identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
115487BCFFDCFF90FF6BDBAAAA7AFDED.text	115487BCFFDCFF90FF6BDBAAAA7AFDED.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Epipedus Spinola 1837	<div><p>Epipedus Spinola, 1837</p><p>Epipedus Spinola, 1837: 314 –315 (description); Rolston, 1987: 69 –70 (diagnosis)</p><p>Diagnosis. Body length larger than 10.0 mm. Shape of the body oval with a ratio of length versus width of the body larger than 1.39 (Fig. 1 C &amp; 1G). Mandibular plates reflexed along lateral margins, converging over clypeus apically. Antennae 4-segmented: antennomers I surpassing apex of head, antennomers II with black spot at the tip, longer than antennomers III (not seen in E. rolstoni because they are missing). Anterolateral margins of pronotum convex. Corium with black deep contrasting punctations. Anterolateral border of exocorium flat. Apices of tibiae triangular.</p><p>Comments. Rolston (1987) mentioned the mandibular plates strongly reflexed along lateral margins, the antennomers I surpassing apex of head, the anterolateral margins of pronotum strongly reflexed and tibiae with apex flattened or broadly rounded, as diagnosis characters of Epipedus, but not the other ones above. The other characters he mentioned are not diagnostic.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/115487BCFFDCFF90FF6BDBAAAA7AFDED	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Lupoli, Roland	Lupoli, Roland (2016): Diagnosis of Calagasma Bergroth and Epipedus Spinola with description of Calagasma eclipsa sp. nov. and Epipedus rolstoni sp. nov. (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae: Pentatominae: Carpocorini). Zootaxa 4170 (2): 330-338, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4170.2.6
115487BCFFDCFF93FF6BD9ECAA83FE8E.text	115487BCFFDCFF93FF6BD9ECAA83FE8E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Epipedus histrio Spinola 1837	<div><p>Epipedus histrio Spinola, 1837</p><p>Epipedus histrio Spinola, 1837: 315 –316; Rolston, 1987: 69 –70; Grazia &amp; Campos, 2010</p><p>Material examined (n: 1). Brazil, Rio de Janeiro ( Corcovado Mountain): 1961, 1 ♀ Alvarenga &amp; Seabra leg. (UFPR) (Fig. 1 C).</p><p>Measurements. Total length: 11.6 mm; pronotum width: 7.1 mm; abdomen width: 8.2 mm; head length: 1.3 mm; head width across the eyes: 2.2 mm; pronotum length: 2.2 mm; antennomers I: 0.7 mm; II: 3.1 mm; other antennomers are missing. Measurements were performed on photos digitalized with a precision scale, by expanding, measuring and comparing them on a computer screen. Spinola mentioned a body length of 5 lines, i.e. 11.3 mm and a width of 3.5 lines, i.e. 7.9 mm, and Rolston a body length of 12.2 mm, a width of 8.5 mm. and the following lengths of antennomers: I: 0.8 mm, II: 3.6 mm, III: 2.6 mm, IV: 2.5 mm.</p><p>Diagnosis. Global dorsal color mostly rufous with eight contrasting brownish yellow spots bordered by black lines (Fig. 1 C). Clypeus and vertex brownish yellow, bordered on each side by a black line. Mandibular plates rufous and reflexed along lateral margins, converging over clypeus apically. Clypeus slightly longer than mandibular plates. Antennomers I and II rufous. Spinola (1837) stated that antennomers II are longer than antennomers III and this was confirmed by Rolston (1987). Distal tenth of antennomers II fuscous. Antennomers I surpassing apex of head. Anterolateral margins of the pronotum convex. Pronotum with extensive rufous markings and concolorous punctures partially enclosed in V-shaped black lines, forming three V-shaped brownish yellow spots. Scutellum flat, mostly rufous with concolorous punctation. Impunctate brownish yellow macule covering most of the mesial half of the scutellar base. At the base of the scutellum on each side, macule and border along most of frenal margins brownish yellow, much of this border outlined in black. Median brownish yellow impunctate carina, starting from the basal tumescence and then disappearing before the apex. Corium greyish rufous with black deep punctations uniformly distributed, except in a large brownish yellow impunctate spot bordered by a black line in the apical part of exocorium and mesocorium, and in a rufous impunctate area in central mesocorium. Distal part of the corium surrounded by a narrow black submarginal line. Costal margin of each corium strongly reflexed basally, posterior margin sigmoid, costal angle acute. Connexivum yellow, impunctate, slightly exposed, less than half as broad as exocorium. Venter greyish yellow as well as legs. All tibiae broadly, shallowly sulcate apically otherwise cylindrical (right protibia and left metatibia visible in Fig. 1 C) as mentioned by Spinola (1837). Female genital plates with distal ends of the laterotergites 8 &amp; 9 forming acute angles (Fig. 2 B).</p><p>Comments: The description by Spinola (1837) of colorful patterns and markings on the dorsal side of E. histrio are consistent with the descriptions and drawings (Fig. 1 B) by Rolston (1987) and the specimen of UFPR (Fig. 1 C). Spinola wrote that head, pronotum, scutellum and cories are scarlet red with some yellowish-white spots. He mentioned three yellowish-white triangular spots bordered with black on the pronotum. These spots are not easy to see on the black and white figure of Rolston (Fig. 1 B) although they are clearly visible and contrasted in the specimen of UFPR (Fig. 1 C). This specimen has dimensions and shape of the body similar to those observed by Spinola and Rolston. Spinola mentioned that the first antennomer is reddish in color and that the others are yellowish with a black spot at the tip. This is the case for the specimen of UFPR (Fig. 1 C) for antennomers I and II. On the other hand, the female genital plates of this specimen (Fig. 2 B) are very similar to those of the specimen in the Rolston drawing (Fig. 2A) particularly the acute shapes of laterotergites 8 &amp; 9.</p><p>Distribution. BRAZIL, Rio de Janeiro.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/115487BCFFDCFF93FF6BD9ECAA83FE8E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Lupoli, Roland	Lupoli, Roland (2016): Diagnosis of Calagasma Bergroth and Epipedus Spinola with description of Calagasma eclipsa sp. nov. and Epipedus rolstoni sp. nov. (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae: Pentatominae: Carpocorini). Zootaxa 4170 (2): 330-338, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4170.2.6
115487BCFFDFFF93FF6BDA52AA47F800.text	115487BCFFDFFF93FF6BDA52AA47F800.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Epipedus rolstoni Lupoli	<div><p>Epipedus rolstoni Lupoli sp. nov.</p><p>(Figs. 1 G &amp; 2C)</p><p>Etymology. Dedicated to Larry H. Rolston who suspected that this specimen might be a new species in the genus Epipedus .</p><p>Material examined (n: 1). Holotype ♀. Three labels are pinned on this specimen: a) Epipedus sp. det. L.H. Rolston "86", b) Calagasma margarita Berg. det. H. Ruckes, 1961, c) Northern Brazil. Below, red label: "HOLOTYPE— Epipedus rolstoni — Roland Lupoli, 2016". Deposited at the American Museum of Natural History of New York , USA (AMNH) (currently on loan to UFRGS). ♂ unknown .</p><p>Measurements. Total length: 10.0 mm; pronotum width: 6.2 mm; abdomen width: 7.2 mm; head length: 1.3 mm; head width across the eyes: 2.1 mm; pronotum length: 1.8 mm; antennomers I: 0.75 mm; II: 3.1 mm; other antennomers are missing.</p><p>Diagnosis. Body dorsal color greyish-yellow with some pink markings. Head completely rufous in color including clypeus and vertex. Clypeus as long as the mandibular plates. Antennomers I and II brownish yellow, antennomers III and IV missing. Distal tenth of segment II fuscous. Antennomers I surpassing apex of head. Anterolateral margins of the pronotum convex. Pronotum greyish yellow with black deep punctations uniformly distributed, except anterolateral margins pale yellow bordered by rufous impunctate bands. Distal margin slightly rufous with concolorous punctation. Scutellum flat, mostly greyish yellow with black deep punctations uniformly distributed as on the pronotum (except for the anterolateral margins). Impunctate brownish yellow macule covering most of the mesial half of the scutellar base, followed by a median diffuse rufous macule covering about 1/3 of the scutellum. Median brownish yellow impunctate carina extending from the basal rufous macule and disappearing before the apex. Corium mostly greyish yellow with black deep punctations almost uniformly distributed, except in a small impunctate pink area in central mesocorium, and in pale yellow impunctate anterolateral margin of exocorium, bordered by impunctate rufous band. Costal margin of each corium strongly reflexed basally, posterior margin sigmoid, costal angle acute. Connexivum greyish yellow, impunctate, broadly exposed, almost as broad as exocorium. Venter greyish yellow as well as legs. All tibiae broadly, shallowly sulcate apically otherwise cylindrical. Female genital plates with distal ends of the laterotergites 8 &amp; 9 rounded (Fig. 2 C).</p><p>Comments. Rolston (1987) mentioned this female specimen in AMNH, determined by Ruckes as C. margarita, and wrote: “which conforms to the description of that species [ E. histrio] except that the posterior slope of the scutellum tumescence is punctate. In this specimen the apices of the front tibiae are flattened above and triangular. The remainder of the front tibiae is cylindrical as are all of the middle and hind tibiae. The former divergence from the description may represent intraspecific variation and the latter an oversight by Bergroth. Alternatively, this specimen may represent a third species of Epipedus ”.</p><p>In agreement with Rolston, I believe that this specimen does not correspond to C. margarita, as Ruckes assumed. Moreover, I consider that this specimen is different from E. histrio (Fig. 1 C) and that it is not an intraspecific variation. Rather, it constitutes a second, different species, as probably realized by Rolston and it belongs to the same genus Epipedus on the basis of their similar body shapes and the proportions between the length and width of the body, oblong (not rounded as in the genus Calagasma), triangular tibiae at their apex, convex anterolateral pronotum margins and antennomers I that have lengths that exceed the apex of the head. Body patterns and colors seem to be stable characters in E. histrio since they are the same in specimens from MRSN (Fig. 1 B) and UFPR (Fig. 1 C). The laterotergites 8 &amp; 9 are sufficiently different as are the designs and patterns of the dorsal surface, so E. rolstoni and E. histrio can be considered as two different species of the same genus Epipedus .</p><p>Distribution. Northern BRAZIL.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/115487BCFFDFFF93FF6BDA52AA47F800	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Lupoli, Roland	Lupoli, Roland (2016): Diagnosis of Calagasma Bergroth and Epipedus Spinola with description of Calagasma eclipsa sp. nov. and Epipedus rolstoni sp. nov. (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae: Pentatominae: Carpocorini). Zootaxa 4170 (2): 330-338, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4170.2.6
115487BCFFD8FF97FF6BDBAAAB2CFD84.text	115487BCFFD8FF97FF6BDBAAAB2CFD84.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Calagasma margarita Bergroth 1914	<div><p>Calagasma margarita Bergroth, 1914</p><p>Calagasma margarita Bergroth, 1914: 432 –433 (description); Rolston, 1987: 69 –70 (synonymy).</p><p>Materiel examined (n: 6). French Guiana, 1 ♂ syntype in Bergroth’s collection at the MZHF. There is no locality label associated with this specimen, but only a handwritten label " Calagasma margarita B." (Fig. 1 D, also available at http://id.luomus.fi/GV.39157) . French Guiana, Roura (Montagne des Chevaux RN 2 pK 22): 24.I.2010, 1 ♀, glass flight interception trap; 20.I.2013, 1 ♀ (Fig. 3 D), Lumivie® trap with blue LED (Light- Emitting Diode); 24.II.2013, 1 ♀, Lumivie® trap with blue LED; 26.VII.2014, 1 ♂ (Figs. 1 E &amp; F, 3A, B, C), GemLight® trap with one UV LED and one green LED. Régina (Les Nouragues, Inselberg): 7.I.2013, 1 ♂, glass flight interception trap, SEAG leg. (Roland Lupoli collection). The interception and automatic light traps collect the insects in a liquid medium which were harvested weekly all year long (Dalens &amp; Touroult, 2014). The insects were sorted by family by the Société Entomologique Antilles-Guyane (SEAG) as part of their French Guiana insect identification program.</p><p>Measurements. Total length: 8.4 mm (8.1–8.6); pronotum width (at humeral angles): 5.7 mm (5.4–6.0); abdomen width: 6.7 mm (6.4–6.9); head length: 1.2 mm; head width across the eyes: 1.9 mm; pronotum length: 1.7 mm. Antennomers I: 0.5 mm, II: 2.4 mm, III: 2.6 mm, IV: 2.4 mm.</p><p>Diagnosis. Background dorsal color red, with two dorsolateral greenish-brown symmetrical spots on the pronotum. More than half of the basal portion of each corium matt greenish-brown, which gives it the appearance of leather texture, the same color as the two pronotal spots (Fig. 1A, D, E). U-shaped impunctate calloused yellow spot present on the central part of the scutellum (Fig. 1A), marking a slope in the scutellum between the raised apical part and the lower basal part which are both red with concolorous punctation. Character not visible in dorsal view (Fig. 1A) but in lateral view (Fig. 1 F). Antennomers I rufous and relatively shorter, not exceeding the apex of the head, antennomers II yellow, antennomers III and IV yellow with black spots at the tip. Antennomers II shorter than antennomers III. Mandibular plates parallel along lateral margins. Anterolateral margins of the pronotum slightly concave. Callus raised upward. Venter brownish yellow as the legs. Tibiae cylindrical.</p><p>Female genital plates with posterior margins of laterotergites 8 almost flat and slightly rounded on their outer edge (Fig. 3 D). Similarly, posterior margins of laterotergites 9 with a rounded end, and gonocoxites 8 triangular.</p><p>Pygophore soft, thin and slightly sclerotized, mainly yellow with red spots (Fig. 3 A, B, C). Parameres and proctiger rufous. Ventral rim and dorsal rim poorly developed descending very low, just forming a cuticular fold, lined with red for dorsal rim, leaving proctiger and parameres completely visible in the dorsal view. Posterolateral angles of pygophore ear-shaped and covered with setae that continue along dorsal rim. Parameres posteroventrally directed, shaped like carpenter's hammers and positioned flat in pygophore, with the widest parts face to face in the dorsal view, protruding slightly on the ventral side. Proctiger cylindrical. Yellow bilobed process located just behind proctiger (Fig. 3 B).</p><p>Comments. The characteristics of the six examined C. margarita specimens resemble the description of Bergroth (1914) and not that of Spinola (1837) and Rolston (1987). The comparison between the specimen collected in French Guiana 26.VII.2014 (Fig. 1 E), the syntype from MZHF (Fig. 1 D) and the Bergroth drawing (Fig. 1A) emphasizes the care and precision of Bergroth in his description.</p><p>Although the background color of C. margarita is red, but a brighter red than E. histrio, the overlying pattern is completely different. Bergroth did not mention the three yellowish-white triangular spots bordered with black on the pronotum of E. histrio (Fig. 1 C). Similarly, the dorsolateral greenish-brown symmetrical spots on the pronotum and corium of C. margarita (Fig. 1A) are not present on the pronotum and corium of E. histrio (Fig. 1 C), whereas in E. histrio the basal part of the corium is mainly pink and sporadically punctated by black dots, with a black line bordering the outline of the corium (Fig. 1 C). The U-shaped yellow spot on the central part of the scutellum of C. margarita (Fig. 1A) is absent in E. histrio which has only a yellow spot on the basal edge of the scutellum (Fig. 1 C). The enhanced apical part of the scutellum is also absent in E. histrio . C. margarita is about 25–30 % smaller than E. histrio . The body of C. margarita is more circular than the body of E. histrio which is more oval. Also, the anterolateral borders of the pronotum are convex in E. histrio whereas they are concave in C. margarita . C. margarita antennomers II have no black spot at their tips (Fig. 1A) although E. histrio antennomers II have black spots. Spinola and Rolston also stated that antennomers II are longer than antennomers III in E. histrio, whereas the reverse is true in C. margarita (Fig. 1A). Rolston mentioned that antennomers I surpasse the apex of the head in E. histrio . This is apparent in the specimen of UFPR (Fig. 1 C). In contrast, in C. margarita, antennomers I are relatively shorter and do not exceed the apex of the head (Fig. 1A). Mandibular plates are parallel in C. margarita (Fig. 1A) whereas they are strongly reflexed along the lateral margins in E. histrio . The tibiae of C. margarita are actually cylindrical (Fig. 1 E), whereas they are triangular with a wider apex in E. histrio . Female genital plates (Fig. 3 D) are clearly different from those of E. histrio (Figs. 2A &amp; B). The posterior margins of laterotergites 8 are almost flat and slightly rounded on their outer edge in C. margarita whereas they form an acute right angle in E. histrio . Similarly, the posterior margins of laterotergites 9 in C. margarita have a rounded end whereas they form a 45° acute angle in E. histrio . The gonocoxites 8 are subrectangular in E. histrio whereas they are triangular in C. margarita . Then, all these data confirm that C. margarita is not a junior synonym of E. histrio but a valid species.</p><p>Distribution. FRENCH GUIANA, Régina and Roura.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/115487BCFFD8FF97FF6BDBAAAB2CFD84	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Lupoli, Roland	Lupoli, Roland (2016): Diagnosis of Calagasma Bergroth and Epipedus Spinola with description of Calagasma eclipsa sp. nov. and Epipedus rolstoni sp. nov. (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae: Pentatominae: Carpocorini). Zootaxa 4170 (2): 330-338, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4170.2.6
115487BCFFDBFF99FF6BDD47AC23FDF3.text	115487BCFFDBFF99FF6BDD47AC23FDF3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Calagasma eclipsa Lupoli	<div><p>Calagasma eclipsa Lupoli sp. nov.</p><p>(Figs. 1 H, I, J, 4A, B, C)</p><p>Etymology. The overall dorsal color of this insect resembles a solar eclipse by the moon. On the other hand this etymology refers to the French verb « éclipser » which means overshadowing, recalling that, for over a century, the general collection of MNHN overshadowed this small species from the sight of specialists. Calagasma means in Latin «beautiful jewel» which is not in contradiction with the beauty of C. eclipsa .</p><p>Material examined (n: 1): Holotype ♂ (Figs. 1 H, I, J). FRENCH GUIANA . Green original label: "Muséum Paris—Guyane Française—Dr. Bongrand 1913". Below, red label: "HOLOTYPE— Calagasma eclipsa —Roland Lupoli, 2016". Pygophore removed and glued on a cardboard mount pinned below the specimen. Deposited at MNHN, Paris France. ♀ unknown.</p><p>Measurements. Total length: 6.7 mm; pronotum width (at humeral angles): 4.9 mm; abdomen width: 5.4 mm; head length: 0.9 mm; head width across the eyes: 1.7 mm; pronotum length: 1.5 mm. All antennomers are missing.</p><p>Diagnosis. Insect almost circular, overall dorsal body color brown completely surrounded by a large impunctate shiny orange margin (Fig. 1 H). Head entirely shiny orange and impunctate including clypeus and vertex. Eyes brown. Clypeus shorter than mandibular plates. Mandibular plates parallel along lateral margins. Anterolateral margins of the pronotum shiny orange, impunctate and slightly concave. Callus raised upward (Fig. 1 J). Elsewhere, pronotum shiny brown with uniformly distributed deep concolorous dense punctation. Scutellum flat, completely shiny brown with deep concolorous dense punctation uniformly distributed, similarly to the shiny brown part of the pronotum. Corium mostly matt greenish brown, appearing similar to leather, with concolorous shallow punctation distributed in lines parallel to the wing veins. Apical half of exocorium shiny orange and impunctate. Anterolateral shiny orange border of exocorium strongly elevated (Fig. 1 J). Posterior margin of corium not sigmoid but almost linear, the costal angle forming a rounded corner. Connexivum shiny orange, impunctate, broadly exposed, as broadly as the exocorium. Venter brownish yellow (Fig. 1 I) as the legs (only the posterior right leg and right metafemur remain). Tibiae cylindrical.</p><p>Pygophore thick, sclerotized and dark brown (Fig. 4 A, B, C). Parameres and proctiger dark brown. Dorsal rim U-shaped leaving apparent, in the dorsal view, proctiger and parameres. Ventral rim thick, strong and almost straight in the ventral view. Posterolateral angles of pygophore very thick, ear-shaped, sclerotized, with short setae. Parameres flat and curved, postero-ventrally directed, positioned on their edge and parallel to each other. Ventral apices of the parameres reaching ventral rim and come to rest on it, apices shaped like small hands wearing tiny mittens. Proctiger cylindrical. Brown bilobed shape process located just behind the proctiger.</p><p>Comments. Although the coloring of C. margarita and C. eclipsa are completely different, several common points allow linking them to the same genus. First, the general shape of the body: both species are small with large abdomen and an average length of 8.4 mm for C. margarita and 6.7 mm for C. eclipsa . The shape of their bodies is very rounded which results in a ratio of length versus width of the body of 1.25 and 1.24 for C. margarita and C.</p><p>eclipsa, respectively, and 1.41 and 1.39 for E. histrio and E. rolstoni, respectively. C. margarita and C. eclipsa share the cylindrical tibiae that Bergroth mentioned. They also share deep concolorous punctation on part of the scutellum, a small head with parallel mandibular plates, a slightly concave anterolateral border of the pronotum, and the border of exocorium raised upward like pronotum callus. The structure of the corium of these two species is very similar. They share the same matt greenish brown color, leather appearance, with concolorous shallow punctations distributed in lines parallel to the wing veins.</p><p>Then, the presence of triangular or cylindrical tibiae seems to be a good character to separate the genus Epipedus from Calagasma, however, the scutellum structure and sculpture of C. margarita can no longer be used as a diagnostic character for the genus Calagasma since it is flat in C. eclipsa . Calagasma and Epipedus colors are likely aposematic. The pattern on C. eclipsa looks like some Coccinellidae or Cassidinae species from tropical America.</p><p>Distribution. FRENCH GUIANA, probably in the area of St-Jean du Maroni where Dr. Pierre-Charles Bongrand (1882–1928) spent more than a year between 9.I.1912 and 13.IV.1913.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/115487BCFFDBFF99FF6BDD47AC23FDF3	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Lupoli, Roland	Lupoli, Roland (2016): Diagnosis of Calagasma Bergroth and Epipedus Spinola with description of Calagasma eclipsa sp. nov. and Epipedus rolstoni sp. nov. (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae: Pentatominae: Carpocorini). Zootaxa 4170 (2): 330-338, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4170.2.6
