identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
038F87C0FFA6FFC8FF48FEEFFEE9FB78.text	038F87C0FFA6FFC8FF48FEEFFEE9FB78.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Hydrophis atriceps Gunther 1864	<div><p>Hydrophis atriceps Günther, 1864.</p> <p>Hydrophis fasciatus atriceps was mentioned by Smith (1926) as occurring in Australian waters based on one specimen from the Australian Museum (AMR6715) and two specimens close to Australian waters (Aru Island and Kaiser Wilhelmsland, New Guinea). Cogger (1975) mentioned the same specimen as Smith, but had doubts about the locality and suggested the specimen was collected in Asian waters. Cogger also mentioned another juvenile specimen collected from Darwin (AMR14022) that he regarded as a H. fasciatus fasciatus (Schneider, 1799). We have examined the same specimen and agree with Cogger’s (1975) identification using Smith’s (1926) characters to separate the two subspecies. The identification and distribution of the two taxa remains based on Smith´s monograph from 1926, where he separated them at a subspecies level and mentioned the typical form occurs to west of the Malay Peninsula and the other form is found east of it throughout the Malay Archipelago to Australia. Smith also indicated the dividing line is in the region of Singapore, despite including a specimen from China in the western subspecies and two specimens from India and Rangoon in the eastern form. The specimen from China included by Smith in the western form (H. f. fasciatus) is the type of Hydrophis lindsayi (Gray, 1831), which antedates the name H. f. atriceps by 22 years, indicating that if the taxa are separated into two geographically distinct forms and this specimen was incorrectly assigned by Smith (1926) to H. f. fasciatus, the right name for the eastern population would be H. fasciatus lindsayi and not H. fasciatus atriceps. Later, Cogger et al. (1983) raised the two taxa to species level, referring the Australian specimens to H. atriceps. Ward (1996) assigned five specimens to H. atriceps from the northern Australian continental shelf. All the specimens were collected by prawn trawling ships (Ward, 1996).</p> <p>It seems likely the characters used by Smith (1926) and all subsequent taxonomists to separate H. fasciatus and H. atriceps -scale rows around the neck and body together with ventrals -are not useful to assign correctly all specimens to species level in this complex. Whether the name for an Australian population of the H. fasciatus complex proves to be atriceps, fasciatus or lindsayi, we regard the species to be in Australian waters based on at least one specimen from the region of Darwin (AMR14022) and the specimens mentioned by Ward (1996). We suggest using the name H. atriceps for the Australian population of this species until further taxonomic clarification.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038F87C0FFA6FFC8FF48FEEFFEE9FB78	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rasmussen, Arne Redsted;Sanders, Kate Laura;Guinea, Michael L.;Amey, Andrew P.	Rasmussen, Arne Redsted, Sanders, Kate Laura, Guinea, Michael L., Amey, Andrew P. (2014): Sea snakes in Australian waters (Serpentes: subfamilies Hydrophiinae and Laticaudinae) - a review with an updated identification key. Zootaxa 3869 (4): 351-371, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3869.4.1
038F87C0FFA6FFC8FF48FAB7FB7EF9F4.text	038F87C0FFA6FFC8FF48FAB7FB7EF9F4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Hydrophis belcheri (Gray 1849)	<div><p>Hydrophis belcheri (Gray, 1849).</p> <p>Hydrophis belcheri was described by Gray (1849) who gave the type locality “New Guinea” with no further information. Smith (1926) re-described H. belcheri based on 21 specimens mainly from the Philippines, New Guinea and Fiji Islands. Most of Smith’s H. belcheri specimens have since been reassigned to the following taxa: Hydrophis coggeri, H. czeblukovi, H. pachycercos and H. pacificus (Cogger, 1975; Kharin, 1983, 1984a; Rasmussen, Gravlund, van Nguyen, &amp; Chanhome, 2007; Rasmussen &amp; Smith, 1997). However, H. belcheri has been confirmed to occur from the Gulf of Thailand to the South China Sea (McCarthy &amp; Warrell, 1991; Rasmussen, Elmberg, et al., 2011). There is a single record of H. belcheri from Australian waters identified by Kharin and Cheblukov (2007). The specimen is an adult female (# TINRO P 40) from the Arafura Sea, collected by V.P. Cheblukov, March 1970. Cheblukov’s specimen is in good accordance with the type of H. belcheri, confirming this species’ presence in Australian waters (Kharin &amp; Cheblukov, 2007).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038F87C0FFA6FFC8FF48FAB7FB7EF9F4	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rasmussen, Arne Redsted;Sanders, Kate Laura;Guinea, Michael L.;Amey, Andrew P.	Rasmussen, Arne Redsted, Sanders, Kate Laura, Guinea, Michael L., Amey, Andrew P. (2014): Sea snakes in Australian waters (Serpentes: subfamilies Hydrophiinae and Laticaudinae) - a review with an updated identification key. Zootaxa 3869 (4): 351-371, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3869.4.1
038F87C0FFA6FFC8FF48F93BFC62F8B9.text	038F87C0FFA6FFC8FF48F93BFC62F8B9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Hydrophis caerulescens (Shaw 1802)	<div><p>Hydrophis caerulescens (Shaw, 1802).</p> <p>We have identified specimens of H. caerulescens from the northern part of Australia from the Australian Museum and the Queensland Museum. This species occurs in the Gulf of Carpentaria (Cogger, 1975; Cogger et al., 1983; David &amp; Ineich, 1999; Kharin, 2004a; Redfield, Holmes, &amp; Holmes, 1978). We therefore regard H. caerulescens as confirmed from Australian waters.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038F87C0FFA6FFC8FF48F93BFC62F8B9	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rasmussen, Arne Redsted;Sanders, Kate Laura;Guinea, Michael L.;Amey, Andrew P.	Rasmussen, Arne Redsted, Sanders, Kate Laura, Guinea, Michael L., Amey, Andrew P. (2014): Sea snakes in Australian waters (Serpentes: subfamilies Hydrophiinae and Laticaudinae) - a review with an updated identification key. Zootaxa 3869 (4): 351-371, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3869.4.1
038F87C0FFA6FFC9FF48F8F7FBD4FE23.text	038F87C0FFA6FFC9FF48F8F7FBD4FE23.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Hydrophis cyanocinctus Daudin 1803	<div><p>Hydrophis cyanocinctus Daudin, 1803 / Hydrophis pacificus Boulenger, 1896.</p> <p>Boulenger described Hydrophis pacificus based on a single specimen from “ New Britain ” in Papua New Guinea. Wall (1909) later synonymised it with H. cyanocinctus. Smith (1926) disagreed with both Boulenger and Wall and synonymised the type specimen of H. pacificus with H. belcheri. In 1972, McDowell reviewed the Hydrophis group and included the H. pacificus type in H. elegans. Three years later Cogger (1975) resurrected the type of H. pacificus and referred 13 specimens from Northern Australia to this species (ARR examined 6 of the mentioned specimens: AMS 44983, 45092 and AMNH 142394–97). Today, most authorities recognise H. pacificus as occurring in the Australian region. However, both external and internal morphological characters (ARR observation) and molecular data show the Australian population of ‘ H. pacificus ’ belongs to the same species as the eastern Asian specimens of H. cyanocinctus (Sanders, Rasmussen, et al., 2013). However, as long as the taxonomic status of the Asian specimens of H. cyanocinctus remains unclear we suggest following Cogger (1975) and using the name H. pacificus until this complex has been investigated more thoroughly.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038F87C0FFA6FFC9FF48F8F7FBD4FE23	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rasmussen, Arne Redsted;Sanders, Kate Laura;Guinea, Michael L.;Amey, Andrew P.	Rasmussen, Arne Redsted, Sanders, Kate Laura, Guinea, Michael L., Amey, Andrew P. (2014): Sea snakes in Australian waters (Serpentes: subfamilies Hydrophiinae and Laticaudinae) - a review with an updated identification key. Zootaxa 3869 (4): 351-371, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3869.4.1
038F87C0FFA7FFC9FF48FE02FDC3FBF3.text	038F87C0FFA7FFC9FF48FE02FDC3FBF3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Hydrophis inornatus (Gray 1849)	<div><p>Hydrophis inornatus (Gray, 1849).</p> <p>Hydrophis inornatus was described by Gray (1849) who gave the type locality “Indian Ocean” with no further information. The validity of Hydrophis inornatus as a species is doubtful and only the type specimen was recognized by Rasmussen (1989) in this taxon until Kharin and Czeblukov (2005) referred to a specimen collected in Australia (Arafura Sea). However, we have not found any other evidence to support Kharin and Czeblukov’s (2005) claim that it occurs in Australia. We find little similarity between Kharin and Czeblukov’s H. inornatus specimen (TINRO R11) and the type of H. inornatus (BMNH 1946.1.1.27). In particular, the maxillary bone shown in figure 2 of Kharin and Czeblukov (2005) is markedly different from that of the type of H. inornatus (see also Rasmussen, 1989; M. A. Smith, 1926); further the type does not have any spots on its body, unlike the specimen in Kharin and Czeblukov (2005). The specimen shown in Kharin and Czeblukov (2005) more closely resembles H. major in all the morphological characters mentioned, including the number of scale rows around neck and body, ventrals, subcaudals, number of teeth on maxillary bone and body form and colour pattern. Kharin and Czeblukov (2005) also included another specimen from Arafura Sea (NTMR897) mentioned by Cogger (1975) as a possible H. inornatus; however, this specimen differs in ventral scale count to H. inornatus (Cogger, 1975). We therefore include this species neither in the checklist nor in the list of possible Australian sea snakes. Another recent paper published new records for H. inornatus from the Arabian Sea (Kharin &amp; Dotsenko, 2012); however, based on photos included by the authors these specimens bear little resemblance to either the specimen from Australia or the type specimen, and instead clearly resemble Hydrophis viperinus (Schmidt, 1852) based on the diagnostic characters for this species (large ventral scales in the anterior part of the body) (Kharin &amp; Dotsenko, 2012 Figures 2 and 3).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038F87C0FFA7FFC9FF48FE02FDC3FBF3	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rasmussen, Arne Redsted;Sanders, Kate Laura;Guinea, Michael L.;Amey, Andrew P.	Rasmussen, Arne Redsted, Sanders, Kate Laura, Guinea, Michael L., Amey, Andrew P. (2014): Sea snakes in Australian waters (Serpentes: subfamilies Hydrophiinae and Laticaudinae) - a review with an updated identification key. Zootaxa 3869 (4): 351-371, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3869.4.1
038F87C0FFA7FFC9FF48FB32FE82FA9B.text	038F87C0FFA7FFC9FF48FB32FE82FA9B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Hydrophis laboutei Rasmussen and Ineich 2000	<div><p>Hydrophis laboutei Rasmussen and Ineich 2000.</p> <p>First described from the Chesterfield Reefs New Caledonia based on two specimens deposited at NHMN. We have found another specimen of H. laboutei in the collection of the Australian Museum also from Chesterfield Reefs. The type locality is not far from Australian waters so this species is likely to occur on reef complexes within eastern Australian waters (Cogger, 2007) and therefore we include it in the possible list.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038F87C0FFA7FFC9FF48FB32FE82FA9B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rasmussen, Arne Redsted;Sanders, Kate Laura;Guinea, Michael L.;Amey, Andrew P.	Rasmussen, Arne Redsted, Sanders, Kate Laura, Guinea, Michael L., Amey, Andrew P. (2014): Sea snakes in Australian waters (Serpentes: subfamilies Hydrophiinae and Laticaudinae) - a review with an updated identification key. Zootaxa 3869 (4): 351-371, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3869.4.1
038F87C0FFA7FFC9FF48FAEAFBC2F910.text	038F87C0FFA7FFC9FF48FAEAFBC2F910.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Hydrophis melanocephalus Gray 1849	<div><p>Hydrophis melanocephalus Gray, 1849.</p> <p>This species is first mentioned by McDowell (1972) and later by Cogger (1975) and Minton (1975), from the Australian region. Kharin (1984a) re-described the Australian specimens referred by McDowell to H. melanocephalus and created a new species, H. coggeri (Kharin, 1984a). Hydrophis coggeri was accepted as a valid species occurring in the Australian and Southeast Asian regions to Fiji (Cogger, 1992; Heatwole &amp; Cogger, 1994a; Ineich, 2007; Sanders, Lee, et al., 2013; Wilson &amp; Swan, 2010). The distribution of H. melanocephalus is recorded as the following: Japan, China, Taiwan, Vietnam and Sulawesi (David &amp; Ineich, 1999; Rasmussen, Elmberg, et al., 2011; Sanders, Rasmussen, et al., 2013). We have not found any specimens or other evidence to confirm H. melanocephalus in Australian waters. We therefore include this species neither in the checklist nor in the list of possible Australian sea snakes and regard all the Australian specimens referred to H. melanocephalus as belonging to the taxon H. coggeri.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038F87C0FFA7FFC9FF48FAEAFBC2F910	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rasmussen, Arne Redsted;Sanders, Kate Laura;Guinea, Michael L.;Amey, Andrew P.	Rasmussen, Arne Redsted, Sanders, Kate Laura, Guinea, Michael L., Amey, Andrew P. (2014): Sea snakes in Australian waters (Serpentes: subfamilies Hydrophiinae and Laticaudinae) - a review with an updated identification key. Zootaxa 3869 (4): 351-371, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3869.4.1
038F87C0FFA7FFC9FF48F95EFE40F876.text	038F87C0FFA7FFC9FF48F95EFE40F876.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Hydrophis melanosoma Gunther 1864	<div><p>Hydrophis melanosoma Günther, 1864.</p> <p>Shuntov (1971) suggested that 19% of the trawled specimens from shoal waters of the northwest coast of Australian belong to Hydrophis melanosoma. This claim was cited by several subsequent authors (e.g. Cogger, 1975; Cogger et al., 1983; Minton, 1975), although Cogger (1992) considered the presence of H. melanosoma in Australian waters as “uncertain”. The identifications by Shuntov lacks validation by any specimen of H. melanosoma having been collected or reported from this area since. Shuntov’s identification, in our opinion, was incorrect. We therefore exclude H. melanosoma from the checklist and the list of possible Australian sea snakes.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038F87C0FFA7FFC9FF48F95EFE40F876	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rasmussen, Arne Redsted;Sanders, Kate Laura;Guinea, Michael L.;Amey, Andrew P.	Rasmussen, Arne Redsted, Sanders, Kate Laura, Guinea, Michael L., Amey, Andrew P. (2014): Sea snakes in Australian waters (Serpentes: subfamilies Hydrophiinae and Laticaudinae) - a review with an updated identification key. Zootaxa 3869 (4): 351-371, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3869.4.1
038F87C0FFA0FFCEFF48FF22FCE6FD96.text	038F87C0FFA0FFCEFF48FF22FCE6FD96.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Hydrophis obscurus Daudin 1803	<div><p>Hydrophis obscurus Daudin, 1803 / Hydrophis vorisi Kharin, 1984.</p> <p>McDowell (1972) mentioned Hydrophis obscurus for the first time in the Australian region based on a single specimen from the east bank of the Fly River opposite Sturt Island, Papua New Guinea. Cogger (1975), Minton (1975) and Cogger et al. (1983) followed McDowell (1972) in recognising H. obscurus from Australia. However, Kharin (1984b) later described a new species, H. vorisi, based on McDowell’s description of the Fly River specimen and referred a second specimen (MCZ 141979) from the same area to this new species. Both specimens of H. vorisi are thus recorded from the southern coast of New Guinea (Kharin, 1984b, 2004b) excluding the species from Australian waters. However, we include the species in the possible Australian species list because, given this species’ occurrence on the south coast of New Guinea, it may be found in Australian waters in future.</p> <p>Concerning H. obscurus, we have found no evidence or specimens to support its occurring in the Australian region. We therefore regard H. obscurus as an Asian endemic known only from the east coast of India, Bangladesh and Myanmar (David &amp; Ineich, 1999; M. A. Smith, 1926).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038F87C0FFA0FFCEFF48FF22FCE6FD96	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rasmussen, Arne Redsted;Sanders, Kate Laura;Guinea, Michael L.;Amey, Andrew P.	Rasmussen, Arne Redsted, Sanders, Kate Laura, Guinea, Michael L., Amey, Andrew P. (2014): Sea snakes in Australian waters (Serpentes: subfamilies Hydrophiinae and Laticaudinae) - a review with an updated identification key. Zootaxa 3869 (4): 351-371, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3869.4.1
038F87C0FFA0FFCEFF48FDDEFAD5FB9E.text	038F87C0FFA0FFCEFF48FDDEFAD5FB9E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Hydrophis ornatus (Gray 1842)	<div><p>Hydrophis ornatus (Gray, 1842) / Hydrophis ocellatus Gray, 1849.</p> <p>Smith (1926) regarded H. ocellatus to be a subspecies of H. ornatus and referred Australian specimens previously included in H. ornatus to it. Later, H. o. ocellatus was raised to species level because of its distinctive DNA, colour pattern and a higher number of midbody scale rows compared with H. o. ornatus in Asia |(Rasmussen, Murphy, et al., 2011; Sanders, Lee, et al., 2013; L. A. Smith, 1974). However, the name H. ornatus is still used by most authors in Australia (Brewer et al., 2006; Cogger, 1975, 2007; Lukoschek &amp; Keogh, 2006; Wells, 2007; Wilson &amp; Swan, 2010). Hydrophis ocellatus is a widespread species found in most tropical and subtropical Australian waters (Brewer et al., 2006; Cogger, 1975, 2007; Redfield et al., 1978; L. A. Smith, 1974; Ward, 2000; Wassenberg, Milton, &amp; Burridge, 2001). We have found no specimens or been otherwise able to confirm H. ornatus occurs in Australian waters. All the records we have examined of this complex belong to H. ocellatus. It is interesting that specimens of H. ornatus but not H. ocellatus have been collected in New Caledonia waters (Ineich &amp; Rasmussen, 1997), indicating that the two species exclude each other in some regions. There is no evidence that H. ornatus does occur in Australian waters. We therefore include H ornatus neither in the checklist nor in the list of possible Australian sea snakes.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038F87C0FFA0FFCEFF48FDDEFAD5FB9E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rasmussen, Arne Redsted;Sanders, Kate Laura;Guinea, Michael L.;Amey, Andrew P.	Rasmussen, Arne Redsted, Sanders, Kate Laura, Guinea, Michael L., Amey, Andrew P. (2014): Sea snakes in Australian waters (Serpentes: subfamilies Hydrophiinae and Laticaudinae) - a review with an updated identification key. Zootaxa 3869 (4): 351-371, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3869.4.1
038F87C0FFA0FFCEFF48FBD6FD33F986.text	038F87C0FFA0FFCEFF48FBD6FD33F986.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Hydrophis schistosus Daudin 1803	<div><p>Hydrophis schistosus Daudin, 1803 / Hydrophis zweifeli (Kharin, 1985).</p> <p>McDowell (1972) mentioned a specimen from Sepik River, East Sepik District, New Guinea (AMNH 104340) that was very similar to the ‘beaked sea snake’, H. schistosus, but showed some morphological characters which were not in accordance with H. schistosus. Later Kharin (1985) described a new species, Enhydrina zweifeli, based on McDowell´s (1972) data. The similarity with H. schistosus is striking. However, a recently published paper presented molecular evidence showing the two species represent distinct lineages and are not each other’s closest relatives, indicating convergent phenotypic evolution probably related to a specialist diet of large, spiny prey (Ukuwela, de Silva, Fry, Lee, &amp; Sanders, 2012). Morphological analysis of 18 specimens from the Asian region and 12 specimens from Australia suggested the specimens in Australian waters all belong to H. zweifeli based on scale counts and colour pattern characters, thus excluding H. schistosus from Australian waters (Ukuwela, de Silva, et al., 2012). However, more molecular and morphological analyses of additional specimens are needed to determine the precise distributions of the two species (Ukuwela, de Silva, et al., 2012). Based on the above, we exclude H. schistosus from the list of sea snakes occurring in Australian waters in favour of H. zweifeli.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038F87C0FFA0FFCEFF48FBD6FD33F986	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rasmussen, Arne Redsted;Sanders, Kate Laura;Guinea, Michael L.;Amey, Andrew P.	Rasmussen, Arne Redsted, Sanders, Kate Laura, Guinea, Michael L., Amey, Andrew P. (2014): Sea snakes in Australian waters (Serpentes: subfamilies Hydrophiinae and Laticaudinae) - a review with an updated identification key. Zootaxa 3869 (4): 351-371, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3869.4.1
038F87C0FFA0FFCEFF48F9EEFD01F8E0.text	038F87C0FFA0FFCEFF48F9EEFD01F8E0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Hydrophis spiralis (Shaw 1802)	<div><p>Hydrophis spiralis (Shaw, 1802).</p> <p>Ineich and Rasmussen (1997) mentioned H. spiralis for the first time in New Caledonia, which is surprising, as it has never been collected in Australian waters. The known distributions of H. spiralis are the Persian Gulf in the west to Vietnam in the east, Indonesia including Java and Sulawesi in the south (David &amp; Ineich, 1999; Rasmussen, Elmberg, et al., 2011). Whether it was a vagrant specimen from Asia or there is a population at New Caledonia is uncertain, but with only one specimen collected from New Caledonia without precise locality (Ineich &amp; Rasmussen, 1997), we do not include it in the possible list until further specimens have confirmed its presence closer to Australian waters.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038F87C0FFA0FFCEFF48F9EEFD01F8E0	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rasmussen, Arne Redsted;Sanders, Kate Laura;Guinea, Michael L.;Amey, Andrew P.	Rasmussen, Arne Redsted, Sanders, Kate Laura, Guinea, Michael L., Amey, Andrew P. (2014): Sea snakes in Australian waters (Serpentes: subfamilies Hydrophiinae and Laticaudinae) - a review with an updated identification key. Zootaxa 3869 (4): 351-371, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3869.4.1
038F87C0FFA0FFCFFF48F8CEFE16FEEB.text	038F87C0FFA0FFCFFF48F8CEFE16FEEB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Microcephalophis gracilis (Shaw 1802)	<div><p>Microcephalophis gracilis (Shaw, 1802).</p> <p>M. gracilis is mentioned by M. A. Smith (1926) as occurring in Australia based on one specimen at the Australian Museum in Sydney (AMR6719). Cogger (1975) regarded this specimen as of doubtful provenance, but mentioned another from the Gulf of Papua (MCR142375), indicating M. gracilis does occur in Australian waters. The specimens mentioned as M. gracilis at the Museum Victoria, Melbourne turned out to be H. elegans (examined by ARR). Ineich and Rasmussen (1997) could not confirm M. gracilis in New Caledonian waters as the specimens identified by Gail and Rageau (1958) turned out to be H. coggeri. We have found no evidence to include this species in the checklist, but based on the specimen from Gulf of Papua we include it in the possible list.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038F87C0FFA0FFCFFF48F8CEFE16FEEB	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rasmussen, Arne Redsted;Sanders, Kate Laura;Guinea, Michael L.;Amey, Andrew P.	Rasmussen, Arne Redsted, Sanders, Kate Laura, Guinea, Michael L., Amey, Andrew P. (2014): Sea snakes in Australian waters (Serpentes: subfamilies Hydrophiinae and Laticaudinae) - a review with an updated identification key. Zootaxa 3869 (4): 351-371, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3869.4.1
038F87C0FFA1FFCFFF48FEDAFBE7FC0E.text	038F87C0FFA1FFCFFF48FEDAFBE7FC0E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Laticauda Laurenti 1768	<div><p>Laticauda Laurenti, 1768.</p> <p>The countries around Australia have at least six Laticauda species (Cogger &amp; Heatwole, 2006; Heatwole et al., 2005). In the literature two species are reported from Australian waters: L. colubrina and L. laticaudata (Cogger, 1975; Minton, 1975; M. A. Smith, 1926). At least 3 specimens of L. colubrina are deposited in the Australian Museum, Sydney: AMS R20883 from Sydney, R 2954 from Wollongong, and R11524 from Victorian N. Hill and one from Museum Victoria, Melbourne: D 4276 from Sydney. Three of the localities are in New South Wales and indicate the specimens are waifs, one is from inland western Victoria (the desert town Northern Hill) indicating a wrong locality. At least three Australian specimens of L. laticaudata are deposited in museum collections, one in BMNH:55.10.16.439 from Tasmania, one in ZMUC: 66265 from Sydney and one in Museum Victoria, Melbourne 60287 from Torres Strait also indicating waif specimens. We have found no further specimens reported from Australia indicating that Laticauda is not breeding in Australian waters despite there being breeding populations from surrounding countries (Bonnet, Brischoux, Pearson, &amp; Rivalan, 2009; Brischoux &amp; Bonnet, 2009). McCarthy (1986) suggests that competition from the Aipysurus species might, at least in part, be responsible for the rarity of Laticauda in Australian waters. Greer (1997) suggests that it may be due to the absence of coastal limestone rocks in northern Australia which is the preferred sheltering and egg-laying sites for these species. Further investigation in the northern part of coastal Australia is much needed before we can include Laticauda in the checklist; however, we include Laticauda sp. in the possible list.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038F87C0FFA1FFCFFF48FEDAFBE7FC0E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rasmussen, Arne Redsted;Sanders, Kate Laura;Guinea, Michael L.;Amey, Andrew P.	Rasmussen, Arne Redsted, Sanders, Kate Laura, Guinea, Michael L., Amey, Andrew P. (2014): Sea snakes in Australian waters (Serpentes: subfamilies Hydrophiinae and Laticaudinae) - a review with an updated identification key. Zootaxa 3869 (4): 351-371, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3869.4.1
038F87C0FFA2FFCCFF48FD97FA53F89F.text	038F87C0FFA2FFCCFF48FD97FA53F89F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Hydrophiinae	<div><p>Identification key to Australian sea snakes including 4 possibly</p> <p>Identifying sea snakes to species level is not an easy task. The genus Hydrophis in particular shows great interspecific and intraspecific variation and interspecific convergence making identification problematic when using only external characters. The key is based primarily on counting ventral scales and scale rows around the neck and body, but shape and size of the head and the position of the maxillary bone are other distinguishing characters.</p> <p>A combination of characters are required to identify a specimen. In using the key it is important that all the identifying characters fit with the specimen at each step in the key. If this is not the case, the alternative “not as above” should be followed. When counting scale rows around the neck and body it is important to note that the count around the neck is a minimum count and the count around the body is a maximum count (as in Smith, 1926). Record the minimum count of three or four scale rows around the neck at one and a half head lengths, two, two and a half, and three head lengths behind the head. The maximum number of body scales occurs just behind midbody, but three to four counts between midbody and vent are required. The most precise scale row count follows a transverse line across the dorsal surface of the body starting from a ventral scale to a ventral scale on the other side of the body (Thomas, 1976). Ventral scales are excluded from the count of scale rows. “Ground colour” refers to the colour between the darker dorsal markings or bands (if present), and is generally the same as the colour on the ventral side. “Bands” here refers to darkish transverse markings anywhere on the body. Drawings are by Mogens Andersen ZMUC. The nomenclature follows Sanders, Lee, et al. (2013).</p> <p>1.</p> <p>A Nasals separated by internasals (fig.1 left)........................................................... Laticauda</p> <p>B Nasals not separated by internasals (fig.1 right)............................................................. 2.</p> <p>2.</p> <p>A Three supralabials, the second very elongated (fig.2 left).................................. Emydocephalus annulatus</p> <p>B More than four supralabials (fig.2 right)................................................................... 3.</p> <p>3.</p> <p>A No preocular scale, the prefrontal borders the eye (fig.3 left)................................. Hydrelaps darwiniensis</p> <p>B Preocular scales present (fig.3 right)...................................................................... 4.</p> <p>4.</p> <p>A Ventrals small, each not more than 2 times as broad as adjacent body scales.............................................................................................. Hydrophis and Microcephalophis (21 species—key below)</p> <p>B Ventrals large, each at least 3 times as broad as adjacent body scales............................................ 5.</p> <p>5.</p> <p>A At least 28 scale rows around body...................................................... Parahydrophis mertoni</p> <p>B Less than 28 scale rows around body:..................................................................... 6.</p> <p>6.</p> <p>A Maxillary bone not extending forwards as far as palatine (fig.4 left)................................ Ephalophis greyae</p> <p>B Maxillary bone and palatine straight, or maxillary bone reaching beyond palatine (fig.4 right)................................................................................................... Aipysurus (8 species—key below)</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038F87C0FFA2FFCCFF48FD97FA53F89F	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rasmussen, Arne Redsted;Sanders, Kate Laura;Guinea, Michael L.;Amey, Andrew P.	Rasmussen, Arne Redsted, Sanders, Kate Laura, Guinea, Michael L., Amey, Andrew P. (2014): Sea snakes in Australian waters (Serpentes: subfamilies Hydrophiinae and Laticaudinae) - a review with an updated identification key. Zootaxa 3869 (4): 351-371, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3869.4.1
038F87C0FFACFFC1FF48FA4DFA54FF4C.text	038F87C0FFACFFC1FF48FA4DFA54FF4C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Aipysurus Lacepede 1804	<div><p>A key to the genus Aipysurus in Australia</p> <p>1.</p> <p>A At least 180 ventral scales......................................................................... A. tenuis B Less than 180 ventral scales............................................................................ 2. 2.</p> <p>A Ventrals with a deep notch in the posterior border (Fig.5 top).................................................. 3. B Ventrals without or with only a slight median notch on the posterior border (Fig.5 bottom)........................... 4. 3.</p> <p>A Less than 19 scale rows around midbody and without prefrontal scales (Fig.6 left)..................... A. apraefrontalis B At least 19 scale rows around midbody and with prefrontal scales (Fig.6 right).......................... A. foliosquama 4.</p> <p>A All head shields symmetrical and no supralabials divided horizontally (Fig.7 left).......................... A. mosaicus B Head shields more or less broken up and some of the supralabials divided horizontally (Fig.7 right)................... 5. 5.</p> <p>A All head shields broken up into small irregular scales (fig.8)............................................ A. duboisii B Only some of the head shields broken up, especially parietals.................................................. 6. 6.</p> <p>A At least 155 ventrals and less than 21 scale rows around midbody......................................... A. fuscus B Less than 155 ventrals and at least 21 scale rows around midbody................................ A. laevis / pooleorum</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038F87C0FFACFFC1FF48FA4DFA54FF4C	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rasmussen, Arne Redsted;Sanders, Kate Laura;Guinea, Michael L.;Amey, Andrew P.	Rasmussen, Arne Redsted, Sanders, Kate Laura, Guinea, Michael L., Amey, Andrew P. (2014): Sea snakes in Australian waters (Serpentes: subfamilies Hydrophiinae and Laticaudinae) - a review with an updated identification key. Zootaxa 3869 (4): 351-371, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3869.4.1
038F87C0FFAFFFDAFF48FE8DFA53F9CE.text	038F87C0FFAFFFDAFF48FE8DFA53F9CE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Hydrophis	<div><p>A key to the genus Hydrophis and Microcephalophis gracilis</p> <p>1.</p> <p>A Elongated mental shield several times longer than broad (Fig.9 left)...................................... H. zweifeli</p> <p>B Mental shield not much longer than broad (Fig.9 right)....................................................... 2.</p> <p>2.</p> <p>A Ventrals (except on the throat) divided into pairs of overlapping scales (Fig.10 top)......................... H. stokesii</p> <p>B Ventrals in the posterior part of body divided into pairs of not overlapping scales (Fig.10 bottom).. Microcephalophis gracilis</p> <p>C Not as above........................................................................................ 3.</p> <p>3.</p> <p>A Blunt spines on rear edge of some of the head shields (Fig.11)........................................... H. peronii</p> <p>B Not as above........................................................................................ 4.</p> <p>4.</p> <p>A Head elongated with snout bill-like and flattened, very wide gape (Fig.12), the normal colour pattern is yellow on ventral side and black on dorsal side........................................................................ H. platurus</p> <p>B Not as above........................................................................................ 5.</p> <p>5.</p> <p>A Ventrals very small and difficult to distinguish, scales in the lowermost scale rows on flanks enlarged compared to dorsal scales (Fig.13)................................................................................. H. curtus</p> <p>B Not as above........................................................................................ 6.</p> <p>6.</p> <p>A Less than 275 ventrals and less than 30 scale rows around neck................................................ 7.</p> <p>B Not as above........................................................................................ 8.</p> <p>7.</p> <p>A Between bands and on the sides two or three series of spots or dark-edged markings, head very small and body compressed posteriorly (Fig. 14)......................................................................... H. macdowelli</p> <p>B Not as above........................................................................................ 8.</p> <p>8.</p> <p>A Less than 25 scale rows around neck and more than 70 dark cross bands on body and tail....................... H. vorisi</p> <p>B Not as above........................................................................................ 9.</p> <p>9.</p> <p>A Less than 275 ventrals and less than 44 scale rows around body............................................... 10.</p> <p>B Not as above....................................................................................... 11.</p> <p>10.</p> <p>A Less than 38 bands on body and small dark spots on the sides............................................. H. major</p> <p>B Not as above....................................................................................... 11.</p> <p>11.</p> <p>A Less than 37 scale rows around body, less than 320 ventrals and more than 45 bands on body and tail................. 12.</p> <p>B Not as above....................................................................................... 13.</p> <p>12.</p> <p>A Between 57 and 69 bands on body and tail.......................................................... H. belcheri</p> <p>B Between 46 and 56 bands on body and tail.......................................................... H. donaldi</p> <p>13.</p> <p>A More than 345 ventrals and spots on the flanks and between bands (Fig. 15)............................... H. elegans</p> <p>B Not as above....................................................................................... 14.</p> <p>14.</p> <p>A Less than 285 ventrals................................................................................ 15.</p> <p>B Not as above....................................................................................... 16.</p> <p>15.</p> <p>A Less than 30 scale rows around neck and more than 41 scale rows around body............................. H. laboutei</p> <p>B Not as above....................................................................................... 16.</p> <p>16</p> <p>A More than 50 scale rows around body and one or two rows of regular black pentagonal markings on the side, primary colour dark brown to black (Fig. 16).................................................................. H. czeblukovi</p> <p>B Not as above....................................................................................... 17.</p> <p>17.</p> <p>A More than 30 scale rows around neck and body with ocelli on the sides, ground colour white (Fig.17).......... H. ocellatus</p> <p>B Not as above....................................................................................... 18.</p> <p>18.</p> <p>A More than 30 scale rows around neck, ground colour not yellow and more than 12 maxillary teeth behind fang H. caerulescens B Not as above....................................................................................... 19. 19.</p> <p>A Head small and neck elongated and body more than 3 times as broad as head.................................... 20. B Not as above....................................................................................... 22. 20.</p> <p>A A white ring around the eye and less than 5 maxillary teeth behind fang.................................... H. kingii B Not as above....................................................................................... 21. 21.</p> <p>A Less than 38 scale rows around neck.............................................................. H. coggeri B More than 38 scale rows around neck.............................................................. H. atriceps 22.</p> <p>A More than 40 bands on body and tail............................................................. H. pacificus B Less than 40 bands on body and tail............................................................... H. coggeri</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038F87C0FFAFFFDAFF48FE8DFA53F9CE	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Rasmussen, Arne Redsted;Sanders, Kate Laura;Guinea, Michael L.;Amey, Andrew P.	Rasmussen, Arne Redsted, Sanders, Kate Laura, Guinea, Michael L., Amey, Andrew P. (2014): Sea snakes in Australian waters (Serpentes: subfamilies Hydrophiinae and Laticaudinae) - a review with an updated identification key. Zootaxa 3869 (4): 351-371, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3869.4.1
