identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
03A187F8FFCF9E2AFF2D711C78810148.text	03A187F8FFCF9E2AFF2D711C78810148.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Abdosetae	<div><p>Key to the genus Abdosetae</p><p>1. Male................................................................................................ 2</p><p>- Female.............................................................................................. 6</p><p>2. RTA without branch on the inner side...................................................................... 3</p><p>- RTA with one branch on the inner side..................................................................... 4</p><p>3. TA inconspicuous, hump-shaped.................................................................. A. hainan</p><p>- TA conspicuous, spine-shaped.................................................................... A. ornata</p><p>4. RTA basally and apically each with one large hump on the inner side; RTA branch hook-shaped......... A. hamata sp. nov.</p><p>- RTA without hump on the inner side; RTA branch not hook-shaped.............................................. 5</p><p>5. RTA branch thumb-shaped; TA spine-shaped, bent to the retrolateral side.......................... A. digitata sp. nov.</p><p>- RTA branch sickle-shaped; TA knife-shaped, vertical........................................... A. falcata sp. nov.</p><p>6. Epigyne without concavities; COs visible.................................................................. 7</p><p>- Epigyne with pair of concavities; COs concealed in the anterior margins of concavities.............................. 8</p><p>7. Spermathecae kidney-shaped and close together...................................................... A. hainan</p><p>- Spermathecae spherical and separated by almost one spermatheca’s diameter............................... A. ornata</p><p>8. Posterior margins of concavities conspicuously sclerotized; spermathecae separated from each other..... A. digitata sp. nov.</p><p>- Posterior margins of concavities unsclerotized; spermathecae close together....................................... 9</p><p>9. COs trumpet-shaped and large............................................................. A. falcata sp. nov.</p><p>- COs not trumpet-shaped and smaller........................................................ A. hamata sp. nov.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A187F8FFCF9E2AFF2D711C78810148	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Jin, Chi;Fu, Jianying;Zhang, Feng	Jin, Chi, Fu, Jianying, Zhang, Feng (2015): A review of the genus Abdosetae (Araneae: Phrurolithidae) from China. Zootaxa 4007 (1): 91-103, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4007.1.6
03A187F8FFCF9E29FF2D77F879EE0631.text	03A187F8FFCF9E29FF2D77F879EE0631.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Abdosetae Fu, Zhang & MacDermott 2010	<div><p>Abdosetae Fu, Zhang &amp; MacDermott, 2010</p><p>Abdosetae Fu et al., 2010: 86 .</p><p>Type species: Abdosetae hainan Fu, Zhang &amp; MacDermott, 2010, by original designation.</p><p>Diagnosis. This genus resembles Otacilia Thorell, 1897 in habitus and body pattern. The narrow cephalic part of the cephalothorax widens abruptly to the thoracic part; the cheliceral promargin usually has three separated teeth and the retromargin has two teeth that are close to one another; however, Abdosetae differs from Otacilia by: 1) the male abdomen ventrally with a double longitudinal row of long setae behind the epigastral fold and with a tuft of bristles anterior to the spinnerets, whereas Otacilia lacks them; 2) the chelicerae have a single long spine anteriorly, whereas Otacilia have two spines (one long and one short); 3) the male palpal femora is not visibly modified ventrally, only somewhat swollen, and has a distal concavity, whereas Otacilia often have a distinct knob-shaped compressed apophysis; 4) the male palpal tibia has one large RTA and one slender DTA, whereas Otacilia have one or two RTAs of different sizes; 5) femur I with three prolateral spines distally, while Otacilia usually have more than three spines, often four; 6) all femora basally without any dorsal spines, whereas Otacilia usually have one short dorsal spine. All the provided Otacilia characters are according to Jäger and Wunderlich (2012).</p><p>Description. Small spiders, total length 1.80–3.50. Carapace low, smooth, elongate-ovoid in dorsal view, highest near fovea, widest at coxae II and III; yellowish-brown to brown; cephalic groove and radial furrow brown; fovea short, longitudinal. Eyes moderately large, arranged in two recurved rows. From above, PER wider than AER; AME nearly the same size as ALE; PME separated, smaller than PLE and reduced in female. Chelicerae pale brown, with three well separated promarginal and two close retromarginal teeth; with single long spine anteriorly. Endites longer than wide (4/3), convex laterally, obliquely depressed; labium broad, rounded distally; sternum truncate anteriorly, pointed posteriorly, precoxal triangles present. Leg formula: 4123. Legs brown, all femora without a dorsal spine, with only a row of ventral spines; femur I usually with three prolateral spines distally, femur II usually with two prolateral spines; tibia I usually with six proventral spines and seven retroventral spines, tibia II usually with six pairs of ventral spines; metatarsus I usually with four pairs of ventral spines, metatarsus II usually with four proventral spines and three retroventral spines; posterior legs lack spines; metatarsi III and IV with distal preening brush; leg scopulae absent, claw tufts consisting of several well developed spatulate hairs. Abdomen oval, yellowish, with narrow anterior dorsal scutum in males. Colulus lacking. In males, abdomen ventrally with two rows of long setae behind the epigastral fold and tuft of bristles anterior to the spinnerets. In females, PLS with distal conical segment, small, with a few spigots with enlarged bases; PMS enlarged, laterally compressed with two parallel rows of atypical cylindrical gland spigots. Male palp: femur lacking ventral hump, only somewhat swollen, with distal concavity; tibia with one large RTA, one slender DTA and one conspicuous VTH; cymbium with 2 spines at the tip, one long and one short and one RBC; tegulum convex, usually with conspicuous apophysis; sperm duct short, thick and distinct; embolus relatively long, situated at tip of tegulum. Epigyne either with a pair of shallow concavities or flat, copulatory openings concealed in anterior margins of concavities or exposed; copulatory ducts short, connected to two transparent bursae; spermathecae small and usually spherical; a short tube connects the bursae’s oval, sclerotized bases and the spermathecae.</p><p>Distribution. China ( Hainan), Malaysia.</p><p>Composition. Five species, including three new species described here: Abdosetae hainan Fu et al., 2010, A. ornata (Deeleman-Reinhold, 2001), A. digitata sp. nov., A. falcata sp. nov. and A. hamata sp. nov. .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A187F8FFCF9E29FF2D77F879EE0631	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Jin, Chi;Fu, Jianying;Zhang, Feng	Jin, Chi, Fu, Jianying, Zhang, Feng (2015): A review of the genus Abdosetae (Araneae: Phrurolithidae) from China. Zootaxa 4007 (1): 91-103, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4007.1.6
03A187F8FFCC9E2FFF2D709079010782.text	03A187F8FFCC9E2FFF2D709079010782.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Abdosetae hainan Fu, Zhang & MacDermott 2010	<div><p>Abdosetae hainan Fu, Zhang &amp; MacDermott, 2010</p><p>Fig. 1</p><p>Abdosetae hainan Fu et al., 2010: 86, fig 1–11 (♂ ♀).</p><p>Material examined. Type material: male (holotype) and one female (paratype), China, Hainan Province, Lingshui County, Mt. Diaoluo (18.87°N, 109.83°E), 6 June 2009, leg. Chao Zhang and Guangxin Han (deposited in MHBU, examined).</p><p>Other material examined. China, Hainan Province: 3♀ 2♂, Lingshui County, Mt. Diaoluo (18°40′13″N, 109°53′44″E), 250 m a.s.l., 29 January 2015, leg. Chi Jin (MHBU); 1♀ 1♂, Lingshui County, Mt. Diaoluo (18°41′23″N, 109°52′18″E), 274 m a.s.l., 27 January 2015, leg. Chi Jin (MHBU).</p><p>Diagnosis. This species can be easily distinguished from other Chinese species by lacking a RTA branch, the more distal palpal ventral tibial hump, the epigyne that lacks concavities, and the copulatory openings that are visible. The species can be distinguished from A. ornata by the following characters: 1) the embolus is relatively longer; 2) the DTA has a hooked tip and is more slender; 3) the TA is inconspicuous and hump-shaped, whereas it is conspicuous and spine-shaped in A. ornata; 4) the spermathecae are kidney-shaped and close together, whereas they are spherical and separated by almost one spermatheca’s diameter in A. ornata .</p><p>Description. Male. Total length 1.93–2.06 (n=4). Holotype (Fig. 1 A): total length 1.95; carapace 0.97 long, 0.84 wide; abdomen 0.81 long, 0.59 wide. Carapace elongate-ovoid in dorsal view, abruptly narrowing anteriorly, thoracic part slightly higher than cephalic part, highest nearly at fovea, widest at coxae II and III; pale brown at centre, dark grey at periphery, cephalic groove and radial furrow brown; fovea distinct, short, longitudinal. In dorsal view, AER slightly recurved, PER slightly wider than AER and recurved; eye diameters: AME 0.09, ALE 0.08, PME 0.07, PLE 0.08; eye interdistances: AME–AME 0.02, AME–ALE 0.01, PME–PME 0.08, PME–PLE 0.03, ALE–PLE 0.06; MOA 0.18 long, front width 0.18, back width 0.22. Clypeus height 0.09. Leg measurements: I 3.72 (0.96 + 0.35 + 1.03 + 0.91 + 0.47), II 3.06 (0.82 + 0.35 + 0.73 + 0.73 + 0.43), III 2.92 (0.78 + 0.30 + 0.60 + 0.75 + 0.49), IV 4.24 (1.09 + 0.37 + 0.97 + 1.16 + 0.65). Leg spination: see Table 1.</p><p>Abdomen ovoid, light grey; posterior half dark with several indistinct chevrons dorsally; flanks dark grey (Fig. 1 A).</p><p>Palp (Figs 1 G–I). Femur distally weakly swollen ventrally. Tibia with one thick RTA, one slender DTA and one conspicuous VTH. RTA wide basally, abruptly narrowing, with slender tip; humped retrolaterally, with ventral humps on prolateral side medially. DTA with hooked tip, bending towards cymbium. Cymbium with RBC that is visible in ventral and dorsal views. Tegulum convex, tegular apophysis inconspicuous, hump-shaped. Embolus spine-shaped, relatively short, situated at tip of tegulum, pointed towards 1 o’clock position.</p><p>Species sex femur tibia metatarsus</p><p>I II I II I II</p><p>hainan ♂ pd 3 pd 1 v 6- 6 v 6- 6 v 4-4 pv 4, rv 3 ♀ pd 3 pd 2 pv 6, rv 6 or 7 v 6- 6 v 4- 4 v 4-4</p><p>digitata sp. nov. ♂ pd 3 pd 2 pv 6 or 7, rv 7 v 6- 6 v 4-4 pv 4, rv 3 ♀ pd 3 pd 2 pv 6, rv 7 v 6-6 pv 4, rv 4 or 5 pv 4, rv 3</p><p>falcata sp. nov. ♂ pd 3 pd 1 pv 6, rv 6 or 7 pv 6, rv 5 or 6 v 4-4 pv 4, rv 3 ♀ pd 3 pd 2 pv 6, rv 7 v 6- 6 v 4-4 pv 4, rv 3</p><p>hamata sp. nov. ♂ pd 3 pd 2 pv 6, rv 7 pv 5 or 6, rv 6 v 4-4 pv 4, rv 3 ♀ pd 3 pd 2 pv 6, rv 7 v 6- 6 v 4-4 pv 4, rv 3 Female. Total length 2.43–2.48 (n=5). Paratype (Fig. 1 B): total length 2.43; carapace 1.06 long, 0.93 wide; abdomen 1.31 long, 0.92 wide. Clypeus height 0.08. Eye diameters: AME 0.08, ALE 0.07, PME 0.07, PLE 0.08; eye interdistances: AME–AME 0.04, AME–ALE 0.01, PME–PME 0.09, PME–PLE 0.03, ALE–PLE 0.07; MOA 0.18 long, front width 0.16, back width 0.22. Leg measurements: I 3.64 (0.98 + 0.36 + 1.00 + 0.89 + 0.41); II 3.13 (0.84 + 0.33 + 0.79 + 0.71 +0.46); III 3.01 (0.81 + 0.33 + 0.61 + 0.78 + 0.48); IV 4.44 (1.14 + 0.39 + 1.00 + 1.24 + 0.67). Leg formula: 4123. Leg spination: see Table 1.</p><p>Abdomen dorsally without scutum, with longitudinal black stripe. Body darker than in male; other characters as in male.</p><p>Epigyne (Figs 1 E–F). Without concavities, flat, copulatory openings situated centrally, round and visible; copulatory ducts relatively short, connected to two large, oval transparent bursae that have an oval, sclerotized base; spermathecae small and kidney-shaped, close together, located proximally; longitudinal distance between copulatory openings and spermathecae is almost one spermatheca’s length; bursae and spermathecae connected by slender tube.</p><p>Distribution. Known from three localities in south-western Hainan (Fig. 8).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A187F8FFCC9E2FFF2D709079010782	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Jin, Chi;Fu, Jianying;Zhang, Feng	Jin, Chi, Fu, Jianying, Zhang, Feng (2015): A review of the genus Abdosetae (Araneae: Phrurolithidae) from China. Zootaxa 4007 (1): 91-103, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4007.1.6
03A187F8FFCA9E2EFF2D71CB79470766.text	03A187F8FFCA9E2EFF2D71CB79470766.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Abdosetae digitata	<div><p>Abdosetae digitata sp. nov.</p><p>Figs 2–3</p><p>Type material. Holotype ♂, China, Hainan Province, Ledong County, Mt. Jianfengling, Tianchi Lake (18°44′25″N, 108°51′44″E), 825 m a.s.l., 29 January 2015, leg. Lina Fu (MHBU). Paratypes: 2♀, same data as holotype (MHBU); Hainan Province: 1♀, Mt. Wuzhi (18°51′59″N, 109°40′46″E), 662 m a.s.l., 26 January 2015, leg. Chi Jin (MHBU); 1♂, Baoting County, Mt. Qixianling (18°42′01″N, 109°41′51″E), 340 m a.s.l., 8 June 2009, leg. Guangxin Han (MHBU).</p><p>Etymology. The species name is from a Latin adjective meaning “digitiform”, and refers to the thumb-shaped branch on the inner side of the RTA medially on the male palp.</p><p>Diagnosis. This new species can be easily distinguished from A. hainan and A. ornata by having one branch on the inner side of the RTA, and the epigyne with a pair of shallow concavities that conceal the copulatory openings in their anterior margins. It can be distinguished from A. falcata sp. nov. and A. hamata sp. nov. by: 1) a thumbshaped RTA branch, whereas the other two species have a RTA branch that is sickle-shaped and hook-shaped, respectively; 2) a spine-shaped TA that is slightly bent to the retrolateral side, whereas in the latter two species the TA is canine-shaped and bent to the prolateral side, and knife-shaped and longitudinally orientated, respectively; 3) the posterior margins of the epigynal concavities are conspicuously sclerotized, whereas they are unsclerotized in the latter two species; 4) the spermathecae are separated from each other, whereas they are close together in the latter two species.</p><p>Description. Male. Total length 1.95–2.56 (n=2). Holotype (Fig. 2 A): total length 2.56; carapace 1.29 long, 1.12 wide; abdomen 1.27 long, 0.90 wide. Carapace ovoid, yellowish-brown at centre, with black marginal bands, cephalic groove and radial furrow brown. In dorsal view, AER slightly recurved, PER slightly wider than AER and recurved; eye diameters: AME 0.09, ALE 0.10, PME 0.08, PLE 0.11; eye interdistances: AME–AME 0.04, AME– ALE 0.01, PME–PME 0.09, PME–PLE 0.04, ALE–PLE 0.07; MOA 0.19 long, front width 0.18, back width 0.21. Clypeus height 0.12. Chelicerae yellowish-brown, with single spine anteriorly. Leg measurements: I 4.74 (1.22 + 0.41 + 1.33 + 1.17 + 0.61), II 3.95 (1.07 + 0.48 + 1.00 + 0.94 + 0.46), III 3.86 (0.97 + 0.35 + 0.84 + 1.04 + 0.66), IV 5.52 (1.38 + 0.49 + 1.26 + 1.52 + 0.87). Leg spination: see Table 1.</p><p>Abdomen ovoid, light grey; posterior half dark with several indistinct black chevrons dorsally; flanks black (Fig. 2 A).</p><p>Palp (Figs 2 G–I, 3C–E). Femur heavily swollen on ventral side, with distal concavity on retrolateral side. RTA wide basally, wider distally, with one short, thumb-shaped branch medially; one triangular apophysis between branch and apex, with tip bent in prolateral direction; VTH inconspicuous; DTA lamellar, twisted, with thick base and hooked tip; cymbium with RBC that is visible only in dorsal view; tegular apophysis conspicuous, short, spineshaped, slightly bent in the retrolateral direction; embolus slender, with sharp tip, pointed towards 12 o’clock position.</p><p>Female. Total length 2.19–3.28 (n=3). Paratype (Fig. 2 B): total length 3.28; carapace 1.44 long, 1.19 wide; abdomen 1.93 long, 1.16 wide. Clypeus height 0.10. Eye diameters: AME 0.08, ALE 0.09, PME 0.08, PLE 0.11; eye interdistances: AME–AME 0.05, AME–ALE 0.01, PME–PME 0.10, PME–PLE 0.04, ALE–PLE 0.07; MOA 0.20 long, front width 0.16, back width 0.23. Leg measurements: I 4.93 (1.30 + 0.51 + 1.42 + 1.30 + 0.40); II 4.28 (1.03 + 0.47 + 1.09 + 1.08 +0.61); III 4.12 (1.07 + 0.43 + 0.84 + 1.09 + 0.69); IV 5.75 (1.48 + 0.51 + 1.30 + 1.61 + 0.85). Leg formula: 4123. Leg spination: see Table 1.</p><p>Abdomen dorsally with a longitudinal black stripe (Fig. 2 B). Carapace darker than in male; other characters as in male.</p><p>Epigyne (Figs 2 E–F, 3A–B). With a pair of shallow concavities, with inconspicuous anterior margins where copulatory openings are concealed, and conspicuous, sclerotized posterior margins; copulatory ducts connected to two oval, transparent bursae; bursae with oval, sclerotized bases; spermathecae small and spherical, separated by almost half a spermatheca’s diameter; vertical distance between copulatory openings and spermathecae nearly one spermatheca’s diameter; bursae and spermathecae connected by slender tube.</p><p>Distribution. Known from three localities in the southern half of Hainan (Fig. 8).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A187F8FFCA9E2EFF2D71CB79470766	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Jin, Chi;Fu, Jianying;Zhang, Feng	Jin, Chi, Fu, Jianying, Zhang, Feng (2015): A review of the genus Abdosetae (Araneae: Phrurolithidae) from China. Zootaxa 4007 (1): 91-103, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4007.1.6
03A187F8FFC89E22FF2D75337E50071E.text	03A187F8FFC89E22FF2D75337E50071E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Abdosetae falcata	<div><p>Abdosetae falcata sp. nov.</p><p>Figs 4–5</p><p>Type material. Holotype ♂, China, Hainan Province, Lingshui County, Mt. Diaoluo (18°43′27″N, 109°52′7″E), 926 m a.s.l., 28 January 2015, leg. Chi Jin (MHBU). Paratypes: 15♀, same data as holotype, leg. Chi Jin and Lina Fu (MHBU).</p><p>Etymology. The species name is from the Latin adjective “falcatus” and refers to the sickle-shaped branch basally on the inner side of the RTA of the male palp.</p><p>Diagnosis. This new species can be easily distinguished from A. hainan and A. ornata by having one branch on the inner side of the RTA and the epigyne has a pair of shallow concavities that conceal the copulatory openings in their interior margins. It can be distinguished from A. digitata sp. nov. and A. hamata sp. nov. by: 1) a sickleshaped RTA branch, whereas the latter two species have thumb-shaped and hook-shaped branches, respectively; 2) a canine-shaped TA that is bent in the prolateral direction, whereas the TA in the other two species are spine-shaped and slightly bent in the retrolateral direction, and knife-shaped and longitudinally orientated, respectively; 3) the anterior margins of the epigynal concavities are conspicuously sclerotized, while they are unsclerotized in the other two species; 4) the copulatory openings are trumpet-shaped and relatively large, whereas they are not trumpetshaped and are smaller in the other two species.</p><p>Description. Male. Holotype (Fig. 4 A): total length 2.33; carapace 1.45 long, 0.97 wide; abdomen 1.11 long, 0.73 wide. Carapace elongate-ovoid, yellowish-brown in the centre, with black marginal bands, cephalic groove and radial furrow pale brown. Eye diameters: AME 0.10, ALE 0.09, PME 0.08, PLE 0.09; eye interdistances: AME–AME 0.03, AME–ALE 0.01, PME–PME 0.09, PME–PLE 0.04, ALE–PLE 0.07; MOA 0.17 long, front width 0.16, back width 0.19. Clypeus height 0.09. Measurements of legs: I 4.20 (1.06 + 0.34 + 1.01 + 1.09 + 0.70), II 3.63 (0.94 + 0.37 + 0.90 + 0.86 + 0.56), III 3.15 (0.83 + 0.29 + 0.70 + 0.78 + 0.55), IV 4.30 (1.10 + 0.43 + 1.17 + 1.06 + 0.54). Leg measurements: see Table 1.</p><p>Abdomen ovoid, pale grey; dorsal scutum grey suffused with black; posterior half dark with several black chevrons dorsally; flanks black (Fig. 4 A).</p><p>Palp (Figs 4 G–I, 5D–E). Femur swollen on the ventral side and with distal concavity on the retrolateral side. RTA thick basally, narrow gradually, with beaked tip; in the ventral view, the RTA has one long, slender, sickleshaped branch, bent in the prolateral direction, one small, sharp apophysis basally and one triangular apophysis apically on the inner side. VTH inconspicuous. DTA lamellar, with thick base and hooked tip. Cymbium with an RBC that is visible from the retrolateral and the dorsal views. Tegular apophysis short, canine-shaped, bent slightly in the prolateral direction. Embolus sword-shaped, with sharp tip, pointed towards 11 o’clock position.</p><p>Female. Total length 2.25–3.35 (n=15). Paratype (Fig. 4 B): total length 3.35; carapace 1.43 long, 1.16 wide; abdomen 1.84 long, 1.17 wide. Clypeus height 0.11. Eye diameters: AME 0.09, ALE 0.09, PME 0.08, PLE 0.11; eye interdistances: AME–AME 0.04, AME–ALE 0.02, PME–PME 0.11 PME–PLE 0.05, ALE–PLE 0.10; MOA 0.18 long, front width 0.16, back width 0.22. Leg measurements: I 5.29 (1.36 + 0.59 + 1.42 + 1.34 + 0.58); II 4.45 (1.17 + 0.49 + 1.11 + 1.03 +0.65); III 4.18 (1.12 + 0.40 + 0.86 + 1.09 + 0.71); IV 6.03 (1.54 + 0.53 + 1.37 + 1.71 + 0.88). Leg formula: 4123. Leg spination: see Table 1.</p><p>Abdomen dorsally with longitudinal black stripe (Fig. 4 B). Carapace darker than in male; other characters as in male.</p><p>Epigyne (Figs 4 E–F, 5A–B). With pair of shallow concavities that conceal trumpet-shaped copulatory openings, with conspicuously sclerotized anterior margins, lacking conspicuous posterior margins; copulatory ducts connected to two kidney-shaped transparent bursae, bursae with oval, sclerotized bases; spermathecae small and spherical, close together, longitudinal distance between copulatory openings and spermathecae is approximately one spermatheca diameter; bursae and spermathecae connected by slender tube.</p><p>Distribution. Known only from the type locality (Fig. 8).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A187F8FFC89E22FF2D75337E50071E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Jin, Chi;Fu, Jianying;Zhang, Feng	Jin, Chi, Fu, Jianying, Zhang, Feng (2015): A review of the genus Abdosetae (Araneae: Phrurolithidae) from China. Zootaxa 4007 (1): 91-103, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4007.1.6
03A187F8FFC79E20FF2D717079010132.text	03A187F8FFC79E20FF2D717079010132.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Abdosetae hamata	<div><p>Abdosetae hamata sp. nov.</p><p>Figs 6–7</p><p>Type material. Holotype ♂, China, Hainan Province, Changjiang County, Mt. Bawangling, Yajia (19°05′14″N, 109°07′20″E), 441 m a.s.l., 3 February 2015, leg. Chi Jin (MHBU). Paratypes: 8♀ 2♂, same data as holotype (MHBU); 10♀ 6♂, Hainan Province, Changjiang County, Mt. Bawangling, Dongyi Scenic (19°07′03″N, 109°09′01″E), 639 m a.s.l., 4 February 2015, leg. Chi Jin and Lina Fu (MHBU); 5♀, Hainan Province, Changjiang County, Mt. Exianling (19°00′21″N, 109°08′14″E), 282 m a.s.l., 20 May 2009, leg. Shengtao Guo (MHBU).</p><p>Etymology. The species name is derived from the Latin adjective “hamatus”, and refers to the hook-shaped branch located medially on the inner side of the male palpal RTA.</p><p>Diagnosis. This new species can be easily distinguished from A. hainan and A. ornata by having one branch on the inner side of the RTA, and the epigyne with a pair of shallow concavities that conceal the copulatory openings in their anterior margins. It can be distinguished from A. digitata sp. nov. and A. falcata sp. nov. by: 1) a RTA branch that is hook-shaped, whereas the other two species have thumb-shaped and sickle-shaped branches, respectively; 2) a knife-shaped TA that is longitudinally orientated, whereas the TA in the other two species is spine-shaped and slightly bent in the retrolateral direction, and canine-shaped and bent in the prolateral direction, respectively; 3) a posterior margin of the epigyne that is clearly “M” shaped medially, whereas it is only slightly convex or excavated in the other two species, respectively; 4) spermathecae and copulatory openings that are in the same horizontal line, whereas they are not in the other two species.</p><p>Description. Male. Total length 1.85–2.12 (n=9). Holotype (Fig. 6 A): total length 2.12; carapace 0.98 long, 0.87 wide; abdomen 1.06 long, 0.74 wide. Carapace yellowish-brown with black marginal bands. In dorsal view, AER and PER slightly recurved; eye diameters: AME 0.08, ALE 0.07, PME 0.07, PLE 0.09; eye interdistances: AME–AME 0.04, AME–ALE 0.01, PME–PME 0.10, PME–PLE 0.03, ALE–PLE 0.07; MOA 0.17 long, front width 0.18, back width 0.23. Clypeus height 0.07. Leg measurements: I 3.59 (0.89 + 0.36 + 0.97 + 0.91 + 0.46), II 3.02 (0.80 + 0.32 + 0.71 + 0.72 + 0.47), III 2.82 (0.75 + 0.30 + 0.56 + 0.73 + 0.49), IV 4.02 (1.03 + 0.34 + 0.90 + 1.11 + 0.64). Leg spination: see Table 1.</p><p>Abdomen ovoid, light yellow; posterior half dark with several black chevrons dorsally; flanks black (Fig. 6 A). Palp (Figs 6 G–I, 7C–D). Femur swollen on ventral side, with inconspicuous concavity distally on retrolateral side; RTA thick, with beaked tip; RTA prolaterally with one large, basal hump, medially with one short, slender hookshaped branch bent in retrolateral direction and one tooth-like apophysis, apically with one relatively smaller hump; VTH inconspicuous; DTA lamellar, slender, with hooked tip, distant from RTA; cymbium with RBC that is visible from both ventral and dorsal views; tegular apophysis short, longitudinally orientated, knife-shaped and pointed apically; embolus spine-shaped, slender, with sharp tip, pointed towards 12 o’clock position.</p><p>Female. Total length 2.09–2.40 (n=23). Paratype (Fig. 6 B): total length 2.40; carapace 1.02 long, 0.93 wide; abdomen 1.35 long, 0.78 wide. Clypeus height 0.08. Eye diameters: AME 0.07, ALE 0.07, PME 0.07, PLE 0.09; eye interdistances: AME–AME 0.04, AME–ALE 0.01, PME–PME 0.08 PME–PLE 0.03, ALE–PLE 0.06; MOA 0.17 long, front width 0.16, back width 0.22. Leg measurements: I 3.70 (0.96 + 0.39 + 1.02 + 0.89 + 0.44); II 3.12 (0.82 + 0.32 + 0.76 + 0.74 +0.48); III 2.94 (0.78 + 0.32 + 0.57 + 0.76 + 0.51); IV 4.26 (1.09 + 0.40 + 0.91 + 1.18 + 0.68). Leg spination: see Table 1.</p><p>Abdomen with a longitudinal black stripe. Carapace darker than male; other characters as in male.</p><p>Epigyne (Figs 6 E–F, 7A–B). With pair of shallow concavities with conspicuous anterior margins, concealing slightly expanded copulatory openings; copulatory ducts relatively long, connected to two oval transparent bursae, bursae with spherical, sclerotized base; spermathecae small and spherical, close together, in same horizontal plane as copulatory openings; bursae and spermathecae connected by short tube.</p><p>Distribution. Known from three localities in south-western Hainan (Fig. 8).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A187F8FFC79E20FF2D717079010132	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Jin, Chi;Fu, Jianying;Zhang, Feng	Jin, Chi, Fu, Jianying, Zhang, Feng (2015): A review of the genus Abdosetae (Araneae: Phrurolithidae) from China. Zootaxa 4007 (1): 91-103, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4007.1.6
