robineau-Desvoidy, 1841, in which all the ♂♂ are dichoptic. It is a little immature, but is otherwise well preserved. It has an old hand-written label “ 34 ” and the accession no. 124.38 (Chile, collector Pissis). It is labelled by Macquart “ Scatophaga / calcarata [sic] / ♀. Macq. n. sp. ”. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — This is a very characteristic species of Fucellia (Pont 1974 a: 5). The ♂ hind tibia has been illustrated by Malloch (1934: fig. 28), and the head and hind tibia of the lectotype were illustrated by Séguy (1952: 8, fig. 3).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFA2FFDED3D1FF1BFE2A96CB.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♂♂. No syntypes have been located. There is 1 ♂ in MNHN labelled by Macquart as “ N °. 81. / Spilogaster / caesia. ”. This is a species of Helina Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830, but does not agree with his description of this species. CURRENT IDENTITY. — The name caesia was widely used in the 19 th century for the species now known as Helina confinis (Fallén, 1825) (syn: anceps (Zetterstedt, 1838 )), but both Bezzi & Stein (1907: 635) and Hennig (1957: 159) showed some hesitation in synonymizing true caesia with this species. In my opinion, Macquart’s description of caesia refers to the common European species Helina reversio (Harris, 1780) (syn: duplicata (Meigen, 1826 )), and this synonymy has been published (Pont 1986 b: 149). The species described by Macquart as duplicata a few lines before caesia has “ pieds noirs ” and cannot therefore be reversio. However, in his description of caesia, Macquart mentions “ pieds noirs; jambes quelquefois d’un testacé noirâtre ”, which fits reversio exactly.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFA2FFC1D1CEFA74FE909770.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — This is another species described from Chilean material sent to MNHN by Gay. The only known syntype has been destroyed: in the Macquart collection in MNHN under no. 1881, there is a pin with labels but the specimen itself is no longer there. The labels comprise the locality “ Coquimbo ”, the accession no. 15.43 (Chile, collector Gay), and Macquart’s label “ Chortophila / chilensis / ♀. Macq. n. sp. ”. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Macquart’s brief description gives sufficient detail (e. g., “ pieds noirs, à jambes brunes ”) for this to be recognized as a clear-winged species of Anthomyia Meigen, 1803 (Pont 1974 a: 3, under Craspedochaeta [sic] Macquart, 1851) rather than a species of Delia Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFBDFFC1D3DBFDA7FE3A911F.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There is 1 ♂ syntype under no. 1860 of the Macquart collection in MNHN. It is rather dirty and has the right hind tarsomeres missing, but is otherwise well preserved. It has the accession no. 670.37 (Chile, collector Gay), and is labelled by Macquart “ N °. 75. / Musca / chilensis ”. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — The lectotype is a ♂ of Musca domestica Linnaeus, 1758, and this synonymy has been recorded by Stein (1919: 103), Pont (1972: 7) and Carvalho et al. (1993: 17; 2005: 26).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFBDFFC1D1F3FD8DFC3890C2.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from both sexes from material in Bigot’s collection, and the syntypes are in that part of the collection now in the BMNH. Emden (1965: 128) designated one of the ♀♀ syntypes as lectotype in order to fix the identity of the name and to use it for an Oriental species of Orthellia Robineau-Desvoidy, 1863 (now Neomyia Walker, 1859). Brauer (1899: 525) had briefly studied the syntypes, but they were studied in more detail by Aubertin (1932: 141, 144; 1933: 428), who recognized that they belonged to two distinct species of Neomyia. The lectotype is in good condition, with the left mid tibia + tarsus and right hind leg missing. It has no Macquart label, but stands over Bigot’s cabinet label “ S. coeruleifrons. ♂ [and ♀.] / Lucilia. id. M. / Java. Molucc. Macq. ”. A further 6 ♂♂ and 4 ♀♀ syntypes have been located in the BMNH, and have been labelled as paralectotypes. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Neomyia coeruleifrons is a good species of Neomyia Walker (Emden 1965: 120, 127, as Orthellia). Of the 10 paralectotypes, 1 ♀ is conspecific with the lectotype, whilst 6 ♂♂ and 3 ♀♀ belong to Neomyia timorensis (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830). One of these “ timorensis ” ♀♀ has Macquart’s label “ Lucilia / coeruleifrons / ♀. Macq. n. sp. ”.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFBDFFC1D3D5FB53FCD59755.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from both sexes from a collection from Chile sent to MNHN by Gay. Séguy (1938: 114) wrote that the type was lost, but there are 1 ♂ and 1 ♀ syntypes under no. 1874 of the Macquart collection. The ♂ has the accession no. 670.37 (Chile, collector Gay), and has also been labelled by Macquart “ N °. 82. / Ophyra / coerulea ”. It is rather dirty, with left mid tarsomeres missing. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. The ♀, which has the accession no. 835.36 (Chile, collector Gay), has been labelled as paralectotype. In the Bigot collection in OUMNH, there are 16 specimens under the name Ophyra coerulea from Cape Horn and Buenos Aires (Stein 1907 a: 215; 1911: 73): none is a syntype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Both syntypes are conspecific, and belong to the species Psilochaeta chalybea (Wiedemann, 1830), a synonymy first established by Stein (1902: 130). The lectotype has the frons much broader than the width of postpedicel, a character used by Malloch (1934: 314) and Carvalho (1989 c: 487) for distinguishing P. chalybea from the closely related P. pampeana Shannon & del Ponte, 1926. I have redetermined the OUMNH specimens as Psilochaeta chalybea (Wiedemann, 1830) (5 ♂♂, 4 ♀♀), Brachygasterina violaceiventris Macquart, 1851 (3 ♀♀), and Myospila cyanea (Macquart, 1843) (4 ♀♀).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFBDFFC0D1F2FA74FDE196CB.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There are 3 ♂♂ syntypes under no. 2400 of the Macquart collection in MNHN. Albuquerque (1950 b: 1, 2) synonymized this name with Aricia viridiventris Macquart, 1846 (see below), and apparently considered the syntypes of coeruleigaster and viridiventris as one series, as he wrote (under viridiventris): “ lectótipos ♂ e ♀ e 1 ♂ e 2 ♀♀ paralectótipos ”. This is not a valid lectotype designation for either name since neither is fixed to one particular specimen. 1 ♂ syntype is labelled by Macquart “ Aricia / coeruleigaster / ♂. Macq. n. sp. ”, and has the accession no. 2.47 (Australia, collector Verreaux). It is in good condition, with left arista, left mid tarsomeres 4 - 5, and right mid leg missing. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. The other 2 ♂♂ have been labelled as paralectotypes. One has the accession no. 4.46, and the head and right mid leg are missing; the other has the accession no. 13.44 and is rather mouldy, with antennae and several legs missing. These two accession numbers refer to collections made in Tasmania by Verreaux. CURRENT IDENTITY. — The lectotype belongs to a species of Helina Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830, close to H. hirtibasis Malloch, 1923, and Aricia coeruleigaster is a junior synonym of Helina viridiventris (Macquart, 1846) (Albuquerque 1950 b: 1; Pont 1989 b: 686). Its essential characters were listed by Albuquerque (loc. cit.). One paralectotype is conspecific, but the headless paralectotype is probably another species.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFBCFFC0D38EFC7EFCBE946B.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Macquart described this species from material collected by Guyon, without stating the location. Other Guyon material survives in his personal collection in MHNL, but I found no specimens of constantina there. The syntypes are therefore presumed to have been destroyed. It should be noted that although Macquart described this species from the ♀ sex, his fig. 6 shows a ♂ head on a ♀ body. In the Macquart collection in MNHN under no. 238, there is a ♀ fragment identified by Macquart as constantina. This cannot be part of the type-series since it was collected by Lucas, not by Guyon, and in fact it is part of the material subsequently recorded from Algeria by Macquart (1849: 492). CURRENT IDENTITY. — Anthomyia constantina has been treated as a junior synonym of Fannia canicularis (Linnaeus, 1761) in the standard works (Bezzi & Stein 1907: 657; Hennig 1955 a: 33; Pont 1986 a: 46), and there is no reason to dispute this synonymy. Although only a fragment, the Lucas ♀ has a typical Fannia head and has the fronto-orbital setulae descending down on to the parafacial; there is little doubt that it too is a ♀ of Fannia canicularis.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFBCFFC0D1F6FE9EFB6D96CB.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — As this is a replacement name, Robineau-Desvoidy’s types of cinerea are also the types of cuprea. Robineau-Desvoidy’s collection is largely destroyed, and his types of cinerea no longer exist (Evenhuis et al. 2010: 233). CURRENT IDENTITY. — The name cinerea (and cuprea) is listed as an unrecognized species of Anthomyiidae by Bezzi & Stein (1907: 714), Hennig (1976: 921) and Dely-Draskovits (1993: 99). It seems to me, however, that cinerea, like the following two species described by Robineau-Desvoidy (albipennis and flavescens), is the same as Adia cinerella (Fallén, 1825), and I herewith formally synonymize the names Nerina cinerea and Chortophila cuprea with Adia cinerella (Fallén, 1825) (n. syn.).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFBCFFC0D017FC7EFCD09009.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♀♀. No syntypes have been located. CURRENT IDENTITY. — The name Musca cuprea has been synonymized with Musca tempestiva Fallén, 1817, in the standard works (Bezzi & Stein 1907: 604; Hennig 1964 b: 1025; Pont 1986 b: 93), and there is no reason to dispute this.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFBCFFC3D1F2FA40FE3497C3.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from both sexes. There is 1 ♂ in box G. 22 of the Macquart collection in MHNL, over the label “ M. curvipes, n. / L. ” (“ L. ” is probably Lille). It is rather dirty and has some mould, and the right hind leg is missing. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. A 2 nd ♂ syntype was found, among the miscellaneous Macquart material in MNHN. It is labelled by Macquart “ 274. ” and “ curvipes. ”. It is much damaged by beetle attack. I have labelled it as paralectotype. Brauer & Bergenstamm (1891: 426) reported on a “ type ” in NMW, but it seems highly unlikely that their specimen could have been a syntype and their use of the term “ type ” should be interpreted as “ a typical specimen ”. CURRENT IDENTITY. — The lectotype and paralectotype are conspecific with Morellia aenescens Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830, as stated by Bezzi & Stein (1907: 600), Hennig (1964 a: 966) and Pont (1986 b: 94).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFBFFFC3D38AFA40FCD897A8.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There is 1 ♂ syntype under no. 1870 of the Macquart collection in MNHN. It has the accession no. 15.43 (Chile, collector Gay), and has been labelled by Macquart “ Hydrotoea / cyaneiventris / ♂. Macq. n. sp ”. It is in very poor condition. At one time, it must have become detached from its pin, and it has been gummed to a piece of card: it is dirty and with some mould; most of the scutum has been destroyed and much of the left wing has also gone; the abdomen is very squashed and distorted; as it is mounted on its side it is difficult to see precisely which legs are missing, but apparently the left three legs are present and the right three are missing. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Hydrotoea cyaneiventris is indeed a species of Hydrotaea Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830, as is shown by the characteristic ♂ fore femoral ornamentation, and with its dark metallic colour and dark calypters it has apparently been correctly interpreted by subsequent authors (e. g., Malloch 1934: 301; Palka-Rocha & Carvalho 1994: 5 - 7, figs 1, 5, 9, 13, 18, 23). Séguy (1937: 304) redescribed the type, but synonymized it incorrectly with the European H. cyrtoneurina (Zetterstedt, 1845).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFBFFFC3D1C4FCE1FB909027.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — The single surviving syntype is rather mouldy; left foreleg, left mid leg, right foretarsomeres 2 - 5, and right mid tarsomeres 2 - 5 missing. It is labelled by Macquart “ Hydrotea / cyaneiventris / ♂. Macq. ” and stands over the Bigot drawer label “ H. cyaneiventris. ♂. / Austral. (Adelaïde) Macq. ”. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. It was lent by Verrall to Stein in 1907, according to a note in Verrall’s MS list of the Diptera in the Bigot collection. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Hydrotea cyaneiventris is a junior synonym of Australophyra rostrata (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830), as established by Stein (1907 b: 273, as Ophyra analis Macquart, 1846) and Pont (1973 b: 250).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFBFFFC3D3A6FD76FDF49009.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from both sexes from Concepción in Chile, from material sent to MNHN by Gay and Dumont-Durville. There are 2 syntypes in MNHN, under no. 1863 of the Macquart collection. The ♂ has the accession no. 670.37, the number for a collection from Chile sent by Gay. It is rather mouldy; right antenna and left wing missing. It is labelled by Macquart “ N °. 78. / Curtonevra / cyanea. ”. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. The ♀ has the data “ Concept. / (Chili) / Durv. ” written on an accessions disc, and also the number “ 80 ”. It is also mouldy, and lacks left hind leg. I have labelled it as paralectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Both specimens are conspecific and belong to a good species of the genus Myospila Rondani, 1856. Myospila cyanea (Macquart, 1843) has been correctly interpreted by Snyder (1940: 6) and Lopes & Reis (1991: 187, figs 1, 4, 7, 10).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFBFFFC2D1EEFA5AFDB39724.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Under no. 974 of the Macquart collection in MNHN, there is 1 ♀ labelled by Macquart as “ cyaniceps ”. This is a manuscript name that was never published by Macquart, but it was mentioned by Séguy (1933) in his key to world Orthellia Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 (now correctly called Neomyia Walker, 1859). The name must therefore be attributed to Séguy. Séguy mentions both ♂ and ♀ characters in his key couplet for O. cyaniceps, and so the ♀ in the Macquart collection can only be a syntype. No ♂ has been located. I have labelled and designate herewith this ♀ as lectotype. It is rather mouldy, but all parts are present except for a few tarsomeres. It has a turquoise accessions disc with the number 4112.33, which refers to a collection from La Réunion made by Bréon. CURRENT IDENTITY. — This is a specimen of Neomyia viridifrons (Macquart, 1843), and Orthellia cyaniceps is a junior synonym of this name (Pont 1980: 729).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFBEFFC2D3B9FD5AFF3B908D.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from material in Bigot’s collection, and the only surviving syntype is in that part of the Bigot collection now in the BMNH. It is in appalling condition, being completely covered in mould so that virtually nothing of the colour and bristling can be seen; three legs are missing, but it is impossible to tell which they are. It is labelled by Macquart “ Cyrtonevra / cylindrica. ♂ / Macq. n. sp. ”, and stands over Bigot’s drawer label “ C. cylindrica. ♂. / Brazil. Macq. ”. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Brauer (1899: 526) was unable to place it to genus. It appears to belong to Cyrtoneurina Giglio-Tos, 1893 (Pont 1972: 52; Carvalho et al. 1993: 50; 2005: 79), but I have been quite unable to identify it specifically. The only possibility of resolving its identity was for the next reviser of Cyrtoneurina to remove it from its pin and macerate the remains, comparing structure and terminalia with the other known species. In fact, during a study visit to the BMNH, Dr Denise Pamplona removed and macerated the abdomen, storing it in a microvial of glycerine. However, the results of this study have not yet been published.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFBEFFC2D3A1F9C5FCF894BF.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There is 1 ♂ under no. 1879 of the Macquart collection in MNHN. It has a disc with the locality “ Malouines ”, and Macquart’s label “ N °. 87. / Chortophila / dasyops. ”. The right mid leg and both hind legs are missing, but otherwise the condition is good. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Chortophila dasyops is a good species in the genus Helina Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 (Carvalho et al. 2005: 112). It was redescribed by Malloch (1928: 472).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFBEFFC2D1C2FDF3FB77911F.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from the ♂ sex, and there are 3 ♂♂ syntypes in the Macquart collection in MNHN, under no. 995. They were redescribed by Albuquerque (1950 c: 4, 5, figs 11 - 15), who also designated a lectotype and two paralectotypes. The lectotype lacks the left foreleg and both mid legs, but is otherwise in good condition. It has an old label “ Île de Fr. / Desjardins ”, and has been labelled by Macquart “ N °. 90 / Anthomyia / desjardinsii ”. CURRENT IDENTITY. — All three are conspecific, and the name Anthomyia desjardinsii is a junior synonym of Gymnodia gentilis (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830), as defined by Emden (1951: 470, 473) (see Pont 1980: 733).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFBEFFC5D1E2FB53FEFB9401.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♀♀. There are 2 ♂♂ and 1 ♀ syntypes under no. 994 of the Macquart collection in MNHN. Macquart’s mistake in sexing these specimens is easily understood as ♂♂ of the genus Lispe Latreille, 1797 are dichoptic and were frequently mis-sexed by 19 th century workers. Each syntype has a greenish disc with the accession no. 2901.40 (Mauritius, collector Desjardins), and 1 ♂ is labelled by Macquart “ Lispe / Desjardinsii / ♀. Macq. n. sp. ”. This ♂ lacks the right mid leg and has a little mould on the head and legs, otherwise it is in good condition. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. The other ♂ and the ♀ have been labelled as paralectotypes. CURRENT IDENTITY. — All three syntypes are conspecific, and Lispe desjardinsii is the oldest name for the species previously known as Lispe remipes Becker, 1913 (see Pont 1980: 751).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFB9FFC5D3D6FB20FEE993E6.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♀♀. No syntypes have been located. CURRENT IDENTITY. — The name has been treated as a synonym of Phaonia variegata (Meigen, 1826) (now called Phaonia subventa (Harris, 1780 )) in the standard works (Bezzi & Stein 1907: 625; and Hennig 1963 c: 888, both with some doubt; Pont 1986 b: 130). Macquart’s description fits this species very well, and there seems no reason for doubting this synonymy.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFB9FFC5D1E9FF1BFCE797A9.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — As this is a replacement name for hylemyoidea, the types of hylemyoidea are also the types of dispar. However, most of Robineau-Desvoidy’s collection is known to have been destroyed (Evenhuis et al. 2010: 233), and hylemyoidea is not present in the remnants in MNHN. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Bezzi & Stein (1907: 686), Hennig (1969 a: 275) and Dely-Draskovits (1993: 97) have tentatively synonymized Hylemyia dispar and Zaphne hylemyoidea with Zaphne divisa (Meigen, 1826), and as there is nothing in Robineau-Desvoidy’s description to contradict these synonymies, they are formally confirmed herewith.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFB9FFC5D3A0FEB9FF4A91EE.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from both sexes from material in MNHN. Under no. 981 of the Macquart collection in MNHN there is a label for this species but no specimens or even pin-holes, and the syntypes are therefore presumed to have been destroyed. In box G. 21 of the Macquart collection in MHNL, there is a label reading “ P. desjardinsii. Port Natal. ” but no specimen. However, this specimen could not have been a syntype because of its South African origin. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Pyrellia desjardinsii has been listed as an unrecognized species of Neomyia Walker, 1859 (Pont 1980: 728, as Orthellia). Only two species of Neomyia are known from Mauritius: N. viridifrons Macquart, 1843 (boersiana Bigot, 1877) and N. albigena Stein, 1913, both of which are widespread on mainland Africa and also on Madagascar. Macquart’s description is insufficiently detailed to be able to make a positive identification of his species, but to maintain nomenclatural stability, I propose to treat Pyrellia desjardinsii as a junior synonym of Neomyia viridifrons Macquart, 1843 (n. syn.). See also the discussion below under Lucilia viridifrons Macquart, 1843.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFB9FFC4D1EEFCE1FF1B97C2.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from both sexes, collected by Bigot. In the Bigot collection in OUMNH there are 2 ♂♂ and 2 ♀♀ syntypes. Macquart’s mistake in sexing these specimens is easily understood as ♂♂ of the genus Lispe Latreille, 1797 are dichoptic and were frequently mis-sexed by 19 th century workers. The 2 ♂♂ actually represent two different species, but it is not possible to decide which of these was used by Macquart as the basis for his description: this is sufficiently imprecise to apply to either of them. Stein’s (1907 b: 274) redescriptive notes could also apply to either specimen. I have labelled and designate herewith the ♂ without a head as lectotype. This agrees slightly better with Macquart’s statement “ thorax à bandes noires, étroites ” than does the 2 nd ♂. This 2 nd ♂ and the 2 ♀♀ have been labelled as paralectotypes. The lectotype is in good condition apart from the missing head. The ♂ paralectotype lacks the left hind leg; the abdomen has been removed by me and the terminalia dissected; these are in a small vial of glycerine pinned with the specimen. 1 ♀ paralectotype is labelled by Macquart “ Lispe / dissimilis / ♂ ♀. Macq. n. sp. ”. Bigot’s drawer label reads “ L. dissimilis. ♀. / Egyptus. / Macq. ”. In addition to these four specimens, the OUMNH series includes 1 ♂ and 1 ♀ labelled “ Maroc. ” by Bigot. These are not syntypes. In MHNL, there is also a specimen without abdomen or hind legs in box F of the Macquart collection, with the label “ L. / dissimilis / Macq. Egypte ”. This was recorded by Macquart (1850 c: 534) as present in the MHNL collection. I have labelled it as paralectotype. There is no material in MNHN. CURRENT IDENTITY. — The lectotype has been labelled by J. E. Collin as Lispe nuba Wiedemann, 1830, and this identification is correct. The name Lispe dissimilis has been treated as a junior synonym of L. nuba in the standard works (Stein 1919: 142; Hennig 1960 b: 448; Pont 1986 b: 189). The OUMNH paralectotype ♂ is Lispe assimilis Wiedemann, 1824, as defined by Shinonaga & Pont (1992: 718). The 2 ♀♀ paralectotypes and the MHNL ♂ are Lispe nuba; the Morocco ♂ and ♀ in OUMNH are Lispe assimilis.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFB8FFC4D3D8F9DEFC599647.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♀♀. No syntypes have been located. CURRENT IDENTITY. — This species was included as an unrecognized species of Coenosia Meigen, 1826, by Bezzi & Stein (1907: 738) and Hennig (1962 a: 618). The description is the same in all respects to that of the preceding species Coenosia monilis Meigen, 1826, and it seems to me that Macquart did not in fact recognize Meigen’s species in his own material, that he gave a selection of characters from Meigen’s description (translated verbatim into French) as his own description, and that he then redescribed the species as dubia. The synonymy of Macquart’s name with Anthomyia monilis (Meigen, 1826) was established by Pont (1986 b: 215) and was accepted by Dely-Draskovits (1993: 21).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFB8FFC4D1F5FCFBFC70908D.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There is 1 ♂ syntype under no. 1877 of the Macquart collection in MNHN. It has the accession no. 2896.34, which refers to a collection made in America by Leprieur, an old hand-written label “ 308. ”, and Macquart’s label “ elegans. ”. The pin has broken, and it has been re-mounted on a polyporous strip; it is rather matt and dusty; right antenna, left arista, left foreleg, and right mid tarsus missing; right hind leg gummed to the mount. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Limnophora elegans belongs to the genus Limnophora Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830, and is listed as a valid species in this genus (Pont 1972: 28; Carvalho et al. 1993: 96; 2005: 152). It has the prosternum setulose, base of vein R 4 + 5 setulose, vein R 1 bare, four postsutural dorsocentral setae, mid tibia with two posterior setae.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFB8FFC4D3B9FD77FECF90A8.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — As discussed by Pont & Matile (1976: 745), there are 3 ♂♂ and 3 ♀♀ syntypes in the Macquart collection in MNHN, under no. 984. The ♂ lectotype is in good condition, lacking the right mid leg. It is labelled by Macquart “ N °. 70. / Musca / dorsomaculata. ”. In addition to these six specimens, there were two specimens (1 ♂ and 1 ♀) in the series that were not syntypes and which belong to Musca domestica subsp. domestica Linnaeus, 1758. In box G. 21 of the Macquart collection in MHNL, there is 1 ♀ standing over the label “ M. dorsomaculata / M.? P. isle de fr. ”. This is presumably a duplicate from the type-series retained by Macquart, and I have labelled it as a paralectotype. It is in poor condition. CURRENT IDENTITY. — The lectotype and six paralectotypes are conspecific, and belong to Musca xanthomelaena Wiedemann, 1830, as currently understood (Emden 1965: 74; Zielke 1971: 128). The lectotype has abdominal syntergite 1 + 2 dark on median third and broadly yellow laterally; anterior postsutural dorsocentral setae minute; upper inner eye facets strongly enlarged, and frons at narrowest point much narrower than diameter of anterior ocellus.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFB8FFC7D1E7F9C5FEA597D9.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — In his study of the Macquart types in Bigot’s collection, Brauer (1899: 526, no. 242) commented upon “ Cyrtoneura elliptica Mcq. Europa? = Anthracomyia ead. n.? = melanoptera Fll. (olim Morinia n.) ”. So far as I can establish, Macquart never published a name elliptica. The specimen in question, a ♀ lacking head, left foreleg and both mid legs, is in OUMNH. It is labelled by Macquart “ Cyrtonevra / elliptica ♀ / n. sp. Macq. ”. Bigot’s drawer label reads: “ C. [yrtoneura, expanded by Collin] elliptica. ♀. / n. sp. Inedict. / Europ?. Macq. ” A small handwritten tag reads “ Font ” and may refer to a locality such as Fontainebleau. CURRENT IDENTITY. — The name must be attributed to Brauer. Published in synonymy, it has never been made available. Although the genus Curtonevra Macquart, 1834, belongs to the Muscidae, C. elliptica is a synonym of Morinia melanoptera (Fallén, 1816) (Rhinophoridae) (Herting 1993: 104).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFBBFFC7D3BAFD11FE579073.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♂♂. No syntypes have been located. Hennig (1963 d: 951) also reported that there were no syntypes in MHNL. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Lucilia eriophthalma is placed in synonymy with Eudasyphora cyanella (Meigen, 1826) (Hennig 1963 d: 950, as Dasyphora; Pont 1986 b: 104). Zimin (1951: 186) used the name for a species of Eudasyphora Townsend, 1911, closely related to E. cyanella, but Hennig (loc. cit.) has shown that this species is found only in upland areas of Central Europe and is most unlikely to have occurred around Lille. He treated eriophthalma as a synonym of cyanella, and for the second species (eriophthalma sensu Zimin) proposed the name Dasyphora zimini Hennig, 1963.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFBBFFC7D1C5FCFBFC3190C2.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from Bigot’s collection; Bigot himself (1858: 370) gave a redescription of the species. 1 ♂ syntype is now in the BMNH, where it was seen by Emden (1939: 70). It is labelled by Macquart “ Pyrellia / flavicalyptrata / ♂. Macq. ”, and stands over the Bigot drawer label “ P. flavicalyptrata. / ♂. Macq. ”. The condition is generally poor; it is mouldy, and left foretarsomeres 2 - 5 are missing. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Pyrellia flavicalyptrata is a junior synonym of Neomyia nudissima (Loew, 1852) as currently understood (Zielke 1971: 161, as Orthellia; Pont 1980: 728). When placed in Neomyia Walker, 1859, it becomes a junior secondary homonym of Lucilia (now Neomyia) flavicalyptrata Macquart, 1848.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFBBFFC7D3B4FAA7FB909647.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from the collection of M. Payen, curator of the then municipal museum of Tournai, and the ♂ syntype was located in MHNT by the late Dr J. Verbeke of IRSNB who sent it to me for study. It is damp but is otherwise well preserved, and fits Macquart’s description very well. It is now located in the IRSNB collections. There is a ♂ under this name in the Macquart collection in MNHN, under no. 695. It is labelled by Macquart “ Lucilia / flavicalyptrata / ♂. Macq. 3 m. supp. ”, and has the accession no. 2108.41, a collection made in Bombay by Rousseau. This is clearly a later specimen identified by Macquart and not a syntype. It is apparently the specimen studied by Aubertin (1932: 144; 1933: 428), who mistakenly considered it to be the type. There are also 4 specimens in that part of the Bigot collection now in the BMNH, labelled by Macquart “ Lucilia / flavicalyptrata / ♂. Macq. 3 e. Supp. ”, and these too are later specimens and not syntypes. They were studied by Brauer (1899: 525). CURRENT IDENTITY. — The lectotype is a specimen of the common Oriental Neomyia lauta (Wiedemann, 1830) (Emden 1965: 129, as Orthellia) and this synonymy was established by Pont (1977 b: 465). The MNHN ♂ is Neomyia coeruleifrons (Macquart, 1851). The 3 ♂♂ in BMNH are Neomyia lauta whilst the ♀ is probably Neomyia timorensis (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFBBFFC6D1E2FA74FDF897C3.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from Bigot’s collection, where there is now 1 ♀ syntype in that part of the Bigot collection in OUMNH. Right mid leg missing, but otherwise in good condition. It is labelled by Macquart “ Aricia / flavicornis / ♀. Macq. ” and stands over a Bigot drawer label “ Sp. [Spilogaster] flavicornis. ♀. / Aricia. id. Macq. / Fernandopo. J. Bigot. ”. Macquart was mistaken in quoting the locality as in South America, and in any case this is quite clearly an African species. I have labelled and designate herewith this ♀ as lectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — This is a good species of Alluaudinella Giglio-Tos, 1895, and an older name for the species previously known as Alluaudinella fulvovittata Malloch, 1921, as currently understood (Paterson 1960: 359, 361; Pont 1980: 738). The type was also studied by Stein (1907 b: 275) who recognized it as a species close to Alluaudinella bivittata (Macquart, 1843).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFBAFFC6D3B2FD77FCAA946B.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from ♂♂ in Guérin-Méneville’s collection and Macquart’s collection. There are 4 ♂♂ syntypes under no. 985 of the Macquart collection in MNHN. They are each labelled “ Coll. Guévin- [sic] Méneville 1871 ”, “ Île Maurice ”, and an old hand-written tag “ 8 ”. The 1 st ♂ is labelled by Macquart “ Curtonevra / flavicornis ”. It should be noted that the spelling of “ Curtonevra ” matches that in the published description exactly, whilst Macquart also omitted “ n. sp. ” on the label as was his habit until after the early supplements to the Diptères Exotiques (see also the next species). This ♂ is in excellent condition, with only the left antenna missing. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. The remaining 3 ♂♂ have been labelled as paralectotypes. There is also a ♂ syntype in the BMNH, exchanged with MNHN in 1924. This has the same three labels mentioned above. I have labelled it as paralectotype. There is a further ♂ syntype in box G. 22 of the Macquart collection in MHNL, over the label “ C. flavicornis / Isle de France ”. This does not have the two printed MNHN labels, but it does have the old hand-written number “ 8 ”. I have labelled it as paralectotype. In the same series in MNHN, there is a ♀ labelled in the same way as the 4 ♂♂, but as Macquart only mentioned ♂♂ in his description, this cannot be a syntype. There is also a ♂ labelled “ Desjardins / Madagascar (?) ”, which is not a syntype as Desjardins is not mentioned as a collector of the original material. CURRENT IDENTITY. — All 6 syntypes are conspecific, and the name Curtonevra flavicornis is a junior synonym	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFBAFFC6D1C9FE9FFC7F91EE.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from the ♀ sex, without any information as to locality or depository. Amongst the series of Curtonevra flavicornis Macquart, 1843 (see preceding species) in the Macquart collection in MNHN, I found a ♀ that is undoubtedly a syntype of Cyrtonevra flavicornis Macquart, 1851, and I have arranged this under no. 985 bis. It is labelled by Macquart “ Cyrtonevra / flavicornis / ♀. Macq. n. sp. ”. It should be noted that the spelling of “ Cyrtonevra ” matches exactly that of the original publication and differs from the spelling “ Curtonevra ” used consistently by Macquart in his earlier papers; and the addition of “ n. sp. ” to the label is a feature of his later work and was not used as early as 1843. The accession number of this specimen is 2901.40, which refers to a collection made on the île de France (Mauritius) by Desjardins. This syntype is quite rubbed and damaged; right antenna, left foreleg, left mid tibia + tarsus, left hind tarsomeres 2 - 5, and all the right legs missing. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Cyrtonevra flavicornis is in fact conspecific with the preceding species and is a junior synonym of Dimorphia cognata (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830) (Pont 1980: 745).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFBAFFC9D1FAFB20FE5F9755.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — The syntype is in that part of the Bigot collection now in the BMNH. It is dirty and rather mouldy; posterior part of pleura on the right side eaten away; left wing and right mid leg missing. It is labelled by Macquart “ Pyrellia / flavicornis / ♀. nov. sp. ”, and stands over Bigot’s drawer label “ P. flavicornis. ♀. / Brazil. Macq. ”. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Pyrellia flavicornis has been used as the valid name for the species of Morellia Robineau- Desvoidy, 1830, previously known as Morellia ochrifacies (Rondani, 1850) (see Pont 1972: 8; Pamplona 1986: 648). However, the valid name for this species is now Morellia violacea (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830) (Carvalho et al. 1993: 13; 2005: 20). Morellia violacea was formerly treated as a junior secondary homonym of Musca violacea Fabricius, 1805 (references in Pont 1972: 8, 9), but the type of M. violacea Fabricius, 1805 has subsequently been examined and the name transferred to the family Calliphoridae (Michelsen 1979: 191) so that this homonymy no longer exists and the name Morellia violacea (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830) can be used for this species.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFB5FFC9D1F5FDD6FC7F9100.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♀♀. Macquart (1850 c: 535) recorded this species as present in the MHNL collection, but no syntypes have been located. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Macquart himself suggested that this might be the ♀ of his Anthomyia nitida, described from the ♂ sex on the previous page (338). Bezzi & Stein (1907: 721) followed this although they were still unable to interpret A. nitida. Hennig (1976: 924) located some specimens of A. nitida in MNHN (see below, under Anthomyia nitida Macquart, 1835), and on the basis of these I have synonymized Macquart’s name Anthomyia frontalis with Fannia serena (Fallén, 1825) (Pont 1986 b: 55).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFB5FFC9D3A9FAF0FC9094A0.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — No syntypes were found in the Macquart collection in MHNL, but a ♂ was found amongst the miscellaneous Macquart material in MNHN. It is labelled “ 300 bis ” and “ Hydrotaea / floccosa ” by Macquart, and it is evidently a syntype. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. It is very damp and covered with dirt and mould, but it is quite recognizable specifically. CURRENT IDENTITY. — The name floccosa has always been treated as a junior synonym of Hydrotaea armipes (Fallén, 1825) (Bezzi & Stein 1907: 650; Hennig 1962 c: 710), and the lectotype does indeed belong to the species to which the name H. armipes was formerly applied. However, the lectotype of H. armipes was found to belong to the species previously known as H. occulta (Meigen, 1826) (Pont 1984: 281), and so the name Hydrotaea floccosa must be used for H. armipes of authors (see Pont 1986 b: 78).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFB5FFC9D3BEFD8DFEE591B9.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described without statement of sex or number of specimens. No material was found in the Macquart collection in MHNL, but 1 ♂ was found in the miscellaneous Macquart material of MNHN. It is labelled by Macquart “ 320 ” and “ Chortophila / floccosa ” and is evidently a syntype. I labelled it as lectotype, and the lectotype designation has been effectuated by Griffiths (1991: 970). Apart from a little dust and mould, it is in excellent condition. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Bezzi & Stein (1907: 712), Hennig (1974 a: 752) and Dely-Draskovits (1993: 49) have treated this name as a junior synonym of the cabbage root fly Delia brassicae (Wiedemann, 1817) (now correctly called Delia radicum (Linnaeus, 1758 )), and this synonymy is correct. The lectotype shows well the “ cuisses postérieures à poils assez courts, touffus près de la base ” which Macquart mentioned in his description and which is a diagnostic character for ♂♂ of D. radicum.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFB5FFC8D1CFFBB9FE1594BE.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♀♀. Macquart (1850 c: 535) recorded this species as present in the MHNL collection. There are now no syntypes in the Macquart collection in MHNL, but Hennig (1974 a: 753) found 1 ♀, evidently a syntype, in the miscellaneous Macquart material in MNHN. There are two labels in Macquart’s hand, “ 324 ” and his determination “ Chortophila / frontalis ”. This ♀ is slightly dirty and has all left foretarsomeres, right foretarsomeres 3 - 5, and right mid tarsomeres 4 - 5 missing; otherwise it is well preserved. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — The name frontalis was synonymized with Delia radicum (Linnaeus, 1758) by Hennig (1974 a: 752, as brassicae (Wiedemann, 1817 )) and Dely-Draskovits (1993: 49). Hennig (op. cit.: 753) also pointed out that Macquart’s ♀ of frontalis could be either Delia radicum or Delia floralis (Fallén, 1824), which are hardly distinguishable in the ♀ sex. If the differences given by Ringdahl (1959: 298) hold good, then this ♀ is indeed D. radicum. From the point of view of formal nomenclature, however, the actual identity makes no difference as C. frontalis is junior to the other two names, and Hennig’s decision to synonymize Chortophila frontalis with Delia radicum should be followed.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFB4FFC8D3A1FB06FE8E93E1.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of both sexes. No syntypes have been located. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Interpretation of this name is difficult. Bezzi & Stein (1907: 717), Hennig (1976: 922) and Dely-Draskovits (1993: 100) have left it as an unrecognized species of Anthomyiidae. I believe that the reddish ground-colour of the head, to which the name fulviceps makes allusion, is in fact an artefact and the result of insufficient hardening, and that the name Anthomyia fulviceps is a junior synonym of Delia platura (Meigen, 1826) (n. syn.).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFB4FFC8D1C7FB53FCD893E1.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♂♂. No syntypes have been located. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Bezzi & Stein (1907: 717, Chortophila) and Séguy (1937: 94, Hylemyia) have listed fuscipennis as an unrecognized species of Anthomyiidae, but it was not mentioned by Hennig (1955 - 1964, 1966 - 1976), in his revisions of the Palaearctic Muscidae and Anthomyiidae, or by Dely-Draskovits (1993). Like Anthomyia brunnipennis Macquart, 1835 (see above), this is probably identical with Pegoplata aestiva (Meigen, 1826), and Macquart’s name is herewith formally synonymized with Pegoplata aestiva (Meigen, 1826) (n. syn.).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFB4FFC8D3DBFDF3FF0891D0.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Macquart described this species from material in his own collection, and there is 1 ♂ syntype in MHNL, in box G. 21 of the Macquart collection. It stands over the label “ M. frontalis. / Guyon. Alger. ”. It is rather mouldy, but is otherwise remarkably well preserved. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — This is a species of Musca Linnaeus, 1758, but the proepisternal depression cannot be seen. However, the comparatively broad frons and the 4 - vittate scutum indicate that this can only be Musca domestica Linnaeus, 1758, as was first suggested by Patton (1922: 417) and more recently stated by Pont (1986 b: 91).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFB4FFC8D1C0FF1BFBD0911F.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There is 1 ♂ in MNHN, under no. 1876 of the Macquart collection. It has the accession no. 9538.34, and this refers to material collected by d’Orbigny with the following notes in the d’Orbigny catalogue: “ no. 42. semblable en tout à notre mouche commune de France. ” It was collected on a “ voyage de Buenos-Ayres à Corrientes, en remontant le Parana sur 300 lieues de longeur ”, 15 February to 15 March 1827. It is dusty, with right hind leg missing; otherwise well preserved. Albuquerque (1950 a: 241, 242, figs 1 - 4) studied this species and referred to the “ lectótipo ♂ e 1 paralectótipo ♂ ”, but there is in fact only 1 ♂ under this name in MNHN. However, under the species Spilogaster limbatinevris Macquart, 1851 (see below, under limbatinevris), which Albuquerque synonymized with fuscinevris, there is also a single ♂ syntype and I believe that Albuquerque, in synonymizing these names, has treated the two type-series as a single type-series for fuscinevris. This appears to have been his practice in other cases too (e. g., Aricia coeruleigaster, see above). However, his designation of the ♂ standing under fuscinevris as the lectotype for this species can be accepted as valid. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Limnophora fuscinevris is a junior synonym of Neurotrixa felsina (Walker, 1849) (Pont 1972: 48; Lopes 1985: 68; Carvalho et al. 1993: 61, 62; 2005: 100; Costacurta & Carvalho 2005: 928).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFB7FFCBD386FF1BFED9913A.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There is 1 ♂ syntype in the Bigot collection in OUMNH. It was lent by Verrall to Stein in 1907, according to a note in Verrall’s MS list of the species in the Bigot collection. It is labelled by Macquart “ Hydrotea / fuscocalyptrata / ♂. Macq. ”, and stands over a Bigot drawer label “ O. [Onodontha] fuscocalyptrata. ♂. / Hydrotea. id. Macq. / Australie. J. Bigot. ”. It is in appalling condition, having been attacked by beetle pest and now being fragmentary: part of the thorax (hollowed out) and both wings are still on the pin; part of the abdomen and part of the head have been untidily gummed to the front part of the thorax; some legs and leg fragments are gummed on. There is much beetle-produced debris on these remains. No part of either foreleg is preserved. In 1973, I referred to this ♂ as the holotype, and this must now be interpreted as lectotype designation by inference. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Stein (1907 b: 275, 276) saw this specimen but because of its atrocious condition was unable to identify it. The venation, the course of the subcosta, and Macquart’s description of the ♂ foreleg all indicate a species of Hydrotaea Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830, as currently defined, but it is not an Australian species. In my opinion, it must be a South American species, and it is very similar to H. cyaneiventris Macquart, 1851 (see Pont 1972: 12; 1973 b: 285; Carvalho et al. 1993: 44; 2005: 43).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFB7FFCBD1E0FD11FB5D9346.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from Bigot’s collection. There is 1 ♂ syntype in that part of the Bigot collection now in BMNH. It was earlier redescribed by Bigot (1858: 371) and also seen by Brauer (1899: 527). It was listed by me as the holotype (Pont 1990: 165), and this statement must now be interpreted as lectotype designation by inference. The lectotype is not in good condition: rather mouldy, and left wing quite damaged. It has no data, but is labelled by Macquart “ Musca / gabonensis / ♂. Macq. ”, and stands over a Bigot drawer label “ M. Gabonensis. ♂. / Gabon. Macq. ”. CURRENT IDENTITY. — It is a species of Musca Linnaeus, 1858, and belongs to the group of species formerly placed in the subgenus Viviparomusca Townsend, 1915: the supra-squamal ridge is setulose along its entire length. The colour of the basicosta is not apparent, but the yellow syntergite 1 + 2 and other characters identify M. gabonensis as the species previously known as Musca natalensis Villeneuve, 1916, and this synonymy was published by Pont (1980: 727). Musca gabonensis as interpreted by previous authors (Patton 1936: 482; Emden 1939: 81; Peris 1967: 34; Zielke 1971: 137) belongs to the subgenus Eumusca Townsend, 1911, and the valid name for this species is now Musca aethiops Stein, 1913.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFB7FFCBD38EFB6CFBFD97D9.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♀♀ in the collection of Pastor Hoffmeister of Nordhausen in Germany. No material of this species has been seen since, nor have I been able to locate any syntypes. Nordhausen is near Kassel, where there is a natural history museum, but there is no record of a Hoffmeister collection in that museum (F. Malec, pers. comm.). Further searches for Hoffmeister’s collection have been without success (R. Bährmann, pers. comm.), and it is believed to have been destroyed. I have seen a small number of Hoffmeister specimens in the ZMHU that came with the H. Loew collection, but no specimen labelled as Coenosia fuscopunctata was found. CURRENT IDENTITY. — The name has been listed as an unrecognized species of Coenosia Meigen, 1826 (Huckett 1965 b: 877). The reasons for this treatment have been discussed by Huckett (1934). He pointed out that Coenosia fuscopunctata of North American authors was the same as Neodexiopsis ovata (Stein, 1898) (Huckett 1934: 71, 79), but he was unwilling to synonymize N. ovata formally with C. fuscopunctata, although there was nothing in the description of fuscopunctata to contradict such a course, because of the absence of the type (Huckett 1934: 113). The situation is best resolved, if so desired, by the designation of a neotype for Coenosia fuscopunctata, within the framework of a revision of North American species of Neodexiopsis Malloch, 1920.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFB7FFCAD1CBF9F8FEC79792.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of specimens of both sexes. No syntypes have been located. CURRENT IDENTITY. — The name was listed by Bezzi & Stein (1907: 717) and Hennig (1976: 922) as an unrecognized species of the Anthomyiidae. However, Macquart himself states that the species is “ semblable à la nitida ” (i. e. Anthomyia nitida Macquart, 1835), which is a junior synonym of Fannia serena (Fallén, 1825) (see below under Anthomyia nitida Macquart, 1835). Anthomyia geniculata differs from A. nitida by the slightly larger size, “ reflets blancs ” on the body, and yellow knees. In these respects, it agrees with Fannia sociella (Zetterstedt, 1845), and I have synonymized Macquart’s name with Fannia sociella (Pont 1986 a: 56).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFB6FFCAD3B1FCC4FD9A91EF.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♂♂. No syntypes have been located. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Bezzi & Stein (1907: 717), Hennig (1976: 922) and Dely-Draskovits (1993: 101) have listed this as an unrecognized species of Anthomyiidae. Following a suggestion from Dr V. Michelsen (pers. comm.), Chortophila geniculata is synonymized with Emmesomyia grisea (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830) (n. syn.), with which Macquart’s generalized description agrees.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFB6FFCAD3BAFB20FB959678.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There is 1 ♀ syntype in MNHN, under no. 1892 of the Macquart collection. It has the accession no. 12.47, which refers to a collection made by de Castelnau in Brazil, Rio Paraguay, Matto Grosso state. It is labelled by Macquart “ Cordylura / geniculata / ♂. Macq. n. sp. ”, and has been labelled as “ Phyllogaster ” by Séguy. It is not in good condition: there is some mould; most of left wing, abdomen after segment 1 + 2, right mid leg and right hind leg missing; left hind leg loose and gummed to the pin by me. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — The species was not recognized as a species of Muscidae either by Stein (1919) or by Séguy (1937), and was first assigned here as probably a species of Phyllogaster Stein, 1898, by Séguy (1952: 6). Following Séguy, I assigned it to Tetramerinx Berg, 1898 (syn.: Phyllogaster Stein, 1898, preocc.) (Pont 1972: 35). However, so far as can be seen, there is only one pair of presutural dorsocentral setae, which would exclude this species from the Tetramerinx group of genera. Further characters are one postsutural intra-alar seta; a pair of broad black paramedian vittae on the scutum; hind tibia with one very long anterodorsal seta and with the dorsal preapical placed high on the tibia (separated by its own length from tip of tibia). It therefore appears to belong to the genus Cordiluroides Albuquerque, 1954, and this information was communicated to Lopes & Couri (1989: 2; see also Carvalho et al. 1993: 118; 2005: 186, 187). Couri & Pamplona (1992: 257) included C. geniculata in a key to the species of Cordiluroides and gave some notes based on Macquart’s original description.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFB6FFCAD1F5FCAEFD3F9024.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There is 1 ♀ syntype in that part of the Bigot collection now in the BMNH. It was also studied by Brauer (1899: 517). It is very mouldy. It is labelled by Macquart “ Stomoxys / geniculata. ♀ / Macq. n. sp. ”, and stands over a Bigot drawer label reading “ S. geniculata. ♀ / Brazil. Macq. ”. It was listed as holotype by Pont (1990: 165), and this statement has to be interpreted as lectotype designation by inference. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Despite its poor condition, it can be recognized as a specimen of Stomoxys calcitrans (Linnaeus, 1758), a synonymy first given by Stein (1919: 102).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFB6FFCDD1F1FA5AFEF9941C.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of unsexed specimens, though the description indicates that only ♂♂ were available. No syntypes have been located. CURRENT IDENTITY. — The species can easily be recognized from the description as a large and characteristic species of Fannia Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 (e. g., Hennig 1955 a: 47), and is now known as Fannia lustrator (Harris, 1780) (Pont 1986 a: 50).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFB1FFCDD1D8FE85FBBE914C.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Macquart wrote that “ le nom de floricola donné à cette espèce par M. Robineau-Desvoidy a dû être changé, parce que Meigen l’a donné précédemment à une autre Anthomyie ”. In fact, Robineau-Desvoidy (1830: 572) described his floricola into Delia, and it is still in Delia Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830, whilst Meigen’s floricola was described into Anthomyia Meigen, 1803 (Meigen 1826: 145) and is now in Fannia Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830, so that no primary homonymy exists nor is there any longer any secondary homonymy. Hennig (1974 b: 820) found a ♂ labelled by Macquart as “ 342 ” and “ Anthomyia / impressitarsis ” in MNHN, which he recognized as a species of Fannia. I have identified it as Fannia canicularis (Linnaeus, 1761). CURRENT IDENTITY. — The name Anthomyia impressitarsis remains a junior objective synonym of Delia floricola Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830, and both floricola and impressitarsis are junior synonyms of Delia cardui (Meigen, 1826) (Dely-Draskovits 1993: 41).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFB1FFCDD3A6FAF0FB5B944C.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from material collected by Delegorgue. The syntypes are presumed to have been destroyed: under no. 992 of the Macquart collection in MNHN, there is a label for this species but no specimens. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Spilogaster hirtipes is regarded as a good species of the genus Helina Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 (Emden 1951: 610; Pont 1980: 735, where the page reference is erroneously given as 220 instead of 202).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFB1FFCDD1C3FB82FBD09346.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of both sexes. No syntypes have been located. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Bezzi & Stein (1907: 671) and Hennig (1960 a: 399) have both listed this as an unrecognized species of Limnophora Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830. However, Macquart’s description fits very well the common European species Limnophora maculosa (Meigen, 1826), which is not mentioned in Macquart’s work, and I have synonymized Macquart’s name with Limnophora maculosa (Pont 1986 b: 180).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFB1FFCDD3BDFE52FF1391BE.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described in Lucas’ (1849 a, b) reports on Algerian insects, from an unspecified number of ♂♂, and the collector Lucas appended the following note on distribution to Macquart’s description: “ C’est aux environs d’Alger, en mars, à Mustapha, que j’ai pris cette espèce, dont je n’ai rencontré que quelques individus ”. Under no. 219 of the Macquart collection in MNHN, there is a single ♂ of this species. This has not been labelled by Macquart, but has a printed label with the data “ Muséum Paris / Algérie / Coll. H. Lucas 78 - 49 ”. It also has an old green disc with “ 230 ” on the reverse. It has some mould, especially on head and legs, but is otherwise well preserved. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. In box G. 21 of the Macquart collection in MHNL, there is a label for Pyrellia hirsutoculata with the letter “ L ” (Lille), but there is no specimen. As the locality indicates, the specimen formerly here could hardly have been a syntype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — The name Lucilia hirsutoculata is a junior synonym of Dasyphora albofasciata (Macquart, 1839), as was formally established by Hennig (1963 d: 947, 948). Stein (1919: 108) treated it as a good species of Dasyphora Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830, and so did Séguy (1937: 388) although, curiously, he included D. albofasciata as a junior synonym of D. hirsutoculata which he erroneously called D. hirsutomaculata (Pont 1986 b: 105).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFB1FFCCD1FEF9FBFEB596FC.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There is 1 ♂ syntype in the part of the Bigot collection that is now in OUMNH. It is extremely damaged, but is in fact an immature ♂ (as pointed out by Emden 1965: 610), and not a ♀ as stated by Macquart (and also by Stein 1907 b: 277). The head is squashed almost flat, so that the occiput appears to be the “ frons ” and this must have misled Macquart and Stein into thinking that they were studying a typical broad-fronted ♀; the thorax is rather compressed and is covered with some kind of shining glue or grease, and the scutellum is also damaged; left wing loose; all legs present; the abdomen is present and confirms that this is in fact a ♂. It is labelled by Macquart “ Hydrotoea / javana. ♀ / Macq. n. sp. ”, and stands over a Bigot drawer label “ H. javana. ♀. / Java. Macq. ”. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — This is a species of the genus Heliographa Malloch, 1921, and an older name for the species previously known as Heliographa tonsa (Stein, 1909), as suggested by Emden (1965: 610) and Pont (1977 b: 503). This synonymy is supported by the very short-haired arista, the shape of wing-cell r 4 + 5, the presence of setulae on the sides of scutellum near base, and the bare sternite 1.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFB0FFCCD3B6FA41FC9694BE.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — No syntypes were found in the Macquart collection in MHNL, but I found 1 ♂ syntype in MNHN. This is labelled by Macquart “ 248 ” and “ lasiophthalma ”. It lacks left mid tarsomeres 4 - 5 and right hind leg; left wing is glued to the mount; otherwise condition excellent. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. It is probably the specimen seen by Séguy (1925: 94), and was also seen by Hennig (1963 d: 951). CURRENT IDENTITY. — Lucilia lasiophthalma was synonymized with L. eriophthalma Macquart, 1834, by Bezzi & Stein (1907: 607), and both names were placed as junior synonyms of Eudasyphora cyanella (Meigen, 1826) by Hennig (1963 d: 950, as Dasyphora). This synonymy is correct.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFB0FFCCD392FC35FE449009.taxon	discussion	REMARK. — Macquart’s description of this species, particularly of the yellow basal hind tarsomere, clearly indicates a species of Lonchaeidae. It was given the replacement name Lasiops aenescens by Meigen (1838: 324), and redescribed by Lioy (1864: 992) as Lasiophtalma (sic) nigrovirescens. The name Chortophila lasiophthalma is a junior synonym of Dasiops latifrons (Meigen, 1826) (Kovalev & Morge 1984: 249).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFB0FFCCD1D7FDF3FBAD969B.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from a series of ♂♂ from France, and from Italy where they were collected by Vanderlinden. No syntypes have been located. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Spilogaster lasiophthalma has always been recognized as a good species of Helina Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 (Bezzi & Stein 1907: 641; Hennig 1957: 190; d’Assis-Fonseca 1968: 48, 53; Pont 1986 b: 144; Gregor et al. 2002: 138, 139).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFB0FFCCD1EEFBCFFBFF93E1.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — In box G. 21 of the Macquart collection in MHNL, I found three specimens over the label “ M. lateralis / L. ” (Lille). One of these is a headless calliphorid and is not a syntype. The other two are ♀♀, and are extremely mouldy. One has the right hind leg missing and has obvious yellow patches on the sides of the abdomen: I have labelled this ♀ and designate it herewith as lectotype. The other ♀ has been labelled as paralectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Musca lateralis has always been treated as a junior synonym of Musca domestica Linnaeus, 1758 (Bezzi & Stein 1907: 603; Hennig 1964 a: 999; Pont 1986 b: 90). Although the proepisternal depression is not visible in either lectotype or paralectotype, other characters, such as the buff sides to the abdominal tergites, indicate that this synonymy is correct.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFB3FFCFD1DFFDD6FBDD9185.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from both sexes, but the only surviving syntype is a ♀, under no. 1880 of the Macquart collection in MNHN. It has the accession no. 670.37 (Chile, collector Gay), and it is labelled by Macquart “ N °. 88. / Chortophila / limbinervis ”. It is dirty, but otherwise well preserved. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. Stein (1907 b: 278) redescribed some specimens (5 ♂♂ and 1 ♀) standing over the name limbinervis in Bigot’s collection in OUMNH, but these are not syntypes. CURRENT IDENTITY. — This species belongs to the genus Anthomyia Meigen, 1803, and to the group formerly segregated as the genus Craspedochoeta Macquart, 1851, in which it was listed by Pont (1974 a: 3). It is a valid species with just the cross-veins r-m and dm-cu clouded, and was correctly interpreted by Malloch (1934: 183). The OUMNH specimens are correctly identified as Anthomyia limbinervis (Macquart, 1843).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFB3FFCFD3D2FF1BFD9796E6.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from material collected at the Cape by Guérin-Méneville. In the Macquart collection in MNHN, under no. 986, there is a label for this species but no specimens, and the syntypes are presumed destroyed. CURRENT IDENTITY. — The species has not been recognized since it was described. Bezzi (1908: 92) placed it in Phaonia Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 (as Aricia Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830), whilst Stein transferred it first to Spilogaster Macquart, 1835 (Stein 1908: 173) and then to Mydaea Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 (Stein 1919: 120); I retained it provisionally in Phaonia (Pont 1980: 737). It is difficult to match Macquart’s description with any of the described South African Phaoniinae or Mydaeinae, and Macquart’s choice of the name “ latipennis ” is not particularly specific. The described characters do actually fall within the many colour forms of the widespread Dimorphia tristis (Wiedemann, 1819), and the name Aricia latipennis Macquart, 1843, is herewith synonymized with Dimorphia tristis (Wiedemann, 1819) (n. syn.).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFB3FFCFD386FC18FC9E94A0.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There is 1 ♂ syntype under no. 1871 of the Macquart collection in MNHN. It has an old hand-written tag “ 42 ” and the accession no. 9538.34. This refers to material collected by d’Orbigny on a journey in South America, and no. 9538 in the d’Orbigny catalogue states: “ no. 42. Semblable en tout à notre mouche commune de France ”. The specimen was collected on a journey “ de Buenos-Ayres à Corrientes, en remontant le Parana sur 300 lieues de longueur ”, from 15 February to 15 March 1827. This is exactly the same data as for Limnophora fuscinevris Macquart, 1851 (see above). The syntype is clearly from Argentina, and not from Tasmania as stated by Macquart. It is labelled by Macquart “ Spilogaster / limbatinevris / ♂. Macq. n. sp. ”. It is in poor condition: abdomen, antennae, left wing, and all legs except left hind femur missing. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. This syntype was studied by Albuquerque (1950 a: 241, 242), who included it in the type-series of Spilogaster fuscinevris Macquart, 1851 and designated it as paralecto- type of S. fuscinevris (see above under S. fuscinevris). This action is, of course, quite unacceptable. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Albuquerque (loc. cit.) established from the MNHN accessions register that this is a South American species. He synonymized it with Spilogaster fuscinevris Macquart, 1851, and I have synonymized both names with Neurotrixa felsina (Walker, 1849) (Pont 1972: 48; Carvalho et al. 1993: 61; 2005: 100; Costacurta & Carvalho 2005: 928).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFB3FFCED1DBFB3DFEDC97D9.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Macquart described this species from the ♂ sex only, and the collector Lucas added the following information on distribution: “ Cette espèce habite les environs d’Alger; je l’ai prise en mars, à Kouba, dans les lieux humides; je l’ai rencontrée aussi aux environs du cercle de Lacalle. ” In fact, Macquart’s fig. 7 shows a ♀, not a ♂, and the only surviving syntype is also a ♀, under no. 233 of the Macquart collection in MNHN. The labels include a green disc with “ 220 bis ” on the reverse, and a printed label “ Muséum Paris / Algérie / Coll. H. Lucas 78 - 49 ”. There is no Macquart label. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. It is in rather poor condition: it is quite mouldy, with both forelegs and tarsomeres 2 - 5 of right hind leg missing. There is an Algerian ♂ in the Bigot collection in OUMNH, but it is labelled “ Constantine ” by Bigot and it is not a syntype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Bezzi & Stein (1907: 641) included this as an unrecognized species of Mydaea Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830, but it has been synonymized with Phaonia trimaculata (Bouché, 1834) by Séguy (1937: 338), Hennig (1963 c: 885) and Pont (1986 b: 132). Pending further work on the various Mediterranean forms currently named as “ Phaonia trimaculata ”, this identification is correct. The OUMNH ♂ is also Phaonia trimaculata.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFB2FFCED3BBFAF0FC6A946B.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♀♀. No syntypes have been located. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Bezzi & Stein (1907: 686), Hennig (1969 b: 295) and Dely-Draskovits (1993: 63) included this as an unrecognized species of Hydrophoria Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830. The description agrees perfectly with Zaphne (formerly Hydrophoria) ambigua (Fallén, 1823), and I have no hesitation in synonymizing Hydrophoria liturata Macquart, 1835 with Zaphne ambigua (Fallén, 1823) (n. syn.).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFB2FFCED3C9FD11FD9991B9.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There is 1 ♂ syntype under no. 370 of the Macquart collection in MNHN. Species of Lispe Latreille, 1797, were commonly mis-sexed in the 19 th century, as the ♂♂ are dichoptic like the ♀♀, and so it is not surprising that Macquart identified this ♂ as a ♀. It has been labelled by Macquart “ N °. 90. / Lispa / lineata ”. No. 90 is the sequence-number of lineata in Macquart’s paper. I have labelled this ♂ and designate it herewith as lectotype. The right mid leg is missing, otherwise it is in excellent condition. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Lispe lineata has been treated as a junior synonym of Lispe nivalis Wiedemann, 1830, as currently understood (Stein 1919: 143; Hennig 1960 b: 447; Pont 1986 b: 189), and this synonymy is correct.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFB2FFF1D1F1FE9FFDD794EF.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Macquart (1850 c: 534) recorded this species as present in the MHNL collection. 1 ♀ syntype has been found in MNHN, which agrees with Macquart’s description of “ d’un noir cendré, un peu métallique ”. It is labelled by Macquart “ N °. 83. / Limnophora / liturata. ”. It lacks the left mid leg and left hind leg, but it is otherwise in good condition. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. In box F of the Macquart collection in MHNL, there is a ♀ over the label “ L. / liturata / Meig. [sic] Lille. ”. Despite certain discrepancies with the original description, I think that this too must have been a syntype and I have accordingly labelled it as paralectotype. It is not in good condition; head, left foreleg and several tarsomeres missing, and right wing broken. A further ♀ syntype is in OUMNH, labelled by Macquart “ Limnophora / liturata. / Macq. ”. I have labelled it as paralectotype. It is in poor condition, being mouldy and with all four mid and hind legs missing. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Bezzi & Stein (1907: 672) and Hennig (1960 a: 399) listed L. liturata as an unrecognized species of Limnophora Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830. However, the lectotype belongs to the genus Phaonia Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830, and appears to be identical with Phaonia aeneiventris (Zetterstedt, 1845), as established by Pont (1986 b: 116). It is, however, a junior secondary homonym and cannot therefore be used as the valid name for this species. It has three postsutural dorsocentral setae, prealar subequal to second notopleural, halteres yellow, foretibia with a submedian posterior seta, hind tibia with a supplementary posterodorsal seta near base, costal spine strong, and arista very short-haired. This species is mainly Fenno-Scandian in distribution, but it has been recorded by Hennig (1963 a: 797) and Gregor et al. (2002: 113) from France, Germany, Poland, Czech Republic, Austria and Switzerland, and the area of Lille in northern France is therefore reasonable. The MHNL paralectotype appears virtually identical with the lectotype in structural characters and also has yellow halteres; but the thorax and abdomen are subshining black, nowhere “ cendré ”, and the specimen looks superficially more like Phaonia nymphaearum (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830). I have been unable to make a positive identification of this specimen. The OUMNH paralectotype is Phaonia serva (Meigen, 1826): arista plumose, facial edge in lateral view slightly projecting beyond profrons, three postsutural dorsocentrals, prealar long and strong, notopleuron with setulae, katepimeron with some short setulae, foretibia with a posterior seta, wing veins bare, haltere yellow.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF8DFFF1D3BBFE23FE2E90C2.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Macquart described this from ♀♀ from Senegal and île Bourbon (La Réunion), in MNHN and his own collection. Only 1 ♀ syntype has been located, under no. 999 of the Macquart collection in MNHN. No syntypes were found in the Macquart collection in MHNL or the Bigot collection in OUMNH. The MNHN syntype has an old white disc with “ Senegal / Guerin ”, and Macquart’s label “ Cleigastra [sic] / longicornis ”. It is not in good condition, and in fact Séguy (1952: 6) described it as “ un débris innommable ” (“ unidentifiable debris ”). It is rather mouldy; right antenna, left hind tarsomeres 4 - 5, right hind leg and abdomen missing; left eye eaten away. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Emden (1941: 254) did not see Macquart’s type but thought that the name might be referable to the muscid genus Anaphalantus Loew, 1857. As he pointed out, Macquart’s description agrees with the single species of this genus but his figure does not. However, discrepancies between Macquart’s text and illustrations are easy to find: for example, he frequently described a ♀ in his text but showed a ♂ head in his figure. The figures were intended only to give a generalized representation of the appearance of a species rather than a precise delineation of its characters. Cleigaster longicornis does indeed belong to the genus Anaphalantus, and is an older name for Anaphalantus pennatus Loew, 1857, as established by Pont (1980: 753).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF8DFFF1D3B2FA74FCE997D9.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There is one syntype in the Macquart collection in MNHN, under no. 2395. It is a ♂, and not a ♀ as stated by Macquart. ♂♂ of the genus Passeromyia Rodhain & Villeneuve, 1915, to which this species belongs, have a broad frons and there is little sexual dimorphism (see Pont 1974 b: fig. 1), so that Macquart’s error in sexing his specimen is an understandable one. Right antenna and right mid leg missing, and left wing broken across costa near base, otherwise well preserved. It has a pink label with the accession no. 4.46 (Tasmania, collector Verreaux), and is labelled by Macquart “ Cyrtonevra / longicornis / ♀. Macq. n. sp. ”. I have previously referred to it as the holotype (Pont 1974 b: 363), and this statement must be interpreted as lectotype designation by inference. CURRENT IDENTITY. — As noted above, this is a valid species of the genus Passeromyia, known only from Tasmania. It has been redescribed by Pont (1974 b: 363, 364).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF8DFFF1D1C4FD11FC2190D8.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Macquart (1850 c: 533) recorded this species as present in the MHNL collection. There is one syntype in box F of the Macquart collection in MHNL. It is extremely damaged: abdomen, right antenna, left foretarsomeres, tarsomeres 2 - 5 on left mid and hind leg, and all three right legs missing. What remains is very damp. The drawer label reads “ H. / maculata / Meig. [sic] Lille ”. There is no species described by Meigen as maculata in the Muscoidea, and so the “ Meig. ” on this label must be a lapsus for Macquart. I have labelled this ♂ and designate it herewith as lectotype. There is 1 ♂ in MNHN, labelled by Macquart “ 283 ” and “ maculata ”, but this is not a syntype as it does not agree with the description. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Bezzi & Stein (1907: 687), Hennig (1969 a: 287) and Dely-Draskovits (1993: 62) have treated H. maculata as a junior synonym of Hydrophoria ruralis (Meigen, 1826), and this synonymy is correct according to the lectotype. The ♂ in MNHN is Helina quadrinotata (Meigen, 1826).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF8DFFF0D1C8FA0EFEBE94BF.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from material in Bigot’s collection, and there is 1 ♀ syntype in that collection in OUMNH. Tarsomeres 4 - 5 of left mid and hind leg, and tarsomeres 3 - 5 of right foreleg missing, otherwise it is in good condition. It is labelled by Macquart “ Hylemyia / maculifrons / ♀. Macq. n. sp. ”, and stands over a Bigot drawer label “ H. maculifrons. ♀. / Egyptus. Macq. ”. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Stein (1907 b: 279) studied this specimen and stated that it was probably Lispe pygmaea Fallén, 1825. This synonymy is correct (Hennig 1960 b: 451; Pont 1986 b: 190).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF8CFFF0D1DAFD77FC519024.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There is 1 ♀ syntype under no. 1872 of the Macquart collection in MNHN. It has the accession no. 2896.34 (America, collector Leprieur), and an additional old label with the figure “ 294 ”. It is labelled by Macquart simply as “ maculipennis ”. It is in very poor condition: it is mouldy; left wing, posterior part of thorax and abdomen, left foretarsomeres (tarsomeres 2 - 5 gummed to pin), left mid leg, right foreleg, and both hind legs missing. Séguy (1937: 461; 1938: 114) wrote that the type was lost, but I see no grounds for not considering this specimen to be a syntype. I have accordingly labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Spilogaster maculipennis belongs to the genus Cyrtoneuropsis Malloch, 1925, and is an older name for the species known until recently as Cyrtoneuropsis trita (Stein, 1911), as interpreted by Snyder (1954: 452) (see Carvalho et al. 1993: 52; 2005: 85; Pamplona 1999: 10, 23, as Paracyrtoneurina).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF8CFFF0D3B9FB20FC1197C3.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described “ de la Colombie, collection de M. Fairmaire, et du Brésil, collection de M. Bigot ”. The only syntype located is in that part of the Bigot collection now in the BMNH. It is labelled by Macquart “ Pyrellia / maculipennis / ♀. Macq. n. sp. ”, and stands over a Bigot drawer label “ P. maculipennis. ♀. / Am. Merid. Macq. ”. It is in poor condition: it is mouldy, and lacks left mid leg and left hind leg. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. In MNHN, under no. 1858 of the Macquart collection, there are 2 ♂♂ under this name but they are not syntypes. One has the accession no. 16.47, which refers to a collection made by Castelnau in the Minas Gerais state of Brazil, and it is labelled by Macquart “ Pyrellia / maculipennis / ♂. Macq: 1. e Supp. ”. The other has the accession no. 9.43, which refers to a collection made by Claussen in the same state of Brazil. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Morellia maculipennis is the valid name for the species of Morellia Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830, previously known as M. violacea (Fabricius, 1805), as the Fabricius name is a junior primary homonym (see Pont 1972: 9; Pamplona 1986: 650; Carvalho et al. 1993: 18; 2005: 28). Of the 2 ♂♂ in MNHN, the Castelnau ♂ is correctly identified as Morellia maculipennis, and the Claussen ♂ is probably too although in atrocious condition and lacking both wings.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF8CFFF0D38EFDF3FE0B91EE.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There is 1 ♀ syntype, under no. 1857 of the Macquart collection in MNHN. It is in good condition. It has a green disc with the accession no. 9.43 (Brazil, Minas Gerais, collector Claussen), and is labelled by Macquart “ Pyrellia / maculipennata / ♀. Macq. n. sp. ”. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — The name P. maculipennata was synonymized with Morellia violacea (Fabricius, 1805) by Hough (1899: 3), but the name violacea is a junior primary homonym and in any case belongs to the family Calliphoridae (Michelsen 1979: 191). The oldest name for this species is Morellia maculipennis (Macquart, 1846) (Pont 1972: 9; Carvalho et al. 1993: 18; 2005: 29). The lectotype does indeed belong to this species as currently defined (Pamplona 1986: 650), and the synonymy first proposed by Hough can be confirmed.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF8CFFF3D1F6FA5AFD6F96E6.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Macquart described this species from ♂♂, which he collected himself in large numbers on Fucus at Dunkerque beach, “ le 20 juillet 1838, parcourant la plage de Dunkerque vers sept heures du matin […] ”. No type material survives (see also Hennig 1966: 15). CURRENT IDENTITY. — Scatophaga marina is listed with some doubt as a junior synonym of Fucellia maritima (Haliday, 1838) by Hennig (loc. cit.), a synonymy accepted without reservation by Dely-Draskovits (1993: 59). There is no reason to dispute this synonymy as F. maritima is known to occur along the French Channel coast although it is nothing like as abundant as Fucellia tergina (Zetterstedt, 1845). Both Macquart and Haliday published these names in 1838, and both papers appeared in November 1838: Macquart’s marina in the 3 rd fascicle of volume 7 of the Annales de la Société entomologique de France, and maritima in the 9 th fascicle of volume 2 of the Annals of Natural History. Haliday’s paper (Haliday 1838) was published on 1 November 1838 (Evenhuis 2003: 12), whereas no date beyond “ November ” is possible for Macquart’s paper (Evenhuis et al. in prep.), and so the publication date for Macquart’s paper must be 30 November 1838 by default. It should also be noted however that Haliday’s name was pre-published (as a nomen nudum) by Curtis (1837: 279) and so in justice to Haliday, it is right to continue to use his name which was clearly in use (though not formally made available) before Macquart’s, especially as Macquart did not collect his material until July 1838.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF8FFFF3D3AAFAF0FC0397A9.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from material collected by Pilate. No syntypes have been located. Brauer (1899: 522) studied some specimens of L. meridensis from North America in the Bigot collection and placed them in the genus Pyrellia Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830. Aubertin (1933: 429) stated that she had not found the type but was following Brauer in assigning the name to the Muscidae. This statement was the basis for James’ (1970) exclusion of the name from the Calliphoridae and for my own inclusion of it as a species of Morellia Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 (Pont 1972: 9). However, the specimens studied by Brauer, now in the BMNH, are labelled by Macquart “ Lucilia meridensis ♂ ♀. Macq. var. ” and are from North America. There are 1 ♂ and 3 ♀♀, and they belong to Neomyia cornicina (Fabricius, 1781). They are certainly not types and should not be used in assessing the identity of the name meridensis. CURRENT IDENTITY. — The description of Lucilia meridensis indicates that the name should in fact be referred to the Calliphoridae, either to the Chrysomyini or to Lucilia Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830. The angular forward curvature of vein M excludes all the muscid greenbottles except for species of Neomyia Walker, 1859, and this genus is excluded by Macquart’s description of yellow palpi and yellowish-white fronto-orbital plates (“ cotés [du front] d’un blanc jaunâtre ”).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF8FFFF3D1CAFCE1FB529346.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described by Macquart from both sexes in his own collection. There is no material in MNHN, but 1 ♀ is in Box G. 22 of the Macquart collection in MHNL. It is labelled “ 162. ” and stands over the label “ C. mexicana / Mexique ”. It is very mouldy, but no parts appear to be missing. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Snyder (1954: 425) thought that C. mexicana might be identical with Neomuscina tripunctata (Wulp, 1896), and I have also listed it as a species of Neomuscina Townsend, 1919 (Pont 1972: 50). The lectotype does indeed belong to Neomuscina and, despite its appalling condition, I have tentatively identified it as an older name for Neomuscina praetaseta Snyder, 1949 (Carvalho et al. 1993: 58; 2005: 94). It appears to have vein R 4 + 5 bare at base, one presutural acrostichal and four postsutural dorsocentral setae, hind tibia with one anterodorsal, hind femur with three dorsal to posterior preapical setae, femora and coxae yellow. Other characters, such as possible meral or proepimeral hairs or even wing-clouds, are obscured by the mould.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF8FFFF2D1FAF9FBFDE29647.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There is one syntype in that part of the Bigot collection now in the BMNH. Left hind leg, right mid tarsomeres 4 - 5, right hind tarsomeres 3 - 5, and right wing missing, otherwise it is in good condition. It is labelled by Macquart “ Cyrtonevra / micans / ♀. Macq. n. sp. ”, and stands over Bigot’s drawer label “ C. micans. ♀. / Baltimor. Macq. ”. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. Brauer (1899: 526) noted that the series of micans in the Bigot collection was mixed, that the ♂ was a species of Dasyphora Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830, and the ♀ a species of Cyrtoneura Macquart, 1834. The ♂ is from the Rocky Mountains and is clearly not a syntype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Cyrtonevra micans is a good species of Morellia Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 (Huckett 1965 a: 326; 1965 b: 912). The Rocky Mountains ♂ is a species of Graphomya Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF8EFFF2D004FE22FC8591A3.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Macquart described this species from the ♀ sex, but no material survives in MNHN or MHNL. However, Rondani (1866: 211) reported that he had received a French specimen as a gift from Macquart, and it seems likely that this was in fact a syntype since it came from Macquart’s personal collection. This specimen still exists in Rondani’s personal collection in MZLS. It is a ♂, but it has already been noted that Lispe species were frequently mis-sexed by 19 th century dipterists. It has a small oval label with the printed red figure “ 1401 ”. Alongside it is a label in Rondani’s hand reading “ nana / Macq. / Gallia ”, and it agrees perfectly with Macquart’s description. I can see no reason for not regarding this ♂ as a syntype, and I have accordingly labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. It is slightly dusty and faded with age, but otherwise in good condition. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Lispe nana has always been regarded as a good species of Lispe Latreille, 1796 (e. g., Becker 1904: 20; Hennig 1960 b: 446; Gregor et al. 2002: 174, 175), and the lectotype supports current usage of this name.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF8EFFF2D3A9FAA6FC8594EF.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♀♀. No syntypes have been located. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Bezzi & Stein (1907: 686), Hennig (1969 b: 296) and Dely-Draskovits (1993: 63) have listed this as an unrecognized species of Hydrophoria Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830. The species is described alongside others that are now placed amongst a number of dark sombre-coloured muscids, genera Phaonia Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830, Spilogona Schnabl, 1911, and Hebecnema Schnabl, 1889. Macquart’s brief description fits very well the common Hebecnema nigra (Robineau- Desvoidy, 1830), and this synonymy was established by Pont (1986 b: 160).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF8EFFF2D3C7FCFAFEC29073.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — The lectotype is under no. 2390 of the Macquart collection in MNHN. It is in excellent condition. The lectotype and the 6 ♂♂ and 9 ♀♀ paralectotypes (6 ♂♂ and 8 ♀♀ in MNHN, 1 ♀ in BMNH) all have the registration no. 13.44 (Tasmania, collector Verreaux). I excluded a further ♀ with the accession no. 3.47 (also Tasmania, collector Verreaux) from the type-series. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Musca minor is a junior synonym of Musca domestica Linnaeus, 1758, a synonymy first established by Patton (1923 a: 315; see also Pont 1967: 188; 1973 b: 169).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF8EFFF5D1EFFAD6FEAB9485.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from the ♀ sex, from Bigot’s collection. 2 ♀♀ syntypes were located in that part of this collection now in the BMNH; they were also seen by Brauer (1899: 516). They are without data, but one is labelled by Macquart “ Stomoxys / nigra / ♀. Macq. n. sp. ” and they stand over Bigot’s drawer label “ S. nigra. ♂. / Ins. Borbon. Macq. ”. Neither is in particularly good condition, but the one with Macquart’s determination label is slightly better and this was designated as lectotype (Pont 1990: 167). It is rather damp and dirty, with right foretarsomeres 2 - 5 missing. The 2 nd ♀ was labelled as paralectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Stomoxys nigra is a good species of the genus Stomoxys Geoffroy, 1762 (Zumpt 1973: 112). Stomoxys is actually masculine in gender (Steyskal 1975: 163) and so the correct combination is Stomoxys niger Macquart, 1851.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF89FFF5D1FCFE09FBD290F7.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There is 1 ♂ syntype in MNHN, under no. 2402 of the Macquart collection. The labels include a pink disc with the accession no. 1992.41, which refers to Durville’s Triton Bay material, and Macquart’s label “ Aricia / nigrimanus / ♂. Macq. n. sp. ”. It is in good condition: both mid legs are loose, but are still held in position amongst the general cluster of legs around the pin. I have previously referred to it as the holotype, and this must be interpreted as lectotype designation by inference. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Triton Bay is in West Papua province, Indonesian New Guinea, and this species is certainly not from New Guinea but from the southern part of South America. I identified it as a species of Helina Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830, and as an older name for the species Helina bifimbriata Malloch, 1934 (Pont 1967: 185; 1972: 22; Carvalho et al. 1993: 76; 2005: 117). The actual type-locality may well be the Strait of Magellan (see below under Brachypalpus pilosus Macquart, 1851: also described from Triton Bay, but actually labelled as Strait of Magellan). Albuquerque (1951: 4, fig. 8) studied the lectotype, which he referred to as “ holótipo ♂ ♀ ”, which is not a valid lectotype designation as it does not restrict the name to a single specimen (though his redescription is apparently only of the ♂), but he did not recognize it as a Neotropical species. Séguy (1937: 461; also 1938: 113) accepted it as a New Guinea species and made it the type-species of the new genus Tritonidis Séguy, 1937.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF89FFF5D3A0FA41FC6A94D1.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♀♀. No syntypes have been located. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Bezzi & Stein (1907: 705), Hennig (1974 a: 682) and Dely-Draskovits (1993: 89) have listed this as an unrecognized species of Pegomya Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830. However, as suggested to me by Dr V. Michelsen (pers. comm.), the meagre description and the small size fit Pegomya rufina (Fallén, 1825), a species not dealt with by Macquart, and Pegomyia nigrifrons is herewith formally synonymized with Pegomya rufina (Fallén, 1825) (n. syn.).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF89FFF5D3D0FE3CFDED9009.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♀♀, with no statement as to the depository. No syntypes have been located, nor were any found by Aubertin (1932: 142; 1933: 429). Under no. 1859 of the Macquart collection in MNHN, there is a ♀ from Brazil that has a Macquart label “ Pyrellia / nigriceps / ♀. Macq. n. sp. ”. This has an accession no. 9.43, which refers to a collection made in the Minas Gerais state of Brazil by Claussen. This ♀ cannot be a syntype because the locality is wrong and also because it disagrees fundamentally with Macquart’s description. Macquart writes: “ Palpes noirs […] cuillerons blancs […] ailes claires ”, whereas this ♀ has orange palpi, outer half of calypters infuscated, and wings with conspicuous dark spots. It has been correctly identified by Albuquerque as Morellia violacea (Fabricius, 1805) (for which the correct name is now Morellia maculipennis (Macquart, 1851 )). CURRENT IDENTITY. — I have previously discussed this name (Pont 1973 b: 202 - 204) and have synonymized it with the Australasian Neomyia australis (Macquart, 1848). This synonymy was first suggested by Aubertin (1933: 142, as Orthellia maronea (Walker, 1849 )). As I pointed out (loc. cit.), the actual specific identity of this name is unimportant as there are older available names for all the Australian muscid greenbottles.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF89FFF4D1C5FA2BFEB294A0.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of both sexes. No syntypes have been located. CURRENT IDENTITY. — This was included as an unrecognized species of Muscina Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 (or Curtonevra Macquart, 1834) by Bezzi & Stein (1907: 614) and Séguy (1937: 356), but was not mentioned by Hennig (1955 - 1964). It is clearly a junior synonym of Muscina levida (Harris, 1780), and has been listed as such (Pont 1986 b: 60).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF88FFF7D1E1FD40FD629406.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♂♂. Macquart (1850 c: 535) recorded this species as present in the MHNL collection. There is now no material in MHNL, but Hennig (1976: 924) found 1 ♂ and 1 ♀ in MNHN labelled as Anthomyia nitida by Macquart. He identified the ♂ as belonging to the genus Fannia Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830, and thought that the ♀ might be a syntype of Anthomyia frontalis Macquart, 1835 (see above). Only the ♂ can be a syntype of A. nitida. It is labelled by Macquart “ N °. 330. X / Anthomyia / nitida. ”. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. It is not in good condition: it has been largely eaten by beetle larvae, and only vestiges of the head and thorax remain on the pin; right wing missing; all legs missing except left mid leg and right hind leg. I have removed the abdomen, macerated it, and placed it in a vial of glycerine attached to the specimen. The ♀ is labelled by Macquart “ 330 ” and “ Anthomyia / nitida. ”. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Bezzi & Stein (1907: 721) listed A. nitida as an unrecognized species of Chortophila Macquart, 1835. Séguy (1937: 105) caused some confusion by listing Anthomyia nitida Macquart (1835: 338) and Hylemyia nitida Macquart (1835: 321) under one entry in the genus Hylemyia Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830. Hennig (1976: 924) referred to Anthomyia nitida but gave it the page reference (p. 321) of Hylemyia nitida. The lectotype is in fact a ♂ of Fannia serena (Fallén, 1825), and this synonymy was published by Pont (1986 b: 55). Enough remains of the lectotype to see the linear lower calypter, two prealar setulae, uniserial post-ocular setulae, and the identification is confirmed by the terminalia. The ♀ is also Fannia serena. Unfortunately, this synonymy creates a secondary homonymy in the genus Fannia Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830. Homalomyia (now Fannia) nitida Stein, 1895, now becomes a junior secondary homonym of A. nitida, and the replacement name Fannia pauli Pont, 1997, has been proposed for Fannia nitida (Rozkošný et al. 1997: 44).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF88FFF4D3D3FDD6FEA89073.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There is 1 ♀ syntype in the Bigot collection in OUMNH. It was lent by Verrall to Stein in 1907, according to a note in Verrall’s MS list of the contents of the Bigot collection. The labels include a purple label in G. Enderlein’s handwriting “ Australien / (Coll. Bigot) ”, and Macquart’s label “ Aricia / nigritarsis. ♀ / n. sp. Macq. ”. It stands over Bigot’s drawer label “ Y. [Yetodesia] nigritarsis. ♀. / Aricia. id. Macq. / Australie. J. Bigot. ”. It is in very poor condition: it is considerably mouldy; left mid leg and right hind tarsomeres 2 - 5 missing. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — This ♀ was studied by Stein (1907 b: 280) who gave a brief description and assigned it to the genus Spilogaster Macquart, 1835 (now = Helina Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830). Despite the appalling condition, it can be identified as a valid species of Helina, and as an older name for Helina piliventris Malloch, 1922. It has the body colour dark and non-metallic, halteres yellow, four postsutural dorsocentral setae, foretibia with a posterior seta, femora yellow, fore femoral extension moderate in size; and it agrees in all visible characters with H. piliventris. This synonymy has been recorded by Pont (1989 b: 686).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF88FFF4D3AEFAA7FC889709.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There is 1 ♂ syntype in the Bigot collection in OUMNH. It is labelled by Macquart “ Spilogaster / nitens. / ♂. Macq. n. sp. ”, and stands over a Bigot drawer label “ S. nitens. ♂. / Australia. / Macq. ”. It is in atrocious condition: it is covered in mould, the wings and all legs except left foreleg and left hind leg are missing. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Stein (1907 b) did not report on this specimen and presumably did not study it. It is apparently a species of Helina Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 (see Pont 1989 b: 686), and may possibly be an older name for the Australian H. caerulescens (Stein, 1910), but it is impossible to compare the external characters of H. nitens with those of H. caerulescens. To establish the identity of the species, it will be necessary to compare the terminalia of the lectotype of nitens with those of caerulescens, within the framework of a revision of Australian Helina.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF8BFFF7D1F9FAD7FB9A93E6.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♂♂. No syntypes have been located. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Bezzi & Stein (1907: 729), Hennig (1967 b: 167) and Dely-Draskovits (1993: 76) have synonymized this name with Paregle radicum (Linnaeus, 1758) (which, following study of the Linnaean types, is now correctly called Paregle audacula (Harris, 1780 )), and there is no reason to dispute this synonymy.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF8BFFF7D3A2FAD7FBDE9754.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Macquart did not give any locality for this species. Macquart (1850 c: 533) recorded this species as present in the MHNL collection. There is 1 ♂ in box F of the Macquart collection in MHNL, which I consider to be a syntype. It is in good condition, with right mid leg missing and right wing broken. The drawer label reads “ H. / nitida / Meig. [sic] Lille ”. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. In MNHN, there are 2 ♂♂ syntypes. One is labelled by Macquart “ N °. 299. X / Hydrophoria / nitida. ”; the other is labelled “ 299 ” and “ nitida ”. I have labelled them both as paralectotypes. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Hydrophoria nitida has consistently been treated as a good species of Phaonia Robineau- Desvoidy, 1830 (e. g., Hennig 1963 b: 848), and this is correct according to the lectotype. The species is now called by the older name of Phaonia nymphaearum (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830) (Pont 1986 b: 126). The two paralectotypes are conspecific with the ♂.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF8BFFF7D3C6FEB9FEB691A3.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from both sexes. The syntype series, consisting of 1 ♂ and 3 ♀♀, is under no. 2401 of the Macquart collection in MNHN. The ♂ and 2 ♀♀ have the accession no. 4.46, whilst the 3 rd ♀ has the number 3.47. Both refer to collections made in Tasmania by Verreaux. In addition, the ♂ has an old tag with the figure “ 46 ” and is labelled by Macquart “ Aricia / nitida / ♂. Macq. n. sp. ”. The ♂ lacks left foretarsomeres 2 - 5 and right mid tarsomeres 2 - 5, but is otherwise in excellent condition. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. The 3 ♀♀ have each been labelled as paralectotypes. Albuquerque (1950 b: 3) listed this material as “ lectótipos ♂ e ♀ e 2 ♀ paralectótipos ”. This is an invalid lectotype designation as it does not restrict the name to a single specimen. CURRENT IDENTITY. — The lectotype belongs to the genus Helina Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830, and is apparently a distinct species closely similar to H. caerulescens (Stein, 1910) (Pont 1989 b: 686). It has three postsutural dorsocentral setae (a fortuitous fourth seta is present on one side), dark halteres and white calypters, and differs from H. caerulescens by the dense anteroventral to posterior setulae on hind tibia. It was redescribed by Albuquerque (1950 b: 2, 3, figs 3, 4). The 3 ♀♀ are apparently conspecific.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF8BFFF7D1E9FD8DFBAB91A3.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♀♀. No syntypes have been located. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Bezzi & Stein (1907: 693) listed H. nitida as an unrecognized species of Hylemya Robineau- Desvoidy, 1830. Séguy (1937: 105), as noted above under Anthomyia nitida, listed both Hylemyia nitida and Anthomyia nitida under one entry in Hylemya. Hennig (1966 - 1976) did not mention Hylemyia nitida. Dely-Draskovits (1993: 100) listed it as an unrecognized species, giving the page reference of 321 but listing it as Anthomyia nitida. The species was described into a group of Anthomyiidae with short-plumose arista, including H. cardui (Meigen, 1826), H. longula (Fallén, 1824) and H. coarctata (Fallén, 1825). Macquart’s description is of a ♀ that is shining black with greenish reflections, and with wing-veins bordered with yellow, and, following a suggestion from Dr V. Michelsen (pers. comm.), this is synonymized with Chirosia flavipennis (Fallén, 1823) (n. syn.).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF8AFFF6D3BAFCFBFE179185.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of unsexed specimens. No syntypes have been located. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Bezzi & Stein (1907: 628) and Hennig (1962 b: 668) have treated this name as a doubtful synonym of Trichopticoides decolor (Fallén, 1824) (now correctly called Drymeia vicana (Harris, 1780 )), but I see no reason for disputing this synonymy and have accepted it as fully established (Pont 1986 b: 73).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF8AFFF6D011FE9FFB5E91EE.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There is 1 ♂ syntype in MNHN under no. 2399 of the Macquart collection. It has the accession no. 3.47 (Tasmania, collector Verreaux) and it is labelled by Macquart “ Aricia / olivacea / ♂. Macq. n. sp. ”. It is rather mouldy and quite damaged: antennae, both mid tarsi, and both hind legs missing; right wing broken at base and very loose; thorax and head rubbed. It was designated as lectotype by Albuquerque (loc. cit.). CURRENT IDENTITY. — Albuquerque (1950 a: 242 - 244, figs 5, 6) assigned this species to the genus Helina Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830, and gave a redescription. The species is correctly placed in Helina as currently understood (Pont 1989 b: 686), and appears to be a distinct species close to H. micans Malloch, 1922, and H. aeneiventris Malloch, 1922, according to Malloch’s (1925) key: calypters and halteres pale, three postsutural dorsocentral setae, well-developed presutural acrostichal setae (scars only), foretibia without a posterior seta, palpi black, meron setulose below spiracle, posterior spiracle with setae on hind margin. In colour and general habitus, it resembles H. micans or H. subpubescens (Macquart, 1847). It differs from H. micans and H. aeneiventris most obviously by the much narrower frons, which at narrowest point is hardly broader than diameter of anterior ocellus.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF8AFFF6D3A4FF1BFEE59647.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♂♂. There are no syntypes in MHNL, but Hennig (1976: 924) located 1 ♂ in MNHN labelled by Macquart as “ N °. 91, / Anthomyia / obscura ”. He referred to this as probably the “ Holotypus ”, and this statement should be interpreted as lectotype designation by inference. The lectotype is not fully hardened, with right foreleg and right hind leg missing. The abdomen has been removed and dissected by Hennig, and mounted on two slides. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Hennig (loc. cit.) identified the lectotype as a ♂ of Heterostylodes pratensis (Meigen, 1826), but according to Dr V. Michelsen (pers. comm.) it actually represents a good species of the genus Heterostylodes Hennig, 1967.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF8AFFF6D389FB3DFC18946B.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♂♂. No material was found in MHNL, though Stein (1903: 294) wrote that a syntype for study from MHNL was sent to him. There is 1 ♂ syntype in MNHN. It is rather mouldy and damaged, with left mid leg missing. It is labelled by Macquart “ 302. bis ” and “ obscuripennis ”. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — The name is treated as a junior synonym of Hydrotaea dentipes (Fabricius, 1805) in the standard works (Bezzi & Stein 1907: 651; Hennig 1962 c: 720; Pont 1986 b: 77), and this synonymy has been confirmed from the lectotype.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF8AFFF9D1E1FB20FD6E965D.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of unsexed specimens. Macquart (1850 c: 532) recorded this species as present in the MHNL collection. There are 2 ♀♀ syntypes in MHNL, one of which was seen but not studied by Hennig (1964 c: 1074). One is in box F of the Macquart collection. It is damp; both mid legs missing; abdomen fractured between segments 4 and 5. It stands over the drawer label “ A. orthonevra / Macq. Lille ”. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. The 2 nd ♀ is in the last (unnumbered) box of the Macquart collection. It is a fragmentary ♀, and has been almost completely devoured by beetle larvae. It is labelled “ A. orthonevra / nob / L. [Lille] ”. I have labelled it as paralectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Bezzi & Stein (1907: 649) and Hennig (1956: 135) have treated this name as a doubtful synonym of Mydaea urbana (Meigen, 1826). However, the lectotype is clearly identical with Mydaea detrita (Zetterstedt, 1845) of Hennig (loc. cit.) and replaces this name (Pont 1986 b: 157; Gregor et al. 2002: 151). The paralectotype is also a species of Mydaea Robineau- Desvoidy, 1830, but cannot be identified. The lectotype has some of the aristal hairs broken off, but on one arista the hairs are as long as in typical Mydaea detrita and not short as in Mydaea deserta (Zetterstedt, 1845), another similar yellow-legged species. In any case, the palpi are not swollen as they are in M. deserta. As in some other material of M. detrita that I have seen, the base of vein R 4 + 5 is bare above. Other features of the lectotype include prealar much longer than second notopleural seta, katepisternal setae 1 + 2, foretibia without submedian seta, basicosta and trochanters yellow.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF85FFF9D1E2FEB9FB9B97A9.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♀♀. No syntypes have been located. CURRENT IDENTITY. — This name has been synonymized with Leucophora cinerea Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830, by Bezzi & Stein (1907: 699, as albiseta (Roser, 1840 )), Hennig (1967 a: 116) and Dely-Draskovits (1993: 69), and there is no reason to dispute this synonymy.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF85FFF9D3B3FC94FC389401.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There is 1 ♂ syntype in MNHN, under no. 1883 of the Macquart collection. It has the accession no. 9522.34 and an old hand-written tag “ 26 ”. These figures refer to a collection made by d’Orbigny in South America. In d’Orbigny’s catalogue, the number 9522.34 refers to material collected around Montevideo, 30 September to 15 October 1826, and no. 26 was “ sur les plantes ”. It is labelled by Macquart “ Anthomyia / ovativentris / ♂. Macq. n. sp. ”. It is not well preserved; it is rather mouldy; left antenna, left foreleg and right mid leg missing. It has been designated lectotype by Albuquerque (loc. cit.). CURRENT IDENTITY. — The lectotype was redescribed by Albuquerque (1950 c: 5, 6, figs 16 - 18), who assigned it to the genus Gymnodia Robineau-Desvoidy, 1863, an assignment which I later followed (Pont 1972: 24). However, Albuquerque described the basal node of veins R 2 + 3 and R 4 + 5 as “ com cilios ventrais e dorsais ”, and so A. ovativentris clearly belongs to Limnophora Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830, as had already been pointed out by Séguy (1937: 461; 1938: 113). I can confirm this generic assigment from study of the lectotype (see Carvalho et al. 1993: 97; 2005: 155): prosternal area totally obscured, vein R 4 + 5 setulose at base, vein R 1 bare, four postsutural dorsocentral setae, arista pubescent, sternite 1 bare, and mid tibia with one posterior seta (without trace of a second scar).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF85FFF9D1F6FCE1FB6D90F7.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Macquart described this from an unspecified number of ♂♂, stating only that he had received them from Alexander Lefebvre. This implies that the syntypes were in his own collection. In box G. 21 of the Macquart collection in MHNL, there is a long pin with an old label “ Philippines ” from which the specimen itself is lost, standing over a drawer label “ L. philippensis. / Al. Lefèbvre, Philipp. ”. This must have been a syntype, probably unique. Neither Aubertin (1932: 141; 1933: 430) nor Emden (1965: 124) saw any type-material, nor have I located any further specimens in MNHN, BMNH or OUMNH. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Aubertin (loc. cit.) and Emden (loc. cit.) synonymized this name with the common Oriental species Orthellia coerulea (Wiedemann, 1819) (now known as Neomyia timorensis (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 )), and I see no reason for not following this.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF85FFF8D1E3FA2BFE2197D9.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There is 1 ♂ in MNHN, under no. 1886 of the Macquart collection. It has the accession no. 9.43 (Brazil, Minas Gerais, collector Claussen), and is labelled by Macquart “ Leucomelina / pica. ♂. / Macq. n. g., n. sp. ”. It has the right wing missing, but is otherwise in good condition. It was designated lectotype by Albuquerque (loc. cit.). CURRENT IDENTITY. — Albuquerque (1950 c: 1, 2, figs 1 - 6) redescribed the lectotype and placed the species in the genus Limnophora Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830, an assignment that is correct (Pont 1972: 29; Carvalho et al. 1993: 98; 2005: 156). The lectotype has the prosternum setulose, vein R 4 + 5 setulose at base, vein R 1 bare, mid tibia with one posterior seta, four postsutural dorsocentral setae, combined aristal pubescence just over half width of postpedicel, and frons at narrowest point slightly broader than width of postpedicel.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF84FFF8D3F5FD10FD8D9024.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from a single ♂ that hatched from a larva collected on 15 March 1851 by Auguste Sallé from a tumour on the wing-membrane of the bird Picus striatus Gmelin, 1789 (now known as Melanerpes striatus (Statius Müller, 1776), the Hispaniolan woodpecker). Macquart did not state where the specimen was deposited, and it has not been located. CURRENT IDENTITY. — The species has been assigned to Philornis Meinert, 1890, a Neotropical genus in which the larvae of many species live as subcutaneous parasites of nestling birds (e. g., Carvalho et al. 2005: 67). Problems involved with the identity of this species have recently been discussed by Couri et al. (2009). In the absence of a holotype, it is impossible for this species to be recognized and a neotype will eventually have to be designated.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF84FFF8D3BCFA5AFBD6916A.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There is 1 ♂ under no. 1875 of the Macquart collection in MNHN. It has no accession disc, but has a printed label with the data “ Museum Paris / Magellan / Dumont d’Urville 1841 ”, and is labelled by Macquart “ Brachypalpus / pilosus. ♂. / Macq. n. g., n. sp. ”. It is considerably damaged: left antenna, left wing, part of right wing, left foreleg, and both mid legs missing. It was listed by Albuquerque (loc. cit.) as “ holótipo ♂ ”, and this statement has to be interpreted as lectotype designation by inference. It was also studied by Pont (1967: 186). CURRENT IDENTITY. — Albuquerque (1951: 7 - 9, figs 9 - 14) was the first to point out that this is a South American species, and he identified it as a good species of Palpibracus Rondani, 1864 (syns: Brachypalpus Macquart, 1851, preocc., and Darwinomyia Malloch, 1922), close to P. chilensis (Bigot, 1885). On the basis of Albuquerque’s redescription, Carvalho (1989 a: 331, 347) included the species in a revision of Palpibracus, but he was not able to see the species itself. I was able to borrow the lectotype and study it in the BMNH, where I could compare it with virtually all the species of Palpibracus included in the revisions of Malloch (1934) and Carvalho (1989 a). In spite of the absence of the mid legs, the lectotype can be identified as P. reynoldsi (Malloch, 1934), and this synonymy has been recorded by Carvalho et al. (1993: 30; 2005: 57). The lectotype of P. pilosus has the eyes very long-haired; hind tibia with posteroventral hairs only on apical half; hind femur yellow on basal quarter and at tip; hind tibia yellow at base and on apical third. These are all characteristic features of P. reynoldsi, which was described from Tierra del Fuego Island and has also been recorded from Santa Cruz province (Argentina) and Magallanes province (Chile) (Carvalho 1989 a: 349).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF84FFFBD1C9FB9FFDBD94D1.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There is 1 ♂ syntype in MNHN, under no. 1199 of the Macquart collection. It has the accession no. 2367.41, which refers to a collection from New York sent by Mr Harper. Séguy (1938: 120) has also given the locality as New York. It is labelled by Macquart “ Anthomyia / propinqua / ♂. Macq. n. sp. ”. It is rather mouldy, with left foreleg missing, but otherwise in good condition. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. With the lectotype there are 2 ♀♀, but as Macquart only described the ♂, they cannot be syntypes. One has the accession no. 2367.41, like the lectotype. The second has the number 9576.34, which refers to a d’Orbigny locality in Patagonia. CURRENT IDENTITY. — The name A. propinqua was included by Stein (1919: 154) in Chortophila Macquart, 1835, but was correctly recognized by Séguy (1937: 173; 1938: 120) as a junior synonym of Fannia scalaris (Fabricius, 1794). This synonymy was overlooked by Hennig (1955 - 1964) and Chillcott (1961), but was included by Huckett (1965 b: 897). According to my own study of the lectotype, this synonymy is correct. The Patagonian ♀ belongs to Limnophora Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF87FFFBD3D8FE09FD929027.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — The location of Pilate’s collection is not known, and no syntypes have been located. In the Bigot collection in OUMNH, there is a series of specimens from Mexico under the name “ S. pruinosus Macq. ”. These are not syntypes, as they are not from Texas and there is in any case no evidence that Bigot acquired Pilate’s Diptera, but they are the specimens on which Stein (1907 b: 284, 285) based his comments on “ pruinosus Bigot in litt. ”. Bigot’s drawer label, however, clearly reads “ S. pruinosus. ♂. [deleted] / Aricia id. Macq. / Mexique. J. Bigot. ”. 1 ♂ also has a Bigot provisional label “ Spilogaster. Rond / Aricia pruinosa ♂ ♀ / Macq. Mexic ”. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Huckett (1965 b: 907) included A. pruinosa as an unrecognized species of Phaonia Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830, but I placed it in the genus Polietina Schnabl & Dziedzicki, 1911 (Pont 1972: 55; Carvalho et al. 1993: 63) and, following Stein (1918: 208; 1919: 113), placed P. concinna (Wulp, 1896) in synonymy with it. In fact, the name is a junior primary homonym and cannot be used, and the name Polietina concinna is now used for this species (Couri & Carvalho 1997: 261 - 264, figs 9 - 13; Carvalho et al. 2005: 39). Of the OUMNH specimens, 7 ♂♂ and 2 ♀♀ are Polietina concinna (Wulp, 1896), 1 ♀ is Cyrtoneurina uber Giglio-Tos, 1893, and 1 ♂ is Cyrtoneuropsis steini (Snyder, 1954).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF87FFFBD1EAFD5DFC6791B9.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — As this is a replacement name, the types of Phaonia aricioidea are also the types of punctata, but Robineau-Desvoidy’s collection has been almost entirely destroyed (Evenhuis et al. 2010: 233). There is a ♂ in MNHN labelled by Macquart “ 281. bis ” and “ Aricia / punctata ”. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Bezzi & Stein (1907: 624) listed A. aricioidea as a doubtful synonym of Phaonia signata (Meigen, 1826) (now correctly called Phaonia tuguriorum (Scopoli, 1763 )), but included A. punctata as an unrecognized species of Phaonia Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 (Bezzi & Stein 1907: 622). Hennig (1963 c: 870) gave both names as doubtful synonyms of Phaonia signata. I can see no reason for disputing this synonymy, and have accepted it (Pont 1986 b: 132). The ♂ in MNHN is Phaonia tuguriorum.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF87FFFBD3C1FA5AFC719724.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — The species was described from material in the collection of the coleopterist Léon Fairmaire, most of whose Diptera were acquired by Bigot. A syntype is now in that part of the Bigot collection in the BMNH. There are no syntypes in MNHN or MHNL, nor did Patton (1923 a: 314) locate any material during his studies of Musca types. It was seen by Brauer (1899: 527, no. 259). This syntype was referred to as holotype by Pont (1973 b: 148, 149; 1990: 168), and this has to be interpreted as lectotype designation by inference. It is rather damp and mouldy, but all parts are present. It is labelled by Macquart “ Musca / pumila. ♂. / n. sp. Macq. ” and stands over Bigot’s drawer label “ M. pumila. ♂ / Australi. Macq. ”. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Musca pumila is a junior synonym of Musca vetustissima Walker, 1849 (Pont 1973 b: 147 - 149; 1989 b: 678; 1990: 168).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF87FFFAD1C6FAF0FEAA94EF.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There is 1 ♂ syntype in the Bigot collection in OUMNH. It is in very poor condition, as was noted by Stein (1907 b: 285): head, abdomen, left wing, left foreleg and both hind legs missing, and right wing torn. It is labelled by Macquart “ Coenosia / punctipennis / ♂. Macq. n. sp. ” and stands over Bigot’s drawer label “ C. punctipennis. ♂ / Java. Macq. ”. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — What remains of this specimen can be easily recognized as a ♂ of the genus Atherigona Rondani, 1856, subgenus Acritochaeta Grimshaw, 1901 (Pont 1977 b: 492; Pont & Magpayo 1995: 38): forefemur with a dorsal preapical excavation, wing-tip with a dark spot between the tips of veins R 2 + 3 and R 4 + 5, and foretarsomeres 1 - 4 with fringes of anteroventral and posteroventral setulae.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF86FFFAD1F6FD77FBC79054.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♀♀. No syntypes have been located. CURRENT IDENTITY. — This species has always been assigned to the genus Lispe Latreille, 1796, but neither Becker (1904: 66 - 67) nor Hennig (1960 b: 461) was able to make a specific identification. Since vein M is curved forward in its apical section (“ première cellule postérieure des ailes rétrécie à l’extrémité ”), L. quadrilineata must belong to the Lispe longicollis - group (Hennig 1960 a: 413). There are only two European species in this group, L. longicollis Meigen, 1826 (with yellow tibiae), and L. assimilis Wiedemann, 1824 (see the discussion under Lispe dissimilis Macquart, 1851 above). Macquart’s description agrees best with L. assimilis, and so I have synonymized Lispe quadrilineata with Lispe assimilis Wiedemann, 1824 (Pont 1986 b: 184).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF86FFFAD3C2FE23FD9F91D0.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — This specimen, described from Fairmaire’s collection, was acquired by Bigot, and is now in that part of the Bigot collection in the BMNH. It is labelled by Macquart “ Musca / pusilla. ♀ / n. sp. Macq. [? illegible] ”. CURRENT IDENTITY. — It was studied by Brauer (1899: 527) who noted that it was a tachinid or a calliphorid. Without realising that this syntype was at that time amongst unsorted Bigot material in the BMNH, I included the name in Musca Linnaeus, 1758 (Pont 1972: 7), but subsequently found this syntype and recognized it as a species of Sarcophagidae. It was sent to the late Dr Hugo de Souza Lopes for study, who reported that it probably belonged to the genus Anapunaphyto Dodge, 1968 (Lopes 1975: 541), whilst Pape (1996: 436) has placed it as an unrecognized species of the genus Tricharaea Thomson, 1869 (with which he synonymized Anapunaphyto). As a junior primary homonym, it has been given the replacement name of Musca lopesi Thompson & Pont (1994: 112).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF86FFFAD3C2FB06FCC897C2.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from both sexes from Bigot’s collection. In that part of the Bigot collection now in OUMNH there are four syntypes, which were seen by Brauer (1899: 527), and a fifth syntype (♀) has been located in MHNL. The OUMNH syntypes consist of 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀, and one very damaged specimen that is probably ♂. There are no data labels, but the good ♂ has Macquart’s label “ Musca / pusilla / ♂ ♀. Macq. n. sp. ”, and they stand over Bigot’s drawer label “ M. pusilla. 2 ♂ s. 2 ♀ s. / J. Bigot. invenit 1847 / Egyptus. Macq. ”. The ♂ with Macquart’s label has been labelled and is designated herewith as lectotype, and the remaining syntypes (1 ♂ and 2 ♀♀ in OUMNH, 1 ♀ in MHNL) have been labelled as paralectotypes. The lectotype is not fully hardened; legs twisted and head rather shrunken; left mid leg missing, but tarsomeres stuck to pin; right foretarsomeres 3 - 5 and right hind tarsomeres 3 - 5 missing. The MHNL ♀, in box G. 21 of the Macquart collection, is labelled “ M. pusilla. n. / Égypte. Bigot. ”. CURRENT IDENTITY. — The lectotype is a ♂ of the Musca sorbens Wiedemann, 1830 complex with a relatively broad frons, and the name M. pusilla Macquart, 1851, is therefore a junior synonym of Musca sorbens (Pont 1986 b: 92). The ♂ paralectotype is Musca domestica Linnaeus, 1758, whilst the 3 ♀♀ paralectotypes are all Musca sorbens.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF86FFFDD1DBFA8AFEC09616.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from material collected by Bréon on La Réunion, there are 2 ♂♂ syntypes under no. 988 of the Macquart collection in MNHN. One is labelled “ 292 ”, and “ quadrivittata ” by Macquart; the other has no labels. Both are somewhat defective. I have labelled and designate herewith the ♂ with Macquart’s label as lectotype, and the second (unlabelled) ♂ as paralectotype. The lectotype has some mould and lacks left foreleg. CURRENT IDENTITY. — These 2 ♂♂ belong to the genus Helina Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830, and are quite unlike any known Malagasy or even Afrotropical species. In fact, the lectotype has proved to be Helina reversio (Harris, 1780) and the paralectotype Helina trivittata (Zetterstedt, 1860), both of which are widespread European species. The locality given by Macquart is incorrect, and the name S. quadrivittata is now treated as a junior synonym of H. reversio (Pont 1986 b: 149). It should be noted that in the same box of the Macquart collection, under no. 991, there is a ♂ identified as Spilogaster duplicata (Meigen, 1826), i. e. what is now known as Helina reversio. It has the accession no. 4112.33, and the relevant entry in the MNHN register states that this collection came from île Bourbon (La Réunion), collected by Bréon. Beneath this, there is a note by the coleopterist E. J. B. Fleutiaux (1858 - 1951), that three Elateridae collected on La Réunion by Bréon are in fact European species. Evidently, a whole batch of European insect material was mislabelled as being from La Réunion.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF81FFFDD36EFC48FD80908D.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — The lectotype is one of 3 ♂♂ under no. 372 of the Macquart collection. It is in excellent condition; the abdomen has been removed, and the parts of the terminalia have been mounted on three slides by Hennig. It is labelled by Macquart “ N °. 92. / Anthomyia / 5 - maculata ”, and also as lectotype by Hennig. The number 92 is the serial number of the species in Macquart’s paper. The other 2 ♂♂ have been labelled as paralectotypes. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Bezzi & Stein (1907: 728) and Hennig (loc. cit.) suggested that A. quinquemaculata Macquart, 1839 was a junior synonym of Anthomyia pluvialis (Linnaeus, 1758), but it has been shown to be a good species of Anthomyia Meigen, 1803, by Michelsen (1980: 287; see also Michelsen & Baez 1985: 288).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF81FFFDD3ACF9CBFB909773.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♀♀. No syntypes have been located. In MNHN, under no. 232 of the Macquart collection, there are 2 ♂♂ and 2 ♀♀ from Algeria that Macquart identified as S. quinquemaculata for Lucas (see Macquart 1849: 490). CURRENT IDENTITY. — The name has been treated as a junior synonym of Helina clara (Meigen, 1826) in the standard works (Bezzi & Stein 1907: 637; Hennig 1957: 169; Pont 1986 b: 139), and there is no reason for disputing the synonymy with this very characteristic species. The Algerian specimens in MNHN are Helina clara.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF81FFFCD1FEFDA6FE689647.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There is 1 ♀ syntype in that part of the Bigot collection now in the BMNH. It is in poor condition: very dirty, with left foreleg, right mid leg, both hind legs and most of right wing missing. It is labelled by Macquart “ Lucilia / rectinevris / ♀. Macq. ”, and stands over Bigot’s drawer label “ S. [Somomya] rectinevris. ♀. / Lucilia. id. M. / Ins. Borbon. Macq. ”. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — The lectotype belongs to the genus Neomyia Walker, 1859, and is a junior synonym of N. peronii (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830) (syn: cyanea Fabricius, 1781, preocc.) as currently understood (Zielke 1971: 183, as cyanea) (see Pont 1980: 729). There has been considerable confusion between this name, Lucilia rectinevris Macquart, 1851, which is a Malagasy muscid, and another species described by Macquart with the same name and combination, Lucilia rectinevris Macquart, 1855, which is an Oriental calliphorid. For example, Brauer (1899: 525) combined the two names, listing two specimens in Bigot’s collection under rectinevris, from “ Insel Bourbon ”: he listed one specimen without head as a? Lucilia (this is the unique syntype of L. rectinevris Macquart, 1855, the Oriental calliphorid) and listed the second with a projecting mouth-edge as? Cosmina (this is the lectotype of L. rectinevris Macquart, 1851, the Malagasy muscid). Aubertin added to the confusion since she realised that there were two different but homonymous names involved but she failed to disentangle the material (Aubertin 1932: 143; 1933: 430): she stated that L. rectinevris of 1851 was an unrecognized species of Lucilia Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830, whilst L. rectinevris of 1855 was in part a synonym of Orthellia (now Neomyia) peronii and in part an unrecognizable (headless) Lucilia. To summarize: the lectotype of rectinevris Macquart, 1851, is in the BMNH; it is from île Bourbon (La Réunion) and is a junior synonym of Neomyia peronii (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830) (Muscidae); the syntype ♀ of L. rectinevris Macquart, 1855 is also in the BMNH and lacks a head; it is from the East Indies, and is a junior synonym of Hemipyrellia ligurriens (Wiedemann, 1830) (Calliphoridae) (J. P. Dear pers. comm.) (n. syn.). This rectinevris (of 1855) was erroneously included by me as an unrecognized species of Orthellia Robineau-Desvoidy, 1863 (now = Neomyia Walker, 1859) (Pont 1977 b: 465). Macquart himself must have been confused by this because in box H of the Macquart collection in MHNL, there is a ♂ over the name “ Lucilia / rectinevris / Ind. Bigot ” (i. e. rectinevris of 1855), which is actually the Afrotropical Neomyia peronii!	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF80FFFCD3B6F9C5FCB897A9.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There is 1 ♀ syntype in MNHN, under no. 2407 of the Macquart collection. It is slightly mouldy but is otherwise in good condition with all legs (except left hind tarsomeres 3 - 5) and setae still intact. It has a pink disc with the accession no. 2.47 (Australia, collector Verreaux), and is labelled by Macquart “ Anthomyia / rubrifrons / ♀. Macq. n. sp. ”. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Stein (1919: 154), without seeing the lectotype, gave A. rubrifrons as a doubtful synonym of Chortophila (now Adia) cinerella (Fallén, 1825), and Séguy (1937: 112) included it as a species of Hylemya Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830. In fact, A. rubrifrons belongs to the genus Delia Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830, which contains only two species in Australia (Colless 1982: 90), and Anthomyia rubrifrons is a junior synonym of Delia platura (Meigen, 1826) (see Pont 1989 a: 674). It has a short but distinct prealar seta, and 4 - 5 anterodorsal setae on hind tibia.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF80FFFCD1F6FCE1FC4593E1.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♂♂. No syntypes have been located. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Caenosia ruficornis has been treated as an unrecognized species of Coenosia Meigen, 1826, by Bezzi & Stein (1907: 742) and Hennig (1962 a: 619). In his description, Macquart notes that the antennae, face and anterior part of the frontal vitta are yellow, and that the abdomen has two pairs of dark spots; he also notes a resemblance to Coenosia decipiens Meigen, 1826 (now = Coenosia pedella (Fallén, 1825 )), which he described as having yellow legs. This combination of characters fits Coenosia litoralis (Zetterstedt, 1846) extremely well, and this is a species that occurs along the Atlantic coast of France as well as sporadically inland. The synonymy of Caenosia ruficornis Macquart, 1835, and Coenosia litoralis (Zetterstedt, 1846) was recorded by Pont (1986 b: 198). I also considered whether Caenosia ruficornis might be the same as Coenosia mollicula (Fallén, 1825), a common species that Macquart does not actually mention by name in his two works on the French Diptera. This too has postpedicel yellow. However, Macquart makes an initial division of his Caenosia into those species with haired arista and those with bare arista. Caenosia ruficornis is described in the section with bare arista, whilst Coenosia mollicula would be placed in the section with haired arista.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF80FFFCD387FCFAFDC0908D.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — As this is a replacement name, Robineau-Desvoidy’s types of littoralis are also the types of riparia. However, Robineau-Desvoidy’s collection has been largely destroyed (Evenhuis et al. 2010: 233). CURRENT IDENTITY. — Both Bezzi & Stein (1907: 622) and Hennig (1962 d: 752) placed Potamia littoralis and H. riparia as doubtful synonyms of Dendrophaonia querceti (Bouché, 1834), and Hennig recommended that the Robineau-Desvoidy name should be left as a nomen dubium in order to conserve this latter name. However, there is really no doubt at all from Robineau-Desvoidy’s description of the taxonomic characters and habits of his Potamia littoralis that he was describing what has subsequently been known as Dendrophaonia querceti, and I have accordingly synonymized Dendrophaonia Malloch, 1923, with Potamia Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830, and the species D. querceti (Bouché, 1834) with P. littoralis Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 (Pont 1986 b: 83).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF83FFFED1FEFBB9FECB9755.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — The single ♀ syntype is under no. 1853 of the Macquart collection in MNHN. It is in quite good condition: scutum rather crushed; left hind leg missing, and right mid tarsomeres enveloped in glue. It has a green disc with the accession no. 9.43 (Brazil, Minas Gerais, collector Claussen), and it is labelled by Macquart “ Pyrellia / rufipalpis. ♀ / Macq. n. sp. ”. It has also been labelled “ ochrifacies ” by Albuquerque. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Pyrellia rufipalpis belongs to the genus Morellia Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830. It was synonymized with Morellia ochricornis (Wiedemann, 1830) by Albuquerque (1956: 33), and I originally followed this synonymy (Pont 1972: 9). Subsequent study of the lectotype, however, showed that Albuquerque’s manuscript identification as M. ochrifacies (Rondani, 1850) is in fact correct. Morellia rufipalpis (Macquart, 1851) (and M. ochrifacies) is a junior synonym of Morellia violacea (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830) (Carvalho et al. 1993: 13; 2005: 21). It is a species with a posteroventral seta on mid tibia, prosternum setulose, postpronotal lobes dark, palpi and antennae orange, wings clear except across humeral cross-vein, presutural dorsocentrals absent, wing-membrane entirely covered with microtrichia, and calypters dark.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF83FFFFD3ACFA5AFCAA97D9.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Macquart did not state where his material of A. rufiguttata was deposited, but in MNHN there is 1 ♀ under no. 1867 of the Macquart collection which is clearly a syntype. It is in very good condition, with just one tarsomere (left mid leg) missing. It has an old hand-written tag “ 7 ”; the accession no. 4.44 (Brazil, Bahia, collector Verreaux); and Macquart’s label “ Aricia / rufoguttata. [sic] / ♀. Macq. n. sp. ”. It was listed as the lectotype by Albuquerque (1951: 4). CURRENT IDENTITY. — The lectotype was redescribed by Albuquerque (1951: 1 - 4, figs 1 - 7) who placed it in the genus Airalips Snyder, 1949 (now a synonym of Helina Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830). Since then, Aricia rufiguttata has been redescribed and the terminalia of both sexes illustrated by Albuquerque & Lopes (1979: 520 - 523, figs 1 - 8), and the name Spilogaster plumata Stein, 1904 was placed as a junior synonym of A. rufiguttata (see also Carvalho et al. 1993: 66). The species is now placed in the genus Helina Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 (Carvalho et al. 2005: 122).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF83FFFFD3B8FF1BFEAC9616.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There is 1 ♀ syntype in the Bigot collection in OUMNH. It is in poor condition, as was noted by Stein (1907 b: 286): rather damp, and re-pinned at some time; most setae rubbed off; antennae, left foreleg, left mid leg and right foretibia + tarsus missing; abdomen and wings dirty. It is labelled by Macquart “ Limnophora / ruficoxis / ♀. Macq. n. sp. ”, and stands over a Bigot drawer label reading “ L. ruficoxis. ♀. / Austral. (Adélaïde). Macq. ”. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Despite its poor condition, the lectotype can be recognized by the four postsutural dorsocentral setae, clouded cross-veins, general form, and enlarged scale-like extension at the tip of the forefemur as being Helina addita (Walker, 1849), and the synonymy of Limnophora ruficoxis with Helina addita was recorded by Pont (1989 b: 685).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF83FFFFD3D9FC4BFD9B9024.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There is 1 ♀ syntype in MNHN, under no. 702 of the Macquart collection. It is in poor condition: head, abdomen, left mid leg and right hind leg missing; it is dirty, and the remaining legs are twisted. The labels include Macquart’s “ Musca / rufifrons ”, and a label in Bosc’s hand “ M. / n. Java. ”. I have previously referred to it as the holotype (Pont 1967: 188), and this statement has to be interpreted as lectotype designation by inference. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Musca rufifrons is a junior synonym of Musca domestica Linnaeus, 1758 (Pont 1967: 188).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF83FFFFD1E6FD11FC749100.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♂♂. No syntypes have been located. CURRENT IDENTITY. — This has always been treated as a good species of Phaonia Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 (e. g., Hennig 1963 b: 862; d’Assis-Fonseca 1968: 21, 27; Gregor et al. 2002: 125), and there is no reason for not continuing to do so.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF82FFE1D1E7FD8DFD899401.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There is 1 ♂ syntype in MNHN, under no. 1890 of the Macquart collection. It is dirty and somewhat fractured, with the wings rolled up; left foretarsomeres missing. It has an old hand-written tag “ 27 ”, and the accession no. 9523.34. It is also labelled by Macquart “ Choetura / rufipes. ♂. / Macq. n. g., n. sp. ”. It was listed as the lectotype by Albuquerque (loc. cit.). The accessions no. 9523.34 refers to material collected by d’Orbigny, and under this number in the d’Orbigny catalogue there is an entry for “ no. 27, sur les plantes ”, for a collection made from 30 September to 15 October 1826 around Montevideo. Maldonado is about 100 km east of Montevideo. With the lectotype there is a ♀ of an acalyptrate fly which is evidently misplaced and has nothing to do with the lectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Stein (1919) did not recognize this as muscid, but it was referred to the genus Coenosia Meigen, 1826 by Séguy (1952: 6). Albuquerque (1949: 439, 440, figs 1, 2) had earlier redescribed the lectotype and, considering Macquart’s generic name Choetura to be preoccupied, proposed the replacement name Macquartiopsis. I subsequently referred C. rufipes to the genus Coenosia and, as it thereby became a junior secondary homonym, proposed the replacement name Coenosia macquarti (Pont 1972: 43). Because of the presence of a posterodorsal preapical seta on hind femur (in addition to the dorsal and anterodorsal), two postsutural intra-alar setae (but anterior one very reduced), and large lower calypter, this species belongs to the genus Neodexiopsis Malloch, 1920, to which it was transferred by Carvalho et al. (1993: 127; 2005: 199). As a result, the name C. rufipes can be re-instated, but the name Choetura Macquart, 1851, should now replace the younger Neodexiopsis Malloch, 1920. In order to conserve the name of the well-known and speciose Neotropical genus Neodexiopsis, application needs to be made to the International Commission for Zoological Nomenclature for the suppression of the name Choetura Macquart.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF82FFFED3A2F9DEFBF39755.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♀♀. No syntypes have been located. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Bezzi & Stein (1907: 742) and Hennig (1962 a: 619) have listed this as an unrecognized species of Coenosia Meigen, 1826. This generic assignment seems correct and, so far as can be deduced from the diagnostic characters given by Macquart (frontal vitta dark, pale near base; legs yellow, with dark forefemur and tarsomeres), A. rufipes is conspecific with Coenosia testacea (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830), a synonymy that I have established (Pont 1986 b: 212).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF82FFFED3ADFD8DFDC990A8.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — The 3 ♀♀ syntypes, which were seen by Brauer (1899: 527) are in that part of the Bigot collection now in the BMNH. None is in particularly good condition, and they stand over Bigot’s drawer label “ P. rufipalpis. ♀. / Brazi Macq. ”. One has Macquart’s label “ Pyrellia / rufipalpis / ♀. Macq. ”. It is rather mouldy, rubbed, and damp, with tarsomeres of both hind legs missing. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. The other 2 ♀♀ are unlabelled and are also in poor condition: dirty, damp or mouldy, rubbed, and with many leg-parts missing. I have labelled them both as paralectotypes. Also in the series of rufipalpis in the Bigot collection in the BMNH, there is a ♂ labelled by Bigot as P. rufipalpis from Minas Gerais, Brazil. This is not a syntype of either Pyrellia rufipalpis Macquart, 1855, or of Pyrellia rufipalpis Macquart, 1851, and must be a later determination by Bigot. CURRENT IDENTITY. — This is a good species of Morellia Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830, and was given the replacement name Pyrellia diversipalpis by Rondani (1863: 30; 1864: 30) (see Pont 1972: 8; Carvalho et al. 1993: 11; 2005: 17). It was not recognized by Albuquerque (1956), but has been included in Pamplona’s key (1986: 648) to Neotropical species of Morellia. The BMNH ♂ is Morellia violacea (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF9DFFE1D3A3FEB9FD67914F.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There is 1 ♂ syntype in MNHN, under no. 2405 of the Macquart collection. It is not in good condition: rather mouldy, thorax rubbed, abdomen damp; right mid leg missing. It has the accession no. 2.47 (Australia, collector Verreaux), and has been labelled by Macquart “ Limnophora / rufipes. ♂. / Macq. n. sp. ”. It was listed as the lectotype by Albuquerque (1950 a: 246). A ♀ in the Bigot collection in OUMNH, studied by Stein (1907 b: 286), is not a syntype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — The lectotype was redescribed by Albuquerque (1950 a: 245, 246, figs 9, 10), who correctly assigned it to the genus Helina Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830. I have synonymized L. rufipes with Helina nigritarsis (Macquart, 1847) (see above) (Pont 1989 b: 686), a species with the mid and hind femora wholly yellow. The OUMNH ♀ also appears to be Helina nigritarsis.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF9DFFE1D1EEFDF3FB429135.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — 1 ♀ is in the Bigot collection in OUMNH. It was lent by Verrall to Stein in 1907, according to a note in Verrall’s MS list of the Diptera in the Bigot collection. It is in very poor condition: damp, mouldy, wings tattered; little recognizable detail on the head; left foretarsomeres 4 - 5, both mid legs, left hind leg and right hind tarsomeres 2 - 5 missing. It is labelled by Macquart “ Ophyra / rufipes. ♀ / n. sp. Macq. ”, and stands over Bigot’s drawer label “ O. rufipes. ♀. / Austral. Macq. ”. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Stein (1907 b: 286) saw this specimen and commented on its appalling condition. I have been able to recognize it as a species of Helina Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830, and as a junior synonym of Helina subpubescens (Macquart, 1847) (see also below) (Pont 1989 b: 686).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF9DFFE1D3A1FB82FB5C94BE.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — The single syntype is in MNHN, under no. 2408 of the Macquart collection. As previously noted (Pont 1967: 184), it is in poor condition: head, thorax, left wing, both forelegs, and left mid leg still on the pin but rather mouldy, and right foretarsomeres 4 - 5 missing; abdomen (very damp, hollowed out, tip missing), right wing, right mid leg and one hind leg mounted separately on a mount; remains of the other hind leg (femur and some tarsomeres) glued to one of the labels. It has a pink accession disc with the number 2.47, and a printed MNHN label “ Museum Paris / Tasmania / Verreaux 3 - 47 ”. It is labelled by Macquart “ Macrochoeta / rufipes. ♀ / Macq. n. g., n. sp. ”. 2.47 is the number for a collection made by Verreaux in Australia, and 3.47 for one made in Tasmania. Macquart was correct in giving the east coast of Australia as the type-locality, and I made a mistake in citing Tasmania (Pont 1967: 184, 185). This ♀ has been listed as lectotype by Albuquerque (1949: 441). CURRENT IDENTITY. — Both Séguy (1948: 169) and Albuquerque (1949: 440, 441, figs 3 - 8) have redescribed the lectotype. As I have already established (Pont 1967: 185; 1989 b: 699), this is an older name for Pygophora abnorma Paramonov, 1961 (see Crosskey 1962: 497 - 499). The genus-group name Macrochoeta Macquart, 1851 has been suppressed by the International Commission for Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN 1969, opinion 867).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF9DFFE0D1F5FB6CFE2D9770.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There is 1 ♂ in the Bigot collection in OUMNH. It is in poor condition: head rubbed, and aristae missing; left foretarsomeres, right foreleg, both mid legs, left hind tarsomeres 2 - 5, and right hind leg missing. I have removed the abdomen, macerated it, and placed it in a small vial of glycerine attached to the same pin. It is labelled by Macquart “ Orthostylum / rufipes. ♂. / n. g., n. sp. Macq. ”, and stands over Bigot’s drawer label “ O. rufipes. ♂. / Egyptus. Macq. ”. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Séguy (1952: 7) considered this to be an unrecognized species (and genus) of the	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF9CFFE0D1E0FE3CFC6390A8.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Séguy (1937: 462) stated that the type was lost, but there are 1 ♂ and 1 ♀ under no. 1862 bis of the Macquart collection in MNHN. Each has an old hand-written tag “ 19. ” and the accession no. 134.38. This refers to a collection from île de France (Mauritius) made by Desjardins, and the type-locality of America given by Macquart is an error. The ♂ is labelled by Macquart “ N °. 73. / Musca / rufiventris ”. It has the right wing, left hind tarsomeres 2 - 5, and right mid leg missing. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. The ♀ is in perfect condition, and I have labelled it as paralectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Both specimens belong to the genus Musca Linnaeus, 1758, and M. rufiventris is a junior synonym of Musca xanthomelaena Wiedemann, 1824 (see Pont 1980: 726). Before I had studied these syntypes, I had accepted the American origin of this species and incorrectly synonymized the name with Musca domestica Linnaeus, 1758 (Pont 1972: 7). The lectotype has the eye-facets strongly enlarged and the frons linear, at narrowest point, equal to one of the adjacent facets; anterior postsutural dorsocentral setae minute, hardly distinct from the ground-setulae; abdominal syntergite 1 + 2 yellow at sides, the median third occupied by a dark median vitta. The paralectotype has syntergite 1 + 2 narrowly dark medially, the median vitta dilating behind and spreading along the hind-margin; anterior postsutural dorsocentrals minute.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF9CFFE0D3D5FDA7FD8A90AB.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from the ♂ sex only, but the syntypes under no. 1878 of the Macquart collection in MNHN are 1 ♂ and 1 ♀. As already remarked in this paper, species of Lispe Latreille, 1796, were commonly mis-sexed by Macquart and other 19 th century workers. Macquart was also unsure whether the type-locality was Brazil or Chile. The ♂ has the accession no. 1941.33 and the ♀ 1945.33, both of which refer to collections made by Gaudichaud in Brazil. The ♂ has been attacked by beetle larvae, and the eyes and frons have been eaten away; left wing, left mid leg and right foretibia + tarsus missing. It has an old hand-written tag “ 312 ”, and it is labelled by Macquart “ Lispe / rufitibialis ”. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. The ♀ is in rather better condition, and I have labelled it as paralectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — This species belongs to the genus Lispe Latreille, 1796 (Carvalho et al. 2005: 159), and is a good species close to L. vilis Stein, 1911. It has palpi yellow; dorsocentrals 2 + 4; katepisternals 1 + 2; meron bare; forefemur with thick posteroventral to ventral hairs along most of length; foretibia with a short posterior seta; mid tibia with one posterodorsal but zero anterodorsal seta; hind femur with one anteroventral at middle and one at tip, and with 1 - 2 posteroventrals near base; hind tibia with one anterodorsal, one posterodorsal and one anteroventral; vein M curved forward in apical part.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF9CFFE0D3BCF9DEFCEA948A.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of unsexed specimens. No syntypes have been located. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Hylemyia rufiventris has been treated as a junior synonym of Mycophaga testacea (Gimmerthal, 1834) by Bezzi & Stein (1907: 730, as fungorum (De Geer, 1776 )), Hennig (1972: 448) and Dely-Draskovits (1993: 72), and there are no grounds for disputing this synonymy.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF9CFFE3D1E0F9DEFD9097F7.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Two syntypes, 1 ♂ and 1 ♀, are in that part of the Bigot collection now in the BMNH. Both are on identical pins, and are extremely mouldy. The ♂ is labelled by Macquart “ Musca / rufiventris / n. sp. [deleted] ”. They stand over a Bigot drawer label “ M. rufiventris. 1 ♂ 2 ♀ s / Brasil? Van Diemen.? Macq. ”. The ♂ was designated as lectotype and the ♀ as paralectotype (Pont, loc. cit.). With these two syntypes, there is a ♂ from Van Diemen’s Land (Tasmania), which is not a syntype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Brauer (1899: 528, no. 268) studied these specimens and thought that they might be Musca domestica Linnaeus, 1758. This synonymy has been confirmed (Pont 1972: 7; Carvalho et al. 1993: 17; 2005: 26). The Tasmanian ♂ is also Musca domestica.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF9FFFE3D38FFD2AFC5A94D0.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There are two syntypes, 1 ♂ and 1 ♀, in the Bigot collection in OUMNH. They stand over Bigot’s drawer label “ H. [Hydrophoria] rufofasciata. ♀. / Anthom. id. Macq. / Île Bourbon. J. Bigot. ”. The ♂ has been labelled “ ♂ ” by Bigot. It is in very poor condition: mouldy and dirty; both hind legs and most of abdomen missing; right wing glued back on neck. The ♀ is labelled by Macquart “ Anthomyia / rufofasciata / ♂ ♀. Macq. n. sp. ”, and is also in poor condition. I have labelled and designate herewith the ♂ as lectotype and the ♀ as paralectotype. Stein (1907 b: 286) also studied one of these specimens and could only comment that “ das Stück ist ganz zerfressen ”. With these syntypes there is a single unlabelled ♀ of Stomoxys niger Macquart, 1851, evidently misplaced and not a syntype. In OUMNH, there is a damaged ♀ labelled by Macquart as “ Anthomyia / rufofasciata / n. sp. ”. It has no data, but it is labelled “ ex coll. Bigot ”. It may well be a misplaced syntype, since Macquart described no other species as rufofasciata in the Muscoidea, and so I have labelled it as paralectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Both syntypes belong to Gymnodia Robineau-Desvoidy, 1863, and could be identical with either G. tonitrui (Wiedemann, 1824) or G. gentilis (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830), both of which are known to occur on La Réunion. Because of their poor condition, the identity of the types is difficult to determine, the more so since the venational characters given by Emden (1951: 470) are not entirely unambiguous. The ♂ lectotype has a yellow abdominal syntergite 1 + 2, and the ♀ a more broadly grey-tipped scutellum; both have a more upcurved vein M. Both appear to be Gymnodia tonitrui (Pont 1980: 734). The second OUMNH ♀ is Fannia canicularis (Linnaeus, 1761).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF9FFFE3D1E5FBB9FCF793E6.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♀♀. In box G. 21 of the Macquart collection in MHNL, there is a label reading “ L. scutellata nob. / L. [Lille] ”, but there are no specimens and the type-series is presumed to have been destroyed. CURRENT IDENTITY. — The name has been synonymized with Orthellia cornicina (Fabricius, 1781) (a species for which the correct name is now Neomyia viridescens (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 )) in the standard works (Bezzi & Stein 1907: 609; Hennig 1963 d: 933; Pont 1986 b: 101), and there is no reason to dispute this synonymy.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF9FFFE3D1CAFE09FD399100.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from the collection of M. Payen of Tournai. 1 ♂ and 2 ♀♀ syntypes were located in MHNT by the late Dr J. Verbeke and sent to me for study (Pont 1977 a: 126, 127). The ♂ was designated as lectotype and the 2 ♀♀ as paralectotypes. These specimens, along with the other types collected by Payen, are now on permanent loan to IRSNB (P. Grootaert, pers. comm.). There is a further ♂ syntype in box G. 21 of the Macquart collection in MHNL. It stands over a label “ M. Staeheleniae / St. helenia. Payen ”, and is very mouldy. I have labelled it as paralectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Study of the type-series has confirmed the existing synonymy of Musca sanctaehelenae with Musca domestica Linnaeus, 1758 (Pont 1980: 727). The MHNL ♂ is probably Musca domestica Linnaeus, 1758.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF9EFFE2D1CCFCC4FCA291D0.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♂♂. No syntypes have been located. CURRENT IDENTITY. — The species has been synonymized with Gymnodia polystigma (Meigen, 1826) by Bezzi & Stein (1907: 673), Hennig (1959: 251) and Pont (1986 b: 154), and there is no reason to dispute this synonymy, especially as Macquart’s description fits this characteristic species perfectly.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF9EFFE5D1CFFB06FE19948A.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Collected by Bigot, the single syntype is in his collection in OUMNH. It is rubbed, and the wings are rather twisted and dirty; left antenna and left hind leg missing. It is labelled by Macquart “ Anthomyia / subnitida / ♀. Macq. n. sp. ”, and stands over Bigot’s drawer label “ A. subnitida. ♀. / Jerusalem. Macq. ”. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Stein (1907 b: 288) studied this specimen and identified it as Fannia scalaris (Fabricius, 1794), and subsequent authors have accepted this synonymy (Hennig 1955 b: 81; Chillcott 1961: 62). When Stein was active, however, no characters were known for the satisfactory separation of ♀♀ of F. scalaris and Fannia incisurata (Zetterstedt, 1838). Fresh study of the lectotype of Anthomyia subnitida has shown that it is actually a ♀ of F. incisurata, and this synonymy was published by Pont (1986 a: 48). It has the upper post-ocular setulae in two rows and the parafacial broader, both of which features are diagnostic for ♀♀ of Fannia incisurata according to d’Assis-Fonseca (1968: 99).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF9EFFE2D3DDFB3CFC519792.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There are 2 ♂♂ syntypes in MNHN, under no. 993 of the Macquart collection. As already noted on several occasions in this paper, species of Lispe Latreille, 1796, were frequently mis-sexed by 19 th century workers, with the broad-fronsed ♂♂ being identified as ♀♀. Each syntype has a blue label with the accession no. 4112.33 (La Réunion, collector Bréon). One also has an old hand-written tag “ 313 ” and Macquart’s label “ Lispe / sexnotata ”. I have labelled and designate herewith the ♂ with Macquart’s label as lectotype and the 2 nd ♂ as paralectotype. The lectotype lacks left foreleg and right mid tarsomeres 3 - 5, but is otherwise in good condition. With the two syntypes there are two further specimens that are not part of the type-series. One is ♂ and one is too fragmentary even for the sex to be determined. The accession numbers are 1945.33 and 1977.33, which refer to a collection from Cairo, Egypt. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Both syntypes are conspecific and belong to a distinct species of Lispe known only from La Réunion. It is similar to the widespread Afrotropical L. niveimaculata Stein, 1906, but differs most strikingly by having dark palpi, forefemur with the row of posteroventral setae complete, lower and anterior katepisternal setae well-developed, and hind femur with 1 submedian anteroventral seta equal in length to femoral depth. The two non-syntypic specimens are conspecific and are not the same as L. sexnotata.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF9EFFE2D3A8FF1BFE0A9185.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There is 1 ♂ syntype in MNHN, under no. 982 of the Macquart collection in MNHN. It has a white disc with the data “ Senegal / Guerin ”; an old hand-written tag “ 256. bis ”; and Macquart’s label “ Musca / senegalensis. ”. It is in poor condition: some mould; legs (except left foreleg), abdomen and left arista missing; head and thorax rubbed. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — The name has been synonymized by previous authors with Musca domestica Linnaeus, 1758 (e. g., Patton 1922: 417; Hennig 1964 a: 999; Pont 1980: 727), but the lectotype has not been re-examined until recently. It certainly belongs to Musca domestica s. l. as it has hairs present on the proepisternal depression. It has the anterior postsutural dorsocentral setae strongly developed, equal in length to the presutural dorsocentrals (i. e. much stronger than in subsp. calleva Walker, 1849); frons broad, at narrowest point almost twice as broad as width of postpedicel; parafacial silvery pruinose. As the abdomen is missing, it is not possible to determine if it belongs to subsp. curviforceps Saccà & Rivosecchi, 1956, which is defined morphologically by the shape of the ♂ surstylus. In order to maintain the existing and universally-accepted nomenclature, the best course is to identify Musca senegalensis with subsp. domestica, which is not endemic to the Afrotropical region but which in the 19 th century, as now, was constantly and inevitably introduced into coastal areas by European shipping but which was unable to maintain itself as a discrete subspecies in the face of competition from the indigenous tropical subsp. curviforceps (see Paterson 1964).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF99FFE5D3A2FE3CFBF494D0.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from the ♂ sex from Tasmania, in Bigot’s collection. The ♂ in OUMNH is therefore the only syntype extant. It was lent by Verrall to Stein in 1907, according to a note in Verrall’s MS list of the Diptera of the Bigot collection. It is rather mouldy, especially around the head; left antenna and right hind leg missing, and right wing fractured. The labels include a purple label in G. Enderlein’s hand “ Tasmanien / (Coll. Bigot) ”, and Macquart’s label “ Aricia / subpubescens. ♂ ♀. / n. sp. Macq. Tasm. ”. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. There is a ♀ with the lectotype in OUMNH. It is very damaged and dirty, and has no type-status. In MNHN, under no. 2398 of the Macquart collection, there is a ♂ standing over the name Aricia subpubescens that Albuquerque (1950 a: 245) designated as lectotype. This lectotype designation is invalid because the species was described from Bigot’s collection, not from MNHN material, and this ♂ cannot have been part of the type-series. Although Albuquerque gives “ Tasmânia (M. Bigot) ” as the data for this ♂, it has an accession no. 4.46 which refers to a collection from Tasmania sent by Jules Verreaux and received at MNHN on 19 November 1846: it is therefore extremely improbable that Macquart even saw this specimen before the publication of his description of Aricia subpubescens in 1847. Furthermore, the MNHN ♂ does not have any label in Macquart’s hand. CURRENT IDENTITY. — The lectotype is a species of Helina Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830, and Helina subpubescens is an older name for the species previously known as Helina antartica (Bigot, 1885) (Pont 1989 b: 686; 2000: 4). The OUMNH ♀ is probably conspecific, and the MNHN ♂ (redescribed by Albuquerque 1950 a: 244, 245), which lacks both mid and hind legs, is also conspecific. Stein (1907 b: 288) also studied the lectotype and concluded that it was conspecific with Ophyra rufipes Macquart, 1847 (see above). Both Aricia subpubescens and Ophyra rufipes were described on the same page by Macquart (1847 a: 86; 1847 b: 102). As first reviser (Pont 1989 b: 686), I chose A. subpubescens as the valid name for this species, partly because it is described earlier on the page and partly because it is based on a ♂ lectotype in moderate condition, whereas O. rufipes is based on a ♀ lectotype in very poor condition.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF99FFE5D1EFFE09FC3196FC.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There is 1 ♀ syntype in MNHN, under no. 2392 of the Macquart collection. It is rather dirty; left foreleg and left mid tarsomeres 2 - 5 missing. The labels include a white disc with the data “ Taïti. / Durv. ”, and Macquart’s label “ N °. 72. / Musca / taitensis ”. It was referred to by me as the holotype (Pont 1967: 188), and this statement must be interpreted as lectotype designation by inference. CURRENT IDENTITY. — The name Musca taitensis is a junior synonym of Musca domestica Linnaeus, 1758 (Pont 1967: 189; 1989 b: 678).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF99FFE5D1FDFC35FD3D93E1.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — The type series, ♂ lectotype and 1 ♂ and 5 ♀♀ paralectotypes, is under no. 2389 of the Macquart collection in MNHN. Each specimen has the accession no. 13.44 (Tasmania, collector Verreaux). My statement (Pont 1973 b: 213) that one of them was labelled 18.44 must be a mis-reading of 13.44, since the number 18.44 does not exist in the MNHN register of accessions. 1 ♂ and 2 ♀♀ with accession nos 1.46, 2.47 and 3.47 were regarded as non-typical as they were acquired after publication of Macquart’s description (all collected by Verreaux, east coast of Australia and Tasmania). The lectotype lacks the right mid leg, but is otherwise in good condition. It is labelled by Macquart “ Pyrellia / tasmaniae / ♀. Macq. 1 e. Supp. ”. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Pyrellia tasmaniae Macquart, 1846, is a good species of Pyrellia Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830, and has been redescribed by Pont (1973 b: 212 - 214).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF98FFE4D3A9FB06FBA3941C.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♂♂. No syntypes have been located. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Bezzi & Stein (1907: 724), Hennig (1976: 926) and Dely-Draskovits (1993: 101) left A. tibialis as an unrecognized species of Anthomyiidae. Macquart himself compared it with his Anthomyia nitida, but A. nitida is a junior synonym of Fannia serena (Fallén, 1825) (see above). Macquart’s description of yellow femora with black tips (and dark abdomen) does not fit any known species of Fannia Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830, but does fit a number of species of Pegomya Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830. According to Dr V. Michelsen (pers. comm.), it best matches P. conformis (Fallén, 1825), and Anthomyia tibialis Macquart, 1835, is herewith synonymized with Pegomya conformis (Fallén, 1825) (n. syn.).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF98FFE4D1F4FE52FB5596E6.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — As this was proposed as a replacement name for Phorbia grisea, Robineau-Desvoidy’s types of grisea are automatically the types of tibialis. However, Robineau-Desvoidy’s collection is known to have been almost totally destroyed (Evenhuis et al. 2010: 233), and no material of his P. grisea survives. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Bezzi & Stein (1907: 708) and Hennig (1972: 451) both regarded P. grisea and C. tibialis as junior synonyms of Emmesomyia socia (Fallén, 1825), but examination of the type of E. socia showed that it had been misinterpreted and that Emmesomyia grisea (Robineau- Desvoidy, 1830) is the correct name for E. socia of authors (Michelsen 1983: 116; also Dely-Draskovits 1993: 53).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF98FFE4D3B4FF1BFDC29724.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♂♂. No syntypes have been located. CURRENT IDENTITY. — This species has been treated as a junior synonym of Phaonia trimaculata (Bouché, 1834) in the standard works (Bezzi & Stein 1907: 625; Hennig 1963 c: 885; Pont 1986 b: 132) and there is no reason for disputing this synonymy, especially as Macquart’s description fits P. trimaculata extremely well.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF98FFE4D3D1FD5DFE3091D0.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♂♂. No syntypes have been located. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Bezzi & Stein (1907: 743) and Hennig (1962 a: 619) both listed this as an unrecognized species of Coenosia Meigen, 1826. I cannot identify it positively either, but think that it is most likely the common and variable Coenosia testacea (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830) (Pont 1986 b: 212). Since it is both a junior primary homonym and a junior secondary homonym in Coenosia, its actual identity is only a formality.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF98FFE7D1E6FC18FE3F97F4.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♀♀ collected by Guyon. What may have been this species was recorded by Macquart (1850 c: 536) as present in the MHNL collection from “ Gallia ”. No syntypes have been located, even in Macquart’s own collection (MHNL) which contains other material collected by Guyon. Under no. 243 of the Macquart collection in MNHN, there is a label for this species but no material. However, this box contains the Lucas Algeria collection, and Macquart (1849: 493) wrote that this species was not collected by Lucas on his expedition. In the miscellaneous Macquart material in MNHN, I found a series of four specimens of tibialis: the first is labelled by Macquart “ 346. ” and “ Coenosia / tibialis ”, and three of them have a white disc with the accession no. 2798.34. This refers to a collection from Marseilles (southern France) made by Salzmann, and so these cannot be syntypes. These three specimens consist of 2 ♂♂ and 1 ♀ of Fucellia tergina (Zetterstedt, 1845) (Anthomyiidae). The fourth specimen is without labels, and lacks abdomen and posterior two pairs of legs. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Both Bezzi & Stein (1907: 743) and Hennig (1962 a: 619) included C. tibialis as an unrecognized species of Coenosia Meigen, 1826. Only a few species of this genus are known from North Africa, and C. tibialis differs from most of them (e. g., C. strigipes Stein, 1916, C. attenuata Stein, 1903, C. humilis Meigen, 1826, C. tigrina (Fabricius, 1775 )) by the description of “ palpes fauves ” and “ front […] antérieurement testacé ”. This description in fact fits Coenosia testacea (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830) extremely well, a species that occurs rarely in the cooler moister areas of the North African mountains such as the Moroccan High Atlas Mountains, where I collected it in 1963, and C. tibialis has been synonymized with C. testacea (Pont 1986 b: 212). The fourth MNHN specimen mentioned above appears to be a ♀ of Coenosia testacea: it has postpedicel rounded at tip, one proepisternal seta, lower calypter well developed, fore coxa and forefemur largely dark.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF9BFFE7D1A9FE82FBC79678.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There is 1 ♂ syntype from the Bigot collection in OUMNH. It is in good condition, with just a few tarsomeres missing. It is labelled by Macquart “ Anthomyia / trigono-maculata / ♂. Macq. n. sp. ” and stands over a Bigot drawer label “ A. trigono-maculata. ♂. / Egyptus. Macq. ”. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Stein (1907 b: 289) studied this ♂ and identified it as Chortophila (now Adia) cinerella (Fallén, 1825), and this synonymy has been followed by Hennig (1967 b: 162) and Dely-Draskovits (1993: 14). It has been checked and confirmed by D. M. Ackland, according to his label in the collection.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF9BFFE7D1E1FCAEFBB79073.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♂♂. No syntypes have been located. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Bezzi & Stein (1907: 726), Hennig (1976: 926) and Dely-Draskovits (1993: 101) included A. vicina as an unrecognized species of Anthomyiidae. However, Macquart’s brief description fits very well the common Botanophila fugax (Meigen, 1826), which is not mentioned by name in his paper, and I formally synonymize Anthomyia vicina Macquart, 1835 with Botanophila fugax (Meigen, 1826) (n. syn.).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF9BFFE7D3C9FD2AFC6D944C.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of both sexes. I found 2 ♂♂ syntypes in the Collection générale in MNHN, and have transferred them to no. 369 of the Macquart collection. One of them is in perfect condition: I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. It is labelled by Macquart “ N °. 89. / Lispa [sic] / tibialis ”, and 89 is the serial number for L tibialis in Macquart’s paper. The 2 nd ♂ has been labelled as paralectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Bezzi & Stein (1907: 681) and Hennig (1960 b: 456) have treated L. tibialis as a junior synonym of Lispe tentaculata (De Geer, 1776), and this synonymy appears to be correct. However, it cannot be ruled out that Lispe tibialis may be identical with Lispe draperi Séguy, 1933, recently raised from the synonymy of L. tentaculata by Vikhrev (2011: 64). Dissection of the ♂ terminalia will be necessary to establish the identity of L. tibialis. Becker (1904: 27) described a Lispe tentaculata var. canariensis, differentiating it from typical L. tentaculata principally by its dark palpi. Macquart specifically mentioned yellow palpi in his description, but in his specimens the palpi only appear yellow when held against the light. Their natural colour is brownish or brownish-orange, and even so they may have faded from an original dark brown. I do not think that the colour of the palpi, or of the tibiae, is a significant feature per se in L. tentaculata. Specimens that I have seen from 4000 m in the west Pamir Mountains (Tajikistan) have palpi equally as dark as in Canary Islands ♂♂, even though the usual colour in this species is yellow.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF9BFFE6D1FCFAA7FE3494EF.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There is 1 ♀ syntype in MNHN, under no. 1865 of the Macquart collection. It is rather dirty and has the anterior part of right pleura eaten away; left foretarsomeres 2 - 5, right foreleg, and most of abdomen missing. It has the accession no. 670.37 (Chile, collector Gay), and it is labelled by Macquart “ N °. 79. / Curtonevra / vicina. ”. I have labelled and designate it herewith as lectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Curtonevra vicina is a junior synonym of Muscina stabulans (Fallén, 1817), a synonymy first established by Stein (1919: 111) and more recently confirmed from study of the lectotype (Pont 1972: 11; Carvalho et al. 1993: 28; 2005: 54).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF9AFFE6D3C7FE22FD619184.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from both sexes, there are 2 ♂♂ and 1 ♀ syntypes under no. 1197 of the Macquart collection in MNHN. Both have the accession no. 2368.41, which refers to a collection from Martinique. Both are dirty; the one with the left hind leg missing is marginally the better, and I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype; the other, with left mid leg missing, has been labelled as paralectotype. The ♀ has the accession no. 2367.41, which refers to a collection from New York. It is labelled by Macquart “ Musca / vicina. ♀ / Macq. n. sp. ”, and I have labelled it as paralectotype. In box G. 21 of the Macquart collection in MHNL, there is 1 ♂ named as M. vicina. This is not a syntype, however, as it was collected at Hobart (Australia, Tasmania) by Le Guillou. CURRENT IDENTITY. — All three syntypes are identical with the typical subspecies of Musca domestica Linnaeus, 1758, a synonymy that has been recognized for a long time although some authors (e. g., Patton, and even more modern workers) continued to give the name “ subspecific ” rank for the narrow-fronsed tropical form of Musca d. domestica. The ♂ in MHNL is also Musca domestica.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF9AFFE6D1E9FE23FC2F908D.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — In the Macquart collection in MNHN, under no. 700, there is a ♀ muscid greenbottle standing over an unpublished Macquart name, whilst under no. 701 directly below there is a label “ violacea ” but no specimen. I think that the ♀ under no. 700 is in fact the sole syntype of Pyrellia violacea and that Macquart either changed his mind when publishing the name of the species or, subsequently discovering that violacea was preoccupied in Pyrellia Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830, gave his species a replacement name which he never published. The ♀ under no. 700 in fact agrees perfectly with the description of violacea. It has a yellow disc (the colour code for Asiatic material) and the accession no. 2108.41, which refers to a collection made in Bombay. It is labelled by Macquart “ Pyrellia / [the MS name] / ♀. Macq. n. sp. ”, all of which accords with Macquart’s labelling practice at this time. It is dusty, with right hind leg missing, but otherwise the condition is good. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Aubertin (1932: 140) did not find the type of this species, and she synonymized the name Pyrellia violacea with Orthellia chalybea (Wiedemann, 1830) (a junior primary homonym and now known as Neomyia gavisa Walker, 1859). The lectotype is in fact identical with Neomyia diffidens (Walker, 1856) (n. syn.), but does not replace this name as it is a junior homonym. It has cross-vein dm-cu in the median position between cross-vein r-m and the upcurved part of vein M (“ apical cross-vein ”), calypters pale, subcostal and discal cells extensively haired, prescutellar acrostichals not visible, prescutellar intra-alar present.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF9AFFE6D3D9FB3DFC7C94EF.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There is one syntype extant, in box G of the Macquart collection in MHNL, though Hennig (1963 d: 952, 953) reported that in response to his enquiries no types could be found. It is a fragment, evidently a ♀, lacking head and abdomen. The drawer label reads “ P. / violacea. / Macq. Lille. ”. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Séguy (1937: 399) identified Lucilia violacea as Pyrellia serena (Meigen, 1826) (now called Pyrellia rapax (Harris, 1780 )), whilst Hennig (1963 d: 952) synonymized it with some hesitation with Eudasyphora cyanicolor (Zetterstedt, 1845). The lectotype has an entirely shining scutum, and Lucilia violacea is a junior synonym of Pyrellia vivida Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 (Pont 1986 b: 103).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF9AFFE9D1B8F9C5FDCA97D9.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from both sexes from material collected by Gay. There are 1 ♂ and 3 ♀♀ syntypes under no. 1869 of the Macquart collection in MNHN. All four have the accession no. 15.43 (Chile, collector Gay), and the ♂ is also labelled by Macquart “ Brachygasterina / violaceiventris. / ♂ ♀. Macq. n. g., n. sp. ”. All four are rather mouldy and damaged. The ♂ was labelled and designated as lectotype and the 3 ♀♀ as paralectotypes by Carvalho & Pont (2006: 15, 16). The lectotype, in addition to the mould, has left mid leg, left hind leg, and right mid tarsomere 5 missing. CURRENT IDENTITY. — All four specimens are conspecific, and the species Brachygasterina violaceiventris has been correctly interpreted by modern authors (e. g., Malloch 1934: 338; Carvalho 1989 b: 477; Carvalho & Pont 2006: 14 - 16; Soares & Carvalho 2007: 425).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF95FFE9D3D3FB3DFB5E944C.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — The unique ♀ syntype is under no. 1873 of the Macquart collection in MNHN. It is in rather poor condition: mouldy, with body and head rubbed. It has a white disc with the data “ Guaratuba / ouest. mars / 1820 ”; a hand-written tag with “ 303. bis ”; and Macquart’s label “ Ophyra / virescens ”. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Ophyra virescens is a junior synonym of Hydrotaea (formerly Ophyra) aenescens (Wiedemann, 1830) as currently understood, as stated by Pont (1972: 13) and Carvalho et al. (1993: 46; 2005: 47).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF95FFE9D1E2FE82FC6D96CB.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There is 1 ♀ syntype in MNHN, under no. 2380 of the Macquart collection. It has been staged on card, and it is rather mouldy; right foreleg and right mid leg missing. The labels include a pink disc with the accession no. 2.47 (Australia, collector Verreaux), and Macquart’s label “ Lucilia / viridiceps / ♀. Macq. n. sp. ”. In my revision of Australian Muscinae, I referred to it as the holotype, and this statement must be interpreted as lectotype designation by inference. CURRENT IDENTITY. — The lectotype was studied by Aubertin (1932: 141; 1933: 431) and by Pont (1973 b: 198), and the name Lucilia viridiceps Macquart, 1851, has been synonymized with Neomyia timorensis (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF95FFE9D3A1FD10FE3B9185.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There is 1 ♂ syntype from the Bigot collection in OUMNH. It is labelled by Macquart “ Anthomyia / virescens. / ♂. Macq. n. sp. ” and stands over Bigot’s drawer label “ A. virescens. ♂. / Egyptus. Macq. ”. It is rather damp; left hind leg and some tarsomeres missing; the abdomen has become detached from the body. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Stein (1907 b: 292) studied the type and identified it with Chortophila (now Adia) cinerella (Fallén, 1825). This synonymy is correct, and has been confirmed by D. M. Ackland according to his determination label in the collection.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF95FFE8D1FCFC7FFD019773.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Macquart described this species from both sexes, collected by Guérin-Méneville on Mauritius. There has been considerable confusion over the type-material and interpretation of this name, which has appeared in the literature on Afrotropical Muscidae (e. g., Zielke 1971: 185) and on Oriental Muscidae (e. g., Hennig 1952: 90; Emden 1965: 126, 127). Aubertin (1932: 141, 144) studied what she considered to be the syntype series, and all subsequent authors have based their discussion and conclusions on her results. She regarded L. viridifrons as a good species. On page 141, she stated that the ♀♀ syntypes belonged to Orthellia (now Neomyia) indica (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830), and on page 144, she stated that the ♂♂ syntypes were a distinct species and that L. viridifrons was an older name for Orthellia (now Neomyia) trita (Walker, 1859). In a slightly later paper (Aubertin 1933: 431), she repeated that the ♀♀ syntypes were O. (now N.) indica and identified the ♂♂ syntypes as O. (now N.) trita. The four specimens upon which Aubertin based her discussion are in the Macquart collection in MNHN, under no. 975: 1) a ♂ with a red “ TYPE ” label, and a green disc with the accession no. 879.37 on reverse. This refers to a collection from Mauritius sent to MNHN by Desjardins, and so this ♂ is not a syntype. It is labelled by Macquart “ N °. 55. / Lucilia / viridifrons. ”. It is in good condition, and is identical with Neomyia boersiana (Bigot, 1877) sensu Zielke (1971: 188), which is the correct interpretation of N. boersiana according to Bigot’s type-series (in BMNH); 2) a ♂ with a red “ COTYPE ” label, and a green disc with the accession no. 134.38. This number refers to another collection from Mauritius made by Desjardins, and so this ♂ too is not a syntype. Other labels include a printed “ 956 ” and a hand-written tag “ 10 ”. Right mid leg missing. This is also a ♂ of Neomyia boersiana; 3) a ♀ with a green disc with the accession no. 879.37 (see ♂ no. 1), an old hand-written tag “ 10 ”, and a printed “ 957 ”. It is in good condition. This is not a syntype too, and this is a ♀ of Neomyia boersiana; 4) a ♀ with a printed tag “ 958 ”, and an old white disc with the data “ Reynaud / 1829 / Cal Beng ” on the reverse. This presumably means “ Calcutta, Bengal ”. It is in good condition. This is not a syntype too, and this is a ♀ of Neomyia indica (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830) sensu Emden (1965: 126). There is no other possible type-material in MNHN, nor in BMNH or OUMNH. In MHNL, in box G. 21 of the Macquart collection, there is a pin with the label “ Senegal ” over the name L. viridifrons, but as the locality is not mentioned by Macquart this too cannot have been a syntype. The conclusion must be that the type-series has been lost. In his revision of Afrotropical Muscini, Zielke (1971: 185) based his interpretation of this name on a specimen found in MNHN identified by Séguy as L. viridifrons, for the somewhat curious reason that, although the type was very probably lost (“ sehr wahrscheinlich verloren ”), it must have been seen by Séguy and used by him for his identification (“ er […] mit Sicherheit die Type […] gesehen hat und mit seiner Bestimmung vergleichen konnte ”). Zielke therefore identified L. viridifrons with a widespread and common mainland African species of Neomyia Walker, 1859, N. splendida (Adams, 1903), and replaced Adams’ well-known name with N. viridifrons. CURRENT IDENTITY. — As the syntypes are lost, any interpretation of the name must be based on the species that actually occur on the island of Mauritius, the type-locality. In collections that I have studied, there have been only two species of Neomyia from Mauritius: N. boersiana (Bigot, 1877) and N. albigena (Stein, 1913); N. splendida (Adams, 1903) does not occur there and probably never has done. Macquart’s description of L. viridifrons accords more with N. boersiana than with N. albigena. Most importantly, however, Macquart does not mention the presence of an elongate face and projecting mouth-edge in his L. viridifrons. Had it been present, he would have mentioned it: it is a striking feature of N. albigena and of N. cyanea (Fabricius, 1781) (now known as Neomyia peronii (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 )) of which Macquart (1843: 145 [1844: 302]) wrote: “ dans cette espèce, l’épistome est plus saillant que dans les autres ”. In conclusion, I have identified Neomyia viridifrons (Macquart, 1843) with N. boersiana (Bigot, 1877), and have previously recorded this synonymy (Pont 1980: 729). In Zielke’s (1971) work, N. boersiana is correctly identified but should now be called N. viridifrons, whilst his N. viridifrons should be called N. splendida (Adams, 1903).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF94FFE8D1FBFDA7FC869073.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There is 1 ♀ syntype in MNHN, under no. 2388 of the Macquart collection. It is very immature, and much of the scutum has been eaten away. The labels include a pink disc with the accession no. 2.47 (Australia, collector Verreaux), and Macquart’s label “ Pyrellia / viridifrons / ♀. Macq. n. sp. ”. In my revision of Australian Muscinae, I referred to it as the holotype, and this statement must be interpreted as lectotype designation by inference. CURRENT IDENTITY. — The name Pyrellia viridifrons is a junior synonym of Neomyia timorensis (Robineau- Desvoidy, 1830) (Pont 1973 b: 198). In the genus Neomyia Walker, 1859, it is a junior secondary homonym of Lucilia viridifrons Macquart, 1843 (the preceding species in the present paper), and for this reason was given the replacement name of Orthellia macquarti by Séguy (1941: 122).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF94FFEBD1F8FAA7FE38969B.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Macquart described this species from an unspecified number of Tasmanian ♂♂ in MNHN, and also identified a Tasmanian ♀ in Bigot’s collection as this species (“ même patrie. Collection de M. Bigot ”). A ♂ syntype is in MNHN under no. 2397 of the Macquart collection. It has the accession no. 13.44 (Tasmania, Verreaux), and is labelled by Macquart “ Aricia / viridiventris / Macq. n. sp. ”. It is dirty and rather mouldy; right foreleg missing, and both wings fractured near base. I have labelled it and designate it herewith as lectotype. Macquart’s ♀ is in the Bigot collection in OUMNH, labelled by Macquart “ Aricia / viridiventris / ♀. Macq. n. sp. ”. It is in poor condition, being rather squashed laterally and with both forelegs missing. I have labelled it as paralectotype. Albuquerque (1950 b: 1, 2, figs 1, 2) studied the MNHN ♂ but not the OUMNH ♀. He assigned this species to Helina Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830, synonymized A. coeruleigaster Macquart, 1851 with it, and gave a redescription of the species. He apparently treated the type-series of viridiventris and coeruleigaster as one series, writing of viridiventris: “ lectótipos ♂ e ♀ e 1 ♂ e 2 ♀ paralectótipos ”. This is an invalid lectotype designation for both names since neither name is restricted to a single specimen (see also under Aricia coeruleigaster above). CURRENT IDENTITY. — The lectotype of A. viridiventris is a good species of Helina Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830, belonging to the group of species around H. whitei Malloch, 1922. It has the halteres and calypters dark brown, frons narrow, presutural acrostichal setae absent, and four postsutural dorsocentrals. It appears to be conspecific with A. coeruleigaster, and it is an older name for this species (see Pont 1989 b: 686). The paralectotype ♀ appears to be Helina australasiae Malloch, 1923.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF97FFEBD3ABFBCFFE1E93E1.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♂♂. 2 ♂♂ syntypes are in MNHN, and one was studied by Hennig (1976: 926) who described it as “ wahrscheinlich der Holotypus ”; he did not see the 2 nd ♂. I have labelled the ♂ seen by Hennig and designate it herewith as lectotype. It is not fully hardened but otherwise perfectly preserved; the abdomen has been removed and mounted on a slide by Hennig. It is labelled by Macquart “ N °. 329. X / Anthomyia / vittata ”. I have labelled the 2 nd ♂ as paralectotype. It is perfectly preserved too, and labelled by Macquart “ 329 ” and “ Anthomyia / vittata ”. There is a ♀ anthomyiid with these 2 ♂♂, but it cannot be a syntype and I have not attempted an identification. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Both ♂♂ are conspecific and belong to Botanophila fugax (Meigen, 1826), a synonymy first proposed by Hennig (1976: 926, as Pegohylemyia Schnabl, 1911), though it was left as an unrecognized species by Dely-Draskovits (1993: 101).	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFF97FFEBD1C7FF1BFCD3916A.taxon	materials_examined	MATERIAL. — There are 1 ♂ and 3 ♀♀ syntypes under no. 1866 of the Macquart collection in MNHN. Albuquerque (1950 c: 2) designated the ♂ as lectotype and the 3 ♀♀ as paralectotypes. As noted by Albuquerque, the lectotype is in poor condition: head mostly eaten away and abdomen squashed; left hind tarsomeres 4 - 5, right foreleg and both mid legs missing; left wing detached and glued to a small old tag “ 35 ”. It has the accession no. 4.44 (Brazil, Bahia, collector Verreaux). The three paralectotypes are in much better condition. All have the accession no. 4.44, and each has a small tag with the numbers “ 37 ”, “ 38 ” and “ 40 ” respectively. The ♀ with no. 40 also has Macquart’s label “ Microchylum / vittatum. ♂ ♀ / Macq. n. g., n. sp. ”. CURRENT IDENTITY. — Albuquerque (1950 c: 2, 3, figs 7 - 10) redescribed the species and placed it in the genus Limnophora Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830, an assignment with which I agree (Pont 1972: 29; Carvalho et al. 1993: 99; 2005: 158). It is a species with vein R 1 bare, four postsutural dorsocentrals, sternite 1 bare, arista short-plumose, and mid tibia with one posterior seta placed well in basal half of tibia. Lopes & Couri (1987: 654, figs 28 - 32) have redescribed the ♂ and illustrated the terminalia.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFEEFF92D363FD12FE0496E9.taxon	description	Hemipyrellialigurriens (Wiedemann, 1830) rectinevris Macquart, 1855 n. syn. Lucilia meridensis Macquart, 1846	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFEEFF92D363FB6FFDD893E1.taxon	description	Fanniaincisurata (Zetterstedt, 1838) subnitida Macquart, 1851 Fannialustrator (Harris, 1780) hamata Macquart, 1835 Fanniascalaris (Fabricius, 1794) propinqua Macquart, 1851 Fanniaserena (Fallén, 1825) frontalis Macquart, 1835 nitida Macquart, 1835 Fanniasociella (Zetterstedt, 1845) geniculata Macquart, 1835, preocc.	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
0387879BFFEEFF97D1B4FE97FBC6904A.taxon	description	Anthomyia amoena (Macquart, 1851) Anthomyia chilensis (Macquart, 1851) Anthomyia limbinervis (Macquart, 1843) Anthomyialiturata (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830) caesia Macquart, 1835 n. syn. Anthomyiamonilis (Meigen, 1826) dubia Macquart, 1835 Anthomyia quinquemaculata Macquart, 1839 Botanophilafugax (Meigen, 1826) vicina Macquart, 1835 vittata Macquart, 1835 Botanophilastriolata (Fallén, 1824) angusta Macquart, 1835 n. syn. Chirosiaflavipennis (Fallén, 1823) nitida Macquart, 1835 Deliacardui (Meigen, 1826) impressitarsis Macquart, 1835 Deliaplatura (Meigen, 1826) caesia Macquart, 1835 n. syn. cana Macquart, 1835 fulviceps Macquart, 1835 n. syn. rubrifrons Macquart, 1851 Deliaradicum (Linnaeus, 1758) floccosa Macquart, 1835 frontalis Macquart, 1835 Emmesomyiagrisea (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830) geniculata Macquart, 1835 n. syn. tibialis Macquart, 1835 Fucellia calcoerata (Macquart, 1851) Fucelliamaritima (Haliday, 1838) marina Macquart, 1838 Heterostylodes obscura (Macquart, 1835) Hydrophorialancifer (Harris, 1780) caesia Macquart, 1835 Hydrophoriaruralis (Meigen, 1826) maculata Macquart, 1835 Leucophoracinerea Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 pallida Macquart, 1835 Mycophagatestacea (Gimmerthal, 1834) rufiventris Macquart, 1835 Paregleaudacula (Harris, 1780) obliqua Macquart, 1835 Pegomyaconformis (Fallén, 1825) tibialis Macquart, 1835 n. syn. Pegomyamercurialis Macquart, 1850, nomen nudum Pegomyarufina (Fallén, 1825) nigrifrons Macquart, 1835 Pegomyasolennis (Meigen, 1826) basilaris Macquart, 1835 n. syn. Pegoplataaestiva (Meigen, 1826) aestivalis Macquart, 1835 brunnipennis Macquart, 1835 n. syn. fuscipennis Macquart, 1835 n. syn. Zaphneambigua (Fallén, 1823) liturata Macquart, 1835 n. syn. Zaphnedivisa (Meigen, 1826) dispar Macquart, 1835 MUSCIDAE ATHERIGONINAE Atherigonapulla (Wiedemann, 1830) rufipes Macquart, 1851 Atherigona punctipennis (Macquart, 1851) AZELIINAE Reinwardtiini Brachygasterina violaceiventris Macquart, 1851 Muscinalevida (Harris, 1780) aperta Macquart, 1834 nigripalpis Macquart, 1834 Muscinastabulans (Fallén, 1816) australis Macquart, 1847 vicina Macquart, 1843 Palpibracus pilosus (Macquart, 1851) Passeromyia longicornis (Macquart, 1851) Philornispici (Macquart, 1854) pici Macquart, 1853 nomen nudum Psilochaetachalybea (Wiedemann, 1830) coerulea Macquart, 1843 Azeliini Australophyrarostrata (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830) analis Macquart, 1846 cyaneiventris Macquart, 1855, preocc. Drymeiavicana (Harris, 1780) obscura Macquart, 1835 Hydrotaeaaenescens (Wiedemann, 1830) virescens Macquart, 1851 Hydrotaea cyaneiventris Macquart, 1851 Hydrotaeadentipes (Fabricius, 1805) brunnipennis Macquart, 1835 obscuripennis Macquart, 1835 Hydrotaea floccosa Macquart, 1835 Hydrotaea fuscocalyptrata Macquart, 1855 Potamialittoralis Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 riparia Macquart, 1835 MUSCINAE Muscini Dasyphoraalbofasciata (Macquart, 1839) hirsutoculata Macquart, 1849 Eudasyphoracyanella (Meigen, 1826) eriophthalma Macquart, 1834 lasiophthalma Macquart, 1834 Morelliaaenescens Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 curvipes Macquart, 1834 Morelliadiversipalpis (Rondani, 1863) rufipalpis Macquart, 1855, preocc. Morelliahortorum (Fallén, 1817) caerulescens Macquart, 1834 Morelliamaculipennis (Macquart, 1846) maculipennata Macquart, 1851 Morellia micans (Macquart, 1855) Morelliaviolacea (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830) flavicornis Macquart, 1848 rufipalpis Macquart, 1851 Muscadomestica Linnaeus, 1758 analis Macquart, 1843 australis Macquart, 1843, preocc. basilaris Macquart, 1843 chilensis Macquart, 1843, preocc. frontalis Macquart, 1843, preocc. lateralis Macquart, 1834, preocc. minor Macquart, 1851, preocc. rufifrons Macquart, 1843, preocc. rufiventris Macquart, 1846, preocc. sanctaehelenae Macquart, 1848 senegalensis Macquart, 1843 taitensis Macquart, 1843 vicina Macquart, 1851 Musca gabonensis Macquart, 1855 Muscasorbens Wiedemann, 1830 pusilla Macquart, 1851, preocc. Muscatempestiva (Fallén, 1817) cuprea Macquart, 1835, preocc. Muscavetustissima Walker, 1849 pumila Macquart, 1848, preocc. Muscaxanthomelaena Wiedemann, 1830 albomaculata Macquart, 1843 dorsomaculata Macquart, 1843 rufiventris Macquart, 1843, preocc. Neomyiaaustralis (Macquart, 1848) nigriceps Macquart, 1851 Neomyia coeruleifrons (Macquart, 1851) Neomyiadiffidens (Walker, 1856) violacea Macquart, 1851 n. syn. Neomyialauta (Wiedemann, 1830) flavicalyptrata Macquart, 1848 Neomyianudissima (Loew, 1852) flavicalyptrata Macquart, 1855, preocc. Neomyiaperonii (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830) rectinevris Macquart, 1851 Neomyiatimorensis (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830) brevigaster Macquart, 1835 n. syn. philippensis Macquart, 1843 viridiceps Macquart, 1851 viridifrons Macquart, 1851, preocc. Neomyiaviridescens (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830) scutellata Macquart, 1834 Neomyiaviridifrons (Macquart, 1843) desjardinsii Macquart, 1843 n. syn. cyaniceps Séguy, 1933 Polietinaconcinna (Wulp, 1896) pruinosa Macquart, 1846, preocc. Pyrellia tasmaniae Macquart, 1846 Pyrelliavivida Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 violacea Macquart, 1834, preocc. Pyrellinamarsya (Walker, 1849) analis Macquart, 1855 Stomoxyini Stomoxyscalcitrans (Linnaeus, 1758) geniculata Macquart, 1846 Stomoxys niger Macquart, 1851 CYRTONEURININAE Cyrtoneurina cylindrica (Macquart, 1846) Cyrtoneuropsis maculipennis (Macquart, 1843) Neomuscina mexicana (Macquart, 1843) Neurotrixafelsina (Walker, 1849) fuscinevris Macquart, 1851 limbatinevris Macquart, 1851 PHAONIINAE Dichaetomyiini Alluaudinella bivittata (Macquart, 1843) Alluaudinella flavicornis (Macquart, 1855) Dichaetomyia bicolor (Macquart, 1855) Phaoniini Helinaaddita (Walker, 1849) ruficoxis Macquart, 1855 Helinaclara (Meigen, 1826) quinquemaculata Macquart, 1835 Helina dasyops (Macquart, 1843) Helina hirtipes (Macquart, 1846) Helinaimpuncta (Fallén, 1824) binotata Macquart, 1835 Helina lasiophthalma (Macquart, 1835) Helina nigrimana (Macquart, 1851) Helinanigritarsis (Macquart, 1847) rufipes Macquart, 1851, preocc. Helina nitens (Macquart, 1855) Helina nitida (Macquart, 1851) Helina olivacea (Macquart, 1851) Helinareversio (Harris, 1780) caesia Macquart, 1835 quadrivittata Macquart, 1843 Helina rufiguttata (Macquart, 1851) Helinasubpubescens (Macquart, 1847) rufipes Macquart, 1847 Helinaviridiventris (Macquart, 1846) coeruleigaster Macquart, 1851 Phaoniaaeneiventris (Zetterstedt, 1845) liturata Macquart, 1835, preocc. Phaonianymphaearum (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830) nitida Macquart, 1835 Phaoniapratensis (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830) brevivillosa Macquart, 1835 Phaonia rufipalpis (Macquart, 1835) Phaoniasubventa (Harris, 1780) discoidea Macquart, 1835 Phaoniatrimaculata (Bouché, 1834) limbinervis Macquart, 1849 tessellata Macquart, 1835 Phaoniatuguriorum (Scopoli, 1763) punctata Macquart, 1835 MYDAEINAE Dimorphiacognata (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830) flavicornis Macquart, 1843 flavicornis Macquart, 1851, preocc. Dimorphiatristis (Wiedemann, 1819) latipennis Macquart, 1843 n. syn. Graphomya analis (Macquart, 1851) Gymnodiagentilis (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830) desjardinsii Macquart, 1843 Gymnodiapolystigma (Meigen, 1826) singularis Macquart, 1835 Gymnodiatonitrui (Wiedemann, 1824) rufofasciata Macquart, 1851 Hebecnemanigra (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830) nana Macquart, 1835 Mydaea orthonevra (Macquart, 1835) Myospila bimaculata (Macquart, 1834) Myospila cyanea (Macquart, 1843) COENOSIINAE Limnophorini Heliographa javana (Macquart, 1851) Limnophora elegans Macquart, 1843 Limnophoramaculosa (Meigen, 1826) interrupta Macquart, 1835 Limnophora ovativentris (Macquart, 1851) Limnophora pica (Macquart, 1851) Limnophora vittata (Macquart, 1851) Lispeassimilis Wiedemann, 1824 quadrilineata Macquart, 1835 Lispe desjardinsii Macquart, 1851 Lispe nana Macquart, 1835 Lispenivalis Wiedemann, 1830 lineata Macquart, 1839 Lispenuba Wiedemann, 1830 dissimilis Macquart, 1851 Lispepygmaea Fallén, 1825 maculifrons Macquart, 1851 Lispe rufitibialis Macquart, 1843 Lispe sexnotata Macquart, 1843 Lispetentaculata (De Geer, 1776) tibialis Macquart, 1839 Coenosiini Anaphalantus longicornis (Macquart, 1843) Coenosiafemoralis (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830) annulipes Macquart, 1835 Coenosiaperpusilla Meigen, 1826 annulata Macquart, 1835 Coenosia ruficornis Macquart, 1835 Coenosiatestacea (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830) basilaris Macquart, 1835 n. syn. rufipes Macquart, 1835 testacea Macquart, 1835, preocc. tibialis Macquart, 1843 Cordiluroides geniculata (Macquart, 1851) Neodexiopsisannulipes (Macquart, 1843) chilensis Pont, 1972 Neodexiopsis fuscopunctata (Macquart, 1851) Neodexiopsis rufipes (Macquart, 1851) Pygophora rufipes (Macquart, 1851)	en	Pont, Adrian C. (2012): Muscoidea (Fanniidae, Anthomyiidae, Muscidae) described by P. J. M. Macquart (Insecta, Diptera). Zoosystema 34 (1): 39-111, DOI: 10.5252/z2012n1a3, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5252/z2012n1a3
