taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
03AABA6D1809AA6CFF5BFC14FE966746.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/262144/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.262144	FIGURE 4. Photographs of Crenadactylus ocellatus species-group members in life (left to right, top to bottom): A) C. ocellatus, Koolyanobbing, WA (photo—R. J. Ellis), B) C. horni, Trephina Gorge, NT (photo—G. M. Shea), C) occidentalis sp. nov., 70 km S Exmouth, WA (photo—G. Gaikhorst), D) C. tuberculatus sp. nov., Cape Range National Park, WA (photo—R. J. Ellis), E) C. pilbarensis sp. nov., Burrup Peninsula, WA (photo—B. Maryan), F) C. rostralis, Geikie Gorge National Park, WA (photo—P. M. Oliver), G) C. naso, Koolan Island, WA (photo—G. Gaikhorst), H) C. naso, Mitchell Plateau, WA (Photo— G. M. Shea).	FIGURE 4. Photographs of Crenadactylus ocellatus species-group members in life (left to right, top to bottom): A) C. ocellatus, Koolyanobbing, WA (photo—R. J. Ellis), B) C. horni, Trephina Gorge, NT (photo—G. M. Shea), C) occidentalis sp. nov., 70 km S Exmouth, WA (photo—G. Gaikhorst), D) C. tuberculatus sp. nov., Cape Range National Park, WA (photo—R. J. Ellis), E) C. pilbarensis sp. nov., Burrup Peninsula, WA (photo—B. Maryan), F) C. rostralis, Geikie Gorge National Park, WA (photo—P. M. Oliver), G) C. naso, Koolan Island, WA (photo—G. Gaikhorst), H) C. naso, Mitchell Plateau, WA (Photo— G. M. Shea).	2016-12-31	Doughty, Paul;Ellis, Ryan J.;Oliver, Paul M.		Zenodo	biologists	Doughty, Paul;Ellis, Ryan J.;Oliver, Paul M.			
03AABA6D1809AA6CFF5BFC14FE966746.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/262142/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.262142	FIGURE 2. Distribution of the Crenadactylus ocellatus species-group including new species described in this paper. Darker shades denote areas of high topographic complexity, lighter shades lower complexity. Colours for taxa match those in Fig. 1. Questionable type location of Ebenavia horni holotype indicated by ‘? ’.	FIGURE 2. Distribution of the Crenadactylus ocellatus species-group including new species described in this paper. Darker shades denote areas of high topographic complexity, lighter shades lower complexity. Colours for taxa match those in Fig. 1. Questionable type location of Ebenavia horni holotype indicated by ‘? ’.	2016-12-31	Doughty, Paul;Ellis, Ryan J.;Oliver, Paul M.		Zenodo	biologists	Doughty, Paul;Ellis, Ryan J.;Oliver, Paul M.			
03AABA6D1809AA6CFF5BFC14FE966746.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/262143/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.262143	FIGURE 3. Morphological variation within the Crenadactylus ocellatus species group (left to right, top to bottom): A) typical homogeneous dorsal scalation of Crenadactylus species (except C. tuberculatus), B) heterogeneous dorsal scalation of C. tuberculatus sp. nov. with enlarged tubercles, C) typical internasal configuration of Crenadactylus species (except C. horni) showing small internasal when present (upper left) or supranasals in contact (lower right), D) internasal configuration of C. horni showing enlarged internasal extending beyond posterior edge of supranasals, E) typical postmental configuration of Crenadactylus species (except C. pilbarensis) showing granular gular scales, F) postmental configuration of C. pilbarensis sp. nov. showing enlarged postmental, G) typical snout scalation in lateral view (exception C. rostralis, C. naso [part]) showing rostral-nostril contact, H) snout scalation in lateral view of C. rostralis (and C. naso [part]) showing excluded rostral contact with nostril. (Drawings: A, B – K. Aplin; C – F, R. J. Ellis; G, H – R. E. Johnstone.)	FIGURE 3. Morphological variation within the Crenadactylus ocellatus species group (left to right, top to bottom): A) typical homogeneous dorsal scalation of Crenadactylus species (except C. tuberculatus), B) heterogeneous dorsal scalation of C. tuberculatus sp. nov. with enlarged tubercles, C) typical internasal configuration of Crenadactylus species (except C. horni) showing small internasal when present (upper left) or supranasals in contact (lower right), D) internasal configuration of C. horni showing enlarged internasal extending beyond posterior edge of supranasals, E) typical postmental configuration of Crenadactylus species (except C. pilbarensis) showing granular gular scales, F) postmental configuration of C. pilbarensis sp. nov. showing enlarged postmental, G) typical snout scalation in lateral view (exception C. rostralis, C. naso [part]) showing rostral-nostril contact, H) snout scalation in lateral view of C. rostralis (and C. naso [part]) showing excluded rostral contact with nostril. (Drawings: A, B – K. Aplin; C – F, R. J. Ellis; G, H – R. E. Johnstone.)	2016-12-31	Doughty, Paul;Ellis, Ryan J.;Oliver, Paul M.		Zenodo	biologists	Doughty, Paul;Ellis, Ryan J.;Oliver, Paul M.			
03AABA6D1809AA6CFF5BFC14FE966746.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/262147/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.262147	FIGURE 7. Variation in Crenadactylus ocellatus (scale bar = 10 mm). From left to right: WAM R 132810, WAM R 152975, WAM R 135182, WAM R 127614, WAM R 152974, WAM R 151338.	FIGURE 7. Variation in Crenadactylus ocellatus (scale bar = 10 mm). From left to right: WAM R 132810, WAM R 152975, WAM R 135182, WAM R 127614, WAM R 152974, WAM R 151338.	2016-12-31	Doughty, Paul;Ellis, Ryan J.;Oliver, Paul M.		Zenodo	biologists	Doughty, Paul;Ellis, Ryan J.;Oliver, Paul M.			
03AABA6D180AAA69FF5BFA9DFB3E6323.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/262143/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.262143	FIGURE 3. Morphological variation within the Crenadactylus ocellatus species group (left to right, top to bottom): A) typical homogeneous dorsal scalation of Crenadactylus species (except C. tuberculatus), B) heterogeneous dorsal scalation of C. tuberculatus sp. nov. with enlarged tubercles, C) typical internasal configuration of Crenadactylus species (except C. horni) showing small internasal when present (upper left) or supranasals in contact (lower right), D) internasal configuration of C. horni showing enlarged internasal extending beyond posterior edge of supranasals, E) typical postmental configuration of Crenadactylus species (except C. pilbarensis) showing granular gular scales, F) postmental configuration of C. pilbarensis sp. nov. showing enlarged postmental, G) typical snout scalation in lateral view (exception C. rostralis, C. naso [part]) showing rostral-nostril contact, H) snout scalation in lateral view of C. rostralis (and C. naso [part]) showing excluded rostral contact with nostril. (Drawings: A, B – K. Aplin; C – F, R. J. Ellis; G, H – R. E. Johnstone.)	FIGURE 3. Morphological variation within the Crenadactylus ocellatus species group (left to right, top to bottom): A) typical homogeneous dorsal scalation of Crenadactylus species (except C. tuberculatus), B) heterogeneous dorsal scalation of C. tuberculatus sp. nov. with enlarged tubercles, C) typical internasal configuration of Crenadactylus species (except C. horni) showing small internasal when present (upper left) or supranasals in contact (lower right), D) internasal configuration of C. horni showing enlarged internasal extending beyond posterior edge of supranasals, E) typical postmental configuration of Crenadactylus species (except C. pilbarensis) showing granular gular scales, F) postmental configuration of C. pilbarensis sp. nov. showing enlarged postmental, G) typical snout scalation in lateral view (exception C. rostralis, C. naso [part]) showing rostral-nostril contact, H) snout scalation in lateral view of C. rostralis (and C. naso [part]) showing excluded rostral contact with nostril. (Drawings: A, B – K. Aplin; C – F, R. J. Ellis; G, H – R. E. Johnstone.)	2016-12-31	Doughty, Paul;Ellis, Ryan J.;Oliver, Paul M.		Zenodo	biologists	Doughty, Paul;Ellis, Ryan J.;Oliver, Paul M.			
03AABA6D180AAA69FF5BFA9DFB3E6323.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/262148/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.262148	FIGURE 8. Holotype of Ebenavia horni (NMV D 7533) (scale bar = 10 mm).	FIGURE 8. Holotype of Ebenavia horni (NMV D 7533) (scale bar = 10 mm).	2016-12-31	Doughty, Paul;Ellis, Ryan J.;Oliver, Paul M.		Zenodo	biologists	Doughty, Paul;Ellis, Ryan J.;Oliver, Paul M.			
03AABA6D180AAA69FF5BFA9DFB3E6323.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/262142/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.262142	FIGURE 2. Distribution of the Crenadactylus ocellatus species-group including new species described in this paper. Darker shades denote areas of high topographic complexity, lighter shades lower complexity. Colours for taxa match those in Fig. 1. Questionable type location of Ebenavia horni holotype indicated by ‘? ’.	FIGURE 2. Distribution of the Crenadactylus ocellatus species-group including new species described in this paper. Darker shades denote areas of high topographic complexity, lighter shades lower complexity. Colours for taxa match those in Fig. 1. Questionable type location of Ebenavia horni holotype indicated by ‘? ’.	2016-12-31	Doughty, Paul;Ellis, Ryan J.;Oliver, Paul M.		Zenodo	biologists	Doughty, Paul;Ellis, Ryan J.;Oliver, Paul M.			
03AABA6D180FAA76FF5BFE71FC3063B3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/262144/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.262144	FIGURE 4. Photographs of Crenadactylus ocellatus species-group members in life (left to right, top to bottom): A) C. ocellatus, Koolyanobbing, WA (photo—R. J. Ellis), B) C. horni, Trephina Gorge, NT (photo—G. M. Shea), C) occidentalis sp. nov., 70 km S Exmouth, WA (photo—G. Gaikhorst), D) C. tuberculatus sp. nov., Cape Range National Park, WA (photo—R. J. Ellis), E) C. pilbarensis sp. nov., Burrup Peninsula, WA (photo—B. Maryan), F) C. rostralis, Geikie Gorge National Park, WA (photo—P. M. Oliver), G) C. naso, Koolan Island, WA (photo—G. Gaikhorst), H) C. naso, Mitchell Plateau, WA (Photo— G. M. Shea).	FIGURE 4. Photographs of Crenadactylus ocellatus species-group members in life (left to right, top to bottom): A) C. ocellatus, Koolyanobbing, WA (photo—R. J. Ellis), B) C. horni, Trephina Gorge, NT (photo—G. M. Shea), C) occidentalis sp. nov., 70 km S Exmouth, WA (photo—G. Gaikhorst), D) C. tuberculatus sp. nov., Cape Range National Park, WA (photo—R. J. Ellis), E) C. pilbarensis sp. nov., Burrup Peninsula, WA (photo—B. Maryan), F) C. rostralis, Geikie Gorge National Park, WA (photo—P. M. Oliver), G) C. naso, Koolan Island, WA (photo—G. Gaikhorst), H) C. naso, Mitchell Plateau, WA (Photo— G. M. Shea).	2016-12-31	Doughty, Paul;Ellis, Ryan J.;Oliver, Paul M.		Zenodo	biologists	Doughty, Paul;Ellis, Ryan J.;Oliver, Paul M.			
03AABA6D180FAA76FF5BFE71FC3063B3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/262143/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.262143	FIGURE 3. Morphological variation within the Crenadactylus ocellatus species group (left to right, top to bottom): A) typical homogeneous dorsal scalation of Crenadactylus species (except C. tuberculatus), B) heterogeneous dorsal scalation of C. tuberculatus sp. nov. with enlarged tubercles, C) typical internasal configuration of Crenadactylus species (except C. horni) showing small internasal when present (upper left) or supranasals in contact (lower right), D) internasal configuration of C. horni showing enlarged internasal extending beyond posterior edge of supranasals, E) typical postmental configuration of Crenadactylus species (except C. pilbarensis) showing granular gular scales, F) postmental configuration of C. pilbarensis sp. nov. showing enlarged postmental, G) typical snout scalation in lateral view (exception C. rostralis, C. naso [part]) showing rostral-nostril contact, H) snout scalation in lateral view of C. rostralis (and C. naso [part]) showing excluded rostral contact with nostril. (Drawings: A, B – K. Aplin; C – F, R. J. Ellis; G, H – R. E. Johnstone.)	FIGURE 3. Morphological variation within the Crenadactylus ocellatus species group (left to right, top to bottom): A) typical homogeneous dorsal scalation of Crenadactylus species (except C. tuberculatus), B) heterogeneous dorsal scalation of C. tuberculatus sp. nov. with enlarged tubercles, C) typical internasal configuration of Crenadactylus species (except C. horni) showing small internasal when present (upper left) or supranasals in contact (lower right), D) internasal configuration of C. horni showing enlarged internasal extending beyond posterior edge of supranasals, E) typical postmental configuration of Crenadactylus species (except C. pilbarensis) showing granular gular scales, F) postmental configuration of C. pilbarensis sp. nov. showing enlarged postmental, G) typical snout scalation in lateral view (exception C. rostralis, C. naso [part]) showing rostral-nostril contact, H) snout scalation in lateral view of C. rostralis (and C. naso [part]) showing excluded rostral contact with nostril. (Drawings: A, B – K. Aplin; C – F, R. J. Ellis; G, H – R. E. Johnstone.)	2016-12-31	Doughty, Paul;Ellis, Ryan J.;Oliver, Paul M.		Zenodo	biologists	Doughty, Paul;Ellis, Ryan J.;Oliver, Paul M.			
03AABA6D180FAA76FF5BFE71FC3063B3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/262142/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.262142	FIGURE 2. Distribution of the Crenadactylus ocellatus species-group including new species described in this paper. Darker shades denote areas of high topographic complexity, lighter shades lower complexity. Colours for taxa match those in Fig. 1. Questionable type location of Ebenavia horni holotype indicated by ‘? ’.	FIGURE 2. Distribution of the Crenadactylus ocellatus species-group including new species described in this paper. Darker shades denote areas of high topographic complexity, lighter shades lower complexity. Colours for taxa match those in Fig. 1. Questionable type location of Ebenavia horni holotype indicated by ‘? ’.	2016-12-31	Doughty, Paul;Ellis, Ryan J.;Oliver, Paul M.		Zenodo	biologists	Doughty, Paul;Ellis, Ryan J.;Oliver, Paul M.			
03AABA6D1810AA73FF5BFDFCFE0663CF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/262143/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.262143	FIGURE 3. Morphological variation within the Crenadactylus ocellatus species group (left to right, top to bottom): A) typical homogeneous dorsal scalation of Crenadactylus species (except C. tuberculatus), B) heterogeneous dorsal scalation of C. tuberculatus sp. nov. with enlarged tubercles, C) typical internasal configuration of Crenadactylus species (except C. horni) showing small internasal when present (upper left) or supranasals in contact (lower right), D) internasal configuration of C. horni showing enlarged internasal extending beyond posterior edge of supranasals, E) typical postmental configuration of Crenadactylus species (except C. pilbarensis) showing granular gular scales, F) postmental configuration of C. pilbarensis sp. nov. showing enlarged postmental, G) typical snout scalation in lateral view (exception C. rostralis, C. naso [part]) showing rostral-nostril contact, H) snout scalation in lateral view of C. rostralis (and C. naso [part]) showing excluded rostral contact with nostril. (Drawings: A, B – K. Aplin; C – F, R. J. Ellis; G, H – R. E. Johnstone.)	FIGURE 3. Morphological variation within the Crenadactylus ocellatus species group (left to right, top to bottom): A) typical homogeneous dorsal scalation of Crenadactylus species (except C. tuberculatus), B) heterogeneous dorsal scalation of C. tuberculatus sp. nov. with enlarged tubercles, C) typical internasal configuration of Crenadactylus species (except C. horni) showing small internasal when present (upper left) or supranasals in contact (lower right), D) internasal configuration of C. horni showing enlarged internasal extending beyond posterior edge of supranasals, E) typical postmental configuration of Crenadactylus species (except C. pilbarensis) showing granular gular scales, F) postmental configuration of C. pilbarensis sp. nov. showing enlarged postmental, G) typical snout scalation in lateral view (exception C. rostralis, C. naso [part]) showing rostral-nostril contact, H) snout scalation in lateral view of C. rostralis (and C. naso [part]) showing excluded rostral contact with nostril. (Drawings: A, B – K. Aplin; C – F, R. J. Ellis; G, H – R. E. Johnstone.)	2016-12-31	Doughty, Paul;Ellis, Ryan J.;Oliver, Paul M.		Zenodo	biologists	Doughty, Paul;Ellis, Ryan J.;Oliver, Paul M.			
03AABA6D1810AA73FF5BFDFCFE0663CF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/262142/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.262142	FIGURE 2. Distribution of the Crenadactylus ocellatus species-group including new species described in this paper. Darker shades denote areas of high topographic complexity, lighter shades lower complexity. Colours for taxa match those in Fig. 1. Questionable type location of Ebenavia horni holotype indicated by ‘? ’.	FIGURE 2. Distribution of the Crenadactylus ocellatus species-group including new species described in this paper. Darker shades denote areas of high topographic complexity, lighter shades lower complexity. Colours for taxa match those in Fig. 1. Questionable type location of Ebenavia horni holotype indicated by ‘? ’.	2016-12-31	Doughty, Paul;Ellis, Ryan J.;Oliver, Paul M.		Zenodo	biologists	Doughty, Paul;Ellis, Ryan J.;Oliver, Paul M.			
03AABA6D1815AA71FF5BFE10FC0B66C3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/262143/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.262143	FIGURE 3. Morphological variation within the Crenadactylus ocellatus species group (left to right, top to bottom): A) typical homogeneous dorsal scalation of Crenadactylus species (except C. tuberculatus), B) heterogeneous dorsal scalation of C. tuberculatus sp. nov. with enlarged tubercles, C) typical internasal configuration of Crenadactylus species (except C. horni) showing small internasal when present (upper left) or supranasals in contact (lower right), D) internasal configuration of C. horni showing enlarged internasal extending beyond posterior edge of supranasals, E) typical postmental configuration of Crenadactylus species (except C. pilbarensis) showing granular gular scales, F) postmental configuration of C. pilbarensis sp. nov. showing enlarged postmental, G) typical snout scalation in lateral view (exception C. rostralis, C. naso [part]) showing rostral-nostril contact, H) snout scalation in lateral view of C. rostralis (and C. naso [part]) showing excluded rostral contact with nostril. (Drawings: A, B – K. Aplin; C – F, R. J. Ellis; G, H – R. E. Johnstone.)	FIGURE 3. Morphological variation within the Crenadactylus ocellatus species group (left to right, top to bottom): A) typical homogeneous dorsal scalation of Crenadactylus species (except C. tuberculatus), B) heterogeneous dorsal scalation of C. tuberculatus sp. nov. with enlarged tubercles, C) typical internasal configuration of Crenadactylus species (except C. horni) showing small internasal when present (upper left) or supranasals in contact (lower right), D) internasal configuration of C. horni showing enlarged internasal extending beyond posterior edge of supranasals, E) typical postmental configuration of Crenadactylus species (except C. pilbarensis) showing granular gular scales, F) postmental configuration of C. pilbarensis sp. nov. showing enlarged postmental, G) typical snout scalation in lateral view (exception C. rostralis, C. naso [part]) showing rostral-nostril contact, H) snout scalation in lateral view of C. rostralis (and C. naso [part]) showing excluded rostral contact with nostril. (Drawings: A, B – K. Aplin; C – F, R. J. Ellis; G, H – R. E. Johnstone.)	2016-12-31	Doughty, Paul;Ellis, Ryan J.;Oliver, Paul M.		Zenodo	biologists	Doughty, Paul;Ellis, Ryan J.;Oliver, Paul M.			
03AABA6D1815AA71FF5BFE10FC0B66C3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/262142/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.262142	FIGURE 2. Distribution of the Crenadactylus ocellatus species-group including new species described in this paper. Darker shades denote areas of high topographic complexity, lighter shades lower complexity. Colours for taxa match those in Fig. 1. Questionable type location of Ebenavia horni holotype indicated by ‘? ’.	FIGURE 2. Distribution of the Crenadactylus ocellatus species-group including new species described in this paper. Darker shades denote areas of high topographic complexity, lighter shades lower complexity. Colours for taxa match those in Fig. 1. Questionable type location of Ebenavia horni holotype indicated by ‘? ’.	2016-12-31	Doughty, Paul;Ellis, Ryan J.;Oliver, Paul M.		Zenodo	biologists	Doughty, Paul;Ellis, Ryan J.;Oliver, Paul M.			
03AABA6D1816AA7EFF5BFF72FC32676E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/262143/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.262143	FIGURE 3. Morphological variation within the Crenadactylus ocellatus species group (left to right, top to bottom): A) typical homogeneous dorsal scalation of Crenadactylus species (except C. tuberculatus), B) heterogeneous dorsal scalation of C. tuberculatus sp. nov. with enlarged tubercles, C) typical internasal configuration of Crenadactylus species (except C. horni) showing small internasal when present (upper left) or supranasals in contact (lower right), D) internasal configuration of C. horni showing enlarged internasal extending beyond posterior edge of supranasals, E) typical postmental configuration of Crenadactylus species (except C. pilbarensis) showing granular gular scales, F) postmental configuration of C. pilbarensis sp. nov. showing enlarged postmental, G) typical snout scalation in lateral view (exception C. rostralis, C. naso [part]) showing rostral-nostril contact, H) snout scalation in lateral view of C. rostralis (and C. naso [part]) showing excluded rostral contact with nostril. (Drawings: A, B – K. Aplin; C – F, R. J. Ellis; G, H – R. E. Johnstone.)	FIGURE 3. Morphological variation within the Crenadactylus ocellatus species group (left to right, top to bottom): A) typical homogeneous dorsal scalation of Crenadactylus species (except C. tuberculatus), B) heterogeneous dorsal scalation of C. tuberculatus sp. nov. with enlarged tubercles, C) typical internasal configuration of Crenadactylus species (except C. horni) showing small internasal when present (upper left) or supranasals in contact (lower right), D) internasal configuration of C. horni showing enlarged internasal extending beyond posterior edge of supranasals, E) typical postmental configuration of Crenadactylus species (except C. pilbarensis) showing granular gular scales, F) postmental configuration of C. pilbarensis sp. nov. showing enlarged postmental, G) typical snout scalation in lateral view (exception C. rostralis, C. naso [part]) showing rostral-nostril contact, H) snout scalation in lateral view of C. rostralis (and C. naso [part]) showing excluded rostral contact with nostril. (Drawings: A, B – K. Aplin; C – F, R. J. Ellis; G, H – R. E. Johnstone.)	2016-12-31	Doughty, Paul;Ellis, Ryan J.;Oliver, Paul M.		Zenodo	biologists	Doughty, Paul;Ellis, Ryan J.;Oliver, Paul M.			
03AABA6D1816AA7EFF5BFF72FC32676E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/262142/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.262142	FIGURE 2. Distribution of the Crenadactylus ocellatus species-group including new species described in this paper. Darker shades denote areas of high topographic complexity, lighter shades lower complexity. Colours for taxa match those in Fig. 1. Questionable type location of Ebenavia horni holotype indicated by ‘? ’.	FIGURE 2. Distribution of the Crenadactylus ocellatus species-group including new species described in this paper. Darker shades denote areas of high topographic complexity, lighter shades lower complexity. Colours for taxa match those in Fig. 1. Questionable type location of Ebenavia horni holotype indicated by ‘? ’.	2016-12-31	Doughty, Paul;Ellis, Ryan J.;Oliver, Paul M.		Zenodo	biologists	Doughty, Paul;Ellis, Ryan J.;Oliver, Paul M.			
03AABA6D181BAA7BFF5BFF72FDF66564.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/262144/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.262144	FIGURE 4. Photographs of Crenadactylus ocellatus species-group members in life (left to right, top to bottom): A) C. ocellatus, Koolyanobbing, WA (photo—R. J. Ellis), B) C. horni, Trephina Gorge, NT (photo—G. M. Shea), C) occidentalis sp. nov., 70 km S Exmouth, WA (photo—G. Gaikhorst), D) C. tuberculatus sp. nov., Cape Range National Park, WA (photo—R. J. Ellis), E) C. pilbarensis sp. nov., Burrup Peninsula, WA (photo—B. Maryan), F) C. rostralis, Geikie Gorge National Park, WA (photo—P. M. Oliver), G) C. naso, Koolan Island, WA (photo—G. Gaikhorst), H) C. naso, Mitchell Plateau, WA (Photo— G. M. Shea).	FIGURE 4. Photographs of Crenadactylus ocellatus species-group members in life (left to right, top to bottom): A) C. ocellatus, Koolyanobbing, WA (photo—R. J. Ellis), B) C. horni, Trephina Gorge, NT (photo—G. M. Shea), C) occidentalis sp. nov., 70 km S Exmouth, WA (photo—G. Gaikhorst), D) C. tuberculatus sp. nov., Cape Range National Park, WA (photo—R. J. Ellis), E) C. pilbarensis sp. nov., Burrup Peninsula, WA (photo—B. Maryan), F) C. rostralis, Geikie Gorge National Park, WA (photo—P. M. Oliver), G) C. naso, Koolan Island, WA (photo—G. Gaikhorst), H) C. naso, Mitchell Plateau, WA (Photo— G. M. Shea).	2016-12-31	Doughty, Paul;Ellis, Ryan J.;Oliver, Paul M.		Zenodo	biologists	Doughty, Paul;Ellis, Ryan J.;Oliver, Paul M.			
03AABA6D181BAA7BFF5BFF72FDF66564.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/262142/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.262142	FIGURE 2. Distribution of the Crenadactylus ocellatus species-group including new species described in this paper. Darker shades denote areas of high topographic complexity, lighter shades lower complexity. Colours for taxa match those in Fig. 1. Questionable type location of Ebenavia horni holotype indicated by ‘? ’.	FIGURE 2. Distribution of the Crenadactylus ocellatus species-group including new species described in this paper. Darker shades denote areas of high topographic complexity, lighter shades lower complexity. Colours for taxa match those in Fig. 1. Questionable type location of Ebenavia horni holotype indicated by ‘? ’.	2016-12-31	Doughty, Paul;Ellis, Ryan J.;Oliver, Paul M.		Zenodo	biologists	Doughty, Paul;Ellis, Ryan J.;Oliver, Paul M.			
