identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
038E87C0FFDF875AFF2EF8C7FB52930D.text	038E87C0FFDF875AFF2EF8C7FB52930D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Glechoma erecta Buch.	<div><p>Glechoma erecta Buch. -Ham. ex Roxb.</p> <p>REMARKS</p> <p>Roxburgh (1814) published the name G. erecta which does not constitute valid publication under Art. 38.2 Ex. 1 of the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Turland et al. 2018) because this lacked description or diagnosis or reference to a description or diagnosis, but was subsequently validated(Roxburgh 1832). Forman (1997) noted that Roxburgh specimens under this name are deposited at BR and OXF. We traced two specimens(BR0000021496585,BR0000021496608) at BR and one specimen (OXF0006375) at OXF. Further, we could trace out one more collection(K001115251) at Kew which was not cited by Forman (1997). So, we have lectotypified the name with Oxford specimen (OXF00006375) which bears the name G. erecta on the label with Roxburgh’s own handwriting and also annotation of L.L. Forman as ‘possible lectotype of glechoma erecta Buch. -Ham. ex Roxb.’.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038E87C0FFDF875AFF2EF8C7FB52930D	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Kumar, Anand;Maurya, Onkar Nath	Kumar, Anand, Maurya, Onkar Nath (2020): Typification of two accepted names and one synonym in the genus Nepeta L. Adansonia (3) 42 (11): 219-225, DOI: 10.5252/adansonia2020v42a11
038E87C0FFDF875AFC3BFA85FBF99490.text	038E87C0FFDF875AFC3BFA85FBF99490.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Glechoma indica Spreng.	<div><p>Glechoma indica Spreng.</p> <p>REMARKS</p> <p>G. indica (‘ indicum ’) was described by Sprengel (1825) who cited G. hindostana as synonym. So, the name should be illegitimate superfluous for G. hindostana under Art. 52.2 of the Code (Turland et al. 2018).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038E87C0FFDF875AFC3BFA85FBF99490	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Kumar, Anand;Maurya, Onkar Nath	Kumar, Anand, Maurya, Onkar Nath (2020): Typification of two accepted names and one synonym in the genus Nepeta L. Adansonia (3) 42 (11): 219-225, DOI: 10.5252/adansonia2020v42a11
038E87C0FFDF875AFF14FBE2FC8C9671.text	038E87C0FFDF875AFF14FBE2FC8C9671.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Nepeta hindostana (B. Heyne ex. Roth) Haines	<div><p>Nepeta hindostana (B.Heyne ex. Roth) Haines</p> <p>REMARKS</p> <p>Glechoma hindostana B.Heyne ex. Roth was described byRoth (1821) based on the collection of Benjamin Heyne from “Hindostana”.Later, Haines (1922) transferred the species to Nepeta and established the new name combination Nepeta hindostana (B.Heyne ex. Roth) Haines. According to Stafleu &amp; Cowan (1983), Roth’s herbarium and types were deposited at B while other materials are known to be present at BM, DUIS, FH, GOET, HAL, JE, LD, M, S, TCD, W &amp; WELT. We have communicated with all the aforesaid herbaria but unfortunately the type collection could not be traced. So, there is a need to choose a neotype for this name. According toStafleu &amp; Cowan (1979), Benjamin Heyne was appointed as botanist at Samalkota and assigned to Madras presidency and later superintendent at Bangalore gardens.Heyne mainly collected plants from Coimbatore and Bangalore in South India (Stewart 1982). So, we have designated a Beddome’s collection from Nilgiris district, Tamil Nadu, South India (MH00082441) housed at Botanical Survey of India, Southern Regional Centre (MH) as neotype.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038E87C0FFDF875AFF14FBE2FC8C9671	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Kumar, Anand;Maurya, Onkar Nath	Kumar, Anand, Maurya, Onkar Nath (2020): Typification of two accepted names and one synonym in the genus Nepeta L. Adansonia (3) 42 (11): 219-225, DOI: 10.5252/adansonia2020v42a11
038E87C0FFDF875AFC4BFD20FA3095B3.text	038E87C0FFDF875AFC4BFD20FA3095B3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Nepeta ruderalis Buch.	<div><p>Nepeta ruderalis Buch. -Ham. ex Benth.</p> <p>REMARKS</p> <p>Nepeta secunda Benth. was included in the Wallich’s Catalogue with three cited collections, one from Nepal (1821), one from Hurdwar (1825) and one of Nepalia origin cultivated in Calcutta Botanic Garden (Wallich 1828 -1849), but this lacked description or diagnosis or reference to a description or diagnosis and therefore does not constitute valid publication under Art. 38.2 Ex. 1 of the Code. Later, Bentham (1830) published the name N. ruderalis based on the unpublished manuscript of Buchanan-Hamilton, cited as “ N. ruderalis (Hamilt. MSS.) ” and treated N. secunda Benth., G. erecta Buch. -Ham. ex Roxb., G. hindostana B.Heyne ex.Roth and G. indicum Spreng. as synonyms. Therefore, the name N. ruderalis should be illegitimate under Art. 52.2 of the Code (Turland et al. 2018) as Bentham cited the earlier validly published name G. hindostana in synonymy.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038E87C0FFDF875AFC4BFD20FA3095B3	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Kumar, Anand;Maurya, Onkar Nath	Kumar, Anand, Maurya, Onkar Nath (2020): Typification of two accepted names and one synonym in the genus Nepeta L. Adansonia (3) 42 (11): 219-225, DOI: 10.5252/adansonia2020v42a11
038E87C0FFDF875EFCACF9E5FC879013.text	038E87C0FFDF875EFCACF9E5FC879013.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Nepeta hindostana	<div><p>Nepeta hindostana (B.Heyne ex. Roth) Haines</p> <p>In The Botany of Bihar and Orissa: 744 (1922). — Basionym: Glechoma hindostana B.Heyne ex. Roth, Novae Plantarum Species praesertim Indiae Orientalis: 258 (1821). — Neotype (designated here): India. Tamil Nadu, ‘ Neilgherries’ [Niligiris district], 1866, R.A. Beddome s.n. (neo-, MH[MH00082441 image]!) (Fig. 1).</p> <p>Glechoma indica Spreng., Systema vegetabilium, Gottingae 2: 727 (1825). ‘ indicum ’, nom. illeg. superfl.</p> <p>Nepeta ruderalis Buch. -Ham. ex Benth., Plantae Asiaticae Rariores 1: 64 (1830), nom. illeg. superfl.</p> <p>Glechomaerecta Buch.-Ham.exRoxb., FloraIndica ed.1832, 3: 7 (1832).</p> <p>LECTOTYPE (designated here). — [India, HBC]. Roxburgh s.n. (OXF [OXF00006375 image]!) (Fig. 2).</p> <p>RESIDUAL SYNTYPES. — Wallich 2122 (syn-, K [K001115251 image]!); Roxburgh s.n. (syn-, BR [BR0000021496585 image]!); “Hort. bot. Calc.” (HBC), Wallich s.n. (syn-, BR [BR0000021496608 image]!).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038E87C0FFDF875EFCACF9E5FC879013	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Kumar, Anand;Maurya, Onkar Nath	Kumar, Anand, Maurya, Onkar Nath (2020): Typification of two accepted names and one synonym in the genus Nepeta L. Adansonia (3) 42 (11): 219-225, DOI: 10.5252/adansonia2020v42a11
038E87C0FFDB875EFF10FE21FD4A9470.text	038E87C0FFDB875EFF10FE21FD4A9470.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Nepeta hindostana var. woodrowii (Cooke) Santapau	<div><p>Nepeta hindostana (B.Heyne ex Roth) Haines var. woodrowii (Cooke) Santapau</p> <p>In The Flora of Purandhar: 110 (1957). — Basionym: Nepeta ruderalis Buch. -Ham. ex Benth. var. woodrowii Cooke, Flora of the Presidency of Bombay: 473 (1906).</p> <p>LECTOTYPE (DESIGNATED HERE). — India. Maharashtra, Satara district, Panchganis Ghat, 23.IX.1902, Mr. Bhide s.n. (lecto-, K [K000911185 image]!) (Fig. 3).</p> <p>RESIDUAL SYNTYPES. — India. Maharashtra, Pune district, on the walls of Sinhagad fort, 12 miles from Poona, 29.IX.1905, Mr. Bhide s.n. (syn-, K000911186 image!); “Poona” (Pune district), V.1880, G. M. Woodrow 476 (syn-, K000911183 image!).</p> <p>REMARK</p> <p>Hooker (1885) noted under N. ruderalis that he had received the specimens collected by Mr. Woodrow from Pune district (‘Poona’) resembling the habit of N. ruderalis but with larger calyx and nutlets like N. bombaiensis Dalzell. Finally, Cooke (1906) described N. ruderalis var. woodrowii based on collection of Mr. Bhide from Sinhabad hill fort (4000 ft) near Pune district (‘Poona’), Panchgani hills (4000 ft) near Mahableshwar and Woodrow collection (No. 476) from Pune district (‘Poona’). We traced three collections (K000911183, K000911185 and K000911186) at K and we here lectotypify the name with Kew specimen (K000911185) bearing Cooke’s annotation in his own handwriting.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038E87C0FFDB875EFF10FE21FD4A9470	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Kumar, Anand;Maurya, Onkar Nath	Kumar, Anand, Maurya, Onkar Nath (2020): Typification of two accepted names and one synonym in the genus Nepeta L. Adansonia (3) 42 (11): 219-225, DOI: 10.5252/adansonia2020v42a11
