taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
03A41A24A77D011939B4FD8EFA36558E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5436992/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5436992	Figure 3. Posterior lateral spinneret spigot types for select rastelloid taxa (scale bars = 0.1 mm). A, Kiama lachrymoides. B, Cyrtauchenius luridus Simon, 1881. C, Promyrmekiaphila gertschi. D, Acontius sp. E, Eucteniza rex. F, Neoapachella rothi. G, Rhytidicolus sp. H, Myrmekiaphila torreya. I, Ummidia sp.	Figure 3. Posterior lateral spinneret spigot types for select rastelloid taxa (scale bars = 0.1 mm). A, Kiama lachrymoides. B, Cyrtauchenius luridus Simon, 1881. C, Promyrmekiaphila gertschi. D, Acontius sp. E, Eucteniza rex. F, Neoapachella rothi. G, Rhytidicolus sp. H, Myrmekiaphila torreya. I, Ummidia sp.	2002-11-30	Bond, Jason E.;Opell, Brent D.		Zenodo	biologists	Bond, Jason E.;Opell, Brent D.			
03A41A24A77D011939B4FD8EFA36558E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5436996/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5436996	Figure 4. Silk spigots on apicalmost article of posterior lateral spinnerets for select euctenizine taxa (scale bars = 0.1 mm). A, Aptostichus hesperus. B, Neoapachella rothi. C, Entychides arizonica. D, Eucteniza rex.	Figure 4. Silk spigots on apicalmost article of posterior lateral spinnerets for select euctenizine taxa (scale bars = 0.1 mm). A, Aptostichus hesperus. B, Neoapachella rothi. C, Entychides arizonica. D, Eucteniza rex.	2002-11-30	Bond, Jason E.;Opell, Brent D.		Zenodo	biologists	Bond, Jason E.;Opell, Brent D.			
03A41A24A77D011939B4FD8EFA36558E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5437006/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5437006	Figure 7. Colour photographs of live Euctenizinae species. A, Eucteniza rex from Laredo, Texas. B, Aptostichus atomarius from Riverside County, California. C, Promyrmekiaphila gertschi from San Mateo County, California.	Figure 7. Colour photographs of live Euctenizinae species. A, Eucteniza rex from Laredo, Texas. B, Aptostichus atomarius from Riverside County, California. C, Promyrmekiaphila gertschi from San Mateo County, California.	2002-11-30	Bond, Jason E.;Opell, Brent D.		Zenodo	biologists	Bond, Jason E.;Opell, Brent D.			
03A41A24A77D011939B4FD8EFA36558E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5437008/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5437008	Figure 8. Eucteniza rex Chamberlin male holotype (A–D) and female paratypes (E). A, retrolateral aspect of leg I. B, prolateral aspect of leg I. C, retrolateral aspect of leg II. D, retrolateral aspect of pedipalp. E, spermathecal receptula.	Figure 8. Eucteniza rex Chamberlin male holotype (A–D) and female paratypes (E). A, retrolateral aspect of leg I. B, prolateral aspect of leg I. C, retrolateral aspect of leg II. D, retrolateral aspect of pedipalp. E, spermathecal receptula.	2002-11-30	Bond, Jason E.;Opell, Brent D.		Zenodo	biologists	Bond, Jason E.;Opell, Brent D.			
03A41A24A77D011939B4FD8EFA36558E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5437012/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5437012	Figure 9. Eucteniza rex burrow from Laredo, Texas excavated by W. Icenogle and bisected. A, lateral view with trapdoor open. B, top view with trapdoor closed.	Figure 9. Eucteniza rex burrow from Laredo, Texas excavated by W. Icenogle and bisected. A, lateral view with trapdoor open. B, top view with trapdoor closed.	2002-11-30	Bond, Jason E.;Opell, Brent D.		Zenodo	biologists	Bond, Jason E.;Opell, Brent D.			
03A41A24A77D011939B4FD8EFA36558E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5437018/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5437018	Figure 10. North American known locality map for Neoapachella, Entychides, and Eucteniza.	Figure 10. North American known locality map for Neoapachella, Entychides, and Eucteniza.	2002-11-30	Bond, Jason E.;Opell, Brent D.		Zenodo	biologists	Bond, Jason E.;Opell, Brent D.			
03A41A24A77D011939B4FD8EFA36558E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5437026/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5437026	Figure 13. Aptostichus atomarius from Los Angeles County, California, Chatsworth in CAS (A–D) and Aptostichus simus, male from Los Angeles County, California, Playa del Rey State Beach and female from the type locality San Diego County, Silverstrand State Beach (E–I). A, male leg I, retrolateral aspect. B, spermathecal receptula. C, cymbium and palpal bulb, retrolateral aspect. D, abdomen. E, male leg I, retrolateral aspect. F, male leg I, prolateral aspect. G, pedipalp, retrolateral aspect. H, spermathecal receptula. I, sternum and palpal endites.	Figure 13. Aptostichus atomarius from Los Angeles County, California, Chatsworth in CAS (A–D) and Aptostichus simus, male from Los Angeles County, California, Playa del Rey State Beach and female from the type locality San Diego County, Silverstrand State Beach (E–I). A, male leg I, retrolateral aspect. B, spermathecal receptula. C, cymbium and palpal bulb, retrolateral aspect. D, abdomen. E, male leg I, retrolateral aspect. F, male leg I, prolateral aspect. G, pedipalp, retrolateral aspect. H, spermathecal receptula. I, sternum and palpal endites.	2002-11-30	Bond, Jason E.;Opell, Brent D.		Zenodo	biologists	Bond, Jason E.;Opell, Brent D.			
03A41A24A77D011939B4FD8EFA36558E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5437022/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5437022	Figure 12. Entychides arizonica from Cochise County, Arizona, 5 miles south-west of Portal (SWRS) in AMNH. A, male leg I, retrolateral aspect. B, spermathecal receptula.	Figure 12. Entychides arizonica from Cochise County, Arizona, 5 miles south-west of Portal (SWRS) in AMNH. A, male leg I, retrolateral aspect. B, spermathecal receptula.	2002-11-30	Bond, Jason E.;Opell, Brent D.		Zenodo	biologists	Bond, Jason E.;Opell, Brent D.			
03A41A24A77D011939B4FD8EFA36558E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5437036/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5437036	Figure 15. Promyrmekiaphila gertschi from Ben Lomond, Santa Cruz County, California. A, pedipalp, retrolateral aspect. B, male leg I, retrolateral aspect. C, spermathecal receptula.	Figure 15. Promyrmekiaphila gertschi from Ben Lomond, Santa Cruz County, California. A, pedipalp, retrolateral aspect. B, male leg I, retrolateral aspect. C, spermathecal receptula.	2002-11-30	Bond, Jason E.;Opell, Brent D.		Zenodo	biologists	Bond, Jason E.;Opell, Brent D.			
03A41A24A77D011939B4FD8EFA36558E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5437040/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5437040	Figure 17. Apomastus schlingeri sp. nov. HOLOTYPE (A–C) and female paratype (D). A, pedipalp, retrolateral aspect. B, leg I, retrolateral aspect. C, leg I, prolateral aspect. D, spermathecal receptula.	Figure 17. Apomastus schlingeri sp. nov. HOLOTYPE (A–C) and female paratype (D). A, pedipalp, retrolateral aspect. B, leg I, retrolateral aspect. C, leg I, prolateral aspect. D, spermathecal receptula.	2002-11-30	Bond, Jason E.;Opell, Brent D.		Zenodo	biologists	Bond, Jason E.;Opell, Brent D.			
03A41A24A77D011939B4FD8EFA36558E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5437020/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5437020	Figure 11. Neoapachella rothi sp. nov. male HOLOTYPE (A–C) female paratype (D). A, leg I, retrolateral aspect. B, leg I, prolateral aspect. C, pedipalp, retrolateral aspect. D, spermathecal receptula.	Figure 11. Neoapachella rothi sp. nov. male HOLOTYPE (A–C) female paratype (D). A, leg I, retrolateral aspect. B, leg I, prolateral aspect. C, pedipalp, retrolateral aspect. D, spermathecal receptula.	2002-11-30	Bond, Jason E.;Opell, Brent D.		Zenodo	biologists	Bond, Jason E.;Opell, Brent D.			
03A41A24A77D011939B4FD8EFA36558E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5436990/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5436990	Figure 2. Reanalysis of Goloboff’s (1993) data set of 71 morphological characters scored for 42 mygalomorph taxa using implied weights (k = 7; note that the topology is quite sensitive to concavity function constant). This is a strict consensus of 27 most parsimonious trees (236 steps, CI = 0.39, RI = 0.73). Filled circles indicate nodes that differ from Goloboff ’s original analysis, cyrtaucheniid taxa are in grey shaded box. A summary and a brief explanation of the characters and their scorings are presented in Appendix 1.	Figure 2. Reanalysis of Goloboff’s (1993) data set of 71 morphological characters scored for 42 mygalomorph taxa using implied weights (k = 7; note that the topology is quite sensitive to concavity function constant). This is a strict consensus of 27 most parsimonious trees (236 steps, CI = 0.39, RI = 0.73). Filled circles indicate nodes that differ from Goloboff ’s original analysis, cyrtaucheniid taxa are in grey shaded box. A summary and a brief explanation of the characters and their scorings are presented in Appendix 1.	2002-11-30	Bond, Jason E.;Opell, Brent D.		Zenodo	biologists	Bond, Jason E.;Opell, Brent D.			
03A41A24A77D011939B4FD8EFA36558E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5437032/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5437032	Figure 14. Aptostichus sp. burrow from Riverside County, Winchester, California. A, burrow closed with arrow indicating its location. B, same burrow opened.	Figure 14. Aptostichus sp. burrow from Riverside County, Winchester, California. A, burrow closed with arrow indicating its location. B, same burrow opened.	2002-11-30	Bond, Jason E.;Opell, Brent D.		Zenodo	biologists	Bond, Jason E.;Opell, Brent D.			
03A41A24A77D011939B4FD8EFA36558E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5437044/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5437044	Figure 18. Apomastus sp. burrow opening, from Orange County, California.	Figure 18. Apomastus sp. burrow opening, from Orange County, California.	2002-11-30	Bond, Jason E.;Opell, Brent D.		Zenodo	biologists	Bond, Jason E.;Opell, Brent D.			
03A41A24A74D011739E7FC91FE395407.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5437040/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5437040	Figure 17. Apomastus schlingeri sp. nov. HOLOTYPE (A–C) and female paratype (D). A, pedipalp, retrolateral aspect. B, leg I, retrolateral aspect. C, leg I, prolateral aspect. D, spermathecal receptula.	Figure 17. Apomastus schlingeri sp. nov. HOLOTYPE (A–C) and female paratype (D). A, pedipalp, retrolateral aspect. B, leg I, retrolateral aspect. C, leg I, prolateral aspect. D, spermathecal receptula.	2002-11-30	Bond, Jason E.;Opell, Brent D.		Zenodo	biologists	Bond, Jason E.;Opell, Brent D.			
