taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
038D1C70FFAEEC4875A8A26B2CE9F85A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/283172/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.283172	FIGURE 2. Comparing holotype Euglossa bazinga sp. n. (left column) to E. ignita Smith, 1874 (right column): A – B: dorsal view of metasoma; C – D: frontal view of face; E – F: ventral view of mesotibia; G – H: metatibia. Figures 2 B, D, F and H from an E. ignita specimen from the Amazon (see Appendix 1).	FIGURE 2. Comparing holotype Euglossa bazinga sp. n. (left column) to E. ignita Smith, 1874 (right column): A – B: dorsal view of metasoma; C – D: frontal view of face; E – F: ventral view of mesotibia; G – H: metatibia. Figures 2 B, D, F and H from an E. ignita specimen from the Amazon (see Appendix 1).	2012-12-31	Nemésio, André;Ferrari, Rafael R.		Zenodo	biologists	Nemésio, André;Ferrari, Rafael R.			
038D1C70FFAEEC4875A8A26B2CE9F85A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/283173/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.283173	FIGURE 3. Comparing Euglossa bazinga sp. n. (left column) to E. ignita Smith, 1874 (right column): A – B: ventral view of metasoma focusing on S 2; C – D: dorsal view of left S 2 pocket (setae were removed); E – F: frontal view of left S 2 pocket (setae were removed) — see Diagnosis for discussion. Figure 3 A from the holotype; Figure 3 C and 3 E from a paratype. Figures 3 B, D and F from an E. ignita specimen from the Amazon (see Appendix 1).	FIGURE 3. Comparing Euglossa bazinga sp. n. (left column) to E. ignita Smith, 1874 (right column): A – B: ventral view of metasoma focusing on S 2; C – D: dorsal view of left S 2 pocket (setae were removed); E – F: frontal view of left S 2 pocket (setae were removed) — see Diagnosis for discussion. Figure 3 A from the holotype; Figure 3 C and 3 E from a paratype. Figures 3 B, D and F from an E. ignita specimen from the Amazon (see Appendix 1).	2012-12-31	Nemésio, André;Ferrari, Rafael R.		Zenodo	biologists	Nemésio, André;Ferrari, Rafael R.			
038D1C70FFA8EC4D75A8A0DE2E12FD06.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/283172/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.283172	FIGURE 2. Comparing holotype Euglossa bazinga sp. n. (left column) to E. ignita Smith, 1874 (right column): A – B: dorsal view of metasoma; C – D: frontal view of face; E – F: ventral view of mesotibia; G – H: metatibia. Figures 2 B, D, F and H from an E. ignita specimen from the Amazon (see Appendix 1).	FIGURE 2. Comparing holotype Euglossa bazinga sp. n. (left column) to E. ignita Smith, 1874 (right column): A – B: dorsal view of metasoma; C – D: frontal view of face; E – F: ventral view of mesotibia; G – H: metatibia. Figures 2 B, D, F and H from an E. ignita specimen from the Amazon (see Appendix 1).	2012-12-31	Nemésio, André;Ferrari, Rafael R.		Zenodo	biologists	Nemésio, André;Ferrari, Rafael R.			
038D1C70FFA8EC4D75A8A0DE2E12FD06.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/283173/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.283173	FIGURE 3. Comparing Euglossa bazinga sp. n. (left column) to E. ignita Smith, 1874 (right column): A – B: ventral view of metasoma focusing on S 2; C – D: dorsal view of left S 2 pocket (setae were removed); E – F: frontal view of left S 2 pocket (setae were removed) — see Diagnosis for discussion. Figure 3 A from the holotype; Figure 3 C and 3 E from a paratype. Figures 3 B, D and F from an E. ignita specimen from the Amazon (see Appendix 1).	FIGURE 3. Comparing Euglossa bazinga sp. n. (left column) to E. ignita Smith, 1874 (right column): A – B: ventral view of metasoma focusing on S 2; C – D: dorsal view of left S 2 pocket (setae were removed); E – F: frontal view of left S 2 pocket (setae were removed) — see Diagnosis for discussion. Figure 3 A from the holotype; Figure 3 C and 3 E from a paratype. Figures 3 B, D and F from an E. ignita specimen from the Amazon (see Appendix 1).	2012-12-31	Nemésio, André;Ferrari, Rafael R.		Zenodo	biologists	Nemésio, André;Ferrari, Rafael R.			
038D1C70FFA8EC4D75A8A0DE2E12FD06.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/283174/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.283174	FIGURE 4. Comparing Euglossa bazinga sp. n. (left column) to E. ignita Smith, 1874 (right column): A – B: seventh sternum; C – D: eighth sternum; E – F: lateral view of genital capsule; D – F: dorsal view of genital capsule.	FIGURE 4. Comparing Euglossa bazinga sp. n. (left column) to E. ignita Smith, 1874 (right column): A – B: seventh sternum; C – D: eighth sternum; E – F: lateral view of genital capsule; D – F: dorsal view of genital capsule.	2012-12-31	Nemésio, André;Ferrari, Rafael R.		Zenodo	biologists	Nemésio, André;Ferrari, Rafael R.			
038D1C70FFA8EC4D75A8A0DE2E12FD06.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/283171/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.283171	FIGURE 1. Map illustrating the localities where Euglossa bazinga sp. n. was recorded. Ligth grey shadows = Cerrado (savannah-like vegetation); dark grey = Atlantic Forest.	FIGURE 1. Map illustrating the localities where Euglossa bazinga sp. n. was recorded. Ligth grey shadows = Cerrado (savannah-like vegetation); dark grey = Atlantic Forest.	2012-12-31	Nemésio, André;Ferrari, Rafael R.		Zenodo	biologists	Nemésio, André;Ferrari, Rafael R.			
