identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
0C29C07BF230FFD3FF4378AA4334FE58.text	0C29C07BF230FFD3FF4378AA4334FE58.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Abacarus sundarbanensis Sur & Roy & Chakrabarti 2018	<div><p>Abacarus sundarbanensis n. sp.</p><p>(Figs. 1, 2)</p><p>Diagnosis. Prodorsal shield with complete admedian lines, submedian lines absent, covered with numerous small granules, median line present in posterior 1/3 of prodorsal shield and forms Y-shaped fork meeting admedian lines anteriorly; ridges of dorsal opisthosoma without microtubercles; genital coverflap with 5 transverse lines anteriorly and 4-5 converging, oblique lines posteriorly; empodium 4-rayed.</p><p>FEMALE (holotype and 19 paratypes): Body fusiform, white coloured, 168 (168–172), 55 (52–56) wide. Gnathosoma—17 (14–17), projecting downward; pedipalp genual setae d 4 (3–4), pedipalp coxal setae ep 2 (2–3). Prodorsal shield—30 (30–31), 51 (48–51) wide, sub-triangular, blunt frontal lobe over gnathosoma, covered with numerous small granules, median line present in posterior 1/3 part of prodorsal shield and forms Y-shaped fork meeting admedian lines anteriorly, admedian lines complete, sinuate with transverse line at anterior 1/3 part of prodorsal shield, submedian lines absent; sub-cylindrical scapular tubercles 5 (4–5) at rear shield margin, 23 (21– 23) apart, scapular setae sc 19 (18–20) and directed posteriorly. Leg I—from base of trochanter 26 (26–28), femur 7 (7–9), basiventral femoral seta bv 12 (11–12); genu 3 (3–4), antaxial genual setae l″ 26 (25–26); tibia 5 (4–5), paraxial tibial setae l ′ 12 (11–12); tarsus 7 (6–7), paraxial fastigial tarsal setae ft ′ 18 (18–19), antaxial fastigial tarsal setae ft″ 15 (15–17), paraxial unguinal tarsal setae u ′ 4 (4–5); tarsal empodium em 5 (4–5), 4-rayed, tarsal solenidion ω 5 (4–5), curved and blunt. Leg II—from base of trochanter 23 (23–25), femur 8 (7–8), basiventral femoral seta bv 14 (14–16); genu 2 (2–3), antaxial genual setae l″ 9 (8–9); tibia 4 (3–4), paraxial tibial setae l ′ absent; tarsus 5 (5–7), paraxial fastigial tarsal setae ft ′ 19 (18–20), antaxial fastigial tarsal setae ft″ 10 (9–10), paraxial unguinal tarsal setae u ′ 3 (3–4); tarsal empodium em 5 (4–5), 4-rayed, tarsal solenidion ω 6 (6–8), curved and blunt. Prosternal apodeme indistinct. Coxae I—13 (13–15) with small granules; anterolateral setae on coxisternum I 1 b 4 (4–5) and 9 (8–9) apart; proximal setae on coxisternum I 1a 9 (9–10) and 9 (8–9) apart; coxae II—11 (11–12) with fewer granules than coxae I, base of coxal setae with few small curved lines, proximal setae on coxisternum II 2 a 34 (34–36) and 23 (22–23) apart, setae 1a located well anterior to 2a. Opisthosoma—with 65 (64–67) dorsal annuli forming three ridges, median ridge extends from 3rd (2nd–3rd) annulus to 40th (38th–42nd) annulus and ends in a dorsal furrow, lateral ridges extend from 2nd (1st–2nd) annulus to 51st (48th–52nd) annulus; 64 (64–68) ventral annuli with rounded microtubercles till 53rd annuli and microstriation present on last 14 annuli; setae c2 30 (30–35) on ventral annulus 8 (8–9); setae d 55 (54–55) on ventral annulus 19 (18–19); setae e 60 (58– 60) on ventral annulus 40 (38–40); setae f 20 (20–25) on ventral annulus 61 (61–63); setae h1 4 (3–4), setae h2 32 (32–36). Genital coverflap—13 (13–15), 19 (19–21) wide, with five transverse lines at basal part and distal striae forming one small longitudinal line at centre and 5 (4–5) diagonal lines on either side, converging posteriorly, proximal setae on coxisternum III 3a 16 (13–17). Internal genitalia—apodeme curved, spermathecal duct short, spermathecae long and rounded.</p><p>MALE: Not observed.</p><p>Type material. Holotype: Female (marked) on slide (no. 1888/191/2017), INDIA: West Bengal, Jharkhali, Sundarban, South 24 Paraganas, 22˚03′ N, 88˚70′ E, altitude 40 m, 30 March, 2017 on Pongamia glabra (Fabaceae), coll. S. Roy. Paratypes: 9 females on 4 slides; (nos. 1889-1892 /191/2017) collection data same as holotype; 10 females and 9 nymphs on 8 slides (nos. 1905-1912 /240/2017), 25 December, 2017, collected from the above plant from the same locality, coll. S. Roy &amp; S. Sur.</p><p>Relation to host. The white coloured mites are vagrant on the under-surfaces of leaves.</p><p>Etymology. The specific epithet is masculine gender and is derived from the locality of the specimens collected.</p><p>Remarks. Abacarus sundarbanensis n. sp. comes very close to Abacarus gossypii Mohanasundaram, 1982 in having a genital flap with horizontal lines on the basal part and distal striae with one longitudinal line in the centre, granular coxae, all normal leg setae and simple tarsal solenidion ω. However, A. sundarbanensis is distinct from the latter by the presence of complete admedian lines and absence of submedian lines on the prodorsal shield, 4- rayed empodium, absence of microtubercles on the ridges of the dorsal opisthosoma, and distal scorings with 5 (4- 5) lines on genital coverflap (whereas short admedian lines and three submedian lines on each side of prodorsal shield, 5-rayed empodium, microtubercles on ridges of dorsal opisthosoma, and distal scorings with 10 lines on genital coverflap in A. gossypii).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0C29C07BF230FFD3FF4378AA4334FE58	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sur, Surajit;Roy, Sourav;Chakrabarti, Samiran	Sur, Surajit, Roy, Sourav, Chakrabarti, Samiran (2018): Two new eriophyoid mites (Acari: Eriophyoidea) from West Bengal, India. Zootaxa 4434 (1): 193-200, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4434.1.13
0C29C07BF232FFD4FF437D5C4065F884.text	0C29C07BF232FFD4FF437D5C4065F884.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Diptilomiopus augustifoliae Sur & Roy & Chakrabarti 2018	<div><p>Diptilomiopus augustifoliae n. sp.</p><p>(Figs. 3, 4)</p><p>Diagnosis. Prodorsal shield with 10 cells in anterior row, six cells in medial row, four cells in posterior row plus posteromedial cell, pedipalp tarsal ventral setae v absent, genital coverflap with broken striations on basal part only, setae h1 absent.</p><p>FEMALE (holotype and 12 paratypes): Body spindleform, yellow coloured, 195 (175–195), 88 (80–91) wide. Gnathosoma—39 (37–40), abruptly curved downward; pedipalp genual setae d 6 (6–7), pedipalp coxal setae ep 2 (2–3), cheliceral stylets 53 (53–54). Prodorsal shield—29 (29–30), 49 (48–50) wide, frontal lobe absent; median line and admedian lines not complete; shield designs with anterior row of horizontal cells, comprising 10 cells along anterolateral shield margin, second row with six cells, third row with four cells plus posteromedial cell, prodorsal shield with some transverse dashes anteriorly; scapular tubercles 2 (2–3) present but scapular setae sc absent. Sternal line present. Coxae I—14 (14–15), with numerous small dashes; anterolateral setae 1b absent; proximal setae on coxisternum I 1 a 32 (32–34) and 5 (4–5) apart; coxae II—14 (14–15), with very few dashes but not distinct as on coxae I, proximal setae on coxisternum II 2 a 42 (39–42) and 12 (12–14) apart, setae 1a located little ahead of 2a, not in same line. Leg I—38 (38–41), femur 16 (16–17), basiventral femoral seta bv absent; tibia 6 (6–7), paraxial tibial setae l ′ absent; tarsus 10 (10–11), paraxial fastigial tarsal setae ft ′ 33 (31–33), antaxial fastigial tarsal setae ft″ 32 (30–32), paraxial unguinal tarsal setae u ′ 3 (2–3); tarsal empodium em 8 (8–9), divided, each branch 6–rayed, tarsal solenidion ω 4 (4–5), knobbed. Leg II—30 (30–32), femur 10 (10–11), basiventral femoral seta bv absent; tibia 4 (4–5), paraxial tibial setae l ′ absent; tarsus 10 (10–11), paraxial fastigial tarsal setae ft ′ 29 (29–30), antaxial fastigial tarsal setae ft″ absent, paraxial unguinal tarsal setae u ′ 3 (2–3); tarsal empodium em 8 (8–9), divided, each branch 6–rayed, tarsal solenidion ω 6 (6–7), knobbed. Opisthosoma—with faint median dorsal ridge, dorsal annuli 64 (64–66); ventral annuli 86 (85–86), with rounded microtubercles, last 8 annuli with microstriations; setae c2 absent; setae d 12 (12–13) on ventral annulus 29; setae e 5 (5–6) on ventral annulus 53; setae f 26 (26–27) on ventral annulus 78; setae h1 absent, setae h2 40 (40–41). Genital coverflap—15 (15–16), 26 (26–28) wide with broken longitudinal striations on basal part, proximal setae on coxisternum III 3a 6 (6–7), 18 (18–19) apart. Internal genitalia—apodeme curved, short spermathecal duct leads to abbreviated and rounded spermathecae.</p><p>MALE (n=1): Smaller than female, body 158, 65 wide. Coxae I—11, with several small dashes; proximal setae on coxisternum I 1a 23 and 4 apart; coxae II—11, with very few dashes but not distinct as on coxae I, proximal setae on coxisternum II 2 a 32 and 10 apart. Leg I—33, femur 13, tibia 5; tarsus 9, paraxial fastigial tarsal setae ft ′ 28, antaxial fastigial tarsal setae ft″ 27, paraxial unguinal tarsal setae u ′ 3; tarsal empodium em 7, divided, each branch 6–rayed, tarsal solenidion ω 4, knobbed. Leg II—28, femur 9; tibia 4, tarsus 9, paraxial fastigial tarsal setae ft ′ 27, paraxial unguinal tarsal setae u ′ 3; tarsal empodium em 7, divided, each branch 6–rayed, tarsal solenidion ω 6, knobbed. Male genitalia—19 wide, proximal setae on coxisternum III 3a 6, 13 apart.</p><p>Type material. Holotype: Female (marked) on slide (no. 1812/101/2016), INDIA: West Bengal, Jalpaiguri, Golabari, 26˚31′N, 88˚17′E, altitude 228 m, 20 August, 2016 on Ambroma augusta (L.) ( Sterculiaceae), coll. S. Sur. Paratypes: 4 females, 4 nymphs and 1 male on slide bearing holotype and 14 females and 6 nymphs on 8 slides (nos. 1813-1820 /101/2016), collection data same as holotype; 6 females and 3 nymphs on 2 slides (nos. 1886-1887 / 35/2015), Hooghly, Konnagar, 22˚70′N, 88˚34′ E, altitude 10 m, 17 July, 2015 on same host plant, coll. S. Roy.</p><p>Relation to host. The yellow coloured mites are vagrant on the under-surfaces of leaves.</p><p>Etymology. The specific epithet is masculine gender and is derived from the species name of the host plant plus foliae from Latin ‘folium’—noun meaning leaf (masculine ‘ ae ’) designating site of infestation.</p><p>Remarks. Diptilomiopus augustifoliae n. sp. comes very close to Diptilomiopus ambromae Wang, Wei &amp; Yang, 2009 in having the prodorsal shield with a reticulated network of cells and median ridges on dorsal annuli, but remains distinct by presence of scapular tubercles, absence of pedipalp tarsal ventral setae v, absence of accessory setae h1, prodorsal shield with six cells in medial row and with posteromedial cell and genital coverflap with basal striations (versus scapular tubercles absent; pedipalpal seta v and accessory setae h1 present; eight cells in medial row and posteromedial cell divided into two; coverflap with irregular broken patterning).</p><p>This new species belongs to the group of Diptilomiopus having scapular tubercles in combination with a reticulated cellular network on prodorsal shield, at least 57 species belong to this group. Among these species, D. augustifoliae n. sp. comes very close to Diptilomiopus camerae Mohanasundaram, 1981 and D. debregeasiae Li, Wei &amp; Wang, 2009 by the presence of a 6-rayed empodium and absence of h1 setae but remains distinctly different in having pedipalp coxal setae ep, basal striations on genital coverflap and number and arrangement of cells on the prodorsal shield.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0C29C07BF232FFD4FF437D5C4065F884	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sur, Surajit;Roy, Sourav;Chakrabarti, Samiran	Sur, Surajit, Roy, Sourav, Chakrabarti, Samiran (2018): Two new eriophyoid mites (Acari: Eriophyoidea) from West Bengal, India. Zootaxa 4434 (1): 193-200, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4434.1.13
