taxonID	type	description	language	source
038E87C0FFDF875AFF2EF8C7FB52930D.taxon	discussion	REMARKS Roxburgh (1814) published the name G. erecta which does not constitute valid publication under Art. 38.2 Ex. 1 of the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Turland et al. 2018) because this lacked description or diagnosis or reference to a description or diagnosis, but was subsequently validated (Roxburgh 1832). Forman (1997) noted that Roxburgh specimens under this name are deposited at BR and OXF. We traced two specimens (BR 0000021496585, BR 0000021496608) at BR and one specimen (OXF 0006375) at OXF. Further, we could trace out one more collection (K 001115251) at Kew which was not cited by Forman (1997). So, we have lectotypified the name with Oxford specimen (OXF 00006375) which bears the name G. erecta on the label with Roxburgh’s own handwriting and also annotation of L. L. Forman as ‘ possible lectotype of glechoma erecta Buch. - Ham. ex Roxb. ’.	en	Kumar, Anand, Maurya, Onkar Nath (2020): Typification of two accepted names and one synonym in the genus Nepeta L. Adansonia (3) 42 (11): 219-225, DOI: 10.5252/adansonia2020v42a11
038E87C0FFDF875AFC3BFA85FBF99490.taxon	discussion	REMARKS G. indica (‘ indicum ’) was described by Sprengel (1825) who cited G. hindostana as synonym. So, the name should be illegitimate superfluous for G. hindostana under Art. 52.2 of the Code (Turland et al. 2018).	en	Kumar, Anand, Maurya, Onkar Nath (2020): Typification of two accepted names and one synonym in the genus Nepeta L. Adansonia (3) 42 (11): 219-225, DOI: 10.5252/adansonia2020v42a11
038E87C0FFDF875AFF14FBE2FC8C9671.taxon	discussion	REMARKS	en	Kumar, Anand, Maurya, Onkar Nath (2020): Typification of two accepted names and one synonym in the genus Nepeta L. Adansonia (3) 42 (11): 219-225, DOI: 10.5252/adansonia2020v42a11
038E87C0FFDF875AFC4BFD20FA3095B3.taxon	discussion	REMARKS	en	Kumar, Anand, Maurya, Onkar Nath (2020): Typification of two accepted names and one synonym in the genus Nepeta L. Adansonia (3) 42 (11): 219-225, DOI: 10.5252/adansonia2020v42a11
038E87C0FFDB875EFF10FE21FD4A9470.taxon	materials_examined	LECTOTYPE (DESIGNATED HERE). — India. Maharashtra, Satara district, Panchganis Ghat, 23. IX. 1902, Mr. Bhide s. n. (lecto-, K [K 000911185 image]!) (Fig. 3). RESIDUAL SYNTYPES. — India. Maharashtra, Pune district, on the walls of Sinhagad fort, 12 miles from Poona, 29. IX. 1905, Mr. Bhide s. n. (syn-, K 000911186 image!); “ Poona ” (Pune district), V. 1880, G. M. Woodrow 476 (syn-, K 000911183 image!).	en	Kumar, Anand, Maurya, Onkar Nath (2020): Typification of two accepted names and one synonym in the genus Nepeta L. Adansonia (3) 42 (11): 219-225, DOI: 10.5252/adansonia2020v42a11
038E87C0FFDB875EFF10FE21FD4A9470.taxon	discussion	REMARK Hooker (1885) noted under N. ruderalis that he had received the specimens collected by Mr. Woodrow from Pune district (‘ Poona’) resembling the habit of N. ruderalis but with larger calyx and nutlets like N. bombaiensis Dalzell. Finally, Cooke (1906) described N. ruderalis var. woodrowii based on collection of Mr. Bhide from Sinhabad hill fort (4000 ft) near Pune district (‘ Poona’), Panchgani hills (4000 ft) near Mahableshwar and Woodrow collection (No. 476) from Pune district (‘ Poona’). We traced three collections (K 000911183, K 000911185 and K 000911186) at K and we here lectotypify the name with Kew specimen (K 000911185) bearing Cooke’s annotation in his own handwriting.	en	Kumar, Anand, Maurya, Onkar Nath (2020): Typification of two accepted names and one synonym in the genus Nepeta L. Adansonia (3) 42 (11): 219-225, DOI: 10.5252/adansonia2020v42a11
