taxonID	type	description	language	source
038AE0224C47FFB1FF10FA24FA83F9C2.taxon	description	Notes: — The lectotype chosen preserves current usage, and matches the sectional description in the protologue.	en	Whittemore, Alan T. (2017): Typification of infrageneric names in Ulmus L. (Ulmaceae). Phytotaxa 297 (3): 291-294, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.297.3.11, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.297.3.11
038AE0224C47FFB1FF10F9B4FC03F886.taxon	description	Ulmus section Chaetoptelea (Liebm.) C. K. Schneid., Oesterr. Bot. Z. 66: 25, 27. 1916 ≡ Chaetoptelea Liebm., Vidensk. Meddel. Dansk Naturhist. Foren. Kjøbenhavn 1850: 76 – 77. 1850	en	Whittemore, Alan T. (2017): Typification of infrageneric names in Ulmus L. (Ulmaceae). Phytotaxa 297 (3): 291-294, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.297.3.11, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.297.3.11
038AE0224C47FFB1FF10F9B4FC03F886.taxon	materials_examined	Holotype: — Chaetoptelea mexicana Liebm. (= Ulmus mexicana (Liebm.) Planch.) Notes: — Chaetoptelea mexicana is the only species cited in the protologue.	en	Whittemore, Alan T. (2017): Typification of infrageneric names in Ulmus L. (Ulmaceae). Phytotaxa 297 (3): 291-294, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.297.3.11, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.297.3.11
038AE0224C47FFB0FF10F8F0FE0FFEE7.taxon	materials_examined	Holotype: — Ulmus crassifolia Nutt. Notes: — Schneider (1917) attributed the name to Schneider (1916), but the name does not appear there. Ulmus crassifolia is the only species cited in the protologue. Ulmus section Dryoptelea Spach, Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot. sér. 2. 15: 361. 1841, nom. illeg. ≡ Ulmus subgenus Dryoptelea (Spach) Planch., Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot. sér. 3. 10: 260. 1848, nom. illeg. Notes: — This name is superfluous since the protologue of this section included the generitype, Ulmus campestris, in synonymy (Art. 52.1 of the ICN).	en	Whittemore, Alan T. (2017): Typification of infrageneric names in Ulmus L. (Ulmaceae). Phytotaxa 297 (3): 291-294, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.297.3.11, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.297.3.11
038AE0224C46FFB0FF10FED2FEDFFE3F.taxon	materials_examined	Holotype: — Ulmus glabra Huds. Notes: — This name is automatically typified under Art. 22.6 of the ICN. Despite its archaic form, this name is legitimate under Art. 21.3 of the ICN, since it was not formed by adding the prefix “ Eu- “ to the name of a genus but to the name of an included species.	en	Whittemore, Alan T. (2017): Typification of infrageneric names in Ulmus L. (Ulmaceae). Phytotaxa 297 (3): 291-294, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.297.3.11, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.297.3.11
038AE0224C46FFB0FF10FCCAFC9BFBA3.taxon	materials_examined	Holotype: — Ulmus fulva Michx. (= U. rubra Muhl.) Notes: — This name is automatically typified under Art. 22.6 of the ICN. Ulmus series Glabrae Moss, Cambr. Brit. Fl. 2: 89, 95. 1914 ≡ Ulmus subsection Glabrae (Moss) C. K. Schneid., Oesterr. Bot. Z. 66: 29. 1916 Holotype: — Ulmus glabra Huds. Notes: — Ulmus glabra is the only species cited in the protologue.	en	Whittemore, Alan T. (2017): Typification of infrageneric names in Ulmus L. (Ulmaceae). Phytotaxa 297 (3): 291-294, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.297.3.11, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.297.3.11
038AE0224C46FFB0FF10FB16FC5EFB33.taxon	materials_examined	Holotype: — Ulmus lanceifolia Roxb. Notes: — Ulmus lanceifolia was the only species cited in the protologue.	en	Whittemore, Alan T. (2017): Typification of infrageneric names in Ulmus L. (Ulmaceae). Phytotaxa 297 (3): 291-294, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.297.3.11, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.297.3.11
038AE0224C46FFB0FF10FA0AFC39F963.taxon	materials_examined	Holotype: — Ulmus mexicana (Liebm.) Planch. Notes: — Ulmus mexicana was designated as the type in the protologue. Ulmus subgenus Microptelea (Spach) Planch., Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot. sér. 3. 10: 260. 1848 ≡ Microptelea Spach, Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot. sér. 2. 15: 358. 1841 ≡ Ulmus section Microptelea (Spach) Benth. & Hook. f., Gen. Pl. 3: 352. 1880 Holotype: — Microptelea parvifolia (Jacq.) Spach (= Ulmus parvifolia Jacq.). Notes: — Microptelea parvifolia is the only species cited in the protologue.	en	Whittemore, Alan T. (2017): Typification of infrageneric names in Ulmus L. (Ulmaceae). Phytotaxa 297 (3): 291-294, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.297.3.11, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.297.3.11
038AE0224C46FFB0FF10F956FC21F8F3.taxon	materials_examined	Holotype: — Ulmus nitens Moench (= U. minor Mill.). Notes: — This name is automatically typified under Art. 22.6 of the ICN.	en	Whittemore, Alan T. (2017): Typification of infrageneric names in Ulmus L. (Ulmaceae). Phytotaxa 297 (3): 291-294, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.297.3.11, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.297.3.11
038AE0224C46FFB0FF10FDAAFC21FCDF.taxon	description	Ulmus subsection Foliaceae C. K. Schneid., Oesterr. Bot. Z. 66: 26, 31. 1916 ≡ Ulmus section Foliaceae (C. K. Schneid.) Grudz., Fl. Vostochnoi Evropy 11: 34. 2004	en	Whittemore, Alan T. (2017): Typification of infrageneric names in Ulmus L. (Ulmaceae). Phytotaxa 297 (3): 291-294, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.297.3.11, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.297.3.11
038AE0224C46FFB0FF10FDAAFC21FCDF.taxon	materials_examined	Holotype: — Ulmus foliacea Gilib. (= U. minor Mill.) Notes: — This name is automatically typified under Art. 22.6 of the ICN.	en	Whittemore, Alan T. (2017): Typification of infrageneric names in Ulmus L. (Ulmaceae). Phytotaxa 297 (3): 291-294, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.297.3.11, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.297.3.11
038AE0224C46FFB0FF10F8E6FA81F7CB.taxon	description	Notes: — The lectotype chosen preserves current usage, and shows the characters attributed to the section in the protologue. The name Ulmus section Oreoptelea Spach, Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot. sér. 2 15: 363. 1841 nom. illegit., is superfluous since protologue of this section included the type of Ulmus section Blepharocarpus Dumort. (Art. 52.1 of the ICN).	en	Whittemore, Alan T. (2017): Typification of infrageneric names in Ulmus L. (Ulmaceae). Phytotaxa 297 (3): 291-294, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.297.3.11, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.297.3.11
038AE0224C45FFB3FF10FE46FC32FDE3.taxon	materials_examined	Holotype: — Ulmus glaucescens Franch. Notes: — Ulmus glaucescens was designated as the type in the protologue.	en	Whittemore, Alan T. (2017): Typification of infrageneric names in Ulmus L. (Ulmaceae). Phytotaxa 297 (3): 291-294, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.297.3.11, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.297.3.11
038AE0224C45FFB3FF10FDD6FC4EFD72.taxon	materials_examined	Holotype: — Ulmus serotina Sarg. Notes: — Ulmus serotina is the only species cited in the protologue.	en	Whittemore, Alan T. (2017): Typification of infrageneric names in Ulmus L. (Ulmaceae). Phytotaxa 297 (3): 291-294, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.297.3.11, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.297.3.11
038AE0224C45FFB3FF10FF26FC33FEC3.taxon	materials_examined	Holotype: — Ulmus pumila L. Notes: — This section is automatically typified under Art. 22.6 of the ICN.	en	Whittemore, Alan T. (2017): Typification of infrageneric names in Ulmus L. (Ulmaceae). Phytotaxa 297 (3): 291-294, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.297.3.11, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.297.3.11
038AE0224C45FFB3FF10FEB6FC4DFE53.taxon	materials_examined	Holotype: — Ulmus thomasii Sarg. Notes: — Ulmus thomasii was designated as the type in the protologue.	en	Whittemore, Alan T. (2017): Typification of infrageneric names in Ulmus L. (Ulmaceae). Phytotaxa 297 (3): 291-294, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.297.3.11, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.297.3.11
038AE0224C45FFB3FF10FBA2FC21FB47.taxon	materials_examined	Holotype: — Ulmus wallichiana Planch. Notes: — This name is automatically typified under Art. 22.6 of the ICN.	en	Whittemore, Alan T. (2017): Typification of infrageneric names in Ulmus L. (Ulmaceae). Phytotaxa 297 (3): 291-294, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.297.3.11, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.297.3.11
