identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
1E5FB500181CFFD1FF6EFAB155FDFB87.text	1E5FB500181CFFD1FF6EFAB155FDFB87.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Megachile (Chelostomoda) Chelostomoda	<div><p>Key to the Chinese species of Megachile (Chelostomoda)</p><p>(Modified from the key by Wu (2006), female of Megachile spissula unknown)</p><p>1. Females (antenna with 10 flagellomeres).................................................................. 2</p><p>-. Males (antenna with 11 flagellomeres).................................................................... 5</p><p>2. Clypeal median lobe with two setal tufts (Figs 6, 22)......................................................... 3</p><p>-. Clypeal median lobe with four setal tufts (Fig. 23)........................................................... 4</p><p>3. T1–T5 with white apical hair bands, hair bands not narrowed medially............................... M. (C.) spissula</p><p>-. T1–T5 with white apical hair bands, but the bands on T1–T3 narrower medially............. M. (C.) guangxiense sp. nov.</p><p>4. Postgradular grooves on T2–T3 deep; scopa yellowish; S6 glabrous................................... M. (C.) ulrica</p><p>-. Postgradular grooves on T2–T3 shallow; scopa white; S6 with short black hairs.................... M. (C.) nigroapicalis</p><p>5. Hind legs obviously modified, hind femora and tibiae swollen, tarsomeres 1–4 strip-liked, fifth tarsomere round clubbed, two times as long as tarsomeres 1–4 together (Fig. 28); S1 with median projected lobe (Fig. 24) M. (C.) crabipedes</p><p>-. Hind legs not modified; S1 flat, without a conspicuous median lobe (Fig. 25)...................................... 6</p><p>6. Antenna short, only extending to apex of scutellum.......................................................... 7</p><p>-. Antenna long, extending to propodeum................................................................... 8</p><p>7. First antennal flagellomere slightly broader than long, less than half as long as second (Fig. 14)...................................................................................................... M. (C.) guangxiense sp. nov.</p><p>-. First antennal flagellomere nearly as broad as long, half the length of the second (Fig. 29)............... M. (C.) spissula</p><p>8. Mandible black, with three acute teeth, interspaces between teeth narrow (Fig. 30); outer surface of front tibia reddish-brown; hind distitarsus black (Fig. 32) M. (C.) nigroapicalis</p><p>-. Mandible brownish-black, with three blunt teeth, interspaces between teeth broad (Fig. 31); outer surface of front tibia blackish-brown; hind distitarsus brown (Fig. 33).................................................. M. (C.) ulrica</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1E5FB500181CFFD1FF6EFAB155FDFB87	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Niu, Ze-Qing;Wu, Yan-Ru;Zhu, Chao-Dong	Niu, Ze-Qing, Wu, Yan-Ru, Zhu, Chao-Dong (2012): A review of Megachile (Chelostomoda) Michener (Megachilidae: Megachilini) known from China with the description of a new species. Zootaxa 3267: 55-64, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.213045
1E5FB500181EFFD5FF6EFF1F53AFFDAF.text	1E5FB500181EFFD5FF6EFF1F53AFFDAF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Megachile (Chelostomoda) guangxiense	<div><p>1. Megachile (Chelostomoda) guangxiense sp. nov.</p><p>(Figs. 1–10, Ƥ, holotype; Figs. 11–21, 37, 38, 3, allotype)</p><p>Diagnosis. This species can be distinguished from all other Chinese M. (Chelostomoda) species by the following combination of characters: both sexes with small body size, female clypeal median lobe with two tufts of yellowish-brown setae, apical white hair bands on T1–T3 narrower medially; male antenna short, only extending to apex of scutellum, first antennal flagellomere slightly broader than long, and less than half as long as second flagellomere; hind leg unmodified; S1 unmodified, unlike other species in the subgenus that posses a conspicuous medial projection.</p><p>Description. Female. Body length 7 mm (Figs. 1.2); head broader than long, HW: HL=80: 67 (Fig.3); gena narrower than eye in lateral view, GW: EW=20: 25 (Fig.4); width of metasoma equal to that of the tegula, MtW: TW=79: 79. First antennal flagellomere slightly longer than broad, second flagellomere broader than long, first flagellomere slightly longer than second, flagellomeres 3–9 approximately as long as broad, tenth flagellomere longer than broad (Fig. 5); clypeus broader than long, with round and shallow punctures, clypeal margin trilobed, median lobe broad and shallowly emarginated medially, with two tufts of yellowish-brown setae (Fig. 6); punctures on vertex and gena larger and denser than that of clypeus; mesoscutum and scutellum with round punctures (Fig. 7), size of punctures smaller than that of vertex; mesepisternum with round punctures, size of punctures roughly equal to that of mesoscutum; T1–T5 with punctures of different sizes; mandible roughly wide apically, with 5 teeth and a large incomplete cutting edge in second interspace only (Fig. 6); fore wing with two submarginal cells of roughly equal in length, basal vein roughly convex and meeting vein Cu at acute angle, 2nd m-cu meeting the apical margin of 2nd submarginal cell, marginal cell distal to stigma on costa longer than stigma; stigma over twice as long as broad, margin of stigma in first submarginal cell longer than width of stigma, prestigma much more than twice as long as broad; jugal lobe of hind wing less than half as long as vannal lobe, vein cu-v less than half as long as second abscissa of M+Cu; pronotal lobe carinate; axilla not produced posteriorly; metanotum without median spine; scuto-scutellar fovea absent; metasoma parallel sided; anterior surface of T1 strongly concave; T2–T4 with strong postgradular grooves, not fasciate; T1–T5 with apical bands of white hairs, bands of T1–T3 narrower at medially (Figs. 8, 9); T6 distinctly concave apically in lateral view (Fig. 9); S2–S5 with apical fasciae of white hair under scopa in lateral view; pygidial plate absent; middle and hind basitarsi distinctly shorter and narrower than corresponding tibiae, fore and middle tibiae with one spine on outer side, outer side of hind tibia without spine, outer surface of tibiae without tubercles; claws simple, without inner median tooth, arolia absent (Fig.10). Clypeus, mandible, vertex, frons, antenna, pronotal lobe, mesoscutum, scutellum, and legs black. Pubescence sparse; paraocular area, pronotal lobe, posterolateral surface of propodeum with longer plumose white hairs; apex of T6 with shorter and denser dull brownish-yellow hairs. Scopa white.</p><p>Male. Body length 6 mm (Figs. 11, 12); head round, head broader than long (Fig. 13), HW: HL=77:74; gena narrower than eye, GW: EW =19: 24; width of metasoma narrow than that of tegulae, MtW: TW=74: 81. Clypeus broader than long, with round and deep punctures; vertex, genae with round and denser punctures, punctures larger than those of clypeus; mesoscutum and scutellum with round punctures, size of punctures smaller than that of vertex; antenna short, extending to the apex of scutellum, first flagellum slightly broader than long, less than half as long as second flagellomere, flagellomeres 2–11 roughly twice as long as broad and their nearly equal to each other in length (Fig. 14); mandible tridentate, no inferior projection; characters of forewing and hindwing same as in female; fore and middle tibiae with one spine on outer surface, hind tibia without spine; tarsomeres 1–3 of the foreleg flattened and broadened, triangle-shaped, apical median deeply excavated, outer surface with golden fringes (Fig. 15), inner surface of tarsomeres 2–3 with black spot (Fig. 16); middle tibial spur present, middle tarsus somewhat broadened, outer surface with long plumose white hairs; hind basitarsus much less than half the length of hind tibia and narrower than the latter, outer surface with long plumose white hairs; claws with inner median tooth, arolia absent (Fig. 17); T2–T5 with strong postgradular grooves (Fig. 18); T6 bent to ventral surface, in dorsal view, apical margin of T6 with weakly emarginated medially, median concave and lateral region bulbous (Fig. 19); in ventral view, T6 with a carina, not toothed, the carina rounded medially and extending the apex of T6, apical region of carina bulbous except median, median concave and weakly emarginated (Fig. 20); metasoma only three sterna exposed (Fig. 21). Clypeus, mandible, vertex, frons, antenna, pronotal lobe, mesoscutum, scutellum black; except inner surface of fore tibia yellowish brown, fore tarsus brownish yellow, and middle tarsus yellowish brown, other parts of all legs black. Pubescence denser than that of female; lower part of clypeus, paraocular area, lower part of gena, pronotal lobe, mesepisternum, and posterolateral surface of propodeum with longer plumose white hairs; T3–T5 postgradular grooves covered with short plumose yellowish-brown hairs; disc of S1 covered with triangle-shaped plumose white hairs, S2 with apical band of plumose white hairs (Fig. 21); coxa, trochanter, femur of fore and middle leg, and hind coxa with plumose white hairs; genitalia as in Figs. 37, 38.</p><p>Type material. Holotype, Ƥ, China, Guangxi, Jingxi, Bangliang, 23.13ºN, 106.42ºE, 5 Aug. 2010, coll. Zeqing NIU. Allotype, 3, same label information as the holotype.</p><p>Distribution. China (Guangxi).</p><p>Floral association. Unknown.</p><p>Etymology. Named after the type locality, Guangxi province, China.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1E5FB500181EFFD5FF6EFF1F53AFFDAF	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Niu, Ze-Qing;Wu, Yan-Ru;Zhu, Chao-Dong	Niu, Ze-Qing, Wu, Yan-Ru, Zhu, Chao-Dong (2012): A review of Megachile (Chelostomoda) Michener (Megachilidae: Megachilini) known from China with the description of a new species. Zootaxa 3267: 55-64, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.213045
1E5FB5001818FFD5FF6EFDAB51B5FF15.text	1E5FB5001818FFD5FF6EFDAB51B5FF15.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Megachile (Chelostomoda) crabipedes Wu 2005	<div><p>2. Megachile (Chelostomoda) crabipedes Wu, 2005</p><p>Megachile (Chelostomoda) crabipedes Wu, 2005 . Act. Zootaxon. Sin., 30(1), 164. Holotype, 3. Type locality: Yunnan, Xishuangbanna, Menglun (21.9ºN, 101.2ºE), 22 Apr. 1994, coll. Huan-Li XU. Type depository: IZCAS, Beijing.</p><p>Distribution. China (Yunnan).</p><p>Floral association. Unknown.</p><p>Specimens examined. Holotype, 13, Yunnan, Xishuangbanna, Menglun (21.9ºN, 101.2ºE), Huan-Li XU coll.; Paratypes, 333, same label information as holotype; 13, Yunnan, Xishuangbanna, Damenglung, 650m, 4 May 1958, coll. Yi-Ran ZHANG.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1E5FB5001818FFD5FF6EFDAB51B5FF15	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Niu, Ze-Qing;Wu, Yan-Ru;Zhu, Chao-Dong	Niu, Ze-Qing, Wu, Yan-Ru, Zhu, Chao-Dong (2012): A review of Megachile (Chelostomoda) Michener (Megachilidae: Megachilini) known from China with the description of a new species. Zootaxa 3267: 55-64, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.213045
1E5FB5001818FFD5FF6EFC40545CF9E2.text	1E5FB5001818FFD5FF6EFC40545CF9E2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Megachile (Chelostomoda) nigroapicalis Wu 2005	<div><p>3. Megachile (Chelostomoda) nigroapicalis Wu, 2005</p><p>Megachile (Chelostomoda) nigroapicaliss Wu, 2005 . Act. Zootaxon. Sin., 30(1), 162-163. Holotype, Ƥ. Type locality: Yunnan, Xishuangbanna, Menglun (21.9ºN, 101.2ºE, 650m), 31 Mar. 1994, coll. Long-Long YANG. Type depository: IZCAS, Beijing.</p><p>Distribution. China (Yunnan).</p><p>Floral association. Unknown.</p><p>Specimens examined. Holotype, 1Ƥ, Yunnan, Xishuangbanna, Menglun (21.9ºN, 101.2ºE, 650m), 31 Mar. 1994, coll. Long-Long YANG; Paratypes, 13, same label information as holotype; 1Ƥ, 13, Yunnan, Xishuangbanna, Menglun, 3 Apr. 1994, coll. Huan-Li XU; 333, Yunnan, Xishuangbanna, Menglun, 22 Apr. 1994, coll. Huan-Li XU; 13, Yunnan, Xishuangbanna, Damenglong, 650m, 12 Oct. 1958, coll. Zhi-Zi CHEN; 13, Yunnan, Xishuangbanna, Damenglong, 650m, 16 Apr. 1958, coll. Yi-Ran ZHANG.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1E5FB5001818FFD5FF6EFC40545CF9E2	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Niu, Ze-Qing;Wu, Yan-Ru;Zhu, Chao-Dong	Niu, Ze-Qing, Wu, Yan-Ru, Zhu, Chao-Dong (2012): A review of Megachile (Chelostomoda) Michener (Megachilidae: Megachilini) known from China with the description of a new species. Zootaxa 3267: 55-64, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.213045
1E5FB5001818FFD5FF6EFA5E553AFB17.text	1E5FB5001818FFD5FF6EFA5E553AFB17.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Megachile (Chelostomoda) ulrica Nurse 1901	<div><p>4. Megachile (Chelostomoda) ulrica Nurse, 1901</p><p>Megachile ulrica Nurse, 1901 . Jour. Asia. Soc. Beng., 151. Ƥ. Type locality: Matheran. Type: no record. Megachile saphira Cameron, 1907 . Jour. Bom. Nat. Hist. Soc., XVII, 1006. 3. Type locality: Matheran. Type: no record. Chalicodoma (Chelostomoda) saphira: Gupta, 1993 . Taxonomic Studies on the Megachilidae of North-Western India,</p><p>159–162. Ƥ, 3.</p><p>Megachile (Chelostomoda) saphira: Wu, 2006 . Megachilidae in Fauna Sin., Ins., Vol. 44, 354. Ƥ, 3.</p><p>Redescription. Male and female (Wu 2006).</p><p>Distribution. China (Beijing), India.</p><p>Floral associations. Melilotus officinalis (Fabaceae), Homonoia sp. ( Euphorbiaceae).</p><p>Specimens examined. 433, Beijing, 3–7 Jul. 1952, coll. Su-Mei GE; 6Ƥ, Beijing, 11 Jul. 1957, coll. Su- Mei GE; 2Ƥ, Beijing, 27 Jul. 1965, coll. Ying-Hen HANG; 1Ƥ, Beijing, 4 Jul. 1973, coll. Su-Fang WANG.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1E5FB5001818FFD5FF6EFA5E553AFB17	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Niu, Ze-Qing;Wu, Yan-Ru;Zhu, Chao-Dong	Niu, Ze-Qing, Wu, Yan-Ru, Zhu, Chao-Dong (2012): A review of Megachile (Chelostomoda) Michener (Megachilidae: Megachilini) known from China with the description of a new species. Zootaxa 3267: 55-64, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.213045
1E5FB5001815FFD8FF6EFF1F5533FFD5.text	1E5FB5001815FFD8FF6EFF1F5533FFD5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Megachile (Chelostomoda) spissula Cockerell 1911	<div><p>5. Megachile (Chelostomoda) spissula Cockerell, 1911</p><p>Megachile spissula Cockerell, 1911 . Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 7, 486-487. Ƥ. Type locality: Formosa (Sauter). Type depository: Berlin Museum.</p><p>Megachile spissula parvula Strand, 1913 . Suppl. Ent., no.2, 55-56. Ƥ, 3. Type locality: Sokutsu. Type depository: Deutschen Entomologischen Museum.</p><p>Chalicodoma (Chelostomoda) spissula parvula: Michener, 1962, Jour. N. Y. Ent. Soc., 70(1), 25. Ƥ, 3.</p><p>Megachile (Oligotropus) sasakiella Cockerell, 1917 . Entomologist, 50, 85-86. Ƥ. Type locality: Tokyo, Japan. Type depository: United States National Museum.</p><p>Megachile (Chelostomoides) sasakiella: Yasumatus, 1935 . Fukuoka Hakubutsugaku Zasshi, 1: 387. 3.</p><p>Megachile spissula: Wu, 1965, Econ. Fauna Ins. Sin., 9: 48-49. Ƥ, 3. Wu et al, 1988, Yunnan Bee Fauna. 51. Ƥ, 3.</p><p>Megachile (Chelostomoda) spissula: Wu, 2006, Megachilidae in Fauna Sin., Ins., Vol. 44, 351-352. Ƥ, 3.</p><p>Redescription. Male and female (Wu 2006).</p><p>Distribution. China (Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Shandong, Fujian, Guangxi, Hainan, Sichuan, Yunnan), Japan, North Korea.</p><p>Floral associations. Sophora japonica (Fabaceae), Melilotus officinalis (Fabaceae), Amomum villosum (Zingiberaceae), Vitex negundo (Lamiaceae), Homonoia sp. ( Euphorbiaceae), Malva sinensis (Malvaceae) .</p><p>Specimens examined. 233, Beijing, 2 Sep. 1963, coll. Su-Mei GE; 2Ƥ, Shanghai, 11 Aug. 1918, coll. O. Piel; 3Ƥ, Jiangsu Ihing, 29 Jul. 1933, coll. O. Piel; 2Ƥ, 13, Zhejiang, Baohua Mountain, 14 Jul. 1942, coll. no record; 2Ƥ, 533, Shandong, Jinan, 17 Jul. 1934, coll. no record; 13, Guangxi, Gongcheng, 1 Aug. 1985, coll. Jian-Guo FAN; 13Ƥ, 2033, Fujian, Fuzhou, 13, Jun. 1963, coll. no record; 233, Guangxi, Guilin, 7 Jun. 1984, coll. Su-Fang WANG; 6Ƥ, Hainan, Baotin, 18 Apr. 1960, coll. Xue-Zhong ZHANG; 233, Sichuan, Chengdu, 1 Jun. 1974, coll. Yan-Ru WU; 233, Yunnan, Xishuangbanna, Menglun, 600m, 22 Apr. 1994, coll. no record.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1E5FB5001815FFD8FF6EFF1F5533FFD5	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Niu, Ze-Qing;Wu, Yan-Ru;Zhu, Chao-Dong	Niu, Ze-Qing, Wu, Yan-Ru, Zhu, Chao-Dong (2012): A review of Megachile (Chelostomoda) Michener (Megachilidae: Megachilini) known from China with the description of a new species. Zootaxa 3267: 55-64, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.213045
