identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
432B8793FFC5FFD9FF768248FD3BFDF9.text	432B8793FFC5FFD9FF768248FD3BFDF9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Stenosigma allegrum (Zavattari 1912)	<div><p>Stenosigma allegrum (Zavattari, 1912)</p><p>(Figs. 1, 8, 15, 20, 25, 28)</p><p>Eumenes allegrus ZaVattari, 1912: 83 .</p><p>Stenosigma allegrum; GiOrdani SOika, 1978: 408. GiOrdani SOika, 1990: 148. Hermes et al., 2014: 456, 464, 480, 482, 483, 484. Hermes &amp; Ferreira, 2016: 123.</p><p>Type data: Holotype female (ZMHB). Examined.</p><p>Type locality: Alegrete, Brazil.</p><p>Comments and Diagnosis. Stenosigma allegrum, the type species of the genus, was transferred from Eumenes by Giordani Soika (1978). The species is easily recognized by the pronotal carina without an evident lamella (Fig. 15) and by the dense and deep punctation of the pronotum and mesepisternum (Fig. 20). Additionally, S. allegrum has the typical blackish and brownish color of the integument (Fig. 1) also present in the species S. humerale and S. quechua, but differs from these by having the lateral margins of T1 distinctly fused ventrally in the basal portion (Fig. 28). The species was first reported from “Allegretto” (type locality) and Nova Teutonia—both localities in southern Brazil. However, its distribution is apparently broader with new collection records in the southeast of the country (Minas Gerais, Espírito Santo and São Paulo).</p><p>Type Material. Brazil, “Alegretto”: holotype ♀ (ZMHB), ‘3119’ ‘...’ (green label, unreadable) ‘Typus’ ‘Type’ (red label) ‘ Eumenes \ allegrus Zav. \ ♀ E. Zavattari, det.’.</p><p>Additional material examined. Brazil, Espírito Santo: 1 ♀ (UFES), ‘ UFES n°\ 96078’ ‘ BRASIL, ES, Sta.</p><p><a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-40.747585&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-20.074167" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -40.747585/lat -20.074167)">Maria de Jabibá</a> \ Faz. Clarindo Krüger\ 20°04’27’’S 40°44’51.3’’W \ 29.xi.–06.xii.2002, Malaise T 7\ Tavares,</p><p>Azevedo &amp;eq. col.’ ‘ Stenosigma \ umerale GS ♀’. Brazil, Santa Catarina: 1 ♀ (AMNH), ‘Nova Teutonia\ Santa Catarina\ BRAZIL III-14-66 \ Fritz Plaumann’ (partially handwritten label); 1 ♂ (AMNH), ‘Nova Teutonia\ Santa Catarina\ BRAZIL I-66 \ Fritz Plaumann’ ‘ Stenosigma ♂\ allegrum (Zav.) \ det. d. v. d. Vecht 79’; 1 Brazil, Cantareira: 1 ♀ (AMNH), ‘Cantareira\ Coher’ (handwritten label) ‘ Stenosigma \ Det. J. M. Carpenter’ (partially handwritten label) ‘ Stenosigma ♀\ allegrum (Zav.) \ Y. C. Grandinete det. 2015’ (partially handwritten label); Brazil, São Paulo: 1 ♀ (CEUFLA), ‘Brasil, São Paulo,\ Campos do Jordão\ Serra da Mantiqueira\ 1508m. 21.x.2013 \ Locher, G. A. col.’; 1 ♀ (CEUFLA) ‘Brasil, São Paulo,\ Taubaté, Serra da\ Quebrada, Cargulho\ 18.i.2014 \ Locher, G. A. col.’. Brazil, Minas Gerais: 1 ♀ (CEUFLA), ‘Brasil, Minas Gerais\ Ingaí, Res. Biol.\ Boqueirão 21°20’47”S\ 44°59’27”W. 2009/2010\ M. H. Simões’.</p><p>Collecting Records. Brazil [Alegrete (RS); Nova Teutonia (SC); Sta. Maria de Jetibá (ES); Ingaí (MG); Taubaté, Campos do Jordão, Serra da Cantareira (SP)].</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/432B8793FFC5FFD9FF768248FD3BFDF9	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Ferreira, Wellington D.;De Oliveira, Letícia A.;Hermes, Marcel G.	Ferreira, Wellington D., De Oliveira, Letícia A., Hermes, Marcel G. (2018): A revision of the Neotropical eumenine wasp genus Stenosigma Giordani Soika, 1978 (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Zootaxa 4455 (3): 499-512, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4455.3.6
432B8793FFC7FFD9FF768574FD19FB17.text	432B8793FFC7FFD9FF768574FD19FB17.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Stenosigma humerale Giordani Soika 1990	<div><p>Stenosigma humerale Giordani Soika, 1990</p><p>(Figs. 2, 9, 18, 21, 30, 31)</p><p>Stenosigma humerale GiOrdani SOika, 1990: 148 (in the key); 155.</p><p>Stenosigma humerale; Hermes &amp; Ferreira, 2016: 123 –126.</p><p>Type data: Holotype female (MSVE). Examined.</p><p>Type locality: Mapiri, Bolivia.</p><p>Comments and Diagnosis. S. humerale was described by Giordani Soika (1990) and is quite different from previously recognized species in the genus ( S. allegrum, S. testaceum and S. imitans). The sparse punctures of the pronotum and mesepisternum (Figs. 18, 21); the lateral margins of T1 not completely fused ventrally (Fig. 30); and the flat, little developed pre-apical fossa of T1 (Fig. 31) are a set of distinctive features of this species (Hermes &amp; Ferreira, 2016, p. 124). In addition, this species has large body size and melanic coloration (Fig. 2) that resembles species of Pachymenes (Hermes &amp; Ferreira, 2016) . For a listing of other diagnostic features for the species see Hermes and Ferreira (2016, p. 124).</p><p>Type Material. Bolivia, Mapiri: holotype ♀ (MSNVE), ‘Mapiri\Bolivia’ ‘60’ ‘64’ ‘velutinum\ Ducke’ ‘ Holotypus \ Stenosigma \ humerale ’ (red label) ‘clipeo’ (handwriten label). Bolívia, Coroico: allotype ♂ (MSNVE), ‘Coroico\ Bolivia’ ‘ ♂ ’ ‘ Allotypus \ Stenosigma \ humerale ’ (red label) ‘clipeo’ (handwritten label).</p><p>Collecting Records. Bolivia (Mapiri, Coroico).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/432B8793FFC7FFD9FF768574FD19FB17	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Ferreira, Wellington D.;De Oliveira, Letícia A.;Hermes, Marcel G.	Ferreira, Wellington D., De Oliveira, Letícia A., Hermes, Marcel G. (2018): A revision of the Neotropical eumenine wasp genus Stenosigma Giordani Soika, 1978 (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Zootaxa 4455 (3): 499-512, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4455.3.6
432B8793FFC7FFDEFF76822AFA4CFEFC.text	432B8793FFC7FFDEFF76822AFA4CFEFC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Stenosigma imitans (Ducke 1911)	<div><p>Stenosigma imitans (Ducke, 1911)</p><p>(Figs. 3, 10)</p><p>Pachymenes imitans DUcke, 1911: 188, 192.</p><p>Pachymenes imitans; NascimentO &amp; OVeral, 1979: 8. Van der Vecht, 1981: 122.</p><p>Stenosigma imitans; GiOrdani SOika, 1990: 148, 152. Hermes &amp; Ferreira, 2016: 123.</p><p>Type data: Holotype female (MPEG).</p><p>Type locality: Oyapoc, Brazil.</p><p>Comments and Diagnosis. This species is easily recognized by the shorter clypeus, with length and width subequal (Fig. 10). The clypeus is slightly emarginate, without carinae in the apical portion. This diagnostic feature is unique among the species of Stenosigma —in all other species the clypeus is longer than wide (compare Fig. 10 with Figs. 8, 9, 11–14). We have observed this condition in specimens of both sexes, unlike Giordani Soika (1990) who presented this character as unique to males in his identification key (Giordani Soika, 1990, p. 148). Unfortunately, the holotype is damaged, but the head has been preserved and can be seen in frontal view, allowing observation of the diagnostic character for this species, namely the shorter clypeus.</p><p>Type Material. Brazil, Para, Poste brasilien de l’Oyapoc: holotype ♀ (MPEG).</p><p>Additional material examined. Costa Rica, Alhajuelo: 1 ♀ (AMNH), ‘Alhajuelo\ PanApr 10.11\ AugustBusck’ ‘ Stenosigma \ testaceum \ (Fox)\ Det. J. M. Carpenter’ (partially handwritten label). Brasil, Manacapurú: 1 ♀ (AMNH), ‘Manacapurú\ Brazil\ S. M. Klages’ ‘ Stenosigma ♀\ imitans (Ducke) \ Y. C. Grandinete det. 2015’ (partially handwritten label). Brazil, Roraima: 1 ♂ (INPA), ‘BRASIL-Roraima\ Rio Uraricoera\ Ilha de Maraca\ 02–13.v.1987 ’ ‘Eq. J. A. Rafael\ Arm. de Malaise’ ‘ Stenosigma \ imitans (Ducke) \ M. G. Hermes det. 2008’.</p><p>Collecting Records. Panama, Colombia, Costa Rica (Alhajuelo [new record]), Brazil (Manacapuru, Belém).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/432B8793FFC7FFDEFF76822AFA4CFEFC	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Ferreira, Wellington D.;De Oliveira, Letícia A.;Hermes, Marcel G.	Ferreira, Wellington D., De Oliveira, Letícia A., Hermes, Marcel G. (2018): A revision of the Neotropical eumenine wasp genus Stenosigma Giordani Soika, 1978 (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Zootaxa 4455 (3): 499-512, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4455.3.6
432B8793FFC1FFDFFF768783FC85F97A.text	432B8793FFC1FFDFFF768783FC85F97A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Stenosigma mariae Ferreira & De Oliveira & Hermes 2018	<div><p>Stenosigma mariae Ferreira &amp; Hermes, new species</p><p>(Figs. 4, 11, 16, 23, 26)</p><p>Comments and diagnosis. It differs from the other species in the genus by the following set of characters: pronotal carina with lamella developed dorsally (Fig. 16); sternopleural carina not developed; dorsal sulcus of the mesepisternum cariniform; without evident striation in the propodeum; and humerus with a prominent projection (Fig. 23). It differs particularly from S. testaceum, a similar and closely related species, by the presence of the humeral projection (Fig. 23); T1 with a basal elevation; the apical lamella of the clypeus truncated (Fig. 11); and the sculpture of the body with denser and deeper punctation, with a corrugated appearance on the dorsal portion of the pronotum (Fig. 16, 26).</p><p>Description. Holotype female. Body length (from head to apex of T1): 11.8 mm; Fore wing length (from mid tegula to apex): 8 mm.</p><p>Color. Head and mesosoma with yellow integument. Metasoma yellow-brownish. Black marks as follows: surrounding middle ocellus; U-shaped mark, with extremities at frons and base on vertex, surrounding lateral ocelli; band in occipital region connecting posterior compound eyes; broad shiny mark covering anterior pronotum, except edges of lower extremity; short marks on dorsal pronotum; bright spot below tegulae; three broad bands in mesepisternum, larger on anterior region, converging to single mark in mesoscutum, trident shaped; mark on lower portion of metanotum; thin marks at apical propodeum margin and around propodeal carina; mark on upper surface of propodeum; short mark at T1 base; elongated band at S1 base; triangular mark on T2. Antenna reddish yellow. Anterior legs yellow; middle and hind legs brown-yellowish. Wings dark brown anteriorly, clearer posteriorly.</p><p>Pilosity. Long bristles concentrated in margin of mandible and anterior pronotal surface. Fine, whitish bristles on clypeus. Remaining bristles short.</p><p>Sculpture. Clypeus smooth, without macro-punctation, with few sparse shallow punctures; frons with dense punctation; sparse punctation from vertex to occiput; pronotum dorsally with wrinkled appearance, with dense punctation, and laterally, below humeral region, with shallow and little evident punctures; mesepisternum with dense coarse punctation above dorsal sulcus, below with sparse punctation; scutum, scutellum, and metanotum with dense punctation, with punctures deeper than those found in pronotum; propodeum with dense and deep punctation dorsally, and shallower and sparse punctation laterally; T1 with evident punctation apically; T2 without punctation.</p><p>Structure. Labrum rounded apically. Clypeus longer than wide, apical region emarginated, short not carinate, lamella well-developed at margins, apex truncate; inter-antennal region narrow, smaller than an antennal alveolus, with cariniform elevation; pronotal carina developed throughout, lamelliform dorsally; humeral projection evident, with marked depression between dorsal portion and latero-inferior portion of pronotum; pronotal fovea rounded; tegulae slightly depressed at medial margin; mesoepisternum with dorsal developed carina at dorsal sulcus; declivity accentuated between mesoscutum and scutellum; propodeum with well-developed medial projection, without evident striation; T1 with basal elevation; pre-apical fossa elongated, slit-shaped; T2 longer than wide, with an apical lamella.</p><p>Male unknown.</p><p>Etymology. The name is an indirect reference to the type-locality: " Madre de Dios ". In the Christian tradition the mother of God is represented by the Virgin Mary.</p><p>Type Material. Holotype female (AMNH): ‘ PERU: Madre de Dios \ Tambopata Wild. Res.\ 12°51’S, 69°17’W, 290m. \ 22–25 January, 1985\ J. Carpenter &amp; D. Bowers’ ‘ Pachymenes \ det. J. M. Carpenter’ ‘ Stenosigma aff ♀ \ imitans’ (handwritten label) ‘ AMNH 0015’.</p><p>Collecting Records. Known only from the type-locality.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/432B8793FFC1FFDFFF768783FC85F97A	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Ferreira, Wellington D.;De Oliveira, Letícia A.;Hermes, Marcel G.	Ferreira, Wellington D., De Oliveira, Letícia A., Hermes, Marcel G. (2018): A revision of the Neotropical eumenine wasp genus Stenosigma Giordani Soika, 1978 (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Zootaxa 4455 (3): 499-512, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4455.3.6
432B8793FFC1FFDCFF7681F4FDDEF83D.text	432B8793FFC1FFDCFF7681F4FDDEF83D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Stenosigma panamensis Ferreira & De Oliveira & Hermes 2018	<div><p>Stenosigma panamensis Ferreira &amp; Hermes new species</p><p>(Figs. 5, 12, 19, 22, 29)</p><p>Comments and diagnosis. This species is quite similar to S. humerale, S. allegrum and S. quechua, sharing with them the absence of dorsolateral lamella on the pronotal carina (Fig. 19) and the predominantly black body color (Fig. 5). It differs from S. allegrum by the sparse punctation on the dorsal surface of pronotum (Figs. 19, 22) and by the lateral margins of the T1 not touching ventrally, widely separated basally (Fig. 29). Stenosigma panamensis differs from S. quechua and S. humerale by the sharp-cornered pronotal carina (in the form of a “Z”) in the dorsolateral surface of the pronotum (Fig. 19), and by the clypeal disc of female evenly flat all along, without a sub apical depression (Fig. 12).</p><p>Description. Holotype female. Body length (from head to apex of T1): 13.1 mm; Fore wing length (from mid tegula to apex): 9.5 mm.</p><p>Color. Head and mesosoma predominantly blackish, yellow and brown sparse spots. Metasoma bright-brown. Yellow spots as follows: entire mandible, except for margins; broad spots on apex of clypeus; small spots laterally to antennal sockets; spot flanking margin of tegula. Brown spots as follows: edge of compound eye; region posterior to pretegular carina, near dorsal sulcus of mesepisternum; thin band on gena, near posterior margin of compound eye. Apical portion of antenna orange; scape, pedicel and F1 blackish. Coxae and trochanters blackish; base of femur with a broad brown spot; apex of femora, tibiae, tarsi and pre-tarsi yellowish. Wings Brown-hyaline.</p><p>Pilosity. Dense golden pubescence on anterior pronotum, mesepisternum, mesoscutum, scutellum, metanotum, and propodeum, denser at apex of the latter. Short and golden bristles less dense on head, legs and metasoma, being fine in the latter.</p><p>Sculpture. Clypeus micro-punctation evident, with sparse and shallow large punctures. Frons with sparse punctation; small and deep punctures. Dense punctation from vertex to occiput. Dorsal pronotum with dense punctation, punctures deep and abundant; punctures sparser and obsolete below humeral region. Mesepisternum with sparse and deep punctation. Mesoescutum, scutellum and metanotum with dense punctation, punctures deeper than those of pronotum. Propodeum with dense punctation and deep punctures dorsally, shallower and sparser laterally. Metasoma unpunctured.</p><p>Structure. Labrum rounded apically, retracted behind apex of clypeus. Clypeus longer than wide, slightly emarginate apically, almost truncate; short, rounded teeth, with apical carinae not evident; clypeal margins not lamellate. Inter-antennal region cariniform and raised, with basal groove; narrow, smaller than antennal socket. Pronotal carina developed throughout, sinuous and Z-shaped at humerous; humerous projecting; pronotal fovea rounded, nearly occluded by a fold of pronotal carina. Tegula not depressed medially; mesoepisternum with developed dorsal groove, punctured; conspicuous declivity between mesoscutum and scutellum; propodeum with medial projecting carina and evident striation; T1 without basal elevation, rounded preapical fossa; T2 longer than wide, without lamella.</p><p>Male. Sexual dimorphism as in most vespids. Antenna with hook-shaped and pointed apical flagellomere, surpassing antipenultimate.</p><p>Male genitalia. Apex of aedeagus rounded (Fig. 34), laterally curved (Fig. 33). Digitus with short bristles at apex and well-developed basal protuberances (Fig. 35).</p><p>Etymology. The name refers to the country where the first specimens were reported: Panama.</p><p>Type Material. Holotype ♀, Panama (MIUP): ‘TROCHA DEL ASERRADERO\ 990 m alt., near Cont. Div\ El Copé, Prov. Coclé\ PANAMA 2 SEPT \ J. COROWODO 1990’ (partially handwritten label) ‘ Pachymenes \ ghilianii \ olivaceus (Sauss)\ Ariel Rodriguez 1994’ (handwritten label). Paratypes: 1 ♀ (MIUP), ‘TROCHA DEL ASERRADERO\ 900 m alt., near Cont. Div\ El Copé Prov. Coclé\ PANAMA 9–10 OCT \ R. CONTRERDS 1990’ (partially handwritten label) ‘ Pachymenes \ ghilianii \ olivaceus (Sauss)\ Ariel Rodriguez 1994’ (handwritten label); 1 ♀ (MIUP), ‘El Copé, Coclé. Div.\ Cont. (900m) Rep. Panam-\ma 2 sept. 1990 \ col. Roberto Cambra T.’ (handwritten label) ‘ Pachymenes \ ghilianii \ olivaceus (Sauss)\ Ariel Rodriguez 1994’ (handwritten label); 1 ♀ (CEUFLA), ‘TROCHA DEL ASERRADERO\ 900 m alt. Near Cont. Div\ El Copé, Prov. Coclé\ PANAMA 2 SEPT. \ J. CORANODO 100’ (partially handwritten label); ‘ Pachymenes \ ghilianii \ olivaceus (Sauss)\ Ariel Rodriguez 1994’ (handwritten label); 1 ♀ (MIUP), ‘El Copé, Coclé\ Rep. Panamá\ 14 junio 1990 \ col. J. Coronado’ (handwritten label) ‘ Pachymenes \ ghilianii \ olivaceus (Sauss)\ Ariel Rodriguez 1994’ (handwritten label); 1 ♀ (MIUP), ‘Foutuna. Chiriouí\ Rep. Panama\ Nov. 88 \ R. Castillo’ (handwritten label) ‘ Pachymenes \ ghilianii \ olivaceus (Sauss)\ Ariel Rodriguez 1994’ (handwritten label); 1 m # (CEUFLA) ‘El Copé, Coclé, Rep. Panama\ 14 junio 1990 \ col. J. Conorado’ (handwritten label) ‘ Pachymenes \ ghilianii \ olivaceus (Sauss)\ Ariel Rodriguez 1994’ (handwritten label); 1 ♀ (CEUFLA), ‘PANAMA: Fortuna, 1050m \ Div. Cont. Chiriqui-\ B. Toro, 8–11 abr 1999 \ R. Cambra, A. Santos’; 1 f# (MIUP), ‘Camino a San Juan, 50 m \ Vert. Altantica, N. del\ Copé, Coclé, Rep. Panama\ 1 SEPT. 1990 \ col. D. Quintero A.’ (handwritten label) ‘ Pachymenes \ ghilianii \ olivaceus (Sauss)\ Ariel Rodriguez 1994’ (handwritten label); 1 m # (MIUP), ‘TROCHA DEL ASERRADERO\ 900 m alt. Near Cont. Div\ El Copé, Prov. Coclé\ PANAMA R. Cambra\ 27–28/XI 1992 ’.</p><p>Collecting Records. Panama.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/432B8793FFC1FFDCFF7681F4FDDEF83D	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Ferreira, Wellington D.;De Oliveira, Letícia A.;Hermes, Marcel G.	Ferreira, Wellington D., De Oliveira, Letícia A., Hermes, Marcel G. (2018): A revision of the Neotropical eumenine wasp genus Stenosigma Giordani Soika, 1978 (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Zootaxa 4455 (3): 499-512, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4455.3.6
432B8793FFCEFFD0FF768783FBF3FC71.text	432B8793FFCEFFD0FF768783FBF3FC71.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Stenosigma quechua Hermes & Ferreira 2016	<div><p>Stenosigma quechua Hermes &amp; Ferreira, 2016</p><p>(Figs. 6, 9, 32)</p><p>Stenosigma quechua Hermes &amp; Ferreira, 2016: 124 –126.</p><p>Type data: Holotype female (MSVE). Examined.</p><p>Type locality: Dos de Mayo, Peru.</p><p>Comments and Diagnosis. This species is closely related to S. humerale . Both are relatively large compared to other species of Stenosigma . In addition, they present the integument with sparser punctation, rarely with concentrated and abundant punctures. In the pronotum and mesepisternum the punctures are sparse and deep.</p><p>Two specimens of S. quechua were mistakenly included in the type series of S. humerale by Giordani Soika as paratypes. The mistake was detected by Hermes and Ferreira (2016), and the main differences between S. humerale and S. quechua were detailed by these authors (Hermes &amp; Ferreira, 2016, p. 125). Stenosigma humerale and S. quechua are easily distinguished by having the pre-apical fossa flattened and poorly developed in the former (Fig. 31), and slit-shaped in the latter (Fig. 32).</p><p>Type Material. Peru, Dos de Mayo to El Porvenir: holotype ♀ (MSNVE), ‘Dos de Mayo to\El Porvenir\Cam, del Pichis\PERU July6, 1920 ’ ‘414’ ‘ P. velutinus Duc \det. Beq. MCZ’ ‘not identical\with velutina Duke\which is prob. a\form of P. ghilianii \(pubesc. of propodeum?)\J. v. d. Vecht 5.1.79 ’ (handwritten label) ‘Paratypus\ Stenosigma \ umerale ’ (red label) ‘AGS’. Peru, Chanchamayo: paratype ♀ (NHM), ‘Peru\Chanchamayo\ 27.III.1949 \J.M.Schunke\B.M.1952-645’ ‘PARATYPUS\ Stenosigma \humerale’. Colombia, Narino: paratype ♂, ‘COLOMBIA: Narino,\Barbacoas\ 2-6.v.1976 \M.Cooper\B.M. 1976-290’.</p><p>Collecting Records. Peru ( Dos de Mayo, Chanchamayo) , Colombia (Narino) .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/432B8793FFCEFFD0FF768783FBF3FC71	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Ferreira, Wellington D.;De Oliveira, Letícia A.;Hermes, Marcel G.	Ferreira, Wellington D., De Oliveira, Letícia A., Hermes, Marcel G. (2018): A revision of the Neotropical eumenine wasp genus Stenosigma Giordani Soika, 1978 (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Zootaxa 4455 (3): 499-512, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4455.3.6
432B8793FFCEFFD1FF7684C2FB71FBEE.text	432B8793FFCEFFD1FF7684C2FB71FBEE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Stenosigma testaceum (Fox 1899)	<div><p>Stenosigma testaceum (Fox, 1899)</p><p>(Figs. 7, 14, 17, 24, 27)</p><p>Eumenes testaceus FOX, 1899: 438</p><p>Eumenes testaceus; ZaVattari, 1912: 83. BertOni, 1934: 114, 122. Carpenter &amp; Van der Vecht, 1991: 224 (designatiOn Of lectOtype).</p><p>Stenosigma testaceum; GiOrdani SOika, 1990: 148, 149. Hermes et al., 2014: 456, 482, 483, 484. Hermes &amp; Ferreira, 2016: 123.</p><p>Type data: Lectotype male (CMNH).</p><p>Examined.</p><p>Type locality: Santarém, Brazil.</p><p>Comments and Diagnosis. Stenosigma testaceum is morphologically similar to S. imitans, but clypeal features distinguish these two species. While specimens of S. imitans have a short clypeus without evident carinae (Fig. 10), specimens of S. testaceum present a longer clypeus with developed teeth with apical carinae (Fig. 14). In addition to the clypeus condition, S. testaceum is easily recognized by its predominantly yellowish body color (Fig. 7); presence of a developed lamella in the pronotal carina (Fig. 17); and the humeral region scarcely developed, without an evident projection (Fig. 24).</p><p>Type Material. Brasil, Santarém: lectotype ♂ (CMNH), ‘Santarem’ ‘ Eumenes \ testacea\ type Fox’ (handwritten label) ‘ LECTOTYPE ♂ \ Eumenes \ tescea Fox, 1889\ des. Carpenter &amp; Vecht’; paralectotype ♀ (CMNH), ‘Santarem’ ‘ Eumenes \ testacea\ Type Fox’ (handwritten label) ‘ PARALECTOTYPE ♀ \ Eumenes \ testacea Fox, 1899 \ des. Carpenter &amp; Vetch’; paralectotype ♂ (CMNH), ‘Santarem’ ‘ PARALECTOTYPE \ Eumenes \ testacea Fox, 1899 \ des. Carpenter &amp; Vetch’.</p><p>Additional material examined. Brasil, Amazonas: 1 ♀ (UNESP), ‘Brazil, AM, Manaus\ Reserva Ducke\ 2°58’46’’S/59°56’49’’W\ 09.vii.2013 —Coleta ativa\ Somavilla, A. col.’ ‘ Stenosigma ♀\ testaceum (Fox) \ Y. C. Grandinete det 2014’ ‘EUM 0515’; 1 ♂ (UNESP), ‘Brazil, AM, Manaus\ Reserva Ducke\ 2°58’46’’S/59°56’49’’W\ 09.vii.2013 —Coleta ativa\ Somavilla, A. col.’ ‘EUM 0438’; 1 ♂ (UNESP), ‘Brazil, AM, Manaus\ Reserva Ducke\ 2°58’46’’S/59°56’49’’W\ 09.vii.2013 —Coleta ativa\ Somavilla, A. col.’ ‘EUM 0439’. Brasil, Ceará: 1 ♀ (MPEG), ‘Ceará, Serra\ de Batureté\ 700m 18-7-08 \ Ducke’ (handwritten label) ‘Brazil\ Estado do\ Ceará’ ‘Coleção\ Ducke’ ‘ Stenosigma ♀’ (handwritten label) ‘Goeldi 0004’. Brasil, Pará: 1 ♀ (IBNPY), ‘...’ (unreadable label) ‘Brazil\ Estado do Pará’ ‘ Pachymenes ♀\ testaceum Fox \ det. Ducke 1912’ ‘MNHP\ A. W. Bertoni\ F. 179\ Garcete rev.’ ‘0061’ (back of the label) ‘Compared with\ Paratype’ ‘IBNPY-INVERT\ 000000007686’ ‘ Stenosigma \ testaceum \ det. B. Garcete 1997’; 1 ♀ (MPEG), ‘Obidos\ 1904’ ‘Brazil\ Estado do\ Pará’ ‘Coleção\ Ducke’ ‘MPEG HYM\ 11061782 ’ ‘Pirhosigma sp.’ (handwritten label) ‘Pirhosigma sp.’ (handwritten label) ‘Goeldi 0005’; 1 ♂ (MPEG), ‘Brazil\ Estado do\ Pará’ ‘R. Tapajós\ Itartuba\ 2.9.1902 \ Ducke’ ‘Coleção\ Ducke’ ‘ Stenosigma sp’ ‘Goeldi 0003’; 1 ♂ (MPEG), ‘Faro\ 19.2.1910 \ Ducke’ ‘Brazil\ Estado do\ Pará’ ‘Coleção\ Ducke’ ‘ Stenosigma sp.’ (handwritten label) ‘Goeldi 0002’. Brasil, Rondônia: 1 ♀ (UNESP), ‘Itapuã do Oeste-RO-\ Brasil\ Flor: Nac. do Jamari\ 29/ ix / 2012 \ Gomes, B. col.’ ‘ Stenosigma testaceum \ (Fox, 1899) ♀\ Y. C. Grandinete det. 2013’; 1 ♀ (UNESP), ‘Porto Velho-RP-\ Brasil\ Univ. Fed. De Rondônia\ 30/ xi/ 2012 \ Gomes, B. col.’ ‘ Stenosigma testaceum \ (Fox, 1899) ♀\ Y. C. Grandinete det. 2013’; 1 ♂ (UNESP), ‘Itapuã do Oeste-RO-Brasil\ Flor. Nac. do Jamari\ 28/x/2012 (Liq.\ atrativo)\ Stenosigma sp ♂’. Peru, Madre de Dios: 1 ♀ (AMNH), ‘PERU: Madre de Dios\ Tambopata Wild. Res.\ 12°51’S, 69°17’W, 290m.\ 22–25 January, 1985\ J. Carpenter &amp; D. Bowers’ ‘ Stenosigma aff ♀\ testaceum’ ‘AMNH 0016’. Suriname, Brownsberg: 1 ♀ (AMNH), ‘SURINAME: Brownsberg\ Natuurpark, Elev. 500m \ 4 58’, 55 11’\ 20 Feb. 1982 \ James M. Carpenter’ ‘ Stenosigma aff\ testaceum’ ‘AMNH 0018’. Peru, Madre de Dios: 1 ♂ (AMNH), ‘PERU: Madre de Dios\ Tambopata Wild. Res.\ 12°51’S, 69°17’W, 290m.\ 22–25 January, 1985\ J. Carpenter &amp; D. Bowers’ ‘ Stenosigma aff ♂\ testaceum’ ‘AMNH 0017’ (back of the label). Guiana, Tumatumari: 1 ♂ (AMNH), ‘Tumatumari\ Portaro R.\ BR. GUIANE\ Jun. 28.27’ (partially handwritten label). Brazil, Amazonas: 1 ♀ (INPA), ‘BRASIL, AM, Manaus,\ Reserva F. Adolpho Ducke\ 04–11.x.2010 \ Somavilla, A., et al. Leg. ’ ‘Grade do PPBio\ NS3 (LO7/LO8)\ Vespidae—Eumeninae ’ ‘ Stenosigma ♀\ testaceum (Fox) \ Grandinete, Y. C. det. 2014’ (handwritten label) ‘INPA 0015’. Brazil, Amazonas: 1 ♀ (INPA): ‘Brasil—AM\ PARNA do Jaú\ 10–24 Nov2003 ’ ‘M. L. Oliveira &amp;\ J. A. Cunha leg.\ Vila\ Seringalzinho’ ‘ Stenosigma \ testaceum (Fox) \ M. G. Hermes det. 2008’ (partially handwritten label) ‘INPA0016’. Brazil, Amazonas: 1 ♂ (INPA), ‘BRASIL, AM, Manaus,\ Reserva F. Adolpho Ducke\ 10–16.viii.2010 \ Somavilla, A., et al. Leg. ’ ‘Grade do PPBio\ NS2 (LO3/LO4)\ Vespidae—Eumeninae’ ‘ Stenosigma \ testaceum \ Somavilla, A. 2011 (det.)’ (partially handwritten label) ‘INPA0017’.</p><p>Collecting Records. Brazil (Pará, Amazonas, Ceará, Rondônia), Suriname, Guiana, Peru.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/432B8793FFCEFFD1FF7684C2FB71FBEE	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Ferreira, Wellington D.;De Oliveira, Letícia A.;Hermes, Marcel G.	Ferreira, Wellington D., De Oliveira, Letícia A., Hermes, Marcel G. (2018): A revision of the Neotropical eumenine wasp genus Stenosigma Giordani Soika, 1978 (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Zootaxa 4455 (3): 499-512, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4455.3.6
