identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
038C8799985FFFF7FF2AF926FDBBFB9E.text	038C8799985FFFF7FF2AF926FDBBFB9E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Tectaria griffithii (Baker) C. Christensen 1934	<div><p>Tectaria griffithii (Baker) C. Christensen (1934: 180) .</p><p>Basionym:— Nephrodium griffithii Baker in Hooker &amp; Baker (1867: 300). Type:— MYANMAR. Without locality, without date, Griffith s.n. (holotype K!) .</p><p>= Nephrodium yunnanense Baker (1906: 11); Tectaria yunnanensis (Baker) Ching (1931: 24), syn. nov. Type:— CHINA. Yunnan: Mengtze, Red river mountains, without date, Hancock 193 (holotype K!).</p><p>Note:— Tectaria griffithii has long been confused with T. multicaudata (Clarke 1880: 540) Ching (1931: 20) . Both Ching (1931) and Holttum (1991a, b) considered the two species as conspecific, albeit Ching (1931) took T. multicaudata as the accepted name while Holttum (1991a, b) adopted T. griffithii . In fact, T. griffithii and T. multicaudata are distinct in the venation pattern. The holotype of T. griffithii (Griffith s.n., K) is characterized by having fully anastomosing veins, vein areoles mostly with free veinlets included, and lacking costal or costular areoles (Fig. 1a). The holotype of T. multicaudata (Clarke 18427, K) has partly anastomosing veins that form narrow areoles immediately beside costae or costules, without included free veinlets (or rarely occurring) in areoles (Fig. 1b). Noticeably, the feature of venation was clearly stated in the protologues of T. griffithii and T. multicaudata . Baker described the venation of T. griffithii as having “main veins distinct to the edge, with copious free included veinlets” (Hooker &amp; Baker 1867: 300). For the venation of T. multicaudata, Clarke stated that “I can see little difference in the venation and sori between this and Nephrodium cicutarium var. coadunata ” (Clarke 1880: 540). As we know, N. cicutarium var. coadunata mentioned by Clarke is nowadays T. coadunata (Smith 1842: 184) C. Christensen (1931: 331), which is characterized by veins forming costal and costular areoles lacking free included veinlets (Holttum 1991a). Unfortunately, later authors ignored the easily recognizable difference of venation between the two species. It is notable that the venation in such two conditions (costal areoles present or not) is the sole difference between two sections of Tectaria proposed by Holttum (1988, 1991a). According to Holttum’s subdivision of Tectaria, T. multicaudata should be grouped into sect. Sagenia, whereas T. griffithii to sect. Tectaria .</p><p>Tectaria yunnanensis is included here in T. griffithii . When comparing the holotypes of both species, we found that they are similar in nearly all important characters, such as coarsely dissected fronds, fully anastomosing veins without costal or costular areoles, large sori in two rows between main veins, and sori rather deeply impressed on abaxial surface of lamina. They doubtless represent a single species. It is also noticed that there are no scales above the base of stipes in this species. Scaly stipes, previously considered a diagnostic character of T. griffithii (e.g., Holttum 1988, Tagawa &amp; Iwatsuki 1988, Wang 1999), is actually a characteristic feature of T. multicaudata .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038C8799985FFFF7FF2AF926FDBBFB9E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Ding, Hui-Hui;Chao, Yi-Shan;Dong, Shi-Yong	Ding, Hui-Hui, Chao, Yi-Shan, Dong, Shi-Yong (2013): Taxonomic novelties in the fern genus Tectaria (Tectariaceae). Phytotaxa 122 (1): 61-64, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.122.1.3, URL: https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/1c8cd699-b662-3604-9d74-d21f63ad781c/
038C8799985EFFF7FF2FFBF9FD72FA29.text	038C8799985EFFF7FF2FFBF9FD72FA29.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Tectaria macleanii (Copel.) S. Y. Dong 2013	<div><p>Tectaria macleanii (Copel.) S.Y.Dong, comb. nov.</p><p>Basionym:— Tectaridium macleanii Copeland (1926: 329) . Type:— PHILIPPINES. Luzon: Cagayan ( West Mountain, Claveria), 29 December 1919, Maclean &amp; Catatan 84 (neotype MICH, isoneotype CAS, all original material destroyed in 1945 at PNH) .</p><p>= Tectaridium primitivum Copeland (1926: 329) . Type:— PHILIPPINES. Leyte: Buenavista (Jaro), 9 June 1914, Wenzel 876 (holotype PNH, destroyed, isotypes F, MO, NY, UC).</p><p>Note:— Tectaridium Copeland (1926: 329) is a monotypic genus in the Philippines (Holttum 1991a). In our phylogenetic trees based on six cpDNA sequences (Ding et al., unpubl. data), however, the sample of Tectaridium was well resolved in a monophyletic clade with other Tectaria species. So the transfer of Tectaridium macleanii into Tectaria is needed.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038C8799985EFFF7FF2FFBF9FD72FA29	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Ding, Hui-Hui;Chao, Yi-Shan;Dong, Shi-Yong	Ding, Hui-Hui, Chao, Yi-Shan, Dong, Shi-Yong (2013): Taxonomic novelties in the fern genus Tectaria (Tectariaceae). Phytotaxa 122 (1): 61-64, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.122.1.3, URL: https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/1c8cd699-b662-3604-9d74-d21f63ad781c/
038C8799985EFFF4FF2FFA28FD1DFE5A.text	038C8799985EFFF4FF2FFA28FD1DFE5A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Tectaria multicaudata (C. B. Clarke 1880) Ching 1931	<div><p>Tectaria multicaudata (C.B.Clarke) Ching (1931: 20) .</p><p>Basionym:— Nephrodium multicaudatum Clarke (1880: 540) . Type:— BANGLADESH. Sylhet, 30 November 1887, Clarke 18427 (holotype K!) .</p><p>Ξ Tectaria griffithii auct . non (Baker) Christensen (1934: 180), Holttum (1991a: 54), pro parte, excluding the type of T. griffithii .</p><p>= Tectaria griffithii var. singaporeana Holttum (1991b: 551), syn. nov. Type:— SINGAPORE. Bukit Timah, January 1908, Matthew s.n. (holotype K!).</p><p>Note:—As stated above, Tectaria multicaudata is a separate species from T. griffithii . They are distinct in the venation pattern, i.e., costal and costular areoles are present in T. multicaudata but absent in T. griffithii (Fig. 1).</p><p>Holttum (1991b) proposed two varieties under his misunderstood Tectaria griffithii, i.e., T. griffithii var. singaporeana and T. griffithii var. amplissima, both having costal and costular areoles of veins. The only difference between the two varieties is “veins all free in lobes of fertile pinnae” in “ T. griffithii var. singaporeana ” but “veins amply anastomosing in fertile fronds” in “ T. griffithii var. amplissima ” (Holttum 1991b). When carefully comparing a large number of specimens of T. multicaudata in herbaria, we found the form of veins of “ T. griffithii var. singaporeana ” falling within the variation range of veins of T. multicaudata . Therefore we propose to include T. griffithii var. singaporeana in T. multicaudata . The holotype of the second variety, T. griffithii var. amplissima, however, represents a distinct taxon, which is transferred to T. multicaudata as a variety.</p><p>Tectaria malayensis (Christ 1907: 187) Copeland (1907: 416) was submerged by Holttum (1991a) under his misapplied T. griffithii . It was based on a collection from Luzon (Loher 858, K!) with the same venation pattern of T. multicaudata . If T. malayensis will be eventually proved to be a synonymous name, it should be reduced to T. multicaudata instead of T. griffithii .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038C8799985EFFF4FF2FFA28FD1DFE5A	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Ding, Hui-Hui;Chao, Yi-Shan;Dong, Shi-Yong	Ding, Hui-Hui, Chao, Yi-Shan, Dong, Shi-Yong (2013): Taxonomic novelties in the fern genus Tectaria (Tectariaceae). Phytotaxa 122 (1): 61-64, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.122.1.3, URL: https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/1c8cd699-b662-3604-9d74-d21f63ad781c/
038C8799985DFFF4FF2FFB06FB60FA27.text	038C8799985DFFF4FF2FFB06FB60FA27.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Tectaria multicaudata var. amplissima (Holttum) S. Y. Dong 2013	<div><p>Tectaria multicaudata var. amplissima (Holttum) S.Y.Dong, comb. nov.</p><p>Basionym:— Tectaria griffithii var. amplissima Holttum (1991b: 551) . Type:— INDONESIA. Sumatra: Padang Panjang (Bukit Tilabung), 9 January 1913, Matthew s.n. (holotype K!) .</p><p>Note:—As Holttum (1991a, b) has pointed out, T. multicaudata var. amplissima has rather finely dissected fronds with as many as six pairs of pinnules on the basal pinnae. In contrast, the fronds are not so dissected with only one or rarely two pinnules on basal pinna in T. multicaudata var. multicaudata .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038C8799985DFFF4FF2FFB06FB60FA27	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Ding, Hui-Hui;Chao, Yi-Shan;Dong, Shi-Yong	Ding, Hui-Hui, Chao, Yi-Shan, Dong, Shi-Yong (2013): Taxonomic novelties in the fern genus Tectaria (Tectariaceae). Phytotaxa 122 (1): 61-64, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.122.1.3, URL: https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/1c8cd699-b662-3604-9d74-d21f63ad781c/
038C8799985DFFF5FF2FFA3EFBA0FE86.text	038C8799985DFFF5FF2FFA3EFBA0FE86.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Tectaria psomiocarpa S. Y. Dong 2013	<div><p>Tectaria psomiocarpa S.Y.Dong, nom. nov. for Polybotrya apiifolia J.Sm. ex Kunze (1844: 142) . Psomiocarpa</p><p>apiifolia (J.Sm. ex Kunze) Presl (1851: 161) . Acrostichum apiifolium (J.Sm. ex Kunze) Hooker (1864: 248) .</p><p>Type:— PHILIPPINES. Luzon, 1936–1940, Cuming 26 (holotype MICH!, isotypes E!, MO!, P!) .</p><p>Blocking name:— Tectaria apiifolia (Schkuhr 1809: 198) Copeland (1907: 410) . Type:— JAMAICA. Without locality, Sloane s.n. (holotype? BM!).</p><p>Note:— Psomiocarpa C. Presl (1851: 161) is currently an accepted genus containing only one species, P. apiifolia (Schkuhr) Copeland (1907: 410) (Holttum 1991a) . Our molecular analyses (Ding et al., unpubl. data), however, do not support the monophyly of Psomiocarpa, as P. apiifolia is constantly embedded with Tectaria species in all resulting phylogenetic trees. Thus, in taxonomic treatment P. apiifolia should be transferred into Tectaria . Since an earlier T. apiifolia (Schkuhr) Copeland (1907: 410) exists, which is based on material from Jamaica, we have to propose a new name for P. apiifolia, Tectaria psomiocarpa .</p><p>Tectaria subvariolosa S.Y.Dong, nom. nov. for Tectaria stenosemioides Tardieu &amp; C.Christensen (1938: 88) . Type:— VIETNAM. Quang Tri: Vinh Linh (Liem-Cong), July 1910, Cadière 14 (holotype P!, isotypes BM!, P!). Blocking name:— Tectaria stenosemioides (van Alderwerelt van Rosenburgh 1920: 164) Christensen (1934: 184) .</p><p>Type:— INDONESIA. Sumatra: Sibolangit, 4 June 1917, Lorzing 5161 (holotype BO) .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038C8799985DFFF5FF2FFA3EFBA0FE86	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Ding, Hui-Hui;Chao, Yi-Shan;Dong, Shi-Yong	Ding, Hui-Hui, Chao, Yi-Shan, Dong, Shi-Yong (2013): Taxonomic novelties in the fern genus Tectaria (Tectariaceae). Phytotaxa 122 (1): 61-64, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.122.1.3, URL: https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/1c8cd699-b662-3604-9d74-d21f63ad781c/
