taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
03AE6A28AD3B574AFF31FBC3FB52F9D9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13718462/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13718462	FIGURE 1. Phylogenetic tree derived from maximum parsimony analysis of the combined ITS, GAPDH, CHS-1, HIS3 ACT and TUB2 sequences of C. acutatum species complex, using C. orchidophilum CBS 632.80* as outgroup. Bootstrap values of more than 70 from 1000 replications are shown above the respective branches. Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) were estimated and clades with PP> 0.95 are marked under the branches. The newly sequenced C. rhombiforme is in bold.	FIGURE 1. Phylogenetic tree derived from maximum parsimony analysis of the combined ITS, GAPDH, CHS-1, HIS3 ACT and TUB2 sequences of C. acutatum species complex, using C. orchidophilum CBS 632.80* as outgroup. Bootstrap values of more than 70 from 1000 replications are shown above the respective branches. Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) were estimated and clades with PP> 0.95 are marked under the branches. The newly sequenced C. rhombiforme is in bold.	2019-03-04	Wang, Qiu-Tong;Liu, Xiao-Ting;Ma, Hai-Ying;Shen, Xiao-Ye;Hou, Cheng-Lin		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Qiu-Tong;Liu, Xiao-Ting;Ma, Hai-Ying;Shen, Xiao-Ye;Hou, Cheng-Lin			
03AE6A28AD3B5749FF31F9A7FE93FE5B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13718464/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13718464	FIGURE 2. Phylogenetic tree derived from maximum parsimony analysis of the combined ACT, CAL, CHS-1, GAPDH, ITS, TUB2 and GS genes of C. gloeosporioides species complex, using C. boninense MAFF 305972* and C. hippeastri CBS 241.78* as outgroups. Bootstrap values of more than 70 from 1000 replications are shown above the respective branches. Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) were estimated and clades with PP> 0.95 are marked under the branches. The new species, Colletotrichum yulongense, is in bold.	FIGURE 2. Phylogenetic tree derived from maximum parsimony analysis of the combined ACT, CAL, CHS-1, GAPDH, ITS, TUB2 and GS genes of C. gloeosporioides species complex, using C. boninense MAFF 305972* and C. hippeastri CBS 241.78* as outgroups. Bootstrap values of more than 70 from 1000 replications are shown above the respective branches. Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) were estimated and clades with PP> 0.95 are marked under the branches. The new species, Colletotrichum yulongense, is in bold.	2019-03-04	Wang, Qiu-Tong;Liu, Xiao-Ting;Ma, Hai-Ying;Shen, Xiao-Ye;Hou, Cheng-Lin		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Qiu-Tong;Liu, Xiao-Ting;Ma, Hai-Ying;Shen, Xiao-Ye;Hou, Cheng-Lin			
03AE6A28AD3B5749FF31F9A7FE93FE5B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13718466/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13718466	FIGURE 3. Result of the pairwise homoplasy index (PHI) test of closely related species using both LogDet transformation and splits decomposition. PHI test results (Φ w) <0.05 indicate significant recombination within the dataset.	FIGURE 3. Result of the pairwise homoplasy index (PHI) test of closely related species using both LogDet transformation and splits decomposition. PHI test results (Φ w) <0.05 indicate significant recombination within the dataset.	2019-03-04	Wang, Qiu-Tong;Liu, Xiao-Ting;Ma, Hai-Ying;Shen, Xiao-Ye;Hou, Cheng-Lin		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Qiu-Tong;Liu, Xiao-Ting;Ma, Hai-Ying;Shen, Xiao-Ye;Hou, Cheng-Lin			
03AE6A28AD365746FF31FA64FD14FECB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13718468/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13718468	FIGURE 4. Colletotrichum yulongense (from ex-holotype) A, B. Upper and reverse sides of cultures on PDA 7 days after inoculation. C. Conidiogenous cells on SNA. D. Seta on PDA. E. Conidia on SNA. F. Appressoria in slide culture. Bars: C–F = 10 μm.	FIGURE 4. Colletotrichum yulongense (from ex-holotype) A, B. Upper and reverse sides of cultures on PDA 7 days after inoculation. C. Conidiogenous cells on SNA. D. Seta on PDA. E. Conidia on SNA. F. Appressoria in slide culture. Bars: C–F = 10 μm.	2019-03-04	Wang, Qiu-Tong;Liu, Xiao-Ting;Ma, Hai-Ying;Shen, Xiao-Ye;Hou, Cheng-Lin		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Qiu-Tong;Liu, Xiao-Ting;Ma, Hai-Ying;Shen, Xiao-Ye;Hou, Cheng-Lin			
03AE6A28AD375746FF31FA21FC25F7EB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13718470/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13718470	FIGURE 5. Colletotrichum rhombiforme (CFCC 50823) A, B. Upper and reverse sides of cultures on PDA 7 days after inoculation. C. Conidiogenous cells on SNA. D. Seta on PDA. E. Appressorium in slide culture. F. Conidia on SNA. Bars: C–F = 10 μm.	FIGURE 5. Colletotrichum rhombiforme (CFCC 50823) A, B. Upper and reverse sides of cultures on PDA 7 days after inoculation. C. Conidiogenous cells on SNA. D. Seta on PDA. E. Appressorium in slide culture. F. Conidia on SNA. Bars: C–F = 10 μm.	2019-03-04	Wang, Qiu-Tong;Liu, Xiao-Ting;Ma, Hai-Ying;Shen, Xiao-Ye;Hou, Cheng-Lin		Zenodo	biologists	Wang, Qiu-Tong;Liu, Xiao-Ting;Ma, Hai-Ying;Shen, Xiao-Ye;Hou, Cheng-Lin			
