identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
126487C9D560B213EEE1FBA0AE205D16.text	126487C9D560B213EEE1FBA0AE205D16.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Lonicera implexa Aiton 1789	<div><p>Lonicera implexa Aiton (1789: 231)</p> <p>Type (neotype, designated here):—[EX HORT], Hort. Pitcairne [William Pitcairn], Planta forte e Minorca (BM barcode BM 001134432 [digital image!]) (image of the neotype available at: http://data.nhm.ac.uk/object/d61adcf5-0955-46e0-b8ea-f7224c43876f).</p> <p>Notes: —Aiton’s protologue consisted of a short diagnosis (“ L. floribus ringentibus verticillatus, bracteis laevibus, foliis perennantibus glabris oblongis: superioribus connate-perfoliatis: summis dilatatis”) followed by six annotations: 1) “ Minorca Honey-suckle”, 2) “ Nat. of Minorca ”, 3) “ Introd. about 1772, by Mons. Richard.”, 4) “ Fl. June–September.”, 5) “Obs. Folia minora et angustiora quam in plerisque speciebus hujus generis.”, and 6) “ H. Ђ.”, indicating that this species is hardy [H.] and shrubby [Ђ.].</p> <p>William Aiton set to work in the 1780s to catalogue every plant being grown at Kew. The result, published in 1789, was called Hortus kewensis and included information on the country of origin of every plant, and who first cultivated it in Britain, and when. Aiton instituted a sort of kindly rivalry between William Pitcairn (1712–1791), and Mr. James Lee of Hammersmith (1715–1795). Every acquisition of new seeds or plants was equally shared by these three cultivators, who, pursuing various methods of culture, of course had differing success. However, these authors divided and distributed his stock of plants with his fellows (Hepper 1982, Desmond 2007).</p> <p>Rosselló &amp; Sáez (2008: 61) indicated that the type material was “not traced, and to be searched at K ”. However, we have been unable to locate any original material at K. As indicated by Stafleu &amp; Cowan (1976: 25) almost all types of both editions of the Hortus kewensis are in the Banksian herbarium at BM. However, the botanical descriptions in the Hortus kewensis were not made by the Aitons (William Aiton [1731–1793] and William Townsend Aiton [1766– 1849]), but by Daniel Carl Solander, Jonas Carlsson Dryander and Robert Brown, based on material from Kew. On the other hand, some of the new taxa described in the first edition of the Hortus kewensis, published in 1789, originated from L’Héritier (so indicated) and the types of those taxa are in the L’Héritier herbarium at G-DC.</p> <p>The Solander’s botanical manuscript was used by J. Dryander for Aiton’s Hortus kewensis eds. 1 and 2, and is preserved at BM (see Rauschenberg 1968, Bridson et al. 1980, Stafleu &amp; Cowan 1985: 721). In the page 627 of the Solander’s manuscript is described Lonicera implexa; the species was collected by Richard in Minorca, about 1772, and cultivated in the Royal Botanic Gardens of Kew. However, we have not found any herbarium sheet with original material from Aiton, Solander, Dryander or Brown of this species in the herbaria consulted (e.g., BM, K, G, and P).</p> <p>In the herbarium BM there is a relevant specimen, with barcode BM 001134432. The sheet bears a well preserved fragment, with leaves and flowers, and a label “Hort. Pitcairne [William Pitcairn] / Planta forte e Minorca ”. The sheet is also annotated “The type, both in Solander MSS v. 627 Ait. is a plant introduced from Minorca by Richard. This specimen is not Type but if the name were originally in Solander’s hand it is idiotype”, handwritten by an unknown author in 1923.</p> <p>Although, clearly important, this specimen at BM lacks any annotation of Aiton, Solander or Dryander, and so, it cannot be considered certainly as original material (according to Art. 9.3 (a) of the ICN, McNeill et al. 2012). Unfortunately it is not possible to establish any link between this material and the Aitons. However, in our opinion the specimen BM 001134432 can be a good candidate as the neotype of the name, despite the specimen was cultivated in the Royal Botanic Gardens of Kew, the geographical locality from the original material agrees with the locality given in the protologue, and the specimen could have been used by Aiton since it was cultivated by a contemporary and colleague author (William Pitcairn) in the same garden where Aiton worked. This specimen represents the traditional concept and current use of the name Lonicera implexa (e.g., Browicz 1976, López González 2001, Ruiz de la Torre 2006, Ruiz Téllez &amp; Devesa 2007) and is designated as the neotype of the name.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/126487C9D560B213EEE1FBA0AE205D16	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Ferrer-Gallego, P. Pablo;Laguna, Emilio	Ferrer-Gallego, P. Pablo, Laguna, Emilio (2018): The nomenclatural types of four names in Lonicera (Caprifoliaceae). Phytotaxa 345 (3): 286-292, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.345.3.5, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.345.3.5
126487C9D563B215EEE1FDC6A8E55DAA.text	126487C9D563B215EEE1FDC6A8E55DAA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Lonicera implexa var. longifolia Gussone 1843	<div><p>Lonicera implexa var. longifolia Gussone (1843: 259)</p> <p>Type (lectotype, designated here):—[ITALY]. Saline, Gussone s.n., May (PAL number of identification 59927 [digital image!], available at: http://147.163.105.223/zoomify/view_img.asp?ic=59927).</p> <p>Notes: —The protologue includes a description of the plant, and a comment with the geographical locality: “var. c. in dumetis et ad sepes, Saline”. In the Herbarium Mediterraneum Panormitanum at PAL we found original material of Gussone. The herbarium sheet (number of identification 59927), bears two fragments with leaves and flowers, and a label annotated “Maggio / Lonicera implexa Ait. / longifolia Guss / Saline Guss” handwritten by Gussone. We have not found any other specimen in any herbaria in which the Gussone’s material is deposited (CAT, NAP and PAV). This specimen matches well the Gussone’s protologue, and corresponds to the current concept and use of the name (e.g., Ruiz Téllez &amp; Devesa 2007). Therefore, we designate it as the lectotype of the name.</p> <p>Lonicera valentina Pau ex Willkomm (1891: 52)</p> <p>≡ Lonicera implexa var. valentina (Pau ex Willkomm) Maire (1931: 294)</p> <p>Type (holotype):—[SPAIN]. Segorbe [Castellon province], Barranco del Azutejo, C. Pau s.n., June 1889 (MA barcode MA 118870 [digital image!]) (image of the holotype available at: http://161.111.171.57/herbarioV/visorVCat.php?img=MA-01-00118870).</p> <p>= Lonicera maialis Sennen (1928: 144)</p> <p>Type (lectotype, designated here):— [SPAIN]. Barcelone: Massif du Tibidabo, F. Sennen (exsiccata Plantes d’Espagne N. 3697), 29-V-1918 (BC barcode BC966296 [digital image!]) (Fig. 1); isolectotypes: MPU barcode MPU023979 (image available at: http://plants. jstor.org/stable/viewer/10.5555/al.ap.specimen.mpu023979), MPU barcode MPU023980 (image available at: http://plants.jstor.org/ stable/viewer/10.5555/al.ap.specimen.mpu023980?loggedin=true), MA barcode MA-01-00118833 [digital image!], BC barcodes BC26590 [digital image!], BC966294 [digital image!], BC966295 [digital image!].</p> <p>Notes: —The name Lonicera valentina was validly published by Willkomm (1891: 52) from the specific epithet mentioned by Pau (1889) as Caprifolium valentinum. Willkomm mentioned in the protologue: “ Lonicera valentina Pau (sub Caprifolio) Not. III, p. 30 (sine descriptione)”. Certainly, the name Caprifolium valentinum Pau (1889: 30) is a nomen nudum because it was published without a description or diagnosis or reference to a description or diagnosis previously published.</p> <p>The Willkomm’s protologue of Lonicera valentina consisted of a complete description followed by the geographical indication “In regno Valentino, ubi cl. Carolus Pau junio 1889 eam prope Segarbé [Segorbe] in vallibus montis Monte Malo usque ad montem del Azutejo primus observavit” from Pau (1889: 30 sub “289. Caprifolium valentinum Pau ” “Monte Malo, descendiendo por los barrancos hasta el del Azutejo: rara, Segorbe” [descending through the ravines to the Azutejo: rare, Segorbe]), repeated by Willkomm (1893: 134).</p> <p>We have not found any herbarium sheet from this geographical locality in the Willkomm Herbarium at COI. However in the herbarium of the Royal Botanic Garden of Madrid at MA there is a relevant herbarium sheet (MA barcode MA 118870) that contains material collected by Carlos Pau in 1889 (Carrasco 1975). This sheet bears a single fragment with leaves, but no flowers, and contains a label handwritten by Pau “ Lonicera valentina Pau, Notas. / ˈBarranco del Azutejoˈ raris / Segorbe / VI 1889 ”, this geographical locality matches with the geographical indication cited in the protologue “…montis Monte Malo usque ad montem del Azutejo…”. We have been unable to locate any further original material in any herbaria that contain Pau’s material (e.g., AK, B, BC, BR, E-GL, FI, G, GB, GOET, K, L, LIVU, LRMANCH, PH, PI, W) (see Stafleu &amp; Cowan 1983).</p> <p>In conclusion, the specimen at MA (barcode MA 118870) appears to be the only specimen that comprises the gathering cited in the protologue. In this sense, as indicated by McNeill (2014) “If, prior to 1958, a single gathering (but not a single specimen) is indicated as the basis of a new taxon but without the word type, there will be a holotype only if it can be established that the author used no other element and if the gathering is represented by a single specimen—because the specimens that comprise the gathering are syntypes (Art. 40 Note 1)”. Therefore, the specimen MA 118870 can be considered as the holotype of the name Lonicera valentina. Fortunately, it is in a good state of preservation and represents the traditional concept and current use of the name (e.g., Ruiz Téllez &amp; Devesa 2007).</p> <p>On the other hand, Sennen (1928: 144) describes the species Lonicera maialis from the exsiccata “Plantes d’Espagne N. 3697”, collected in “Massif du Tibidabo” (Barcelona, Spain). The protologue includes a description in Latin and in French, and the geographical localty “Hab.—Barcelone, massif du Tibidabo, dans la brousse.”. There are several specimens marked with the number 3697 in some European herbaria (e.g., BC, MA, MPU). All these herbarium sheets bear the same printed label “Plantes d’Espagne— F. Sennen / Nº 3697 / Lonicera maialis Sennen / Barcelona: Massif du Tibidabo / 1918 et 1919– V et VI ”. Curiously, this material belongs to more than one gathering (see Art. 8.2) since it has two different dates “ 1918- V and 1919- VI ”. However, there are two sheets at BC with an original label handritten by Sennen. The sheet at BC with barcode BC 966296 is annotated “ 1918-29- V ”, and the sheet with barcode BC 966294 is annotated “ 1919-8- VI ”. We designated as the lectotype of the name Lonicera maialis the specimen preserved at BC, with barcode BC 966296.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/126487C9D563B215EEE1FDC6A8E55DAA	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Ferrer-Gallego, P. Pablo;Laguna, Emilio	Ferrer-Gallego, P. Pablo, Laguna, Emilio (2018): The nomenclatural types of four names in Lonicera (Caprifoliaceae). Phytotaxa 345 (3): 286-292, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.345.3.5, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.345.3.5
