identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
03A3CC011B10BC69FCCBFAD6F703F919.text	03A3CC011B10BC69FCCBFAD6F703F919.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Corymbophanes kaiei Armbruster & Sabaj 2000	<div><p>Corymbophanes kaiei</p><p>GUYANA, Region 8 (Potaro–Siparuni), Potaro River– Essequibo River drainage: AUM 28163, 2, paratypes, 48.3, 48.5 mm SL, plus 1 cleared and stained, CSBD F644, holotype, 65.6 mm SL, INHS 48583, 2, 26.2, 70.0 mm SL and FMNH 108246, 1, 47.6 mm SL, Oung Creek, tributary of Chenapou River, about one hour hike SW of coordinates 04.97389°, -059.57806° (mouth of Chenapou River); AUM 62908, 1, not measured, Potaro River at Ayanganna Old, 05.30181°, -059.89838°; and ROM 89928, 2, 49.0, 108.9 mm SL, Kopinang River at Kopinang Village landing, schoolhouse rapids, 04.9407°, -059.85882 °.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A3CC011B10BC69FCCBFAD6F703F919	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Lujan, Nathan K.;Armbruster, Jonathan W.;Werneke, David C.;Teixeira, Túlio Franco;Lovejoy, Nathan R.	Lujan, Nathan K., Armbruster, Jonathan W., Werneke, David C., Teixeira, Túlio Franco, Lovejoy, Nathan R. (2020): Phylogeny and biogeography of the Brazilian-Guiana Shield endemic Corymbophanes clade of armoured catfishes (Loricariidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 188: 1213-1235
03A3CC011B10BC6CFCCBF977F721FB5A.text	03A3CC011B10BC6CFCCBF977F721FB5A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Corymbophanes andersoni	<div><p>Corymbophanes andersoni</p><p>GUYANA, Region 8 (Potaro–Siparuni), Potaro River– Essequibo River drainage: FMNH 52675, holotype , 65.5 mm SL, Aruataima Falls, Upper Potaro; AUM 28149, 3, 25.6 –57.0 mm SL, plus 1 cleared and stained, INHS 49586, 2, 17.3, 64.9 mm SL, topotypes ,</p><p>Aruataima (Chenapou) Falls, 23.7 km southwest of Menzies Landing, 05.00139°, -059.62583°.</p><p>PHYLOGENETIC TAXON SAMPLING</p><p>In addition to both Corymbophanes andersoni and C. kaiei, we included in our phylogenetic analysis several populations of Corymbophanes from different parts of the Kuribrong River basin, giving us the opportunity to test hypotheses related not only to species relationships, but also population-level divergence and pathways by which Corymbophanes may have dispersed into and throughout the upper Kuribrong River drainage. The geographic distribution of these samples is illustrated in Figure 1. We also included both specimens of the enigmatic recently collected species from the upper Ireng River.</p><p>As outgroups, we included representatives of six other genera found to be included in the tribe Ancistrini in the multilocus analysis by Lujan et al. (2015): Ancistrus, Dekeyseria, Guyanancistrus, Hopliancistrus, Lasiancistrus and Pseudolithoxus, plus Cryptancistrus, which was found to be sister to Corymbophanes in a multilocus analysis by Fisch-Muller et al. (2018), and Araichthys, which was found to be sister to Hopliancistrus in a phylogenomic analysis by Roxo et al. (2019). To root our trees, we included Lithogenes villosus, which has been found to be either sister to all other Loricariidae based on morphological data (Schaefer, 2003) or part of a basal polytomy with Delturinae based on multilocus analyses (Lujan et al., 2015) and Cteniloricaria platystoma, which is a member of the subfamily Loricariinae that is sister to Hypostominae + Hypoptopomatinae.</p><p>TISSUE AND DNA SOURCES</p><p>Newly generated sequence data (Table 2) were obtained from tissue samples or DNA extracts collected by the authors or provided by the Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University in Philadelphia, PA, USA (ANSP), the Auburn University Museum Fish Collection in Auburn, AL, USA (AUM), the Laboratório de Biologia e Genética de Peixes, Departamento de Morfologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Estadual Paulista ‘ Júlio de Mesquita Filho’, Campus de Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil (LBP), the Royal Ontario Museum in Toronto, Canada (ROM), the Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle, Geneva, Switzerland (MHNG) or obtained via the ornamental fish trade. Voucher specimens (Table 2) were identified either by direct examination or in collaboration with museum workers at different institutions. Most of the taxa in our analysis were represented in either this or previous analyses by multiple individuals, but Corymbophanes andersoni was represented in our analysis by only a single degraded tissue collected in 1998. Institutional abbreviations follow Sabaj (2016).</p><p>MOLECULAR MARKERS, DNA EXTRACTION, AMPLIFICATION AND SEQUENCING</p><p>Molecular phylogenetic methods followed those of Lujan et al. (2015) with the exception that the mitochondrial gene region NADH dehydrogenase 2 (ND2) was added to this analysis and the nuclear gene region MyH6 was not examined in this study. In brief, we amplified and sequenced a fragment of the mitochondrial 16S (538 bp), cytochrome b (865 bp) and ND2 (1040 bp) genes, as well as fragments of the nuclear RAG1 (807 bp) and RAG2 (873 bp) genes for a total of 4123 aligned base pairs. Most gene regions were sequenced from most taxa (Table 2), with the exception that only the 16S gene region could be amplified and sequenced from Corymbophanes andersoni .</p><p>Gene regions were amplified using combinations of previously published primers (Arroyave et al., 2013; Lujan et al., 2015). Whole genomic DNA was extracted from fin or muscle tissues preserved in 95% ethanol following either manufacturer’s instructions for the DNeasy Blood &amp; Tissue Kit (Qiagen N.V., Venlo, Netherlands) or standard laboratory protocols for salt extraction followed by ethanol precipitation. Fragment amplifications were performed following the methods of Arroyave et al. (2013) and Lujan et al. (2015).</p>AUF 10303XX4XXXXAUM 67193Guyana Ireng<p>Post-PCR clean-up of all loci was achieved by either running the entire volume of PCR product on a 1% agarose gel with 0.01% SYBR Safe DNA gel stain (LTI: Life Technologies Inc., Carlsbad, CA) or by adding ExoSap-IT (Applied Biosystems Co., Foster City, CA) and following manufacturer’s instructions. For samples that were gel purified, the band corresponding to the target locus was cut from the gel and the target PCR product extracted by centrifuge filtration through the top of a P-200 pipette filter tip in a labelled 1 mL snaptop tube (5 min at 15 000 rpm) followed by precipitation and washing of the DNA to remove salts. Forward and reverse sequencing reactions either followed the manufacturer’s recommendations for sequencing on an Applied Biosystems 3730 DNA Analyzer (LTI) at the Royal Ontario Museum or were conducted by staff at The Centre for Applied Genomics at The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids) in Toronto, ON, Canada.</p><p>SEQUENCE ASSEMBLY, ALIGNMENT AND PHYLOGENETIC INFERENCE</p><p>Sequence data were assembled, edited, aligned and concatenated following the methods of Lujan et al. (2015). PartitionFinder (v.1.1.1, Lanfear et al., 2012) was used to determine codon-position specific models of molecular evolution for each gene under the Bayesian information criterion (BIC).</p><p>For the Bayesian analysis, an HKY model with rate heterogeneity being modelled by a gamma distribution (HKY+G) was determined to be the best model of molecular evolution for third codon positions of ND2 and Cytb and first codon positions of RAG1 and RAG2. A GTR model with a proportion of invariable sites estimated and with rate heterogeneity being modelled by a gamma distribution (GTR+I+G) was determined to be the best model for 16S and the first codon positions of ND2 and Cytb. An HKY model with a proportion of invariable sites estimated (HKY+I) was determined to be the best model for the second codon positions of ND2 and Cytb. A K80 model with a proportion of invariable sites estimated (K80+I) was determined to be the best model for the second codon positions of RAG1 and RAG2. And a K80 model with rate heterogeneity being modelled by a gamma distribution (K80+G) was determined to be the best model for the third codon positions of RAG1 and RAG2. All data partitions were unlinked with rates free to vary across partitions and Lithogenes villosus designated as the outgroup.</p><p>For the Bayesian analysis, a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) search of tree space was conducted using MrBayes (v.3.2.3; Ronquist &amp; Huelsenbeck, 2003) programmed to run for 10 million generations using two sets of eight chains (one cold, seven hot, with default temperature parameter), sampling every 666 trees with the first 5000 trees (~33%) being discarded as burn-in, thus generating a total of 10 000 trees from which posterior probabilities were calculated. The Bayesian search was determined to have reached stationarity when likelihood values of the cold chains began randomly fluctuating within a stable range and when effective sample sizes for all metrics exceeded 2000 as determined by the program TRACER (v.1.6; Rambaut et al., 2007).</p><p>For the maximum likelihood analysis, the concatenated alignment was also partitioned by genes and codon positions, but the same model (GTR+G) was used for all partitions. Maximum likelihood analysis was conducted using RAxML (v.8.0.0; Stamatakis, 2014) run locally, with a 200 generation GTR+G search for a best tree and a 2000 generation GTR+G bootstrap.</p><p>PRESENTATION OF PHYLOGENETIC RESULTS</p><p>Complete results of the Bayesian and maximum likelihood analyses are presented as Supporting Information (Figs S1, S 2). Manuscript figures were trimmed of select outgroup taxa and were based on results of the Bayesian analysis. Node support values from both the Bayesian and maximum likelihood analyses are provided in Table 3. We also provide Bayesian posterior probability (i.e. Bayesian inference = BI) and maximum likelihood (ML) bootstrap support values for each node discussed in the text.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A3CC011B10BC6CFCCBF977F721FB5A	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Lujan, Nathan K.;Armbruster, Jonathan W.;Werneke, David C.;Teixeira, Túlio Franco;Lovejoy, Nathan R.	Lujan, Nathan K., Armbruster, Jonathan W., Werneke, David C., Teixeira, Túlio Franco, Lovejoy, Nathan R. (2020): Phylogeny and biogeography of the Brazilian-Guiana Shield endemic Corymbophanes clade of armoured catfishes (Loricariidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 188: 1213-1235
03A3CC011B1BBC62FF41FB86F090F902.text	03A3CC011B1BBC62FF41FB86F090F902.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Corymbophanes Eigenmann 1909	<div><p>Corymbophanes species relationships</p><p>Corymbophanes is strongly supported as monophyletic (Fig. 2, Node 7: BI: 1, ML: 100), with C. kaiei being sister to a weakly supported clade containing C. andersoni and C. ameliae (Fig. 2, Node 6: BI: 0.63, ML: 86), a relationship informed only by the 16S gene region (the only DNA sequence obtained from C. andersoni).</p><p>TAXONOMIC ACCOUNTS</p><p>CORYMBOPHANES AMELIAE LUJAN ET AL., SP. NOV. [FIGS. 4, 5, 6, TABLES 4, 5].</p><p>urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 0CF1AEDC-FF34-49D7- A4EE-C917FE53A411</p><p>CORYMBOPHANES KAIEI – LUJAN ET AL., 2015: 278, 281</p><p>[molecular phylogeny, data sent to GenBank]</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A3CC011B1BBC62FF41FB86F090F902	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Lujan, Nathan K.;Armbruster, Jonathan W.;Werneke, David C.;Teixeira, Túlio Franco;Lovejoy, Nathan R.	Lujan, Nathan K., Armbruster, Jonathan W., Werneke, David C., Teixeira, Túlio Franco, Lovejoy, Nathan R. (2020): Phylogeny and biogeography of the Brazilian-Guiana Shield endemic Corymbophanes clade of armoured catfishes (Loricariidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 188: 1213-1235
03A3CC011B1BBC64FF55F962F067FC2D.text	03A3CC011B1BBC64FF55F962F067FC2D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Corymbophanes kaiei Armbruster & Sabaj 2000	<div><p>CORYMBOPHANES KAIEI – LUJAN ET AL., 2017: 323</p><p>[molecular phylogeny]</p><p>CORYMBOPHANES KAIEI – FISCH-MULLER ET AL., 2018: 11, 18</p><p>[molecular phylogeny, data from GenBank]</p><p>Holotype: CSBD F1721, ex. ROM 89895, 89.3 mm SL; GUYANA, Region 8 (Potaro–Siparuni), Kuribrong River, Potaro River –Essequibo River drainage, at rapids ~15 min upstream of upstream Kuribrong Camp; 05.33766°, -059.56615°, 454 m a.s.l.; 19–20 March 2011; N. K. Lujan, F. C. T. Lima, T. C. Pessali, T. F. Teixera, P. Bernardo, A. Khan, G. Savory and K. Andrew.</p><p>Paratypes: All collections GUYANA, Region 8 ( Potaro–Siparuni), Kuribrong River, Potaro River – Essequibo River drainage . AUM 53676, 1, 100.6 mm SL, tributary of Kuribrong River, above Amaila Falls, 05.36637°, -059.54324°, 29 March 2011, B. Noonan ; AUM 62704, 2, 72.5–99.6 mm SL, Amaila River, at campsite near confluence with Kuribrong, 05.37626°, -059.55114°, 5–6 March 2014, E. A. Liverpool and D. C. Taphorn ; AUM 62732, 1, 84.6 mm SL, Amaila River, mouth, 05.37608°, -059.55053°, 8 Mar 2014, D.C. Taphorn, E. A. Liverpool and L. Benjamin ; AUM 62741, 1, 55.8 mm SL, Amaila River, just upstream from mouth, 05.37608°, -059.55053°, 7–8 March 2014, D. C. Taphorn, J. W. Armbruster, D. C. Werneke, E. A. Liverpool and D. P. Fernandes ; MZUSP 110846, 3, 81.6–88.3 mm SL, same data as holotype; ROM 89856, 1, 73.6 mm SL, same locality of holotype, 16 March 2011, N. K. Lujan, F. C. T. Lima, T. C. Pessali and T. F. Teixera; ROM 89895, 3, 86.4–93.8 mm SL, same data as holotype; ROM 89897, 3, 80.7–92.7 mm SL, same locality as holotype, 20–22 March 2011, T. C. Pessali and T. F. Teixera; ROM 91390, 1, not measured, upper Kuribrong River at right (south) bank tributary mouth, 05.32438°, -059.57321°, 15–17 October 2011, D. Abraham and N. K. Lujan ; ROM 91506, 2, not measured, small right (south) bank tributary of upper Kuribrong upstream upper rapids (rapid 3), 05.33458°, -059.56738°, 15, 16 and 18 October 2011, D. Abraham and N. K. Lujan ; ROM 91402, 1, not measured, upper Kuribrong River at upper rapid (rapid 3), 05.34109°, -059.56474°, 24 October 2011, N.K. Lujan, D. Abraham, D. Stoby, D. Gordon and O. Williams ; ROM 94980, 2, not measured, rapid 6, tributary of upper Kuribrong, Itabu Creek, 05.29113°, -059.71923°, 28 March 2014, D. C. Taphorn, E. Liverpool, H. Lopéz-Fernández, M. Benjamin and G. Pablo .</p><p>Non-types: All collections GUYANA, Region 8 (Potaro– Siparuni), Kuribrong River, Potaro River–Essequibo River drainage. AUM 62801, 1, Kuribrong River, above Amaila Falls in rapid 1, 05.37608°, -59.55053°; AUM 62811, 1, Kuribrong River, at riffle midway between rapid 1 and 2, 1.58 km SSE of Amaila River confluence, 05.36405°, -59.54318°. These specimens are small juveniles whose identity cannot be confirmed.</p><p>Diagnosis: Corymbophanes ameliae can be distinguished from C. andersoni by having dark and light vermiculations on the ventral surface and bands in the caudal fin (vs. white spots on the caudal fin and ventral surface white to grey) and by generally having the anal fin i,5 (vs. i,4; two specimens of C. ameliae are i,4). Corymbophanes ameliae can be separated from C. kaiei by having a longer head (Fig. 7) that is more rounded (vs. straight), by having a narrow caudal peduncle, visible dorsally by being nearly flat at end and ventrally by having the minimum caudal peduncle width 10.1–12.2% HL (vs. 12.3–13.0% HL; Fig. 7). Corymbophanes ameliae can be separated from the new genus Yaluwak by lacking hypertrophied cheek odontodes and evertible cheek plates. The only other loricariid with which Corymbophanes ameliae is sympatric is Hypostomus hemiurus, from which it can be distinguished by lacking an adipose fin.</p><p>Description: Morphometrics in Table 4; meristics in Table 5. Counts and measurements based on 16 specimens. It is a member of subfamily Hypostominae, tribe Ancistrini sensu Lujan et al. (2015) . Small to medium-sized loricariids, largest specimen examined 100.6 mm SL. Body narrow, subcylindrical with ventral surface completely flat, dorsal surface flattened from dorsal to adipose origins and tapering from cleithrum to caudal fin. Head gently sloped to dorsal fin. Parieto-supraoccipital not higher than nuchal region. Dorsal slope decreasing in straight line to insertion of dorsal procurrent caudal-fin rays then ascending to caudal fin. Body depth greatest at origin of dorsal fin. Ventral profile flat to caudal fin. Caudal peduncle almost triangular in cross section: flattened laterally, becoming transversely pointed dorsally and flattened ventrally. Body widest at origin of pectoral fins, narrowest at origin of caudal fin. Snout rounded.</p><p>Eye small (orbit diameter 15.3 ± 1.0% of head length), dorsal rim of orbit slightly higher than interorbital space. Iris operculum absent. Interorbital space with slight, rounded, median hump. Parieto-supraoccipital straight posteriorly with no crest. Infraorbitals, frontal, nasal, compound pterotic and parieto-supraoccipital supporting odontodes. Preopercle without odontodes. Exposed portion of opercle oval (long axis in anteroventral to posterodorsal angle) covered with odontodes (those along ventral margin slightly longer).</p><p>Lips covered with short papillae with circular bases. Lower lip wide, reaching just to, or slightly short of, pectoral girdle; upper lip narrow. Edge of lower lip smooth. Maxillary barbel reaching about half distance to gill opening from base of barbel.</p><p>Median plates 22(1), 23(11) or 24(4). Plates unkeeled, but first three or four plates of mid-ventral series bent to form a slight ridge and ventral plates posterior to pelvic fin with concave dorsal halves forming ventral ridge; ventral ridge most pronounced posteriorly. Mid-dorsal plate row consisting of just three plates anteriorly; mid-ventral plate row ends ventral to anterior portion of postdorsal ridge; dorsal and median plate rows complete, ventral row beginning dorsal to pelvic-fin origin; three caudal peduncle plate rows. Plates on all dorsolateral surfaces of body; ventral surface of head and abdomen naked. Cheek plates not evertible; cheek dontodes slightly longer than average body odontodes present along dorsal-, adipose-, pelvic-, caudal- and pectoral-fin spines; larger individuals with somewhat larger odontodes at tip of pectoral spine.</p><p>Dorsal fin ii,7; dorsal spinelet V -shaped, dorsal-fin locking mechanism present, spinelet ranging from covered in skin to just slightly exposed; last ray of dorsal fin almost reaching postdorsal ridge when adpressed. Adipose fin absent, replaced by postdorsal ridge of 12(2), 13(3), 14(3), 15(3), 16(4) or 18(1) median, azygous plates. Caudal fin i,14,i (one specimen i,13,i); caudal fin slightly forked, ventral lobe longer than dorsal lobe. Pectoral fin i,6; pectoral-fin spine reaching almost to pelvic fin when adpressed. Pelvic fin i,5; pelvic-fin spine extending almost to anal fin when adpressed. Anal fin i,4(2) or i,5(14); unbranched anal-fin ray slightly shorter than first branched ray.</p><p>ILM, Inter-Landmark.</p><p>Teeth bicuspid with lateral cusp one-half to threequarters length of medial cusp and lateral cusp half width of medial cusp; 38–70 left dentary teeth (mode 54; one specimen damaged); 44–76 left premaxillary teeth (mode 44; one specimen damaged).</p><p>Coloration: Dorsal surface and sides of head and body dark brown to black with small white to cream-colored spots (most spots smaller than eye size; Figs. 4, 5). Light spots smallest and most tightly spaced on head, becoming slightly larger and more irregularly spaced towards caudal peduncle; combining to form bars and/or vermiculations in some larger specimens. Ventral surface brown with distinct white vermiculations (light and dark vermiculations of approximately equal width); centre of dark vermiculations often fade towards middle of abdomen. Fin spines and rays tan to cream with dark spots forming bands (interradial membranes grey to brown); light areas generally narrower than intervening dark bands. Juveniles more uniformly coloured; appear medium to dark brown overall except for faint light spots on head, faint light bands on caudal fin and lightly pigmented abdomen; sides of body slightly darker midlaterally, forming broad, diffuse, dark brown stripe.</p><p>Fig. 4). Specimen has slightly thickened skin over dorsal and lateral surfaces of body and posterior part of head. Skin greatly thickened in circular patch anterior to nares with fleshy area extending over snout tip. Skin in this patch rugose with greatly elongated odontodes distributed along the periphery of the naked area. Some hypertrophied odontodes in the centre of the circle, but the soft tissue is damaged due to rot. Longest odontodes at anterior corners of snout with largest much longer than head (38.7 mm long, 116% of head length). Odontodes also considerably longer along back of circle (longest 16.8 mm long, 47.8% of head length). Damage caused by rot means odontodes are loosely held in flesh and some are pushed inward, making exposed length difficult to ascertain. Pectoral-spine odontodes barely, if any, greater than other specimens. Out of the</p><p>&gt; 40 specimens of Corymbophanes that have been deposited in collections, this is the only individual to show any sign of sexual dimorphism.</p><p>Range: Known only from the Kuribrong River drainage upstream of Amaila Falls, and within this drainage only from regions adjacent to four rapids habitats (rapids 1, 3, 4 and 5; Figs. 1, 3).</p><p>Sexual dimorphism: Only nuptial male specimen known was found dead in a stream (AUM 53676, 100.6 mm SL, sex determined by examining gonads; Etymology: Named for Amelia, a Patamona Amerindian girl who disappeared near Amaila Falls in the late 19 th century. The falls are named for her, but her name was misspelled.</p><p>Haplotype diversity: Within Corymbophanes ameliae, ND 2 provided the most geographically associated variation (Fig. 3), although Cytb also exhibited multiple haplotypes that corresponded with geography. 16S was variable but geographically uninformative, and no fixed polymorphisms were observed within the nuclear RAG1 or RAG2 regions. The phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 2, Node 5: BI:</p><p>0.97, ML: 64) and ND2 haplotype network (Fig. 3) both supported a sister relationship between the C. ameliae population in tributary 4 (rapid 5) and those in the remainder of the upper Kuribrong River watershed (rapids 1–4; see Fig. 3 inset map). Some population structure was also detected within the upper Kuribrong River main channel, with a few individuals from rapid 1 immediately upstream of Amaila Falls being distinguished from both syntopic individuals and more upstream populations by a single ND2 polymorphism (Fig. 3).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A3CC011B1BBC64FF55F962F067FC2D	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Lujan, Nathan K.;Armbruster, Jonathan W.;Werneke, David C.;Teixeira, Túlio Franco;Lovejoy, Nathan R.	Lujan, Nathan K., Armbruster, Jonathan W., Werneke, David C., Teixeira, Túlio Franco, Lovejoy, Nathan R. (2020): Phylogeny and biogeography of the Brazilian-Guiana Shield endemic Corymbophanes clade of armoured catfishes (Loricariidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 188: 1213-1235
03A3CC011B1DBC64FF37FBC5F078FBE6.text	03A3CC011B1DBC64FF37FBC5F078FBE6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Yaluwak LUJAN & ARMBRUSTER 2020	<div><p>YALUWAK LUJAN &amp; ARMBRUSTER, GEN. NOV.</p><p>urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 62553708-A74C-4695-88A0- 76B32F1C0EB4</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A3CC011B1DBC64FF37FBC5F078FBE6	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Lujan, Nathan K.;Armbruster, Jonathan W.;Werneke, David C.;Teixeira, Túlio Franco;Lovejoy, Nathan R.	Lujan, Nathan K., Armbruster, Jonathan W., Werneke, David C., Teixeira, Túlio Franco, Lovejoy, Nathan R. (2020): Phylogeny and biogeography of the Brazilian-Guiana Shield endemic Corymbophanes clade of armoured catfishes (Loricariidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 188: 1213-1235
