identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
038A8841FFF7FF8B8EE3E649FBFBFDFE.text	038A8841FFF7FF8B8EE3E649FBFBFDFE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Egmundella grimaldii Leloup 1940	<div><p>Egmundella grimaldii Leloup, 1940</p><p>(Figs. 2, 3; Table 1)</p><p>Egmundella grimaldii Leloup, 1940: 7, pl. I fig.3.</p><p>Material examined. Morocco. CCLME 2012-404, stn GR- 50, 30º34′12′′N, 9º46′36′′W, 30 m, 05-VII-2012: a colony without gonothecae.</p><p>MAROC-0411, stn MO39, 34º35′23″N, 6º30′33″W, 582 m, 26-XI-2004: a colony, 16 mm high, without gonothecae.</p><p>MAROC-0411, stn MO51, 34º06′43″– 34º05′59″N, 7º29′42″– 7º31′40″W, 722 m, 30-XI-2004: a colony, 35 mm high, without gonothecae.</p><p>MAROC-0411, stn MO53, 34º02′47″– 34º01′47″N, 8º00′00″– 8º01′44″W, 641–663 m, 30-XI-2004: four colonies, 10–38 mm high, one growing on Sertularella gayi, all without gonothecae.</p><p>Western Sahara. MAROC-0611, stn MO263, 24º35′26″– 24º38′23″N, 16º26′36″– 16º25′36″W, 410 m, 5-XII-2006: five colonies, 5–29 mm high, one growing on a bivalve, one on the ophiuroid Ophiacantha abyssicola; one colony with a gonotheca .</p><p>Description. Colonies erect with rhizocaulomic hydrorhiza, becoming simple distally. Hydrothecae, nematothecae and the singly occurring gonotheca arising perpendicularly to the hydrorhiza. Hydrothecae borne on short, smooth pedicels; deeply campanulate, tapering basally, and there provided with a transverse, thing diaphragm; walls parallel, widening distally; rim well-marked, aperture closed by a conical operculum composed of 13–15 elongate, triangular flaps, not connected between them, and folded either inwards or outwards. Nematothecae given off irregularly among the hydrothecae; globular, borne on moderately-long pedicels, aperture distal, circular.</p><p>Gonotheca short-pedicellate, fan-shaped, strongly flattened “dorso-ventrally”, aperture distal, large, spanning from one side to the other (Fig. 2e, 3); margin irregularly serrated, possibly resulting from rupture of the perisarc at maturity; distal part of the walls with numerous longitudinal ridges (Fig. 3).</p><p>Biology. Egmundella grimaldii has been found growing on a campanulariid hydroid (Leloup 1940).</p><p>In our material, one colony was found growing on Sertularella gayi (Lamouroux, 1821), one on a bivalve shell, and one on an ophiuran. A fertile colony was found in December.</p><p>Distribution. This species was previously found only once, by Leloup (1940), in the Bay of Biscay, between 748 and 1262 m.</p><p>Our material was found off both Morocco and Western Sahara at depths from 30 to 722 m.</p><p>Remarks. This is the first time this species has been found since its original description (Leloup 1940), and our report also represents the first account of its gonotheca. The measurements of our material (see table 1) agree with those provided by Leloup (1940). The large size of the hydrothecae and their short pedicels are specific characters, allowing us to distinguish it from C. producta .</p><p>Egmundella grimaldii resembles in the shape of colonies to those of E.fasciculata Fraser,1942,from Massachusetts, USA. Nevertheless, there are several morphological characters which allow their specific differentiation. The latter is distally ramified, its nematothecae are borne on both the hydrorhiza and hydrothecal pedicels, and the hydrothecal aperture is closed by an operculum composed of 8–10 flaps. None of these features were observed in our material; moreover, the opercula of our hydrothecae are composed of a higher number of flaps.</p><p>Schuchert (2016) noted that the hydroid of E. grimaldii is similar to that of Cyclocanna producta (G.O. Sars, 1874) [as E. producta in his paper], and stressed the need for the study of new material to evaluate whether it is a mere variant of C. producta (see below). Our material shows the same diagnostic characters as those of the holotype, and the presence of a fertile specimen supports its specific validity. Despite the gonothecae of both species being quite similar in shape and size, they nevertheless differ in the presence of transversal and basal undulations in C. producta (Schuchert 2016: 222), versus longitudinal and distal ridges in the present species. In addition, comparison of the present material with colonies of C. producta, collected from the same study area, convinced us that they are distinct species (see below).</p><p>The morphological similarities between the gonothecae of E. grimaldii and C. producta suggest that both species could be congeneric. Nevertheless, and like Schuchert (2016), we considered necessary to study additional fertile material, including molecular studies in order to clarify its taxonomic position.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038A8841FFF7FF8B8EE3E649FBFBFDFE	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Gil, Marta;Ramil, Fran	Gil, Marta, Ramil, Fran (2023): The genera Egmundella Stechow, 1921 and Cyclocanna Bigelow, 1918 (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa) in waters of Northwest Africa. Zootaxa 5264 (4): 490-504, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5264.4.2, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5264.4.2
038A8841FFF0FF888EE3E122FA32FE12.text	038A8841FFF0FF888EE3E122FA32FE12.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Egmundella modesta Millard & Bouillon 1975	<div><p>Egmundella modesta Millard &amp; Bouillon, 1975</p><p>(Fig. 4a; Table 2)</p><p>Lovenella (?)— Millard &amp; Bouillon, 1973: 42–43, fig. 5E–F.</p><p>Egmundella modesta Millard &amp; Bouillon, 1975: 5–7, fig. 1E–H; Vervoort, 2006: 224–225, figs. 7 no. 3; 8 no. 3; 9d–h.</p><p>Material examined. Western Sahara. MAROC-0611, stn MO235, 23º12′00″– 23º14′27″N, 17º11′16″– 17º12′27″W, 909–913 m, 27-XI-2006: a colony, 0.85 mm high, growing on Halecium sp., without gonothecae .</p><p>Description. Colony stolonal, composed of hydrothecae and nematothecae arising from a filiform hydrorhiza. Hydrothecae borne on pedicels of varied length, though most are short, slender, generally smooth, occasionally with 2–5 basal annulations and sometimes a few irregularly-placed, additional annulations along its length, distally widening at junction with the corresponding theca, and there provided with a transverse, thin diaphragm. Hydrotheca deeply campanulate, tapering basally, walls almost parallel, aperture closed by a conical operculum, composed of 8–10 elongate, triangular flaps, independent from one another; flaps may be folded either inwards or outwards and, in this case, the rim is distinctly-marked. Nematothecae irregularly scattered, small, globular, borne on short pedicels, aperture apical, oval. No gonothecae observed.</p><p>Biology. Egmundella modesta has been reported so far growing on an unidentifiable hydroid fragment (Vervoort 2006).</p><p>In our material, it was found growing on a species of Halecium .</p><p>Distribution. This species has previously been found in the Seychelles (Millard &amp; Bouillon 1973, as Lovenella sp.; Millard &amp; Bouillon 1975) and Mauritania (Vervoort 2006). Its bathymetric distribution ranges from the littoral zone (Millard &amp; Bouillon 1975) to 1000 m (Vervoort 2006).</p><p>Our material was found off Western Sahara at depths from 909 to 913 m.</p><p>Remarks. The material agrees in morphology with the holotype described by Millard &amp; Bouillon (1975) from the Seychelles and with the CANCAP material of E. modesta studied by Vervoort (2006). In our material most of hydrothecae have short pedicels. However, some hydrothecae are larger in size, and have longer pedicels (Fig 4a). This feature was also described by Vervoort (2006), but we now provide more extensive measurements (see table 2).</p><p>Largest hydrothecae resemble those of E. grimaldii, but in that species the colonies form rhizocaulomic, stemlike structures, a character not observed in our material, where the hydrorhiza is composed of a single stolon growing on Halecium sp. Moreover, in E. grimaldii the hydrothecal pedicels are shorter and the nematothecae are larger.</p><p>After comparing material of both species collected during the MAROC surveys, we concluded that the present material is clearly different from E. grimaldii, while fitting well the descriptions of E. modesta found in the literature.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038A8841FFF0FF888EE3E122FA32FE12	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Gil, Marta;Ramil, Fran	Gil, Marta, Ramil, Fran (2023): The genera Egmundella Stechow, 1921 and Cyclocanna Bigelow, 1918 (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa) in waters of Northwest Africa. Zootaxa 5264 (4): 490-504, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5264.4.2, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5264.4.2
038A8841FFF3FF868EE3E028FB7BFF1E.text	038A8841FFF3FF868EE3E028FB7BFF1E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Egmundella superba Stechow 1921	<div><p>Egmundella superba Stechow, 1921</p><p>(Fig. 4b; Table 3)</p><p>Egmundella superba Stechow, 1921: 226–227; Stechow, 1923: 126–127, fig. R; Vervoort, 1966: 110, fig. 10; Calder, 1991: 11–12, fig. 4.</p><p>Campanulina producta — Leloup, 1940: 8, pl. I fig. 4.</p><p>Material examined. Morocco. MAROC-0411, stn MO49, 34º12′14″– 34º11′32″N, 7º21′01″– 7º23′02″W, 1013– 1024 m, 29-XI-2004: three colonies, 0.8– 3 mm high, one growing on Acryptolaria conferta minor, two growing on sponges, all without gonothecae .</p><p>MAROC-0611, station data lost: two colonies, 2.4–3.5 mm high, one growing on Lafoea gracillima, and one on fishing line, both without gonothecae.</p><p>Mauritania. MAURIT-1011, stn MU290, 18 º16′53″– 18º18′44″N, 18º18′44″– 16º35′35″W, 311 m, 14-XII-2010: a colony growing on the bivalve Delectopecten vitreus, without gonothecae .</p><p>Description. Colonies stolonal, with hydrothecae and nematothecae arising from filiform hydrorhiza. Hydrothecae borne on long, slender, smooth pedicels widening distally, with 2–3 basal undulations and some irregularly-placed, additional annulations. Hydrotheca long, tubular, narrowing basally at junction with its corresponding pedicel, and there delimited by a transverse, thin diaphragm; rim not apparent, aperture closed by an operculum composed of more than fifteen elongate, triangular flaps. Nematothecae long, slender, widening distally, borne on indistinct pedicels, aperture apical, circular.</p><p>Biology. This species was found growing on the axis of an octocoral by Calder (1991).</p><p>In our material, the colonies were growing on the hydroids Acryptolaria conferta minor (Ramil &amp; Vervoort, 1992) and Lafoea gracillima (Alder, 1856), on sponges, on the bivalve Delectopecten vitreus (Gmelin, 1791), and on a fishing line. Gonothecae were not observed.</p><p>Distribution. Egmundella superba is basically an amphi-Atlantic species, with records from Saint Thomas, West Indies (type locality) (Stechow 1921), the Bermuda (Calder 1991) and the Azores (Leloup 1940, as Campanulina producta); in addition, there is a doubtful record from off Natal, SW Indian Ocean (Millard 1977, as Egmundella ? superba). Its bathymetric distribution ranges from 75 (Calder 1991) to 1250 m (Leloup 1940).</p><p>Our material was collected from Morocco and Mauritania, from depths of 311 to 1024 m.</p><p>Remarks. Our material agrees in both morphology and measurements with specimens of E. superba from the West Atlantic (Calder 1991). Moreover, the distinctive shape and length of the nematothecae, and the long and slender hydrothecae (Fig. 4b), are features that allowed us to identify this material as E. superba .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038A8841FFF3FF868EE3E028FB7BFF1E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Gil, Marta;Ramil, Fran	Gil, Marta, Ramil, Fran (2023): The genera Egmundella Stechow, 1921 and Cyclocanna Bigelow, 1918 (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa) in waters of Northwest Africa. Zootaxa 5264 (4): 490-504, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5264.4.2, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5264.4.2
038A8841FFFDFF848EE3E738FB6FFEA6.text	038A8841FFFDFF848EE3E738FB6FFEA6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Egmundella ansini Gil & Ramil 2023	<div><p>Egmundella ansini n. sp.</p><p>(Fig. 5; Table 4)</p><p>Material examined. Western Sahara. MAROC-0611, stn MO239, 23º28′05″– 23º24′32″N, 17º16′24″– 17º16′22″W, 963–969 m, 28-XI-2006: a colony, 2 mm high, with gonothecae, growing on the stem of an unidentified hydrozoan (Holotype, MNCN 2.03 /687) .</p><p>MAROC-0611, stn MO275, 25º27′17″– 25º29′34″N, 16º22′06″– 16º21′15″W, 1505–1510 m, 9-XII-2006: a colony, 4 mm high, growing on Streptocaulus chonae, one gonotheca present (Paratype, RMNH.COEL.43831) .</p><p>Etymology. The specific name ansini honours our colleague and friend Dr José Ansín-Agís, of the University of Vigo, Spain, in appreciation and recognition of his important contribution to the taxonomy of plumularioid hydroids.</p><p>Description. Colonies stolonal, composed of hydrothecae, nematothecae and gonothecae arising from filiform hydroriza. Hydrothecae borne on pedicels of varied lengths, though mostly long (Fig. 5a, c–g), smooth, slender, with short basal annulations and occasionally a distally placed, additional annulation; distally widening at junction with the corresponding theca, and there provided with a transverse, thin diaphragm. Hydrotheca deeply campanulate, tapering basally, walls parallel, rim not apparent, aperture closed by a conical operculum composed of 15–18 elongate, triangular flaps, not connected between them, and folded either inwards or outwards. Nematothecae borne irregularly on the hydrorhiza between the hydrothecae; long, slender, without distinct pedicel, aperture distal, circular.</p><p>Gonothecae arise perpendicularly to the hydrorhiza, tubular, elongate, tapering basally in small undulations, without distinct pedicel, rim imperceptible, aperture distal, closed by a conical operculum composed of 16 elongate triangular flaps, independent from one another (Fig. 5a, c).</p><p>Biology. In our material, one colony was growing on the hydroid Streptocaulus chonae Ansín Agís, Ramil &amp; Vervoort, 2001 . Gonothecae have been observed in November and December.</p><p>Distribution. Egmundella ansini n. sp. was collected from Western Sahara at depths between 696 and 1510 m.</p><p>Remarks. This species is clearly different from both E. grimaldii and C. producta (see below) on the account of the shape of gonothecae and the appearance of its colonies. It is also different from E. modesta, which has colonies and pedicels much smaller than those of E. ansini n. sp.</p><p>Our material resembles in morphology to E. superba, E. magellanica Galea et al., 2019 and the material from the “Galathea” Expedition described by Vervoort (1966) as Egmundella sp. Nevertheless, there are considerable differences in size allowing them to be confidently separated specifically.</p><p>In E. ansini n. sp. the hydrothecae and pedicels are larger than those of the specimens of E. superba studied herein, and also larger than those described by Calder (1991).</p><p>Conversely, E. ansini n. sp. has smaller and narrower gonothecae than those of E. magellanica . Also, its hydrothecae are larger and their pedicels slenderer and lacking the twists of E. magellanica (see table 4).</p><p>Finally, Egmundella sp. from the “Galathea” Expedition (Vervoort 1966) has been only reported from Indonesia, and it seems unlikely that it could be conspecific, given its distribution. In addition, its hydrothecal pedicels have a “few distinct rings” basally (Vervoort 1966: fig. 9a), while in our material there are only some scarcely-defined annulations (Fig. 5a). Moreover, in our material the hydrothecal pedicels are shorter, while the hydrothecae and nematothecae are larger than those of the “Galathea” Expedition (Vervoort, 1966) (see table 4).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038A8841FFFDFF848EE3E738FB6FFEA6	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Gil, Marta;Ramil, Fran	Gil, Marta, Ramil, Fran (2023): The genera Egmundella Stechow, 1921 and Cyclocanna Bigelow, 1918 (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa) in waters of Northwest Africa. Zootaxa 5264 (4): 490-504, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5264.4.2, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5264.4.2
038A8841FFFFFF828EE3E0B5FA97F97B.text	038A8841FFFFFF828EE3E0B5FA97F97B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cyclocanna producta (G. O. Sars 1874)	<div><p>Cyclocanna producta (G.O. Sars, 1874)</p><p>(Fig. 6; Table 5)</p><p>Cyclocanna producta — Schuchert et al., 2017: 177, fig. 7.</p><p>Lovenella producta — Fraser, 1944: 175, pl. XXXI fig. 149; Cornelius, 1995: 166–168, fig. 37; Schuchert, 2001: 54, fig. 39; Calder, 2012: 22–23, fig. 21.</p><p>Egmundella producta — Schuchert, 2016: 219–224, figs 1A–D, 2A–C, 3A–F.</p><p>Material examined. Morocco. MAROC-0411, stn MO31, 34º28′56″– 34º27′33″N, 7º12′22″– 7º11′02″W, 1722– 1824 m, 24-XI-2004: a colony, 4 mm high, growing on Halecium delicatulum, without gonothecae .</p><p>MAROC-0411, stn MO56, 33º32′05″– 33º31′60″N, 8º26′43″– 8º28′34″W, 1556–1620 m, 02-XI-2004: two colonies, 1–5 mm high, one growing on Halecium delicatulum, the other on Stegolaria geniculata; both without gonothecae.</p><p>Western Sahara. MAROC-0611, stn MO189, 21º09′04″– 21º12′24″N, 17º42′06″– 17º42′18″W, 556–564 m, 14- XI-2004: a colony, 1.9 mm high, growing on an unidentified hydrozoan, without gonothecae .</p><p>MAROC-0611, stn MO235, 23º12′00″– 23º14′27″N, 17º11′16″– 17º12′27″W, 909–913 m, 27-XI-2006: a colony, 0.6 mm high, growing on Halecium sp, without gonothecae.</p><p>MAROC-0611, stn MO260, 24º31′21″– 24º33′03″N, 16º51′04″– 16º48′12″W, 1429–1440 m, 05-XII-2006: a colony, 4 mm high, growing on Lafoea gracillima, without gonothecae.</p><p>Mauritania. MAURIT-0811, stn MU89, 20 º20′50″– 20º18′23″N, 17º53′30″– 17º52′03″W, 1012– 1000 m, 20-XI-2008: three colonies up to 4 mm high, one growing on Eudendrium ramosum, another on an unidentified hydrozoan, and the last one on a plastic net; all with gonothecae .</p><p>MAURIT-0911, stn MU195, 20 º24′31″– 20º26′10″N, 18º03′31″– 18º06′10″W, 1236– 1214 m, 23-XI-2009: two colonies growing on bivalves, without gonothecae .</p><p>Guinea Bissau. CCLME 2011-410, stn GR- 04, 10º26′47′′N, 17º22′43′′W, 504 m, 28-X-2011: a colony growing on a worm tube, without gonothecae.</p><p>Description. Colonies stolonal, with hydrothecae, nematothecae and gonothecae arising irregularly from filiform hydrorhiza. Hydrothecae borne on long, smooth pedicels, with some short basal undulations and some others irregularly-placed along its length. Hydrotheca deeply campanulate, elongated, tapering basally where it is provided with a transverse, thin diaphragm; walls parallel, widening distally, rim not apparent, aperture closed by a conical operculum composed of 10–12 triangular flaps that can be folded either inwards or outwards, and in this case, the rim is distinctly-marked. Nematothecae arising between the hydrothecae, egg-shaped, borne on short pedicels, aperture apical, circular.</p><p>Gonothecae fan-shaped, strongly flattened “dorso-ventrally”, borne on short, slightly undulated pedicels, aperture distal, large, spanning from one side to the other.</p><p>Biology. This species has been found growing on various hydroids, notably Tubularia indivisa Linnaeus, 1758 (Calder 2012), dead Lophelia corals (Cornelius 1995), polychaete tubes and ascidians (Schuchert 2016). Gonothecae have been found in April (Schuchert 2016) and November (Gil &amp; Ramil 2017).</p><p>In our material, colonies were growing on the hydroids Lafoea gracillima, Eudendrium ramosum (Linnaeus, 1758) and Halecium sp., as well as on bivalves, a worm tube and a plastic net. One colony with gonothecae was found in November.</p><p>Distribution. This species has a North-Atlantic distribution, from the Lofoten Islands to Øresund and southwest Ireland in the East, and from northern Canada to Cape Cod in the West (Calder 2012). Fraser’s (1944) record from the Pacific coast of North America was considered doubtful by Schuchert (2016). We also agree with him regarding the exclusion of the material from the Bay of Biscay reported by Vervoort (1985), due to its gonothecae being very different from the flattened ones described in C. producta by Schuchert (2016, as E. producta) and those reported upon by Gil &amp; Ramil (2017) from Mauritanian material. Its previously-known bathymetric distribution ranges from 6 to 750 m (Schuchert 2016).</p><p>Our material was collected from Morocco to Guinea Bissau at depths of 504 to 1440 m.</p><p>Remarks. DNA barcoding of Cyclocanna welshi Bigelow, 1918 and Egmundella producta (Sars G.O. 1874), prompted Schuchert et al. (2017) to conclude that the first nominal species is the medusa of the second. Because the distributions of the polyp and medusa, restricted to the cool waters of the North Atlantic, matched, the authors synonymised both names under the new combination, Cyclocanna producta (G.O. Sars, 1874) . Our records of typical colonies of ‘ E. producta ’ from deep waters of West Africa expand its southern limit of distribution from Southwest Ireland (Calder 2012) to Guinea-Bissau.</p><p>The presence of gonothecae in the material collected from Mauritania and the morphology of the trophosome, with long hydrothecal pedicels and stolonal nematothecae, allowed us to identify this material as C. producta (see also Gil 2017).</p><p>MAURIT-0811</p><p>St. 10 (MU89) Pedicel, length from base to ‘diaphragm’ 1925–10000 diameter of pedicel 102–235 Hydrotheca, length ‘diaphragm’-rim, excluding. operculum 551–918</p><p>idem, including operculum 673–1102</p><p>diameter at rim 205–530</p><p>diameter at ‘diaphragm’ 143–230 Nematotheca, length including pedicel 56–72</p><p>maximal diameter 36–46 Gonotheca, length including pedicel 1150–2725 maximum width 938–2850</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038A8841FFFFFF828EE3E0B5FA97F97B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Gil, Marta;Ramil, Fran	Gil, Marta, Ramil, Fran (2023): The genera Egmundella Stechow, 1921 and Cyclocanna Bigelow, 1918 (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa) in waters of Northwest Africa. Zootaxa 5264 (4): 490-504, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5264.4.2, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5264.4.2
