taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
038B2C37FF9AFFC8FF729DBBFDED1D79.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/280839/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.280839	FIGURE 3. Chironomus (Chironomus) spp, pupa. A, D: frontal apotome. B, E, G: tergites. C, F, H: anal spur. A – C: Chironomus (Chironomus) entis Shobanov. D – F: Chironomus (C.) bifurcatus Wülker, Martin, Kiknadze, Sublette et Michiels. G, H: Chironomus sp.	FIGURE 3. Chironomus (Chironomus) spp, pupa. A, D: frontal apotome. B, E, G: tergites. C, F, H: anal spur. A – C: Chironomus (Chironomus) entis Shobanov. D – F: Chironomus (C.) bifurcatus Wülker, Martin, Kiknadze, Sublette et Michiels. G, H: Chironomus sp.	2012-12-31	Saether, Ole A.		Zenodo	biologists	Saether, Ole A.			
038B2C37FF9AFFC8FF729DBBFDED1D79.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/280845/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.280845	FIGURE 9. Head capsule lengths of different instars of Chironomus (Chironomus) entis Shobanov and Chironomus bifurcatus Wülker, Martin, Kiknadze, Sublette et Michiels in Lake Winnipeg.	FIGURE 9. Head capsule lengths of different instars of Chironomus (Chironomus) entis Shobanov and Chironomus bifurcatus Wülker, Martin, Kiknadze, Sublette et Michiels in Lake Winnipeg.	2012-12-31	Saether, Ole A.		Zenodo	biologists	Saether, Ole A.			
038B2C37FF9AFFC8FF729DBBFDED1D79.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/280837/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.280837	FIGURE 1. Distribution of Chironomus spp. in the benthic samples of Lake Winnipeg.	FIGURE 1. Distribution of Chironomus spp. in the benthic samples of Lake Winnipeg.	2012-12-31	Saether, Ole A.		Zenodo	biologists	Saether, Ole A.			
038B2C37FF9AFFC8FF729DBBFDED1D79.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/280841/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.280841	FIGURE 5. Chironomus (Chironomus) bifurcatus Wülker, Martin, Kiknadze, Sublette et Michiels. Numbers of adults caught in light traps and emergence traps in 1969 and 1971, and numbers of immatures in benthic samples from June to November 1969 and in March 1970. (LT = light traps, ET = emergence traps, short vertical lines = 1 – 25 specimens, second shortest lines = 26 – 50 specimens, medium long lines = 50 – 200 specimens; second longest vertical lines = 201 – 400 specimens, longest vertical lines = more than 400 specimens, 1 = first instar larvae, 2 = second instar larvae, 3 = third instar larvae, 4 = fourth instar larvae, P = pupae.)	FIGURE 5. Chironomus (Chironomus) bifurcatus Wülker, Martin, Kiknadze, Sublette et Michiels. Numbers of adults caught in light traps and emergence traps in 1969 and 1971, and numbers of immatures in benthic samples from June to November 1969 and in March 1970. (LT = light traps, ET = emergence traps, short vertical lines = 1 – 25 specimens, second shortest lines = 26 – 50 specimens, medium long lines = 50 – 200 specimens; second longest vertical lines = 201 – 400 specimens, longest vertical lines = more than 400 specimens, 1 = first instar larvae, 2 = second instar larvae, 3 = third instar larvae, 4 = fourth instar larvae, P = pupae.)	2012-12-31	Saether, Ole A.		Zenodo	biologists	Saether, Ole A.			
038B2C37FF99FFC7FF72984DFEFD1C8E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/280838/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.280838	FIGURE 2. Chironomus spp., hypopygium A: C. dilutus Shobanov, Kiknadze et Butler. B: C. pallidivittatus Malloch sensu Edwards. C – D: Probable hybrids.	FIGURE 2. Chironomus spp., hypopygium A: C. dilutus Shobanov, Kiknadze et Butler. B: C. pallidivittatus Malloch sensu Edwards. C – D: Probable hybrids.	2012-12-31	Saether, Ole A.		Zenodo	biologists	Saether, Ole A.			
038B2C37FF96FFC6FF729938FB4B18DC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/280839/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.280839	FIGURE 3. Chironomus (Chironomus) spp, pupa. A, D: frontal apotome. B, E, G: tergites. C, F, H: anal spur. A – C: Chironomus (Chironomus) entis Shobanov. D – F: Chironomus (C.) bifurcatus Wülker, Martin, Kiknadze, Sublette et Michiels. G, H: Chironomus sp.	FIGURE 3. Chironomus (Chironomus) spp, pupa. A, D: frontal apotome. B, E, G: tergites. C, F, H: anal spur. A – C: Chironomus (Chironomus) entis Shobanov. D – F: Chironomus (C.) bifurcatus Wülker, Martin, Kiknadze, Sublette et Michiels. G, H: Chironomus sp.	2012-12-31	Saether, Ole A.		Zenodo	biologists	Saether, Ole A.			
038B2C37FF96FFC6FF729938FB4B18DC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/280845/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.280845	FIGURE 9. Head capsule lengths of different instars of Chironomus (Chironomus) entis Shobanov and Chironomus bifurcatus Wülker, Martin, Kiknadze, Sublette et Michiels in Lake Winnipeg.	FIGURE 9. Head capsule lengths of different instars of Chironomus (Chironomus) entis Shobanov and Chironomus bifurcatus Wülker, Martin, Kiknadze, Sublette et Michiels in Lake Winnipeg.	2012-12-31	Saether, Ole A.		Zenodo	biologists	Saether, Ole A.			
038B2C37FF96FFC6FF729938FB4B18DC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/280837/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.280837	FIGURE 1. Distribution of Chironomus spp. in the benthic samples of Lake Winnipeg.	FIGURE 1. Distribution of Chironomus spp. in the benthic samples of Lake Winnipeg.	2012-12-31	Saether, Ole A.		Zenodo	biologists	Saether, Ole A.			
038B2C37FF96FFC6FF729938FB4B18DC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/280843/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.280843	FIGURE 7. Chironomus (Chironomus) entis Shobanov. Numbers of adults caught in light traps and emergence traps in 1969 and 1971, and numbers of immatures in benthic samples from June to November 1969 and in March 1970. (LT = light traps, ET = emergence traps, short vertical lines = 1 – 25 specimens, second shortest lines = 26 – 50 specimens, medium long lines = 50 – 200 specimens; second longest vertical lines = 201 – 400 specimens, longest vertical lines = more than 400 specimens, 1 = first instar larvae, 2 = second instar larvae, 3 = third instar larvae, 4 = fourth instar larvae, P = pupae.)	FIGURE 7. Chironomus (Chironomus) entis Shobanov. Numbers of adults caught in light traps and emergence traps in 1969 and 1971, and numbers of immatures in benthic samples from June to November 1969 and in March 1970. (LT = light traps, ET = emergence traps, short vertical lines = 1 – 25 specimens, second shortest lines = 26 – 50 specimens, medium long lines = 50 – 200 specimens; second longest vertical lines = 201 – 400 specimens, longest vertical lines = more than 400 specimens, 1 = first instar larvae, 2 = second instar larvae, 3 = third instar larvae, 4 = fourth instar larvae, P = pupae.)	2012-12-31	Saether, Ole A.		Zenodo	biologists	Saether, Ole A.			
038B2C37FF96FFC6FF729938FB4B18DC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/280841/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.280841	FIGURE 5. Chironomus (Chironomus) bifurcatus Wülker, Martin, Kiknadze, Sublette et Michiels. Numbers of adults caught in light traps and emergence traps in 1969 and 1971, and numbers of immatures in benthic samples from June to November 1969 and in March 1970. (LT = light traps, ET = emergence traps, short vertical lines = 1 – 25 specimens, second shortest lines = 26 – 50 specimens, medium long lines = 50 – 200 specimens; second longest vertical lines = 201 – 400 specimens, longest vertical lines = more than 400 specimens, 1 = first instar larvae, 2 = second instar larvae, 3 = third instar larvae, 4 = fourth instar larvae, P = pupae.)	FIGURE 5. Chironomus (Chironomus) bifurcatus Wülker, Martin, Kiknadze, Sublette et Michiels. Numbers of adults caught in light traps and emergence traps in 1969 and 1971, and numbers of immatures in benthic samples from June to November 1969 and in March 1970. (LT = light traps, ET = emergence traps, short vertical lines = 1 – 25 specimens, second shortest lines = 26 – 50 specimens, medium long lines = 50 – 200 specimens; second longest vertical lines = 201 – 400 specimens, longest vertical lines = more than 400 specimens, 1 = first instar larvae, 2 = second instar larvae, 3 = third instar larvae, 4 = fourth instar larvae, P = pupae.)	2012-12-31	Saether, Ole A.		Zenodo	biologists	Saether, Ole A.			
038B2C37FF95FFC4FF729C0BFE721AD1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/280838/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.280838	FIGURE 2. Chironomus spp., hypopygium A: C. dilutus Shobanov, Kiknadze et Butler. B: C. pallidivittatus Malloch sensu Edwards. C – D: Probable hybrids.	FIGURE 2. Chironomus spp., hypopygium A: C. dilutus Shobanov, Kiknadze et Butler. B: C. pallidivittatus Malloch sensu Edwards. C – D: Probable hybrids.	2012-12-31	Saether, Ole A.		Zenodo	biologists	Saether, Ole A.			
038B2C37FF92FFC3FF7299C5FC4D192C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/280840/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.280840	FIGURE 4. Chironomus (Chironomus) spp, larva. A, E: labrum and epipharyngeal area. B, F: apex of mandible. C, G: mentum. D, H: posterior end. A – D: Chironomus (C.) bifurcatus Wülker, Martin, Kiknadze, Sublette et Michiels. E – H: Chironomus fluviatilis type.	FIGURE 4. Chironomus (Chironomus) spp, larva. A, E: labrum and epipharyngeal area. B, F: apex of mandible. C, G: mentum. D, H: posterior end. A – D: Chironomus (C.) bifurcatus Wülker, Martin, Kiknadze, Sublette et Michiels. E – H: Chironomus fluviatilis type.	2012-12-31	Saether, Ole A.		Zenodo	biologists	Saether, Ole A.			
038B2C37FF92FFC3FF729EE6FC3D1BD1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/280842/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.280842	FIGURE 6. Chironomus spp., larva. A, F: labrum and epipharyngeal area. B, G: apex of mandible. C, H: mentum. D, E, I: posterior end. A – E: Chironomus (Chironomus) entis Shobanov. F – I: Chironomus (C.) plumosus type.	FIGURE 6. Chironomus spp., larva. A, F: labrum and epipharyngeal area. B, G: apex of mandible. C, H: mentum. D, E, I: posterior end. A – E: Chironomus (Chironomus) entis Shobanov. F – I: Chironomus (C.) plumosus type.	2012-12-31	Saether, Ole A.		Zenodo	biologists	Saether, Ole A.			
038B2C37FF93FFC2FF729C9AFBA618A1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/280844/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.280844	FIGURE 8. Hypopygium. A, B: Benthalia brunneipennis (Johannsen). C: Chironomus (Lobochironomus) sp.	FIGURE 8. Hypopygium. A, B: Benthalia brunneipennis (Johannsen). C: Chironomus (Lobochironomus) sp.	2012-12-31	Saether, Ole A.		Zenodo	biologists	Saether, Ole A.			
038B2C37FF93FFC2FF729DBBFF731E26.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/280839/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.280839	FIGURE 3. Chironomus (Chironomus) spp, pupa. A, D: frontal apotome. B, E, G: tergites. C, F, H: anal spur. A – C: Chironomus (Chironomus) entis Shobanov. D – F: Chironomus (C.) bifurcatus Wülker, Martin, Kiknadze, Sublette et Michiels. G, H: Chironomus sp.	FIGURE 3. Chironomus (Chironomus) spp, pupa. A, D: frontal apotome. B, E, G: tergites. C, F, H: anal spur. A – C: Chironomus (Chironomus) entis Shobanov. D – F: Chironomus (C.) bifurcatus Wülker, Martin, Kiknadze, Sublette et Michiels. G, H: Chironomus sp.	2012-12-31	Saether, Ole A.		Zenodo	biologists	Saether, Ole A.			
038B2C37FF90FFC0FF72992FFB331D32.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/280844/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.280844	FIGURE 8. Hypopygium. A, B: Benthalia brunneipennis (Johannsen). C: Chironomus (Lobochironomus) sp.	FIGURE 8. Hypopygium. A, B: Benthalia brunneipennis (Johannsen). C: Chironomus (Lobochironomus) sp.	2012-12-31	Saether, Ole A.		Zenodo	biologists	Saether, Ole A.			
038B2C37FF91FFDFFF729997FA311E40.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/280844/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.280844	FIGURE 8. Hypopygium. A, B: Benthalia brunneipennis (Johannsen). C: Chironomus (Lobochironomus) sp.	FIGURE 8. Hypopygium. A, B: Benthalia brunneipennis (Johannsen). C: Chironomus (Lobochironomus) sp.	2012-12-31	Saether, Ole A.		Zenodo	biologists	Saether, Ole A.			
038B2C37FF8EFFDFFF729C79FBDA1B45.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/280837/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.280837	FIGURE 1. Distribution of Chironomus spp. in the benthic samples of Lake Winnipeg.	FIGURE 1. Distribution of Chironomus spp. in the benthic samples of Lake Winnipeg.	2012-12-31	Saether, Ole A.		Zenodo	biologists	Saether, Ole A.			
038B2C37FF8EFFDFFF729C79FBDA1B45.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/280841/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.280841	FIGURE 5. Chironomus (Chironomus) bifurcatus Wülker, Martin, Kiknadze, Sublette et Michiels. Numbers of adults caught in light traps and emergence traps in 1969 and 1971, and numbers of immatures in benthic samples from June to November 1969 and in March 1970. (LT = light traps, ET = emergence traps, short vertical lines = 1 – 25 specimens, second shortest lines = 26 – 50 specimens, medium long lines = 50 – 200 specimens; second longest vertical lines = 201 – 400 specimens, longest vertical lines = more than 400 specimens, 1 = first instar larvae, 2 = second instar larvae, 3 = third instar larvae, 4 = fourth instar larvae, P = pupae.)	FIGURE 5. Chironomus (Chironomus) bifurcatus Wülker, Martin, Kiknadze, Sublette et Michiels. Numbers of adults caught in light traps and emergence traps in 1969 and 1971, and numbers of immatures in benthic samples from June to November 1969 and in March 1970. (LT = light traps, ET = emergence traps, short vertical lines = 1 – 25 specimens, second shortest lines = 26 – 50 specimens, medium long lines = 50 – 200 specimens; second longest vertical lines = 201 – 400 specimens, longest vertical lines = more than 400 specimens, 1 = first instar larvae, 2 = second instar larvae, 3 = third instar larvae, 4 = fourth instar larvae, P = pupae.)	2012-12-31	Saether, Ole A.		Zenodo	biologists	Saether, Ole A.			
038B2C37FF8EFFDFFF729C79FBDA1B45.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/280843/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.280843	FIGURE 7. Chironomus (Chironomus) entis Shobanov. Numbers of adults caught in light traps and emergence traps in 1969 and 1971, and numbers of immatures in benthic samples from June to November 1969 and in March 1970. (LT = light traps, ET = emergence traps, short vertical lines = 1 – 25 specimens, second shortest lines = 26 – 50 specimens, medium long lines = 50 – 200 specimens; second longest vertical lines = 201 – 400 specimens, longest vertical lines = more than 400 specimens, 1 = first instar larvae, 2 = second instar larvae, 3 = third instar larvae, 4 = fourth instar larvae, P = pupae.)	FIGURE 7. Chironomus (Chironomus) entis Shobanov. Numbers of adults caught in light traps and emergence traps in 1969 and 1971, and numbers of immatures in benthic samples from June to November 1969 and in March 1970. (LT = light traps, ET = emergence traps, short vertical lines = 1 – 25 specimens, second shortest lines = 26 – 50 specimens, medium long lines = 50 – 200 specimens; second longest vertical lines = 201 – 400 specimens, longest vertical lines = more than 400 specimens, 1 = first instar larvae, 2 = second instar larvae, 3 = third instar larvae, 4 = fourth instar larvae, P = pupae.)	2012-12-31	Saether, Ole A.		Zenodo	biologists	Saether, Ole A.			
038B2C37FF8EFFDFFF729C79FBDA1B45.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/280845/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.280845	FIGURE 9. Head capsule lengths of different instars of Chironomus (Chironomus) entis Shobanov and Chironomus bifurcatus Wülker, Martin, Kiknadze, Sublette et Michiels in Lake Winnipeg.	FIGURE 9. Head capsule lengths of different instars of Chironomus (Chironomus) entis Shobanov and Chironomus bifurcatus Wülker, Martin, Kiknadze, Sublette et Michiels in Lake Winnipeg.	2012-12-31	Saether, Ole A.		Zenodo	biologists	Saether, Ole A.			
