taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
477287C0FFF4FFF0D738FF07FBD346CF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15520532/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15520532	Fig. 47–54. Prorocentrum bisaeptum, strain from Madeira, LM of living and formalin-fixed cells. Scale bars = 10 µm. Fig. 47. Cell in left lateral view. Note the anterior projections (arrowheads), the large pusule (p), the posterior nucleus (n) and the longitudinal flagellum. Fig. 48, 49. The same cell in lateral view of two different focal planes showing the anterior projections (arrowheads) and the nucleus (n) in 48. Note the two pyrenoids (py) in 49. Fig. 50. Cell in surface focus showing the thecal plate with pores. Fig. 51, 52. The same cell showing chloroplast details; (51) differential interference contrast, (52) epifluorescence showing the autofluorescence of the chloroplast. Note the two pyrenoids (py). Fig. 53, 54. The same fixed cell with DAPI-stained nucleus (n) visible (54).	Fig. 47–54. Prorocentrum bisaeptum, strain from Madeira, LM of living and formalin-fixed cells. Scale bars = 10 µm. Fig. 47. Cell in left lateral view. Note the anterior projections (arrowheads), the large pusule (p), the posterior nucleus (n) and the longitudinal flagellum. Fig. 48, 49. The same cell in lateral view of two different focal planes showing the anterior projections (arrowheads) and the nucleus (n) in 48. Note the two pyrenoids (py) in 49. Fig. 50. Cell in surface focus showing the thecal plate with pores. Fig. 51, 52. The same cell showing chloroplast details; (51) differential interference contrast, (52) epifluorescence showing the autofluorescence of the chloroplast. Note the two pyrenoids (py). Fig. 53, 54. The same fixed cell with DAPI-stained nucleus (n) visible (54).	2024-08-21	Tillmann, U.;Gottschling, M.;Sunesen, I.;Wietkamp, S.;Dzhembekova, N.;Rodriguez Hernández, F.;Tardivo Kubis, J.;Sar, E.;Kaufmann, M.;Hoppenrath, M.		Zenodo	biologists	Tillmann, U.;Gottschling, M.;Sunesen, I.;Wietkamp, S.;Dzhembekova, N.;Rodriguez Hernández, F.;Tardivo Kubis, J.;Sar, E.;Kaufmann, M.;Hoppenrath, M.			
477287C0FFF4FFF0D738FF07FBD346CF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15520540/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15520540	Fig. 55–66. Prorocentrum bisaeptum, strain from Madeira, LM of living cells enclosed in two nested, hyaline envelopes. Fig. 55. A cell at high magnification. Note the inner narrow envelope (arrows), the anterior projections (arrowheads) and the elongated elliptic cell outline. Scale bar = 10 µm. Fig. 56, 57. Two cells enclosed in the inner envelopes (white arrows), which are nesting in the outer, spherical envelope (black arrows). Figure 56. Bright field optics. Figure 57. Differential Interference Contrast microscopy. Scale bars = 10 µm (57), 25 µm (56). Fig. 58, 59. Three cells in the envelopes. Figure 58. Three individual cells in one envelope. Figure 59. One individual cell and a pair in a late division stage. Scale bars = 25 µm. Fig. 60. Four cells in the envelopes. Scale bar = 25 µm. Fig. 61. One cells in the inner of the two envelopes. Scale bar = 25 µm. Fig. 62–66. Different stages of cell division within the envelopes. Scale bars = 25 µm.	Fig. 55–66. Prorocentrum bisaeptum, strain from Madeira, LM of living cells enclosed in two nested, hyaline envelopes. Fig. 55. A cell at high magnification. Note the inner narrow envelope (arrows), the anterior projections (arrowheads) and the elongated elliptic cell outline. Scale bar = 10 µm. Fig. 56, 57. Two cells enclosed in the inner envelopes (white arrows), which are nesting in the outer, spherical envelope (black arrows). Figure 56. Bright field optics. Figure 57. Differential Interference Contrast microscopy. Scale bars = 10 µm (57), 25 µm (56). Fig. 58, 59. Three cells in the envelopes. Figure 58. Three individual cells in one envelope. Figure 59. One individual cell and a pair in a late division stage. Scale bars = 25 µm. Fig. 60. Four cells in the envelopes. Scale bar = 25 µm. Fig. 61. One cells in the inner of the two envelopes. Scale bar = 25 µm. Fig. 62–66. Different stages of cell division within the envelopes. Scale bars = 25 µm.	2024-08-21	Tillmann, U.;Gottschling, M.;Sunesen, I.;Wietkamp, S.;Dzhembekova, N.;Rodriguez Hernández, F.;Tardivo Kubis, J.;Sar, E.;Kaufmann, M.;Hoppenrath, M.		Zenodo	biologists	Tillmann, U.;Gottschling, M.;Sunesen, I.;Wietkamp, S.;Dzhembekova, N.;Rodriguez Hernández, F.;Tardivo Kubis, J.;Sar, E.;Kaufmann, M.;Hoppenrath, M.			
477287C0FFF4FFF0D738FF07FBD346CF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15537406/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15537406	Fig. 67–76. Prorocentrum bisaeptum, strain from Madeira, SEM of different cells. Scale bars = 10 µm. Fig. 67,68. Right lateral view. Fig. 69. Left lateral view. Note the narrow central area devoid of pores in 67–69. Fig. 70, 71. Separated thecal plates. Note the posterior pore cluster in 70. Fig. 72. Internal view of the (likely) left lateral plate still connected with the periflagellar area. Note the distinct growth bands, also of the tiny platelets, and the internal openings of the thecal pores. Fig. 73. Ventral right-lateral view. Fig. 74. Dorsal left-lateral view. Fig. 75. Dorsal view. Fig. 76. Dorsal right-lateral view. Note the faint depressions in the plate center.	Fig. 67–76. Prorocentrum bisaeptum, strain from Madeira, SEM of different cells. Scale bars = 10 µm. Fig. 67,68. Right lateral view. Fig. 69. Left lateral view. Note the narrow central area devoid of pores in 67–69. Fig. 70, 71. Separated thecal plates. Note the posterior pore cluster in 70. Fig. 72. Internal view of the (likely) left lateral plate still connected with the periflagellar area. Note the distinct growth bands, also of the tiny platelets, and the internal openings of the thecal pores. Fig. 73. Ventral right-lateral view. Fig. 74. Dorsal left-lateral view. Fig. 75. Dorsal view. Fig. 76. Dorsal right-lateral view. Note the faint depressions in the plate center.	2024-08-21	Tillmann, U.;Gottschling, M.;Sunesen, I.;Wietkamp, S.;Dzhembekova, N.;Rodriguez Hernández, F.;Tardivo Kubis, J.;Sar, E.;Kaufmann, M.;Hoppenrath, M.		Zenodo	biologists	Tillmann, U.;Gottschling, M.;Sunesen, I.;Wietkamp, S.;Dzhembekova, N.;Rodriguez Hernández, F.;Tardivo Kubis, J.;Sar, E.;Kaufmann, M.;Hoppenrath, M.			
477287C0FFF4FFF0D738FF07FBD346CF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15520542/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15520542	Fig. 77–81. Prorocentrum bisaeptum, strain from Madeira, SEM of the surface ornamentation and of thecal pores. Scale bars = 5 µm. Fig. 77, 78. External views of the thecal plate surface. Note the smooth surface, the presence of larger (white arrows) and smaller pores (black arrows). Small pores can have an oblique outlet port visible on the plate surface. In some cases, these ports had a V-shape. Fig. 79. Striated thecal plate growth bands next to the sagittal suture (white arrow). Fig. 80, 81. Internal views of thecal plates showing the internal structure of thecal pores in the thick thecal plates. Note that larger and smaller internal openings are distinguishable and the posterior pore cluster in 81.	Fig. 77–81. Prorocentrum bisaeptum, strain from Madeira, SEM of the surface ornamentation and of thecal pores. Scale bars = 5 µm. Fig. 77, 78. External views of the thecal plate surface. Note the smooth surface, the presence of larger (white arrows) and smaller pores (black arrows). Small pores can have an oblique outlet port visible on the plate surface. In some cases, these ports had a V-shape. Fig. 79. Striated thecal plate growth bands next to the sagittal suture (white arrow). Fig. 80, 81. Internal views of thecal plates showing the internal structure of thecal pores in the thick thecal plates. Note that larger and smaller internal openings are distinguishable and the posterior pore cluster in 81.	2024-08-21	Tillmann, U.;Gottschling, M.;Sunesen, I.;Wietkamp, S.;Dzhembekova, N.;Rodriguez Hernández, F.;Tardivo Kubis, J.;Sar, E.;Kaufmann, M.;Hoppenrath, M.		Zenodo	biologists	Tillmann, U.;Gottschling, M.;Sunesen, I.;Wietkamp, S.;Dzhembekova, N.;Rodriguez Hernández, F.;Tardivo Kubis, J.;Sar, E.;Kaufmann, M.;Hoppenrath, M.			
477287C0FFF4FFF0D738FF07FBD346CF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15520545/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15520545	Fig. 82–87. Prorocentrum bisaeptum, strain from Madeira, SEM of details of the periflagellar area. Numbers label the periflagellar platelets, fp = flagellar pore; ap = accessory pore. Scale bars = 1 µm. Fig. 82. Apical view of a separated periflagellar area. Fig. 83–85. Apical views. Fig. 86. Internal view of a separated periflagellar area. Note the clearly visible suture splitting platelet 8 into two parts, platelets 8a and 8b. Fig. 87. Right-lateral apical view.	Fig. 82–87. Prorocentrum bisaeptum, strain from Madeira, SEM of details of the periflagellar area. Numbers label the periflagellar platelets, fp = flagellar pore; ap = accessory pore. Scale bars = 1 µm. Fig. 82. Apical view of a separated periflagellar area. Fig. 83–85. Apical views. Fig. 86. Internal view of a separated periflagellar area. Note the clearly visible suture splitting platelet 8 into two parts, platelets 8a and 8b. Fig. 87. Right-lateral apical view.	2024-08-21	Tillmann, U.;Gottschling, M.;Sunesen, I.;Wietkamp, S.;Dzhembekova, N.;Rodriguez Hernández, F.;Tardivo Kubis, J.;Sar, E.;Kaufmann, M.;Hoppenrath, M.		Zenodo	biologists	Tillmann, U.;Gottschling, M.;Sunesen, I.;Wietkamp, S.;Dzhembekova, N.;Rodriguez Hernández, F.;Tardivo Kubis, J.;Sar, E.;Kaufmann, M.;Hoppenrath, M.			
477287C0FFF4FFF0D738FF07FBD346CF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15520547/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15520547	Fig. 88. Molecular phylogenetics of prorocentralean dinophytes (with the outgroup taxa Dinophysales and Gymnodiniales cropped), including all accessions assignable to P. bidens and P. bisaeptum. ML tree (–ln = 56,602.26), as inferred from an rRNA nucleotide alignment (1682 parsimony-informative sites) with strain number information. Accessions corresponding to type or at least reference material are indicated by bold type; freshwater accessions are shown in grey. Numbers on branches are ML bootstrap (above) and Bayesian support values (below). Asterisks indicate maximal support values; values <50% and <0.90 are not shown. Clades are indicated (abbreviations: ADE, Adenoides; Bid, P. bidens species group; cor, P. cordatum species group; ema, P. emarginatum species group; mic, P. micans species group; PLA, Plagiodinium; PRO, Prorocentrum; tri, P. triestinum species group; tsa, P. tsawwassenense species group).	Fig. 88. Molecular phylogenetics of prorocentralean dinophytes (with the outgroup taxa Dinophysales and Gymnodiniales cropped), including all accessions assignable to P. bidens and P. bisaeptum. ML tree (–ln = 56,602.26), as inferred from an rRNA nucleotide alignment (1682 parsimony-informative sites) with strain number information. Accessions corresponding to type or at least reference material are indicated by bold type; freshwater accessions are shown in grey. Numbers on branches are ML bootstrap (above) and Bayesian support values (below). Asterisks indicate maximal support values; values <50% and <0.90 are not shown. Clades are indicated (abbreviations: ADE, Adenoides; Bid, P. bidens species group; cor, P. cordatum species group; ema, P. emarginatum species group; mic, P. micans species group; PLA, Plagiodinium; PRO, Prorocentrum; tri, P. triestinum species group; tsa, P. tsawwassenense species group).	2024-08-21	Tillmann, U.;Gottschling, M.;Sunesen, I.;Wietkamp, S.;Dzhembekova, N.;Rodriguez Hernández, F.;Tardivo Kubis, J.;Sar, E.;Kaufmann, M.;Hoppenrath, M.		Zenodo	biologists	Tillmann, U.;Gottschling, M.;Sunesen, I.;Wietkamp, S.;Dzhembekova, N.;Rodriguez Hernández, F.;Tardivo Kubis, J.;Sar, E.;Kaufmann, M.;Hoppenrath, M.			
