taxonID	type	description	language	source
3E1487C52E02FFF9FF6C2F7507D4F841.taxon	description	Rhinoleucophenga obesa (Loew): [many of the following references may be based on misidentifications, see comments below] Malloch and McAtee, 1924: 33 (synonymy); Duda, 1927: 42 (key, description, synonymy); Curran, 1934: 324 ff. (description, figures); Costa Lima, 1935: 62 (description, figures, biology); Brimley, 1938: 388 (distribution): Parish and Cushing, 1938: 754 (distribution); Clausen, 1940: 413 (biology); Fulmek, 1943: 82 (biology); Patterson, 1943: 36, plate II (description, distribution, figure); Malogolowkin, 1946: 416 (synonymy, key, description, figure; Hsu, 1949: 87 (description, figures); da Costa Lima, 1950: 247 (affiliation); Thompson, 1950: 1 (biology); Grandi, 1951: 458 (biology); Thompson, 1951: 12 (biology); Wheeler, 1952: 193, 194 (synonymy, distribution); Box, 1953: 83 (biology); de Castro, 1953: 365 (description); Wheeler, 1959: 194 (affiliation); Throckmorton, 1962: 213 ff. (description, figures, phylogeny); Wheeler, 1965: 763 (affiliation); Wheeler, 1970: 79.5 (affiliation); Wheeler and Takada, 1971: 227 (description, figures); Ashburner, 1981: 407 (biology); Val et al., 1981: 135 (distribution); Wheeler, 1981 a: 29 (affiliation); Wheeler, 1981 b: 112 (distribution); Ferrar, 1987: 149 (biology); Grimaldi, 1990: 55 ff. (description, figures, phylogeny); Vilela, 1990: 499 ff. (synonymy); Remsen and O’Grady, 2002: (phylogeny, distribution); Blauth and Gottschalk, 2007: 91 (distribution); De Toni et al., 2007: 207 ff. (biology); Gottschalk et al., 2007: 854 (distribution); Chaves and Tidon, 2008: 344 (distribution); Gottschalk et al., 2008: 510 (distribution); Hochmüller et al., 2010: 290 (distribution); van der Linde et al., 2010: 29 (phylogeny); Junges and Gottschalk, 2014: distribution; Poppe et al., 2014: 220 (key, distribution); Poppe et al., 2015: 362 (key, description, figures); Roque et al., 2015: 73 (distribution); Poppe et al., 2017: 252 (distribution, phylogeny); Poppe et al., 2018 (distribution, comparison).	en	Vilela, Carlos R., Bächli, Gerhard (2019): On the identities of Rhinoleucophenga pallida Hendel and Rhinoleucophenga obesa (Loew) (Diptera, Drosophilidae), with description of a new sibling species from Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 63 (2): 149-182, DOI: 10.1016/j.rbe.2019.01.001, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbe.2019.01.001
3E1487C52E19FFE0FFAB2C950605F922.taxon	materials_examined	Type locality Brazil, State of São Paulo, City of São Paulo, Parque Estadual da Cantareira [Cantareira State Park]. Diagnosis Body length about 5 mm. General colour yellowish. Wing with both crossveins brownish shadowed, costal border slightly darkened, darker towards wing tip, also tip of r 1 slightly darkened. Frons with about 150 interfrontal setulae. Frontal index about 1.10 – 1 – 20. Arista with 7 – 11 long dorsal, 6 – 9 long ventral and about 6 – 8 short inner branches, plus short terminal fork. Epandrium sparsely setose and only at distal 1 / 3 (proximal 2 / 3 devoid of setae). Surstylus with a conspicuously sinuate row of ca. 25 evenly spaced, quite long, and roundish-tipped prensisetae. Aedeagus dorsoventrally flattened, somewhat ringed, toilet seat-shaped, distally bearing one dorsal, folded over itself, pentagon-shaped sclerite. Outer paraphysis dorsoventrally flattened, proximally not bifid (as in R. obesa, but bifid or even trifid in R. gigantea, Fig. 71), slightly shorter than aedeagus, distally widened and bearing four setulae (slightly widened distally and devoid of setulae in R. gigantea, not widened distally but devoid of setulae in R. obesa). Aedeagal apodeme distally deeply (or not so) bifid with sharply pointed (or somewhat squared) tips not remarkably turned inwards; ventral rod tilde-shaped in lateral view, mostly membranous. Material examined Holotype ♂, labelled: “ Brasilia, [Brazil] / Cantareira S. P. [São Paulo state] / I. 1953 / da Cunha leg. // Rhinoleucophenga / Cantareira [both handwritten] // Rhinoleucophenga / obesa Loew / G. Bächli det. // Rhinoleucophenga / cantareira sp. nov. / Vilela & Bächli det. 2017 // HOLOTYPE ” [microvial with terminalia and other abdomen remains] (ZMZ). Paratype ♂, labelled: “ Brasilia [Brazil], S. P. [São Paulo state] L 634 / São Sebastião / 19. – 20. III. 1986 / v. Tschirnhaus leg. // L 635 Brazil [handwritten] / Universität Bielefeld // ♂ // Rhinoleucophenga / cantareira sp. nov. / Vilela & Bächli det. 2017 // PARATYPE ” [microvial with terminalia and other abdomen remains] (ZMZ). Paratype ♀ [# 2], labelled: “ Brasilia, [Brazil] S. P. [São Paulo state] / X 524 São Sebastião / 19. – 20. III. 1986 / v. Tschirnhaus leg. // X 524 Brazil // Dros. sp. [all handwritten] // leg. et det. M. v. Tschirnhaus // ♀ // Rhinoleucophenga / obesa Loew / G. Bächli det. // Rhinoleucophenga / cantareira sp. nov. / Vilela & Bächli det. 2017 // PARATYPE ” (ZMZ). Paratype ♀ [# 3], labelled: “ Brasilia, [Brazil] S. P. [São Paulo state] L 634 / São Sebastião / 19. – 20. III. 1986 / v. Tschirnhaus leg. // ♀ // Rhinoleucophenga / obesa Loew / G. Bächli det. // Rhinoleucophenga / cantareira sp. nov. / Vilela & Bächli det. 2017 // PARATYPE ” (ZMZ).	en	Vilela, Carlos R., Bächli, Gerhard (2019): On the identities of Rhinoleucophenga pallida Hendel and Rhinoleucophenga obesa (Loew) (Diptera, Drosophilidae), with description of a new sibling species from Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 63 (2): 149-182, DOI: 10.1016/j.rbe.2019.01.001, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbe.2019.01.001
