taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
03A987A17B45AF6566C44212FB05DEA9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792059/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792059	FIGURE 2. Aschemonella monilis Gooday & Holzmann 2017. A–D, Sequenced specimens. A, Dark specimen attached to nodule; RC1056 (BC026). B, Interior of test fragment with red granellare (after removal of most pieces for sequencing) and dark stercomare; RC0056 (BC001). C, Fragment with two segments; RC0490B (BC010).D, E, RC1900.1 (BC045). D, Fragment with broken segment containing granellare. E, Detail of dome and tubular apertural structure. F, G, Specimens without cytoplasm; RC1900.2 (BC045). F, Complete fragment. G, Detail of apertural structures. No scale is available for B.	FIGURE 2. Aschemonella monilis Gooday & Holzmann 2017. A–D, Sequenced specimens. A, Dark specimen attached to nodule; RC1056 (BC026). B, Interior of test fragment with red granellare (after removal of most pieces for sequencing) and dark stercomare; RC0056 (BC001). C, Fragment with two segments; RC0490B (BC010).D, E, RC1900.1 (BC045). D, Fragment with broken segment containing granellare. E, Detail of dome and tubular apertural structure. F, G, Specimens without cytoplasm; RC1900.2 (BC045). F, Complete fragment. G, Detail of apertural structures. No scale is available for B.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
03A987A17B45AF6566C44212FB05DEA9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792057/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792057	FIGURE 1. PhyML phylogenetic tree based on the 3'end fragment of the SSU rRNA gene, showing the evolutionary relationships of 79 foraminiferal sequences belonging to monothalamids. Specimens marked in bold indicate those for which sequences were acquired during the present study. The tree is unrooted. Specimens are identified by their accession numbers. Numbers at nodes indicate bootstrap values (BVs). Only BVs>70% are shown.	FIGURE 1. PhyML phylogenetic tree based on the 3'end fragment of the SSU rRNA gene, showing the evolutionary relationships of 79 foraminiferal sequences belonging to monothalamids. Specimens marked in bold indicate those for which sequences were acquired during the present study. The tree is unrooted. Specimens are identified by their accession numbers. Numbers at nodes indicate bootstrap values (BVs). Only BVs>70% are shown.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
03A987A17B45AF6566C44212FB05DEA9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792061/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792061	FIGURE 3. Aschemonella tani Gooday & Holzmann sp. nov.; holotype RC1555 (BC036). A, Shipboard photograph showing grouping of structures on nodule summit; numbers 1–3 identify parts illustrated in other photographs. B–F, Laboratory photographs. B, Part 1 from top of nodule. C, Part 2. D, E, Part 3 viewed from different sides. F, Detail of Part 3.	FIGURE 3. Aschemonella tani Gooday & Holzmann sp. nov.; holotype RC1555 (BC036). A, Shipboard photograph showing grouping of structures on nodule summit; numbers 1–3 identify parts illustrated in other photographs. B–F, Laboratory photographs. B, Part 1 from top of nodule. C, Part 2. D, E, Part 3 viewed from different sides. F, Detail of Part 3.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
03A987A17B45AF6566C44212FB05DEA9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792063/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792063	FIGURE 4. Aschemonella tani Gooday & Holzmann sp. nov., laboratory photographs of fragments from holotype; RC1555 (BC036). A, Detail of Part 1 from summit of nodule showing dark stercomare seen through wall of test. B, Part 2 broken open to expose stercomare. C, Detail of stercomare in Part 2. D, Granellare strands.	FIGURE 4. Aschemonella tani Gooday & Holzmann sp. nov., laboratory photographs of fragments from holotype; RC1555 (BC036). A, Detail of Part 1 from summit of nodule showing dark stercomare seen through wall of test. B, Part 2 broken open to expose stercomare. C, Detail of stercomare in Part 2. D, Granellare strands.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
03A987A17B45AF6566C44212FB05DEA9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792067/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792067	FIGURE 5. Abyssalia foliformis Gooday & Holzmann 2020; RC0612 (BC015). A, Shipboard photograph of unique test fragment. B–F, Laboratory photographs of test fragment; the stercomare had been lost from the central part of the fragment. C, D, Details of fragment showing granellare. E, Fragments of cytoplasm detached from test; note that the fragments are partly attached to sponge spicules. F, Loose stercomare pellets that had fallen out of the test.	FIGURE 5. Abyssalia foliformis Gooday & Holzmann 2020; RC0612 (BC015). A, Shipboard photograph of unique test fragment. B–F, Laboratory photographs of test fragment; the stercomare had been lost from the central part of the fragment. C, D, Details of fragment showing granellare. E, Fragments of cytoplasm detached from test; note that the fragments are partly attached to sponge spicules. F, Loose stercomare pellets that had fallen out of the test.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
03A987A17B45AF6566C44212FB05DEA9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792071/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792071	FIGURE 6. Abyssalia aff. foliformis, shipboard photographs; RC0615 (BC011).A, B, Two different side views. C, Test viewed from above. D–F, Details of test; the yellow tube in E is probably part of a Saccorhiza ramosa test.	FIGURE 6. Abyssalia aff. foliformis, shipboard photographs; RC0615 (BC011).A, B, Two different side views. C, Test viewed from above. D–F, Details of test; the yellow tube in E is probably part of a Saccorhiza ramosa test.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
03A987A17B45AF6566C44212FB05DEA9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792073/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792073	FIGURE 7. Abyssalia aff. foliformis, laboratory photographs; Specimen RC0615 (BC011). A, Fragment. B, Detail of edge. C–D, Broken edge showing granellare embedded in dak stercomare masses.	FIGURE 7. Abyssalia aff. foliformis, laboratory photographs; Specimen RC0615 (BC011). A, Fragment. B, Detail of edge. C–D, Broken edge showing granellare embedded in dak stercomare masses.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
03A987A17B45AF6566C44212FB05DEA9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792079/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792079	FIGURE 8. Claraclippia seminuda Gooday & Holzmann gen. & sp. nov., shipboard photographs; holotype, RC0202 (BC005). A, B, Test photographed on the surface of the box core immediately after collection. C, D, Test removed from box core. E, F, Details of test; note the small open spaces.Arrows indicate the same feature in A–D; asterisk indicate point of attachment. Scales are not available for B and C.	FIGURE 8. Claraclippia seminuda Gooday & Holzmann gen. & sp. nov., shipboard photographs; holotype, RC0202 (BC005). A, B, Test photographed on the surface of the box core immediately after collection. C, D, Test removed from box core. E, F, Details of test; note the small open spaces.Arrows indicate the same feature in A–D; asterisk indicate point of attachment. Scales are not available for B and C.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
03A987A17B44AF6A66C44747FEE7D985.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792061/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792061	FIGURE 3. Aschemonella tani Gooday & Holzmann sp. nov.; holotype RC1555 (BC036). A, Shipboard photograph showing grouping of structures on nodule summit; numbers 1–3 identify parts illustrated in other photographs. B–F, Laboratory photographs. B, Part 1 from top of nodule. C, Part 2. D, E, Part 3 viewed from different sides. F, Detail of Part 3.	FIGURE 3. Aschemonella tani Gooday & Holzmann sp. nov.; holotype RC1555 (BC036). A, Shipboard photograph showing grouping of structures on nodule summit; numbers 1–3 identify parts illustrated in other photographs. B–F, Laboratory photographs. B, Part 1 from top of nodule. C, Part 2. D, E, Part 3 viewed from different sides. F, Detail of Part 3.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
03A987A17B44AF6A66C44747FEE7D985.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792063/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792063	FIGURE 4. Aschemonella tani Gooday & Holzmann sp. nov., laboratory photographs of fragments from holotype; RC1555 (BC036). A, Detail of Part 1 from summit of nodule showing dark stercomare seen through wall of test. B, Part 2 broken open to expose stercomare. C, Detail of stercomare in Part 2. D, Granellare strands.	FIGURE 4. Aschemonella tani Gooday & Holzmann sp. nov., laboratory photographs of fragments from holotype; RC1555 (BC036). A, Detail of Part 1 from summit of nodule showing dark stercomare seen through wall of test. B, Part 2 broken open to expose stercomare. C, Detail of stercomare in Part 2. D, Granellare strands.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
03A987A17B44AF6A66C44747FEE7D985.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792057/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792057	FIGURE 1. PhyML phylogenetic tree based on the 3'end fragment of the SSU rRNA gene, showing the evolutionary relationships of 79 foraminiferal sequences belonging to monothalamids. Specimens marked in bold indicate those for which sequences were acquired during the present study. The tree is unrooted. Specimens are identified by their accession numbers. Numbers at nodes indicate bootstrap values (BVs). Only BVs>70% are shown.	FIGURE 1. PhyML phylogenetic tree based on the 3'end fragment of the SSU rRNA gene, showing the evolutionary relationships of 79 foraminiferal sequences belonging to monothalamids. Specimens marked in bold indicate those for which sequences were acquired during the present study. The tree is unrooted. Specimens are identified by their accession numbers. Numbers at nodes indicate bootstrap values (BVs). Only BVs>70% are shown.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
03A987A17B49AF6966C4453DFCB4DE05.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792059/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792059	FIGURE 2. Aschemonella monilis Gooday & Holzmann 2017. A–D, Sequenced specimens. A, Dark specimen attached to nodule; RC1056 (BC026). B, Interior of test fragment with red granellare (after removal of most pieces for sequencing) and dark stercomare; RC0056 (BC001). C, Fragment with two segments; RC0490B (BC010).D, E, RC1900.1 (BC045). D, Fragment with broken segment containing granellare. E, Detail of dome and tubular apertural structure. F, G, Specimens without cytoplasm; RC1900.2 (BC045). F, Complete fragment. G, Detail of apertural structures. No scale is available for B.	FIGURE 2. Aschemonella monilis Gooday & Holzmann 2017. A–D, Sequenced specimens. A, Dark specimen attached to nodule; RC1056 (BC026). B, Interior of test fragment with red granellare (after removal of most pieces for sequencing) and dark stercomare; RC0056 (BC001). C, Fragment with two segments; RC0490B (BC010).D, E, RC1900.1 (BC045). D, Fragment with broken segment containing granellare. E, Detail of dome and tubular apertural structure. F, G, Specimens without cytoplasm; RC1900.2 (BC045). F, Complete fragment. G, Detail of apertural structures. No scale is available for B.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
03A987A17B48AF6F66C440E8FC9DDD01.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792067/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792067	FIGURE 5. Abyssalia foliformis Gooday & Holzmann 2020; RC0612 (BC015). A, Shipboard photograph of unique test fragment. B–F, Laboratory photographs of test fragment; the stercomare had been lost from the central part of the fragment. C, D, Details of fragment showing granellare. E, Fragments of cytoplasm detached from test; note that the fragments are partly attached to sponge spicules. F, Loose stercomare pellets that had fallen out of the test.	FIGURE 5. Abyssalia foliformis Gooday & Holzmann 2020; RC0612 (BC015). A, Shipboard photograph of unique test fragment. B–F, Laboratory photographs of test fragment; the stercomare had been lost from the central part of the fragment. C, D, Details of fragment showing granellare. E, Fragments of cytoplasm detached from test; note that the fragments are partly attached to sponge spicules. F, Loose stercomare pellets that had fallen out of the test.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
03A987A17B48AF6F66C440E8FC9DDD01.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792081/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792081	FIGURE 9. Claraclippia seminuda Gooday & Holzmann gen. & sp. nov.; holotype, RC0202 (BC005). A, B, Laboratory photographs taken in Geneva; details of test surface showing stercomate branches, reddish granellare strands, and the surface veneer of fine particles, which was then still partially intact. C–F, Laboratory photographs of fragments consisting mainly of stercomare branches; the photographs were taken in Southampton, by which time the surface veneer of fine particles had largely disappeared.	FIGURE 9. Claraclippia seminuda Gooday & Holzmann gen. & sp. nov.; holotype, RC0202 (BC005). A, B, Laboratory photographs taken in Geneva; details of test surface showing stercomate branches, reddish granellare strands, and the surface veneer of fine particles, which was then still partially intact. C–F, Laboratory photographs of fragments consisting mainly of stercomare branches; the photographs were taken in Southampton, by which time the surface veneer of fine particles had largely disappeared.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
03A987A17B48AF6F66C440E8FC9DDD01.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792083/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792083	FIGURE 10. Stereodikyoma mollis Gooday & Holzmann gen. & sp. nov. A, B, Holotype, RC1623 (BC039); shipboard photographs of intact specimen attached to nodule. C–F, Paratype, RC1697 (BC040). C, D, Shipboard photographs. E, F, Laboratory photographs (Geneva) of the two largest fragments.	FIGURE 10. Stereodikyoma mollis Gooday & Holzmann gen. & sp. nov. A, B, Holotype, RC1623 (BC039); shipboard photographs of intact specimen attached to nodule. C–F, Paratype, RC1697 (BC040). C, D, Shipboard photographs. E, F, Laboratory photographs (Geneva) of the two largest fragments.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
03A987A17B48AF6F66C440E8FC9DDD01.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792071/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792071	FIGURE 6. Abyssalia aff. foliformis, shipboard photographs; RC0615 (BC011).A, B, Two different side views. C, Test viewed from above. D–F, Details of test; the yellow tube in E is probably part of a Saccorhiza ramosa test.	FIGURE 6. Abyssalia aff. foliformis, shipboard photographs; RC0615 (BC011).A, B, Two different side views. C, Test viewed from above. D–F, Details of test; the yellow tube in E is probably part of a Saccorhiza ramosa test.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
03A987A17B4FAF6D66C444B1FEC0DF03.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792071/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792071	FIGURE 6. Abyssalia aff. foliformis, shipboard photographs; RC0615 (BC011).A, B, Two different side views. C, Test viewed from above. D–F, Details of test; the yellow tube in E is probably part of a Saccorhiza ramosa test.	FIGURE 6. Abyssalia aff. foliformis, shipboard photographs; RC0615 (BC011).A, B, Two different side views. C, Test viewed from above. D–F, Details of test; the yellow tube in E is probably part of a Saccorhiza ramosa test.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
03A987A17B4FAF6D66C444B1FEC0DF03.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792073/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792073	FIGURE 7. Abyssalia aff. foliformis, laboratory photographs; Specimen RC0615 (BC011). A, Fragment. B, Detail of edge. C–D, Broken edge showing granellare embedded in dak stercomare masses.	FIGURE 7. Abyssalia aff. foliformis, laboratory photographs; Specimen RC0615 (BC011). A, Fragment. B, Detail of edge. C–D, Broken edge showing granellare embedded in dak stercomare masses.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
03A987A17B4FAF6D66C444B1FEC0DF03.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792061/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792061	FIGURE 3. Aschemonella tani Gooday & Holzmann sp. nov.; holotype RC1555 (BC036). A, Shipboard photograph showing grouping of structures on nodule summit; numbers 1–3 identify parts illustrated in other photographs. B–F, Laboratory photographs. B, Part 1 from top of nodule. C, Part 2. D, E, Part 3 viewed from different sides. F, Detail of Part 3.	FIGURE 3. Aschemonella tani Gooday & Holzmann sp. nov.; holotype RC1555 (BC036). A, Shipboard photograph showing grouping of structures on nodule summit; numbers 1–3 identify parts illustrated in other photographs. B–F, Laboratory photographs. B, Part 1 from top of nodule. C, Part 2. D, E, Part 3 viewed from different sides. F, Detail of Part 3.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
03A987A17B4CAF7166C44240FC31DF9D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792079/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792079	FIGURE 8. Claraclippia seminuda Gooday & Holzmann gen. & sp. nov., shipboard photographs; holotype, RC0202 (BC005). A, B, Test photographed on the surface of the box core immediately after collection. C, D, Test removed from box core. E, F, Details of test; note the small open spaces.Arrows indicate the same feature in A–D; asterisk indicate point of attachment. Scales are not available for B and C.	FIGURE 8. Claraclippia seminuda Gooday & Holzmann gen. & sp. nov., shipboard photographs; holotype, RC0202 (BC005). A, B, Test photographed on the surface of the box core immediately after collection. C, D, Test removed from box core. E, F, Details of test; note the small open spaces.Arrows indicate the same feature in A–D; asterisk indicate point of attachment. Scales are not available for B and C.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
03A987A17B4CAF7166C44240FC31DF9D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792081/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792081	FIGURE 9. Claraclippia seminuda Gooday & Holzmann gen. & sp. nov.; holotype, RC0202 (BC005). A, B, Laboratory photographs taken in Geneva; details of test surface showing stercomate branches, reddish granellare strands, and the surface veneer of fine particles, which was then still partially intact. C–F, Laboratory photographs of fragments consisting mainly of stercomare branches; the photographs were taken in Southampton, by which time the surface veneer of fine particles had largely disappeared.	FIGURE 9. Claraclippia seminuda Gooday & Holzmann gen. & sp. nov.; holotype, RC0202 (BC005). A, B, Laboratory photographs taken in Geneva; details of test surface showing stercomate branches, reddish granellare strands, and the surface veneer of fine particles, which was then still partially intact. C–F, Laboratory photographs of fragments consisting mainly of stercomare branches; the photographs were taken in Southampton, by which time the surface veneer of fine particles had largely disappeared.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
03A987A17B4CAF7166C44240FC31DF9D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792057/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792057	FIGURE 1. PhyML phylogenetic tree based on the 3'end fragment of the SSU rRNA gene, showing the evolutionary relationships of 79 foraminiferal sequences belonging to monothalamids. Specimens marked in bold indicate those for which sequences were acquired during the present study. The tree is unrooted. Specimens are identified by their accession numbers. Numbers at nodes indicate bootstrap values (BVs). Only BVs>70% are shown.	FIGURE 1. PhyML phylogenetic tree based on the 3'end fragment of the SSU rRNA gene, showing the evolutionary relationships of 79 foraminiferal sequences belonging to monothalamids. Specimens marked in bold indicate those for which sequences were acquired during the present study. The tree is unrooted. Specimens are identified by their accession numbers. Numbers at nodes indicate bootstrap values (BVs). Only BVs>70% are shown.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
03A987A17B51AF7066C44755FA87DB1D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792057/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792057	FIGURE 1. PhyML phylogenetic tree based on the 3'end fragment of the SSU rRNA gene, showing the evolutionary relationships of 79 foraminiferal sequences belonging to monothalamids. Specimens marked in bold indicate those for which sequences were acquired during the present study. The tree is unrooted. Specimens are identified by their accession numbers. Numbers at nodes indicate bootstrap values (BVs). Only BVs>70% are shown.	FIGURE 1. PhyML phylogenetic tree based on the 3'end fragment of the SSU rRNA gene, showing the evolutionary relationships of 79 foraminiferal sequences belonging to monothalamids. Specimens marked in bold indicate those for which sequences were acquired during the present study. The tree is unrooted. Specimens are identified by their accession numbers. Numbers at nodes indicate bootstrap values (BVs). Only BVs>70% are shown.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
03A987A17B50AF7666C442D5FECFDB1D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792083/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792083	FIGURE 10. Stereodikyoma mollis Gooday & Holzmann gen. & sp. nov. A, B, Holotype, RC1623 (BC039); shipboard photographs of intact specimen attached to nodule. C–F, Paratype, RC1697 (BC040). C, D, Shipboard photographs. E, F, Laboratory photographs (Geneva) of the two largest fragments.	FIGURE 10. Stereodikyoma mollis Gooday & Holzmann gen. & sp. nov. A, B, Holotype, RC1623 (BC039); shipboard photographs of intact specimen attached to nodule. C–F, Paratype, RC1697 (BC040). C, D, Shipboard photographs. E, F, Laboratory photographs (Geneva) of the two largest fragments.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
03A987A17B50AF7666C442D5FECFDB1D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792061/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792061	FIGURE 3. Aschemonella tani Gooday & Holzmann sp. nov.; holotype RC1555 (BC036). A, Shipboard photograph showing grouping of structures on nodule summit; numbers 1–3 identify parts illustrated in other photographs. B–F, Laboratory photographs. B, Part 1 from top of nodule. C, Part 2. D, E, Part 3 viewed from different sides. F, Detail of Part 3.	FIGURE 3. Aschemonella tani Gooday & Holzmann sp. nov.; holotype RC1555 (BC036). A, Shipboard photograph showing grouping of structures on nodule summit; numbers 1–3 identify parts illustrated in other photographs. B–F, Laboratory photographs. B, Part 1 from top of nodule. C, Part 2. D, E, Part 3 viewed from different sides. F, Detail of Part 3.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
03A987A17B56AF7666C442CDFBA5DFEF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792085/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792085	FIGURE 11. Shinkaiya contorta Gooday & Holzmann 2017; Specimen RC0160 (BC004).A, Shipboard photograph of fragment. B–E, Laboratory photographs. B, Collection of fragments. C, Broken fragment showing interior. D, Detail of broken fragment with exposed interior. E, Complete fragment. E, Section of test exposed on broken surface.	FIGURE 11. Shinkaiya contorta Gooday & Holzmann 2017; Specimen RC0160 (BC004).A, Shipboard photograph of fragment. B–E, Laboratory photographs. B, Collection of fragments. C, Broken fragment showing interior. D, Detail of broken fragment with exposed interior. E, Complete fragment. E, Section of test exposed on broken surface.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
03A987A17B56AF7666C442CDFBA5DFEF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792087/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792087	FIGURE 12. Shinkaiya contorta Gooday & Holzmann 2017; Laboratory photographs; specimen RC0160 (BC004). A, Exterior of fragment. B, Broken edge. C–E, Interior surfaces of fragments showing stercomare. F, Granellare fragments with attached pieces of stercomare. G, Fragment with partially exposed interior. Scales were not available for D and E.	FIGURE 12. Shinkaiya contorta Gooday & Holzmann 2017; Laboratory photographs; specimen RC0160 (BC004). A, Exterior of fragment. B, Broken edge. C–E, Interior surfaces of fragments showing stercomare. F, Granellare fragments with attached pieces of stercomare. G, Fragment with partially exposed interior. Scales were not available for D and E.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
03A987A17B56AF7666C442CDFBA5DFEF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792059/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792059	FIGURE 2. Aschemonella monilis Gooday & Holzmann 2017. A–D, Sequenced specimens. A, Dark specimen attached to nodule; RC1056 (BC026). B, Interior of test fragment with red granellare (after removal of most pieces for sequencing) and dark stercomare; RC0056 (BC001). C, Fragment with two segments; RC0490B (BC010).D, E, RC1900.1 (BC045). D, Fragment with broken segment containing granellare. E, Detail of dome and tubular apertural structure. F, G, Specimens without cytoplasm; RC1900.2 (BC045). F, Complete fragment. G, Detail of apertural structures. No scale is available for B.	FIGURE 2. Aschemonella monilis Gooday & Holzmann 2017. A–D, Sequenced specimens. A, Dark specimen attached to nodule; RC1056 (BC026). B, Interior of test fragment with red granellare (after removal of most pieces for sequencing) and dark stercomare; RC0056 (BC001). C, Fragment with two segments; RC0490B (BC010).D, E, RC1900.1 (BC045). D, Fragment with broken segment containing granellare. E, Detail of dome and tubular apertural structure. F, G, Specimens without cytoplasm; RC1900.2 (BC045). F, Complete fragment. G, Detail of apertural structures. No scale is available for B.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
03A987A17B56AF7A66C4469AFD4FDAD9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792089/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792089	FIGURE 13. Psammina multiloculata Kamenskaya, Gooday & Tendal, 2015; specimen RC1019 (BC025). A–C, Shipboard photographs showing side views of test and view from above. D–H, Laboratory photographs. D, Entire specimen; the test had been damaged since it was photographed on the ship. E, Detail of damaged side plate. F, Detail of surface of main plate showing external expression of internal compartments. G, Detail of edge of plate showing stercomare. H, Broken edge showing cross sections of compartments.	FIGURE 13. Psammina multiloculata Kamenskaya, Gooday & Tendal, 2015; specimen RC1019 (BC025). A–C, Shipboard photographs showing side views of test and view from above. D–H, Laboratory photographs. D, Entire specimen; the test had been damaged since it was photographed on the ship. E, Detail of damaged side plate. F, Detail of surface of main plate showing external expression of internal compartments. G, Detail of edge of plate showing stercomare. H, Broken edge showing cross sections of compartments.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
03A987A17B56AF7A66C4469AFD4FDAD9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792059/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792059	FIGURE 2. Aschemonella monilis Gooday & Holzmann 2017. A–D, Sequenced specimens. A, Dark specimen attached to nodule; RC1056 (BC026). B, Interior of test fragment with red granellare (after removal of most pieces for sequencing) and dark stercomare; RC0056 (BC001). C, Fragment with two segments; RC0490B (BC010).D, E, RC1900.1 (BC045). D, Fragment with broken segment containing granellare. E, Detail of dome and tubular apertural structure. F, G, Specimens without cytoplasm; RC1900.2 (BC045). F, Complete fragment. G, Detail of apertural structures. No scale is available for B.	FIGURE 2. Aschemonella monilis Gooday & Holzmann 2017. A–D, Sequenced specimens. A, Dark specimen attached to nodule; RC1056 (BC026). B, Interior of test fragment with red granellare (after removal of most pieces for sequencing) and dark stercomare; RC0056 (BC001). C, Fragment with two segments; RC0490B (BC010).D, E, RC1900.1 (BC045). D, Fragment with broken segment containing granellare. E, Detail of dome and tubular apertural structure. F, G, Specimens without cytoplasm; RC1900.2 (BC045). F, Complete fragment. G, Detail of apertural structures. No scale is available for B.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
03A987A17B56AF7A66C4469AFD4FDAD9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792061/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792061	FIGURE 3. Aschemonella tani Gooday & Holzmann sp. nov.; holotype RC1555 (BC036). A, Shipboard photograph showing grouping of structures on nodule summit; numbers 1–3 identify parts illustrated in other photographs. B–F, Laboratory photographs. B, Part 1 from top of nodule. C, Part 2. D, E, Part 3 viewed from different sides. F, Detail of Part 3.	FIGURE 3. Aschemonella tani Gooday & Holzmann sp. nov.; holotype RC1555 (BC036). A, Shipboard photograph showing grouping of structures on nodule summit; numbers 1–3 identify parts illustrated in other photographs. B–F, Laboratory photographs. B, Part 1 from top of nodule. C, Part 2. D, E, Part 3 viewed from different sides. F, Detail of Part 3.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
03A987A17B56AF7A66C4469AFD4FDAD9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792057/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792057	FIGURE 1. PhyML phylogenetic tree based on the 3'end fragment of the SSU rRNA gene, showing the evolutionary relationships of 79 foraminiferal sequences belonging to monothalamids. Specimens marked in bold indicate those for which sequences were acquired during the present study. The tree is unrooted. Specimens are identified by their accession numbers. Numbers at nodes indicate bootstrap values (BVs). Only BVs>70% are shown.	FIGURE 1. PhyML phylogenetic tree based on the 3'end fragment of the SSU rRNA gene, showing the evolutionary relationships of 79 foraminiferal sequences belonging to monothalamids. Specimens marked in bold indicate those for which sequences were acquired during the present study. The tree is unrooted. Specimens are identified by their accession numbers. Numbers at nodes indicate bootstrap values (BVs). Only BVs>70% are shown.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
03A987A17B56AF7A66C4469AFD4FDAD9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792063/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792063	FIGURE 4. Aschemonella tani Gooday & Holzmann sp. nov., laboratory photographs of fragments from holotype; RC1555 (BC036). A, Detail of Part 1 from summit of nodule showing dark stercomare seen through wall of test. B, Part 2 broken open to expose stercomare. C, Detail of stercomare in Part 2. D, Granellare strands.	FIGURE 4. Aschemonella tani Gooday & Holzmann sp. nov., laboratory photographs of fragments from holotype; RC1555 (BC036). A, Detail of Part 1 from summit of nodule showing dark stercomare seen through wall of test. B, Part 2 broken open to expose stercomare. C, Detail of stercomare in Part 2. D, Granellare strands.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
03A987A17B5AAF7966C44388FD29D985.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792063/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792063	FIGURE 4. Aschemonella tani Gooday & Holzmann sp. nov., laboratory photographs of fragments from holotype; RC1555 (BC036). A, Detail of Part 1 from summit of nodule showing dark stercomare seen through wall of test. B, Part 2 broken open to expose stercomare. C, Detail of stercomare in Part 2. D, Granellare strands.	FIGURE 4. Aschemonella tani Gooday & Holzmann sp. nov., laboratory photographs of fragments from holotype; RC1555 (BC036). A, Detail of Part 1 from summit of nodule showing dark stercomare seen through wall of test. B, Part 2 broken open to expose stercomare. C, Detail of stercomare in Part 2. D, Granellare strands.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
03A987A17B5AAF7966C44388FD29D985.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792067/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792067	FIGURE 5. Abyssalia foliformis Gooday & Holzmann 2020; RC0612 (BC015). A, Shipboard photograph of unique test fragment. B–F, Laboratory photographs of test fragment; the stercomare had been lost from the central part of the fragment. C, D, Details of fragment showing granellare. E, Fragments of cytoplasm detached from test; note that the fragments are partly attached to sponge spicules. F, Loose stercomare pellets that had fallen out of the test.	FIGURE 5. Abyssalia foliformis Gooday & Holzmann 2020; RC0612 (BC015). A, Shipboard photograph of unique test fragment. B–F, Laboratory photographs of test fragment; the stercomare had been lost from the central part of the fragment. C, D, Details of fragment showing granellare. E, Fragments of cytoplasm detached from test; note that the fragments are partly attached to sponge spicules. F, Loose stercomare pellets that had fallen out of the test.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
03A987A17B59AF7966C44134FD13DDBC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792071/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792071	FIGURE 6. Abyssalia aff. foliformis, shipboard photographs; RC0615 (BC011).A, B, Two different side views. C, Test viewed from above. D–F, Details of test; the yellow tube in E is probably part of a Saccorhiza ramosa test.	FIGURE 6. Abyssalia aff. foliformis, shipboard photographs; RC0615 (BC011).A, B, Two different side views. C, Test viewed from above. D–F, Details of test; the yellow tube in E is probably part of a Saccorhiza ramosa test.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
03A987A17B59AF7966C44134FD13DDBC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792061/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792061	FIGURE 3. Aschemonella tani Gooday & Holzmann sp. nov.; holotype RC1555 (BC036). A, Shipboard photograph showing grouping of structures on nodule summit; numbers 1–3 identify parts illustrated in other photographs. B–F, Laboratory photographs. B, Part 1 from top of nodule. C, Part 2. D, E, Part 3 viewed from different sides. F, Detail of Part 3.	FIGURE 3. Aschemonella tani Gooday & Holzmann sp. nov.; holotype RC1555 (BC036). A, Shipboard photograph showing grouping of structures on nodule summit; numbers 1–3 identify parts illustrated in other photographs. B–F, Laboratory photographs. B, Part 1 from top of nodule. C, Part 2. D, E, Part 3 viewed from different sides. F, Detail of Part 3.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
03A987A17B59AF7966C44134FD13DDBC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792063/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792063	FIGURE 4. Aschemonella tani Gooday & Holzmann sp. nov., laboratory photographs of fragments from holotype; RC1555 (BC036). A, Detail of Part 1 from summit of nodule showing dark stercomare seen through wall of test. B, Part 2 broken open to expose stercomare. C, Detail of stercomare in Part 2. D, Granellare strands.	FIGURE 4. Aschemonella tani Gooday & Holzmann sp. nov., laboratory photographs of fragments from holotype; RC1555 (BC036). A, Detail of Part 1 from summit of nodule showing dark stercomare seen through wall of test. B, Part 2 broken open to expose stercomare. C, Detail of stercomare in Part 2. D, Granellare strands.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
03A987A17B59AF7966C44134FD13DDBC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792067/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792067	FIGURE 5. Abyssalia foliformis Gooday & Holzmann 2020; RC0612 (BC015). A, Shipboard photograph of unique test fragment. B–F, Laboratory photographs of test fragment; the stercomare had been lost from the central part of the fragment. C, D, Details of fragment showing granellare. E, Fragments of cytoplasm detached from test; note that the fragments are partly attached to sponge spicules. F, Loose stercomare pellets that had fallen out of the test.	FIGURE 5. Abyssalia foliformis Gooday & Holzmann 2020; RC0612 (BC015). A, Shipboard photograph of unique test fragment. B–F, Laboratory photographs of test fragment; the stercomare had been lost from the central part of the fragment. C, D, Details of fragment showing granellare. E, Fragments of cytoplasm detached from test; note that the fragments are partly attached to sponge spicules. F, Loose stercomare pellets that had fallen out of the test.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
03A987A17B59AF7966C44134FD13DDBC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792057/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792057	FIGURE 1. PhyML phylogenetic tree based on the 3'end fragment of the SSU rRNA gene, showing the evolutionary relationships of 79 foraminiferal sequences belonging to monothalamids. Specimens marked in bold indicate those for which sequences were acquired during the present study. The tree is unrooted. Specimens are identified by their accession numbers. Numbers at nodes indicate bootstrap values (BVs). Only BVs>70% are shown.	FIGURE 1. PhyML phylogenetic tree based on the 3'end fragment of the SSU rRNA gene, showing the evolutionary relationships of 79 foraminiferal sequences belonging to monothalamids. Specimens marked in bold indicate those for which sequences were acquired during the present study. The tree is unrooted. Specimens are identified by their accession numbers. Numbers at nodes indicate bootstrap values (BVs). Only BVs>70% are shown.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
03A987A17B59AF7866C4456EFAAFD889.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792073/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792073	FIGURE 7. Abyssalia aff. foliformis, laboratory photographs; Specimen RC0615 (BC011). A, Fragment. B, Detail of edge. C–D, Broken edge showing granellare embedded in dak stercomare masses.	FIGURE 7. Abyssalia aff. foliformis, laboratory photographs; Specimen RC0615 (BC011). A, Fragment. B, Detail of edge. C–D, Broken edge showing granellare embedded in dak stercomare masses.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
03A987A17B59AF7866C4456EFAAFD889.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792071/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792071	FIGURE 6. Abyssalia aff. foliformis, shipboard photographs; RC0615 (BC011).A, B, Two different side views. C, Test viewed from above. D–F, Details of test; the yellow tube in E is probably part of a Saccorhiza ramosa test.	FIGURE 6. Abyssalia aff. foliformis, shipboard photographs; RC0615 (BC011).A, B, Two different side views. C, Test viewed from above. D–F, Details of test; the yellow tube in E is probably part of a Saccorhiza ramosa test.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
03A987A17B59AF7866C4456EFAAFD889.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792059/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792059	FIGURE 2. Aschemonella monilis Gooday & Holzmann 2017. A–D, Sequenced specimens. A, Dark specimen attached to nodule; RC1056 (BC026). B, Interior of test fragment with red granellare (after removal of most pieces for sequencing) and dark stercomare; RC0056 (BC001). C, Fragment with two segments; RC0490B (BC010).D, E, RC1900.1 (BC045). D, Fragment with broken segment containing granellare. E, Detail of dome and tubular apertural structure. F, G, Specimens without cytoplasm; RC1900.2 (BC045). F, Complete fragment. G, Detail of apertural structures. No scale is available for B.	FIGURE 2. Aschemonella monilis Gooday & Holzmann 2017. A–D, Sequenced specimens. A, Dark specimen attached to nodule; RC1056 (BC026). B, Interior of test fragment with red granellare (after removal of most pieces for sequencing) and dark stercomare; RC0056 (BC001). C, Fragment with two segments; RC0490B (BC010).D, E, RC1900.1 (BC045). D, Fragment with broken segment containing granellare. E, Detail of dome and tubular apertural structure. F, G, Specimens without cytoplasm; RC1900.2 (BC045). F, Complete fragment. G, Detail of apertural structures. No scale is available for B.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
03A987A17B5EAF4366C446B9FCCFDCE1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792091/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792091	FIGURE 14. Stanophyllum aff. granulatum; sequenced specimen RC0489 (BC010). A, B Shipboard photographs A, Specimen attached to a nodule. B. Side view. C–F, Laboratory photographs. C, Entire specimen. D, E, Edge of test showing granellare branches and fringe of radiolarians attached to organic fibres (linellae). F, Granellare removed from test.	FIGURE 14. Stanophyllum aff. granulatum; sequenced specimen RC0489 (BC010). A, B Shipboard photographs A, Specimen attached to a nodule. B. Side view. C–F, Laboratory photographs. C, Entire specimen. D, E, Edge of test showing granellare branches and fringe of radiolarians attached to organic fibres (linellae). F, Granellare removed from test.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
03A987A17B5EAF4366C446B9FCCFDCE1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792095/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792095	FIGURE 15. Stanophyllum aff.granulatum; specimen that was not sequenced, RC0608 (BC015).A, B,D Shipboard photographs C, E, F, Laboratory photographs.A, B, Specimen attached to a nodule. C. Specimen detached. D, Base of test showing attachment to nodule. E, Detail of surface. F, Edge of test showing organic fibres (linellae). Scales were not available for A and B.	FIGURE 15. Stanophyllum aff.granulatum; specimen that was not sequenced, RC0608 (BC015).A, B,D Shipboard photographs C, E, F, Laboratory photographs.A, B, Specimen attached to a nodule. C. Specimen detached. D, Base of test showing attachment to nodule. E, Detail of surface. F, Edge of test showing organic fibres (linellae). Scales were not available for A and B.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
03A987A17B5EAF4366C446B9FCCFDCE1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792057/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792057	FIGURE 1. PhyML phylogenetic tree based on the 3'end fragment of the SSU rRNA gene, showing the evolutionary relationships of 79 foraminiferal sequences belonging to monothalamids. Specimens marked in bold indicate those for which sequences were acquired during the present study. The tree is unrooted. Specimens are identified by their accession numbers. Numbers at nodes indicate bootstrap values (BVs). Only BVs>70% are shown.	FIGURE 1. PhyML phylogenetic tree based on the 3'end fragment of the SSU rRNA gene, showing the evolutionary relationships of 79 foraminiferal sequences belonging to monothalamids. Specimens marked in bold indicate those for which sequences were acquired during the present study. The tree is unrooted. Specimens are identified by their accession numbers. Numbers at nodes indicate bootstrap values (BVs). Only BVs>70% are shown.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
03A987A17B61AF4166C44590FEDFDEEA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/10792081/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10792081	FIGURE 9. Claraclippia seminuda Gooday & Holzmann gen. & sp. nov.; holotype, RC0202 (BC005). A, B, Laboratory photographs taken in Geneva; details of test surface showing stercomate branches, reddish granellare strands, and the surface veneer of fine particles, which was then still partially intact. C–F, Laboratory photographs of fragments consisting mainly of stercomare branches; the photographs were taken in Southampton, by which time the surface veneer of fine particles had largely disappeared.	FIGURE 9. Claraclippia seminuda Gooday & Holzmann gen. & sp. nov.; holotype, RC0202 (BC005). A, B, Laboratory photographs taken in Geneva; details of test surface showing stercomate branches, reddish granellare strands, and the surface veneer of fine particles, which was then still partially intact. C–F, Laboratory photographs of fragments consisting mainly of stercomare branches; the photographs were taken in Southampton, by which time the surface veneer of fine particles had largely disappeared.	2024-03-06	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan		Zenodo	biologists	Holzmann, Maria;Barrenechea-Angeles, Inés;Lim, Swee-Cheng;Pawlowski, Jan			
