taxonID	type	description	language	source
03ACA32BFFB4FF962C0913D2FD8DFA45.taxon	description	Recognition. Harpalini, subtribe Harpalina, beetles with the characteristic series of setigerous punctures in elytral striae 2 and 5 or in striae 2, 5, and 7.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFB4FF962C0913D2FD8DFA45.taxon	discussion	Remarks. The supergenus Selenophori in subtribe Harpalina was first proposed by van Emden (1953), who studied the Neotropical Harpalini. This genus-group, also known collectively as the “ selenophorines ”, was expanded to the world fauna by Noonan (1976: 41, 1985 a, b) who provided a diagnosis for the group based on critical analyses of character states. The selenophorine genera are distinguished in identification keys for the world fauna by Noonan (1985 a), the Neotropical Region by Reichardt (1977), the Nearctic Region by Ball and Bousquet (2000), and the West Indies by Shpeley et al. (2017). See recent summaries of the Nearctic Selenophori by Ball and Bousquet (2000: 91, 95) and the West Indian Selenophori by Shpeley et al. (2017: 11). Within the tribe Harpalini, the stenolophine beetle Philodes alternans (LeConte) of eastern USA and Canada exhibits series of setigerous punctures associated with elytral striae 2, 5, and 7. This species is readily distinguished from the selenophorines by its depressed habitus, reduced eyes, and much longer seriate setae.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFB7FF902FD9115BFDECFC72.taxon	description	(Fig. 73)	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFB7FF902FD9115BFDECFC72.taxon	description	Range. USA: AR, LA, MS, TX; Mexico.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFB7FF902FD9115BFDECFC72.taxon	discussion	Remarks. The transfer of this species to genus Athrostictus was attributed to “ TLE ” in Reichardt (1977: 428). The initials apparently refer to Terry L. Erwin, an authority on New World Caraboidea. However, Erwin (personal communication, 2016) did not recall having considered such a nomenclatural change in the past. It was retained in the genus Selenophorus by both Noonan (1985 a) and Lorenz (2005), although the two authors did not study the relevant specimens. Ball and Bousquet (2000) accepted the combination Athrostictus punctatulus based on its elytra densely and evenly punctate but without associated setae. Bousquet (2012) established Selenophorus perpolitus Casey as a synonym and stated that the systematic position of A. punctatulus was not quite settled. Casey (1914) noted that Hemisopalus differed from Athrostictus by the lesser degree of punctation on the elytra without comparing the extent of setation. However, Noonan (1985 a) stated that the most important diagnostic requirement for Athrostictus is that the elytra be entirely setose. We concur that the species names of Putzeys (1878 a) and Casey (1884, 1914) are conspecific, and the elytra are described as densely covered with non-setigerous punctures. Placement of this species in Selenophorus would therefore appear to be natural. However, G. E. Ball and D. Shpeley believed that this species is a member of Athrostictus (personal communication, 2016). They cited close similarities to the dorsally-setose species Athrostictus paganus (Dejean) [= Athrostictus pubifer (Putzeys)] known in the West Indies and South America. These two species are alike in habitus, in body size, and in iridescent elytra densely covered with punctules. The only apparent difference is that each dorsal punctule bears a conspicuous seta in A. paganus, but bears no such seta (even under high magnification) in A. punctatulus. Furthermore, the male genitalia are similar in phallic form and in the endophallus exhibiting rows of densely packed spines. The foregoing structural similarities provide sufficient evidence to retain the combination Athrostictus punctatulus. Unlike the 17 other known species of Athrostictus that are clearly hirsute, A. punctatulus has the distinction of being dorsally glabrous.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFB1FF902FCD136CFC32F98A.taxon	description	(Fig. 74)	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFB1FF902FCD136CFC32F98A.taxon	description	Additional Description. Dorsum black; elytra with faint greenish metallic luster; legs dark brown or black, except for some tarsi paler. Pronotum moderately to strongly convex; sides evenly arcuate; disc convexity extends evenly to posteriolateral margin; deplanate areas absent; hind angles broadly rounded; disc and basal impressions impunctate. Microsculpture mesh on pronotum and elytra irregularly isodiametric to slightly transverse. Elytral intervals impunctate or with inconspicuous micropunctules. Sexual dimorphism + ♂ 1 — ♀ 2. Median lobe with prominent transverse lip apically on dorsoapical plate. Endophallus featureless. ABL 6.0 – 7.8 mm. Range. Bousquet (2012) reported that this rare species is known only from southeastern Texas. We examined specimens from the southeastern counties of Cameron, Hidalgo, Jim Wells, and Nueces. Additional specimens extend the species range to northeastern Texas (Tarrant Co.) and western Texas (Ward Co.).	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFB1FF902FCD136CFC32F98A.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Casey (1914) included this species in his key to Hemisopalus. However, with the dorsum impunctate and distinctly microsculptured, it would have been better placed by Casey near S. pedicularius in his key to Selenophorus. The combination with Discoderus was originally suggested to us by G. E. Ball (personal communication, 2015). Analogously, four precinctive West Indian species historically assigned to Selenophorus were treated as Discoderus by Shpeley et al. (2017). These additions to Discoderus increase the checklist in Lorenz (2005) to 33 species.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFB0FF912E01128DFC7FF9B2.taxon	description	shape typically elliptical (Amara - like) with pronotal base broad. Dorsum uniformly brownish-black to black with well-impressed microsculpture (isodiametric to slightly transverse). Prosternal process narrow, straight, and marginate (five species) OR stout, curved dorsally, and immarginate (three species) as seen in all members of subgenus Selenophorus. Metatarsi have dorsal pubescence very short and very sparse (six species) OR long and dense (two species) as seen in many members of subgenus Selenophorus. Metatarsi nearly as long as metatibiae. Males have the common single pair of anal setae. Females have a single pair of anal setae (six species) OR two pairs of anal setae (two species) as seen in all members of subgenus Selenophorus. Male genitalia with a lamina in the ostium of the median lobe as seen in two species of subgenus Selenophorus.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFB3FF922FD01333FBD7F915.taxon	description	Range. USA: AL *, FL, MS; West Indies; Nicaragua; Argentina; Bolivia *; Brazil; Colombia, Peru; Venezuela.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFB3FF922FD01333FBD7F915.taxon	discussion	Remarks. The known geographical range of S. discopunctatus is disjunct. It includes southeastern USA, several countries in South America, and much of the West Indies, but is apparently not present in Mexico and Central America. Selenophorus yucatanus Putzeys (1878 a: 24), of the Yucatan Peninsula (type area) and the Lesser Antilles (Shpeley et al. 2017), is similar in appearance and potentially sympatric. As members of the discopunctatus species group, both species have the basal one third of the pronotum densely punctate which in S. yucatanus includes coarser longitudinal rugae that are most distinct posteriomedially. Additionally, S. yucatanus has larger (foveate) seriate punctures, greater average ABL in the Mexican populations (at least 8 mm), and the median lobe is with endophallus unarmed and the apex is without a prominent hook (Shpeley et al. 2017).	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFB2FF932FE11275FCE7FAC0.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Several nominal species of the ellipticus species group are associated with the type locality in Southern Pines, Moore County, North Carolina, thanks to the prolific collecting of Coleoptera by the Reverend A. H. Manee (1858 – 1927). They are S. contractus, S. municeps (new synonym of S. ellipticus), and S. nanulus (new synonym of S. granarius). A few specimens of the new species S. nonellipticus (type locality in Osceola County, Florida) were collected by Manee in Southern Pines. Selenophorus blanchardi of the pedicularius species group was also described from this type locality.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFB2FF8C2C1312F5FDF4FACC.taxon	description	Range. USA: AL *, FL *, GA, NC.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFADFF8D2FED12F7FD0EF9A9.taxon	description	(Fig. 2)	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFADFF8D2FED12F7FD0EF9A9.taxon	description	Range. CAN: ON; USA: AL, AR, CT, DC, FL, GA, IA, IL, IN, KS, LA, MA, MD, ME, MI, MN, MO, MS, NC, NE, NH, NJ,? NM, NY, OH, OK, PA, RI, SC, TN, TX, VA, WI; Mexico.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFADFF8D2FED12F7FD0EF9A9.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Examination of the two female syntypes (USNM # 47878) of Celiamorphus municeps [collector “ Manee ” = A. H. Manee, type locality in Southern Pines, North Carolina] established synonymy with S. ellipticus. The ABL’ s were 5.9 and 6.0 mm, longer than the 5.4 mm reported by Casey. Selenophorus ellipticus and S. granarius are mostly sympatric and frequently confused because of their superficial similarity. The two species are distinguished in the identification key. The following additional characters are useful. Compared to S. granarius, the elytra of S. ellipticus have the seriate punctures much smaller; ABS 1 longer, well impressed; luster duller (especially in females), closer to black, less aeneous; microsculpture mesh much finer, almost isodiametric. In S. granarius males the elytral mesh is particularly shiny, more open and somewhat stretched while in females the mesh is duller, finer, near isodiametric like that of S. ellipticus. Comparing the lateral edges to the basal edges of the metanepisterna, S. ellipticus has metanepisterna longer (ratio almost 2: 1) and narrower posteriad. The antennomeres of S. ellipticus are proportionately longer, at least twice as long as wide.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFACFF8E2C151168FE83F911.taxon	description	Range. USA: AL, CT, FL, GA, IA, IL, IN, MA, MD, MI *, MS, NC, NJ,? NM, NY, RI, TN *, TX, VA, WI *; Mexico.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFACFF8E2C151168FE83F911.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Synonymy of Celiamorphus adjunctus with S. granarius is based on our study of photographs taken of the dorsal habitus and card-mounted aedeagus of one type specimen held in the Casey collection (USNM) labeled “ Galveston ” [Galveston County in southeastern Texas]. The median lobe showed the diagnostic swollen apex strongly sloped dorsad. Celiamorphus subtropicus is known only from the type series in “ Texas and northern Mexico ”. We treat it as a synonym of S. granarius based on only subtle external differences described by Casey and our failure to find convincing examples among vast Texas material available to us. Photographs of a type specimen in the Casey collection (USNM) provided support for our conclusion. The aedeagus was not examined. Our examination of the two male syntypes (USNM # 47877) of Celiamorphus nanulus [collector “ Manee ” = A. H. Manee, type locality in Southern Pines, North Carolina] established synonymy with S. granarius. An aedeagus glued to one of the card points exhibited the distinctive swollen and sloped apex. Their measured ABL range 4.8 – 4.9 mm is longer than the range “ 4.4 – 4.6 mm ” reported by Casey. Three typical examples of S. granarius, with dissected aedeagi in two, are held in WIRC also bearing the labels “ Southern Pines, A. H. Manee, NC, V- 4 - 1914 ”. Their ABL range measured 5.0 – 5.5 mm. Populations of S. granarius with small body size are not limited to the type locality, as four examples from Newton County, Indiana (FSCA) measured 4.7 – 5.5 mm.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFAFFF8F2DB717B7FB67FEE9.taxon	materials_examined	Type Material. Holotype male [deposited in CMNH] labeled “ FLORIDA Osceola County / Disney Wilderness Preserve / 19 m N 28.0997 W 81.4000 Pitfall / trap 07 Jul 2015. RNelson / DSNY 004. W. 205150707 // Selenophorus ellipticus / det. E. Cayata / 2015 // BET. D 03.000529 // NATIONAL ECOLOGICAL / OBSERVATORY NETWORK / (NEON) 2017 / CMNH Acc. No. 38.693 ”; pinned with holotype label [red paper topmost] and genitalia in glycerin vial. Paratypes [yellow paper] as follows. USA: [deposited in CMNH unless stated otherwise] ALABAMA: Bibb Co.: Talladega Natl Forest, N 32.9578832 W 87.432827, 3 V 2017 (1 ♀). FLORIDA: Alachua Co.: 3.4 mi WNW Archer, pitfall trap, 25 IX – 29 X 2015 (1 ♀ FSCA); Baker Co.: Glen St. Mary, under log, 1 II 1961 (1 ♂ FSCA); Dade Co.: Miami, Metro Zoo Pinelands, 5 m, 25 ° 37.3 0 N, 80 ° 23.5 0 W: 2 X 2008 (7 ♂ 4 ♀ CMNH, 1 ♂ 1 ♀ PWMC, 2 ♀ BTRC), 15 X 2009 (2 ♂ CMNH, 1 ♂ BTRC), 21 X 2009 (3 ♂ 1 ♀), 14 XII 2011 (1 ♀); Liberty Co.: Torreya State Park, UV light, 4 VI 1994 (2 ♂ CMNH, 2 ♂ PWMC); Polk Co.: Disney Wilderness Preserve, pitfall [vicinity of holotype]: 2 VII 2013 (2 ♂ 2 ♀), 30 VII 2013 (1 ♂ 2 ♀, 1 ♀ PWMC), 13 VIII 2013 (1 ♀), 24 IX 2013 (1 ♂), 1 V 2014 (1 ♂), 14 V 2014 (4 ♀), 29 V 2014 (1 ♂), 26 VI 2014 (1 ♀ CMNH, 1 ♀ BTRC), 6 VIII 2014 (1 ♀ CMNH, 1 ♀ DAHC), 9 VI 2015 (1 ♀); 31 V 2016 (1 ♀), 18 IV 2017 (1 ♀), 16 V 2017 (1 ♀), 30 V 2017 (1 ♀), 8 VIII 2017 (2 ♂), 5 IX 2017 (1 ♂ 1 ♀); Okaloosa Co.: 2 mi N Holt, 6 III 1980 (1 ♀ FSCA); Osceola Co.: Disney Wilderness Preserve, pitfall [vicinity of holotype]: 7 VII 2015 (1 ♂), 21 VII 2015 (1 ♂), 4 VIII 2015 (1 ♀); Putnam Co.: Ordway-Swisher Biol Stn.: 2 VI 2016 (1 ♀), 20 IV 2017 (1 ♂), 4 V 2017 (2 ♀); Santa Rosa Co.: 2 mi N Muson, beaten from oak Quercus sp., 23 IV 2016 (1 ♀ FSCA). GEORGIA: Dade Co.: Sitton’ s Gulch, 16 VII 1936 (2 ♂ UGCA). NORTH CAROLINA: Moore Co.: Southern Pines, A. H. Manee [collector], 22 IV 1915 (1 ♂ 2 ♀ WIRC); 5 mi SW Southern Pines, 24 III 2005 (1 ♂ PWMC). SOUTH CAROLINA: Aiken Co.: Aiken, SRP S- Area Bay, 19 VI 1979 (1 ♂ UGCA).	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFAFFF8F2DB717B7FB67FEE9.taxon	description	Description (Holotype). Adult male. Size: ABL 6.6 mm. Color / Luster: Dorsal and ventral surfaces black. Pronotum moderately shiny, elytra much duller. Mouthparts and antennomeres 1 – 3 rufopiceous, distally darker. Femora and trochanters piceous, legs distally not as dark. Microsculpture: Dorsal mesh strongly impressed, irregularly isodiametric, weaker on frons and near midline of pronotum. Head: HW / PW = 0.70. Pronotum: PL / PW = 0.60. Impunctate, glabrous. As wide as elytra, widest near middle, sides evenly arcuate posteriorly toward broad base, hind angles obtuse, rounded at apices. Anterior angles strongly projected, their span as wide as pronotal base. Bilateral basal impressions shallow, wide, delimited on disc by weakly engraved line. Elytra: Seriate setigerous punctures in striae 2, 5, and 7 prominent but not foveate. ABS 1 well impressed, short, not longer than the maximum width of elytral interval 2. Venter: Prosternal process narrow, straight, marginate. Ventrites with pubescence sparse, short. Ventrite 6 with 1 pair of anal setae. Legs: Male protarsi and mesotarsi typical of genus. Metatarsi long, dorsally with very sparse, very short pubescence. Median lobe: Apex of dorsoapical plate abruptly swollen, with bilobed hook dorsally. Distal half of endophallus with three long parallel rows of contiguous slender spines. Ostium with elongated lamina. Variation. ABL 5.8 – 7.0 mm. Endophallus with the dense rows of slender spines variable in their lengths and positions; some with a bilateral pair of rows behind bulb and a single left-sided row near middle of median lobe. Females with tarsi unmodified and 1 pair of anal setae as in males.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFAFFF8F2DB717B7FB67FEE9.taxon	etymology	Etymology. The species name is derived from Latin non (not) and Greek masculine adjective ellipticus, in reference to the distinction from the similar species Selenophorus ellipticus.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFAFFF8F2DB717B7FB67FEE9.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Selenophorus nonellipticus is distinguished from other members of the S. ellipticus species group by the characteristics given in the key. It differs externally from similar S. ellipticus by the dark femora; proportionately larger head; pronotum widest in middle with less constriction anteriorly; elytra with larger seriate punctures.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFAFFF8F2DB717B7FB67FEE9.taxon	materials_examined	Type Habitat. The holotype was collected at the Nature Conservancy’ s 11,500 - acre Disney Wilderness Preserve near Kissimmee, Florida. This preserve is located at the head of the Greater Everglades watershed and contains 3,500 acres of restored wetlands.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFAFFF8F2DB717B7FB67FEE9.taxon	discussion	Remarks. The similarity of S. nonellipticus to S. ellipticus was anticipated by Lindroth (1968: 829) in his brief characterization of an undescribed species from North Carolina. Lindroth’ s undescribed species clearly matches S. nonellipticus whose range is much of southeastern United States. Selenophorus ovalis Dejean, 1829 sensu Horn (1880: 179, 182) is likely S. nonellipticus. Horn studied specimens from Georgia and Florida without indicating that he examined types. Horn concluded that S. ovalis was a species near S. ellipticus with the pronotal anterior and posterior margins about equally wide, with elytral seriate punctures larger, and with the legs piceous. Putzeys (1878 a: 20) examined one male specimen of S. ovalis in the Dejean collection. Putzeys observed that the legs in S. ovalis are “ brunes ” (brown) while those of S. ellipticus are testaceous. Otherwise, Putzeys’ comparative description is difficult to interpret. Lindroth (1968) examined the male type of S. ovalis including its genitalia and concluded that it was only a large specimen of S. ellipticus.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFAEFF8F2C171539FBB3FC1D.taxon	description	Range. USA: AL, FL, GA, MS, NC.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFAEFF892DE013F2FD94FD28.taxon	materials_examined	Type Material. Holotype male [deposited in CAS] labeled “ MEX. Sinaloa, / 26 mi N. Pericos, / VIII- 13 - 60 // P. H. ARNAUD, JH. / E. S. ROSS / D. C. RENTZ // Collection of the / CALIFORNIA ACADEMY / OF SCIENCES, San / Francisco, Calif. // CASTYPE 20039 ”; pinned with holotype label [red paper topmost] and genitalia in glycerin vial. Paratypes [yellow paper] as follows. USA: ARIZONA: Santa Cruz Co.: Duquense Road, on ground at night, WGS 84 31.3658 — 110.7751, Elv. 1330 m, 14 VII 2013 (1 ♀ PWMC). MEXICO: Jalisco: Mpio., LaHuerta, Chamela Biol. Sta., 27 VII 1996 (1 ♂ 1 ♀ TAMU); Chamela Biol. Sta., 22 – 23 VI 2013 (1 ♀ CMNH); Nayarit: Acaponeta, 15 VIII 1960 (1 ♂ CAS); Oaxaca: 2.7 mi. nw. El Cameron, at light, 24 VII 1973 (1 ♀ TAMU); 6 km E Pinatepa near river, 16 VIII 1986 (1 ♂ CMNH); Sinaloa: 6 mi S. Culiacan, blacklite, 29 VIII 1964 (1 ♀ MPM); Mazatlan, at blacklite, 17 VIII 1965 (2 ♂ MPM); Sonora: Alamos, 12 VIII 1960 (8 ♂ 22 ♀ CAS, 1 ♂ 1 ♀ BTRC, 1 ♂ DAHC, 2 ♂ 1 ♀ PWMC); 7.2 mi E. Alamos, 24 VIII 1964 (2 ♂ 1 ♀ UASM); Hermosillo, 9 – 16 VII 1953 (1 ♂ 1 ♀ CAS); San Bernardino, Rio Mayo, 27 VI 1935 (2 ♀ CAS). NICARAGUA: Masaya Dist., Las Flores, “ Jun 1993 ” (5 ♂ 7 ♀ CMNH). COSTA RICA: Guanacaste Prov. Est. Santa Rosa, Guanacaste Conservation Area, 300 m, LN 313000 - 359300, at lights, 1 – 4 V 1995 (1 ♀ CMNH).	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFAEFF892DE013F2FD94FD28.taxon	description	Description (Holotype). Adult male. Size: ABL 3.9 mm. Color / Luster: Dorsum shiny; head near black; pronotum, elytra, venter coppery dark brown. Mouthparts, antennomeres 1 – 3, proepipleura, elytral epipleura, pronotal lateral margins (very narrowly), and legs testaceous. Microsculpture: Dorsal mesh well impressed, open, transversely stretched (2: 1) on pronotum disc and elytra. Mesh irregularly isodiametric on head, and basal and apical areas of pronotum. Head: HW / PW = 0.73. Pronotum: PL / PW = 0.64. Impunctate, glabrous. Sides narrowly rounded posteriorly to rather sharp obtuse hind angles. Base as wide as elytral base. Anterior angles weakly projected forward. Bilateral basal impressions linear, shallow, impunctate. Elytra: Impunctate, glabrous, widest behind the middle. Intervals flat to slightly convex. Seriate setigerous punctures in striae 2, 5, and 7 of moderate size. ABS 1 absent. Venter: Prosternal process curved dorsally, immarginate. Ventrites with sparse, short pubescence. Ventrite 6 with 1 pair of anal setae. Legs: Male protarsi and mesotarsi only slightly dilated, otherwise typical of genus. Metatarsi long, dorsally with sparse, short pubescence. Median lobe: Ostium with an elongated, very thin lamina with spatulate distal end in dorsal view. Dorsoapical plate evenly narrowed to subacute apex, dorsal lip minute. The aedeagal sclerotic ring at its proximal end with a node-like projection. Endophallus unarmed. Variation. ABL 3.7 – 5.0 mm. ABS 1 absent to short. In nine males from northwestern states in Mexico the character states of small spines in the endophallic midsection varied greatly: no spines (n = 3, including holotype); 1 right-sided spine (n = 1); 1 spine in each half (n = 1); packed spines in bilateral bands of variable length (n = 4). A single male from Oaxaca in southern Mexico had long bilateral bands of small spines densely packed. In all Nicaraguan males (n = 3) the endophallus was unarmed. Females are with tarsi unmodified and 2 pairs of anal setae.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFAEFF892DE013F2FD94FD28.taxon	etymology	Etymology. The species name is derived from Latin masculine adjective pumilus, in reference to the dwarfed body size.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFAEFF892DE013F2FD94FD28.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Among the Nearctic Celiamorphus, S. pumilus is distinguished by the following combination: prosternal process dorsally curved and immarginate; small size (ABL <5 mm); coppery luster; transverse microsculpture of pronotum and elytra; known range southern Arizona to Central America.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFAEFF892DE013F2FD94FD28.taxon	materials_examined	Type Habitat. The holotype was collected in seasonal dry tropical forest within the western foothills of the Sierra Madre Occidental in Sinaloa, Mexico. This area, ca. 26 miles north of Pericos, is characterized by woody vegetation (e. g., Bursera, Lysiloma, Jatropha, Juliania, Ceiba) typical of this region and semiarid conditions including extended dry periods averaging 7.6 months and average annual rainfall of 450 mm (Trejo and Dirzo 2002). The holotype was collected during the peak of the rainy season.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFAEFF892DE013F2FD94FD28.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Selenophorus pusio Putzeys (1878 a: 53), known only by the male holotype (MNHN) from Venezuela, is similarly small and coppery but it differs from S. pumilus by being shorter (3.7 mm); pronotal base wider; hind angles sharply rectangular; presence of punctules uniformly distributed across pronotal base and elytral intervals; elytra widest before the middle. The aedeagus was not available for study. Lorenz (2005) listed S. pusio under subgenus Celiamorphus likely on the basis of the typographical error “ C. pusio ” by Putzeys, well before Casey established Celiamorphus in 1914. Nevertheless, based on the original descriptive account and our study of a dorsal habitus image of the type specimen, we are provisionally treating S. pusio as a member of the S. pumilus species group. Using phylogenetic methods, Ball and Maddison (1987: 307) analyzed a character state matrix for three laminate groups in subgenus Celiamorphus. They are the seriatoporus group, the ellipticus group, and the amaroides group, which have in common an elongated plate (lamina) in the median lobe ostium. The authors examined representatives of “ S. nr. amaroides Dejean ” among the taxa studied. The amaroides group was characterized (in part) as follows: smallest body size (SBL <6.2 mm), elytral microsculpture stretched transversely, prosternal process ridged, endophallus unarmed with a broad lamina. The first two stated characters fit S. pumilus, but its prosternal process is not ridged and the endophallus has a narrow lamina with spines sometimes present. With those differences in mind, we propose that S. pumilus be placed in its own species group under Celiamorphus. True Selenophorus amaroides Dejean (1829: 89) is a little known Celiamorphus limited to French Guiana (type locality: Cayenne), Surinam, and the Amazon. It does have the marginate prosternal process as required by the amaroides group, but it is uncharacteristically large with ABL 9 1 / 3 mm (Putzeys 1878 a). Despite its epithet, this species may not have been the intended name bearer for the amaroides group sensu Ball and Maddison (1987). Danny Shpeley (UASM, personal communication, 2017) initially treated S. pumilus as an undescribed Celiamorphus of the S. amaroides group (sensu UASM specimens determined by G. Ball) during his early stage of a beetle survey of Sonora, Mexico. Accordingly, we encountered Mexican specimens of S. pumilus in some institutional collections that were determined by D. Shpeley or G. Ball to be either “ Selenophorus amaroides ” or “ Selenophorus amaroides sp. grp. ” It was not clear to us whether “ amaroides ” had been a provisional name for these specimens based on their superficial resemblance to small Amara, or whether the specimens had been given a deeper connection to the amaroides group described by Ball and Maddison (1987).	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFA8FF892DF6161FFBD1F994.taxon	description	Gynandropus (sensu lato) is equivalent to the S. hylacis species group. It is characterized by the ventral surface of metatarsomere 1 with inner setae densely packed in a single brush-like row. Except for one species, the females in this group are with protarsomere 1 markedly dilated with a ventral pad of dense vestiture. Hemisopalus (sensu lato) is characterized by the disc of the pronotum with microsculpture either absent or at most weakly impressed. Frequently the elytra are extensively and finely punctulate. Hemisopalus encompasses the S. concinnus species group, S. opalinus species group, S. ruficollis species group, and S. striatopunctatus species group.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFA8FF892FF31417FBF7FEE9.taxon	description	Range. USA: sTX *; Mexico; Guatemala; Belize *; Honduras *; “ South America ”.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFA8FF892FF31417FBF7FEE9.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Selenophorus seriatoporus occupies a wide geographic range from South America northward to the eastern regions of Mexico. We discovered only a few examples (all females) in southern Texas, USA (new country record). An undescribed species in western Mexico from Guerrero north to Sonora is similar. Given the placeholder name S. seriatoporus species group sp. A, it is conspecific with specimens labeled “ S. seriatoporus species group sp. UASM- 1 ” by G. E. Ball. This undescribed species differs from typical S. seriatoporus by its larger size (ABL 8.8 – 10.0 mm); the elytral seriate punctures are much smaller; the elytra are duller with subgranulate microsculpture most apparent in females; the median lobe is with dorsoapical plate longer, somewhat spatulate, and armed with a single row of six large, slender spines confined to the left half of the endophallus. Until the Mexican fauna is thoroughly reviewed, we prefer not to propose a new scientific name.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFABFF8A2FE417B7FE03FB7D.taxon	description	Range. USA: sKS, cwOK, neTX.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFABFF8A2FE417B7FE03FB7D.taxon	discussion	Remarks. This rare precinctive species was not listed by Noonan (1985 a) in his classification of Selenophori nor has it been redescribed in the literature since Casey (1914: 153) struggled with its taxonomic position. Unlike other selenophorines of the Nearctic, S. breviusculus has its elytra densely covered by setae except for interval 1 which is notably glabrous. It is likely not taxonomically near the setigerous members of Athrostictus based on the simple form of its median lobe and different kind of endophallic armature. In future studies this beetle will likely find placement in a separate monobasic subgenus of Selenophorus (G. E. Ball and D. Shpeley, personal communication, 2016). For our purposes, S. breviusculus is placed in the breviusculus species group under subgenus Selenophorus.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFABFF8A2DF01231FBCFF969.taxon	description	Range. USA: seAZ, wTX *; Mexico *.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFABFF8A2FC51385FB98FA85.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Nearctic members of the concinnus group show considerable interspecific and intraspecific variation in dorsal coloration. Individuals of Selenophorus gagatinus consistently have the dorsum uniformly black. However, conspecific individuals in the other species vary from uniformly dark to bicolored, the latter having the forebodies yellowish to reddishbrown in stark contrast to the dark elytra. The color variations likely contributed to the past confusions in distinguishing S. semirufus and S. s chaefferi. Moreover, we noted that several mature dark specimens of S. semirufus from Texas were mislabeled as the similar species S. gagatinus. The following are three noteworthy Mexican species in the concinnus group. Selenophorus dichromatus (Casey)	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFABFF8A2FC51385FB98FA85.taxon	description	Selenophorus suavis Bates	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFABFF8A2FC51385FB98FA85.taxon	description	Selenophorus tubericauda Bates	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFAAFF8B2E0317B7FE84FA6F.taxon	description	(Fig. 15)	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFAAFF8B2E0317B7FE84FA6F.taxon	description	Range. CAN: NB, NS, ON, QC; USA: AL, AR,? AZ, CT, DC, FL, GA, IL, IN, MA, MD, ME, MI, MO, NC, NH, NJ, NY, OH, OK, PA, RI, SC, TN *,? TX, VA, VT, WI, WV.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFAAFF8B2E0317B7FE84FA6F.taxon	discussion	Remarks. This species is distinguished from similar dark specimens of S. semirufus by the following characters: pronotum strongly convex with convexity extending to hind angles, this area often flattish in S. semirufus; lateral sides and hind angle areas with microsculpture weakly, indistinctly impressed; forebody consistently black; labrum dark brown to black, not orange or reddish-brown as in S. semirufus; femora much darker than rest of legs. Horn (1880: 181) suggested that Arizona specimens with forebodies rufopiceous were immature S. gagatinus. However, Bousquet (2012) listed Texas as the likely southwestern limit for S. gagatinus, while 19 th century records from southern Arizona needed confirmation. We did not encounter examples of this species from either Arizona or Texas. Light and dark specimens of S. semirufus from Texas and southwestern states were frequently misidentified as S. gagatinus. The literature-based records of S. gagatinus in Texas require confirmation.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFAAFF8B2FBF1284FBF9FACF.taxon	description	Forebody frequently yellowish to reddish-brown. Elytra very dull due to subgranulate microsculpture. Femora constantly yellowish. Basal metatarsomere especially long. Male abdominal apex distinctly emarginate. Median lobe straight in lateral profile, ventral bilateral borders distinctly carinate distally; dorsoapical plate very short, apex rounded to subtruncate, with abrupt ventral hook. Endophallus with 2 long pigmented membranous bands in ostium. ABL: 9.0 – 10.5 mm. Range. USA: sAZ, sCA.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFAAFF8B2FBF1284FBF9FACF.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Bousquet (2012) reported for S. schaefferi the geographic range of southern Arizona to southeastern California and stated that many of those records were previously reported (erroneously) as S. semirufus. Bousquet questioned the Texas record reported in the catalogue by Csiki (1932: 1201) wherein Csiki proposed the name S. schaefferi for S. semirufus Bates, 1882 sensu Schaeffer (1910: 403). By inserting “ non Bates ” after “ S. schaefferi nom. nov. ” in his catalogue, Csiki acknowledged true S. semirufus Bates which received a separate listing in the catalogue. Schaeffer’ s mistaken concept of S. semirufus was aptly assigned by Csiki to S. schaefferi, a species that we agree is quite different. We studied representative specimens of S. schaefferi from southwestern USA that clearly match Schaeffer’ s (1910) description, that is, a large beetle the size of S. opalinus with bright reddish-testaceous forebody against dull black elytra (due to the subgranulate microsculpture). This is to be contrasted with Bates’ (1882) account of a comparatively smaller S. semirufus with forebody colored chestnut-reddish against black elytra silky and shiny (“ dorso sericeonitentibus ”). Curiously, Csiki (1932) also placed Hemisopalus angulatus Casey, 1914 in synonymy with S. schaefferi. Clearly a different species, H. angulatus does not exhibit the characteristic rufous forebody. Ball and Maddison (1987) established that Amblygnathus subtinctus (LeConte, 1867) is the senior synonym of H. angulatus. That taxonomic move likely accounted for the catalogue listing by Lorenz (2005) in which S. schaefferi was placed in junior synonymy with Amblygnathus subtinctus. Selenophorus schaefferi is an uncommon species without known records beyond the states of Arizona and California.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFAAFF842C1C12F3FDE8FEDE.taxon	description	(Fig. 17)	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFAAFF842C1C12F3FDE8FEDE.taxon	description	Range. USA: AZ *, sCA *, CO *, NM *, TX *; Mexico. New country record for USA.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFA5FF852FCB15B3FCDBF90E.taxon	materials_examined	Type Material. Holotype male [deposited in TAMU] labeled: “ USA: TEXAS: Cameron Co. / Laguna Atascosa NWR (site 1) / 26.22375 ° N, 97.35454 ° W / X- 1 - 2008, UV light / J. King & E. Riley- 129 / dense coastal brush // TAMU – ENTO / X 0835226 ”; pinned with holotype label [red paper topmost] and genitalia in glycerin vial. Paratypes [yellow paper] as follows. Capture method is at light, mostly UV light, unless noted otherwise. USA: TEXAS: Cameron Co.: 11 X 1994 (1 ♀ CMNH); 20 X 1997 (1 ♂ TAMU); 19 X 2002 (9 ♂ 6 ♀ TAMU); Brownsville 28 IX 2004 (4 ♂ 7 ♀ CMNH); 3 X 2008 (1 ♂ PWMC, 1 ♀ BTRC); Cameron Co., Laguna Atascosa NWR: 2 IX 2008 (1 ♂ TAMU); 17 IX 2008 (9 ♂ 7 ♀ TAMU); 1 X 2008 (same data as holotype: 14 ♂ 12 ♀ TAMU); 16 — 29 X 2008 (1 ♂ TAMU); 4 IX 2009 (1 ♀ TAMU); 19 IX 2009 (2 ♂ 14 ♀ TAMU); 28 III – 25 IV 2010 (1 ♂ PWMC, 3 ♂ 1 ♀ BTRC); 4 IV 2010 (1 ♀ TAMU); 24 or 25 IV – 15 V 2010 (2 ♂ 4 ♀ PWMC, 5 ♂ 5 ♀ BTRC, 2 ♂ 1 ♀ DAHC, 4 ♂ 4 ♀ USNM); 14 V – 4 VI 2010 (1 ♂ BTRC, 1 ♀ DAHC); 5 VI – 16 VII 2010 (4 ♂ 5 ♀ BTRC); Cameron Co., Sabal Palm Grove: 6 — 7 V 1991 (1 ♂ TAMU); 31 X 1991 (1 ♀ TAMU); 23 IV 1994 (1 ♂ 1 ♀ TAMU); 2 IX 1995 (1 ♂ TAMU); 28 – 29 IX 2004 (1 ♂ 1 ♀ PWMC, 1 ♂ 1 ♀ BTRC); 20 IX – 19 X 2008 (1 ♀ PWMC, 4 ♂ 2 ♀ BTRC); 15 X 2008 (1 ♂ TAMU); 18 X 2008 (2 ♂ 1 ♀ TAMU of which 1 “ beating open, re-vegetated area ”); 18 — 19 X 2008: “ beat tall grass W. bank of resaca ” (1 ♀ PWMC), “ under algal mats N. end resaca ” (1 ♀ BTRC), “ beat dead palm fronds re-vegetated area ” (1 ♂ BTRC); 31 X – 13 XI 2008, “ Lindgren FT palm forest ” (1 ♂ TAMU); 7 III – 4 IV 2009 (1 ♂ BTRC); 25 IV – 29 V 2009 (3 ♂ 3 ♀ PWMC, 13 ♂ 12 ♀ BTRC, 1 ♂ WIRC, 2 ♂ 2 ♀ UTA); 20 V 2009 (1 ♂ TAMU); 29 V – 27 V 1 2009 (2 ♂ 2 ♀ PWMC, 8 ♂ 7 ♀ BTRC); 25 VII – 29 VIII 2009 (2 ♂ 3 ♀ BTRC); 29 VIII – 19 IX 2009 (2 ♀ BTRC); 4 IX 2009 (2 ♂ 2 ♀ TAMU); 19 IX – 10 X 2009 (2 ♀ BTRC); 27 III – 24 IV 2010 (1 ♂ 1 ♀ BTRC); 15 V – 5 VI 2010 (2 ♂ 1 ♀ PWMC, 6 ♀ BTRC); 5 VI – 16 VII 2010 (1 ♂ PWMC, 2 ♂ 6 ♀ BTRC); 16 VII – 7 VIII 2010 (1 ♀ BTRC); Cameron Co., Los Indios Inspection Station: 1 – 28 VIII 2016 (4 ♂ 6 ♀ FSCA); Hidalgo Co., Bentsen RGVSP: 20 IX – 3 X 2008 (4 ♂ 1 ♀ TAMU); 5 IV 2009 (1 ♂ 1 ♀ TAMU, 1 ♂ 1 ♀ PWMC, 1 ♂ BTRC); Hidalgo Co., LRGVNWR: 26 III 2009 (8 ♂ 3 ♀ TAMU); 15 V 2010 (3 ♂ 3 ♀ TAMU); 18 IX 2008 (4 ♂ 4 ♀ TAMU); 21 V 2009 (1 ♂ 3 ♀ TAMU); 12 V 2009 (1 sex? TAMU); 5 IX 2009 (1 ♂ TAMU); 3 VI 2010 (1 ♀ TAMU); 18 — 31 X 2008 (1 sex? TAMU); 2 X 2008 (2 ♂ 3 ♀ TAMU); 4 — 16 X 2008 “ Lindgren FT primary forest ” (1 ♂ TAMU); Hidalgo Co., Santa Ana NWR: 17 X 2008 (4 ♂ 1 ♀ BTRC); 26 IV – 31 V 2009 (1 ♀ TAMU); 31 V – 27 VI 2009 (2 ♀ BTRC); 27 VI – 26 VII 2009 (2 ♂ BTRC); 23 IV – 17 V 2010 (1 ♂ 1 ♀ BTRC); 17 V – 6 VI 2010 (1 ♀ BTRC); Hidalgo Co., Casa Santa Ana B & B: 24 – 25 V 2016 (1 ♀ ACMT); Kleberg Co.: Kingsville, 20 X 1992 (1 ♂ CMNH); San Patricio Co.: Welder Wldf. Ref., 27 IX 1976 (3 ♀ CMNH); Starr Co.: 18 XI 1998 (1 ♀ CMNH); Chapeno, 6 X 2017 (1 ♂ BTRC); Willacy Co.: Raymondville, 12 X 2009 (2 ♂ 5 ♀ CMNH); Zapata Co.: Falcon State Park, 15 X 1985 (1 ♂ CMNH). MEXICO: [following reposited at UASM except where noted] Campeche: 13 – 14 IV 1966 (2 ♂ 1 ♀); Escarcega, 26 VII 1980 (1 ♂ TAMU); Chiapas: 1 IX 1965 (3 ♀); 2 IX 1965 (3 ♂ 1 ♀); 3 IX 1965 (52 ♂ 88 ♀); 4 IX 1965 (1 ♂ 1 ♀); 6 IX 1965 (1 ♀); Colima: 25 VII 1963 (1 ♂); 2 — 3 VIII 1966 (1 ♂); Guerrero: 21 XII 1965 (1 ♀); Jalisco: 10 IX 1969 (1 ♀ CMNH); Morelos: 29 – 30 VI 1966 (5 ♂ 2 ♀), 27 – 29 VII 1976 (2 ♀ TAMU); Nuevo León: 6 — 7 VII 1966 (2 ♀); Oaxaca: Tehuantepec, 11 VII 1956 (1 ♀ CMNH); El Cameron, 21 – 22 VII 1974 (1 ♀ TAMU), Puenta El Grande, 15 VI 2010; San Luis Potos´ı: 16 VI 1963 (2 ♂ 1 ♀); 4, 13, and 3 — 4 X 1965 (9 ♂ 13 ♀); Sinaloa: Las Mochis, 22 VII 1955 (7 ♂ 1 ♀ CMNH), 15 – 20 IX 1962 (27 ♂ 30 ♀); 18 IX 1962 (1 ♀); 28 VIII 1964 (1 ♀ MPM); 31 VIII 1964 (1 ♀ MPM); 2 IX 1964 (1 ♀ MPM); 18 VI 1967 (1 ♂ MPM); Sonora: 24 VIII 1964 (1 ♂ 2 ♀ MPM); 29 VIII 1966 (1 ♀ MPM); Tamaulipas: 3 IX 1964 (1 ♂); 3 VII 1966 (10 ♂ 26 ♀); 4 VII 1966 (1 ♂); 29 – 30 X 1965 (3 ♂ 5 ♀); 11 X 1965 (5 ♂ 5 ♀); 24 – 25 III 1980 (1 ♀ CMNH); 19 III 1992 (1 ♀ TAMU); 30 VII 1993 (1 ♂ TAMU); 26 – 27 VII 1993 (1 ♂ TAMU); Veracruz: 6 III 1966 (3 ♂ 1 ♀); 9 III 1966 (2 ♂ 12 ♀); 9 I 1966 (1 ♀); 8 III 1966 (11 ♂ 13 ♀). NICARAGUA: Managua: 25 X 1993 (4 ♂ 3 ♀ CMNH); 20 XI 1994 (2 ♀ CMNH); 24 XI 1994 (2 ♂ CMNH); 29 XI 1994 (7 ♂ 2 ♀ CMNH); 25 X 1993 (3 ♂ 4 ♀ CMNH); Carazo: 11 – 13 IX 1992 (2 ♂ 10 ♀ CMNH); Bioreserva Chococente, 11 – 13 IX 1993 (2 ♂ 2 ♀ CMNH); Masaya: XI 1992 (2 ♀ CMNH); Las Flores “ Jun 1993 ” (31 ♂ 49 ♀ CMNH).	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFA5FF852FCB15B3FCDBF90E.taxon	description	Description (Holotype). Adult male. Size: ABL 4.2 mm. Color / Luster: Dorsum shiny black, except for lateral margins of pronotum narrowly testaceous. Labrum, palpi testaceous. Mandibles testaceous basally, piceous distally. Antennomeres 1 — 2 testaceous, remainder piceous. Legs testaceous. Venter shiny piceous; epipleura of pronotum and elytra lighter. Elytra faintly iridescent. Microsculpture: Head with mesh finely isodiametric, nearly obsolete. Pronotum with mesh transverse, fine, nearly obsolete. Elytra with mesh distinct, open, moderately transverse. Ventrites with mesh irregularly isodiametric, more transverse medially. Head: HW / PW = 0.78. Width slightly greater than width across pronotal apices. Eyes large and strongly convex. Pronotum: PL / PW = 0.71. Cordate with base markedly narrower than elytra; widest well before middle. Sides strongly curved anteriorly to anterior angles, moderately produced; sides nearly straight posteriorly to distinct obtuse angles. Bilateral basal impressions deep with fine rugae and suggestion of sparse punctules. Base otherwise impunctate. Elytra: Seriate punctures in striae 2, 5, and 7 typical size for the genus. ABS 1 absent. Intervals moderately convex with sparse micropunctules. Venter: Prosternal process like that of subgenus. Ventrites with sparse, short pubescence. Ventrite 6 with 2 pairs of anal setae. Legs: Basal metatarsomere ventrally with inner single row of dense setae, brush-like. Male protarsi and mesotarsi only slightly dilated, otherwise typical of genus. Median lobe: Narrow, distal two-thirds nearly straight in lateral view. Dorsoapical plate short with sides gradually narrowed toward rounded tip bearing thin transverse lip, minutely hooked. Endophallus with dark, dense macular fields of illdefined scales: a pair distally in ostium and 1 toward right side just behind middle. A bilateral pair of long dark reticular fields more or less defined in proximal half of endophallus. Variation. ABL 3.8 – 5.0 mm. The endophallus in some lack distinct scaly macules. Females with protarsi and mesotarsi unmodified; with 2 pairs of anal setae as in males.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFA5FF852FCB15B3FCDBF90E.taxon	etymology	Etymology. The specific name honors George E. Ball (1926 – 2019), Professor Emeritus, University of Alberta, who recognized this beetle (“ UASM- 16 ”) as an undescribed member of Selenophorus / Gynandropus among a myriad of other selenophorines that he had studied. The first author fondly recalls the mentorship and generosity that George Ball provided during several years of correspondence.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFA5FF852FCB15B3FCDBF90E.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Selenophorus balli is distinguished externally from other Nearctic members of the hylacis species group (Gynandropus sensu lato) by unmodified protarsi in females; ABS 1 absent; pronotum cordate; base impunctate; hind angles obtuse.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFA5FF852FCB15B3FCDBF90E.taxon	materials_examined	Type Habitat. Selenophorus balli was the most common Selenophorus collected during the twoyear LRGV beetle survey project (2008 – 2010) that is referred to in the introduction (Table 5). The holotype was collected at Laguna Atascosa National Wildlife Refuge in the Lower Rio Grande Valley (LRGV) region of south Texas. The refuge encompasses 98,000 acres bordering the Lower Laguna Madre. Habitat consists of freshwater wetlands, coastal prairies, salt marsh, mudflats, and dense Tamaulipan thorn scrub forests rising from unique wind-blown silty-clay dunes called “ lomas ”. The refuge is uniquely located at the convergence of temperate, subtropical, coastal, and Chihuahuan desert habitats. Specimens were obtained from an ultraviolet light trap suspended from a tree at the loma-freshwater wetland margin (Fig. 74). Additional associated Selenophorus species collected, including three new species, were S. elytrostictus, S. fatuus, S. maritimus, S. palliatus, S. rileyi, S. striatopunctatus, and S. undatus. Paratype data labels variously cite dense coastal brush, palm forest, palm forest margin, resaca bank, re-vegetated site, primary forest, in bromeliads, ebony-guayacan association, motel (at light).	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFA5FF852FCB15B3FCDBF90E.taxon	discussion	Remarks. The elytra of S. balli exhibit moderately transverse microsculpture (Fig. 28), but the mesh is not sufficiently striate (dense parallel spacing) to produce the strong iridescence seen in the S. striatopunctatus species group (Fig. 68) or the S. opalinus species group. Surprisingly, this widespread species from southern Texas to Nicaragua has remained undescribed until now. We encountered only one specimen (Mexico, Sinaloa, Guamuchili, MPM collection) with the previous determination Gynandropus sp. UASM- 11 (det. GE Ball, 1987). It differs from similar S. balli by its somewhat smaller size (ABL 4.2 mm), the pronotum with sides rounder; elytral microsculpture mesh coarser and irregularly isodiametric. However, Danny Shpeley (personal communication, 2020) observed that numerous UASM specimens labeled “ UASM- 11 ” (also widespread in Mexico) are conspecific with “ UASM- 16 ” (= S. balli) based on his study of external structures and male genitalia. Therefore, our one example is likely not representative of UASM- 11.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFA7FF862E0017B7FE1BFAA8.taxon	description	(Fig. 19)	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFA7FF862E0017B7FE1BFAA8.taxon	description	Range. CAN: ON; USA: AL, AR, CT, DC, DE, FL, GA, IA, IL, IN, KS, KY, LA, MA, MD, ME, MI, MN, MO, MS, NC, NE, NH, NJ, NY, OH, OK, PA, RI, SC, TN, TX, VA, VT, WI, WV.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFA7FF862E0017B7FE1BFAA8.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Bousquet (2012) reported the geographic range of Selenophorus elongatus (LeConte) as AL, FL, GA. Casey (1914: 156) compared it to S. hylacis and suggested that this “ very rare ” species has a narrower body, pronotum slightly more elongate and with midline stria abbreviated to absent. In examining vast southeastern material, we were unable to find a convincing specimen that resembled S. hylacis with these subtle differences. The type specimen of S. elongatus imaged at mczbase. mcz. harvard. edu / guid / MCZ: Ent: 5883 shows no substantial external difference from the variation we observed in S. hylacis. Selenophorus elongatus is best regarded as a synonym of S. hylacis.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFA7FF862FD41253FCF8FDBD.taxon	description	Range. USA: sTX *; Mexico; Honduras *; Nicaragua *. New country record for USA.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFA7FF862FD41253FCF8FDBD.taxon	discussion	Remarks. An undescribed member of the hylacis species group from Nayarit, Mexico [12, CMNH] and Panama [1, TAMU] appears similar to S. intermedius (Fig. 20) and S. mexicanus (Fig. 21). It is distinguished from the other two species by the pronotum with disc distinctly and finely microsculptured, with sides straight before obtuse hind angles which are sparsely and finely punctulate; dorsoapical plate of median lobe truncated short, with thick lip. We assigned it the manuscript name Selenophorus “ nonintermedius ” until the Middle American fauna can be thoroughly reviewed.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFA7FF862DF01543FB62FB89.taxon	description	Range. USA: sTX *; Mexico; Guatemala; Costa Rica *; Nicaragua *. New country record for USA.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFA7FF862DE61336FCA5F984.taxon	description	Range. USA: sFL *; West Indies. New country record for USA.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFA6FF872FE21326FCCBFE53.taxon	description	Range. USA: sTX; Mexico *.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFA6FF872FE21326FCCBFE53.taxon	discussion	Remarks. The males of both S. chaparralus (Fig. 29) and the Mexican species S. tubericauda share a similar bilateral pair of carinae near the apex of ventrite 6. Superficially resembling S. chaparralus and approaching the southern limit of S. chaparralus in northeastern Mexico, S. tubericauda is distinguished primarily by its dark appendages (palps, antennae, legs), dark forebody not tinged reddish, and elytra relatively dull due to distinct microsculpture mesh. The latter feature places S. tubericauda in the concinnus group. The aedeagus in one studied male from the state of Querétaro in central Mexico is normally shaped without the abrupt bend in median lobe as seen in S. chaparralus.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFA6FF872DC1156DFC35FB0D.taxon	description	Range. USA: sFL; West Indies.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFA6FF872DC1156DFC35FB0D.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Compared to S. opalinus, the pronotum more transverse with anterior angles less projected forward; dorsoapical plate more narrowly tapered. The southern Florida records previously attributed to “ Selenophorus integer (Fabricius) ” were corrected by Shpeley et al. (2017) to be those of the widespread West Indian species S. fabricii. Selenophorus integer is restricted to the far eastern islands of the West Indies.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFA6FF872E0617B7FED7FCCF.taxon	description	(Fig. 72)	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFA6FF872E0617B7FED7FCCF.taxon	description	Range. USA: AL *, FL, MS, TX; Mexico *; Nicaragua *.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFA6FF802C1713CDFDCBFEF3.taxon	description	rounded tip moderately bent ventrad. ABL 9.0 – 10.7 mm (one outlier 8.5 mm). Range. CAN: MB, NB, ON, QC; USA: AL, AR, CT, DC, DE, FL, GA, IA, IL, IN, KS, KY, MA, MD, ME, MI, MN, MO, MS, NC, NE, NH, NJ, NY, OH, OK, PA, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, VA, VT, WI, WV; Bahamas.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFA1FF802FF31600FDAAFC19.taxon	description	(Fig. 32)	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFA1FF802FF31600FDAAFC19.taxon	description	Range. USA: sFL (Dade Co., Monroe Co.).	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFA1FF812FB514B8FB87FA2A.taxon	materials_examined	Type Material. Holotype male [deposited in TAMU] labeled: “ USA: TEXAS: Hidalgo Co. / LRGVNWR, La Coma (site 1) / 26.05302 ° N, 98.04665 ° W / X- 2 - 2008, UV light / J. King & E. Riley- 142 / re-vegetated site // TAMU – ENTO / X 0704419 ”; pinned with holotype label [red paper topmost] and genitalia in glycerin vial. Paratypes [yellow paper] as follows. Capture method is at light, mostly UV light, unless noted otherwise. USA: TEXAS: Bastrop Co.: Smithville, 6 IV 1983 (2 ♂ 1 ♀ CMNH); Bexar Co.: 9 XI 1936, “ soil peach orchard ” (1 ♂ USNM), 22 III 1937, “ under litter on soil in peach orch. ” (1 ♂ USNM); San Antonio: 5 VII 1968 (1 ♂ 1 ♀ FSCA), 18 V 1985 (1 ♀ CMNH), 25 V 1992 (1 ♀ TAMU); Leon Valley: 20 VII 1968 (1 ♂ FSCA), 14 VI 1971 (1 ♀ FSCA); Leon Springs: 16 – 17 V 2015 (3 ♀ ACMT); Blanco Co.: Cypress Mills, n. d. (1 ♂ USNM); Brazos Co.: College Station: 17 VIII 2010 (1 ♂ CMNH); 5 km SW Welborn: 19 IV 2017 (1 ♂ TAMU), 5 IV to 27 IX 2018 (7 ♀ TAMU); Brooks Co.: 10 mi N. Encino, 10 XI 2002 (1 ♂ DAHC); Brown Co.: Brownwood: 24 VI – 4 IX 2008 (1 ♂ UTA), 2 VI – 20 VII 2009 (1 ♂ UTA), 20 VII 2009 (2 ♂ UTA); Cameron Co.: S. Padre Island, 6 XII 1978, saline soil dead veg. (1 ♂ UASM); Hwy 4 – Palmetto Hill: 3 X 2008 (1 ♀ TAMU); Sabal Palm Grove: 28 IX – 29 2004 (1 ♀ PWMC), 3 – 16 IX 2008, palm forest (6 ♀ TAMU), 1 X 2008 (1 ♂ TAMU), 3 – 15 X 2008 (2 ♂ 2 ♀ TAMU), 25 IV – 29 V 2009 (2 ♂ BTRC), 29 V – 27 VI 2009 (1 ♀ BTRC), 27 VI – 25 VII 2009 (1 ♂ 1 ♀ BTRC), 29 VII – 19 IX 2009 (1 ♀ BTRC), 4 IX 2009 (1 ♀ TAMU), 19 IX – 10 X 2009 (1 ♂ 2 ♀ BTRC), 27 III – 24 IV 2010 (1 ♂ BTRC), 23 IV – 17 V 2010 (1 ♀ BTRC), 14 or 15 V – 5 VI 2010 (12 ♂ 7 ♀ BTRC, 2 ♂ PWMC), 5 VI 2010 (1 ♂ 3 ♀ TAMU), 5 VI – 16 VII 2010 (13 ♂ 22 ♀ BTRC, 1 ♂ 3 ♀ PWMC, 1 ♂ MPM, 1 ♀ WIRC), 16 VII – 7 VIII 2010 (2 ♂ 6 ♀ BTRC, 2 ♂ 1 ♀ PWMC), 9 V 2016 (1 ♀ CMNH); Brownsville: 11 III 1936, on roots in soil (2 ♀ USNM); 12 VI 1969 (1 ♀ UASM); 28 IX 2004 (2 ♀ CMNH); Laguna Atascosa NWR: 2 IV 2009, ebony grove (1 ♀ TAMU), 20 V 2009 (1 ♂ 1 ♀ TAMU), 19 IX 2009 (3 ♂ 3 ♀ TAMU), 28 III – 25 IV 2010 (1 ♀ BTRC), 25 IV – 15 V 2010 (1 ♂ PWMC); Los Indios: 1 – 9 IX 2015 (1 ♀ FSCA); Fort Bend Co.: Brazos Bend St. Pk.: 10 IV 1999 (1 ♀ TAMU), 18 VI 1999 (1 ♂ TAMU, 2 ♀ BTRC); Galveston Co.: Galveston: 26 V 2011 (1 ♀ CMNH); Guadalupe Co.: 23 IV 2015 (1 ♂ ACMT); Hardin Co.: Village Creek St. Pk.: 14 VIII 2010 (1 ♀ CMNH); Hidalgo Co.: McAllen Valley Bot. Garden, “ XI – 73 ” Malaise trap (1 ♂ FSCA); Bentsen St. Pk.: 14 X 1983 (3 ♂ 2 ♀ CMNH); LRGVNWR, La Coma: 4 IX – 19 IX, 20 IX – 3 X, 2 X, 4 – 17 X, 15 X 2008 (12 ♂ 9 ♀ TAMU); 28 II – 12 III, 26 III, 23 IV, 6 V, 12 V, 3 X, 4 – 17 X, 5 IX, 20 IX, 21 IX – 3 X, 3 X, 4 – 17 X, 18 X – 1 XI, 2 – 18 XI 2009 (12 ♂ 25 ♀ TAMU); 28 II – 15 III, 16 – 29 III, 30 – 27 IV, 26 IV, 28 IV – 15 V, 15 V, 16 V – 3 VI, 3 VI 2010 (25 ♂ 33 ♀ TAMU); Bentsen Rio Grande St. Pk.: 6 – 19 IX 2008 (4 ♀ TAMU), 20 IX – 3 X 2008 (1 ♂ TAMU), 5 IV 2009 (1 ♀ BTRC); La Joya: 28 IX 1992 (1 ♂ CMNH); LRGVNWR, McManus unit: 3 IX 2008 (4 ♂ 3 ♀ TAMU), 18 IX 2008 (1 ♂ TAMU), 19 IX – 2 X 2008 (2 ♂ TAMU), 2 X 2008 (1 ♂ 2 ♀ TAMU), 16 X 2008 (1 ♂ TAMU), Santa Ana NWR: 6 V 1967 (3 ♂ 1 ♀ USNM), 20 X 1970 (2 ♂ USNM), 20 IX 1974 (1 ♀ ACMT), 3 – 17 X 2008 (1 ♂ TAMU), 17 X 2008 (2 ♀ BTRC, 1 ♀ PWMC, 1 ♂ TAMU), 8 III – 5 IV 2009 (2 ♂ BTRC, 1 ♂ PWMC), 26 IV – 31 V 2009 (1 ♂ 2 ♀ TAMU), 31 V – 27 VI 2009 (3 ♂ 3 ♀ BTRC), 27 VI – 26 VII 2009 (1 ♂ BTRC), 30 VIII – 20 IX 2009 (5 ♂ 20 ♀ BTRC, 4 ♂ 4 ♀ CMNH, 2 ♂ 2 ♀ DAHC), 12 – 13 IX 2009 (2 ♂ 3 ♀ TAMU), 23 IV – 17 V 2010 (1 ♂ 1 ♀ BTRC, 2 ♀ PWMC), 17 V – 6 VI 2010 (1 ♂ 3 ♀ BTRC), Casa Santa Ana B & B: 21 V 2015 (1 ♀ ACMT), 18 – 19 IX 2015 (8 ♂ 9 ♀ CMNH), 1 IX 2016 (4 ♀ ACMT), 19 IX 2016 (1 ♀ ACMT); Port of Progresso: 31 VIII – 6 IX 2016 (1 ♀ FSCA); Kerr Co.: Kerrville, 16 VI 1985; Kimble Co.: Texas Tech Field Station, 12 – 13 X 2001 (1 ♀ TAMU); Kleberg Co.: Kingsville: 5 VII 1983 (2 ♂ CMNH), 28 IX 1991 (1 ♀ CMNH); La Salle Co.: Chaparral WMA, 12 IX 2003 (1 ♀ PWMC); Live Oak Co.: 13 IX 2015 (1 ♂ ACMT), 16 IX 2015 (1 ♀ ACMT), 6 IX 2016 (1 ♂ ACMT); Maverick Co.: ∼ 9 mi N Eagle Pass, 18 VIII 2016 (1 ♀ FSCA); Nueces Co.: Hazel Bazemore Pk., 29 V 1970; San Patricio Co.: Corpus Christi, 2 VI 1970 (1 ♀ TAMU); Lake Corpus Christi SP, 13 IV 1974 (1 ♀ FSCA); Welder Wildlife Refuge: 27 IX 1976 (2 ♂ CMNH), 27 IX 2004 (1 ♀ CMNH), 1 XI 2013 (1 ♂ PWMC, 1 ♂ 1 ♀ TAMU); Starr Co.: Falcon State Park, 30 IX 1976 (2 ♀ UGCA); 5 mi W Roma-Los Saenz, 18 XI 1998 (1 ♂ DAHC); Rio Grande City, 9 XI 2002 (1 ♀ DAHC); Chapeno, 6 X 2017 (3 ♂ 4 ♀ BTRC); Terrell Co.: Independence Ck., 1 VII 1959 (1 ♀ UASM); 16 mi. S. Sheffield, Blackstone Rch. 23 VI – 2 VII and 3 VII 1959 (2 ♀ UASM); Travis Co.: Austin, 2 X 1983 (1 ♂ CMNH), 9 VII – 20 VIII 2007 (2 ♀ UTA), 20 VIII – 17 IX (1 ♂ UTA), 17 IX – 05 XI 2007 (1 ♂ UTA); Austin: 2 – 3 VII 1948 (1 ♂ UASM), 4 V 2016 (1 ♀ CMNH); Uvalde Co.: Garner SP, 19 VI 1968 (1 ♂ FSCA); Val Verde Co.: “ Devil’ s Riv / V. 4.07 ” (1 ♀ USNM); Victoria Co.: Victoria: 31 V to 21 IX 2014 (4 ♂ 4 ♀ PWMC); Webb Co.: 1 mi. east Mills Benet, 5 IX 1982; Zapata Co.: Falcon St. Pk.: 15 X 1985 (10 ♀ CMNH). MEXICO: Nuevo Leon: Monterrey, 9 VII 1963 (2 ♂ CNCI); Monterrey, 7 V 1964 (2 ♀ FSCA); nr. Monterey, Mesa de Chipinique, 16 – 18 VII 1965 (3 ♂ 1 ♀ CUNY); 14.8 mi w. Linares, 18 – 20 X 1965 (1 ♂ 1 ♀ UASM); Monterrey, Siesta Motel, 27 VI 1966 (27 ♂ 61 ♀ FSCA / UASM) and 28 VI 1966 (60 ♂ 89 ♀ FSCA / UASM); Oaxaca: Oaxaca, 20 VII 1937 (1 ♂ CAS); Tamaulipas: Ciudad Mante, 5 – 8 VII 1969 (6 ♂ 30 ♀ UASM); 25 mi. e. Ciudad Mante, 18 VI 1966 (2 ♂ 1 ♀ UASM); 23.1 mi. e. Villa de Casas, 30 X 1965 (1 ♀ UASM); 20.6 mi. e. Villa de Casas, 5 VII 1966 (2 ♂ 5 ♀ UASM); 8 mi. w. El Limon 20 VII 1970 (1 ♂ TAMU); Victoria, 22 V 1952 (37 ♂ 64 ♀ AMNH); Rio Corona, 25 X 1965 (1 ♀ UASM); Rancho del Cielo, 24 – 29 VII 1971 (1 ♂ 4 ♀ UASM); 73.1 mi. n. Manuel, 3 VII 1966 (3 ♂ 2 ♀ UASM).	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFA1FF812FB514B8FB87FA2A.taxon	description	Description (Holotype). Adult male. Size: ABL 8.4 mm. Color / Luster: Dorsum shiny black, venter piceous. Mouth parts, first two antennomeres, and legs testaceous. Elytra strongly iridescent. Microsculpture: Mesh absent on dorsum at 80 × magnification. Head: HW / PW = 0.70. Pronotum: PL / PW = 0.66. Sides somewhat straightening and converging posteriorly toward obtuse hind angles. Bilateral basal impressions with punctules dense; sparse laterally on evenly convex hind angle areas. Anterior angles strongly projected forward. Elytra: Seriate setigerous punctures in striae 2, 5, and 7 small. ABS 1 well developed, longer than maximum width of interval 2. Intervals with sparse, very fine punctules. Venter: Prosternal process like that of subgenus. Ventrites with dense, very short pubescence. Ventrite 6 with 1 pair of anal setae. Legs: Male protarsi and mesotarsi typical of genus. Metatibia length like that of species group. Median lobe: Bulb narrow; dorsoapical plate abruptly narrow, markedly sinuate with tip recurved abruptly ventrad. Endophallus is without spines or welldefined macules. Variation. ABL 7.3 – 9.0 mm. Pronotum brownish in teneral specimens. Females with tarsi unmodified; with 2 pairs of anal setae.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFA1FF812FB514B8FB87FA2A.taxon	etymology	Etymology. The specific name is derived from Latin masculine adjective undatus, in reference to the wave shape of the median lobe.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFA1FF812FB514B8FB87FA2A.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Selenophorus undatus is limited to Texas and Mexico where it is distinguished from other species of Selenophorus by its shiny and iridescent black elytra, dorsal microsculpture absent, pronotum not notably cordate, elytral striae not densely punctulate, abdomen without subapical carinae in males, and body length at most 9 mm. It is most similar to S. trepidus, but that precinctive species is limited to southern Florida. Examination of the male genitalia is the most reliable way to distinguish species. Compared to the females of S. trepidus, the stylomeres in S. undatus are shorter, evenly curved with smaller radius.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFA1FF812FB514B8FB87FA2A.taxon	materials_examined	Type Habitat. The holotype was collected at the La Coma 1 tract within the La Coma unit of the Lower Rio Grande Valley National Wildlife Refuge LRGVNWR. This 12.9 - hectare site is a restored mid-valley riparian woodland habitat (King 2015) that was formerly agricultural fields and was purchased to become part of the LRGVNWR. The La Coma 1 tract was revegetated with native plant seedlings in October 1995, fourteen years before the start of the LRGV beetle biodiversity project.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFA1FF812FB514B8FB87FA2A.taxon	discussion	Remarks. This common species occurs throughout the southern two-thirds of Texas and extends southward to Oaxaca in southern Mexico. Texas examples were present in most of the institutional collections that we studied. Specimens previously labeled “ Hemisopalus sp. UASM- 5 ” are conspecific with S. undatus. Surprisingly, this species has remained undescribed until now.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFA3FF822FD517B7FC49FBA6.taxon	description	Range. USA: AZ *, sCA *, sNM *, sNV *; Mexico; Guatemala; Nicaragua *; Costa Rica *; Brazil. New country record for USA.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFA3FF822FD517B7FC49FBA6.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Bousquet (2012) reported the distribution of Selenophorus famulus Casey to be in southern Arizona, California, and Mexico. Neither Bousquet nor Casey made any references to S. aequinoctialis. The two species have not been compared in the literature. Several specimens from southwestern USA held in UAIC and UASM have been variously determined by carabid experts to be either S. famulus or S. aequinoctialis. Unpublished southwestern records for both species appear on the internet search sites www. gbif. org and www. iDigBio. org / portal. We propose that S. famulus be placed in junior synonymy with S. aequinoctialis. Our conclusion is based on comparisons of four Casey paratypes of S. famulus from Arizona (USNM) with the descriptive accounts of S. aequinoctialis by Dejean (1829: 85) and Putzeys (1878: 24), both of which clearly match the anatomic details of southwestern S. famulus described by Casey (1914: 146). Despite an abundance of prior determinations by others, the range extension of S. aequinoctialis into USA from Mexico has not been published until now. Very similar to S. palliatus, S. aequinoctialis also has elytra with foveate seriate punctures; however, the punctures tend to be smaller and fewer. In both species the metallic dorsum contrasts sharply with testaceous color along the elytral posterior border and at least the apical half of the first interval. Selenophorus aequinoctialis is distinguished from S. palliatus as follows. The body is narrower and average length is shorter (ABL 5.5 – 8.0 mm). Compared to S. palliatus in Table 2, the mean SBL for 23 males was 6.55 mm (range 6.03 – 7.40) and the mean SBL for 29 females was 7.02 mm (range 6.25 – 7.62). The pronotum has sides more convergent toward the base which lies narrower against the elytra; the basal angles are distinctly obtuse and less rounded. The head is proportionately wider against the straighter anterior border of the pronotum; the anterior angles are less projected forward. Viewed from behind, the humerus is less prominent with tooth absent or obsolete compared to the suggested angulation with minute sharp tooth frequently seen in S. palliatus. The male ventrite 6 exhibits mostly one pair of long anal setae (as in S. palliatus) or two such pairs in some specimens. This duality in the number of male anal setae was routinely observed in S. sinuaticollis of the same species group. The structure of the median lobe is only subtly different from that of S. palliatus. Viewed dorsally, it tends to be narrower with sides converging from middle of the shaft gradually, more evenly, toward acute dorsoapical plate. In S. palliatus, this convergence is more rapid, beginning well distal to middle of the shaft, and the apex is blunter. The endophallus is unarmed in both species. Compared to specimens in the Nearctic, S. aequinoctialis in Neotropical regions have pronota with sides somewhat more rounded, less convergent, with obtuse basal angles less prominent. No convincing examples of S. aequinoctialis from Texas were encountered in our extensive survey. We concluded that S. palliatus and S. aequinoctialis in the United States have allopatric distributions. The former occurs eastward from the regional span Texas-Oklahoma-southern Illinois; the latter occurs west of Texas. Previous reports of S. palliatus in Arizona, California, and New Mexico are likely misidentifications.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFA3FF832DF11340FEF3FC17.taxon	description	Range. USA: AL, AR, FL, GA, sIL, LA, MS, NC, OK *, SC, TX, VA *; Mexico; West Indies.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFA3FF832DF11340FEF3FC17.taxon	discussion	Remarks. The male holotype of Harpalus laesus LeConte is associated with label “ H. (S.) laesus Lec. Hald. palliatus 6 ”. Its image at mczbase. mcz. harvard. edu / guid / MCZ: Ent: 5914 yields ABL approximately 8.3 mm. Horn (1880: 180) regarded S. palliatus with slightly larger punctures as a synonym of S. laesus. Casey (1914: 146) reported the main distinction of S. laesus from S. palliatus is that the seriate punctures are much smaller, not conspicuously foveate as in palliatus. Bousquet (2012: 1143) listed S. laesus as a valid species with the geographic range of central TX,? AZ, and Mexico. The image of the type specimen (MCZ), and additional high-resolution images of a specimen (USNM) identified as S. laesus by Casey, do not show significant puncture size differences from S. palliatus in our opinion. Based on a study of extensive Texas material, we concluded that S. palliatus is an anatomically variable species (even among individuals in same series) with regard to body size, pronotal shape, and the size of seriate punctures. Selenophorus laesus represents one expression in a morphological continuum of S. palliatus. Little or no differences were noted in the male genitalia.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFA2FFBC2FC0149FFDECFC0C.taxon	materials_examined	Type Material. Holotype male [deposited in TAMU] labeled: “ USA: TX: Cameron Co., Sabal Palm Grove, V- 29 / VI- 27 - 2009, B. Raber & D. Heffern // 25.849 ° N 97.417 ° W, UV light trap, palm forest core ”; pinned with holotype label [red paper topmost] and genitalia in glycerin vial. Paratypes [yellow paper] as follows. Capture method is at light, mostly UV light, unless noted otherwise. USA: TEXAS: Cameron Co.: Laguna Atascosa NWR, 25 IV – 15 V 2010 (1 ♂ BTRC); Hidalgo Co.: Santa Ana NWR, 31 V – 27 VI 2009 (1 ♂ BTRC); Starr Co.: Chapeno 6 X 2017 (1 ♂ 1 ♀ BTRC), 1 X 2020 (1 ♀ DAHC). MEXICO: Jalisco: Chamela Biol. Sta., 95 m, 19 29.9 N 105 02.7 W, 22 – 23 VI 2013 (2 ♀ CMNH); Sonora: 7.2 mi E Alamos, 24 VIII 1964 (2 ♀ MPM); 2 mi. W Mocuzari, 3 IX 1964 (1 ♀ MPM); 1.5 mi. N Navojoa, 25 VIII 1964 (1 ♀ MPM); [following reposited at UASM as species UASM- 17 by George E. Ball] Sinaloa: Mazatlan, 15 – 20 VIII 1962, at light (5 ♂ 12 ♀ UASM, 2 ♂ 2 ♀ PWMC, 1 ♂ DAHC, 1 ♀ TAMU, 1 ♀ BTRC); El Cameron, 16 VIII 1962, “ near beach ” (1 ♀ UASM, 1 ♀ PWMC); 18 VIII 1962, “ mango grove ” (2 ♀ UASM). Tabasco: 22 V 1972, “ UV light ” (1 ♂ 1 ♀ UASM); Veracruz: 26 – 30 VI 1963 (1 ♀ UASM); 4 VII 1963 (1 ♂ UASM); [following reposited at USNM] Michoacán: Arteaga, 10 IX 2004 (1 ♀); La Huacana, 9 IX 2004 (1 ♀); Puebla: Tehuitzingo, 1 – 2 IX 2004 (1 ♂ 3 ♀).	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFA2FFBC2FC0149FFDECFC0C.taxon	description	Description (Holotype). Adult male. Size: ABL 6.0 mm. Color / Luster: Dorsum uniformly piceous, shiny metallic luster. Antennomere 1 rufous, distally piceous. Femora rufous, tibiae distally and tarsi darker. Venter uniformly piceous to black, contrasting with rufous epipleura of pronotum and elytra. Microsculpture: Entire dorsum with mesh distinctly impressed, regular to irregular isodiametric. Venter with mesh irregularly isodiametric to moderately stretched. Head: HW / PW = 0.75. Eyes moderate in size and convexity. Labrum proportionately long and narrow relative to clypeus. Pronotum: PL / PW = 0.68. Widest well before middle. Base distinctly narrower than base of elytra. Lateral sides quite rounded anteriorly, becoming straight and subparallel toward subrectangulate hind angles. Base and front of pronotum with coarse setigerous punctures. Anterior border straight, anterior angles only slightly projected. Elytra: Striae moderately impressed, seriate punctures moderately large, subfoveate. ABS 1 long, intersecting elytral stria 1. Intervals slightly convex without distinct punctules. Intervals 8 and 9, as well as inner intervals at apex, punctulate and pubescent. Venter: Prosternum entirely pubescent; much of venter covered with conspicuous setae. Prosternal process like that of subgenus. Ventrite 6 with 1 pair of anal setae. Legs: Metatarsi length and features of tarsi are those of the species group. Male protarsi and mesotarsi typical of genus. Median lobe: Evenly curved in lateral view; without evident narrowing behind bulb in dorsal view. Dorsoapical plate short, tapered abruptly and subacutely to rounded tip, not bent, without lip. Endophallus without spines. Variation. ABL 6.0 – 7.0 mm. Some specimens from Texas and most from Mexico with slight lightening of the elytral apex and distal 1 / 3 of the first interval. Females with tarsi unmodified; with 2 pairs of anal setae.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFA2FFBC2FC0149FFDECFC0C.taxon	etymology	Etymology. The specific name honors Edward G. Riley, Assistant Curator, Texas A & M University (retired), for his patient mentorship of the second author and his leadership during the LRGV Beetle Survey project by which many of the beetles in this study were acquired, including the Texas specimens of this species.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFA2FFBC2FC0149FFDECFC0C.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Selenophorus rileyi is distinguished from other Nearctic Selenophorus species by the dark elytra with strong metallic luster; pronotum with base and front coarsely punctate, hind angles sharply subrectangular; elytra with subfoveate seriate punctures and dense pubescence of intervals 8 and 9. Specimens in various collections labeled “ Selenophorus sp. UASM- 17 ” are conspecific with S. rileyi.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFFA2FFBC2FC0149FFDECFC0C.taxon	materials_examined	Type Habitat. Holotype was collected at the Sabal Palm Sanctuary (Fig. 75) utilizing ultraviolet light traps placed in the old growth “ core ” palm jungle. The sanctuary is in a bend of the Rio Grande River south of Brownsville, TX. The 527 - acre preserve comprises the largest tract of Sabal mexicana Mart. (Arecaceae) jungle left in the USA and includes about 32 acres of old growth jungle. Specimens were collected in ultraviolet light traps placed in the “ core ” over a two-year period. Additional associated Selenophorus species collected there were S. balli, S. elytrostictus, S. fatuus, S. intermedius, S. mexicanus, S. palliatus, S. striatopunctatus, and S. undatus. Texas collection sites also include Laguna Atascosa NWR, Santa Ana NWR and Chapeno in Starr County. Range. Selenophorus rileyi was found widely in Mexico from Mazatlan on the Pacific coast to Veracruz on the Bay of Campeche, then extending 550 miles northward to the LRGV in Texas. Most records are near coastal areas, but a few records extend to the foothills of the Cordillera Volcánica in Mexico reaching elevations of 1,035 m.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFF9DFFBC2FEF1289FBDDFE03.taxon	description	(Fig. 49)	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFF9DFFBC2FEF1289FBDDFE03.taxon	description	hind angles obtusely rounded. Metatarsi dorsally with conspicuous, long setae. Median lobe with dorsoapical plate narrow, apex swollen with small hook dorsad. Endophallus with spines variable in number (4 – 8), in size (small to large), and in position; typically, with at least 2 spines in middle endophallus and a pair in ostium. ABL 4.5 – 5.8 mm. Range. USA: AZ *, AL, FL, GA, KY *, LA, MS, NC, SC, TN, TX; Mexico;? Nicaragua.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFF9DFFBC2DE316B5FC04FB45.taxon	description	Range. USA: FL; West Indies.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFF9DFFBC2FD814C8FE09FAF2.taxon	description	Range. USA: sAZ, sNM; Mexico.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFF9DFFBD2DF812DCFED4FDCD.taxon	description	narrower than elytra. Hind femur posteriorly with fewer than 5 long setae. Metatarsi dorsally with conspicuous, long setae. Males with 2 pairs of anal setae: + ♂ 2. Median lobe with dorsoapical plate long, narrowly tapering to apex with indistinct lip. Endophallus midsection with 6 medium spines clustered and several individual tiny spicules scattered. ABL 5.5 – 7.2 mm. Range. USA: AZ, CO, NM, TX, UT; Mexico.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFF9DFFBD2DF812DCFED4FDCD.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Selenophorus scolopaceus is known only by the type series from “ Colorado ”. Selenophorus scolopaceus is treated as a synonym based on our study of type specimen photographs and its close proximity to S. aeneopiceus in the key by Casey (1914). Genitalia were not available for comparison.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFF9CFFBD2FFE1509FDE3FBC3.taxon	description	Range. USA: nFL *, GA, NC, SC.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFF9CFFBD2FF613F0FB84FC31.taxon	description	Range. CAN: ON; USA: AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, FL, GA, IA, IL, IN, KS, KY *, LA, MD, MO, MS, MT, NC, NJ, NM, NY, OH, OK, PA, SC, SD, TN, TX, VA, WI, WV, WY; Mexico.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFF9CFFBD2FF613F0FB84FC31.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Casey’ s descriptions of the four species here proposed for synonymy are subtle and difficult to interpret. We found no convincing differences from S. pedicularius among vast studied material from the southern states. Photographs of the four type specimens supported our conclusion. Genitalia were not available for comparison.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFF9CFFBD2C0714C0FB84F904.taxon	description	Range. CAN: AB, BC, MB, ON, SK; USA: AZ, CO, IA, IL, KS, MI, MN, MS, MT, ND, NE, NM, OH, OK, OR, SD, TX, UT, WI, WY; Mexico.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFF9CFFBD2C0714C0FB84F904.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Selenophorus otiosus is treated as a synonym based on its description and placement in the key by Casey (1914). Additional support was provided by photos taken of the type dorsal habitus. Genitalia were not available for comparison.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFF9FFFBE2FCC17B7FC4AFE8E.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Ball and Maddison (1987: 252) transferred S. ruficollis from the genus Amblygnathus Dejean on the basis of its clypeus with anterior margin only weakly emarginate (underlying labral membrane not exposed), the head not sufficiently enlarged, and the endophallus with abundant spines. The authors treated Amblygnathus nigripennis Bates as a junior synonym of S. ruficollis. They recognized that both Amblygnathus and the ruficollis group (monobasic at that time) belong to the “ laminate ” complex of the selenophorines. The complex was characterized by the presence in the median lobe ostium of an elongated lamina that is typically right-hooked at its apical end. The authors therefore postulated that S. ruficollis is the sister species of genus Amblygnathus. Selenophorus ruficollis (Putzeys)	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFF9FFFBE2FCC17B7FC4AFE8E.taxon	description	Selenophorus ruficollis is a widespread Neotropical species. Based on our study of five Brazilian specimens [CMNH] previously determined by G. E. Ball, this species differs from S. neoruficollis by the elytra entirely devoid of microsculpture; abdomen much darker (black); pronotum finely rugose basomedially; metatarsi with only sparse, short pubescence; different sexual dimorphism + ♂ 1 — ♀ 2. Endophallus with short slender lamina in the ostium in front of which are 2 short parallel rows of dense spines; more proximally 2 longer rows of sparse noncontiguous spines; in some specimens all the spines widely spaced in 2 long rows. ABL 4.0 – 5.0 mm. Range: Central America (Panama), South America (eastern Colombia, Upper Amazon, Brazil *, Bolivia *).	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFF9FFFB82DB4163FFE2CFAF6.taxon	materials_examined	Type Material. Holotype male [deposited in TAMU] labeled “ USA: TX: Brazos Co. / 5 km SW Wellborn / 30.5022 N 96.3360 W / 1 - 7. vi. 2018 / @ lights V. Belov ”; pinned with holotype label [red paper topmost] and genitalia in glycerin vial. Paratypes [yellow paper] as follows. Capture method is at light, mostly UV light, unless noted otherwise. USA: LOUISIANA: Natchitoches Par.: Kisatchie N. F., 9 IX 2010 (1 ♀ CMNH). TEXAS: Bastrop Co.: 23 VII 1988 (1 ♀ TAMU); Brazos Co.: 28 X 1996 (1 ♀ TAMU); Riley Estate, 4 X 2002 (2 ♂ TAMU); 18 IX 2005 (1 ♂ TAMU); 9 – 15 IX 2010 (1 ♀ CMNH); 5 km SW Wellborn, 20 – 31 VII 2016 (1 ♂ 2 ♀ PWMC); 4 – 18 VIII 2016 (1 ♂ 1 ♀ PWMC); 10 – 16 IX 2016 (1 ♀ PWMC, 1 ♂ 2 ♀ TAMU); 4 – 29 X 2016 (2 ♂ 1 ♀ PWMC, 3 ♂ 6 ♀ TAMU, 1 ♂ 1 ♀ BTRC, 1 ♀ MPM); 2 – 4 XI 2016 (1 ♂ PWMC, 1 ♂ BTRC); XI – XII 2016 (1 ♀ BTRC, 1 ♀ TAMU); 27 III 2017 (1 ♀ BTRC); 20 IV 2017 (1 ♂ TAMU); 14 – 26 V 2017 (2 ♀ TAMU); 1 – 26 VI 2017 (1 ♂ 3 ♀ TAMU, 2 ♂ 2 ♀ CNCI, 1 ♀ BTRC, 2 ♂ 2 ♀ DAHC); 2 – 20 VII 2017 (1 ♂ 2 ♀ TAMU, 1 ♀ BTRC); 25 – 30 IX 2017 (3 ♀ TAMU, 1 ♂ USNM); 2 – 23 X 2017 (2 ♂ 7 ♀ TAMU, 3 ♂ BTRC); 1 – 15 XI 2017 (1 ♀ TAMU, 3 ♀ BTRC); 8 – 31 V 2018 (1 ♂ 3 ♀ TAMU, 2 ♂ 2 ♀ USNM, 1 ♂ 2 ♀ UASM, 1 ♂ 2 ♀ UTA); 1 – 30 VI 2018 (1 ♀ TAMU, 2 ♂ 2 ♀ FSCA, 1 ♂ UASM, 1 ♂ UTA), 1 – 31 VII 2018 (4 ♀ TAMU, 1 ♂ 2 ♀ USNM); 4 – 20 IX 2018 (2 ♂ 2 ♀ AMNH, 1 ♂ 4 ♀ TAMU); 5 km SW Wellborn: same data as holotype except various dates 25 III – 27 XI 2018 (8 ♂ 3 ♀ TAMU); TAMU Campus, 15 III 2016 (1 ♀ TAMU); 15 – 16 X 2016 (2 ♀ TAMU).	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFF9FFFB82DB4163FFE2CFAF6.taxon	description	Description (Holotype). Adult male. Size: ABL 5.2 mm. Color / Luster: Dorsal color as for that of species group. Antennomeres 1 — 3, mouthparts, legs, and much of venter testaceous; abdomen darker. Elytra strongly iridescent. Microsculpture: Pronotum with mesh obsolete. Elytra with striate microsculpture weakly impressed, more distinct laterally. Head: HW / PW = 0.76. Eyes moderately large. Pronotum: PL / PW = 0.67. Sides convergent nearly straight toward distinct obtuse hind angles. Base smooth, impunctate. Elytra: Common structural features of the species group. Venter: Prosternal process like that of subgenus. Ventrites with sparse, inconspicuous pubescence. Ventrite 6 with 2 pairs of anal setae. Legs: Male protarsi and mesotarsi typical of genus. Metatarsi dorsally with conspicuous setae. Median lobe: Dorsoapical plate moderately long, with prominent but short, curved dorsal hook. Endophallus with massive lamina filling large ostium; proximally with 2 dark parallel fields of long microtrichia or slender spines. Variation. ABL 4.5 – 5.2 mm. Females with microsculpture distinctly striate on elytra, weakly striate on pronotum; tarsi unmodified; 2 pairs of anal setae as in males.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFF9FFFB82DB4163FFE2CFAF6.taxon	etymology	Etymology. The specific name is derived from Greek neo (new) prefixed to ruficollis, in reference to the close resemblance to S. ruficollis.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFF9FFFB82DB4163FFE2CFAF6.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Selenophorus neoruficollis is distinguished from the other two species in the S. ruficollis species group by its limited northern range in southcentral USA and the presence of dorsal microsculpture that is not well impressed. In addition, males have a massive lamina in the ostium.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFF9FFFB82DB4163FFE2CFAF6.taxon	materials_examined	Type Habitat. The holotype was collected approximately 5 km SW of the city of College Station, Texas, within half a mile of the Brazos River. This area is located within the Post Oak Savannah Ecoregion of central Texas and is characterized by rolling hills with sandy soils and scattered clumps of trees, primarily post oaks. Forested bottom lands along creeks and rivers typically have clay-loam or clay soils.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFF9FFFB82DB4163FFE2CFAF6.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Compared to S. neoruficollis, S. pararuficollis of South America is slightly larger; dorsal microsculpture strongly impressed; elytra only faintly iridescent; pronotum with hind angles clearly subdentate, sides more evenly curved, finely rugose basomedially; antennomeres slightly longer; venter with dense, conspicuous pubescence; same sexual dimorphism + ♂ 2 — ♀ 2. See the holotype account for S. pararuficollis below.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFF99FFB92F9E12FEFDD0FBF6.taxon	materials_examined	Type Material. Holotype male [deposited in CMNH] labeled “ Paraguay: / Dept. Central, San / Lorenzo, 18 - 19 Nov / 1986 J. A. Kochalka / uv light trap ”; pinned with holotype label [red paper topmost] and genitalia in glycerin vial. Paratypes [yellow paper] as follows. Capture method is UV light trap. PARAGUAY: Same collection event as holotype, held in CMNH unless stated otherwise: (30 ♂ 48 ♀ CMNH, 2 ♂ PWMC, 2 ♂ 2 ♀ BTRC, 1 ♂ 1 ♀ DAHC, 1 ♂ 1 ♀ USNM); same as previous except dates 7 XI 1986 (1 ♂ 1 ♀), 23 – 24 XI 1986 (6 ♂ 14 ♀ CMNH, 1 ♂ BTRC), 30 XII 1987 (21 ♂ 33 ♀ CMNH, 1 ♀ PWMC, 1 ♂ 1 ♀ TAMU), 20 – 24 VIII 1989 (1 ♂ 1 ♀), 11 IX 1989 (1 ♂ 3 ♀ CMNH, 1 ♀ PWMC). BOLIVIA: 19 mi NW Villa Tunari, 1 IV 1978 (1 ♀ MPM).	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFF99FFB92F9E12FEFDD0FBF6.taxon	description	Description (Holotype). Adult male. Size: ABL 5.4 mm. Color / Luster: Dorsal color like that of species group. Antennomeres 1 – 2, mouthparts, legs, and much of venter testaceous. Elytra faintly iridescent. Microsculpture: Pronotum and elytra with stretched mesh strongly impressed. Head: HW / PW = 0.68. Eyes large. Pronotum: PL / PW = 0.65. Sides narrowly rounded, convergent toward hind angles, subdentate. Base smooth, impunctate. Elytra: Common structural features of the species group. Venter: Prosternal process like that of subgenus. Ventrites with dense, conspicuous pubescence. Ventrite 6 with 2 pairs of long anal setae. Legs: Male protarsi and mesotarsi typical of genus. Metatarsi dorsally with conspicuous setae. Median lobe: Dorsoapical plate short, narrow with ventral hook at tip and a small sharp hook directed into ostium. Endophallus with 2 long rows of densely packed spines that span most of the median lobe, positioned dorsolaterally right and ventrolaterally left. Penile ostium relatively small; spanned in middle by a protruded wedge-shaped lamina pointed proximad, widened apicad, abruptly truncated in dorsal view. Variation. ABL 4.9 – 5.5 mm. Females with tarsi unmodified; with 2 pairs of anal setae as in males.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFF99FFB92F9E12FEFDD0FBF6.taxon	etymology	Etymology. The specific name is derived from Greek para (beside) prefixed to ruficollis, in reference to the close resemblance to S. ruficollis.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFF99FFB92F9E12FEFDD0FBF6.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Selenophorus pararuficollis is distinguished from the other members of the ruficollis species group in the remarks for S. neoruficollis.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFF99FFB92F9E12FEFDD0FBF6.taxon	materials_examined	Type Habitat. The holotype was collected in the Central District, which is the smallest and most densely populated of the 17 districts in Paraguay. This area ranges in elevation from 200 – 500 feet and is within the “ Humid Chaco ” ecological region characterized by extensive savannahs of palms with wetlands, estuaries, and gallery forests dominated by Lake Ypacarai and several rivers and river tributaries of Rio Paraguay.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFF99FFB92F9E12FEFDD0FBF6.taxon	discussion	Remarks. The single paratype specimen from Bolivia shares the same collection event as that of three typical specimens of S. ruficollis.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFF98FFBA2FBB1234FCC8FB81.taxon	materials_examined	Type Material. Holotype male [deposited in TAMU] labeled “ USA: TX: Cameron Co., Laguna Atascosa NWR, IV- 25 / V- 15 - 2010, B. Raber & D. Heffern // 26.218 ° N, 97.355 ° W, UV light trap, edge of marsh ”; pinned with holotype label [red paper topmost] and genitalia in glycerin vial. Paratypes [yellow paper] as follows. Capture method is at light, mostly UV light, unless noted otherwise. USA: TEXAS: Brooks Co: Falfurrias, 10 XI 2002, “ uv light trap marshy pond ” (2 ♀ DAHC); Cameron Co., Sabal Palm Grove: 20 IX – 19 X 2008 (1 ♀ PWMC, 2 ♀ BTRC); 6 II – 7 III 2009 (1 ♂ TAMU); 7 III – 4 IV 2009 (1 ♂ PWMC, 1 ♀ MPM); 27 VI – 25 VII 2009 (1 ♀ BTRC); 25 VII – 29 VIII 2009 (1 ♀ PWMC); 10 X – 6 XI 2009 (1 ♂ PWMC); 27 III – 24 IV 2010 (1 ♂ 1 ♀ PWMC, 2 ♂ BTRC, 1 ♀ UTA); 24 or 25 IV – 15 V 2010 (1 ♀ PWMC); 14 or 15 V – 5 VI 2010 (2 ♀ PWMC, 1 ♂ 1 ♀ BTRC, 1 ♂ UTA); 5 VI – 16 VII 2010 (1 ♂ PWMC); Cameron Co., Laguna Atascosa NWR: 28 III – 25 IV 2010 (4 ♂ PWMC, 2 ♂ 2 ♀ BTRC); 24 or 25 IV – 15 V 2010 (4 ♂ 4 ♀ PWMC, 4 ♂ 2 ♀ BTRC, 1 ♂ 1 ♀ USNM, 1 ♂ 1 ♀ UASM); Hidalgo Co.: Mercedes, 22 – 23 I 1974, “ leaf litter under Hackberry trees ” (1 ♂ TAMU); Bentsen State Park, 14 X 1985 (1 ♂ CMNH); Santa Ana NWR, 31 V – 27 VI 2009 (1 ♀ BTRC); 26 IV – 31 V 2009 (1 ♂ 1 ♀ TAMU); La Coma tract, 15 V 2010 (1 ♂ 1 ♀ TAMU); Kleberg Co.: Kingsville, 20 X 1992 (1 ♀ CMNH); LaSalle Co.: Fowlerton, 11 X 2003 (1 ♀ TAMU); San Patricio Co.: Welder Wildlife Refuge, 1 XI 2013 (1 ♂ PWMC); Victoria Co.: Victoria, 21 IX 2014, “ attracted to light ” (1 ♂ PWMC); Zapata Co.: Falcon State Park, 15 X 1985 (1 ♂ CMNH).	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFF98FFBA2FBB1234FCC8FB81.taxon	description	Description (Holotype). Adult male. Size: ABL 5.5 mm. Color: Dorsum piceous to black; distal portion of elytral interval 1 testaceous; lateral margins of pronotum and elytra narrowly testaceous. Labrum orange, also mandibles but their apices piceous. Antennomeres 1 – 2 testaceous, remainder of antenna piceous. Legs and trochanters testaceous. Venter dark reddish-brown, contrasting with testaceous epipleura of pronotum and elytra. Luster: Dorsum and venter very shiny. Elytra distinctly iridescent, venter less so. Microsculpture: Head with uniformly distinct isodiametric mesh. Pronotum with mesh distinct, moderately transverse. Elytra with microsculpture distinct, striate. Venter with mesh irregularly transverse. Head: HW / PW = 0.74. Eyes large, markedly convex. Pronotum: PL / PW = 0.67. Widest before middle. Sides narrowly rounded posteriorly to obtusely angulate hind angles. Anterior angles weakly produced. Base narrower than base of elytra; margin straight, not bisinuate. Bilateral basal impressions deep, delimited laterally by moderate convexity, with fine rugose punctation which extends to entire base. Elytra: Striae densely punctulate, with striae 2, 5, 7 also bearing seriate setigerous punctures much larger but not foveate. ABS 1 short. Intervals flat to slightly convex; with densely, irregularly distributed punctules, deep and rather coarse, some nearly size of strial punctules. Venter: Prosternal process like that of subgenus. Ventrites with moderately dense pubescence. Ventrite 6 with 1 pair of anal setae. Legs: Protarsi and mesotarsi typical of males in genus. Median lobe: Dorsoapical plate moderately long with subparallel sides extended to rounded tip, deflected slightly to right. In lateral view, apical plate at extreme tip slightly bent ventrad. Endophallus with dark reticulated field occupying much of proximal half, with 2 adjacent spines in ostium distally, each the length of the apical plate. Variation. ABL 5.0 – 6.0 mm. Most males with 2 endophallic spines; less commonly with 1 or 3 spines. Females with tarsi unmodified; with 2 pairs of anal setae.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFF98FFBA2FBB1234FCC8FB81.taxon	etymology	Etymology. The specific name is derived from Greek elytron (sheath) and stiktos (punctured), in reference to the elytra densely punctate.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFF98FFBA2FBB1234FCC8FB81.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Selenophorus elytrostictus is distinguished externally from other North American Selenophorus species by their elytra strongly iridescent, striae densely punctulate, pronotum with hind angles obtuse and microsculpture undiminished atop the disc. The last two characters distinguish it from the similar species S. striatopunctatus (Figs. 59 – 63), which has hind angles more rounded and discal microsculpture diminished medially.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFF98FFBA2FBB1234FCC8FB81.taxon	materials_examined	Type Habitat. The holotype was collected at Laguna Atascosa National Wildlife Refuge (Fig. 69) in the Lower Rio Grande Valley (LRGV) region of south Texas. We also collected this species at Sabal Palm Sanctuary and Santa Ana NWR, a 2,088 - acre remnant subtropical forest bordering the Rio Grande River containing wetlands, riparian forests, and upland Tamaulipan thorn scrub. Ten Selenophorus species were collected at Santa Ana NWR including S. balli, S. elytrostictus, S. fatuus, S. intermedius, S. palliatus, S. pedicularius, S. rileyi, S. seriatoporus, S. striatopunctatus, and S. undatus.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFF98FFBA2FBB1234FCC8FB81.taxon	discussion	Remarks on Similar Selenophorus striatopunctatus. The SEM image for S. elytrostictus (Fig. 66) shows the pronotum with straight sides converging to distinct obtuse hind angles and with a relatively straight posterior margin. Those features contrast with S. striatopunctatus (Fig. 61) which exhibits a pronotum with evenly curved sides, hind angles obtusely rounded, and bisinuate basal margin. Elytral intervals in S. elytrostictus appear more deeply punctate (Fig. 67) and the striae appear more deeply grooved (Fig. 68) than in S. striatopunctatus (Figs. 62 and 63, respectively). The habitus and male genitalia of S. striatopunctatus were figured in Shpeley et al. (2017). Its median lobe has a short dorsoapical plate and a row of several large spines in the endophallic middle section. The median lobe of S. elytrostictus has a much longer dorsoapical plate with subparallel sides and its endophallus has only one to three small spines distally in the ostium. Remarks on Similar Selenophorus genuinus. The male holotype of Selenophorus genuinus Putzeys (1878 a: 34), from Cayenne-French Guiana in northern South America is externally like S. elytrostictus in all respects (ABL 6 mm) except for coloration toward rufo-brunneous with apex of elytra and the apical portion of interval 1 paler. The shapes of the median lobe dorsoapical plates are similar. Selenophorus genuinus is distinguished by the absence of spines associated with the endophallus. Another examined specimen from Surinam (Paramaribo) is colored shiny black like S. elytrostictus, but since it does not exhibit endophallic spines, it is likely S. genuinus. The preceding observations were made by D. Shpeley (personal communication, 2015). Upon further studying a high-resolution image of the holotype and examining females of likely S. genuinus held at USNM (British Guiana: Georgetown; Venezuela: Guárico), we believe that this species can be externally distinguished from S. elytrostictus by the presence of coarser and denser punctures that extend across the entire pronotum base, notably inside the basal impressions. The hind angles are distinctly obtuse with apices slightly sharper. Remarks on Range. The southern geographic limit of S. elytrostictus is uncertain. Because we found it in a few separate localities of extreme southern Texas, the species almost certainly extends into Mexico. The published range for similar S. striatopunctatus is quite extensive, from southern United States to northern South America. It is possible that some Neotropical records of S. striatopunctatus were based on S. elytrostictus and / or S. genuinus.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFF9BFFBA2DDD1326FBC6F969.taxon	description	Range. USA: FL,? GA, LA, TX; Mexico; Honduras *; Nicaragua *; Panama *; Colombia; West Indies.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
03ACA32BFF9BFFBA2DDD1326FBC6F969.taxon	discussion	Remarks. In comparing material to S. elytrostictus, we confirmed that the Casey types for Hemisopalus vigilans and Hemisopalus depressulus are conspecific with S. striatopunctatus.	en	Rajab, Abubakarsidiq Makame (2021): Indoor Radio Map localization WiFi fingerprint datasets. The Coleopterists Bulletin 75 (1): 9-55, DOI: 10.21227/ybfj-me86, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ybfj-me86
