taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
356287D9FF8CAF224C9BFE9AFC016E76.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5320414/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5320414	Figure 12. Karyotypes of the Cylominae, without treatment. A–B, Adolopus sp., mitosis from midgut. D, Cyloma guttulatus, mitosis from midgut. E–G, Cyloma sp. (E–F, meiotic first metaphase; G, testes, mitosis;). I–M, Cylomissus glabratus: (I–J) mitotic metaphase from midgut; (K–M) meiotic metaphase I from testes. Habitus figures: (C) Adolopus sp.; (H) Cyloma sp., specimen collected with karyotyped voucher; (N) Cylomissus glabratus, from Minoshima et al. (2015).	Figure 12. Karyotypes of the Cylominae, without treatment. A–B, Adolopus sp., mitosis from midgut. D, Cyloma guttulatus, mitosis from midgut. E–G, Cyloma sp. (E–F, meiotic first metaphase; G, testes, mitosis;). I–M, Cylomissus glabratus: (I–J) mitotic metaphase from midgut; (K–M) meiotic metaphase I from testes. Habitus figures: (C) Adolopus sp.; (H) Cyloma sp., specimen collected with karyotyped voucher; (N) Cylomissus glabratus, from Minoshima et al. (2015).	2021-07-01	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin		Zenodo	biologists	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin			
356287D9FF9EAF304E25F9B9FB366A0E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5301138/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5301138	Figure 2. Karyotypes of the Amphiopini and Laccobiini. A–E, Amphiops mater, mitotic methaphase from midgut. F–L, Laccobius decorus, mitotic metaphase from midgut.A, C, F, H, J, without treatment. B, D, G, I, K, C-banded. Habitus figures: (E) Amphiops mater; (L) Laccobius decorus.	Figure 2. Karyotypes of the Amphiopini and Laccobiini. A–E, Amphiops mater, mitotic methaphase from midgut. F–L, Laccobius decorus, mitotic metaphase from midgut.A, C, F, H, J, without treatment. B, D, G, I, K, C-banded. Habitus figures: (E) Amphiops mater; (L) Laccobius decorus.	2021-07-01	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin		Zenodo	biologists	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin			
356287D9FF96AF384E25FEE8FED66D7C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5301148/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5301148	Figure 7. Mitotic karyotypes of Chaetarthriinae from the midgut.A–C: Anacaena: (A) Anacaena gaetanae; (B–C) Anacaena lutescens (B, sexually reproducing specimen; C, parthenogenetic female). E–J, Horelophus walkeri. L, Chaetarthria simillima. A, C-banded; B, C, E–J, L, without treatment. Habitus figures: (D) karyotyped voucher of Anacaena gaetanae; (K) Horelophus walkeri, from Fikáček et al. (2012a); (M) Chaetarthria seminulum, from Fikáček & Liu (2019).	Figure 7. Mitotic karyotypes of Chaetarthriinae from the midgut.A–C: Anacaena: (A) Anacaena gaetanae; (B–C) Anacaena lutescens (B, sexually reproducing specimen; C, parthenogenetic female). E–J, Horelophus walkeri. L, Chaetarthria simillima. A, C-banded; B, C, E–J, L, without treatment. Habitus figures: (D) karyotyped voucher of Anacaena gaetanae; (K) Horelophus walkeri, from Fikáček et al. (2012a); (M) Chaetarthria seminulum, from Fikáček & Liu (2019).	2021-07-01	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin		Zenodo	biologists	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin			
356287D9FF84AF2B4CE1FE5DFDB56EBC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5301152/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5301152	Figure 16. Karyotypes of the Megasternini: Cercyon. A–I, mitosis from midgut: (A) Cercyon (Dicyrtocercyon) ustulatus; (B) Cercyon (Paracercyon) analis; (C) Cercyon tristis; (D–E) Cercyon sternalis; (F–I) Cercyon convexiusculus (G–H, female, karyotypes from the same specimen showing variation in the form of chromosome 1). J–N, meiotic metaphase I from testes: (J) Cercyon convexiusculus; (K) Cercyon marinus; (L) Cercyon melanocephalus; (M–N) Cercyon haemorrhoidalis. A–M, without treatment. N, C-banded. O, habitus of Cercyon analis, from Fikáček (2019).	Figure 16. Karyotypes of the Megasternini: Cercyon. A–I, mitosis from midgut: (A) Cercyon (Dicyrtocercyon) ustulatus; (B) Cercyon (Paracercyon) analis; (C) Cercyon tristis; (D–E) Cercyon sternalis; (F–I) Cercyon convexiusculus (G–H, female, karyotypes from the same specimen showing variation in the form of chromosome 1). J–N, meiotic metaphase I from testes: (J) Cercyon convexiusculus; (K) Cercyon marinus; (L) Cercyon melanocephalus; (M–N) Cercyon haemorrhoidalis. A–M, without treatment. N, C-banded. O, habitus of Cercyon analis, from Fikáček (2019).	2021-07-01	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin		Zenodo	biologists	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin			
356287D9FF84AF2B4CE1FE5DFDB56EBC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5363407/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5363407	Figure 17. Mitotic karyotypes of Cercyon from midgut. (A) Cercyon marinus; (B–E) Cercyon lateralis; (F–G) Cercyon obsoletus; (H) Cercyon impressus; (I–K) Cercyon haemorrhoidalis; (L–N) Cercyon melanocephalus. A, B, D, F, H, I, K, L, N, without treatment. C, E, G, J, M, C-banded. Habitus figures: (O) Cercyon marinus; (P) Cercyon impressus; (Q) Cercyon haemorrhoidalis, from Fikáček (2019).	Figure 17. Mitotic karyotypes of Cercyon from midgut. (A) Cercyon marinus; (B–E) Cercyon lateralis; (F–G) Cercyon obsoletus; (H) Cercyon impressus; (I–K) Cercyon haemorrhoidalis; (L–N) Cercyon melanocephalus. A, B, D, F, H, I, K, L, N, without treatment. C, E, G, J, M, C-banded. Habitus figures: (O) Cercyon marinus; (P) Cercyon impressus; (Q) Cercyon haemorrhoidalis, from Fikáček (2019).	2021-07-01	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin		Zenodo	biologists	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin			
356287D9FF96AF384CABFD33FAFA6EB0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5301148/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5301148	Figure 7. Mitotic karyotypes of Chaetarthriinae from the midgut.A–C: Anacaena: (A) Anacaena gaetanae; (B–C) Anacaena lutescens (B, sexually reproducing specimen; C, parthenogenetic female). E–J, Horelophus walkeri. L, Chaetarthria simillima. A, C-banded; B, C, E–J, L, without treatment. Habitus figures: (D) karyotyped voucher of Anacaena gaetanae; (K) Horelophus walkeri, from Fikáček et al. (2012a); (M) Chaetarthria seminulum, from Fikáček & Liu (2019).	Figure 7. Mitotic karyotypes of Chaetarthriinae from the midgut.A–C: Anacaena: (A) Anacaena gaetanae; (B–C) Anacaena lutescens (B, sexually reproducing specimen; C, parthenogenetic female). E–J, Horelophus walkeri. L, Chaetarthria simillima. A, C-banded; B, C, E–J, L, without treatment. Habitus figures: (D) karyotyped voucher of Anacaena gaetanae; (K) Horelophus walkeri, from Fikáček et al. (2012a); (M) Chaetarthria seminulum, from Fikáček & Liu (2019).	2021-07-01	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin		Zenodo	biologists	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin			
356287D9FF81AF2F4CB1FE67FC77688A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5363405/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5363405	Figure15. KaryotypesoftheCoelostomatiniand Protosternini.A–C,Coelostomaorbiculare,embryo(A,with B-chromosomes; B–C, without B-chromosomes). D–F, Dactylosternum flavicorne, embryo. G, Dactylosternum corbetti, mitosis, midgut. J–K, Protosternum abnormale, meiotic nuclei from testes. A–F, J, K, without treatment. G, C-banded. Habitus figures: (H) Coelostoma orbiculare; (I) Dactylosternum corbetti; (L) Protosternum abnormale, from Fikáček et al. (2018).	Figure15. KaryotypesoftheCoelostomatiniand Protosternini.A–C,Coelostomaorbiculare,embryo(A,with B-chromosomes; B–C, without B-chromosomes). D–F, Dactylosternum flavicorne, embryo. G, Dactylosternum corbetti, mitosis, midgut. J–K, Protosternum abnormale, meiotic nuclei from testes. A–F, J, K, without treatment. G, C-banded. Habitus figures: (H) Coelostoma orbiculare; (I) Dactylosternum corbetti; (L) Protosternum abnormale, from Fikáček et al. (2018).	2021-07-01	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin		Zenodo	biologists	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin			
356287D9FF8CAF214CE7FA8FFDB46917.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5320414/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5320414	Figure 12. Karyotypes of the Cylominae, without treatment. A–B, Adolopus sp., mitosis from midgut. D, Cyloma guttulatus, mitosis from midgut. E–G, Cyloma sp. (E–F, meiotic first metaphase; G, testes, mitosis;). I–M, Cylomissus glabratus: (I–J) mitotic metaphase from midgut; (K–M) meiotic metaphase I from testes. Habitus figures: (C) Adolopus sp.; (H) Cyloma sp., specimen collected with karyotyped voucher; (N) Cylomissus glabratus, from Minoshima et al. (2015).	Figure 12. Karyotypes of the Cylominae, without treatment. A–B, Adolopus sp., mitosis from midgut. D, Cyloma guttulatus, mitosis from midgut. E–G, Cyloma sp. (E–F, meiotic first metaphase; G, testes, mitosis;). I–M, Cylomissus glabratus: (I–J) mitotic metaphase from midgut; (K–M) meiotic metaphase I from testes. Habitus figures: (C) Adolopus sp.; (H) Cyloma sp., specimen collected with karyotyped voucher; (N) Cylomissus glabratus, from Minoshima et al. (2015).	2021-07-01	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin		Zenodo	biologists	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin			
356287D9FF8FAF214FDEFD66FD646E71.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5320414/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5320414	Figure 12. Karyotypes of the Cylominae, without treatment. A–B, Adolopus sp., mitosis from midgut. D, Cyloma guttulatus, mitosis from midgut. E–G, Cyloma sp. (E–F, meiotic first metaphase; G, testes, mitosis;). I–M, Cylomissus glabratus: (I–J) mitotic metaphase from midgut; (K–M) meiotic metaphase I from testes. Habitus figures: (C) Adolopus sp.; (H) Cyloma sp., specimen collected with karyotyped voucher; (N) Cylomissus glabratus, from Minoshima et al. (2015).	Figure 12. Karyotypes of the Cylominae, without treatment. A–B, Adolopus sp., mitosis from midgut. D, Cyloma guttulatus, mitosis from midgut. E–G, Cyloma sp. (E–F, meiotic first metaphase; G, testes, mitosis;). I–M, Cylomissus glabratus: (I–J) mitotic metaphase from midgut; (K–M) meiotic metaphase I from testes. Habitus figures: (C) Adolopus sp.; (H) Cyloma sp., specimen collected with karyotyped voucher; (N) Cylomissus glabratus, from Minoshima et al. (2015).	2021-07-01	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin		Zenodo	biologists	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin			
356287D9FF96AF394C8AF9FDFC336C34.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5320404/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5320404	Figure 8. Mitotic karyotypes of the Enochrinae. A, Cymbiodyta marginella, embryo. B–D, European usual-looking species of Enochrus (Methydrus) from embryos: (B) Enochrus affinis; (C) Enochrus coarctatus; (D–E) Enochrus nigritus. F–G, unusual species assigned at the moment to Enochrus (Methydrus): (F) Enochrus morenae, midgut; (G) Enochrus sauteri, midgut. H, Enochrus (s.s.) melanocephalus, embryo. A–G, without treatment. H, C-banded. Habitus figures: (I) Cymbiodyta marginella; (J) Enochrus morenae.	Figure 8. Mitotic karyotypes of the Enochrinae. A, Cymbiodyta marginella, embryo. B–D, European usual-looking species of Enochrus (Methydrus) from embryos: (B) Enochrus affinis; (C) Enochrus coarctatus; (D–E) Enochrus nigritus. F–G, unusual species assigned at the moment to Enochrus (Methydrus): (F) Enochrus morenae, midgut; (G) Enochrus sauteri, midgut. H, Enochrus (s.s.) melanocephalus, embryo. A–G, without treatment. H, C-banded. Habitus figures: (I) Cymbiodyta marginella; (J) Enochrus morenae.	2021-07-01	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin		Zenodo	biologists	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin			
356287D9FF81AF2A4C7BFBF9FDA66B81.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5363405/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5363405	Figure15. KaryotypesoftheCoelostomatiniand Protosternini.A–C,Coelostomaorbiculare,embryo(A,with B-chromosomes; B–C, without B-chromosomes). D–F, Dactylosternum flavicorne, embryo. G, Dactylosternum corbetti, mitosis, midgut. J–K, Protosternum abnormale, meiotic nuclei from testes. A–F, J, K, without treatment. G, C-banded. Habitus figures: (H) Coelostoma orbiculare; (I) Dactylosternum corbetti; (L) Protosternum abnormale, from Fikáček et al. (2018).	Figure15. KaryotypesoftheCoelostomatiniand Protosternini.A–C,Coelostomaorbiculare,embryo(A,with B-chromosomes; B–C, without B-chromosomes). D–F, Dactylosternum flavicorne, embryo. G, Dactylosternum corbetti, mitosis, midgut. J–K, Protosternum abnormale, meiotic nuclei from testes. A–F, J, K, without treatment. G, C-banded. Habitus figures: (H) Coelostoma orbiculare; (I) Dactylosternum corbetti; (L) Protosternum abnormale, from Fikáček et al. (2018).	2021-07-01	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin		Zenodo	biologists	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin			
356287D9FF81AF2A4C7BFBF9FDA66B81.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5301136/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5301136	Figure 1. Tissuesof hydrophiloid beetles used for chromosome preparations (as dissected, without any additionaltreatment, (B–E) in dorsal view; (A) Helophorus grandis; (B, C, I) Laccobius bipunctatus; (D–H) Coelostoma orbiculare). A, egg with a developing embryo. B–C, internal organs of the same male specimen in translucent light (B) and on black background (C). D, internal organs of a female with digestive system pulled aside. E, internal organs of male specimen. F, details of ovarioles and associated accessory glands. G–I, detail of midgut structure on black background (G) and in translucent light (H, I). Abbreviations: accg, accessory glands; aed, aedeagus; hg, hindgut; mg, midgut; Mt, Malpighian tubes; oo, ovarioles; ovi, ovipositor; rc, regeneration crypts; tes, testes. Not to scale.	Figure 1. Tissuesof hydrophiloid beetles used for chromosome preparations (as dissected, without any additionaltreatment, (B–E) in dorsal view; (A) Helophorus grandis; (B, C, I) Laccobius bipunctatus; (D–H) Coelostoma orbiculare). A, egg with a developing embryo. B–C, internal organs of the same male specimen in translucent light (B) and on black background (C). D, internal organs of a female with digestive system pulled aside. E, internal organs of male specimen. F, details of ovarioles and associated accessory glands. G–I, detail of midgut structure on black background (G) and in translucent light (H, I). Abbreviations: accg, accessory glands; aed, aedeagus; hg, hindgut; mg, midgut; Mt, Malpighian tubes; oo, ovarioles; ovi, ovipositor; rc, regeneration crypts; tes, testes. Not to scale.	2021-07-01	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin		Zenodo	biologists	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin			
356287D9FF81AF2A4C7BFBF9FDA66B81.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5301138/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5301138	Figure 2. Karyotypes of the Amphiopini and Laccobiini. A–E, Amphiops mater, mitotic methaphase from midgut. F–L, Laccobius decorus, mitotic metaphase from midgut.A, C, F, H, J, without treatment. B, D, G, I, K, C-banded. Habitus figures: (E) Amphiops mater; (L) Laccobius decorus.	Figure 2. Karyotypes of the Amphiopini and Laccobiini. A–E, Amphiops mater, mitotic methaphase from midgut. F–L, Laccobius decorus, mitotic metaphase from midgut.A, C, F, H, J, without treatment. B, D, G, I, K, C-banded. Habitus figures: (E) Amphiops mater; (L) Laccobius decorus.	2021-07-01	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin		Zenodo	biologists	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin			
356287D9FF81AF2A4C7BFBF9FDA66B81.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5301140/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5301140	Figure 3. Karyotypes of the Laccobiini, without treatment. A–H, Paracymus: (A–B) Paracymus aeneus, mitotic metaphase from midgut; (C–D) Paracymus scutellaris (C, spermatogonial mitosis, metaphase; D, mitotic metaphase from midgut.); (E–G) meiotic metaphase I from testes (E, Paracymus aeneus; F–G, Paracymus scutellaris). I–M, Tormus, mitotic metaphase from midgut: (I, K) Tormus posticalis; (J, L) Tormus helmsi. Habitus figures: (G) Paracymus scutellaris; (M) Tormus helmsi, from Fikáček et al. (2013).	Figure 3. Karyotypes of the Laccobiini, without treatment. A–H, Paracymus: (A–B) Paracymus aeneus, mitotic metaphase from midgut; (C–D) Paracymus scutellaris (C, spermatogonial mitosis, metaphase; D, mitotic metaphase from midgut.); (E–G) meiotic metaphase I from testes (E, Paracymus aeneus; F–G, Paracymus scutellaris). I–M, Tormus, mitotic metaphase from midgut: (I, K) Tormus posticalis; (J, L) Tormus helmsi. Habitus figures: (G) Paracymus scutellaris; (M) Tormus helmsi, from Fikáček et al. (2013).	2021-07-01	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin		Zenodo	biologists	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin			
356287D9FF81AF2A4C7BFBF9FDA66B81.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5301142/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5301142	Figure 4. Mitotic karyotypes of Hydrobius. A–C, Hydrobius fuscipes, testes. D, Hydrobius arcticus, midgut. E, Hydrobius rottenbergii, testes.F–H, Hydrobius subrotundus (F, midgut; G–H, testes). I, Hydrobius pui, testes.A, D–I, without treatment. B, C, C-banded. J, habitus of Hydrobius fuscipes.	Figure 4. Mitotic karyotypes of Hydrobius. A–C, Hydrobius fuscipes, testes. D, Hydrobius arcticus, midgut. E, Hydrobius rottenbergii, testes.F–H, Hydrobius subrotundus (F, midgut; G–H, testes). I, Hydrobius pui, testes.A, D–I, without treatment. B, C, C-banded. J, habitus of Hydrobius fuscipes.	2021-07-01	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin		Zenodo	biologists	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin			
356287D9FF81AF2A4C7BFBF9FDA66B81.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5301144/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5301144	Figure 5. Karyotypes of the Hydrobiusini. A–D, Limnohydrobius convexus: (A–B) mitosis, midgut; (C–D): testis, prometaphase. F–J, Limnoxenus niger: (F–H) midgut; (I–J) meiotic metaphase I, testes. A–C, E–F, I, without treatment. D, G, H, J, C-banded. Habitus figures: (E) Limnohydrobius convexus; (K) Limnoxenus niger.	Figure 5. Karyotypes of the Hydrobiusini. A–D, Limnohydrobius convexus: (A–B) mitosis, midgut; (C–D): testis, prometaphase. F–J, Limnoxenus niger: (F–H) midgut; (I–J) meiotic metaphase I, testes. A–C, E–F, I, without treatment. D, G, H, J, C-banded. Habitus figures: (E) Limnohydrobius convexus; (K) Limnoxenus niger.	2021-07-01	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin		Zenodo	biologists	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin			
356287D9FF88AF224E2AFF39FE2E69D0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5320404/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5320404	Figure 8. Mitotic karyotypes of the Enochrinae. A, Cymbiodyta marginella, embryo. B–D, European usual-looking species of Enochrus (Methydrus) from embryos: (B) Enochrus affinis; (C) Enochrus coarctatus; (D–E) Enochrus nigritus. F–G, unusual species assigned at the moment to Enochrus (Methydrus): (F) Enochrus morenae, midgut; (G) Enochrus sauteri, midgut. H, Enochrus (s.s.) melanocephalus, embryo. A–G, without treatment. H, C-banded. Habitus figures: (I) Cymbiodyta marginella; (J) Enochrus morenae.	Figure 8. Mitotic karyotypes of the Enochrinae. A, Cymbiodyta marginella, embryo. B–D, European usual-looking species of Enochrus (Methydrus) from embryos: (B) Enochrus affinis; (C) Enochrus coarctatus; (D–E) Enochrus nigritus. F–G, unusual species assigned at the moment to Enochrus (Methydrus): (F) Enochrus morenae, midgut; (G) Enochrus sauteri, midgut. H, Enochrus (s.s.) melanocephalus, embryo. A–G, without treatment. H, C-banded. Habitus figures: (I) Cymbiodyta marginella; (J) Enochrus morenae.	2021-07-01	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin		Zenodo	biologists	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin			
356287D9FF88AF224E2AFF39FE2E69D0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5320406/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5320406	Figure 9. Karyotypes of Enochrus (Lumetus), mitosis from embryos. A, Enochrus bicolor. B–C, Enochrus ochropterus. D–E, Enochrus testaceus. F–K, Enochrus halophilus. A, B, D, F, H, I, without treatment. C, E, G, K, C-banded. Habitus figures: (L) Enochrus (Lumetus) testaceus; (M) Enochrus (Lumetus) halophilus.	Figure 9. Karyotypes of Enochrus (Lumetus), mitosis from embryos. A, Enochrus bicolor. B–C, Enochrus ochropterus. D–E, Enochrus testaceus. F–K, Enochrus halophilus. A, B, D, F, H, I, without treatment. C, E, G, K, C-banded. Habitus figures: (L) Enochrus (Lumetus) testaceus; (M) Enochrus (Lumetus) halophilus.	2021-07-01	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin		Zenodo	biologists	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin			
356287D9FF88AF224E2AFF39FE2E69D0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5320408/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5320408	Figure 10. Karyotypes of Enochrus (Lumetus). A–C, Enochrus quadripunctatus, mitosis, midgut. D–K, Enochrus fuscipennis, mitosis, midgut (H–I, specimens from Denmark, Rømø Island with the karyotypes indicating their hybrid origin). L–N, meiotic metaphase I from testes (L, Enochrus quadripunctatus, UK: East Walton, Norfolk; M–N, Enochrus fuscipennis, Denmark: Rømø Island). O–P, Enochrus fuscipennis, testes, mitotic metaphase from the same specimens as in (H–I). A, B, D, E, H, I, J, M–P, without treatment. C, F, G, K, L, C-banded.	Figure 10. Karyotypes of Enochrus (Lumetus). A–C, Enochrus quadripunctatus, mitosis, midgut. D–K, Enochrus fuscipennis, mitosis, midgut (H–I, specimens from Denmark, Rømø Island with the karyotypes indicating their hybrid origin). L–N, meiotic metaphase I from testes (L, Enochrus quadripunctatus, UK: East Walton, Norfolk; M–N, Enochrus fuscipennis, Denmark: Rømø Island). O–P, Enochrus fuscipennis, testes, mitotic metaphase from the same specimens as in (H–I). A, B, D, E, H, I, J, M–P, without treatment. C, F, G, K, L, C-banded.	2021-07-01	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin		Zenodo	biologists	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin			
356287D9FF88AF224E2AFF39FE2E69D0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5320412/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5320412	Figure 11. Karyotypes of the Acidocerinae. A–C, Agraphydrus, mitotic metaphase, midgut: (A–B) Agraphydrus decipiens; (C) Agraphydrus variabilis. D–L, Helochares: (D–E) Helochares lividus, mitosis, midgut; (F) Helochares obscurus, mitosis, midgut; (G–H) Helochares punctatus, mitosis, midgut; (I) Helochares punctatus, karyotype of male embryo with multiple y-chromosomes; (J–K) meiotic metaphase I from testes (J, Helochares punctatus; K, Helochares lividus); (L) Helochares sauteri, mitosis, midgut.A, D, F, G, I–L, without treatment. B, C, E, H, C-banded. Habitus figures: (M) Agraphydrus decipiens, from Minoshima, Komarek, & Ȏhara 2015; (N) Helochares obscurus.	Figure 11. Karyotypes of the Acidocerinae. A–C, Agraphydrus, mitotic metaphase, midgut: (A–B) Agraphydrus decipiens; (C) Agraphydrus variabilis. D–L, Helochares: (D–E) Helochares lividus, mitosis, midgut; (F) Helochares obscurus, mitosis, midgut; (G–H) Helochares punctatus, mitosis, midgut; (I) Helochares punctatus, karyotype of male embryo with multiple y-chromosomes; (J–K) meiotic metaphase I from testes (J, Helochares punctatus; K, Helochares lividus); (L) Helochares sauteri, mitosis, midgut.A, D, F, G, I–L, without treatment. B, C, E, H, C-banded. Habitus figures: (M) Agraphydrus decipiens, from Minoshima, Komarek, & Ȏhara 2015; (N) Helochares obscurus.	2021-07-01	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin		Zenodo	biologists	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin			
356287D9FF8FAF214E38FAA8FBFB6A88.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5301150/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5301150	Figure 13. Karyotypes of the Cylominae, without treatment. A, D, Exydrus gibbosus, mitosis, midgut. B–C, E, Tormissus magnulus, mitosis, midgut. F–H, Rygmodus modestus (F–G, meiotic metaphase I, testes; H, mitotic karyotype, midgut). Habitus figures: (I) Exydrus gibbosus; (J) Rygmodus modestus, from Minoshima et al. (2018).	Figure 13. Karyotypes of the Cylominae, without treatment. A, D, Exydrus gibbosus, mitosis, midgut. B–C, E, Tormissus magnulus, mitosis, midgut. F–H, Rygmodus modestus (F–G, meiotic metaphase I, testes; H, mitotic karyotype, midgut). Habitus figures: (I) Exydrus gibbosus; (J) Rygmodus modestus, from Minoshima et al. (2018).	2021-07-01	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin		Zenodo	biologists	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin			
356287D9FF8CAF224FDFFD33FB096A0D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5320412/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5320412	Figure 11. Karyotypes of the Acidocerinae. A–C, Agraphydrus, mitotic metaphase, midgut: (A–B) Agraphydrus decipiens; (C) Agraphydrus variabilis. D–L, Helochares: (D–E) Helochares lividus, mitosis, midgut; (F) Helochares obscurus, mitosis, midgut; (G–H) Helochares punctatus, mitosis, midgut; (I) Helochares punctatus, karyotype of male embryo with multiple y-chromosomes; (J–K) meiotic metaphase I from testes (J, Helochares punctatus; K, Helochares lividus); (L) Helochares sauteri, mitosis, midgut.A, D, F, G, I–L, without treatment. B, C, E, H, C-banded. Habitus figures: (M) Agraphydrus decipiens, from Minoshima, Komarek, & Ȏhara 2015; (N) Helochares obscurus.	Figure 11. Karyotypes of the Acidocerinae. A–C, Agraphydrus, mitotic metaphase, midgut: (A–B) Agraphydrus decipiens; (C) Agraphydrus variabilis. D–L, Helochares: (D–E) Helochares lividus, mitosis, midgut; (F) Helochares obscurus, mitosis, midgut; (G–H) Helochares punctatus, mitosis, midgut; (I) Helochares punctatus, karyotype of male embryo with multiple y-chromosomes; (J–K) meiotic metaphase I from testes (J, Helochares punctatus; K, Helochares lividus); (L) Helochares sauteri, mitosis, midgut.A, D, F, G, I–L, without treatment. B, C, E, H, C-banded. Habitus figures: (M) Agraphydrus decipiens, from Minoshima, Komarek, & Ȏhara 2015; (N) Helochares obscurus.	2021-07-01	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin		Zenodo	biologists	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin			
356287D9FF96AF384FC7F99EFB09699A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5301148/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5301148	Figure 7. Mitotic karyotypes of Chaetarthriinae from the midgut.A–C: Anacaena: (A) Anacaena gaetanae; (B–C) Anacaena lutescens (B, sexually reproducing specimen; C, parthenogenetic female). E–J, Horelophus walkeri. L, Chaetarthria simillima. A, C-banded; B, C, E–J, L, without treatment. Habitus figures: (D) karyotyped voucher of Anacaena gaetanae; (K) Horelophus walkeri, from Fikáček et al. (2012a); (M) Chaetarthria seminulum, from Fikáček & Liu (2019).	Figure 7. Mitotic karyotypes of Chaetarthriinae from the midgut.A–C: Anacaena: (A) Anacaena gaetanae; (B–C) Anacaena lutescens (B, sexually reproducing specimen; C, parthenogenetic female). E–J, Horelophus walkeri. L, Chaetarthria simillima. A, C-banded; B, C, E–J, L, without treatment. Habitus figures: (D) karyotyped voucher of Anacaena gaetanae; (K) Horelophus walkeri, from Fikáček et al. (2012a); (M) Chaetarthria seminulum, from Fikáček & Liu (2019).	2021-07-01	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin		Zenodo	biologists	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin			
356287D9FF9FAF3C4E28F98BFDB66A40.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5301142/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5301142	Figure 4. Mitotic karyotypes of Hydrobius. A–C, Hydrobius fuscipes, testes. D, Hydrobius arcticus, midgut. E, Hydrobius rottenbergii, testes.F–H, Hydrobius subrotundus (F, midgut; G–H, testes). I, Hydrobius pui, testes.A, D–I, without treatment. B, C, C-banded. J, habitus of Hydrobius fuscipes.	Figure 4. Mitotic karyotypes of Hydrobius. A–C, Hydrobius fuscipes, testes. D, Hydrobius arcticus, midgut. E, Hydrobius rottenbergii, testes.F–H, Hydrobius subrotundus (F, midgut; G–H, testes). I, Hydrobius pui, testes.A, D–I, without treatment. B, C, C-banded. J, habitus of Hydrobius fuscipes.	2021-07-01	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin		Zenodo	biologists	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin			
356287D9FF92AF3C4FD6FA83FAA36BA1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5301146/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5301146	Figure 6. Karyotypes of the Hydrophilini. A–C, Hydrophilus, mitotic karyotype from embryo (A–B, Hydrophilus piceus; C, Hydrophilus pistaceus). D–H, Hydrochara: (D–F) Hydrochara caraboides, mitotic karyotype, embryo; (G–H) Hydrochara flavipes, mitotic karyotype, midgut. I–J, Sternolophus solieri (I, male mitotic karyotype; J, meiotic first metaphase from testes). A, C, D, G, I, without treatment. B, E, F, H, C-banded. Habitus figures: (K) Sternolophus solieri; (L) Hydrochara caraboides; (M) Hydrophilus piceus, from Short & Fikáček (2013).	Figure 6. Karyotypes of the Hydrophilini. A–C, Hydrophilus, mitotic karyotype from embryo (A–B, Hydrophilus piceus; C, Hydrophilus pistaceus). D–H, Hydrochara: (D–F) Hydrochara caraboides, mitotic karyotype, embryo; (G–H) Hydrochara flavipes, mitotic karyotype, midgut. I–J, Sternolophus solieri (I, male mitotic karyotype; J, meiotic first metaphase from testes). A, C, D, G, I, without treatment. B, E, F, H, C-banded. Habitus figures: (K) Sternolophus solieri; (L) Hydrochara caraboides; (M) Hydrophilus piceus, from Short & Fikáček (2013).	2021-07-01	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin		Zenodo	biologists	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin			
356287D9FF92AF3C4CADFECBFB5F68B0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5301146/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5301146	Figure 6. Karyotypes of the Hydrophilini. A–C, Hydrophilus, mitotic karyotype from embryo (A–B, Hydrophilus piceus; C, Hydrophilus pistaceus). D–H, Hydrochara: (D–F) Hydrochara caraboides, mitotic karyotype, embryo; (G–H) Hydrochara flavipes, mitotic karyotype, midgut. I–J, Sternolophus solieri (I, male mitotic karyotype; J, meiotic first metaphase from testes). A, C, D, G, I, without treatment. B, E, F, H, C-banded. Habitus figures: (K) Sternolophus solieri; (L) Hydrochara caraboides; (M) Hydrophilus piceus, from Short & Fikáček (2013).	Figure 6. Karyotypes of the Hydrophilini. A–C, Hydrophilus, mitotic karyotype from embryo (A–B, Hydrophilus piceus; C, Hydrophilus pistaceus). D–H, Hydrochara: (D–F) Hydrochara caraboides, mitotic karyotype, embryo; (G–H) Hydrochara flavipes, mitotic karyotype, midgut. I–J, Sternolophus solieri (I, male mitotic karyotype; J, meiotic first metaphase from testes). A, C, D, G, I, without treatment. B, E, F, H, C-banded. Habitus figures: (K) Sternolophus solieri; (L) Hydrochara caraboides; (M) Hydrophilus piceus, from Short & Fikáček (2013).	2021-07-01	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin		Zenodo	biologists	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin			
356287D9FF9EAF314C81FB12FE906A0D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5301138/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5301138	Figure 2. Karyotypes of the Amphiopini and Laccobiini. A–E, Amphiops mater, mitotic methaphase from midgut. F–L, Laccobius decorus, mitotic metaphase from midgut.A, C, F, H, J, without treatment. B, D, G, I, K, C-banded. Habitus figures: (E) Amphiops mater; (L) Laccobius decorus.	Figure 2. Karyotypes of the Amphiopini and Laccobiini. A–E, Amphiops mater, mitotic methaphase from midgut. F–L, Laccobius decorus, mitotic metaphase from midgut.A, C, F, H, J, without treatment. B, D, G, I, K, C-banded. Habitus figures: (E) Amphiops mater; (L) Laccobius decorus.	2021-07-01	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin		Zenodo	biologists	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin			
356287D9FF92AF3C4FCAFEB7FD216839.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5301144/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5301144	Figure 5. Karyotypes of the Hydrobiusini. A–D, Limnohydrobius convexus: (A–B) mitosis, midgut; (C–D): testis, prometaphase. F–J, Limnoxenus niger: (F–H) midgut; (I–J) meiotic metaphase I, testes. A–C, E–F, I, without treatment. D, G, H, J, C-banded. Habitus figures: (E) Limnohydrobius convexus; (K) Limnoxenus niger.	Figure 5. Karyotypes of the Hydrobiusini. A–D, Limnohydrobius convexus: (A–B) mitosis, midgut; (C–D): testis, prometaphase. F–J, Limnoxenus niger: (F–H) midgut; (I–J) meiotic metaphase I, testes. A–C, E–F, I, without treatment. D, G, H, J, C-banded. Habitus figures: (E) Limnohydrobius convexus; (K) Limnoxenus niger.	2021-07-01	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin		Zenodo	biologists	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin			
356287D9FF92AF3C4FC5FC63FDB06E2A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5301144/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5301144	Figure 5. Karyotypes of the Hydrobiusini. A–D, Limnohydrobius convexus: (A–B) mitosis, midgut; (C–D): testis, prometaphase. F–J, Limnoxenus niger: (F–H) midgut; (I–J) meiotic metaphase I, testes. A–C, E–F, I, without treatment. D, G, H, J, C-banded. Habitus figures: (E) Limnohydrobius convexus; (K) Limnoxenus niger.	Figure 5. Karyotypes of the Hydrobiusini. A–D, Limnohydrobius convexus: (A–B) mitosis, midgut; (C–D): testis, prometaphase. F–J, Limnoxenus niger: (F–H) midgut; (I–J) meiotic metaphase I, testes. A–C, E–F, I, without treatment. D, G, H, J, C-banded. Habitus figures: (E) Limnohydrobius convexus; (K) Limnoxenus niger.	2021-07-01	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin		Zenodo	biologists	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin			
356287D9FF81AF2F4FEBFEEEFDE16873.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5320418/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5320418	Figure 14. Karyotypes of the Omicrini and Sphaeridiini, without treatment. A–F, Omicrini: (A–B) Noteropagus sp. from Taiwan, meiotic karyotypes from testes; (C–D) Omicrogiton insularis, mitotic karyotype, midgut; (E–F) Paromicrus sp. from Taiwan, mitotic karyotype, midgut. G–I, habitus of examined specimens: (G) Noteropagus sp.; (H) Omicrogiton insularis; (I) Paromicrus sp. J–P, Sphaeridiini: Sphaeridium; (J–K) Sphaeridium lunatum (J, testes, mitosis; K, midgut, mitosis); (L) Sphaeridium scarabaeoides, mitosis, midgut; (M) Sphaeridium bipustulatum, mitosis, midgut; (N–P) meiosis, metaphase I, testes: (N) Sphaeridium scarabaeoides; (O) Sphaeridium bipustulatum; (P) Sphaeridium lunatum. Q, habitus of Sphaeridium scarabaeoides.	Figure 14. Karyotypes of the Omicrini and Sphaeridiini, without treatment. A–F, Omicrini: (A–B) Noteropagus sp. from Taiwan, meiotic karyotypes from testes; (C–D) Omicrogiton insularis, mitotic karyotype, midgut; (E–F) Paromicrus sp. from Taiwan, mitotic karyotype, midgut. G–I, habitus of examined specimens: (G) Noteropagus sp.; (H) Omicrogiton insularis; (I) Paromicrus sp. J–P, Sphaeridiini: Sphaeridium; (J–K) Sphaeridium lunatum (J, testes, mitosis; K, midgut, mitosis); (L) Sphaeridium scarabaeoides, mitosis, midgut; (M) Sphaeridium bipustulatum, mitosis, midgut; (N–P) meiosis, metaphase I, testes: (N) Sphaeridium scarabaeoides; (O) Sphaeridium bipustulatum; (P) Sphaeridium lunatum. Q, habitus of Sphaeridium scarabaeoides.	2021-07-01	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin		Zenodo	biologists	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin			
356287D9FF81AF2F4FECFC99FE166E07.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5320418/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5320418	Figure 14. Karyotypes of the Omicrini and Sphaeridiini, without treatment. A–F, Omicrini: (A–B) Noteropagus sp. from Taiwan, meiotic karyotypes from testes; (C–D) Omicrogiton insularis, mitotic karyotype, midgut; (E–F) Paromicrus sp. from Taiwan, mitotic karyotype, midgut. G–I, habitus of examined specimens: (G) Noteropagus sp.; (H) Omicrogiton insularis; (I) Paromicrus sp. J–P, Sphaeridiini: Sphaeridium; (J–K) Sphaeridium lunatum (J, testes, mitosis; K, midgut, mitosis); (L) Sphaeridium scarabaeoides, mitosis, midgut; (M) Sphaeridium bipustulatum, mitosis, midgut; (N–P) meiosis, metaphase I, testes: (N) Sphaeridium scarabaeoides; (O) Sphaeridium bipustulatum; (P) Sphaeridium lunatum. Q, habitus of Sphaeridium scarabaeoides.	Figure 14. Karyotypes of the Omicrini and Sphaeridiini, without treatment. A–F, Omicrini: (A–B) Noteropagus sp. from Taiwan, meiotic karyotypes from testes; (C–D) Omicrogiton insularis, mitotic karyotype, midgut; (E–F) Paromicrus sp. from Taiwan, mitotic karyotype, midgut. G–I, habitus of examined specimens: (G) Noteropagus sp.; (H) Omicrogiton insularis; (I) Paromicrus sp. J–P, Sphaeridiini: Sphaeridium; (J–K) Sphaeridium lunatum (J, testes, mitosis; K, midgut, mitosis); (L) Sphaeridium scarabaeoides, mitosis, midgut; (M) Sphaeridium bipustulatum, mitosis, midgut; (N–P) meiosis, metaphase I, testes: (N) Sphaeridium scarabaeoides; (O) Sphaeridium bipustulatum; (P) Sphaeridium lunatum. Q, habitus of Sphaeridium scarabaeoides.	2021-07-01	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin		Zenodo	biologists	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin			
356287D9FF9FAF314FD4FE6FFF166834.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5301140/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5301140	Figure 3. Karyotypes of the Laccobiini, without treatment. A–H, Paracymus: (A–B) Paracymus aeneus, mitotic metaphase from midgut; (C–D) Paracymus scutellaris (C, spermatogonial mitosis, metaphase; D, mitotic metaphase from midgut.); (E–G) meiotic metaphase I from testes (E, Paracymus aeneus; F–G, Paracymus scutellaris). I–M, Tormus, mitotic metaphase from midgut: (I, K) Tormus posticalis; (J, L) Tormus helmsi. Habitus figures: (G) Paracymus scutellaris; (M) Tormus helmsi, from Fikáček et al. (2013).	Figure 3. Karyotypes of the Laccobiini, without treatment. A–H, Paracymus: (A–B) Paracymus aeneus, mitotic metaphase from midgut; (C–D) Paracymus scutellaris (C, spermatogonial mitosis, metaphase; D, mitotic metaphase from midgut.); (E–G) meiotic metaphase I from testes (E, Paracymus aeneus; F–G, Paracymus scutellaris). I–M, Tormus, mitotic metaphase from midgut: (I, K) Tormus posticalis; (J, L) Tormus helmsi. Habitus figures: (G) Paracymus scutellaris; (M) Tormus helmsi, from Fikáček et al. (2013).	2021-07-01	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin		Zenodo	biologists	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin			
356287D9FF81AF2F4E23FA65FB186AD6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5320418/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5320418	Figure 14. Karyotypes of the Omicrini and Sphaeridiini, without treatment. A–F, Omicrini: (A–B) Noteropagus sp. from Taiwan, meiotic karyotypes from testes; (C–D) Omicrogiton insularis, mitotic karyotype, midgut; (E–F) Paromicrus sp. from Taiwan, mitotic karyotype, midgut. G–I, habitus of examined specimens: (G) Noteropagus sp.; (H) Omicrogiton insularis; (I) Paromicrus sp. J–P, Sphaeridiini: Sphaeridium; (J–K) Sphaeridium lunatum (J, testes, mitosis; K, midgut, mitosis); (L) Sphaeridium scarabaeoides, mitosis, midgut; (M) Sphaeridium bipustulatum, mitosis, midgut; (N–P) meiosis, metaphase I, testes: (N) Sphaeridium scarabaeoides; (O) Sphaeridium bipustulatum; (P) Sphaeridium lunatum. Q, habitus of Sphaeridium scarabaeoides.	Figure 14. Karyotypes of the Omicrini and Sphaeridiini, without treatment. A–F, Omicrini: (A–B) Noteropagus sp. from Taiwan, meiotic karyotypes from testes; (C–D) Omicrogiton insularis, mitotic karyotype, midgut; (E–F) Paromicrus sp. from Taiwan, mitotic karyotype, midgut. G–I, habitus of examined specimens: (G) Noteropagus sp.; (H) Omicrogiton insularis; (I) Paromicrus sp. J–P, Sphaeridiini: Sphaeridium; (J–K) Sphaeridium lunatum (J, testes, mitosis; K, midgut, mitosis); (L) Sphaeridium scarabaeoides, mitosis, midgut; (M) Sphaeridium bipustulatum, mitosis, midgut; (N–P) meiosis, metaphase I, testes: (N) Sphaeridium scarabaeoides; (O) Sphaeridium bipustulatum; (P) Sphaeridium lunatum. Q, habitus of Sphaeridium scarabaeoides.	2021-07-01	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin		Zenodo	biologists	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin			
356287D9FF84AF2A4E20FF16FDB36800.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5363405/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5363405	Figure15. KaryotypesoftheCoelostomatiniand Protosternini.A–C,Coelostomaorbiculare,embryo(A,with B-chromosomes; B–C, without B-chromosomes). D–F, Dactylosternum flavicorne, embryo. G, Dactylosternum corbetti, mitosis, midgut. J–K, Protosternum abnormale, meiotic nuclei from testes. A–F, J, K, without treatment. G, C-banded. Habitus figures: (H) Coelostoma orbiculare; (I) Dactylosternum corbetti; (L) Protosternum abnormale, from Fikáček et al. (2018).	Figure15. KaryotypesoftheCoelostomatiniand Protosternini.A–C,Coelostomaorbiculare,embryo(A,with B-chromosomes; B–C, without B-chromosomes). D–F, Dactylosternum flavicorne, embryo. G, Dactylosternum corbetti, mitosis, midgut. J–K, Protosternum abnormale, meiotic nuclei from testes. A–F, J, K, without treatment. G, C-banded. Habitus figures: (H) Coelostoma orbiculare; (I) Dactylosternum corbetti; (L) Protosternum abnormale, from Fikáček et al. (2018).	2021-07-01	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin		Zenodo	biologists	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin			
356287D9FF8FAF214C83FDFAFB4B6FEF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5301150/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5301150	Figure 13. Karyotypes of the Cylominae, without treatment. A, D, Exydrus gibbosus, mitosis, midgut. B–C, E, Tormissus magnulus, mitosis, midgut. F–H, Rygmodus modestus (F–G, meiotic metaphase I, testes; H, mitotic karyotype, midgut). Habitus figures: (I) Exydrus gibbosus; (J) Rygmodus modestus, from Minoshima et al. (2018).	Figure 13. Karyotypes of the Cylominae, without treatment. A, D, Exydrus gibbosus, mitosis, midgut. B–C, E, Tormissus magnulus, mitosis, midgut. F–H, Rygmodus modestus (F–G, meiotic metaphase I, testes; H, mitotic karyotype, midgut). Habitus figures: (I) Exydrus gibbosus; (J) Rygmodus modestus, from Minoshima et al. (2018).	2021-07-01	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin		Zenodo	biologists	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin			
356287D9FF84AF2A4FD8FC95FB146AC8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5320418/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5320418	Figure 14. Karyotypes of the Omicrini and Sphaeridiini, without treatment. A–F, Omicrini: (A–B) Noteropagus sp. from Taiwan, meiotic karyotypes from testes; (C–D) Omicrogiton insularis, mitotic karyotype, midgut; (E–F) Paromicrus sp. from Taiwan, mitotic karyotype, midgut. G–I, habitus of examined specimens: (G) Noteropagus sp.; (H) Omicrogiton insularis; (I) Paromicrus sp. J–P, Sphaeridiini: Sphaeridium; (J–K) Sphaeridium lunatum (J, testes, mitosis; K, midgut, mitosis); (L) Sphaeridium scarabaeoides, mitosis, midgut; (M) Sphaeridium bipustulatum, mitosis, midgut; (N–P) meiosis, metaphase I, testes: (N) Sphaeridium scarabaeoides; (O) Sphaeridium bipustulatum; (P) Sphaeridium lunatum. Q, habitus of Sphaeridium scarabaeoides.	Figure 14. Karyotypes of the Omicrini and Sphaeridiini, without treatment. A–F, Omicrini: (A–B) Noteropagus sp. from Taiwan, meiotic karyotypes from testes; (C–D) Omicrogiton insularis, mitotic karyotype, midgut; (E–F) Paromicrus sp. from Taiwan, mitotic karyotype, midgut. G–I, habitus of examined specimens: (G) Noteropagus sp.; (H) Omicrogiton insularis; (I) Paromicrus sp. J–P, Sphaeridiini: Sphaeridium; (J–K) Sphaeridium lunatum (J, testes, mitosis; K, midgut, mitosis); (L) Sphaeridium scarabaeoides, mitosis, midgut; (M) Sphaeridium bipustulatum, mitosis, midgut; (N–P) meiosis, metaphase I, testes: (N) Sphaeridium scarabaeoides; (O) Sphaeridium bipustulatum; (P) Sphaeridium lunatum. Q, habitus of Sphaeridium scarabaeoides.	2021-07-01	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin		Zenodo	biologists	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin			
356287D9FF84AF2A4FD8FC95FB146AC8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5301136/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5301136	Figure 1. Tissuesof hydrophiloid beetles used for chromosome preparations (as dissected, without any additionaltreatment, (B–E) in dorsal view; (A) Helophorus grandis; (B, C, I) Laccobius bipunctatus; (D–H) Coelostoma orbiculare). A, egg with a developing embryo. B–C, internal organs of the same male specimen in translucent light (B) and on black background (C). D, internal organs of a female with digestive system pulled aside. E, internal organs of male specimen. F, details of ovarioles and associated accessory glands. G–I, detail of midgut structure on black background (G) and in translucent light (H, I). Abbreviations: accg, accessory glands; aed, aedeagus; hg, hindgut; mg, midgut; Mt, Malpighian tubes; oo, ovarioles; ovi, ovipositor; rc, regeneration crypts; tes, testes. Not to scale.	Figure 1. Tissuesof hydrophiloid beetles used for chromosome preparations (as dissected, without any additionaltreatment, (B–E) in dorsal view; (A) Helophorus grandis; (B, C, I) Laccobius bipunctatus; (D–H) Coelostoma orbiculare). A, egg with a developing embryo. B–C, internal organs of the same male specimen in translucent light (B) and on black background (C). D, internal organs of a female with digestive system pulled aside. E, internal organs of male specimen. F, details of ovarioles and associated accessory glands. G–I, detail of midgut structure on black background (G) and in translucent light (H, I). Abbreviations: accg, accessory glands; aed, aedeagus; hg, hindgut; mg, midgut; Mt, Malpighian tubes; oo, ovarioles; ovi, ovipositor; rc, regeneration crypts; tes, testes. Not to scale.	2021-07-01	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin		Zenodo	biologists	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin			
356287D9FF84AF2A4FD8FC95FB146AC8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5301138/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5301138	Figure 2. Karyotypes of the Amphiopini and Laccobiini. A–E, Amphiops mater, mitotic methaphase from midgut. F–L, Laccobius decorus, mitotic metaphase from midgut.A, C, F, H, J, without treatment. B, D, G, I, K, C-banded. Habitus figures: (E) Amphiops mater; (L) Laccobius decorus.	Figure 2. Karyotypes of the Amphiopini and Laccobiini. A–E, Amphiops mater, mitotic methaphase from midgut. F–L, Laccobius decorus, mitotic metaphase from midgut.A, C, F, H, J, without treatment. B, D, G, I, K, C-banded. Habitus figures: (E) Amphiops mater; (L) Laccobius decorus.	2021-07-01	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin		Zenodo	biologists	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin			
356287D9FF84AF2A4FD8FC95FB146AC8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5301140/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5301140	Figure 3. Karyotypes of the Laccobiini, without treatment. A–H, Paracymus: (A–B) Paracymus aeneus, mitotic metaphase from midgut; (C–D) Paracymus scutellaris (C, spermatogonial mitosis, metaphase; D, mitotic metaphase from midgut.); (E–G) meiotic metaphase I from testes (E, Paracymus aeneus; F–G, Paracymus scutellaris). I–M, Tormus, mitotic metaphase from midgut: (I, K) Tormus posticalis; (J, L) Tormus helmsi. Habitus figures: (G) Paracymus scutellaris; (M) Tormus helmsi, from Fikáček et al. (2013).	Figure 3. Karyotypes of the Laccobiini, without treatment. A–H, Paracymus: (A–B) Paracymus aeneus, mitotic metaphase from midgut; (C–D) Paracymus scutellaris (C, spermatogonial mitosis, metaphase; D, mitotic metaphase from midgut.); (E–G) meiotic metaphase I from testes (E, Paracymus aeneus; F–G, Paracymus scutellaris). I–M, Tormus, mitotic metaphase from midgut: (I, K) Tormus posticalis; (J, L) Tormus helmsi. Habitus figures: (G) Paracymus scutellaris; (M) Tormus helmsi, from Fikáček et al. (2013).	2021-07-01	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin		Zenodo	biologists	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin			
356287D9FF84AF2A4FD8FC95FB146AC8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5301142/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5301142	Figure 4. Mitotic karyotypes of Hydrobius. A–C, Hydrobius fuscipes, testes. D, Hydrobius arcticus, midgut. E, Hydrobius rottenbergii, testes.F–H, Hydrobius subrotundus (F, midgut; G–H, testes). I, Hydrobius pui, testes.A, D–I, without treatment. B, C, C-banded. J, habitus of Hydrobius fuscipes.	Figure 4. Mitotic karyotypes of Hydrobius. A–C, Hydrobius fuscipes, testes. D, Hydrobius arcticus, midgut. E, Hydrobius rottenbergii, testes.F–H, Hydrobius subrotundus (F, midgut; G–H, testes). I, Hydrobius pui, testes.A, D–I, without treatment. B, C, C-banded. J, habitus of Hydrobius fuscipes.	2021-07-01	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin		Zenodo	biologists	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin			
356287D9FF92AF3C4CB9FBDAFA866EBB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5301146/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5301146	Figure 6. Karyotypes of the Hydrophilini. A–C, Hydrophilus, mitotic karyotype from embryo (A–B, Hydrophilus piceus; C, Hydrophilus pistaceus). D–H, Hydrochara: (D–F) Hydrochara caraboides, mitotic karyotype, embryo; (G–H) Hydrochara flavipes, mitotic karyotype, midgut. I–J, Sternolophus solieri (I, male mitotic karyotype; J, meiotic first metaphase from testes). A, C, D, G, I, without treatment. B, E, F, H, C-banded. Habitus figures: (K) Sternolophus solieri; (L) Hydrochara caraboides; (M) Hydrophilus piceus, from Short & Fikáček (2013).	Figure 6. Karyotypes of the Hydrophilini. A–C, Hydrophilus, mitotic karyotype from embryo (A–B, Hydrophilus piceus; C, Hydrophilus pistaceus). D–H, Hydrochara: (D–F) Hydrochara caraboides, mitotic karyotype, embryo; (G–H) Hydrochara flavipes, mitotic karyotype, midgut. I–J, Sternolophus solieri (I, male mitotic karyotype; J, meiotic first metaphase from testes). A, C, D, G, I, without treatment. B, E, F, H, C-banded. Habitus figures: (K) Sternolophus solieri; (L) Hydrochara caraboides; (M) Hydrophilus piceus, from Short & Fikáček (2013).	2021-07-01	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin		Zenodo	biologists	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin			
356287D9FF8FAF2F4CBFFB11FDDD6A59.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5301150/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5301150	Figure 13. Karyotypes of the Cylominae, without treatment. A, D, Exydrus gibbosus, mitosis, midgut. B–C, E, Tormissus magnulus, mitosis, midgut. F–H, Rygmodus modestus (F–G, meiotic metaphase I, testes; H, mitotic karyotype, midgut). Habitus figures: (I) Exydrus gibbosus; (J) Rygmodus modestus, from Minoshima et al. (2018).	Figure 13. Karyotypes of the Cylominae, without treatment. A, D, Exydrus gibbosus, mitosis, midgut. B–C, E, Tormissus magnulus, mitosis, midgut. F–H, Rygmodus modestus (F–G, meiotic metaphase I, testes; H, mitotic karyotype, midgut). Habitus figures: (I) Exydrus gibbosus; (J) Rygmodus modestus, from Minoshima et al. (2018).	2021-07-01	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin		Zenodo	biologists	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin			
356287D9FF9FAF314E3AFC4EFDC26D32.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5301140/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5301140	Figure 3. Karyotypes of the Laccobiini, without treatment. A–H, Paracymus: (A–B) Paracymus aeneus, mitotic metaphase from midgut; (C–D) Paracymus scutellaris (C, spermatogonial mitosis, metaphase; D, mitotic metaphase from midgut.); (E–G) meiotic metaphase I from testes (E, Paracymus aeneus; F–G, Paracymus scutellaris). I–M, Tormus, mitotic metaphase from midgut: (I, K) Tormus posticalis; (J, L) Tormus helmsi. Habitus figures: (G) Paracymus scutellaris; (M) Tormus helmsi, from Fikáček et al. (2013).	Figure 3. Karyotypes of the Laccobiini, without treatment. A–H, Paracymus: (A–B) Paracymus aeneus, mitotic metaphase from midgut; (C–D) Paracymus scutellaris (C, spermatogonial mitosis, metaphase; D, mitotic metaphase from midgut.); (E–G) meiotic metaphase I from testes (E, Paracymus aeneus; F–G, Paracymus scutellaris). I–M, Tormus, mitotic metaphase from midgut: (I, K) Tormus posticalis; (J, L) Tormus helmsi. Habitus figures: (G) Paracymus scutellaris; (M) Tormus helmsi, from Fikáček et al. (2013).	2021-07-01	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin		Zenodo	biologists	Angus, Robert B;Sadílek, David;Shaarawi, Fatma;Dollimore, Hayley;Liu, Hsing-Che;Seidel, Matthias;Sýkora, Vít;Fikáček, Martin			
