identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
039187CA3936FFF46EB8FCC942EB973D.text	039187CA3936FFF46EB8FCC942EB973D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Eutichurus Simon 1897	<div><p>Eutichurus Simon, 1897</p><p>Eutichurus Simon, 1897a: 501; 1897b: 88, 89;</p><p>(formal description and designation of the type species, E. ferox Simon, 1897)</p><p>; Bonaldo 1994: 107; Bonaldo et al. 2018; World Spider Catalog 2025.</p><p>Diagnosis and description. For diagnosis and description of the genus, see Bonaldo (1994) and Bonaldo et al. (2018).</p><p>Composition. 38 species: E. abiseo Bonaldo, 1994, E. arnoi Bonaldo, 1994, E. chicaque sp. nov., E. chingliputensis Majumder &amp; Tikader, 1991, E. cumbia Bonaldo &amp; Ramírez, 2018, E. cuzco Bonaldo, 1994, E. ferox Simon, 1897, E. furcifer Kraus 1955, E. ibiuna Bonaldo, 1994, E. itamaraju Bonaldo, 1994, E. keyserlingi Simon 1897, E. lizeri Mello-Leitão, 1938, E. luisdiazi sp. nov., E. luridus Simon, 1897, E. madre Bonaldo, 1994, E. manu Bonaldo, 1994, E. marquesae Bonaldo, 1994, E. meta sp. nov., E. murgai Bonaldo &amp; Lise, 2018, E. muisca sp. nov., E. nancyae Bonaldo &amp; Saturnino, 2018, E. pallatanga Bonaldo, 1994, E. paredesi Bonaldo &amp; Saturnino, 2018, E. putus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1898, E. ravidus Simon, 1897, E. saylapampa Bonaldo, 1994, E. sigillatus Chickering, 1937, E. silvae Bonaldo, 1994, E. tendetza Peñaherrera, Campoverde, Molina &amp; Heredia, 2024, E. tequendama Bonaldo &amp; Lise, 2018, E. tezpurensis Biswas, 1991, E. tibacuy sp. nov., E. tropicus (Koch 1866), E. valderramai Bonaldo, 1994, E. yalen Bonaldo, 1994, E. yariguies sp. nov., E. yungas Bonaldo &amp; Ramírez, 2018, E. zarate Bonaldo, 1994 .</p><p>Distribution. Costa Rica, El Salvador, Panama, Colombia, Ecuador, Bolivia, Peru, Brasil, Uruguay and Argentina (Bonaldo et al. 2018). The World Spider Catalog (2025) includes three additional species, regarded by Bonaldo et al. (2018) as misplaced in the genus, two from India, E. chingliputensis Majumder &amp; Tikader, 1991 and E. tezpurensis Biswas, 1991, and one from Colombia, E. keyserlingi Simon, 1897 . These species have not yet been formally assigned to other genera.</p><p>Key to species of Eutichurus (updated from Bonaldo et al. 2018)</p><p>1). Males (those of E. manu, E. saylapampa, E. yariguies sp. nov., and E. tendetza unknown)........................... 2 Females (those of Eutichurus meta sp. nov., E. abiseo, E. cuzco, E. pallatanga, and E. yalen, unknown)............... 33</p><p>2(1). Retrolateral tibial apophysis represented by a single branch (Figs 2B–C, 13B–C; Bonaldo 1994: figs 19, 29, 38, 48, 56, 64). 3 Retrolateral tibial apophysis bifid or trifid (Figs 15B–C, 16B–C; Bonaldo 1994: figs 34, 66, 76, 86, 91)................ 24</p><p>3(2). Retrolateral tibial apophysis tuberculate, with a small apical projection (Bonaldo 1994: figs 56, 57)........ E. furcifer Kraus Retrolateral tibial apophysis otherwise (Figs 7B–C, 4B–C; Bonaldo 1994: figs 19, 29, 38, 48, 64)..................... 4</p><p>4(3). Retrolateral tibial apophysis short, excavated, MA with a longitudinal median keel (Fig 4B–C; Bonaldo 1994: figs 43, 45, 48, 49)................................................................................................. 5 Retrolateral tibial apophysis long, not excavated, MA without such keel (Bonaldo 1994: figs 19, 22, 26, 29, 35, 38, 62).... 7</p><p>5(4). Embolus without a sharp prolateral process (Fig. 4A–B; Bonaldo 1994: figs 48, 49)............... E. valderramai Bonaldo Embolus with a sharp prolateral process (Figs 11A–C, 14A–D; Bonaldo 1994: figs 43, 44)........................... 6</p><p>6(5). Prolateral process of embolus small, located medially (Fig. 11A–B; Bonaldo 1994: figs 43–45)....... E. tropicus (L. Koch) Prolateral process of embolus long, located basally (Fig. 6A–B)............................. E. andresgarcia sp. nov.</p><p>7(4). Embolar base fused to the tegulum (Bonaldo 1994: fig. 35).................................................... 8 Embolus articulated, connected to the tegulum by a membrane (Fig. 13B; Bonaldo 1994: figs 19, 22, 30, 26, 38, 62)....... 9</p><p>8(7). Embolus with lamellar tip (Bonaldo 1994: figs 35, 36).......................................... E. abiseo Bonaldo Embolus filiform (Bonaldo et al. 2018: figs 1, 2).................................. E. paredesi Bonaldo &amp; Saturnino</p><p>9(7). Embolus with a small, retrolateral sub-apical process (Fig. 13B–C, Bonaldo 1994: figs 62, 63; Laborda &amp; Simó 2015: fig. 1A)............................................................................................... 10 Embolus without any process (Bonaldo et al. 2018: figs 5, 10; Bonaldo 1994: figs 19, 22, 26) or with a prolateral process (Figs 13A–C, 14A–D; Bonaldo 1994: figs 30, 39)............................................................... 11</p><p>10(9). Palpal tibia long, about the same length as the cymbium, embolus filiform with a non-pointed prolateral process (Bonaldo 1994: figs 62, 63; Laborda &amp; Simó 2015: fig. 1A)........................................... Eutichurus ibiuna Bonaldo Palpal tibia short, less than half the length of the cymbium, embolus laminar with an apical notch and a pointed, spur-shaped retrolateral process (Figs 13A–C, 14A–D)............................................... Eutichurus meta sp. nov.</p><p>11(9). Embolus with a prolateral process (Fig. 11A–B, D; Bonaldo et al. 2018: figs 16, 21, 28; Bonaldo 1994: figs 30, 39)...... 12 Embolus without process (Bonaldo 1994: figs 19, 22, 26).................................................... 19</p><p>12(11). Median apophysis strongly sculptured, with several conspicuous sulci (Bonaldo 1994: figs 29, 31)........ E. cuzco Bonaldo Median apophysis not strongly sculptured (Figs 11B–C, 11B–C; Bonaldo et al. 2018: figs 15, 20, 27, 58; Bonaldo 1994: figs 38, 40)............................................................................................. 13</p><p>13(12). Embolar prolateral process inserted medially (Figs 11B–C, 11B–C; Bonaldo et al. 2018: fig. 28; Bonaldo 1994: fig. 39)... 14 Embolar prolateral process inserted sub-apically (Bonaldo et al. 2018: figs 21, 59)................................ 16</p><p>14(13). Median prong of MA short (Bonaldo 1994: figs 38, 40; Ramírez 2014, fig. 147A, C)................ E. lizeri Mello-Leitão Median prong of MA long (Figs 11B–C, 11B–C; Bonaldo et al. 2018: figs 27, 29)................................. 15</p><p>15(14). Embolar prolateral process laminar, very wide, not filiform; RTA straight in retrolateral view, not notched (Figs 11B–C, 11B– C).................................................................................. E. luisdiazi sp. nov. Embolar prolateral process conspicuous; tip of MA small; RTA broadened medially, without an oblique keel (Fig. 6A–B; Bonaldo et al. 2018: figs 27–29)........................................................ E. marquesae Bonaldo</p><p>16(13). Embolus narrow and long relative to tegulum (Bonaldo et al. 2018: figs 20, 21, 23, 24)............................. 17 Embolus wide and short relative to tegulum, MA less developed, distinctly smaller than the embolus (Figs 8A–C, 9A–C; Bonaldo et al. 2018: figs 58–59)........................................................................ 18</p><p>17(16). Median prong of MA with a pair of apical projections (Bonaldo et al. 2018: figs 20, 22)..... E. tequendama Bonaldo &amp; Lise Median prong of MA without apical projections (Bonaldo et al. 2018: figs 23, 25)..................... E. madre Bonaldo</p><p>18(16). RTA narrow and long; pars pendula present; MA without median prong (Bonaldo et al. 2018: figs 58–60)..................................................................................... E. nancyae Bonaldo &amp; Saturnino, 2018 RTA wide and short; pars pendula absent; MA with median prong (Figs 8A–C, 9A–C)................ E. muisca sp. nov.</p><p>19(11). Embolus flattened; prolateral margin of MA with transversal ridges (Bonaldo 1994: figs 26, 28).......... E. yalen Bonaldo Embolus conic, MA without transversal ridges (Bonaldo et al. 2018: figs 5, 10; Bonaldo 1994: figs 19, 22)............. 20</p><p>20(19). RTA expanded distally (Bonaldo et al. 2018: figs 6, 11)...................................................... 21 RTA tapering toward apex (Figs 1A–C, 2A–D; Bonaldo 1994: figs 20, 23)....................................... 22</p><p>21(20). Conductor hyaline (Bonaldo et al. 2018: fig. 4).......................................... E. murgai Bonaldo &amp; Lise Conductor partially sclerotized (Bonaldo et al. 2018: fig. 9)....................................... E. zarate Bonaldo</p><p>22(20). RTA gradually tapering from base; embolus inserted basally (Figs 1A–C, 2A–D; Bonaldo 1994: figs 19, 20)............ 23 RTA abruptly tapering from distal third; embolus inserted medially (Bonaldo 1994: figs 22, 23).......... E. silvae Bonaldo</p><p>23(22). RTA with a laminar small medial projection on internal margin; MA tapering to apex (Figs 1A–C, 2A–D).. E. arnoi Bonaldo RTA without projections; MA widening and not pointed apically (Bonaldo 1994: figs 19–20).............. E. ferox Simon</p><p>24(2). RTA bifid (Fig. 25A–C; Bonaldo et al. 2018: figs 14, 17; Bonaldo 1994: figs 34, 67, 76)............................ 25 RTA trifid (Figs 16B–C, 17C–D, 6B–C; Bonaldo 1994: figs 86, 91)............................................ 30</p><p>25(24). RTA divided medially; median prong of MA present (Bonaldo et al. 2018: fig. 17; Bonaldo 1994: figs 32, 34)........... 26 RTA divided basally; median prong of MA absent (Fig. 25A–C; Bonaldo et al. 2018: fig. 14; Bonaldo 1994: figs 67, 72, 76)................................................................................................... 27</p><p>26(25). Embolus without prolateral process, tapering distally (Bonaldo 1994: figs 32, 33)................. E. pallatanga Bonaldo Embolus with prolateral process, distally wide (Bonaldo et al. 2018: figs 15, 16)............ E. yungas Bonaldo &amp; Ramírez</p><p>27(25). Embolus conic, without processes (Bonaldo 1994: figs 75, 76).................................... E. luridus Simon Embolus flattened, with prolateral process (Fig. 25A–C; Bonaldo et al. 2018: fig. 13; Bonaldo 1994: figs 65, 70)........ 28</p><p>28(27). MA long, apex prolaterally oriented; dorsal prong of RTA shorter than ventral (Fig. 25A–C; Bonaldo et al. 2018: figs 12, 14)........................................................................... E. cumbia Bonaldo &amp; Ramírez MA short, apex oriented proximally; prongs of RTA similar in size (Bonaldo 1994: figs 67, 72)...................... 29</p><p>29(28). Apex of embolar process acute; embolus apex apically oriented (Bonaldo 1994: figs 65–67)............. E. ravidus Simon Apex of embolar process rounded; embolus apex prolaterally oriented (Bonaldo 1994: figs 70–72)..... E. itajamaru Bonaldo</p><p>30(24). Apex of MA wide; embolar apex bifid (Fig. 17A–D; Bonaldo 1994: figs 89, 91)........... E. putus O. Pickard-Cambridge Apex of MA narrow; embolar apex trifid (Figs 15A–C, 16B–C; Bonaldo 1994: figs 84, 86).......................... 31</p><p>31(30). RTA with three pointed branches; prolateral branch of embolus poorly developed (Fig. 19B–C; Bonaldo 1994: figs 84, 86)..</p><p>................................................................................. E. sigillatus Chickering RTA with rounded branches; prolateral embolar branch well developed (Figs 15A–C, 16A–C).......... E. tibacuy sp. nov.</p><p>33(1). Epigynal posterior plates fused, with a longitudinal median suture (Figs 24A–D, 15D–E, 16E–F; Bonaldo et al. 2018: fig. 18; Bonaldo 1994: figs 41, 82, 87, 92)....................................................................... 34 Epigynal posterior plates not fused medially (Fig. 11E–F; Bonaldo et al. 2018: figs 7, 52; Bonaldo 1994: figs 21, 46, 59, 68)................................................................................................... 40</p><p>36(34). Median field longer than wide; anterior margins of posterior plates W-shaped (Figs 24A–D, 15D–E, 16E–F; Bonaldo 1994: figs 87, 88)............................................................................................. 37 Median field as long as wide, without projection; anterior margins otherwise (Bonaldo 1994: figs 82, 92).............. 39</p><p>38(37). Median field with median depression; anterior projections very elongate; stem of S2 thicker (Figs 15D–E, 16E–F)..................................................................................................... E. tibacuy Median field without depression; stem of S2 thinner (Fig. 24A–D)..................................... E. yariguies</p><p>40(33). Anterior projections reduced, inconspicuous (Bonaldo et al. 2018: fig. 61)............... E. nancyae Bonaldo &amp; Saturnino Anterior projections conspicuous (Fig. 4D–E; Bonaldo et al. 2018: figs 7, 52; Bonaldo 1994: figs 21, 46, 54)........... 41</p><p>43(42). Anterior projections larger or slightly smaller than posterior plates (Fig. 4D–E; Bonaldo et al. 2018: fig. 7; Bonaldo 1994: figs 21, 24, 46, 50, 52, 53)................................................................................. 44 Anterior projections distinctly smaller than posterior plates (Figs 11E–F, 7E–F; Bonaldo et al. 2018: fig. 52; Bonaldo 1994: figs 59, 68, 73, 77, 79, 80)................................................................................. 50</p><p>45(44). Posterior margin of anterior projections strongly procurved (Fig. 26B; Bonaldo 1994: fig. 52)....... E. saylapampa Bonaldo Posterior margin nearly straight (Fig. 27A–B; Bonaldo et al. 2018: fig. 7)..................... E. murgai Bonaldo &amp; Lise</p><p>46(44). Median field subtriangular, bulging between anterior projections (Fig. 2D–E; Bonaldo 1994: fig. 53).............. E. arnoi Median field otherwise (Fig. 7D–E; Bonaldo 1994: figs 21, 24, 46, 50).......................................... 47</p><p>47(46). Median field squared; anterior projections truncated (Fig. 7D–E; Bonaldo 1994: fig. 46)..................... E. tropicus Median field longer than wide; anterior projections rounded (Fig. 4D–E; Bonaldo 1994: figs 21, 24, 50)............... 48</p><p>48(47). Apex of anterior projections rugose, strongly sclerotized (Fig. 4D–E; Bonaldo 1994: fig. 50).............. E. valderramai Apex smooth (Bonaldo 1994: figs 21, 24)................................................................. 49</p><p>49(48). Median field plain anteriorly, with posterior longitudinal groove (Fig. 4A–B; Bonaldo 1994: fig. 24)............. E. silvae Median field concave anteriorly, without groove (Fig. 26A)............................................... E. ferox</p><p>50(43). Each posterior plate with posterior-lateral excavation (Bonaldo 1994: fig. 60)............................. E. furcifer Plates without excavations (Figs 14D–E, 11E–F; Bonaldo 1994: figs 68, 77, 79, 80)............................... 51</p><p>52(51). Median field as long as wide (Fig. 23A–B; Bonaldo 1994: fig. 68)....................................... E. ravidus Median field longer than wide (Fig. 23C–D; Bonaldo 1994: fig. 73).................................... E. itamaraju</p><p>53(51). Anterior projections not projected over posterior plates (Figs 11E–F, 7E–F; Bonaldo et al. 2018: fig. 52; Bonaldo 1994: fig. 80)................................................................................................ 54 Anterior projections projected over posterior plates (Bonaldo 1994: figs 77, 79)................................... 56</p><p>54(53). Median field wide, anterior margin gently curved (Peñaherrera-E et al. 2024: fig. 2C).... E. tendetza Peñaherrera et al., 2024 Median field narrow (Figs 11E–F, 7E–F, 14D; Bonaldo 1994: fig. 80)........................................... 55</p><p>55(54). Posterior plate subtriangular; stem of S2 elongated; S2 smaller (Figs 11E–F, 7E–F)......................... E. luisdiazi Posterior plate globose; stem of S2 short and robust; S2 larger (Fig. 12D–E; Bonaldo et al. 2018: fig. 52; Bonaldo 1994: fig. 80)....................................................................................... E. marquesae</p><p>56(53). Anterior projections gently tapering (Bonaldo 1994: fig. 77)............................................ E. luridus Anterior projections truncated (Bonaldo 1994: fig. 79).................................................. E. madre</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039187CA3936FFF46EB8FCC942EB973D	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Casas, Cristian M.;Villarreal-Blanco, Eduardo;Morales, Adriana;Osorio, Carlos;Martínez, Leonel	Casas, Cristian M., Villarreal-Blanco, Eduardo, Morales, Adriana, Osorio, Carlos, Martínez, Leonel (2025): Unveiling the diversity of Eutichurus Simon, 1897 (Araneae: Cheiracanthiidae) in Colombia: new species, records and comments on their distribution. Zootaxa 5691 (3): 399-448, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5691.3.2, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5691.3.2
039187CA3930FFF86EB8FA254377915B.text	039187CA3930FFF86EB8FA254377915B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Eutichurus arnoi Bonaldo 1994	<div><p>Eutichurus arnoi Bonaldo, 1994</p><p>Figs 2, 3, 29A, 30A, 32–33, 35</p><p>Eutichurus arnoi Bonaldo, 1994: 122, fig. 53.</p><p>Female holotype from Colombia, Magdalena, San Pedro, Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, XII.1974 - I.1975, C.W.D. Gibson &amp; R.J. Robins leg. (MCZ H5113); not examined.</p><p>Diagnosis. Males of Eutichurus arnoi Bonaldo, 1994 are similar to those of Eutichurus valderramai Bonaldo, 1994 by having a filiform and thin embolus without modification at the base and a large median apophysis, but they can be separated from this species by the shape of the retrolateral tibial apophysis, which is longer, apically pointed, with an anterior rounded projection, and ventrally projected (shorter, concave, and provided with a small projection along the full extension of its apical edge in E. valderramai; (Bonaldo 1994: 151, figs 48–49; Figs 2A–C, 3A–D). Females are similar to those of Eutichurus lizeri Bonaldo, 1994, Eutichurus yungas Bonaldo, 1994, E. murgai Bonaldo &amp; Lise, 2018, Eutichurus valderramai Bonaldo, 1994, and Eutichurus saylapampa Bonaldo,1994, by having highly developed anterior projection, not exceeding the posterior plates (Bonaldo 1994: 150, figs. 41–42; Bonaldo et al. 2018: 351, figs. 18–19; 327, figs. 7–8; Bonaldo 1994: 151, figs. 50–51; 151, fig. 52; Fig. 2D–E). However, they can be distinguished from E. lizeri and E. yungas by their unfused posterior plate (Bonaldo 1994: 150, figs. 41–42; Bonaldo et al. 2018: 351; Bonaldo 1994: 151, fig. 53; Fig. 2D–E); from E. murgai plate by their smooth anterior projection (distally sclerotized in E. murgai and E. valderramai) (Bonaldo et al. 2018: 327, figs. 7–8; Bonaldo 1994: 151, figs. 50–51; Fig. 2D–E); and from E. saylapampa and the aforementioned species, as well as from the rest of the genus, by having rounded posterior plates, as long as wide, and a prominent subtriangular atrium between the projection anterior (Bonaldo 1994: 151, fig. 52; 151, 53; Fig. 2D–E).</p><p>Description. Male (UARC:AR199). Coloration in ethanol: carapace dark brown on cephalic and ocular region with a thin and reddish-brown stripe on thoracic groove. Chelicerae with the paturon dark-brown, brown-reddish fangs. Endites and labium dark brown. Sternum light brown. Legs: coxae I–IV light brown. Femora and patellae I–IV light-brown-yellow; tibiae/tarsi II–IV brown. Opisthosoma: light gray, dorsally covered with fine white setae, ventrally with black setae around the tracheal spiracles and lung openings. Spinnerets light gray. Femora/tibiae I–IV with less developed scopulae. Tarsi I–IV with dense scopulae, and metatarsi III–IV with moderate scopulae. Measurements: total length 20.89, carapace length 9.44, width 7.22, height 4.05. Clypeus height 0.34. Eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.56, ALE 0.59, PME 0.38, PLE 0.52; AME–AME 1.50, AME–ALE 1.43, AME–PME 1.04, PME–PME 1.42, PME–PLE 1.70, ALE–PLE 1.12. Chelicerae length 5.38, with four promarginal and three retromarginal teeth. Sternum length 4.14, width 3.62. Legs: I—femur 8.37/ patella 3.41/ tibia 7.79/ metatarsus 9.35/ tarsus 3.53/ total 32.45; II—8.13/ 3.53/ 8.26/ 9.22/ 3.39/ 32.53; III—7.30/ 2.69/ 6.36/ 6.97/ 2.94/ 26.26; IV—8.95/ 3.51/ 8.01/ 9.53/ 3.01/ 33.01. Opisthosoma length 11.43. Legs and palp macrosetae pattern: palpal femur d 0-0-1, tibia p 1-0-1. I—femur d 1-0-1, p 0-0-1d; tibia v 2-(1)-2-1p; metatarsus v 2-1r- 1p. II—femur=I; tibia v 2-2-0, p 0-0-1d; metatarsus v 2-2- 1p. III—femur d 1-1-1r, p 0-1d-1d, r 0-0-1d; tibia v 1p-2-2, p 1-1, r 1-1; metatarsus v 2-1p-1p, d p1r1-p1r1-p1r1, p 0-0-1, r 0-0-1; IV=III. Palp: retrolateral tibial apophysis short, with a laminar small process; cymbium, long, nearly twice the length of the tibia; retrolateral process lightly projected; tegulum sub-rounded, longer than wide; hyaline conductor very thin; embolus long and filiform, inserted sub-basally on the tegulum, without process; spermatic ducts wide and n-shaped in ventral view; large and bifid median apophysis with sharpened and long apex, median prong with long and flattened apex (Figs 2A–C, 3A–D).</p><p>Female. See description and illustrations in Bonaldo (1994): 122, 151, fig. 53. Additional documentation in Fig. 2D–E.</p><p>New Records. COLOMBIA, Magdalena: 1♂, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-73.99552&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=10.890917" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -73.99552/lat 10.890917)">Parque Nacional Natural Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta</a>, Ciénaga (10°53′27.3″N; 73°59′43.9″W), 2100m, 11.VI.2001, P. Sánchez leg. (MPUJ _ ENT0087173); 2♂, Santa Marta, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-74.06278&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=11.1050005" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -74.06278/lat 11.1050005)">Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta</a>, Onaca, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-74.06278&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=11.1050005" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -74.06278/lat 11.1050005)">Camino Cerro Kennedy</a> (11°6′18″N; 74°3′46″W), 2388m, 15.XII.2022, Manual Capture, L. Martínez Leg. (UARC:AR199); 1♀, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-73.99961&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=10.895083" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -73.99961/lat 10.895083)">Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta</a>, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-73.99961&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=10.895083" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -73.99961/lat 10.895083)">Hacienda Hierba Buena</a> (10°53′42.3″N; 73°59′58.6″W), 2600m, 10.XI.2015, Manual Capture, L. Martínez Leg (UARC:AR205); 1♂, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-73.996056&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=10.893469" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -73.996056/lat 10.893469)">Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta</a>, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-73.996056&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=10.893469" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -73.996056/lat 10.893469)">Hacienda Hierba Buena</a> (10°53′36.49″N; 73°59′45.81″W), 2600m, 12.XI.2024, Manual Capture, L. Benavides, C. Casas. W. Galvis, C.V. Mamani, L. Martinez, M.P. Pereira, W. Porto, D. Proud (MPUJ _ ENT0087172).</p><p>Distribution. Only known from Magdalena department (Figs 32, 33, 35).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039187CA3930FFF86EB8FA254377915B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Casas, Cristian M.;Villarreal-Blanco, Eduardo;Morales, Adriana;Osorio, Carlos;Martínez, Leonel	Casas, Cristian M., Villarreal-Blanco, Eduardo, Morales, Adriana, Osorio, Carlos, Martínez, Leonel (2025): Unveiling the diversity of Eutichurus Simon, 1897 (Araneae: Cheiracanthiidae) in Colombia: new species, records and comments on their distribution. Zootaxa 5691 (3): 399-448, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5691.3.2, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5691.3.2
039187CA393CFFF86EB8FC1D43B294D1.text	039187CA393CFFF86EB8FC1D43B294D1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Eutichurus valderramai Bonaldo 1994	<div><p>Eutichurus valderramai Bonaldo, 1994</p><p>Figs 4, 31B, E, 32–33, 35</p><p>Eutichurus valderramai Bonaldo, 1994: 120, figs 48–51</p><p>( male holotype, Colombia, Valle de Medellín, Antioquia, lX– X.1962, B. Schneble leg., MCZ, examined ).</p><p>Diagnosis. Males of Eutichurus valderramai Bonaldo, 1994 resemble to those of Eutichurus andresgarcia sp. nov. and Eutichurus tropicus (L. Koch, 1866) in having a filiform embolus and a short, excavated retrolateral tibial apophysis (Bonaldo 1994: 120, figs 48–51; Figs 5A–C, 7A–C). They differ from the previous species by having a longer, slender, and sharp embolus, without a prolateral process; MA with the apMA and aMA much more developed, being larger, almost half the length of the cymbium (Fig. 4A–C). Females are similar to those of E. murgai Bonaldo &amp; Lise, 2018 by presenting anterior projections distally sclerotized (Bonaldo 1994: 150, figs. 41- 42; Bonaldo et al. 2018: 351, figs. 18-19; 327, figs. 7-8; Bonaldo 1994: 151, figs. 50-51; 151, 52). However, they can be distinguished by having the apex of the anterior projections rough and rounded (sharp in E. murgai), and by the posterior plates being square, as long as they are wide, with straight anterior margins (Fig. 4D–E) (with the posterior plates being longer than wide and with the anterior margins strongly divergent in E. murgai . Bonaldo &amp; Lise, 2018 (Bonaldo et al. 2018: figs. 7-8).</p><p>Description. See Bonaldo (1994: 120). Additional documentation in Figs 4, 31B, E.</p><p>New records. COLOMBIA, Antioquia: 1♂, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-75.333694&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=6.0889196" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -75.333694/lat 6.0889196)">Carmen del Viboral</a> (6°5′20.11″N; 75°20′1.3″W), 2150 m, 5.VI.2005, Captura manual, intradomicilio, L. Carmona leg. (CEUA 142102) ; Antioquia: 1♀, 1♂, same locality as the previous specimen (6°5′20.11″N; 75°20′1.3″W), manual capture, inside the house, L. Carmona leg. (CEUA 142103) .</p><p>Distribution. Known from Colombia, Antioquia and Nariño departments (Figs 32–33, 35).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039187CA393CFFF86EB8FC1D43B294D1	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Casas, Cristian M.;Villarreal-Blanco, Eduardo;Morales, Adriana;Osorio, Carlos;Martínez, Leonel	Casas, Cristian M., Villarreal-Blanco, Eduardo, Morales, Adriana, Osorio, Carlos, Martínez, Leonel (2025): Unveiling the diversity of Eutichurus Simon, 1897 (Araneae: Cheiracanthiidae) in Colombia: new species, records and comments on their distribution. Zootaxa 5691 (3): 399-448, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5691.3.2, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5691.3.2
039187CA393CFFFC6EB8F894427793CF.text	039187CA393CFFFC6EB8F894427793CF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Eutichurus andresgarcia Casas & Villarreal-Blanco & Morales & Osorio & Martínez 2025	<div><p>Eutichurus andresgarcia sp. nov.</p><p>Figs 5, 6, 29C, 30C, 32–33, 35</p><p>Type material. Holotype: COLOMBIA, Cundinamarca: 1♂, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-74.31395&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=4.61725" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -74.31395/lat 4.61725)">Reserva Chicaque</a>, Robledal (4°37′2.1″N, 74°18′50.22″W), 2250 m, 24–28.II.2014, D. Forero. Leg (MPUJ_ENT0086801).</p><p>Etymology. The specific epithet is a patronym in honor of the memory of Andrés García, a Colombian arachnologist and a great friend who made significant contributions to the study of Opiliones in the Neotropical region.</p><p>Diagnosis. Males of Eutichurus andresgarcia sp. nov. are similar to those of E. tropicus (L. Koch, 1866) by having a conspicuous embolar prolateral process with a filiform embolus and an excavated RTA (Bonaldo 1994: 150, figs 43–45; Figs 5A–C, 6A–C, 7A–C). They differ by the embolus inserted basally, a longer embolar prolateral process located basally in the embolus and the RTA with a distinctive stem inserted in oblique angle with to the tibia, while in E. tropicus it is perpendicular to the tibia and does not have a stem (Bonaldo 1994: 150, figs 43– 45; Figs 5A–C, 6A–C).</p><p>Description. Male holotype (MPUJ_ENT0086801). Coloration in ethanol: Carapace brown, blackish in ocular region and lighter in posterior region. Chelicerae with blackish brown paturon and fangs, with three promarginal and four retromarginal teeth. Endites and labium dark brown. Sternum brown. Legs: Coxae I-IV brown, I-II darker. Femurs, patellae, and tibiae I-IV brown. Metatarsals and tarsi I-IV brown, slightly darker than tibiae. Opisthosoma: Yellowish gray. Spinnerets yellowish gray. Metatarsus I-IV with poorly developed scopulae, located distally and spanning a small portion. Tarsi I-IV with dense scopulae. Measurements: total length 14.96, carapace length 6.96, width 5.18, height 2.37. Clypeus height 0.14. Eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.48, ALE 0.39, PME 0.32, PLE 0.39; AME–AME 1.16, AME–ALE 1.52, AME–PME 0.95, PME–PME 1.10, PME–PLE 1.37, ALE–PLE 0.65. Chelicerae length 4.85. Sternum length 2.98, width 2.62. Legs: I—femur 5.95/ patella 2.90/ tibia 5.96/ metatarsus 5.91/ tarsus 2.46/ total 23.18; II—5.94/ 2.82/ 5.53/ 5.56/ 2.41/ 22.26; III—5.35/ 2.59/ 4.65/ 4.44/ 1.83/ 19.04; IV—6.31/ 2.73/ 5.42/ 5.98/ 2.09/22.53. Opisthosoma length 7.44. Legs and palp macrosetae pattern: palpal femur d 0-1-1, tibia p 1-0-1. I—femur d 0-1, p 0-0-1d (left leg p 0-1-1); tibia v 0-2-0 (left leg v 0-1-1-2-0); metatarsus v 2-2-1. II=I, except left leg tibia v0-1-0. III—femur d 1-1-1, p 0-1d-1d, r 0-1d-1d; tibia v 0-2-2, p 0-0-1, r 1-0- 1; metatarsus v 2-2-1, p 1d-1d-2, r 1d-1d-2. IV—femur d 1-1-0, p0-1d-1d, r 0-0-1; tibia v1-1-2; metatarsus=III. Palp: cymbium longer than length of tibia; tegulum elliptical, longer than wide, conductor hyaline, oblanceolate, leaf-shaped; embolus basally broad, inserted sub basally on the tegulum, with long, tapering prolateral process, apex of embolus wavy, with a laminar zone extending for more than half its length; spermatic ducts broad, running marginally along tegulum; median apophysis scythe-shaped; retrolateral tibial apophysis cuboid in appearance (ventral view), truncate and excavated (Figs 5, 6).</p><p>Distribution. Only known from the type locality in Cundinamarca department (Figs 32–33, 35).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039187CA393CFFFC6EB8F894427793CF	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Casas, Cristian M.;Villarreal-Blanco, Eduardo;Morales, Adriana;Osorio, Carlos;Martínez, Leonel	Casas, Cristian M., Villarreal-Blanco, Eduardo, Morales, Adriana, Osorio, Carlos, Martínez, Leonel (2025): Unveiling the diversity of Eutichurus Simon, 1897 (Araneae: Cheiracanthiidae) in Colombia: new species, records and comments on their distribution. Zootaxa 5691 (3): 399-448, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5691.3.2, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5691.3.2
039187CA3938FFFC6EB8FE6943A0946F.text	039187CA3938FFFC6EB8FE6943A0946F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Eutichurus tropicus (L. Koch 1866)	<div><p>Eutichurus tropicus (L. Koch, 1866)</p><p>Figs 7, 29B, 30B, 32–34</p><p>Cheiracanthium tropicum L. Koch, 1866: 239, pl. 10, fig. 155 (sintypes, 2♀, Santa Fé de Bogotá, Cundinamarca, Colombia, BMNH, not examined).</p><p>Eutichurus tropicus; Bonaldo &amp; Brescovit 1992: 738 (Female transferred from Cheiracanthium). Bonaldo 1994: 119, figs 46–47; Bonaldo et al. 2018: 344 (synonymized with Eutichurus brescoviti) not examined.</p><p>Eutichurus brescoviti Bonaldo, 1994: 119, figs 43–45 (holotype, ♂, Cundinamarca, Colombia, MNRJ 263, not examined) not examined.</p><p>Diagnosis. Males of Eutichurus tropicus (L. Koch, 1866) resemble those of Eutichurus valderramai Bonaldo, 1994 and Eutichurus andresgarcia sp. nov. in having a filiform embolus and a short, excavated retrolateral tibial apophysis (Fig. 7A–C; Bonaldo 1994: figs 43–45, 48–49). Additionally, they closely resemble the latter species by having the embolus abruptly narrowing from the distal half. They differ thoseby having the embolus inserted almost basally and with a prolateral embolar process situated medially. They also resemble E muisca sp. nov. in having an excavated RTA and a median apophysis with apMA and aMA of nearly equal length, projecting similarly toward the basal and distal sides of the cymbium, respectively (Bonaldo 1994: 150, figs 43–45, 151, figs. 48–49; Figs 4A–C). However, they can be distinguished by having a wider, nearly square aMA with a longitudinal medial keel, a narrower, tapering aMA, and an RTA nearly perpendicular to the tibia respectively (Bonaldo 1994: 150, figs. 43–45, 151, figs. 48–49; Figs. 5A–C). Females see Bonaldo (1994: 119).</p><p>Description. See Bonaldo (1994: 119 – male under E. brescoviti). Additional documentation in Figs 7, 29B, 30B.</p><p>New records. COLOMBIA: Cundinamarca: 1♂, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-74.31395&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=4.61725" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -74.31395/lat 4.61725)">Reserva Forestal Chicaque</a>, Robledal (4°37′2.1″N; 74°18′50.22″W), 2250 m, 24–28.II.2014, D. Forero leg. (MPUJ_ENT00706) ; 1♂, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-74.374344&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=4.800664" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -74.374344/lat 4.800664)">Facatativá</a> (4°48′2.39″N; 74°22′27.63″W), 2580 m, 2.IV.1978, E. Quijano leg. (MPUJ_ENT0087095) ; Boyacá: 1♀, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-73.44218&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=5.699972" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -73.44218/lat 5.699972)">Santuario de Fauna y Flora Iguaque</a> (5°41′59.9″ N; 73°26′31.82″W), VII.2011, E. Castaño Leg. (MPUJ_ENT0087160) ; 1♀, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-73.44766&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=5.675372" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -73.44766/lat 5.675372)">Santuario de Fauna y Flora Iguaque</a> (5°40′31.34″ N; 73°26′51.59″W), 2850 m, IV.2003, manual capture. (MPUJ_ENT0070587) . Risaralda: 1 ♀, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-75.566666&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=4.7166667" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -75.566666/lat 4.7166667)">Santuario de Fauna y Flora Otúm Quimbaya</a>, El Molinillo (4°43′N; 75°34′W), 2220m, 17_04.II_ III.2003, manual capture, G. Lopez leg. (MPUJ_ENT0087161) .</p><p>Distribution. Known from Colombia, Cundinamarca and Boyacá departments (Figs 32–34).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039187CA3938FFFC6EB8FE6943A0946F	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Casas, Cristian M.;Villarreal-Blanco, Eduardo;Morales, Adriana;Osorio, Carlos;Martínez, Leonel	Casas, Cristian M., Villarreal-Blanco, Eduardo, Morales, Adriana, Osorio, Carlos, Martínez, Leonel (2025): Unveiling the diversity of Eutichurus Simon, 1897 (Araneae: Cheiracanthiidae) in Colombia: new species, records and comments on their distribution. Zootaxa 5691 (3): 399-448, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5691.3.2, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5691.3.2
039187CA3938FFE06EB8F9C943F093EB.text	039187CA3938FFE06EB8F9C943F093EB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Eutichurus muisca Casas & Villarreal-Blanco & Morales & Osorio & Martínez 2025	<div><p>Eutichurus muisca sp. nov.</p><p>Figs 8, 9, 29G, 30G, 32–34</p><p>Type material. Holotype: COLOMBIA, Boyacá: 1♂, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-73.5&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=5.6" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -73.5/lat 5.6)">Santuario de Fauna y Flora Iguaque</a>, Municipio Chízina. <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-73.5&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=5.6" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -73.5/lat 5.6)">Finca Sorcido</a> (5°36’N; 73°30’W), 2466 m, 2–22.IX.2003, P. Reina leg. (IAvH-I-3129).</p><p>Etymology. The specific name honors the indigenous community of the Muiscas, who inhabited several departments of the center of the country, including the department of Boyacá where this species is known to occur; noun in apposition.</p><p>Diagnosis. Males of Eutichurus muisca sp. nov. are similar to E. madre Bonaldo, 1998, E. nancyae Bonaldo &amp; Saturnino, 2018 and E. tequendama Bonaldo &amp; Lise, 2018 by having an embolar prolateral process and RTA represented by a single branch (Bonaldo et al. 2018: 333, figs 23–26; 343, figs 58–60; 332, figs 20–22; Figs 8A–C, 9A–C). However, they can be distinguished by a much more conspicuous, laminar, subtriangular prolateral embolar process directed prodistally (Figs 8A–B, 9A–B) They also resemble E. tropicus (L. Koch, 1866) by having an excavated RTA and a median apophysis with the apMA and aMA of almost the same length, similarly, projected towards the basal and distal sides of the cymbium, respectively (Bonaldo 1994: 150, figs 43– 45; Figs 9B–C, 10B– C). However, they can be differentiated by having a narrower apMA without a keel (wider, almost square, and with a longitudinal medial keel in E. tropicus), a wider aMA (narrow and sharp in E. tropicus), and an RTA perpendicular to the tibia (almost perpendicular to the tibia in E. tropicus . (Bonaldo 1994: 150, figs 43–45; Fig. 7A–C). Also, by the non-filiform embolus with a subdistally located lamellar prolateral process (filiform and with a medial lamellar prolateral process in E. tropicus . Bonaldo 1994: 150, figs 43– 45; Fig. 7A–C).</p><p>Description. Male holotype (IAvH-I-3129). Carapace ochre, reddish-brown in the cephalic region. Chelicerae with reddish-brown paturon and fang, with three promarginal and four retromarginal teeth. Endites brown, paler anteriorly, labium brown. Sternum pale brown. Legs: Coxae I-IV pale brown. Femora and patellae I-IV pale brown. Tibiae and tarsi II-IV brown. Opisthosoma: Light gray. Spinnerets light gray. Metatarsus I-IV with poorly developed scopulae. Tarsi I-IV with dense scopulae. Measurements: total length 12.99, carapace length 5.09, width 5.22, height 2.52. Clypeus height 0.38. Eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.33, ALE 0.27, PME 0.31, PLE 0.31; AME–AME 1.07,AME–ALE 1.10, AME–PME 0.96, PME–PME 1.08, PME–PLE 1.23,ALE–PLE 0.70. Chelicerae length 4.25. Sternum length 3.14, width 2.50. Legs: I—femur 5.77/ patella 2.71/ tibia 5.83/ metatarsus 5.74/ tarsus absent/ total 20.05; II—5.82/ 2.70/ 5.65/ 5.79/ 2.34/ 22.30; III—4.91/ 2.72/ 4.24/ 4.41/ 1.84/ 18.12; IV—6.72/ 2.08/ 5.18/ 6.07/ 2.16/22.21. Opisthosoma length 6.43. Legs and palp macrosetae pattern: palpal femur d 0-1-1, tibia p 1-0-1. I—femur d 1-0-1, p 0-0-1d; tibia v 0-2-0; metatarsus v 2-2-1. II=I, except femur d 0-1-1. III—femur d 1-0-1, p 0-0-1, r 0-1d-0; tibia v=I, p 1-0-1, r 0-0-1; metatarsus v 2-2-1, p 1d-1d-2, r 1d-1d-2. IV—femur d 1-1-0, p0-0-1d, p0-0-1d; tibia=III; metatarsus=III. Palp: cymbium longer than length of tibia; with sub-basal retrolateral process slightly projecting toward RTA; tegulum oval, longer than wide, conductor hyaline, petal-shaped, embolus prominent, inserted submedially on prolateral side of tegulum, hourglass-shaped (prolateral view), embolar prolateral process very conspicuous and laminar; spermatic ducts broad, running marginally along tegulum, J-shaped; median apophysis bifid, anvil-shaped (retrolateral view) and with rounded apex; retrolateral tibial apophysis broad, spoonshaped (ventral view), with a small process projecting ventrally toward tegulum (Figs 8A–C, 9A–C).</p><p>Distribution. Only known from the type locality in Boyacá department (Figs 32–34).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039187CA3938FFE06EB8F9C943F093EB	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Casas, Cristian M.;Villarreal-Blanco, Eduardo;Morales, Adriana;Osorio, Carlos;Martínez, Leonel	Casas, Cristian M., Villarreal-Blanco, Eduardo, Morales, Adriana, Osorio, Carlos, Martínez, Leonel (2025): Unveiling the diversity of Eutichurus Simon, 1897 (Araneae: Cheiracanthiidae) in Colombia: new species, records and comments on their distribution. Zootaxa 5691 (3): 399-448, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5691.3.2, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5691.3.2
039187CA3924FFE36EB8FE4D44019193.text	039187CA3924FFE36EB8FE4D44019193.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Eutichurus luisdiazi Casas & Villarreal-Blanco & Morales & Osorio & Martínez 2025	<div><p>Eutichurus luisdiazi sp. nov.</p><p>Figs 1, 10, 11, 29E, 30E, 32–34</p><p>Type material. Holotype: COLOMBIA, Guajira: 1♂, Barrancas, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-72.73379&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=10.874489" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -72.73379/lat 10.874489)">San Pedro del Alto</a>, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-72.73379&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=10.874489" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -72.73379/lat 10.874489)">Camino a la Cueva</a> (10°52′28.16″N; 72°44′1.64″W), 1716 m, 4.XII.2016, M. Gutiérrez leg. (MPUJ _ ENT0087171). Paratypes: COLOMBIA, Guajira: 2♀, same date as holotype (MPUJ _ ENT0087170, UARC:AR200); 2♂, same date as holotype (MPUJ _ ENT0087169, UARC:AR201); 2♂, Barrancas, San Pedro del Alto, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-72.6708&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=10.837333" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -72.6708/lat 10.837333)">Camino a la Cueva</a>, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-72.6708&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=10.837333" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -72.6708/lat 10.837333)">Finca La Alemania</a> (10°50′14.4″N; 72°40′14.9″W), 1749 m, 20.XI.2019, M. Gutiérrez leg. (MPUJ _ ENT0087168, UARC:AR202); 1♂, Barrancas, Vereda Las Pavas, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-72.67447&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=10.833638" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -72.67447/lat 10.833638)">Camino Cueva Jaguar</a> (10°50’01.1”N 72°40’28.1”W), 1671 m, 13.XI.2024, Manual capture, C. Casas, L. Martínez, M. Machado, M. Gutierrez, C. Osorio, E. Villarreal, L. Munar, Y. Murillo, L. Avendaño &amp; N. Aroca leg. (UARC:AR311); 1♂, 1J, Barrancas, Vereda Las Pavas, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-72.673416&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=10.840416" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -72.673416/lat 10.840416)">Finca La Fortuna</a> (10°50’25.5”N 72°40’24.3”W), 1539 m, 13.XI.2024, Manual capture, C. Casas, L. Martínez, M. Machado, M. Gutierrez, C. Osorio, E. Villarreal, L. Munar, Y. Murillo, L. Avendaño &amp; N. Aroca leg. (UARC:AR296)</p><p>Etymology. The specific name is after Luis Diaz, a young Colombian football player born at the type locality, municipality of Barrancas, and a pride for Colombia and specially his hometown for his professional career and the many social contribution through his foundation “Sembrando Esperanza” which focuses on improving the life quality of Barrancas and nearby populations. Masculine genitive epithet.</p><p>Diagnosis. Males of Eutichurus luisdiazi sp. nov. resemble to those of Eutichurus marquesae Bonaldo, 1994 by the long retrolateral tibial apophysis and large median apophysis, but differ by the very wide prolateral process of the embolus, retrolateral tibial apophysis straight with ventral tip less projected (very thin prolateral process of the embolus and wide retrolateral tibial apophysis with the ventral tip projected in E. marquesae (Bonaldo et al. 2018: 335, figs 27, 30; Figs 10A–C, 11A–D). Females are similar to those of Eutichurus marquesae by the anterior projections projected laterally in relation to posterior plates and the posterior plate much longer than wide (Bonaldo 1994: 154, fig 80; Figs 10E, 11E). They can be distinguished by the subtriangular posterior plate (bottle-like in E. marquesae), longer and thinner secondary spermathecae stalk, and smaller secondary spermathecae (Bonaldo 1994: 154, figs 80–81; Figs 10D–E, 11E–F).</p><p>Description. Male holotype (MPUJ_ENT0087171). Coloration in ethanol: carapace light-brown, darker on cephalic and ocular region with thin thoracic groove mark reddish brown. Chelicerae with the paturon dark brown and reddish-brown fangs with four promarginal and retromarginal teeth. Endites and labium dark brown. Sternum light brown. Legs: coxae I–IV yellow. Femora and patellae, I–IV light brown.Tibiae-tarsi, II–IV brown. Opisthosoma pale yellow, dorsally covered with fine white setae, ventrally with black setae rounded the tracheal spiracles and lungs opening. Spinnerets pale-yellow. Tarsi I–IV with dense scopulae, and metatarsi III–IV with scarce scopulae. Measurements: total length 15.07, carapace length 6.89, width 5.12, height 1.81. Clypeus height 0.22. Eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.41, ALE 0.40, PME 0.29, PLE 0.34; AME–AME 1.16, AME–ALE 1.26, AME–PME 0.85, PME–PME 1.25, PME–PLE 1.19, ALE–PLE 0.76. Chelicerae length 3.64. Sternum length 3.01, width 2.18. Legs: I—femur 5.87/ patella 2.12/ tibia 6.99/ metatarsus 5.18/ tarsus 2.65/ total 22.81; II—5.12/ 1.47/ 4.69/ 3.18/ 1.99/ 16.45; III—4.64/ 2.78/ 6.34/ 7.13/ 2.61/ 23.50; IV—5.57/ 2.13/ 5.86/ 5.16/ 2.52/ 16.08. Opisthosoma length 8.11. Legs and palp macrosetae pattern: palpal femur d 0-0-1, tibia p 1-0-1. I—femur d 1-0-0, p 0-1d-1d; tibia v 2-1r-1p-2 (2-3-2-1p); metatarsus v 2-0-2-1r (2r1-1p-1p). II—femur d 1-1-0, p 0-1d-1d; tibia v 2-2-1p; metatarsus v 2-1p- 1p. III—femur d 1-1-1, r 1d-1d-1d, p 0-1d-1d; tibia v 1p-2-2, p 1-1, r 1-1; metatarsus v 2-2-1p, d p1r1-p1r1- p1r1, p 0-0-1, r 0-0-1; IV—femur d=II, p=III, r 0-0-1d; tibia v 2-2-2, p 0-1, r=III; metatarsus=III. Palp: cymbium almost as long as tibia length; retrolateral process of the cymbium wide with the external edge sub-rounded; tegulum sub-rounded, almost as wide as long; conductor hyaline and thin; embolus long and flattened, inserted medially on the tegulum, with a wide process; spermatic ducts wide and S-shaped in ventral view; median apophysis large and bifid with long tips, median prong with apex rounded and sharp; retrolateral tibial apophysis large and thin with two apical processes, being the ventral longer than the dorsal (Figs 10A–C, 11A–D).</p><p>Female (MPUJ_ENT0087170). Coloration in ethanol:carapace light-brown darker on cephalic and ocular region with thin thoracic groove mark reddish-brown. Chelicerae with the paturon dark-brown and reddish-brown fangs with four promarginal and retromarginal teeth. Endites and labium dark brown. Sternum light brown. Legs: coxae I–IV yellow. Femora and patellae, I–IV light brown. Tibiae-tarsi, II –IV brown. Opisthosoma: pale yellow, dorsally covered with fine white setae, ventrally with black setae rounded the tracheal spiracles and lungs opening. Spinnerets pale-yellow. Tarsi I –IV with dense scopulae, and metatarsi III–IV with moderate scopulae. Measurements: total length 15.60, carapace length 8.04, width 5.91, height 2.18. Clypeus height 0.25. Eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.38, ALE 0.39, PME 0.26, PLE 0.26; AME – AME 1.22, AME – ALE 1.31, AME – PME 1.17, PME – PME 1.41, PME – PLE 1.59, ALE – PLE 0.83. Chelicerae length 4.10. Sternum length 3.21, width 2.87. Legs: I—femur 6.28/ patella 3.16/ tibia 6.40/ metatarsus 6.57/ tarsus 2.42/ total 24.83; II—5.87/ 3.15/ 6.13/ 6.21/ 2.53/ 23.89; III—4.50/ 2.36/ 3.84/ 4.45/ 2.30/ 17.45; IV—6.52/ 2.72/ 6.29/ 6.57/ 2.27/ 24.37. Opisthosoma length 7.50. Legs and palp macrosetae pattern: palpal femur d 0-0-1, tibia p 1-0-1. I—femur d 1-0-0, p 0-1d-1d; tibia v 2-1r-1p-2 (2-3-2-1p); metatarsus v 2-0-2-1r (2r1-1p-1p). II—femur d 1-1-0, p 0-1d-1d; tibia v 2-2-1p; metatarsus v 2-1p- 1p. III—femur d 1-1-1, p 0-1d-1d, r 1d-1d-1d; tibia v 1p-2-2, p 1-1, r 1-1; metatarsus v 2-2-1p, d p1r1-p1r1-p1r1, p 0-0-1, r 0- 0-1; IV—femur d=II, p=III, r 0-0-1d; tibia v 2-2-2, p 0-1, r=III; metatarsus=III. Epigynum: median field longer than wide, thinner towards the posterior side; anterior projections wide, subtriangular, apically rounded; posterior plates large, separated medially, and with a short basal groove, forming a triangle; primary spermathecae large and rounded; secondary spermathecae smaller than primary ones and rounded; stalk of secondary spermathecae long, wider towards the primary spermathecae; fertilization ducts short, nearly half the length of spermathecae diameter, anteriorly inserted on the primary spermathecae (Figs 10D–E, 11E–F).</p><p>Distribution. Known from Guajira department (Figs 32–34).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039187CA3924FFE36EB8FE4D44019193	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Casas, Cristian M.;Villarreal-Blanco, Eduardo;Morales, Adriana;Osorio, Carlos;Martínez, Leonel	Casas, Cristian M., Villarreal-Blanco, Eduardo, Morales, Adriana, Osorio, Carlos, Martínez, Leonel (2025): Unveiling the diversity of Eutichurus Simon, 1897 (Araneae: Cheiracanthiidae) in Colombia: new species, records and comments on their distribution. Zootaxa 5691 (3): 399-448, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5691.3.2, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5691.3.2
039187CA3927FFE56EB8FBA3427792D2.text	039187CA3927FFE56EB8FBA3427792D2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Eutichurus marquesae Bonaldo 1994	<div><p>Eutichurus marquesae Bonaldo, 1994</p><p>Figs 12, 29F, 30F, 32–33, 35</p><p>Eutichurus marquesae Bonaldo, 1994: 130, figs 80, 81</p><p>( female holotype, Colombia, Cundinamarca, Santa Fé de Bogotá, La Uvita, I.N. Maria leg., MNRJ 152, not examined );</p><p>Bonaldo et al. 2018: 334, figs 27–57 (male description).</p><p>Diagnosis. Males of E. marquesae Bonaldo, 1994 resemble those of E. paredesi Bonaldo &amp; Saturnino, 2018, E. madre Bonaldo, 1994 and E. luisdiazi sp. nov. by the MA with a long, retrolaterally directed median prong (Bonaldo 1994: 130, figs 80–81; Bonaldo et al. 2018: 333, figs 23–25; Fig. 12). but can be distinguished from E. paredesi Bonaldo &amp; Saturnino, 2018, E. madre Bonaldo, 1994 by the presence of a long embolar prolateral process inserted medially and from E. luisdiazi s p. nov. by the thinner prolateral process of the embolus and wide retrolateral tibial apophysis with the ventral tip projected (very wide prolateral process of the embolus, retrolateral tibial apophysis straight with ventral tip less projected in E. luisdiazi sp. nov.) (Bonaldo 1994: 130, figs 80–81; Bonaldo et al. 2018: 333, figs 23–25; Fig. 12). Females are similar to E. madre and E. luisdiazi sp. nov. by the epyginal posterior plate much longer than wide (Bonaldo 1994: 130:80; 129, figs 79; Figs 12D, 6D, 7E). They can be distinguished from E. luisdiazi sp. nov. by the bottle-like posterior plate (subtriangular in E. luisdiazi sp. nov.) and from E. madre by having anterior projections less developed not covering posterior plates (anterior projections well developed covering part of the anterior region of posterior plates in E. madre) (Bonaldo 1994: 130:80; 129, figs 79; Figs 12D, 10D, 11E).</p><p>Description. See Bonaldo (1994: 130) and Bonaldo et al. (2018: 334). Additional documentation in Figs 12, 29F, 30F.</p><p>New records COLOMBIA, Boyacá: 1♂, Ventaquemada (5°21′59.4″N; 73°31′3.75″W), 2630 m, 29.VII.2014, manual capture on grass, M. Cárdenas leg (ICN-Ar-9964); 1♂, El Cucuy, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-72.431755&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=6.420133" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -72.431755/lat 6.420133)">Vereda El Carrizal</a> (6°25′12.48″N; 72°25′54.33″W), 2850 m, 12.I.1999, manual capture, G. Mora leg. (MPUJ_ENT0087159) ; 1♀, (); 1♂, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-73.5&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=5.6" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -73.5/lat 5.6)">Santuario y Flora Iguaque</a>, Municipio Chízina, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-73.5&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=5.6" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -73.5/lat 5.6)">Finca Sorcido</a> (5°36’N; 73°30’W), 2466 m, 2–22.IX.2003, malaise, P. Reina leg. (IAvH-I-3127) ; 1♀, same locality and data of the previous specimen (IAvH-I-3128); Cundinamarca: 1♂, Soacha, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-74.23883&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=4.558631" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -74.23883/lat 4.558631)">Centro</a> (4°33′31.07″N; 74°14′19.81″W), 6.XI.2019, manual capturado en una bodega, I. Torres leg. (ICN-Ar-9952) .</p><p>Distribution. Known from Colombia, Cundinamarca and Boyacá departments (Figs 31–32, 34).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039187CA3927FFE56EB8FBA3427792D2	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Casas, Cristian M.;Villarreal-Blanco, Eduardo;Morales, Adriana;Osorio, Carlos;Martínez, Leonel	Casas, Cristian M., Villarreal-Blanco, Eduardo, Morales, Adriana, Osorio, Carlos, Martínez, Leonel (2025): Unveiling the diversity of Eutichurus Simon, 1897 (Araneae: Cheiracanthiidae) in Colombia: new species, records and comments on their distribution. Zootaxa 5691 (3): 399-448, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5691.3.2, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5691.3.2
039187CA3921FFE66EB8FE95431B9093.text	039187CA3921FFE66EB8FE95431B9093.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Eutichurus meta Casas & Villarreal-Blanco & Morales & Osorio & Martínez 2025	<div><p>Eutichurus meta sp. nov.</p><p>Figs 13, 14, 29D, 30D, 32–34</p><p>Type material. Holotype: COLOMBIA, Meta: 1♂, Puerto Gaitán, Altamira, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-72.08352&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=4.3019056" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -72.08352/lat 4.3019056)">Club Los Llaneros</a> (4°18′6.86″N; 72°5′0.66″W), 140 m, 14.X.2006, M. Bello et al. leg. (MPUJ _ ENT0070582).</p><p>Etymology. The specific name refers to the Meta Department in Colombia, where the type locality is situated; noun in apposition.</p><p>Diagnosis. Male of Eutichurus meta sp. nov. are similar to those of Eutichurus abiseo Bonaldo, 1994 in having a laminar, expanded embolus tip (Figs 13A–C, 14A–D; Bonaldo 1994: 149, figs 35–37; figs 13A–C, 14A–D). It differs from the previous species and from the other species of the genus in having a large and shovel-shaped retrolateral tibial apophysis, a well-developed and apically rounded process of the embolus with a prolateral notch on the apex, and a median apophysis with a very thin tip (Figs 13A–C, 14A–D).</p><p>Description. Male holotype (MPUJ_ENT0070582). Coloration in ethanol: carapace uniformly pale brown, darker on cephalic and ocular region, with thin, dark brown thoracic groove. Chelicerae with paturon light brown and fangs reddish brown. Endites and labium brown. Sternum pale brown. Legs: I–IV as carapace. Opisthosoma: light yellow, dorsally and ventrally covered with fine black setae, with a dense patch of black setae around the tracheal and lung spiracles. Spinnerets pale yellow. Tarsi I–IV with dense scopulae, and metatarsi III–IV with scarce scopulae. Measurements: total length 6.76, carapace length 2.79, width 2.56, height 1.45. Clypeus height 0.11. Eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.26, ALE 0.18, PME 0.20, PLE 0.20; AME–AME 0.63, AME– ALE 0.59, AME–PME 0.58, PME–PME 0.67, PME–PLE 0.48, ALE–PLE 0.42. Chelicerae length 1.47, with four promarginal and four retromarginal teeth. Sternum length 1.67, width 1.29. Legs: I—femur 4.31/ patella 1.38/ tibia 4.35/ metatarsus 4.90/ tarsus 1.61/ total 16.55; II—4.27/ 1.36/ 4.38/ 4.57/ 1.74/ 16.32; III—3.52/ 1.18/ 3.01/ 3.16/ 1.30/ 12.17; IV—4.46/ 1.29/ 3.78/ 5.17/ 1.42/ 16.42. Opisthosoma length 3.96. Legs and palp macrosetae pattern: palpal femur d 1-0-1, tibia p 1-0-1. I—femur d 1-0-1, p 0-1d-1d, r 0-1d-1d; tibia v 2-1-2-2 (2-2-2), p 1-0-1d (0-1d-0), r 0-1d-0; metatarsus v 2-2- 1p. II=I. III—femur d 1-0-1r, p 0-1d-1d, r 0-1d-1d; tibia v 1p-2-2, p 1-1, r 1-1; metatarsus v 2-1p-2, d p1r1-p1r1-p1r1, p 0-0-1, r 0-0-1; IV—femur=III, tibia v 1p-2-1p, p and r=III, metatarsus v 2-2-2, p and r=III. Palp: retrolateral tibial apophysis large and shovel-shaped; cymbium long, nearly twice the length of the tibia; retrolateral process of the cymbium slightly projected; tegulum sub-rounded, longer than wide; conductor hyaline, long, and thin; embolus long, flattened, and very wide; inserted sub-medially on the tegulum, apically flattened and bifid; spermatic ducts wide and S-shaped in ventral view; median apophysis small and thin, curved towards the posterior side of the bulb (Figs 13–14).</p><p>Distribution. Only known from the type locality in Meta department (Figs 32–34).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039187CA3921FFE66EB8FE95431B9093	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Casas, Cristian M.;Villarreal-Blanco, Eduardo;Morales, Adriana;Osorio, Carlos;Martínez, Leonel	Casas, Cristian M., Villarreal-Blanco, Eduardo, Morales, Adriana, Osorio, Carlos, Martínez, Leonel (2025): Unveiling the diversity of Eutichurus Simon, 1897 (Araneae: Cheiracanthiidae) in Colombia: new species, records and comments on their distribution. Zootaxa 5691 (3): 399-448, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5691.3.2, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5691.3.2
039187CA3923FFEA6EB8FF0043A1929B.text	039187CA3923FFEA6EB8FF0043A1929B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Eutichurus tibacuy Casas & Villarreal-Blanco & Morales & Osorio & Martínez 2025	<div><p>Eutichurus tibacuy sp. nov.</p><p>Figs 15, 16, 29H, 30H, 32–34</p><p>Type material. Holotype: COLOMBIA, Cundinamarca: 1♂, Tibacuy, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-74.49296&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=4.3255305" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -74.49296/lat 4.3255305)">Reserva Cerro Quininí</a>, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-74.49296&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=4.3255305" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -74.49296/lat 4.3255305)">Piedra de Los Partos</a> (4°19′31.91″ N; 74°29′34.67″W), 1760 m, 23.VII.2022, W. Galvis leg. (MPUJ_ENT0087167) Paratypes: COLOMBIA, Cundinamarca: 2 ♀, same locality as holotype, 23.VII.2022, W. Galvis leg (MPUJ_ENT0087165, UARC:AR203); 1♂, same locality as previous specimens, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-79.49296&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=4.3255305" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -79.49296/lat 4.3255305)">Reserva Cerro Quininí</a> (4º19’31.91”N; 79°29’34.67”W), 1640, 23.X.2015, Grupo de Artropofauna Universidad Nacional de Colombia leg. (ICN–Ar–13729) .</p><p>Etymology. The specific name refers to the type locality; noun in apposition.</p><p>Diagnosis. Males of Eutichurus tibacuy sp. nov. are similar to those of Eutichurus putus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1898 and Eutichurus sigillatus Chickering, 1937 by having a trifid retrolateral tibial apophysis (see Bonaldo 1994: 155, figs 84–86, 89–91; Fig. 16B–C). However, they can be distinguished by the shape of dorsal branch of the retrolateral tibial apophysis, which is very short, wide at the base, and straight; by the medial and ventral branches, which are shorter and less sharp; and by the embolus, which has a sharp and long prolateral tip (Figs 15A–C, 16AC). Females resemble those of Eutichurus sigillatus Chickering, 1937 and Eutichurus yariguies sp. nov. by having W-shaped anterior margins on the posterior plates and secondary spermathecae oval, well-developed, larger than the primary spermathecae (Bonaldo 1994: 155, figs 87–88; Figs 15D–E, 16E–F). They differ from the previous species by having broader anterior projections that extend obliquely and touch the anterior portion of the median field (smaller and very distally separated in Eutichurus yariguies sp. nov.). Also, the median field has a subtriangular median depression (absent in Eutichurus yariguies sp. nov. and with a protuberance in Eutichurus sigillatus; Figs 15D–E, 16E–F).</p><p>Description. Male holotype (MPUJ_ENT0087167). Coloration in ethanol: carapace uniformly light brown slightly darker on cephalic and ocular region with thin thoracic groove mark brown.Chelicerae with the paturon brown and fangs reddish brown. Endites and labium brown. Sternum light brown. Legs: I–IV as carapace. Opisthosoma: pale yellow, dorsally and ventrally covered with fine black setae, with a dense patch of black setae rounded the tracheal spiracles and lungs opening. Spinnerets pale-yellow. Tarsi I–IV with dense scopulae, and metatarsi III–IV with moderate scopulae. Measurements: total length 14.51, carapace length 6.69, width 4.96, height 1.68. Clypeus height 0.31. Eye diameters and interdistances:AME 0.48, ALE 0.57, PME 0.38, PLE 0.40; AME–AME 1.17, AME– ALE 1.08, AME–PME 0.94, PME–PME 1.25, PME–PLE 1.09, ALE–PLE 0.76. Chelicerae length 3.64, with four promarginal and retromarginal teeth. Sternum length 2.51, width 1.98. Legs: I—femur 8.24/ patella 2.76/ tibia 7.59/ metatarsus 8.92/ tarsus 3.35/ total 30.86; II—6.71/ 2.31/ 5.90/ 6.85/ 2.76/ 24.53; III—6.88/ 1.98/ 5.46/ 6.71/ 2.52/ 23.55; IV—lack. Opisthosoma length 7.76. Legs and palp macrosetae pattern: palpal femur d 1-0-1, tibia p 1-0-1. I—femur d 1-0-1, p 0-1d-1d, r 0-1d-1d; tibia v 2-2-2, p 0-0-1d; metatarsus v 2-0-2-1p, p 0-0-1d. II=I. III—femur d 0- 0-1, p 0-1d-1d, r 1d-1d-1d; tibia v=I, p 1-1, r 1-1; metatarsus v 2-2-1p, d p1r1-p1r1-p1r1, p 0-0-1, r 0-0-1; IV—lack. Palp: cymbium shorter than the tibia length; retrolateral process of the cymbium poorly developed; tegulum oval, longer than wide; conductor hyaline, thin; embolus long, flattened, inserted sub-medially on the tegulum, apically bifid; spermatic ducts wide, S-shaped in ventral view; median apophysis small and curved towards the proximal side of the bulb; trifid retrolateral tibial apophysis, with the dorsal branch being wider than the others, the medial branch longer and sharper, and the ventral branch smaller and thinner than the medial (Figs 15A–C, 16A–C).</p><p>Female (MPUJ_ENT0087165). Coloration in ethanol: Same as male. Chelicerae same as male. Measurements: Total length14.14,carapace length 5.97, width4.51,height 2.06Clypeus height0.08.Eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.32, ALE 0.28, PME 0.29, PLE 0.25; AME–AME 1.02, AME–ALE 1.10, AME–PME 0.80, PME–PME 1.22, PME–PLE 1.13, ALE–PLE 0.52. Chelicerae length 2.17. Sternum length 2.62, width 2.39. Legs: I—femur 5.00/ patella 2.14/ tibia 5.09/ metatarsus 5.01/ tarsus 1.76/ total 19; II—4.76/ 2.03/ 4.67/ 4.71/1.69/ 17.86; III—3.69/ 1.95/ 3.47/ 3.72/ 1.63/ 14.46; IV—4.78/ 2.17/ 4.47/ 5.07/ 4.76/21.35. Opisthosoma length 8.17. Legs and palp macrosetae pattern: palpal femur d 0-1-1, tibia p 0-1-1, metatarsus p 1-1-1. I—femur d 1-0-1, p 0-0-1; tibia v 1p-2-2; metatarsus v 2-1r- 1p. II—femur d=I, p 0-1-1; tibia v0-2-0; metatarsus v2-1p-1. III—femur d 1-0-1, p 0-1d-1d, r 1d-1d-1d; tibia v0-1p-0, p 1-0-1, r 0-0-1; metatarsus v 2-2-1, d p1r1-p1r1-p1r1, p 0-0-1, r 0-0-1; IV—femur d 1-0-1, p0-1d-1d, r 0-0-1; tibia v 1-2-1r, p 0-0-1; metatarsus IV=III. Epigyne: median field slightly wider than longer and rhomboid in shape, with a triangular depression; anterior projections broad, subtriangular, extending obliquely to touch the anterior portion of the median field; posterior plates fused and bulged, with a median suture; primary spermathecae small and rounded; secondary spermathecae oval, much larger than the primary spermathecae, spermathecae stalk broad, slightly thinner as they approach the primary spermathecae; fertilization ducts hardly longer than the diameter of the primary spermathecae and inserted anteriorly (Figs 15D–E, 16E–F).</p><p>Distribution. Only known from the type locality in Cundinamarca department (Figs 32–34).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039187CA3923FFEA6EB8FF0043A1929B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Casas, Cristian M.;Villarreal-Blanco, Eduardo;Morales, Adriana;Osorio, Carlos;Martínez, Leonel	Casas, Cristian M., Villarreal-Blanco, Eduardo, Morales, Adriana, Osorio, Carlos, Martínez, Leonel (2025): Unveiling the diversity of Eutichurus Simon, 1897 (Araneae: Cheiracanthiidae) in Colombia: new species, records and comments on their distribution. Zootaxa 5691 (3): 399-448, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5691.3.2, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5691.3.2
039187CA392EFFD06EB8FEAA460293B3.text	039187CA392EFFD06EB8FEAA460293B3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Eutichurus putus O. Pickard-Cambridge 1898	<div><p>Eutichurus putus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1898</p><p>Figs 17–22, 31C, F, 32–34</p><p>Eutichurus putus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1898: 237, pl. 34, fig.3</p><p>( female holotype, Veraguas, Panamá, Boucard leg. BMNH not examined)</p><p>; F. O. Pickard-Cambridge 1899: 86; Petrunkevitch 1911: 482; 1925: 75: Roewer 1954: 519; Bonnet 1956: 1846; Bonaldo 1994: 133, figs 89–93 (first male described; synonymized with E. ecuadorensis); Schmidt &amp; Osmani 2012: 20, fig. 5.</p><p>Eutichurus ecuadorensis Schmidt, 1971: 409, f. 14 (female holotype, Ecuador, SMF 25763 “mit bananen aus Ekuador in Hamburg ngeschl” not examined).</p><p>Diagnosis. Males of Eutichurus putus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1898 are similar to those of Eutichurus tibacuy sp. nov. and Eutichurus sigillatus Chickering, 1937 by having a trifid retrolateral tibial apophysis (Bonaldo 1994: figs 89–91, 84–86; Figs 15C, 16C, 17A, 18C, 23C). They can be distinguished by the broadened median apophysis and the bifid tip of the embolus (trifid in E. sigillatus and E. tibacuy sp. nov.), and by having the ventral and medial branches of the retrolateral tibial apophysis longer, more developed, and sharper, with the dorsal branch clearly separated from the medial branch (shorter ventral and medial branches, with dorsal branch closer to the medial branch in E. sigillatus and Eutichurus tibacuy sp. nov.) (Bonaldo 1994: figs 89–91, 84–86; Figs 15C, 16C, 17A, 18C, 19C, 20C, 21C, 22D). Females resemble E. sigillatus and E. manu by having small anterior projections, which do not surpass the anterior margin of the posterior plates, and by having posterior plates that are longer than wide (Bonaldo 1994: figs 92, 87, 82; Figs 18F, 20D). Additionally, they resemble the latter species by having a smooth atrium without a median protuberance (Bonaldo 1994: figs 92, 87, 82; Figs 18F, 23D). However, they differ from these species by having the anterior margin of the posterior plates straight (Fig. 17F) (W-shaped in E. sigillatus and slightly oblique relative to the posterior plates in E. manu), and the atrium subquadrate, almost as wide as long (hexagon-shaped in E. sigillatus and sub-rectangular, almost longer than wide (Bonaldo 1994: figs 92, 87, 82; Figs 17F, 23D). Furthermore, they exhibit SS2 that are not significantly different in thickness from the spermathecae, being almost the same thickness, and by having elongated secondary spermathecae, resembling a banana (Bonaldo 1994: fig. 93; Figs 23F, 20D).</p><p>Remarks. Eutichurus putus O. Pickard Cambridge, 1898 was established based on a female collected in Veraguas, Panama. The status of the species was based on this specimen, until Bonaldo (1994) included new additional material. One of these was a female previously described as E. ecuadorensis Schmidt, 1971, which, after examination of the type specimen, was considered as synonymous with E. putus . In addition, Bonaldo included 14 other specimens (12 of which were adult males) from Panama, Colombia, and Brazil: three males and two females from Barro Colorado, Panama; four males and two females from Estrada Chiva, Panama; one male from Cali, Colombia; two males from Maracá Island, Northern Brazil; one male from Rondônia, and one male from Mato Grosso do Sul (Bonaldo 1994). Bonaldo (1994) first described the male of E. putus from a specimen from Island Maracá, Brazil, and described a female from Barro Colorado, Panama. However, Maracá is very far from Veraguas, Panama (the type locality of the species), separated by a significant geographical barrier such as the tropical Andes (Fig. 28). Several differences were observed in the new material examined in this study. The specimens from Sucre, Colombia (Figs. 21–22) correspond to those from Barro Colorado, Panama (Fig. 17), while the specimens from Palmira, Colombia (Fig. 20) correspond to those from Cali (Fig. 18). These last two localities are very close to each other (department of Valle del Cauca, Colombia) (Fig. 28). Regarding the females, we present here a specimen from Palmira, Valle del Cauca (Fig. 25 A-E), which shows differences compared to the description of Bonaldo (1994) from Panama females, such as the anterior margins of the posterior plates slightly W-shaped (straight in the Panama specimens; Bonaldo 1994: 133, fig. 92; Fig. 22F). Since this female was collected with a male corresponding to those from Cali, Colombia, we believe that it may also be the female corresponding to that material. Based on the above, it is likely that the individuals identified as E. putus from Barro Colorado, Panama, and Cali, Colombia, represent two different entities or simply a notable variation of the same species. However, it is necessary to review the remaining material provided by Bonaldo (1994). Furthermore, it is crucial to include molecular tools based on DNA sequences, such as the COI gene, to make a more robust decision.</p><p>Description. See Bonaldo (1994: 133). Additional documentation in Figs 22–28, 31C, F.</p><p>New records. COLOMBIA, Valle del Cauca: 1♀, Tuluá, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-76.158165&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=4.0283084" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -76.158165/lat 4.0283084)">Jardín Botánico Juan María Céspedes</a> (4°1′41.91″N; 76°9′29.4″W), 1100 m, 24–31.VIII.1996, L. Baéz leg. (MPUJ_ENT0070943) ; 1♂, 1♀, Palmira, EL Pomo, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-76.168884&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=3.6233335" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -76.168884/lat 3.6233335)">Vereda Cerrito</a> (3°37′24″N; 76°10′8″W), 1882 m, 24.I.2023, L. Martínez leg. (MPUJ_ENT0087156, UARC:UA204) ; Sucre: 1♂, Colosó, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-75.35139&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=9.53" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -75.35139/lat 9.53)">Reserva Forestal Coraza</a> (9º31’48”N; 75°21’5”W), 339 m, 7.XI.2010, A. Pedroza &amp; J. García leg. (ICN–Ar –13727) ; Bolívar: 1♂, San Juan de Nepomuceno, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-75.09421&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=9.940778" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -75.09421/lat 9.940778)">Santuario de Fauna y Flora Los Colorados</a> (9°56’26.8”N; 75°5’39.14”W), 65 m, 24.X.2023, captura manual, J. Márquez leg (UARC: AR206) .</p><p>Additional material examined. PANAMÁ, Canal Zone: 1♂, 1♀, Barro Colorado Island, A.M. Chickering leg. (MCZ) . COLOMBIA, Valle del Cauca: 1♂, Cali, 1500m, 27.II.1973, night collecting, shrubs, trees, hills, W. Eberhard leg. (MCZ) . BRAZIL, Mato Grosso do Sul: 1♂, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-51.766666&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-12.816667" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -51.766666/lat -12.816667)">260km N</a> de Xavantina (12°49′S; 51°46′W), II-III.1969, X. Cachimbo leg. (MCZ). These specimens were originally identified by Bonaldo in 1992, subsequently cited in Bonaldo (1994: 134), and are confirmed here .</p><p>Distribution. known from Panama, Brazil and Colombia in the departments of Bolívar, Valle del Cauca and Sucre (Figs 32–34).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039187CA392EFFD06EB8FEAA460293B3	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Casas, Cristian M.;Villarreal-Blanco, Eduardo;Morales, Adriana;Osorio, Carlos;Martínez, Leonel	Casas, Cristian M., Villarreal-Blanco, Eduardo, Morales, Adriana, Osorio, Carlos, Martínez, Leonel (2025): Unveiling the diversity of Eutichurus Simon, 1897 (Araneae: Cheiracanthiidae) in Colombia: new species, records and comments on their distribution. Zootaxa 5691 (3): 399-448, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5691.3.2, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5691.3.2
039187CA3915FFD16EB8FF0045B091F9.text	039187CA3915FFD16EB8FF0045B091F9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Eutichurus sigillatus Chickering RTA 1937	<div><p>Eutichurus sigillatus Chickering, 1937</p><p>Figs 23, 32</p><p>Eutichurus sigillatus Chickering, 1937: 32, 33, figs 40, 69, 70</p><p>( Male holotype, Barro Colorado Island, Canal Zone, Panamá, 16.VI-15.VII.1934, MCZ B0072 );</p><p>Roewer, 1954; Bonnet, 1956: 1845; Bonaldo, 1994: 132, figs 84–88, 108.</p><p>Diagnosis. Males of Eutichurus sigillatus Chickering, 1937 are similar to those of Eutichurus putus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1898 and Eutichurus tibacuy sp. nov. by having a trifid retrolateral tibial apophysis (see Bonaldo 1994: 155, figs 84–86, 89–91; Fig. 15B–C, 16B–C). However, they can be distinguished from E. putus by the apex of median apophysis narrow and embolar apex trifid and from E. tibacuy sp. nov. by the RTA with all three branches pointed, prolateral branch of the embolus poorly developed and medial and retrolateral branches at approximately the same level (Bonaldo 1994: 155, figs 84–86, 89–91; Fig. 15B–C, 16B–C). Females are similar to those of E. tibacuy sp. nov., E. manu, E. yariguies sp. nov. and E. putus by the epigynal anterior projections small and the median field wider than long. However, they can be distinguished from E. manu and E. putus by the anterior margins of posterior plates W-shaped and from E. tibacuy sp. nov. and E. yariguies sp. nov. by having thinner anterior projections that do not extend to the anterior region of the median field and median field with a posterior median projection (with a subtriangular median depression in E. tibacuy sp. nov. and without modifications in E. yariguies sp. nov.)</p><p>Description. See Bonaldo (1994: 120). Additional documentation in Fig. 19.</p><p>Additional material examined. PANAMÁ, Canal Zone: 1♂, 1♀, Barro Colorado Island, A.M. Chickering leg. (MCZ). Originally identified by Bonaldo in 1992 and subsequently cited in Bonaldo (1994: 133) and confirmed here .</p><p>Distribution. Known from Panama (Fig. 32).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039187CA3915FFD16EB8FF0045B091F9	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Casas, Cristian M.;Villarreal-Blanco, Eduardo;Morales, Adriana;Osorio, Carlos;Martínez, Leonel	Casas, Cristian M., Villarreal-Blanco, Eduardo, Morales, Adriana, Osorio, Carlos, Martínez, Leonel (2025): Unveiling the diversity of Eutichurus Simon, 1897 (Araneae: Cheiracanthiidae) in Colombia: new species, records and comments on their distribution. Zootaxa 5691 (3): 399-448, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5691.3.2, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5691.3.2
039187CA3915FFD36EB8FC7B43D49578.text	039187CA3915FFD36EB8FC7B43D49578.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Eutichurus yariguies Casas & Villarreal-Blanco & Morales & Osorio & Martínez 2025	<div><p>Eutichurus yariguies sp. nov.</p><p>Figs 24, 32–33</p><p>Type material. Holotype: COLOMBIA, Santander: 1♀, Santander, Vereda Centro, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-73.38708&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=6.841581" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -73.38708/lat 6.841581)">Parque Nacional Natural Serranía de los Yariguíes San Vicente de Chucurí</a>, El Llanito (6°50′29.69″N; 73°23′13.49″W), 13–15. X. 2015, J. A. Osorio-González leg. (MPUJ_ENT0087164).</p><p>Etymology. The specific name refers to the type locality, which includes one of the Natural National Parks with higher diversity and endemism in the country; noun in apposition.</p><p>Diagnosis. Females of Eutichurus yariguies sp. nov. resemble to those of Eutichurus sigillatus Chickering, 1937, and Eutichurus tibacuy sp. nov. by having W-shaped anterior margins on the posterior plates and large oval secondary spermathecae, which are much larger than the primary ones (Bonaldo 1994: 155, figs. 87–88; Fig. 24). They differ by having the anterior margin of the posterior plate longer and convex (shorter in Eutichurus sigillatus and Eutichurus tibacuy sp. nov.), and in having the anterior projections rounded and wider (subtriangular in E. tibacuy sp. nov., rounded in E sigillatus, but less prominent. Bonaldo 1994: 155, figs 87–88) (Fig. 24).</p><p>Description. Female holotype (MPUJ_ENT0087164). Coloration in ethanol: carapace uniformly brown darker on cephalic and ocular region with thin thoracic groove mark dark brown. Chelicerae with the paturon light brown and reddish-brown fangs with four promarginal and four retromarginal teeth. Endites and labium dark brown. Sternum brown. Legs: I–IV light brown. Opisthosoma: cream, dorsally and ventrally covered with fine black setae, with a dense patch of black setae rounded the tracheal spiracles and lungs opening. Pale yellow spinnerets. Tarsi I–IV with dense scopulae, and metatarsi III-IV with moderate scopulae. Measurements: total length 12.56, carapace length 7.03, width 5.27, height 1.49. Clypeus height 0.32. Eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.55, ALE 0.44, PME 0.35, PLE 0.43; AME–AME 1.42, AME–ALE 1.64, AME–PME 1.21, PME–PME 1.61, PME–PLE 1.55, ALE–PLE 0.98. Chelicerae length 4.60. Sternum length 3.92, width 3.01. Legs: I—femur 6.26/ patella 3.29/ tibia 6.40/ metatarsus 6.30/ tarsus 2.54/ total 24.79; II—6.24/ 3.36/ 6.23/ 5.71/ 2.7/ 24.24; III—5.31/ 2.98/ 4.42/ 4.67/ 1.94/ 19.32; IV—6.52/ 2.90/ 5.93/ 6.43/ 2.69/ 24.47. Opisthosoma length 5.53. Legs and palp macrosetae pattern: palpal femur d 1-0-1, tibia p 1-0-1. I—femur d 1-0-1, p 0-1d-1d, r 0-1d-1d; tibia v 2-1-2-2 (2-2-2), p 1-0-1d (0-1d-0), r 0-1d-0; metatarsus v 2-2- 1p. II=I. III—femur d 1-0-1r, p 0-1d-1d, r 0-1d-1d; tibia v 1p-2-2, p 1-1, r 1-1; metatarsus v 2-1p-2, d p1r1-p1r1-p1r1, p 0-0-1, r 0-0-1; IV—femur=III, tibia v 1p-2-1p, p and r=III, metatarsus v 2-2-2, p and r=III. Epigynum: median field wider than longer and rhomboidal; anterior projections very wide, subtriangular, and strongly sclerotized on the apical side; posterior plates large, very wide, and anteriorly rounded and convex; primary spermathecae small and rounded; secondary spermathecae larger than primary ones, heavily bulging, and sub-rounded; stalk of secondary spermathecae long and wide, thinner towards the primary spermathecae; fertilization ducts almost as long as primary spermathecae length and anteriorly inserted on the prolateral side of the primary spermathecae (Fig. 24A–D).</p><p>Distribution. Only known from the type locality in Santander department (Figs 32–33).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039187CA3915FFD36EB8FC7B43D49578	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Casas, Cristian M.;Villarreal-Blanco, Eduardo;Morales, Adriana;Osorio, Carlos;Martínez, Leonel	Casas, Cristian M., Villarreal-Blanco, Eduardo, Morales, Adriana, Osorio, Carlos, Martínez, Leonel (2025): Unveiling the diversity of Eutichurus Simon, 1897 (Araneae: Cheiracanthiidae) in Colombia: new species, records and comments on their distribution. Zootaxa 5691 (3): 399-448, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5691.3.2, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5691.3.2
039187CA3910FFD46EB8FF0043689014.text	039187CA3910FFD46EB8FF0043689014.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Eutichurus cumbia Bonaldo & Ramirez 2018	<div><p>Eutichurus cumbia Bonaldo &amp; Ramírez, 2018</p><p>Figs 25, 31A, D, 32–33, 35</p><p>Eutichurus cumbia Bonaldo &amp; Ramírez, in Bonaldo et al., 2018: 329, figs 12–14 (male holotype, Colombia, without specific locality, Ovalle leg. Poorly preserved material, dehydrated, without Opisthosoma and broken legs (Bonaldo et al. 2018) (AMNH, examined).</p><p>Diagnosis. See Bonaldo et al. 2018: 329.</p><p>Description. See Bonaldo et al. (2018: 329). Additional documentation in Figs 25, 31A, D.</p><p>New records. COLOMBIA, Cundinamarca: 1♂, Tabio, Vereda Salitre Alto, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-74.100006&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=4.9333334" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -74.100006/lat 4.9333334)">Reserva Carmen de los Juncales</a> (4°56′00″N; 74°05′60″W), 2783 m, 30.IX.2015, captura manual, J. Carrillo leg. (MPUJ_ENT0087155) ; 1♂, same locality as the previous specimen, 1.XI.2015, manual capture, Eucalyptus forest, C. Mora leg. (MPUJ_ ENT0087154) .</p><p>Distribution. Only known from Colombia, Cundinamarca (Figs 32–33, 35).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039187CA3910FFD46EB8FF0043689014	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Casas, Cristian M.;Villarreal-Blanco, Eduardo;Morales, Adriana;Osorio, Carlos;Martínez, Leonel	Casas, Cristian M., Villarreal-Blanco, Eduardo, Morales, Adriana, Osorio, Carlos, Martínez, Leonel (2025): Unveiling the diversity of Eutichurus Simon, 1897 (Araneae: Cheiracanthiidae) in Colombia: new species, records and comments on their distribution. Zootaxa 5691 (3): 399-448, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5691.3.2, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5691.3.2
039187CA3911FFD56EB8FF0044D5904F.text	039187CA3911FFD56EB8FF0044D5904F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Eutichurus furcifer Kraus Retrolateral 1955	<div><p>Eutichurus furcifer Kraus, 1955</p><p>Figs 26–27, 32</p><p>Eutichurus furcifer Kraus, 1955: 43, figs. 105-107,</p><p>( male holotype, Vulcan San Vicente, Finca El Carmen, 1300 m, El Salvador, 30.VII.1952, Schuster col., SMF 8667 );</p><p>Brignoli, 1983: 542; Bonaldo, 1994: 123, figs 56–61, 108 (first female described).</p><p>Diagnosis. See Bonaldo, 1994: 123.</p><p>Description. See Bonaldo (1994: 120). Additional documentation in Figs 20, 21.</p><p>Additional material examined. COSTA RICA, San José: 1♂, 1♀, San Antonio de Escazu, 1300m, II-1981, W. Eberhard leg. (MCZ). Cited by Bonaldo (1994: 124) .</p><p>Distribution. Known from El Salvador and Costa Rica (Fig. 32).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039187CA3911FFD56EB8FF0044D5904F	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Casas, Cristian M.;Villarreal-Blanco, Eduardo;Morales, Adriana;Osorio, Carlos;Martínez, Leonel	Casas, Cristian M., Villarreal-Blanco, Eduardo, Morales, Adriana, Osorio, Carlos, Martínez, Leonel (2025): Unveiling the diversity of Eutichurus Simon, 1897 (Araneae: Cheiracanthiidae) in Colombia: new species, records and comments on their distribution. Zootaxa 5691 (3): 399-448, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5691.3.2, URL: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5691.3.2
