taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
F82553A59AE15B8F9D635FE90FA5407C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/174654	https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.91.21623.figure1	Figure 1. Cyrtandra gregoryi M. A. Johnson A Habit B Inflorescence C Corolla, anterior view D Calyx E Flower, lateral view F Gynoecium. Drawn from Johnson 105 (RSA) and field images.	Figure 1. Cyrtandra gregoryi M. A. Johnson A Habit B Inflorescence C Corolla, anterior view D Calyx E Flower, lateral view F Gynoecium. Drawn from Johnson 105 (RSA) and field images.	2017-12-15	Johnson, Melissa A.		Zenodo	biologists	Johnson, Melissa A.			
F82553A59AE15B8F9D635FE90FA5407C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/174655	https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.91.21623.figure2	Figure 2. Cyrtandra gregoryi M. A. Johnson and closest relative (C. ciliata) based on a molecular phylogeny by Johnson et al. (2017). A C. gregoryi shrub habit B C. gregoryi corolla, anterior view C C. gregoryi flower, lateral view D C. gregoryi axillary cyme inflorescence E C. gregoryi adaxial leaf surface F C. ciliata corolla, anterior view G C. ciliata flower, lateral view H C. ciliata cauliflorous cyme inflorescence. All photos taken in the field by M. Johnson.	Figure 2. Cyrtandra gregoryi M. A. Johnson and closest relative (C. ciliata) based on a molecular phylogeny by Johnson et al. (2017). A C. gregoryi shrub habit B C. gregoryi corolla, anterior view C C. gregoryi flower, lateral view D C. gregoryi axillary cyme inflorescence E C. gregoryi adaxial leaf surface F C. ciliata corolla, anterior view G C. ciliata flower, lateral view H C. ciliata cauliflorous cyme inflorescence. All photos taken in the field by M. Johnson.	2017-12-15	Johnson, Melissa A.		Zenodo	biologists	Johnson, Melissa A.			
F82553A59AE15B8F9D635FE90FA5407C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/174656	https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.91.21623.figure3	Figure 3. Distribution of Cyrtandra gregoryi and C. hispida on Taveuni, Fiji.	Figure 3. Distribution of Cyrtandra gregoryi and C. hispida on Taveuni, Fiji.	2017-12-15	Johnson, Melissa A.		Zenodo	biologists	Johnson, Melissa A.			
F82553A59AE15B8F9D635FE90FA5407C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/174657	https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.91.21623.figure4	Figure 4. A portion of the Maximum Likelihood phylogram from Johnson et al. (2017) based on three nuclear (ITS, ETS, Cyrt 1) and two chloroplast (psb A- trn H, rpl 32 - trn L) loci. Support values shown for each branch are bootstrap and posterior probabilities when ≥ 50 % and ≥ 0.50, respectively. An asterisk indicates 100 % BS or 1.0 PP; a dash indicates that the branch was not supported.	Figure 4. A portion of the Maximum Likelihood phylogram from Johnson et al. (2017) based on three nuclear (ITS, ETS, Cyrt 1) and two chloroplast (psb A- trn H, rpl 32 - trn L) loci. Support values shown for each branch are bootstrap and posterior probabilities when ≥ 50 % and ≥ 0.50, respectively. An asterisk indicates 100 % BS or 1.0 PP; a dash indicates that the branch was not supported.	2017-12-15	Johnson, Melissa A.		Zenodo	biologists	Johnson, Melissa A.			
DF37C854D1A250C9AA405C4A8E11091F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/174658	https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.91.21623.figure5	Figure 5. Cyrtandra hispida M. A. Johnson. A Habit B Inflorescence C Corolla, anterior view D Corolla, longitudinal section E Calyx, longitudinal section and young fruit. Drawn from Johnson 91 (RSA, SUVA), Johnson 212 (SUVA), Johnson 215 (RSA), and field images.	Figure 5. Cyrtandra hispida M. A. Johnson. A Habit B Inflorescence C Corolla, anterior view D Corolla, longitudinal section E Calyx, longitudinal section and young fruit. Drawn from Johnson 91 (RSA, SUVA), Johnson 212 (SUVA), Johnson 215 (RSA), and field images.	2017-12-15	Johnson, Melissa A.		Zenodo	biologists	Johnson, Melissa A.			
DF37C854D1A250C9AA405C4A8E11091F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/174659	https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.91.21623.figure6	Figure 6. Cyrtandra hispida M. A. Johnson and closest relative (C. cephalophora) based on molecular phylogeny by Johnson et al. (2017). A C. hispida corolla, anterior view B C. hispida flower, lateral view C C. hispida shrub habit and axillary cyme inflorescence D C. cephalophora shrub habit E C. cephalophora capitate-cylindrical cauliflorous inflorescence and young fruits F C. cephalophora corolla, anterior view. All photos taken in the field by M. Johnson, with photos of C. hispida taken from the type collection.	Figure 6. Cyrtandra hispida M. A. Johnson and closest relative (C. cephalophora) based on molecular phylogeny by Johnson et al. (2017). A C. hispida corolla, anterior view B C. hispida flower, lateral view C C. hispida shrub habit and axillary cyme inflorescence D C. cephalophora shrub habit E C. cephalophora capitate-cylindrical cauliflorous inflorescence and young fruits F C. cephalophora corolla, anterior view. All photos taken in the field by M. Johnson, with photos of C. hispida taken from the type collection.	2017-12-15	Johnson, Melissa A.		Zenodo	biologists	Johnson, Melissa A.			
DF37C854D1A250C9AA405C4A8E11091F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/174656	https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.91.21623.figure3	Figure 3. Distribution of Cyrtandra gregoryi and C. hispida on Taveuni, Fiji.	Figure 3. Distribution of Cyrtandra gregoryi and C. hispida on Taveuni, Fiji.	2017-12-15	Johnson, Melissa A.		Zenodo	biologists	Johnson, Melissa A.			
DF37C854D1A250C9AA405C4A8E11091F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/174657	https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.91.21623.figure4	Figure 4. A portion of the Maximum Likelihood phylogram from Johnson et al. (2017) based on three nuclear (ITS, ETS, Cyrt 1) and two chloroplast (psb A- trn H, rpl 32 - trn L) loci. Support values shown for each branch are bootstrap and posterior probabilities when ≥ 50 % and ≥ 0.50, respectively. An asterisk indicates 100 % BS or 1.0 PP; a dash indicates that the branch was not supported.	Figure 4. A portion of the Maximum Likelihood phylogram from Johnson et al. (2017) based on three nuclear (ITS, ETS, Cyrt 1) and two chloroplast (psb A- trn H, rpl 32 - trn L) loci. Support values shown for each branch are bootstrap and posterior probabilities when ≥ 50 % and ≥ 0.50, respectively. An asterisk indicates 100 % BS or 1.0 PP; a dash indicates that the branch was not supported.	2017-12-15	Johnson, Melissa A.		Zenodo	biologists	Johnson, Melissa A.			
6943A6D1AFCA5D159E4AE9DABBCABCDB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/174660	https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.91.21623.figure7	Figure 7. Cyrtandra longifructosa M. A. Johnson. A Habit B Corolla, staminate phase, anterior view C Mature elongate cylindrical fruit D Inflorescence and young fruit E Corolla, ovulate phase, anterior view. Drawn from Johnson 65 (SUVA, RSA), Johnson 59 (RSA), and field images.	Figure 7. Cyrtandra longifructosa M. A. Johnson. A Habit B Corolla, staminate phase, anterior view C Mature elongate cylindrical fruit D Inflorescence and young fruit E Corolla, ovulate phase, anterior view. Drawn from Johnson 65 (SUVA, RSA), Johnson 59 (RSA), and field images.	2017-12-15	Johnson, Melissa A.		Zenodo	biologists	Johnson, Melissa A.			
6943A6D1AFCA5D159E4AE9DABBCABCDB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/174661	https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.91.21623.figure8	Figure 8. Cyrtandra longifructosa M. A. Johnson and closest relative (C. dolichocarpa) based on molecular phylogeny by Johnson et al. (2017). A C. longifructosa corolla, anterior view B C. longifructosa flower, lateral view C C. longifructosa elongate cylindrical fruits D C. longifructosa axillary inflorescence and young fruits E C. longifructosa shrub habit F C. dolichocarpa corolla, anterior view G C. dolichocarpa flower, lateral view H C. dolichocarpa shrub habit. All photos taken in the field by M. Johnson, with photos of C. longifructosa taken from the type collection.	Figure 8. Cyrtandra longifructosa M. A. Johnson and closest relative (C. dolichocarpa) based on molecular phylogeny by Johnson et al. (2017). A C. longifructosa corolla, anterior view B C. longifructosa flower, lateral view C C. longifructosa elongate cylindrical fruits D C. longifructosa axillary inflorescence and young fruits E C. longifructosa shrub habit F C. dolichocarpa corolla, anterior view G C. dolichocarpa flower, lateral view H C. dolichocarpa shrub habit. All photos taken in the field by M. Johnson, with photos of C. longifructosa taken from the type collection.	2017-12-15	Johnson, Melissa A.		Zenodo	biologists	Johnson, Melissa A.			
6943A6D1AFCA5D159E4AE9DABBCABCDB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/174662	https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.91.21623.figure9	Figure 9. Distribution of Cyrtandra waisaliensis and C. longifructosa on Vanua Levu, Fiji.	Figure 9. Distribution of Cyrtandra waisaliensis and C. longifructosa on Vanua Levu, Fiji.	2017-12-15	Johnson, Melissa A.		Zenodo	biologists	Johnson, Melissa A.			
6943A6D1AFCA5D159E4AE9DABBCABCDB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/174657	https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.91.21623.figure4	Figure 4. A portion of the Maximum Likelihood phylogram from Johnson et al. (2017) based on three nuclear (ITS, ETS, Cyrt 1) and two chloroplast (psb A- trn H, rpl 32 - trn L) loci. Support values shown for each branch are bootstrap and posterior probabilities when ≥ 50 % and ≥ 0.50, respectively. An asterisk indicates 100 % BS or 1.0 PP; a dash indicates that the branch was not supported.	Figure 4. A portion of the Maximum Likelihood phylogram from Johnson et al. (2017) based on three nuclear (ITS, ETS, Cyrt 1) and two chloroplast (psb A- trn H, rpl 32 - trn L) loci. Support values shown for each branch are bootstrap and posterior probabilities when ≥ 50 % and ≥ 0.50, respectively. An asterisk indicates 100 % BS or 1.0 PP; a dash indicates that the branch was not supported.	2017-12-15	Johnson, Melissa A.		Zenodo	biologists	Johnson, Melissa A.			
03A3F8DF53FD5BCFBE58014BED49BCD4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/174663	https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.91.21623.figure10	Figure 10. Cyrtandra waisaliensis M. A. Johnson. A Habit B Cauliflorous inflorescence C Corolla, anterior view D Corolla, longitudinal section E Gynoecium F Calyx, longitudinal section and young fruit. Drawn from Johnson 48 (RSA), Johnson 50 (SUVA, RSA), and field images.	Figure 10. Cyrtandra waisaliensis M. A. Johnson. A Habit B Cauliflorous inflorescence C Corolla, anterior view D Corolla, longitudinal section E Gynoecium F Calyx, longitudinal section and young fruit. Drawn from Johnson 48 (RSA), Johnson 50 (SUVA, RSA), and field images.	2017-12-15	Johnson, Melissa A.		Zenodo	biologists	Johnson, Melissa A.			
03A3F8DF53FD5BCFBE58014BED49BCD4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/174664	https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.91.21623.figure11	Figure 11. Cyrtandra waisaliensis M. A. Johnson. A Corolla, anterior view B Flower, lateral view C Cauliflorous cyme inflorescence D Shrub habit E Rainforest understory habitat. All photos from the type collection, taken in the field by M. Johnson.	Figure 11. Cyrtandra waisaliensis M. A. Johnson. A Corolla, anterior view B Flower, lateral view C Cauliflorous cyme inflorescence D Shrub habit E Rainforest understory habitat. All photos from the type collection, taken in the field by M. Johnson.	2017-12-15	Johnson, Melissa A.		Zenodo	biologists	Johnson, Melissa A.			
03A3F8DF53FD5BCFBE58014BED49BCD4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/174661	https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.91.21623.figure8	Figure 8. Cyrtandra longifructosa M. A. Johnson and closest relative (C. dolichocarpa) based on molecular phylogeny by Johnson et al. (2017). A C. longifructosa corolla, anterior view B C. longifructosa flower, lateral view C C. longifructosa elongate cylindrical fruits D C. longifructosa axillary inflorescence and young fruits E C. longifructosa shrub habit F C. dolichocarpa corolla, anterior view G C. dolichocarpa flower, lateral view H C. dolichocarpa shrub habit. All photos taken in the field by M. Johnson, with photos of C. longifructosa taken from the type collection.	Figure 8. Cyrtandra longifructosa M. A. Johnson and closest relative (C. dolichocarpa) based on molecular phylogeny by Johnson et al. (2017). A C. longifructosa corolla, anterior view B C. longifructosa flower, lateral view C C. longifructosa elongate cylindrical fruits D C. longifructosa axillary inflorescence and young fruits E C. longifructosa shrub habit F C. dolichocarpa corolla, anterior view G C. dolichocarpa flower, lateral view H C. dolichocarpa shrub habit. All photos taken in the field by M. Johnson, with photos of C. longifructosa taken from the type collection.	2017-12-15	Johnson, Melissa A.		Zenodo	biologists	Johnson, Melissa A.			
03A3F8DF53FD5BCFBE58014BED49BCD4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/174662	https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.91.21623.figure9	Figure 9. Distribution of Cyrtandra waisaliensis and C. longifructosa on Vanua Levu, Fiji.	Figure 9. Distribution of Cyrtandra waisaliensis and C. longifructosa on Vanua Levu, Fiji.	2017-12-15	Johnson, Melissa A.		Zenodo	biologists	Johnson, Melissa A.			
03A3F8DF53FD5BCFBE58014BED49BCD4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/174657	https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.91.21623.figure4	Figure 4. A portion of the Maximum Likelihood phylogram from Johnson et al. (2017) based on three nuclear (ITS, ETS, Cyrt 1) and two chloroplast (psb A- trn H, rpl 32 - trn L) loci. Support values shown for each branch are bootstrap and posterior probabilities when ≥ 50 % and ≥ 0.50, respectively. An asterisk indicates 100 % BS or 1.0 PP; a dash indicates that the branch was not supported.	Figure 4. A portion of the Maximum Likelihood phylogram from Johnson et al. (2017) based on three nuclear (ITS, ETS, Cyrt 1) and two chloroplast (psb A- trn H, rpl 32 - trn L) loci. Support values shown for each branch are bootstrap and posterior probabilities when ≥ 50 % and ≥ 0.50, respectively. An asterisk indicates 100 % BS or 1.0 PP; a dash indicates that the branch was not supported.	2017-12-15	Johnson, Melissa A.		Zenodo	biologists	Johnson, Melissa A.			
