identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
03ABB470FF9CFFC4FF640F3F913E6EA6.text	03ABB470FF9CFFC4FF640F3F913E6EA6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Rubus lambertianus Seringe 1825	<div><p>Rubus lambertianus Seringe (1825: 567) (Fig. 1: C)</p><p>Type:— CHINA. Without precise locality, G. L. Staunton s. n. (holotype G!) .</p><p>— R. hunanensis Handel-Mazzetti (1933: 497), syn. nov. Type:— CHINA. Hunan: in Mischwaldern der str. St. um Hsikwangschan [Xikuangshan] bei Hsinhwa [Xinhua] Kalk, 350–570 m, 14–26 September 1918, Handel-Mazzetti 12644 (holotype WU!).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03ABB470FF9CFFC4FF640F3F913E6EA6	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Xiong, Xian-Hua;Gao, Xin-Fen	Xiong, Xian-Hua, Gao, Xin-Fen (2022): Rubus neohunanensis, a new name for a bramble taxon misidentified as R. hunanensis in previous Chinese taxonomic literature. Phytotaxa 561 (1): 117-120, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.561.1.12
03ABB470FF9CFFC4FF640BE3967269E9.text	03ABB470FF9CFFC4FF640BE3967269E9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Rubus neohunanensis X. H. Xiong & X. F. Gao 2022	<div><p>Rubus neohunanensis X. H. Xiong &amp; X. F. Gao, nom. nov. (Fig. 1: B)</p><p>≡ R. buergeri Miquel (1867: 36) var. viridifolius Handel-Mazzetti (1933: 497) .</p><p>Type:— CHINA. Hunan: Wukang [Wugang], Yun-schan [ Yunshan], Tempel Gwanyin-go [ Guanyin Temple], 1190 m, 13 July 1918, Handel-Mazzetti 12289 (holotype WU! ; isotypes A!, E!) .</p><p>— R. hunanensis auct. non Handel-Mazzetti (1933: 497): Lu &amp; Yu (1985: 171), Lu &amp; Boufford (2003: 258).</p><p>Etymology: —The specific epithet is derived from the prefix neo-, meaning new, and hunanensis, the epithet of HandelMazzetti (1933), meaning Hunan Province of China.</p><p>Distribution: —The species is endemic to China, occurring in Chongqing, Guizhou, Guangxi, Guangdong, Hunan, Hubei, Jiangxi, Fujian, Zhejiang. It was observed to grow in montane valleys, forests and grasslands at elevations from 300 m to 2500 m.</p><p>Notes: — Rubus neohunanensis is morphologically similar to R. buergeri Miquel (1867: 36) (Fig. 1: D) in shrubs low, climbing or prostrate, leaves abaxially tomentose and gradually deciduous. However, R. neohunanensis can be distinguished from R. buergeri by the following morphological characters: branchlets, petioles and inflorescences thinly pubescent (vs. tomentose-villous); sepals broadly ovate (vs. lanceolate or ovate-lanceolate); outer sepals pinnate-laciniate on margin (vs. only apically lobed); leaf blade relatively larger, 8–15 cm in diam. (vs. 4–11 cm).</p><p>Additional specimens examined: — CHINA. Chongqing: Wulong, C. L. Li et al. 0461 (PE) . Guizhou: Qingzhen, S. W. Teng 1419 (IBSC) . Guangxi: Bin long, Miu shan, R. C. Ching 6061 (PE). Damiaoshan, S. Q. Chen 14437 (IBK) . Guangdong: Lechang, Nanling Exped. 4128 (IBSC). Ruyuan, Z. Huang 44050 (IBSC) . Hunan: Sangzhi, L. Q. Li 128 (PE). Wugang, Y. F. Deng 0034 (PE) . Hubei: Xuan’en, Y. M. Wang 4807 (PE) . Jiangxi: Jiujiang, Mt. Lushan, X. H. Xiong 1595 (CDBI) . Fujian: Taining, X. L. Hou 90928 (AU). Wuyishan, Wuyi Exped. 00093 (PE) . Zhejiang: Qingyuan, X. H. Xiong 1955 (CDBI). Wencheng, X. H. Xiong 1833 (CDBI) .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03ABB470FF9CFFC4FF640BE3967269E9	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Xiong, Xian-Hua;Gao, Xin-Fen	Xiong, Xian-Hua, Gao, Xin-Fen (2022): Rubus neohunanensis, a new name for a bramble taxon misidentified as R. hunanensis in previous Chinese taxonomic literature. Phytotaxa 561 (1): 117-120, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.561.1.12
