taxonID	type	description	language	source
03908794B261FFAA2AFF25FBDED6FE06.taxon	materials_examined	Type locality. Chile, Región de Coquimbo, Provincia de Limarí, Parque Nacional Fray Jorge.	en	Krolow, Tiago Kütter, Henriques, Augusto Loureiro, González, Christian R. (2016): Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical genus Caenopangonia Kröber, 1930 (Diptera: Tabanidae). Zootaxa 4154 (5): 541-558, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4154.5.3
03908794B261FFAA2AFF25FBDED6FE06.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis Ƌ. Small (9 – 10 mm); head and thorax dark gray to dark brown; abdomen with broad yellow lateral margins, centrally a broad black stripe covered with continuous pale triangles with wide bases (Fig. 2 A – B). Frons, subcallus, parafacial, face, gena and occiput dark gray (Fig. 2 C – D); frons divergent above, with long black hairs (Fig. 2 D); face moderately produced, clearly longer than insertion of antenna; beard white. Antenna dark brown, with 8 flagollomeres; palpus dark brown, first segment longer than second, last one cylindrical with apex slightly enlarged; proboscis two times longer than head height; coxae, trochanters and femora dark brown, covered with dark gray pollinosity; tibiae and tarsi yellowish, tarsi covered with dense black hairs in dorsal view; wing infuscated with strong clouds (patches) on cross-veins, cell r 5 closed with a short petiole (Fig. 2 E); terminalia, hypandrium + gonocoxite enlarged, 1.5 x wider than long (Fig. 3 A – B); gonocoxite with lateral projections; gonostylus acuminate with pointed apex (Fig. 3 A – B); ejaculatory apodeme damaged; parameral sheath conical (Fig. 3 A – B); epandrium with lateral margins rounded and central area hollowed from anterior margin to mid-half (Fig. 3 C – D); cercus elongated, longer than mid-longitudinal length of epandrium.	en	Krolow, Tiago Kütter, Henriques, Augusto Loureiro, González, Christian R. (2016): Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical genus Caenopangonia Kröber, 1930 (Diptera: Tabanidae). Zootaxa 4154 (5): 541-558, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4154.5.3
03908794B261FFAA2AFF25FBDED6FE06.taxon	description	Female. For details see Coscarón & Philip (1979: 448) and comments below.	en	Krolow, Tiago Kütter, Henriques, Augusto Loureiro, González, Christian R. (2016): Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical genus Caenopangonia Kröber, 1930 (Diptera: Tabanidae). Zootaxa 4154 (5): 541-558, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4154.5.3
03908794B261FFAA2AFF25FBDED6FE06.taxon	materials_examined	Holotype. Not examined deposited in CAS, described as female but probably a male (see comments below).	en	Krolow, Tiago Kütter, Henriques, Augusto Loureiro, González, Christian R. (2016): Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical genus Caenopangonia Kröber, 1930 (Diptera: Tabanidae). Zootaxa 4154 (5): 541-558, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4154.5.3
03908794B261FFAA2AFF25FBDED6FE06.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Chile, Coquimbo region, Limarí province.	en	Krolow, Tiago Kütter, Henriques, Augusto Loureiro, González, Christian R. (2016): Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical genus Caenopangonia Kröber, 1930 (Diptera: Tabanidae). Zootaxa 4154 (5): 541-558, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4154.5.3
03908794B261FFAA2AFF25FBDED6FE06.taxon	materials_examined	Material examined. “ CHILE, Coquimbo, [Limarí], [Parque Nacional] Fra [y] Jorge, 4 – 5. xi. 1957, L. E. Peña ” “ Mycteromyia ♀ asper Phil. det. C. B. Philip 59 ” “ Caenopangonia asper (Philip) Ƌ det. Cos & Phil 76 ” “ Caenopangonia aspera (Philip) Ƌ det. Krolow, T. K. 2012 (Ƌ CAS).	en	Krolow, Tiago Kütter, Henriques, Augusto Loureiro, González, Christian R. (2016): Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical genus Caenopangonia Kröber, 1930 (Diptera: Tabanidae). Zootaxa 4154 (5): 541-558, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4154.5.3
03908794B261FFAA2AFF25FBDED6FE06.taxon	discussion	Comments. C. aspera was described by Philip (1958: 65) as female, but Coscarón & Philip (1979: 448) treated the female as unknown: “ we now have previously unknown females that can be associated readily with males ”, as a result the authors describe briefly the female, but do not provide any illustration. This inconsistency is probably due to the fact that Philip (1958) did not dissect the genitalia for the original description. The labels of examined specimens seem to confirm this idea (Fig. 2 F). Unfortunately, no females were analyzed in this study and its detailed and illustrated redescription is still pending. The only specimen examined was the same used by Coscarón & Philip (1979) to describe the male terminalia.	en	Krolow, Tiago Kütter, Henriques, Augusto Loureiro, González, Christian R. (2016): Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical genus Caenopangonia Kröber, 1930 (Diptera: Tabanidae). Zootaxa 4154 (5): 541-558, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4154.5.3
03908794B267FFAA2AFF2566D8AAF8B4.taxon	materials_examined	Type locality. Chile, Valdivia.	en	Krolow, Tiago Kütter, Henriques, Augusto Loureiro, González, Christian R. (2016): Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical genus Caenopangonia Kröber, 1930 (Diptera: Tabanidae). Zootaxa 4154 (5): 541-558, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4154.5.3
03908794B267FFAA2AFF2566D8AAF8B4.taxon	description	Redescription ♀. Medium sized (11.5 – 14 mm); body light brown to brown; thorax with two dark brown lateral stripes, contrasting with more distinct center stripe (in some specimens the contrast is not so evident) (Fig. 4 A – B); abdomen light brown with a median row of white triangles extending to lateral incisures on posterior margins of tergites (lost in some specimens) (Fig. 4 A, E); Frons, subcallus, parafacial, face, gena and occiput grayish (Fig. 4 C – D); frons parallel-sided, predominantly with brownish hairs and some sparse yellow hairs (some specimens are the opposite, predominantly yellow hairs and some brownish) (Fig. 4 C); face reduced, no longer than insertion of antenna (in one specimen little longer than insertion) (Fig. 4 D); beard white (yellowish in some specimens); Antenna, scape and pedicel light brown with black hairs contrasting with dark brown almost black flagellum; eight well defined flagellomeres (sometimes flagellomeres 2 – 3 are fused); palpus dark brown, variable in shape and size, first segment subequal to second or a little longer than second, apex of second clavate or more cylindrical; proboscis two times longer than height of head; legs yellowish brown, except for shiny brown trochanters; wing infuscated with clouds on cross-veins (clouds vary from clear to dark), cell r 5 with long petiole (Fig. 4 F); terminalia in posterior view as in figure 4 G; internal characters were described in diagnosis of genus (Fig. 5 A – C). Male. Unknown.	en	Krolow, Tiago Kütter, Henriques, Augusto Loureiro, González, Christian R. (2016): Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical genus Caenopangonia Kröber, 1930 (Diptera: Tabanidae). Zootaxa 4154 (5): 541-558, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4154.5.3
03908794B267FFAA2AFF2566D8AAF8B4.taxon	materials_examined	Holotype. ♀ lost, according Philip (1968: 12): “ M. brevirostris. No type was located by Kuschel or during my recent research ”.	en	Krolow, Tiago Kütter, Henriques, Augusto Loureiro, González, Christian R. (2016): Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical genus Caenopangonia Kröber, 1930 (Diptera: Tabanidae). Zootaxa 4154 (5): 541-558, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4154.5.3
03908794B267FFAA2AFF2566D8AAF8B4.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Chile (Ñuble, Arauco, Osorno, Valdivia), Argentina (Neuquén).	en	Krolow, Tiago Kütter, Henriques, Augusto Loureiro, González, Christian R. (2016): Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical genus Caenopangonia Kröber, 1930 (Diptera: Tabanidae). Zootaxa 4154 (5): 541-558, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4154.5.3
03908794B267FFAA2AFF2566D8AAF8B4.taxon	materials_examined	Material examined. ARGENTINA, Neuquén, P. Nac. Lanín, Lago Hermoso, xi. 1949, M. Barrera (♀ MZUSP); idem, Pucará, Lago Lácar, i. 1954, Duret (2 ♀ MZUSP); idem, Pucará, P. Nac. Lanín, xi. 1951, Schajovskoi (♀ MZUSP); CHILE, Alt Sammlung, Mycteromyia brevisrostris (Phi) det. C. B. Philip [19] 64 (♀ CAS); Arauco, Pichinahuel, cord. Nahuelbuta, 28. i. 1954, L. E. Peña (♀ CAS); idem, ibidem, 20 km W. Caramavida, 31 ° 42 ’ S – 73 ° 21 ’ W, 750 m, 31. i. [19] 67, E. I. Schlinger (2 ♀ CAS).	en	Krolow, Tiago Kütter, Henriques, Augusto Loureiro, González, Christian R. (2016): Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical genus Caenopangonia Kröber, 1930 (Diptera: Tabanidae). Zootaxa 4154 (5): 541-558, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4154.5.3
03908794B267FFAA2AFF2566D8AAF8B4.taxon	discussion	Comments. The holotype, deposited in the MNHNS, is probably destroyed. Philip (1968) searched for the type in Philippi’s material but it was not located and is probably non-extant.	en	Krolow, Tiago Kütter, Henriques, Augusto Loureiro, González, Christian R. (2016): Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical genus Caenopangonia Kröber, 1930 (Diptera: Tabanidae). Zootaxa 4154 (5): 541-558, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4154.5.3
03908794B265FFA62AFF2400D891FCAE.taxon	materials_examined	Type locality. Chile, Til Til, Cerro El Roble.	en	Krolow, Tiago Kütter, Henriques, Augusto Loureiro, González, Christian R. (2016): Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical genus Caenopangonia Kröber, 1930 (Diptera: Tabanidae). Zootaxa 4154 (5): 541-558, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4154.5.3
03908794B265FFA62AFF2400D891FCAE.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. A robust species, grayish thorax with dark brown almost black scutal stripes, covered with mixed yellowish, orange and black hairs, wing infuscated with indistinct clouds on cross-veins, legs bicolored and a rounded orange brown abdomen.	en	Krolow, Tiago Kütter, Henriques, Augusto Loureiro, González, Christian R. (2016): Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical genus Caenopangonia Kröber, 1930 (Diptera: Tabanidae). Zootaxa 4154 (5): 541-558, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4154.5.3
03908794B265FFA62AFF2400D891FCAE.taxon	description	Description, holotype Ƌ. Medium sized (14.0 mm) (Fig. 6 A – B), wing 13.0 mm in length (Fig. 6 E). Head. Frons, subcallus, parafacial, face, gena and occiput predominantly grayish (Fig. 6 C – D); frons parallel-sided, with long black and some yellowish hairs, dense area of black hairs immediately above insertion of antenna (Fig. 6 C); subcallus mostly with yellowish hairs but some black; face produced exceeding insertion of antenna and reaching apex of pedicel, with black and yellowish hairs (Fig. 6 D); beard yellowish-white with a few black hairs (Fig. 6 D); Antenna bicolored, scape and pedicel covered with grayish pollinosity, this absent in contrasting black flagellum; flagellum with eight flagellomeres, first flagellomere 1.5 x longer than high; palpus nearly black with black and some long yellowish hairs on first segment, first segment longer than second, apex of second slightly enlarged; proboscis black and slender, more than two times longer than height of head, theca covered with short setae, labella very slender without any enlargement. Thorax. scutum grayish with scutal stripes dark brown, almost black, covered with mixed yellowish, orange and black hairs (Fig. 6 A); pleuron dark grayish mostly with yellowish hairs (Fig. 6 B); legs bicolored, coxae, trochanters and proximal 2 / 3 of femora dark grayish blending with color of pleuron; distal third of femora, tibiae and tarsi yellowish to orange with orange pilosity, except for dorsal sides of tibiae and tarsi are covered with dark pilosity; wing infuscated with indistinct clouds on cross-veins; cell r 5 closed with long petiole, and with long appendix on R 4 (Fig. 6 E); calypteres with orange hairs. Abdomen. Rounded, orange brown, tergites II – III greatly enlarged, narrowing from tergites IV – VII with apex pointed; tergite I dark grayish with yellowish hairs (Fig. 6 A); tergites II – III completely orange with pilosity of same color, except for large median row of black hairs covered by white haired triangles; tergites IV – VII darkened, covered with black hairs; traces of triangles are presents on tergites IV – VII (probably rubbed); sternite I grayish with black hairs; sternites II – IV orange with black hairs; sternites V – VII darkened with black hairs. Terminalia. hypandrium + gonocoxite very enlarged (distinctly wider than long) (Fig. 7 A – B); gonocoxite with slight anterolateral projections; gonostylus apex truncated with large rounded lobe (Fig. 7 A – B); ejaculatory apodeme narrowed anteriorly in dorsal and ventral views (Fig. 7 A – B), enlarged and keel-like in lateral and anterior views (Fig. 7 C – D); gonocoxal apodeme twisted, shorter than ejaculatory apodeme; parameral sheath triangular with apex slightly longer than gonocoxite (Fig. 7 A – B); epandrium with lateral margins horseshoe-like, hollowed, forming two parts, joined by narrow posterior band (Fig. 7 E – G); cercus slender with pointed apex. Paratype variation. Body size 12.7 – 14 mm; palpus segments subequal in length. Female. Unknown.	en	Krolow, Tiago Kütter, Henriques, Augusto Loureiro, González, Christian R. (2016): Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical genus Caenopangonia Kröber, 1930 (Diptera: Tabanidae). Zootaxa 4154 (5): 541-558, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4154.5.3
03908794B265FFA62AFF2400D891FCAE.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Chile (Región Metropolitana, Chacabuco province, Til Til).	en	Krolow, Tiago Kütter, Henriques, Augusto Loureiro, González, Christian R. (2016): Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical genus Caenopangonia Kröber, 1930 (Diptera: Tabanidae). Zootaxa 4154 (5): 541-558, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4154.5.3
03908794B265FFA62AFF2400D891FCAE.taxon	materials_examined	Type material: Holotype Ƌ. “ [CHILE], Til Til, C [err] o El Roble, [0] 8. ii. 1994, Dr. M. Cerda (MNHNS) ”. Paratypes 4 Ƌ. “ [CHILE], Til Til, C [err] o El Roble, [0] 8. ii. 1994, Dr. M. Cerda (Ƌ MNHNS) ”; “ [CHILE], Til Til, C [err] o El Roble, 1700 m, 14. iii. 1992, Dr. M. Cerda (2 Ƌ MNHNS) ”; “ [CHILE], Til Til, Caleu, C [err] o El Roble, 14. iii. 1992, Dr. M. Cerda (Ƌ INPA) ”.	en	Krolow, Tiago Kütter, Henriques, Augusto Loureiro, González, Christian R. (2016): Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical genus Caenopangonia Kröber, 1930 (Diptera: Tabanidae). Zootaxa 4154 (5): 541-558, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4154.5.3
03908794B265FFA62AFF2400D891FCAE.taxon	etymology	Etymology. Specific epithet is a tribute to the medical doctor Miguel Cerda an enthusiastic amateur entomologist from Chile.	en	Krolow, Tiago Kütter, Henriques, Augusto Loureiro, González, Christian R. (2016): Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical genus Caenopangonia Kröber, 1930 (Diptera: Tabanidae). Zootaxa 4154 (5): 541-558, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4154.5.3
03908794B265FFA62AFF2400D891FCAE.taxon	discussion	Comments. C. cerdai n. sp. differs from the other species of Caenopangonia in the following characters: face produced exceeding the insertion of antenna and reaching the apex of pedicel; antennae bicolored (shared with C. brevirostris); abdomen rounded orange brown with apex pointed; hypandrium + gonocoxite enlarged; gonocoxite with slightly lateral projections; gonostylus apex with large rounded lobe.	en	Krolow, Tiago Kütter, Henriques, Augusto Loureiro, González, Christian R. (2016): Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical genus Caenopangonia Kröber, 1930 (Diptera: Tabanidae). Zootaxa 4154 (5): 541-558, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4154.5.3
03908794B26BFFA52AFF248BDA90FEB3.taxon	materials_examined	Type locality. Chile, Región de la Araucanía, Malleco, Curacautín, Termas de Tolhuaca.	en	Krolow, Tiago Kütter, Henriques, Augusto Loureiro, González, Christian R. (2016): Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical genus Caenopangonia Kröber, 1930 (Diptera: Tabanidae). Zootaxa 4154 (5): 541-558, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4154.5.3
03908794B26BFFA52AFF248BDA90FEB3.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Body grayish brown covered with golden pilosity and a very long wing. Abdomen slender, dark brown with golden pilosity.	en	Krolow, Tiago Kütter, Henriques, Augusto Loureiro, González, Christian R. (2016): Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical genus Caenopangonia Kröber, 1930 (Diptera: Tabanidae). Zootaxa 4154 (5): 541-558, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4154.5.3
03908794B26BFFA52AFF248BDA90FEB3.taxon	description	Description, holotype Ƌ. Body sized (11.9 mm) (Fig. 8 A – B), wings (12,1 mm) (Fig. 8 E – F). Head. frons, subcallus, parafacial, face, gena and occiput predominantly dark grayish with golden pilosity (Fig. 8 C – D); frons with parallel sides (Fig. 8 C); face short, not exceeding the insertion of antenna (Fig. 8 D); beard golden (Fig. 8 D); Antenna black with golden hairs; flagellum with eight flagellomeres, first flagellomere subequal (longer than high); palpus black with golden hairs, first segment shorter than second (almost subequal), apex of second enlarged (clavate); proboscis dark brown and slender, 2.5 x longer than height of head, theca covered with short setae black and golden, labella brown, very slender without any enlargement. Thorax. scutum and pleuron dark grayish with golden pilosity (Fig. 8 A – D); legs bicolored, coxae, trochanters and proximal 2 / 3 of fore and hind femora dark grayish blending with color of pleuron, with golden pilosity (right fore leg broken; midlegs lost); distal third of hind femora, tibiae and tarsi yellowish with golden pilosity, except tarsi covered dorsally with dark pilosity; wing infuscated with indistinct clouds on cross-veins; cell r 5 closed with short petiole, long appendix on R 4 vein (Fig. 8 E – F); calypters with golden hairs; right wing with incomplete M 3. Abdomen. slender, dark brown with golden pilosity, most prominent a mid-row of golden triangles and lateral incisures (Fig. 8 A); sternites yellowish to brown with golden pilosity. Terminalia. hypandrium + gonocoxite slightly enlarged (almost subequal, wider than long) (Fig. 9 A – B); hypandrium + gonocoxite with internal margins semicircular (Fig. 9 B); gonocoxite without lateral projections; gonostylus apex truncate with two small pointed lobes; ejaculatory apodeme enlarged anteriorly keellike (Fig. 9 C – D); parameral sheath subconical, enlarged anteriorly (Fig. 9 A – B); epandrium with anterior lateral margins slender, pointed and slightly curved (Fig. 9 E – F); cercus slender approximately 1 / 3 length of epandrium. Female. Unknown.	en	Krolow, Tiago Kütter, Henriques, Augusto Loureiro, González, Christian R. (2016): Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical genus Caenopangonia Kröber, 1930 (Diptera: Tabanidae). Zootaxa 4154 (5): 541-558, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4154.5.3
03908794B26BFFA52AFF248BDA90FEB3.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Chile (Región de la Araucanía, Malleco province).	en	Krolow, Tiago Kütter, Henriques, Augusto Loureiro, González, Christian R. (2016): Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical genus Caenopangonia Kröber, 1930 (Diptera: Tabanidae). Zootaxa 4154 (5): 541-558, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4154.5.3
03908794B26BFFA52AFF248BDA90FEB3.taxon	materials_examined	Type material: Holotype Ƌ. “ CHILE, Araucanía Region, Malleco, Curacautín, Termas Tolhuaca, 15 – 20. i. 1959, L. E. Peña (CAS) ”.	en	Krolow, Tiago Kütter, Henriques, Augusto Loureiro, González, Christian R. (2016): Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical genus Caenopangonia Kröber, 1930 (Diptera: Tabanidae). Zootaxa 4154 (5): 541-558, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4154.5.3
03908794B26BFFA52AFF248BDA90FEB3.taxon	etymology	Etymology. Patronym for Dr. Sixto Coscarón, Universidad Nacional de La Plata (Argentina), friend and Neotropical specialist in the family Tabanidae.	en	Krolow, Tiago Kütter, Henriques, Augusto Loureiro, González, Christian R. (2016): Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical genus Caenopangonia Kröber, 1930 (Diptera: Tabanidae). Zootaxa 4154 (5): 541-558, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4154.5.3
03908794B26BFFA52AFF248BDA90FEB3.taxon	discussion	Comments. C. coscaroni n. sp. is easily distinguished from other species of Caenopangonia by their conspicuous golden pilosity. Except to C. hirtipalpis which is very close, but the following characters allow differentiation: the color of body; antenna black with golden hairs; palpus black with golden hairs, with apex of second segment clavate; apex of gonostylus truncate with two small pointed lobes; anterior margins of epandrium pointed and slightly curved.	en	Krolow, Tiago Kütter, Henriques, Augusto Loureiro, González, Christian R. (2016): Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical genus Caenopangonia Kröber, 1930 (Diptera: Tabanidae). Zootaxa 4154 (5): 541-558, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4154.5.3
03908794B269FFA02AFF23B1D9B2F893.taxon	materials_examined	Type locality. “ Chile ”.	en	Krolow, Tiago Kütter, Henriques, Augusto Loureiro, González, Christian R. (2016): Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical genus Caenopangonia Kröber, 1930 (Diptera: Tabanidae). Zootaxa 4154 (5): 541-558, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4154.5.3
03908794B269FFA02AFF23B1D9B2F893.taxon	description	Redescription Ƌ. Medium sized (9 – 13 mm); generally dark brown species, but variable in color of body and pilosity (Figs. 10 A; 12 A; 13 A; 14 A); head and thorax pollinosity grayish; scutum grayish with two lateral stripes (dark brown to black), contrasting with paler center stripe, covered with black, white and yellowish hairs (variable) (Figs. 10 A; 12 A; 13 A; 14 A); Pleuron dark grayish with white to yellowish hairs (Figs. 10 B; 12 B; 13 B; 14 B); abdomen predominantly dark brown with dark hairs and median row of pale triangles and lateral incisures from tergites II – V (colors of triangles and lateral incisures are very varied, from white, mix yellowish-white, and only yellowish) (Figs. 10 A; 12 A; 13 A; 14 A); tergite I grayish as in thorax, with transverse incisures of pale hairs; Frons, subcallus, parafacial, face, gena and occiput gray (Figs. 10 B – C; 12 B – C; 13 B – C; 14 B – C); frons parallel-sided, with long black hairs and some yellowish (Figs. 10 C; 12 C; 13 C; 14 C); face reduced, ends on insertion of antenna, with black and yellowish hairs (Fig. 10 B); beard white to yellowish-white; Antenna dark brown to almost black, scape and pedicel covered with grayish pollinosity, absent in flagellum (eight flagellomeres); palpus dark brown with black hairs, segments subequal in length, second with apex slightly enlarged; proboscis two times longer than height of head; legs variable; coxae dark grayish similar to the pleuron; trochanters and femora dark brown to black (very variable), frequently clearer on distal third of femora, with pilosity white to yellowish; tibiae and tarsi yellowish brown to black, covered with dark hairs; wing strongly infuscated with marked clouds on cross-veins, cell r 5 with long petiole (Fig. 10 D; 12 D; 14 D); male terminalia, hypandrium + gonocoxite slightly enlarged (almost subequal, little more wide than long) (Fig. 11 A – B); hypandrium + gonocoxite with internal margins horseshoe-like (Fig. 11 B); gonocoxite without lateral projections; gonostylus apex truncated with two small rounded lobes; ejaculatory apodeme enlarged anteriorly keel-like (Fig. 11 C – D); parameral sheath subconical, enlarged anteriorly (Fig. 11 A – B); epandrium with anterior lateral margins pointed (Fig. 11 E – F); cercus elongated, approximately half as long as length of epandrium; female terminalia without illustrations or description, comments in Coscarón & Philip (1979: 446). Female. No female was analyzed in this study, see comments below.	en	Krolow, Tiago Kütter, Henriques, Augusto Loureiro, González, Christian R. (2016): Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical genus Caenopangonia Kröber, 1930 (Diptera: Tabanidae). Zootaxa 4154 (5): 541-558, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4154.5.3
03908794B269FFA02AFF23B1D9B2F893.taxon	materials_examined	Holotype. Diatomineura hirtipalpis Bigot, 1892, Ƌ deposited at BMNH, examined photographically (Fig. 12 A – F). Synonyms. Holotype and two paratypes of Mycteromyia bejaranoi Barretto & Duret, 1954 (3 Ƌ MZSUP) and the holotype of Mycteromyia edwardsi Kröber, 1930 (Ƌ BMNH) were examined photographically, figures 13 A – F and 14 A – F respectively.	en	Krolow, Tiago Kütter, Henriques, Augusto Loureiro, González, Christian R. (2016): Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical genus Caenopangonia Kröber, 1930 (Diptera: Tabanidae). Zootaxa 4154 (5): 541-558, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4154.5.3
03908794B269FFA02AFF23B1D9B2F893.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Chile (Curicó, Ñuble, Concepción, Arauco, Malleco, Cautín, Valdivia, Osorno), Argentina (Neuquén).	en	Krolow, Tiago Kütter, Henriques, Augusto Loureiro, González, Christian R. (2016): Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical genus Caenopangonia Kröber, 1930 (Diptera: Tabanidae). Zootaxa 4154 (5): 541-558, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4154.5.3
03908794B269FFA02AFF23B1D9B2F893.taxon	materials_examined	Material examined. ARGENTINA, Neuquén, Pucará, P. Nac. Lanín, xi. 1952, Schajovskoi, Mycteromyia bejaranoi B. & D. (Ƌ MZUSP); idem, xii. 1951, ibidem, Mycteromyia bejaranoi Barr. & Dur. (Ƌ MZUSP); idem, Pucará, [0] 5. i. 1951, Schajovskoi, Compared with type Ƌ Mycteromyia edwardsi Krb. C. B. Philip Aug [19] 53, Comp. with type ♀ Diatomineura hirtipalpis Big. C. B. Philip Aug [19] 53 agrees (Ƌ CAS); idem, Pucará, xii. 1952, Schajovskoi, Mycteromyia bejaranoi det. B. & D. Ƌ, Caenopangonia hirtipalpis (Bigot) det. Cosc. & Phil. 76 (Ƌ MZUSP); idem, Pucará, Lago Lácar, i. 1954, Duret, Mycteromyia bejaranoi det. Barr. & Dur. (2 Ƌ MZUSP); CHILE, Vilcún, Prov. Cautín, 15. xii. 1954, A. Burgos, Mycteromyia hirtipalpis det. Philip [19] 65 (Ƌ CAS); idem, [Malleco], Tolhuaca, i. [19] 22, E. F. Reed, Mycteromyia fusca det. Dr. Reed, Compared with type Ƌ ♀ Mycteromyia edwardsi Krb C. B. Philip Aug [19] 53, Comp. with type ♀ Diatomineura hirtipalpis Big. C. B. Philip Aug [19] 53 agrees (Ƌ CAS); Valdivia, Sto. Domingo, [0] 8. xi. 1981, E. Kramer, Caenopangonia hirtipalpis (Bigot) det. C. González 1991 (Ƌ MNHNS); [Arauco], [Pichinahuel], Parque Nahuelbuta, 15. i. 1978, P. Cerda (♂ INPA); idem, cord. Nahuelbuta, 20 km W. Caramavida, 31 ° 47 ’ S – 73 ° 21 ’ W, 750 m, 31. i. [19] 67, E. I. Schlinger, Mycteromyia hirtipalpis (Bigot) det. W. Middlekauft (Ƌ CAS); idem, Pillim Pilli, 15. i. [19] 54, L. E. Peña (Ƌ CAS); Curicó, El Coigual, 20 – 26. i. 1964, L. E. Peña (2 Ƌ CAS); idem, 11. i. 1956, ibidem, probably n. sp. closer to murina, Mycteromyia hirtipalpis ♀ (Big) det. C. B. Philip [19] 56 (Ƌ CAS); idem, El Buchen, 8 – 9. i. 1961, L. Peña (Ƌ CAS); [Cautín], 20 km E. of Temuco, 8. i. [19] 51, Ross and Michelbacher, Mycteromyia murina Phil ♀ det. C. B. Philip [19] 55 (2 # m CAS); Ñuble, Las Trancas, 23. i. 1955, L. E. Peña, Mycteromyia hirtipalpis ♀ (Big) det. C. B. Philip [19] 56 (Ƌ CAS); idem, Las Trancas, 28. i. 1967, E. I. Schlinger (Ƌ CAS).	en	Krolow, Tiago Kütter, Henriques, Augusto Loureiro, González, Christian R. (2016): Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical genus Caenopangonia Kröber, 1930 (Diptera: Tabanidae). Zootaxa 4154 (5): 541-558, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4154.5.3
03908794B269FFA02AFF23B1D9B2F893.taxon	discussion	Comments. Only two females of C. hirtipalpis are known, the first by Kröber (1930 a, 1930 b) in description of genus Caenopangonia from Chile (Valdivia), probably in error, no terminalia characters given. A second was recorded by Coscarón & Philip (1979) for Chile (Ñuble, Las Cabras), and according the authors (1979: 446): “ the only specimen available is a little lighter brown with triangles and lateral incisures well defined, the former crossing tergites. Length 12 mm, wing 11 mm, proboscis 4.5 mm, ratio palpus: wing 1: 13.7. Genitalia: no significant differences from C. brevirostris ”. This information seems somewhat uncertain, since no illustration of the body or terminalia has been provided and sexing errors are common in Caenopangonia. For example, in most specimens of C. hirtipalpis studied by C. B. Philip, the determination labels treated the examined specimens as female. The separation of males and females without dissection of the terminalia could be an arduous task in Caenopangonia. Two classic cases are known, C. aspera (see comments above) and the synonym Mycteromyia bejaranoi Barretto & Duret, 1954, that was described as female but it is a male (Fig. 13 A – C). Additionally, the sympatric distribution of the female of C. brevirostris and the male of C. hirtipalpis, and the absence of complementary sexes or doubtful status of the C. hirtipalpis female, begs the inevitable question: are they synonyms? Coscarón & Philip (1979: 448) stated: “ The variation in size and ornamentation of our inadequate series of specimens, some of them with variable median triangles, suggests that as more material becomes available, this species may be synonymized with the sympatric and also widely variable hirtipalpis. ”. Although both species have been described for more than 120 years, little material has been collected since the last work of Coscarón & Philip (1979), and most of the material examined in this review is the same that those authors examined. Additionally, C. hirtipalpis and C. brevirostris are very different in body color of and structures, which would be a case of pronounced sexual dimorphism, so uncommon in Tabanidae. Extra comment. Regarding the types of Mycteromyia bejaranoi Barretto & Duret, 1954. Many incongruities have been observed in the publications and labels of Barretto & Duret (1954) and Coscarón & Philip (1979). Barretto & Duret (1954) described the species based on female specimens (one holotype and two paratypes). In the paper the holotype is from Lago Hermoso, Parque Nacional Lanín, Neuquén, Argentina, collected by Barrera, without date, deposited in the Duret collection. The two paratypes are from Pucará, Neuquén, Argentina, collected by Schajovskoi, on “ XIII. 1950 ” (sic), and deposited in the Duret Collection and Coleção do Departamento de Parasitologia da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto (Brazil). To Coscarón & Philip (1979) the holotype was a male from Pucará, San Martin de Los Andes, Neuquén, Argentina, collected by Schajovskoi, on XII. 1948. Furthermore, three male paratypes were listed, all from Pucará and collected by Schajovskoi, but on different dates, 22. XII. 1950; –. XI. 1952 and 5. I. 1951. Currently the type material of Barretto & Duret is deposited in MZUSP and the labels show significant differences in comparison to the data presented in the forementioned publications: holotype without sex on the label, from Lago Hermoso, Parque Nacional Lanín, Neuquén, Argentina, Dic [XII]. 1949, collected by Barrera (Fig. 13 D); paratypes: a male from Pucará, Neuquén, Argentina, 18. XII. 1950, collected by Schajovskoi (Fig. 13 E); no sex in label, from Pucará, Neuquén, Argentina, 22. XII. 1950, collected by Schajovskoi (Fig. 13 F). Additionaly we examined one male from Pucará, XI. 1952, collected by Schajovskoi (Fig. 13 G), same date cited by Coscarón & Philip (1979) to one of paratypes, however this specimen did not have any paratype label. Given these examples, we noticed that there were errors in the citation of material examined by Barretto & Duret (1954: 208) and Coscarón & Philip (1979: 446), and based on the labels of the specimens, the recognized types are obviously those examined in figures 13 A – F.	en	Krolow, Tiago Kütter, Henriques, Augusto Loureiro, González, Christian R. (2016): Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical genus Caenopangonia Kröber, 1930 (Diptera: Tabanidae). Zootaxa 4154 (5): 541-558, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4154.5.3
