taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
181A87A9FF82FFBE2ECEFA75069FFD14.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15466860/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15466860	FIG. 3. Proposal of new sectional classification of Meconopsis based on cpDNA phylogeny and previous classifications by Fedde (1909), Taylor (1934), and Grey-Wilson (2014).A. Posterior probabilities are labeled above branches. The blue, purple and yellow branches on the phylogeny indicate its terminal taxon’s petal color; and the red branches highlight morphologically distinct species in Meconopsis sect. Meconopsis. Species in the same new section are marked by a color-coded bracket. B–D. The same color codes are used to indicate the placements of taxa we studied under the taxonomic schemes of (B) Fedde (1909), (C) Taylor (1934), and (D) Grey-Wilson (2014).Taxa not tested in our phylogenetic study due to lack of experimental materials are non-shaded in B, C, and D.	FIG. 3. Proposal of new sectional classification of Meconopsis based on cpDNA phylogeny and previous classifications by Fedde (1909), Taylor (1934), and Grey-Wilson (2014).A. Posterior probabilities are labeled above branches. The blue, purple and yellow branches on the phylogeny indicate its terminal taxon’s petal color; and the red branches highlight morphologically distinct species in Meconopsis sect. Meconopsis. Species in the same new section are marked by a color-coded bracket. B–D. The same color codes are used to indicate the placements of taxa we studied under the taxonomic schemes of (B) Fedde (1909), (C) Taylor (1934), and (D) Grey-Wilson (2014).Taxa not tested in our phylogenetic study due to lack of experimental materials are non-shaded in B, C, and D.	2017-05-17	Xiao, Wei;Simpson, Beryl B.		Zenodo	biologists	Xiao, Wei;Simpson, Beryl B.			
181A87A9FF81FFBE2EE5FD46026FFD48.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15466857/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15466857	FIG. 2. Morphological overview of a species in each of the proposed Meconopsis sections. A. M. bella (in M. sect. Primulinae). B. M. grandis cultivar (in M. sect. Grandes). C. M. sp. (in M. sect. Aculeatae) (possibly a hybrid between named species). D. M. speciosa (in M. sect. Aculeatae). E. M. paniculata (in M. sect. Meconopsis).	FIG. 2. Morphological overview of a species in each of the proposed Meconopsis sections. A. M. bella (in M. sect. Primulinae). B. M. grandis cultivar (in M. sect. Grandes). C. M. sp. (in M. sect. Aculeatae) (possibly a hybrid between named species). D. M. speciosa (in M. sect. Aculeatae). E. M. paniculata (in M. sect. Meconopsis).	2017-05-17	Xiao, Wei;Simpson, Beryl B.		Zenodo	biologists	Xiao, Wei;Simpson, Beryl B.			
181A87A9FF81FFBE2EE5FD46026FFD48.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15466860/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15466860	FIG. 3. Proposal of new sectional classification of Meconopsis based on cpDNA phylogeny and previous classifications by Fedde (1909), Taylor (1934), and Grey-Wilson (2014).A. Posterior probabilities are labeled above branches. The blue, purple and yellow branches on the phylogeny indicate its terminal taxon’s petal color; and the red branches highlight morphologically distinct species in Meconopsis sect. Meconopsis. Species in the same new section are marked by a color-coded bracket. B–D. The same color codes are used to indicate the placements of taxa we studied under the taxonomic schemes of (B) Fedde (1909), (C) Taylor (1934), and (D) Grey-Wilson (2014).Taxa not tested in our phylogenetic study due to lack of experimental materials are non-shaded in B, C, and D.	FIG. 3. Proposal of new sectional classification of Meconopsis based on cpDNA phylogeny and previous classifications by Fedde (1909), Taylor (1934), and Grey-Wilson (2014).A. Posterior probabilities are labeled above branches. The blue, purple and yellow branches on the phylogeny indicate its terminal taxon’s petal color; and the red branches highlight morphologically distinct species in Meconopsis sect. Meconopsis. Species in the same new section are marked by a color-coded bracket. B–D. The same color codes are used to indicate the placements of taxa we studied under the taxonomic schemes of (B) Fedde (1909), (C) Taylor (1934), and (D) Grey-Wilson (2014).Taxa not tested in our phylogenetic study due to lack of experimental materials are non-shaded in B, C, and D.	2017-05-17	Xiao, Wei;Simpson, Beryl B.		Zenodo	biologists	Xiao, Wei;Simpson, Beryl B.			
181A87A9FF80FFBF2ECEFE470576F93D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15466857/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15466857	FIG. 2. Morphological overview of a species in each of the proposed Meconopsis sections. A. M. bella (in M. sect. Primulinae). B. M. grandis cultivar (in M. sect. Grandes). C. M. sp. (in M. sect. Aculeatae) (possibly a hybrid between named species). D. M. speciosa (in M. sect. Aculeatae). E. M. paniculata (in M. sect. Meconopsis).	FIG. 2. Morphological overview of a species in each of the proposed Meconopsis sections. A. M. bella (in M. sect. Primulinae). B. M. grandis cultivar (in M. sect. Grandes). C. M. sp. (in M. sect. Aculeatae) (possibly a hybrid between named species). D. M. speciosa (in M. sect. Aculeatae). E. M. paniculata (in M. sect. Meconopsis).	2017-05-17	Xiao, Wei;Simpson, Beryl B.		Zenodo	biologists	Xiao, Wei;Simpson, Beryl B.			
