taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
039E878EFF979231FCACFEB8FF7CFE2B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8257943/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8257943	Fig. 1. Two-dimensional diagram for principal coordinate analysis in C. annuum genotypes using ISSR markers. G1, G2, G3, G4 and G5: Genotype grouping. The results of PCA (Principal Coordinate Analysis) were largely consistent with those of ISSR markers. The studied genotypes were divided into five groups. There was no significant relationship between resistant and molecular markers in the present study (r = 0.020ns).	Fig. 1. Two-dimensional diagram for principal coordinate analysis in C. annuum genotypes using ISSR markers. G1, G2, G3, G4 and G5: Genotype grouping. The results of PCA (Principal Coordinate Analysis) were largely consistent with those of ISSR markers. The studied genotypes were divided into five groups. There was no significant relationship between resistant and molecular markers in the present study (r = 0.020ns).	2021-10-31	Mohammadbagheri, Leila;Nasr-Esfahani, Mehdi;Abdossi, Vahid;Naderi, Davood		Zenodo	biologists	Mohammadbagheri, Leila;Nasr-Esfahani, Mehdi;Abdossi, Vahid;Naderi, Davood			
039E878EFF979231FCACFEB8FF7CFE2B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8257945/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8257945	Fig. 2. Three-dimensional analysis of the principal components derived from polymorphism pattern of 37 resistant and susceptible C. annuum genotypes to Phytophthora capsici by ISSR markers using NTSYS software, UPGMA algorithm and Jaccard similarity coefficient.	Fig. 2. Three-dimensional analysis of the principal components derived from polymorphism pattern of 37 resistant and susceptible C. annuum genotypes to Phytophthora capsici by ISSR markers using NTSYS software, UPGMA algorithm and Jaccard similarity coefficient.	2021-10-31	Mohammadbagheri, Leila;Nasr-Esfahani, Mehdi;Abdossi, Vahid;Naderi, Davood		Zenodo	biologists	Mohammadbagheri, Leila;Nasr-Esfahani, Mehdi;Abdossi, Vahid;Naderi, Davood			
039E878EFF979231FCACFEB8FF7CFE2B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8257947/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8257947	Fig. 3. Activity of Peroxidase or Peroxide reductases (POX), (POX)(A), Superoxide dismutase (SOD) (B), Polyphenol oxidase (PPO) (C), Catalase (CAT) (D), Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) (E), Glucanase (F) and Phenol contents (G) in inoculated resistant and susceptible pepper genotypes in comparison to controls, non-inoculated ones to damping-off disease, Phytophthora capcisi.	Fig. 3. Activity of Peroxidase or Peroxide reductases (POX), (POX)(A), Superoxide dismutase (SOD) (B), Polyphenol oxidase (PPO) (C), Catalase (CAT) (D), Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) (E), Glucanase (F) and Phenol contents (G) in inoculated resistant and susceptible pepper genotypes in comparison to controls, non-inoculated ones to damping-off disease, Phytophthora capcisi.	2021-10-31	Mohammadbagheri, Leila;Nasr-Esfahani, Mehdi;Abdossi, Vahid;Naderi, Davood		Zenodo	biologists	Mohammadbagheri, Leila;Nasr-Esfahani, Mehdi;Abdossi, Vahid;Naderi, Davood			
