taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
0F16272FFFD4FFEB2C15927CFBDEF9FE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5338422/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5338422	Figure 2. In-situ aggregations of the two new species of Gigantopelta gen. nov.: A, Gigantopelta chessoia sp. nov. at E2 segment, East Scotia Ridge; B, Gigantopelta aegis sp. nov. at Longqi vent field, South West Indian Ridge. Scale bars = 5 cm.	Figure 2. In-situ aggregations of the two new species of Gigantopelta gen. nov.: A, Gigantopelta chessoia sp. nov. at E2 segment, East Scotia Ridge; B, Gigantopelta aegis sp. nov. at Longqi vent field, South West Indian Ridge. Scale bars = 5 cm.	2015-09-23	Chen, Chong;Linse, Katrin;Roterman, Christopher N.;Copley, Jonathan T.;Rogers, Alex D.		Zenodo	biologists	Chen, Chong;Linse, Katrin;Roterman, Christopher N.;Copley, Jonathan T.;Rogers, Alex D.			
0F16272FFFD4FFEB2C15927CFBDEF9FE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5338424/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5338424	Figure 3. A−C, Gigantopelta chessoia sp. nov., holotype (NHMUK 20150066): A, aperture view; B, umbilical view; C. aperture view; D−F, Gigantopelta aegis sp. nov., holotype (NHMUK 20150070): D, aperture view; E, umbilical view; F, aperture view. Scale bars = 1 cm. Photography by Pete Bucktrout (British Antarctic Survey).	Figure 3. A−C, Gigantopelta chessoia sp. nov., holotype (NHMUK 20150066): A, aperture view; B, umbilical view; C. aperture view; D−F, Gigantopelta aegis sp. nov., holotype (NHMUK 20150070): D, aperture view; E, umbilical view; F, aperture view. Scale bars = 1 cm. Photography by Pete Bucktrout (British Antarctic Survey).	2015-09-23	Chen, Chong;Linse, Katrin;Roterman, Christopher N.;Copley, Jonathan T.;Rogers, Alex D.		Zenodo	biologists	Chen, Chong;Linse, Katrin;Roterman, Christopher N.;Copley, Jonathan T.;Rogers, Alex D.			
0F16272FFFD4FFEB2C15927CFBDEF9FE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5338428/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5338428	Figure 4. A, B, Gigantopelta chessoia sp. nov., paratype shell (NHMUK 20150067): A, aperture view; B, abaperture view. C, D, Gigantopelta aegis sp. nov., paratype shell (NHMUK 20150071): C, aperture view; D, abaperture view. Scale bars = 1 cm. Photography by Pete Bucktrout (British Antarctic Survey).	Figure 4. A, B, Gigantopelta chessoia sp. nov., paratype shell (NHMUK 20150067): A, aperture view; B, abaperture view. C, D, Gigantopelta aegis sp. nov., paratype shell (NHMUK 20150071): C, aperture view; D, abaperture view. Scale bars = 1 cm. Photography by Pete Bucktrout (British Antarctic Survey).	2015-09-23	Chen, Chong;Linse, Katrin;Roterman, Christopher N.;Copley, Jonathan T.;Rogers, Alex D.		Zenodo	biologists	Chen, Chong;Linse, Katrin;Roterman, Christopher N.;Copley, Jonathan T.;Rogers, Alex D.			
0F16272FFFD4FFEB2C15927CFBDEF9FE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5338430/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5338430	Figure 5. Protoconchs: A, Gigantopelta chessoia sp. nov., scale bar = 100 μm; B, Gigantopelta aegis sp. nov., scale bar = 100 μm. Juvenile operculum: C, G. chessoia sp. nov., scale bar = 500 μm; D, G. aegis sp. nov., scale bar = 500 μm.	Figure 5. Protoconchs: A, Gigantopelta chessoia sp. nov., scale bar = 100 μm; B, Gigantopelta aegis sp. nov., scale bar = 100 μm. Juvenile operculum: C, G. chessoia sp. nov., scale bar = 500 μm; D, G. aegis sp. nov., scale bar = 500 μm.	2015-09-23	Chen, Chong;Linse, Katrin;Roterman, Christopher N.;Copley, Jonathan T.;Rogers, Alex D.		Zenodo	biologists	Chen, Chong;Linse, Katrin;Roterman, Christopher N.;Copley, Jonathan T.;Rogers, Alex D.			
0F16272FFFD4FFEB2C15927CFBDEF9FE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5338432/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5338432	Figure 6. Radula. Overview: A, Gigantopelta chessoia sp. nov.; B. Gigantopelta aegis sp. nov.; scale bars = 100 μm. Central and lateral teeth close-up: C, G. chessoia sp. nov.; D, G. aegis sp. nov.; scale bars = 20 μm. Marginal teeth close-up: E, G. chessoia sp. nov.; F. G. aegis sp. nov.; scale bars = 10 μm.	Figure 6. Radula. Overview: A, Gigantopelta chessoia sp. nov.; B. Gigantopelta aegis sp. nov.; scale bars = 100 μm. Central and lateral teeth close-up: C, G. chessoia sp. nov.; D, G. aegis sp. nov.; scale bars = 20 μm. Marginal teeth close-up: E, G. chessoia sp. nov.; F. G. aegis sp. nov.; scale bars = 10 μm.	2015-09-23	Chen, Chong;Linse, Katrin;Roterman, Christopher N.;Copley, Jonathan T.;Rogers, Alex D.		Zenodo	biologists	Chen, Chong;Linse, Katrin;Roterman, Christopher N.;Copley, Jonathan T.;Rogers, Alex D.			
0F16272FFFD4FFEB2C15927CFBDEF9FE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5338436/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5338436	Figure 7. Illustration of soft parts with the mantle partially removed: A, Gigantopelta chessoia sp. nov.; B, Gigantopelta aegis sp. nov. Scale bars = 1 cm. Abbreviations: ct, ctnidium; dg, digestive gland; eg, oesophageal gland; et, epipodial tentacles; f, foot; gd, gonad; ll, lateral lappet; o, operculum attachment; pc, pericardium; sn, snout; t, cephalic tentacles.	Figure 7. Illustration of soft parts with the mantle partially removed: A, Gigantopelta chessoia sp. nov.; B, Gigantopelta aegis sp. nov. Scale bars = 1 cm. Abbreviations: ct, ctnidium; dg, digestive gland; eg, oesophageal gland; et, epipodial tentacles; f, foot; gd, gonad; ll, lateral lappet; o, operculum attachment; pc, pericardium; sn, snout; t, cephalic tentacles.	2015-09-23	Chen, Chong;Linse, Katrin;Roterman, Christopher N.;Copley, Jonathan T.;Rogers, Alex D.		Zenodo	biologists	Chen, Chong;Linse, Katrin;Roterman, Christopher N.;Copley, Jonathan T.;Rogers, Alex D.			
0F16272FFFD4FFEB2C15927CFBDEF9FE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5338438/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5338438	Figure 8. Scatter plot of shell diameter vs. shell height across a size range of 100 specimens: A, Gigantopelta chessoia sp. nov. (line of best fit formula: y = 0.9045x −0.6278, R2 = 0.99); B, Gigantopelta aegis sp. nov. (line of best fit formula: y = 0.8823x −0.8362, R2 = 0.99).	Figure 8. Scatter plot of shell diameter vs. shell height across a size range of 100 specimens: A, Gigantopelta chessoia sp. nov. (line of best fit formula: y = 0.9045x −0.6278, R2 = 0.99); B, Gigantopelta aegis sp. nov. (line of best fit formula: y = 0.8823x −0.8362, R2 = 0.99).	2015-09-23	Chen, Chong;Linse, Katrin;Roterman, Christopher N.;Copley, Jonathan T.;Rogers, Alex D.		Zenodo	biologists	Chen, Chong;Linse, Katrin;Roterman, Christopher N.;Copley, Jonathan T.;Rogers, Alex D.			
0F16272FFFD8FFE92C2C9164FB28FD78.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5338422/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5338422	Figure 2. In-situ aggregations of the two new species of Gigantopelta gen. nov.: A, Gigantopelta chessoia sp. nov. at E2 segment, East Scotia Ridge; B, Gigantopelta aegis sp. nov. at Longqi vent field, South West Indian Ridge. Scale bars = 5 cm.	Figure 2. In-situ aggregations of the two new species of Gigantopelta gen. nov.: A, Gigantopelta chessoia sp. nov. at E2 segment, East Scotia Ridge; B, Gigantopelta aegis sp. nov. at Longqi vent field, South West Indian Ridge. Scale bars = 5 cm.	2015-09-23	Chen, Chong;Linse, Katrin;Roterman, Christopher N.;Copley, Jonathan T.;Rogers, Alex D.		Zenodo	biologists	Chen, Chong;Linse, Katrin;Roterman, Christopher N.;Copley, Jonathan T.;Rogers, Alex D.			
0F16272FFFD8FFE92C2C9164FB28FD78.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5338424/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5338424	Figure 3. A−C, Gigantopelta chessoia sp. nov., holotype (NHMUK 20150066): A, aperture view; B, umbilical view; C. aperture view; D−F, Gigantopelta aegis sp. nov., holotype (NHMUK 20150070): D, aperture view; E, umbilical view; F, aperture view. Scale bars = 1 cm. Photography by Pete Bucktrout (British Antarctic Survey).	Figure 3. A−C, Gigantopelta chessoia sp. nov., holotype (NHMUK 20150066): A, aperture view; B, umbilical view; C. aperture view; D−F, Gigantopelta aegis sp. nov., holotype (NHMUK 20150070): D, aperture view; E, umbilical view; F, aperture view. Scale bars = 1 cm. Photography by Pete Bucktrout (British Antarctic Survey).	2015-09-23	Chen, Chong;Linse, Katrin;Roterman, Christopher N.;Copley, Jonathan T.;Rogers, Alex D.		Zenodo	biologists	Chen, Chong;Linse, Katrin;Roterman, Christopher N.;Copley, Jonathan T.;Rogers, Alex D.			
0F16272FFFD8FFE92C2C9164FB28FD78.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5338428/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5338428	Figure 4. A, B, Gigantopelta chessoia sp. nov., paratype shell (NHMUK 20150067): A, aperture view; B, abaperture view. C, D, Gigantopelta aegis sp. nov., paratype shell (NHMUK 20150071): C, aperture view; D, abaperture view. Scale bars = 1 cm. Photography by Pete Bucktrout (British Antarctic Survey).	Figure 4. A, B, Gigantopelta chessoia sp. nov., paratype shell (NHMUK 20150067): A, aperture view; B, abaperture view. C, D, Gigantopelta aegis sp. nov., paratype shell (NHMUK 20150071): C, aperture view; D, abaperture view. Scale bars = 1 cm. Photography by Pete Bucktrout (British Antarctic Survey).	2015-09-23	Chen, Chong;Linse, Katrin;Roterman, Christopher N.;Copley, Jonathan T.;Rogers, Alex D.		Zenodo	biologists	Chen, Chong;Linse, Katrin;Roterman, Christopher N.;Copley, Jonathan T.;Rogers, Alex D.			
0F16272FFFD8FFE92C2C9164FB28FD78.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5338430/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5338430	Figure 5. Protoconchs: A, Gigantopelta chessoia sp. nov., scale bar = 100 μm; B, Gigantopelta aegis sp. nov., scale bar = 100 μm. Juvenile operculum: C, G. chessoia sp. nov., scale bar = 500 μm; D, G. aegis sp. nov., scale bar = 500 μm.	Figure 5. Protoconchs: A, Gigantopelta chessoia sp. nov., scale bar = 100 μm; B, Gigantopelta aegis sp. nov., scale bar = 100 μm. Juvenile operculum: C, G. chessoia sp. nov., scale bar = 500 μm; D, G. aegis sp. nov., scale bar = 500 μm.	2015-09-23	Chen, Chong;Linse, Katrin;Roterman, Christopher N.;Copley, Jonathan T.;Rogers, Alex D.		Zenodo	biologists	Chen, Chong;Linse, Katrin;Roterman, Christopher N.;Copley, Jonathan T.;Rogers, Alex D.			
0F16272FFFD8FFE92C2C9164FB28FD78.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5338432/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5338432	Figure 6. Radula. Overview: A, Gigantopelta chessoia sp. nov.; B. Gigantopelta aegis sp. nov.; scale bars = 100 μm. Central and lateral teeth close-up: C, G. chessoia sp. nov.; D, G. aegis sp. nov.; scale bars = 20 μm. Marginal teeth close-up: E, G. chessoia sp. nov.; F. G. aegis sp. nov.; scale bars = 10 μm.	Figure 6. Radula. Overview: A, Gigantopelta chessoia sp. nov.; B. Gigantopelta aegis sp. nov.; scale bars = 100 μm. Central and lateral teeth close-up: C, G. chessoia sp. nov.; D, G. aegis sp. nov.; scale bars = 20 μm. Marginal teeth close-up: E, G. chessoia sp. nov.; F. G. aegis sp. nov.; scale bars = 10 μm.	2015-09-23	Chen, Chong;Linse, Katrin;Roterman, Christopher N.;Copley, Jonathan T.;Rogers, Alex D.		Zenodo	biologists	Chen, Chong;Linse, Katrin;Roterman, Christopher N.;Copley, Jonathan T.;Rogers, Alex D.			
0F16272FFFD8FFE92C2C9164FB28FD78.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5338436/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5338436	Figure 7. Illustration of soft parts with the mantle partially removed: A, Gigantopelta chessoia sp. nov.; B, Gigantopelta aegis sp. nov. Scale bars = 1 cm. Abbreviations: ct, ctnidium; dg, digestive gland; eg, oesophageal gland; et, epipodial tentacles; f, foot; gd, gonad; ll, lateral lappet; o, operculum attachment; pc, pericardium; sn, snout; t, cephalic tentacles.	Figure 7. Illustration of soft parts with the mantle partially removed: A, Gigantopelta chessoia sp. nov.; B, Gigantopelta aegis sp. nov. Scale bars = 1 cm. Abbreviations: ct, ctnidium; dg, digestive gland; eg, oesophageal gland; et, epipodial tentacles; f, foot; gd, gonad; ll, lateral lappet; o, operculum attachment; pc, pericardium; sn, snout; t, cephalic tentacles.	2015-09-23	Chen, Chong;Linse, Katrin;Roterman, Christopher N.;Copley, Jonathan T.;Rogers, Alex D.		Zenodo	biologists	Chen, Chong;Linse, Katrin;Roterman, Christopher N.;Copley, Jonathan T.;Rogers, Alex D.			
0F16272FFFD8FFE92C2C9164FB28FD78.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5338438/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5338438	Figure 8. Scatter plot of shell diameter vs. shell height across a size range of 100 specimens: A, Gigantopelta chessoia sp. nov. (line of best fit formula: y = 0.9045x −0.6278, R2 = 0.99); B, Gigantopelta aegis sp. nov. (line of best fit formula: y = 0.8823x −0.8362, R2 = 0.99).	Figure 8. Scatter plot of shell diameter vs. shell height across a size range of 100 specimens: A, Gigantopelta chessoia sp. nov. (line of best fit formula: y = 0.9045x −0.6278, R2 = 0.99); B, Gigantopelta aegis sp. nov. (line of best fit formula: y = 0.8823x −0.8362, R2 = 0.99).	2015-09-23	Chen, Chong;Linse, Katrin;Roterman, Christopher N.;Copley, Jonathan T.;Rogers, Alex D.		Zenodo	biologists	Chen, Chong;Linse, Katrin;Roterman, Christopher N.;Copley, Jonathan T.;Rogers, Alex D.			
