taxonID	type	description	language	source
2008BB6F016EE8E0D5AEE16FD2F0778E.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Mandible without basal lobe ventrally. Labrum concealed. Occipital carina broadly absent dorsally, present or absent laterally. Propleuron ventral-laterally without oblique carina. Notauli deep, unsculptured or nearly so, well developed anteriorly, varying posteriorly from absent to deep and complete to midpit; midpit always present. Fore wing stigma short, broad, discrete posteriorly, r 1 arising at or distad its midpoint; second submarginal cell short; m-cu arising from second submarginal cell. Hind wing RS absent basally, sometimes present as a weakly pigmented crease distally; 2 M distinctly pigmented nearly to wing margin; m-cu present, well-developed. Dorsope absent. The species of Diachasmimorpha are most readily recognized by the pattern of fore and hind wing venation (Figs 9, 16) in combination with the concealed labrum (Fig. 12), unsculptured notauli (Figs 11, 14, 19, 20), and lack of oblique carina on the propleuron (Fig. 23). The species of Doryctobracon Enderlein, endemic to the New World, are similar but have the fore wing m-cu interstitial or arising from the first submarginal cell and the labrum is partially exposed. Fopius Wharton, an Old World genus with species that have been introduced to the New World, is also similar. The species of Fopius differ by the presence of completely sculptured notauli and the presence of an oblique carina on the propleuron (Fig. 24).	en	Wharton, Robert, Ward, Lauren, Miko, Istvan (2012): New neotropical species of Opiinae (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) reared from fruit-infesting and leaf-mining Tephritidae (Diptera) with comments on the Diachasmimorpha mexicana species group and the genera Lorenzopius and Tubiformopius. ZooKeys 243: 27-82, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990
CD28E218E8BB702E4BC5B486BBB8C9F4.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Holotype male. Eye in dorsal view as long as temple, temples neither receding nor expanded beyond eyes; eye in lateral view 1.3 x longer than temple. Frons irregularly rugulose along midline between antenna and median ocellus. Clypeus 2.8 x wider than high. Occipital carina distinct near base of mandible, short, not extending dorsally to ventral margin of eye. Antenna with 46 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.25 x longer than wide. Pronope deep, large, interrupting posterior crenulate groove middorsally. Notauli deep anteriorly, reaching anterior-lateral margin of mesoscutum and extending posteriorly about 0.5 x distance to deep, elongate midpit. Precoxal sulcus distinctly crenulate throughout, nearly extending to anterior margin of mesopleuron. Propodeum rugose, areola extending over posterior 0.6 but largely obscured by sculpture. Fore wing 2 RS 0.95 x length of 3 RSa; m-cu distinctly postfurcal. T 1 with dorsal carinae weakly converging, widely separated at posterior margin, gradually weakening posteriorly. Meso- and metasoma orange, tegula black, head dark brown to black except narrow yellow-orange band along epistomal sulcus extending to and through malar sulcus and small orange spot on vertex adjacent eye; legs black except extreme base of hind coxa irregularly orange, joint between femora and trochantelli reddish orange, mid and hind tarsi dark brown. Body length about 4.3 mm, fore wing length 4.5 mm, mesosoma length 1.8 mm. Specimens reared from Oedicarena latifrons (Wulp) vary as follows relative to the holotype: clypeus length / height ratio 2.6 - 2.8; eye / temple ratio, lateral view, 1.3 - 1.4 (males), 1.55 (female); antenna with 46 - 48 flagellomeres; 2 RS / 3 RS ratio 0.95 - 1.0; ovipositor sheath 2.5 times longer than the mesosoma; mesosoma length 1.85 - 1.9 mm (male), 2.0 mm (female); one male with T 1 dorsal carinae absent over posterior 0.5 and mandible, clypeus, face, and hind coxa more extensively orange; female with outer surface of hind coxa completely pale (dark medially), mandible, clypeus and lower part of face more extensively pale than in holotype. This species is slightly larger and has a smaller eye than both of the similarly-colored species described below, Diachasmimorpha martinalujai, sp. n. and Diachasmimorpha norrbomi, sp. n. Based on the single female reared from Diachasmimorpha latifrons, Diachasmimorpha hildagensis alsohas a much longer ovipositor than Diachasmimorpha norrbomi. The ovipositors of Diachasmimorpha hildagensis and Diachasmimorpha martinalujai are similar in length. In Diachasmimorpha hildagensis and Diachasmimorpha martinalujai, the notaulus consistently extends anteriorly to the margin of the mesoscutum whereas in Diachasmimorpha norrbomi, the notaulus usually does not. Color variation in the specimens reared from Opius latifrons is similar to that in the paratype series of Diachasmimorpha martinalujai and Diachasmimorpha norrbomi. Both Diachasmimorpha hildagensis and the two newly described speciesare similar in having the head mostly dark in contrast to the orange heads of Diachasmimorpha mexicana and Diachasmimorpha sanguinea, the other two members of this species group. The holotype of Diachasmimorpha hildagensis exhibits subsurface discoloration on the metasoma, but the tergites are all entirely orange.	en	Wharton, Robert, Ward, Lauren, Miko, Istvan (2012): New neotropical species of Opiinae (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) reared from fruit-infesting and leaf-mining Tephritidae (Diptera) with comments on the Diachasmimorpha mexicana species group and the genera Lorenzopius and Tubiformopius. ZooKeys 243: 27-82, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990
44F66210D3E59008E9DB8E3063CAA9BD.taxon	description	Description. Female. Head in dorsal view 1.30 x broader than mesoscutum, 1.65 x broader than face; eye in dorsal view 2.0 x longer than temple, temples not receding, but width at eyes greater than width at temples; eye in lateral view 2.05 x longer than temple. Discrete facial midridge ending dorsally as a distinct elevation at base of antennae, continuing between antennae onto frons as low, sharp, bifurcating ridges. Frons irregularly rugulose along midline between bifurcating arms, otherwise polished, with moderately dense patch of decumbent, laterally-directed, white setae on either side of midline; bare on either side of ocellar field; width of ocellar field 0.95 x distance from ocellar field to eye. Face 2.2 x wider than high; uniformly setose (as in Figs 31, 33), distinctly punctate, punctures separated by about 1 x their diameter or slightly less. Malar sulcus deep, complete; malar space about 1.1 x basal width of mandible, 0.35 x eye height. Clypeus 2.65 x wider than high; very weakly convex, nearly flat. Occipital carina weak, difficult to discern near base of mandible, short, extending dorsally to ventral margin of eye. Hypostomal carina extending as short but distinct flange below mandible. Antenna with 45 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.3 x longer than second; 1.8 x longer than wide. Mesosoma 1.4 x longer than high; 1.9 x longer than wide; 1.35 x higher than wide. Pronotum not visible dorsally; crenulae extending over dorsal 0.3 - 0.4 of prono tum laterally within narrow, shallow groove; groove not margined anteriorly by carina; anterior margin of pronotum laterally sinuate, not abruptly excavated. Notauli deep anteriorly, ending abruptly posteriorly, short, not quite extending posteriorly to level of anterior margin of tegula, not reaching long, narrow midpit, anterior end extending to anterior-lateral margin of scutum; mesoscutum without supra-marginal carina adjacent margin of mesoscutum between base of notaulus and tegula. Scuto-scutellar sulcus rectangular or nearly so; 4.75 x wider than midlength; crenulate-foveolate. Propodeum rugose, areola extending over posterior 0.8 but partially obscured by sculpture. Precoxal sulcus crenulate, distinctly separated from anterior margin of mesopleuron. Wings. Fore wing stigma short, broad, discrete distally, 3.5 x longer than wide; r 1 arising from midlength of stigma; 1 RS (excluding parastigma) 0.30 x length of 1 M; m-cu postfurcal by 0.25 x length of m-cu; second submarginal cell converging distally; 2 RS 0.9 x length of 3 RSa; 2 CUa about 1.7 x longer than 2 cu-a; 1 cu-a distad 1 M by about 1.0 x its length. Metasoma not distinctly petiolate; head 1.8 x wider than apex of T 1. T 1 1.05 x as long as apical width; strongly diverging apically, with apex 2.1 x wider than base; surface smooth; dorsal carinae parallel-sided, widely separated posteriorly, distinctly elevated over anterior 0.6, weaker and becoming indistinct posteriorly; lateral carina weaker than dorsal carina basally, extending distinctly ventrad spiracle, rounded and barely distinguishable posteriorad spiracle; spiracle at midlength of T 1; dorsope absent but lateral and dorsal carinae elevated at junction, giving appearance of a slight depression; laterope deep; S 1 very short. T 2 unsculptured, with sharp lateral margins. Ovipositor sheath 2.4 x longer than mesosoma, densely setose over apical half, with 4 - 5 irregular rows of setae, the setae longer than sheath width, more sparsely setose basally. Color (Fig. 26). Very similar to Diachasmimorpha hildagensis. Meso- and metasoma orange, except tegula black; head dorsally black except for small orange spot on vertex adjacent eye; lower gena and most of occiput yellow-orange; narrow bands dorsad epistomal sulcus, along ventral margin of clypeus and vertically through middle of mandible orange; legs black to dark reddish brown except basal 0.5 of hind coxa orange, joint between femora and trochantelli reddish orange. Male. Largely as in female with variation as follows: head in dorsal view 1.35 - 1.45 x broader than mesoscutum, 1.6 - 1.7 x broader than face; eye in dorsal view 1.6 - 1.85 x longer than temple, in lateral view 1.7 - 1.95 x longer than temple; face 1.95 - 2.1 x wider than high; malar space 0.3 - 0.45 x eye height; clypeus 2.6 - 2.8 x wider than high; antenna with 39 - 47 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.1 - 1.2 x longer than second, 2.0 - 2.1 x longer than wide; mesosoma 1.25 - 1.35 x longer than high; 1.85 - 1.95 x longer than wide; 1.4 - 1.5 x higher than wide; pronope deep, moderately large but not interrupting posterior crenulate groove middorsally; crenulae extending over dorsal 0.2 - 0.4 of pronotum laterally; scuto-scutellar sulcus 4.0 - 5.0 x wider than midlength; areola of propodeum variably obscured, short and triangular rather than pentagonal in topotypic paratype; precoxal sulcus occasionally extending to anterior margin of mesopleuron; fore wing stigma 3.3 - 3.8 x longer than wide; 1 RS 0.2 - 0.25 x length of 1 M; m-cu postfurcal by 0.15 - 2.0 x length of m-cu; 2 RS 0.8 - 1.05 x length of 3 RSa; head 1.85 - 2.2 x wider than apex of T 1; T 1 0.95 - 1.05 x as long as apical width, apex 2.1 - 2.25 x wider than base; surface of T 1 between dorsal carinae weakly rugulose; dorsal carinae weakly sinuate, weakly converging at posterior margin of T 1; S 1 extending posteriorly only to level of dorsal tendon attachment; head varying from darker as in female to more extensively pale (as in Fig. 31) with ventral 0.5 of face orange, outer surface of mandible entirely dark orange and clypeus reddish brown; hind coxa varying from almost entirely orange to almost entirely black; hind femur and tibia varying from black to reddish brown. Body length 4.9 mm (female), 3.1 - 4.7 mm (male), fore wing length 4.0 mm (female), 2.7 - 4.1 mm (male), mesosomal length 1.55 mm (female), 1.0 - 1.7 mm (male).	en	Wharton, Robert, Ward, Lauren, Miko, Istvan (2012): New neotropical species of Opiinae (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) reared from fruit-infesting and leaf-mining Tephritidae (Diptera) with comments on the Diachasmimorpha mexicana species group and the genera Lorenzopius and Tubiformopius. ZooKeys 243: 27-82, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990
44F66210D3E59008E9DB8E3063CAA9BD.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. This species is nearly identical to Diachasmimorpha hildagensis based on the similarly long ovipositor and the notaulus that consistently extends all the way to the anterior margin of the mesoscutum. The eye is distinctly larger in Diachasmimorpha martinalujai than in Diachasmimorpha hildagensis. Diachasmimorpha norrbomi is also similar, but has a shorter ovipositor and the notaulus only rarely extends anteriorly to the margin of the mesoscutum.	en	Wharton, Robert, Ward, Lauren, Miko, Istvan (2012): New neotropical species of Opiinae (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) reared from fruit-infesting and leaf-mining Tephritidae (Diptera) with comments on the Diachasmimorpha mexicana species group and the genera Lorenzopius and Tubiformopius. ZooKeys 243: 27-82, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990
44F66210D3E59008E9DB8E3063CAA9BD.taxon	etymology	Etymology. This species is named after Martin Aluja in recognition of his many contributions to tephritid biology, particularly in Mexico.	en	Wharton, Robert, Ward, Lauren, Miko, Istvan (2012): New neotropical species of Opiinae (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) reared from fruit-infesting and leaf-mining Tephritidae (Diptera) with comments on the Diachasmimorpha mexicana species group and the genera Lorenzopius and Tubiformopius. ZooKeys 243: 27-82, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990
271125A8DB952036DDC190416B8BF291.taxon	description	Description. Female. Head in dorsal view 1.25 - 1.30 x broader than mesoscutum, 1.80 - 1.85 x broader than face; eye in dorsal view 1.7 - 2.0 x longer than temple, temples not receding, but width at eyes greater than width at temples; eye in lateral view 2.1 - 2.9 x longer than temple. Facial midridge ending dorsally in short, very weak bifurcation between antennae. Frons irregularly rugulose along midline near bifurcation, otherwise polished, with moderately dense patch of decumbent, laterally-directed, white setae on either side of midline; bare on either side of ocellar field; width of ocellar field 1.0 - 1.2 x distance from ocellar field to eye. Face 1.80 - 1.95 x wider than high; uniformly setose (as in Figs 30, 32), distinctly punctate, punctures separated by at least 1 x their diameter. Malar sulcus deep, complete; malar space about 0.9 - 1.0 x basal width of mandible, 0.30 - 0.35 x eye height. Clypeus 2.8 - 3.2 x wider than high; very weakly convex, nearly flat. Occipital carina weak but distinct near base of mandible, short, extending dorsally to ventral margin of eye and often slightly beyond, not reaching mid eye height. Hypostomal carina extending as short but distinct flange below mandible. Antenna with 41 - 47 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.05 - 1.2 x longer than second; 1.8 - 2.0 x longer than wide. Mesosoma 1.35 - 1.45 x longer than high; 1.85 - 1.95 x longer than wide; 1.35 - 1.40 x higher than wide. Pronope deep, large, interrupting posterior crenulate groove middorsally; crenulae extending along dorsal 0.2 of pronotum laterally within narrow, shallow groove; groove not margined anteriorly by carina; anterior margin of pronotum laterally sinuate, not abruptly excavated. Notauli deep anteriorly, gradually weakening posteriorly, extending posteriorly to level of tegula, not reaching long, narrow midpit, anterior end usually just short of and only rarely reaching anterior-lateral margin of scutum; mesoscutum usually without supra-marginal carina between base of notaulus and tegula, rarely with short, weak trace of a carina. Scuto-scutellar sulcus nearly rectangular, a little narrower medially; 4.2 - 4.8 x wider than midlength; crenulate-foveolate. Propodeum rugose, areola extending over posterior 0.8 but largely obscured by sculpture. Precoxal sulcus crenulate, widely separated from anterior margin of mesopleuron. Wings. Fore wing stigma short, broad, discrete distally, 3.15 - 3.30 x longer than wide; r 1 arising from midlength of stigma; 1 RS (excluding parastigma) 0.30 - 0.35 x length of 1 M; m-cu postfurcal by 0.2 - 0.3 x length of m-cu; second submarginal cell distinctly converging distally; 2 RS 1.0 - 1.2 x longer than 3 RSa; 2 CUa 1.6 - 1.8 x longer than 2 cu-a; 1 cu-a distad 1 M by about 1.0 x its length. Metasoma not distinctly petiolate; head 1.6 - 1.9 x wider than apex of T 1. T 1 0.95 - 1.05 x as long as apical width; strongly diverging apically, with apex 2.0 - 2.5 x wider than base; surface smooth to weakly strigose posterior-medially, almost completed smooth laterally; dorsal carinae weakly converging, widely separated at posterior margin, strongly elevated over anterior 0.5, gradually weakening posteriorly; lateral carina weaker, extending distinctly ventrad spiracle, rounded and barely distinguishable posteriorad spiracle; spiracle at midlength of T 1; dorsope absent but lateral and dorsal carinae elevated at junction, giving appearance of a slight depression; laterope deep; S 1 very short, extending posteriorad to level of dorsal tendon attachment. T 2 unsculptured, with sharp lateral margins. Ovipositor sheath 1.7 - 1.8 x longer than mesosoma, setal pattern about as in Diachasmimorpha martinalujai, with slightly greater density basally. Color (Fig. 25). Very similar to Diachasmimorpha hildagensis. Meso- and metasoma orange, except tegula black; head dorsally dark brown to black except for small orange spot on vertex adjacent eye, lower occiput mostly yellow-orange, similar in color to broad band extending through epistomal sulcus, clypeus, lower gena (often), and mandibles; clypeus usually with narrow, transverse brown band, mandible with apical teeth dark, rarely with entire mandible brownish; legs black except extreme base and most or all of dorsal side of hind coxa orange, joint between femora and trochantelli reddish orange. Male as in female except head in dorsal view 1.3 - 1.4 x broader than mesoscutum, 1.70 - 1.75 x broader than face; eye slightly smaller, in dorsal view eye 1.45 - 1.60 x longer than temple, in lateral view 1.9 - 2.4 x longer than temple; antenna with 41 - 43 flagellomeres, first flagellomere 0.95 - 1.2 x longer than second. Mesosoma slightly narrower, 1.95 - 2.05 x longer than wide; 1.4 - 1.5 x higher than wide; scuto-scutellar sulcus somewhat more variable in size, 4.0 - 5.5 x wider than midlength. Fore wing stigma 3.1 - 3.4 x longer than wide. T 1 slightly smaller, head 1.9 - 2.2 x wider than apex of T 1, T 1 1.75 - 1.90 x wider at apex than at base. Body length 3.3 - 4.3 mm, fore wing length 3.5 - 4.1 mm, mesosoma length 1.15 - 1.65 mm.	en	Wharton, Robert, Ward, Lauren, Miko, Istvan (2012): New neotropical species of Opiinae (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) reared from fruit-infesting and leaf-mining Tephritidae (Diptera) with comments on the Diachasmimorpha mexicana species group and the genera Lorenzopius and Tubiformopius. ZooKeys 243: 27-82, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990
271125A8DB952036DDC190416B8BF291.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. This species is similar in coloration to Diachasmimorpha hildagensis and Diachasmimorpha martinalujai but the ovipositor (with sheath 1.7 - 1.8 x longer than mesosoma) is slightly but distinctly shorter and the notaulus only rarely extends all the way to the anterior margin. The notaulus always reaches the anterior margin in the other two species. Diachasmimorpha norrbomi is smaller and has a larger eye than Diachasmimorpha hildagensis, and 2 RS tends to be longer (relative to 3 Ra) in Diachasmimorpha norrbomi than in Diachasmimorpha hildagensis and Diachasmimorpha martinalujai.	en	Wharton, Robert, Ward, Lauren, Miko, Istvan (2012): New neotropical species of Opiinae (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) reared from fruit-infesting and leaf-mining Tephritidae (Diptera) with comments on the Diachasmimorpha mexicana species group and the genera Lorenzopius and Tubiformopius. ZooKeys 243: 27-82, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990
271125A8DB952036DDC190416B8BF291.taxon	etymology	Etymology. This species is named for Allen Norrbom, who reared many Opiinae from various fruit, stem, and flower-infesting tephritids in Mexico and Central America.	en	Wharton, Robert, Ward, Lauren, Miko, Istvan (2012): New neotropical species of Opiinae (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) reared from fruit-infesting and leaf-mining Tephritidae (Diptera) with comments on the Diachasmimorpha mexicana species group and the genera Lorenzopius and Tubiformopius. ZooKeys 243: 27-82, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990
63DA601C3FB569B691B302D196E39DAE.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Holotype male. Eye in dorsal view shorter than temple, temples weakly expanded beyond eyes; eye in lateral view 0.95 x length of temple. Frons unsculptured along midline between antenna and median ocellus. Clypeus 3.4 x wider than high. Occipital carina distinct near base of mandible, short, not extending dorsally to ventral margin of eye. Antenna broken. Pronope deep, large, interrupting posterior crenulate groove middorsally. Notauli deep anteriorly, reaching margin of mesoscutum anteriorly, apparently extending about half distance from anterior-lateral margin to elongate midpit but pin obliterates midpit and surrounding area of mesonotum. Precoxal sulcus very weakly crenulate, nearly smooth, short, not extending close to anterior margin of mesopleuron. Propodeum largely smooth, with rugulose sculpture largely confined to midline, especially around apex, and along border of metapleuron. Fore wing 2 RS 0.8 x 3 RSa; m-cu distinctly postfurcal. T 1 with dorsal carinae widely separated, short, barely extending to level of spiracle, T 1 otherwise unsculptured. Head, meso- and metasoma orange, tegula black; legs black as in holotype of Diachasmimorpha hildagensis. Body length about 4.0 mm. This species has a much smaller eye (Figs 35, 37) than the similarly-colored Diachasmimorpha sanguinea (Fig. 41) and is also less heavily sculptured. Females are unknown.	en	Wharton, Robert, Ward, Lauren, Miko, Istvan (2012): New neotropical species of Opiinae (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) reared from fruit-infesting and leaf-mining Tephritidae (Diptera) with comments on the Diachasmimorpha mexicana species group and the genera Lorenzopius and Tubiformopius. ZooKeys 243: 27-82, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990
B1CF898F8A30051044C0AE592BF52332.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Male. Eye in dorsal view 1.1 - 1.3 x longer than temple, temples not expanded beyond eyes; eye in lateral view 1.3 - 1.5 x longer than temple. Frons between short, low, bifurcating ridges varying from unsculptured to irregularly strigose, frons otherwise smooth, polished. Clypeus 2.5 - 2.8 x wider than high. Occipital carina distinct near base of mandible, short, not extending dorsally to ventral margin of eye. Antenna with 38 - 48 flagellomeres. Pronope deep, large, interrupting posterior crenulate groove middorsally. Notauli deep anteriorly, reaching margin of mesoscutum anteriorly, extending about half distance from anterior-lateral margin to elongate midpit. Precoxal sulcus heavily sculptured, crenulate to foveolate, usually extending to or nearly to anterior margin of mesopleuron. Propodeum rugose, areola, when partially visible, extending over posterior 0.6 - 0.7 but frequently completely obscured by sculpture. Fore wing 2 RS 0.9 - 1.05 x length of 3 RSa; m-cu distinctly postfurcal. T 1 with dorsal carinae weakly converging, widely separated at posterior margin, gradually weakening posteriorly, T 1 smooth to strigose between carinae. Head, meso- and metasoma orange; tegula orange to brown, legs varying from black except hind coxa mottled black and orange to more extensively orange. Female about as in male except eye in lateral view 1.2 - 1.6 x longer than temple. Ovipositor sheath 1.6 - 1.75 x longer than mesosoma. Body length 3.6 - 5.3 mm, fore wing length 3.3 - 4.6 mm, mesosoma length 1.2 - 1.9 mm. This species has a larger eye than the similarly-colored Diachasmimorpha mexicana and is generally more heavily sculptured.	en	Wharton, Robert, Ward, Lauren, Miko, Istvan (2012): New neotropical species of Opiinae (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) reared from fruit-infesting and leaf-mining Tephritidae (Diptera) with comments on the Diachasmimorpha mexicana species group and the genera Lorenzopius and Tubiformopius. ZooKeys 243: 27-82, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990
A7DEF18AC75EC02842D147B81E94E179.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Mandible without basal lobe ventrally. Labrum broadly exposed. Occipital carina broadly absent dorsally, present laterally. Propleuron ventral-laterally without oblique carina. Notauli deep, well developed anteriorly, varying posteriorly from largely absent to deep and extending to scuto-scutellar sulcus or nearly so; midpit present. Fore wing stigma long, narrow, parallel-sided, discrete posteriorly, r 1 arising distinctly basad its midpoint; second submarginal cell with 2 RS shorter than 3 RSb; 2 CUb arising above middle of hind margin of first subdiscal cell. Dorsope present; S 1 0.2 - 0.3 x length of T 1, never fused to T 1.	en	Wharton, Robert, Ward, Lauren, Miko, Istvan (2012): New neotropical species of Opiinae (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) reared from fruit-infesting and leaf-mining Tephritidae (Diptera) with comments on the Diachasmimorpha mexicana species group and the genera Lorenzopius and Tubiformopius. ZooKeys 243: 27-82, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990
C615C95D28167C72B822E78C4A88F890.taxon	description	Description. Female. Head in dorsal view 1.25 - 1.30 x broader than mesoscutum, 1.80 - 1.95 x broader than face; eye in dorsal view 2.5 - 3.2 x longer than temple, temples distinctly receding behind eyes. Frons and vertex highly polished, unsculptured except for shallow, median depression between toruli; frons bare, vertex and occiput with a few, short, scattered setae; width of ocellar field 1.05 - 1.3 x distance from ocellar field to eye. Face 1.55 - 1.70 x wider than high; slightly less polished than frons; uniformly setose (as in Figs 50, 52), with very fine punctures, these separated by at least 2 x their diameter. Frons and face delimited by slight change in sculpture resulting in weak, shallow sulcus between torulus and eye; distance between antennal toruli equal to distance from torulus to eye, eye not distinctly emarginate in region of antenna. Malar sulcus deep, complete; malar space about 0.5 x basal width of mandible, 0.2 x eye height. Face weakly convex, bulging slightly medially along the low midridge. Epistomal sulcus weak mid-dorsally, more distinct laterally. Clypeus 2.2 - 2.5 x wider than high; weakly convex, slightly protruding in profile; ventral margin sharp, truncate to very weakly concave in frontal view. Labrum broadly exposed, gap between ventral margin of clypeus and dorsal margin of mandible varying from 0.5 - 1.0 x height of clypeus, depending on how tightly closed the mandibles are. Occipital carina distinctly curved medially at dorsal end, broadly absent mid-dorsally, the space where the carina is absent distinctly wider than width of ocellar field; occipital and hypostomal carinae widely separated at base of mandible, the latter extending as a flange beneath about basal 0.2 of mandible. Mandible without basal lobe ventrally; bidentate apically, lower tooth much smaller than dorsal tooth and slightly twisted beneath dorsal tooth; ventral margin carinate throughout. Antenna 1.35 - 1.45 xlonger than fore wing, with 39 - 43 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.1 - 1.3 x longer than second, 1.2 - 1.3 x longer than third; flagellomeres 2.3 - 2.7 x longer than wide basally, twice longer than wide apically. Maxillary palps a little longer than head height; fifth and sixth segments equal in length or nearly so, fourth segment 1.1 - 1.15 x longer than both fifth and sixth. Mesosoma 1.4 x longer than high; 1.9 x longer than wide; 1.35 - 1.40 x higher than wide. Pronotum dorsally a narrow, polished, smooth band with crenulate groove along posterior margin; rarely with discernible, slightly enlarged pit in middle of crenulate groove; crenulae extending in narrow, shallow groove onto pronotum laterally, but only covering dorsal 0.2 - 0.4; groove margined anteriorly by sharp carina that continues ventrally along full length of pronotum. Anterior declivity of mesoscutum completely vertical, bare or nearly so; anterior-lateral corners of mesoscutum at upper edge of declivity elevated, rounded, sparsely setose; notauli extending 0.4 x distance from anterior declivity to scuto-scutellar sulcus, extending posteriorly from lateral side of elevated anterior-lateral corners, not extending to mesoscutal margin anteriorly, very weakly converging posteriorly; narrow, crenulate throughout; mesoscutum with distinct supra-marginal carina extending from elevated anterior-lateral corner to tegula. Lateral and median mesoscutal lobes bare except scattered setae along notauli; midpit deep, round to somewhat elongate, never extending to notauli. Scuto-scutellar sulcus nearly rectangular, a little narrower medially; 3.75 - 4.25 x wider than midlength; crenulate-foveolate, with 7 ridges; all sides vertical, clearly delineated. Scutellum very weakly convex, nearly flat, not strongly elevated; bare except for scattered setae posteriorly; unsculptured, even along posterior margin. Propodeum with median carina over anterior 0.3, bifurcating at this point to form an inverted v-shaped transverse carina extending to pleural carina just posteriad spiracle; pleural carina complete from base to apex though sometimes partly obscured by sculpture posteriad spiracle; lateral longitudinal carina parallel to and narrowly separated from pleural carina anteriad spiracle, more medially displaced when visible posteriad transverse carinae, forming part of broad areola; area between pleural and lateral longitudinal carinae rugose and sparsely setose anteriorly; lateral propodeal areas anteriorly on either side of median carina smooth, bare, unsculptured; areola broad, varying from distinct (with surface irregularly, weakly rugulose) to indistinct (surface rugose, disrupting carinate margin of areola); lateral propodeal areas posteriorly varying from nearly unsculptured and distinct to rugose and indistinct; propodeum largely bare medially, with a few scattered setae. Mesopleuron largely bare, with sparse setae in unsculptured subalar region and a small patch of setae dorsad mid coxa; posterior margin unsculptured. Precoxal sulcus weakly impressed but distinct; unsculptured. Metapleuron bare on dorsal half except for small patch below wing, with a few long setae medially, and patches of setae among rugulose sculpture along ventral margin and in groove on ventral half of anterior margin; otherwise unsculptured. Wings. Fore wing stigma parallel-sided, discrete posteriorly, 7.50 - 7.75 x longer than wide; r 1 arising from basal 0.35; 1 RS (excluding parastigma) 0.20 - 0.25 x length of 1 M; RS + M straight or nearly so; m-cu postfurcal, extending into basal corner of second submarginal cell; second submarginal cell weakly converging distally; 3 RSa 1.10 - 1.25 x longer than 2 RS; 2 RS 2.5 - 3.4 x longer than r, the two not forming a continuous line; 2 RS with distinct median bend; 3 RSb very weakly bowed, nearly straight; 3 M variable, but often pigmented and sclerotized for most of its length; 2 CUa 0.5 - 0.7 x length of 2 cu-a, 2 CUb arising well above middle of first subdiscal cell; 1 cu-a distad 1 M by about 1.0 x its length; 1 - 1 A bowed toward wing margin, and separated therefrom by its width. Hind wing RS a weak but distinct, unpigmented crease, extending nearly to wing margin in most specimens; 2 M extending to wing margin as a more deeply impressed line, very weakly pigmented for much of its length; m-cu usually a deeply impressed, curved line extending about half distance to wing margin. Metasoma distinctly petiolate; head 3.5 - 3.8 x wider than apex of T 1. T 1 2.15 - 2.35 x longer than apical width; nearly parallel-sided, with apex 1.20 - 1.35 x wider than base; surface striate throughout, above and below lateral carina; one or two very shallow, subapical depressions usually present dorsally; dorsope distinct, deep; laterope completely absent; dorsal carina present only at base, lateral carina usually distinct throughout; spiracle positioned 0.6 x length of T 1 from the base; S 1 extending about 0.25 - 0.30 x length of T 1; dorsal surface of petiole in profile evenly convex from base to apex. T 2 and following without sharp lateral margins; spiracle of second metasomal tergum laterally displaced, not visible in dorsal view. Ovipositor as long as mesosoma; ovipositor sheath 0.6 - 0.7 x length of mesosoma, with 2 - 3 irregular rows of long setae along its length. Color: head, including antenna, mesosoma, petiole and ovipositor sheath dark brown except scape yellow; mandible, lower gena, ventral portion of clypeus, pedicel (oc casionally), face adjacent antennal base, propleuron, anterior margin of pronotum, spot on mesopleuron below wing and a smaller spot above mid coxa, two streaks on either side of midpit on mesoscutum, posterior margins of scutellum and metapleuron, and petiole laterally (occasionally) dark yellow to orange; palps pale yellow, nearly white. Legs and metasoma beyond T 1 yellow except hind tibia, hind tarsi, lateral margin of metasomal terga 2 + 3 and often anterior half of terga 4 - 6 brown, the hind tibia often paler medially. Male. As in female except antenna with 41 - 45 flagellomeres, head 4.0 - 4.6 x wider than apex of T 1 and T 1 2.5 - 2.9 x longer than apical width. Body somewhat darker in color, with metasomal terga 6, 7, and most or all of 5 dark brown. Body length 3.2 - 4.3 mm; wing length 3.5 - 4.2 mm.	en	Wharton, Robert, Ward, Lauren, Miko, Istvan (2012): New neotropical species of Opiinae (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) reared from fruit-infesting and leaf-mining Tephritidae (Diptera) with comments on the Diachasmimorpha mexicana species group and the genera Lorenzopius and Tubiformopius. ZooKeys 243: 27-82, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990
C615C95D28167C72B822E78C4A88F890.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. This species runs to Opius (Nosopoea) in Fischer (1972, 1977) on the basis of the exposed labrum, distinct midpit on the mesoscutum, and absence of sculpture within the precoxal sulcus. It differs from described species placed in the subgenus Nosopoea by the combination of larger size, more numerous flagellomeres, relatively well-developed notauli (Fig. 44), parallel-sided T 1 (Fig. 56), and parallel-sided stigma (Fig. 64), all characters which it shares with the type species of Stigmatopoea, Eurytenes (Stigmatopoea) macrocerus. In Eurytenes maya the anterior declivity of the mesoscutum is more vertical and the anterior-lateral corners of the mesoscutal disc are distinctly elevated (Fig. 44) in comparison to Eurytenes macrocerus. Eurytenes maya differs from the other species described below, Eurytenes norrbomi, sp. n., by the possession of a relatively longer ovipositor (Fig. 42 vs. Fig. 45) and a less densely setose mesoscutum (Fig. 44 vs. 43).	en	Wharton, Robert, Ward, Lauren, Miko, Istvan (2012): New neotropical species of Opiinae (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) reared from fruit-infesting and leaf-mining Tephritidae (Diptera) with comments on the Diachasmimorpha mexicana species group and the genera Lorenzopius and Tubiformopius. ZooKeys 243: 27-82, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990
C615C95D28167C72B822E78C4A88F890.taxon	etymology	Etymology. The species name is in reference the Mayan Indians of this region.	en	Wharton, Robert, Ward, Lauren, Miko, Istvan (2012): New neotropical species of Opiinae (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) reared from fruit-infesting and leaf-mining Tephritidae (Diptera) with comments on the Diachasmimorpha mexicana species group and the genera Lorenzopius and Tubiformopius. ZooKeys 243: 27-82, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990
5EB0C5BEFE3C8419163DBA19E77C9DC0.taxon	description	Description. Female. Head in dorsal view 1.2 - 1.3 x broader than mesoscutum, 1.75 - 1.85 x broader than face; eye in dorsal view 1.2 - 1.5 x longer than temple, temples weakly receding behind eyes. Frons and vertex as in Eurytenes maya except vertex and outer part of occiput densely covered with long, decumbent setae; width of ocellar field 1.20 - 1.35 x distance from ocellar field to eye. Face 1.75 - 1.85 x wider than high; slightly less polished than frons; uniformly setose (as in Figs 51, 53), distinctly punctate, the punctures separated by about 1 x their diameter. Frons and face delimited by a slightly more distinct change in sculpture in area between torulus and eye. Malar space about 0.6 x basal width of mandible, 0.25 x eye height. Clypeus 3.0 - 3.4 x wider than high; protruding in profile. Occipital carina distinctly curved medially at dorsal end, absent mid-dorsally, the space where the carina is absent approximating width of ocellar field. Antenna 1.15 - 1.30 xlonger than fore wing, with 31 - 33 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.05 - 1.10 x longer than second, 1.05 - 1.20 x longer than third; flagellomeres 3.1 - 4.1 x longer than wide basally, 2.3 - 2.7 longer than wide apically. Head otherwise as described for Eurytenes maya. Mesosoma 1.35 - 1.45 x longer than high; 1.8 - 1.9 x longer than wide; 1.3 - 1.4 x higher than wide. Pronotum dorsally as in Eurytenes maya but with slightly enlarged pit in middle of crenulate groove consistently present; crenulae extending in shallow groove onto pronotum laterally, covering dorsal 0.2 - 0.6; groove margined anteriorly as in Eurytenes maya. Anterior declivity of mesoscutum completely vertical, densely covered with white, decumbent setae except for bare median band extending posteriorly to midpit; anterior-lateral corners of mesoscutum at upper edge of declivity elevated, rounded, densely setose, the setal pattern extending in broad bands all along notauli and laterally from anterior declivity to tegula; notauli complete, extending from anterior margin to scuto-scutellar sulcus, weakly converging posteriorly alongside but not into tear-drop shaped midpit; crenulate throughout, with sculpture extending laterally around margin to tegula, sculpture largely obscured by dense setae; lateral lobes of mesoscutum bare posterior-medially. Scuto-scutellar sulcus 4 - 5 x wider than midlength, lateral margins difficult to discern due to setal density; with low midridge and indistinct crenulae on either side; otherwise as in Eurytenes maya. Scutellum as in Eurytenes maya except with long marginal setae extending medially to cover most of posterior 0.5. Propodeum extensively rugulose, obscuring nearly all traces of carinae; pleural carina weak, often indistinct, very short median carina often present basally; transverse carina rarely weakly indicated across middle; propodeum uniformly setose anteriorly, with a few scattered setae posteriorly. Mesopleuron as in Eurytenes maya except subalar region densely setose and groove below subalar ridge varying from nearly smooth to weakly rugulose. Precoxal sulcus distinctly impressed, unsculptured. Metapleuron a little more extensively setose but otherwise as in Eurytenes maya. Wings. Fore wing stigma parallel-sided, discrete posteriorly, 6.3 - 6.6 x longer than wide; r 1 arising from basal 0.35; 1 RS (excluding parastigma) 0.25 - 0.35 x length of 1 M; RS + M weakly sinuate; 3 RSa 1.05 - 1.30 x longer than 2 RS; 2 RS 2.6 - 3.1 x longer than r; 2 RS and 3 RSb straight; 3 M variable, but often pigmented and sclerotized for most of its length; 2 CUa 0.8 - 0.9 x length of 2 cu-a, 2 CUb arising slightly above middle of first subdiscal cell; position of m-cu, 1 cu-a, and 1 - 1 A, shape of second submarginal cell, and angle between r 1 and 2 RS as in Eurytenes maya. Hind wing as in Eurytenes maya. Metasoma distinctly petiolate; head 3.75 - 4.10 x wider than apex of T 1. T 1 2.2 - 2.5 x longer than apical width; nearly parallel-sided, with apex 1.20 - 1.35 x wider than base; surface granular coriaceous throughout; completely without subapical depre ssions dorsally; dorsope, laterope, dorsal carinae, dorsal surface of T 1 in profile, as in Eurytenes maya; lateral carina at least partially present but difficult to distinguish from surrounding sculpture. S 1 extending about 0.25 - 0.30 x length of T 1; T 2 and following without sharp lateral margins; spiracle of second metasomal terga laterally displaced, only partially visible in dorsal view. Ovipositor shorter than mesosoma, base not visible in type series, but total length approximately 0.6 - 0.7 x length of mesosoma; ovipositor sheath 0.30 - 0.35 x length of mesosoma, with setal pattern as in Eurytenes maya. Color: Mesosoma, T 1, S 1, ovipositor sheath, and most of head dark brown to black; antenna yellow basally, apical 0.3 brown; mandibles yellow; palps white; lower gena adjacent malar sulcus brown to brownish red; ventral 0.3 - 0.4 of clypeus yellow to brownish red. Tegula reddish brown with yellow margin. Legs yellow to pale yellow except most of hind coxa, apical 0.6 - 0.7 of hind femur, and fifth tarsomere of all legs brown; hind tibia varying from weakly infumate to light brown, basal 0.2 nearly always pale yellow. T 2 mostly brownish red with median yellow blotch posteriorly; T 3 yellow with anterior and lateral margins brownish red; T 4 - T 6 yellow with anterior and lateral margins dark brown; visible parts of remaining terga yellow. Male. As in female except antenna with 37 flagellomeres; eye in dorsal view 1.55 - 1.75 x longer than temple; width of ocellar field 1.05 - 1.10 x distance from ocellar field to eye. Color same except visible parts of apical terga dark brown. Body length 2.8 - 3.5 mm; wing length 3.2 - 3.6 mm.	en	Wharton, Robert, Ward, Lauren, Miko, Istvan (2012): New neotropical species of Opiinae (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) reared from fruit-infesting and leaf-mining Tephritidae (Diptera) with comments on the Diachasmimorpha mexicana species group and the genera Lorenzopius and Tubiformopius. ZooKeys 243: 27-82, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990
5EB0C5BEFE3C8419163DBA19E77C9DC0.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. This species shares with Eurytenes maya and Eurytenes macrocerus the diagnostic features noted above for Stigmatopoea. Eurytenes norrbomi is most readily differentiated from Eurytenes maya on the basis of the more densely setose head and body (Figs 43, 47, 49), particularly the vertex, occiput, and mesoscutum, and the more extensively rugose propodeum. It also has a shorter ovipositor than Eurytenes maya (Fig. 45 vs. Fig. 42). The setal pattern on the mesoscutum also differentiates Eurytenes norrbomi from Eurytenes macrocerus. The latter has shorter setae that are more sparsely distributed laterally (Fig. 54).	en	Wharton, Robert, Ward, Lauren, Miko, Istvan (2012): New neotropical species of Opiinae (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) reared from fruit-infesting and leaf-mining Tephritidae (Diptera) with comments on the Diachasmimorpha mexicana species group and the genera Lorenzopius and Tubiformopius. ZooKeys 243: 27-82, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990
5EB0C5BEFE3C8419163DBA19E77C9DC0.taxon	etymology	Etymology. This species is named after the collector, Allen Norrbom, who has provided many valuable host records for tephritid parasitoids.	en	Wharton, Robert, Ward, Lauren, Miko, Istvan (2012): New neotropical species of Opiinae (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) reared from fruit-infesting and leaf-mining Tephritidae (Diptera) with comments on the Diachasmimorpha mexicana species group and the genera Lorenzopius and Tubiformopius. ZooKeys 243: 27-82, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990
2E19B0BD9B6892E44627B2E114B32425.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Mandible distinctly narrowed from base to apex, without basal lobe ventrally. Labrum exposed. Clypeus relatively flat, not distinctly protruding in profile; ventral margin sharp, truncate to weakly concave. Malar sulcus a sharp, weakly curved groove. Occipital carina broadly absent dorsally, present laterally; widely separated from hypostomal carina ventrally. First flagellomere longer than second. Propleuron ventral-laterally without oblique carina; pronotum dorsally without pronope or otherwise enlarged pit, posterior margin transversely rugulose. Notauli deep, narrow, well developed anteriorly, usually extending onto disc posteriorly; midpit present. Precoxal sulcus distinctly impressed. Propodeum with large areola, posterior portion often obscured by rugose sculpture. Fore wing stigma long, narrow, parallel-sided, discrete posteriorly, r 1 arising distinctly basad its midpoint but not from extreme base; m-cu entering base of second submarginal cell; second submarginal cell with 2 RS shorter than 3 RSb; 2 CUb arising above middle of hind margin of first subdiscal cell. Dorsope and laterope of T 1 absent; S 1 at least 0.7 x length of T 1 in females, slightly shorter in males, apparently fused to T 1; T 1 long and narrow throughout; T 2 and following terga unsculptured. Ovipositor tapering evenly to a fine point, without dorsal nodes or ridges.	en	Wharton, Robert, Ward, Lauren, Miko, Istvan (2012): New neotropical species of Opiinae (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) reared from fruit-infesting and leaf-mining Tephritidae (Diptera) with comments on the Diachasmimorpha mexicana species group and the genera Lorenzopius and Tubiformopius. ZooKeys 243: 27-82, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990
AC7C2B3CE2D3DC6C38CDC4B7AB95F073.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Holotype male. Head in dorsal view with temples neither receding nor expanded beyond eyes; in lateral view, eye about 1.6 x longer than temple. Labrum partly exposed between clypeus and mandibles (Fig. 70); clypeus about twice as wide as tall, flat or nearly so, not distinctly protruding in profile, ventral margin truncate to very weakly concave. Mandible without basal lobe. Malar space well developed, longer than basal width of mandible; malar sulcus deeply impressed. Antenna with 27 flagellomeres. Pronotum dorsally not visible in holotype. Disc of mesoscutum nearly bare, with scattered setae along margin of anterior declivity and a single pair of setae arising about midlength of notauli; notaulus extending posteriorly along anterior 0.3 of disc, less than half distance to small, deep, round midpit; supra-marginal carina distinct anteriorly, not extending to level of tegula. Scuto-scutellar sulcus relatively narrow (Fig. 71), densely crenulate throughout. Precoxal sulcus distinctly impressed, long, narrow, completely unsculptured. Propodeum largely smooth with broad, pentagonal areola on posterior 0.65, anterior 0.35 with median carina. Fore wing stigma long, narrow, with some postmortem curling, but at least 4.5 x longer than width at r 1; r 1 arising from basal 0.3; second submarginal cell long, weakly converging distally, 3 RSa 1.7 x longer than 2 RS; 1 RS 0.2 x length of 1 M; m-cu postfurcal; 2 CUb arising a little above middle of hind margin of first subdiscal cell, 2 cu-a present, tubular. T 1 long, narrow, apparently fused ventrally with S 1 for most of its length, 4 x longer than apical width, apex as wide as base; surface completely striate. T 2 and following smooth, polished.	en	Wharton, Robert, Ward, Lauren, Miko, Istvan (2012): New neotropical species of Opiinae (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) reared from fruit-infesting and leaf-mining Tephritidae (Diptera) with comments on the Diachasmimorpha mexicana species group and the genera Lorenzopius and Tubiformopius. ZooKeys 243: 27-82, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990
E328B6D8408E537811B66741ECE9FB53.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Holotype female. Labrum completely concealed by mandibles; clypeus nearly as tall as wide, flat, not protruding, ventral margin convex. Mandible without basal lobe, distinctly narrowing apically to narrow, bifid tooth. Malar space distinct, malar sulcus deep, distinct. Antenna with 33 flagellomeres. Pronotum dorsally without pronope or distinct pit, mostly unsculptured, crenulate posterior margin broadly interrupted medially. Disc of mesoscutum nearly bare, with a few setae along traces of notauli; midpit small, distinct, narrowly elongate; notauli weak, present as very short, weakly sculptured grooves directed posterior-medially from and along edge of anterior declivity, not extending posteriorly onto disc of mesoscutum; distinct supra-marginal carina extending laterally from base of notaulus to tegula. Scuto-scutellar sulcus narrow (about 6 - 7 x wider than long but difficult to measure), crenulate throughout. Precoxal sulcus distinct, moderately deep, long, completely unsculptured, somewhat vertically oriented as in Lorenzopius. Propodeum granular rugose, with very short median carina anteriorly, densely setose throughout. Fore wing stigma parallel-sided to weakly expanded apically; r 1 longer than stigma width; second submarginal cell long, weakly narrowing distally; m-cu weakly postfurcal; 2 CUb arising distinctly above middle of first subdiscal cell, 2 CUa nearly absent. Hind coxa smooth; hind femur slender, weakly bilobed. T 1 weakly strigose, irregularly sculptured with smooth patches; dorsal carina short but distinct; lateral carina very well developed, extending from junction with dorsal carina to apex, passing ventrad spiracle; dorsope shallow, indistinct, laterope shallow, weakly indicated by a long, narrow groove; T 1 spiracle situated slightly posteriad midlength of T 1; T 1 narrow, parallel-sided, 2.6 x longer than apical width; no visible membrane between S 1 and T 1, though lateral margin between the two clearly visible; S 1 0.35 x length of T 1.	en	Wharton, Robert, Ward, Lauren, Miko, Istvan (2012): New neotropical species of Opiinae (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) reared from fruit-infesting and leaf-mining Tephritidae (Diptera) with comments on the Diachasmimorpha mexicana species group and the genera Lorenzopius and Tubiformopius. ZooKeys 243: 27-82, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990
84BF0FBF57619779FD1E1A4DDDCF1D97.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Holotype female. Labrum completely concealed by mandibles (Fig. 78); clypeus tall, flat, not protruding, ventral margin truncate. Mandible with broad, discrete basal lobe, apical half narrow, nearly parallel-sided. Malar space distinct; malar sulcus weak but present. Antenna with 25 flagellomeres. Pronotum not visible dorsally. Disc of mesoscutum (Figs 79, 80) bare, midpit small, round; notauli weak, present as very short, weakly sculptured grooves directed posterior-medially from and along edge of anterior declivity, not extending posteriorly onto disc of mesoscutum; weak supra-marginal carina extending laterally from base of notaulus nearly to tegula. Scuto-scutellar sulcus narrow (5 - 6 x wider than long), crenulate throughout. Precoxal sulcus absent, thus unsculptured (Fig. 83). Propodeum (Fig. 80) completely granular rugose, without carinae, very sparsely setose. Fore wing (Fig. 82) with stigma folded, shape not readily discernible; r 1 shorter than stigma width; second submarginal cell long, distinctly narrowing distally; m-cu distinctly postfurcal; 2 CUb arising below middle of first subdiscal cell. Hind coxa granular-rugose, hence the species name; hind femur slender, distinctly bilobed. T 1 (Figs 79, 80) completely striate, the striae curving medially from basal-lateral area adjacent dorsal tendon attachment, obscuring dorsal and lateral carinae; dorsope absent, laterope not apparent; T 1 spiracle indistinct, situated posteriad midlength of T 1; T 1 nearly parallel-sided, 2.25 x longer than apical width; S 1 appears fused to T 1; S 1 0.3 x length of T 1.	en	Wharton, Robert, Ward, Lauren, Miko, Istvan (2012): New neotropical species of Opiinae (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) reared from fruit-infesting and leaf-mining Tephritidae (Diptera) with comments on the Diachasmimorpha mexicana species group and the genera Lorenzopius and Tubiformopius. ZooKeys 243: 27-82, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990
80D18B1E485F11CC2B1D7B1A08C27B18.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Mandible very weakly narrowing, nearly parallel-sided over distal 0.5, more abruptly widening basally, with weak to distinct basal lobe. Labrum narrowly exposed to concealed. Clypeus relatively weakly but distinctly protruding in profile; ventral margin truncate. Malar sulcus absent or represented only by a short, weak indentation adjacent eye; malar space distinct, at least as long as basal width of mandible. Occipital carina broadly absent dorsally, present laterally, distinctly separate from hypostomal carina ventrally. First flagellomere much longer than second. Propleuron ventral-laterally without oblique carina. Notauli short, shallow, narrow, confined to anterior declivity, not extending onto disc posteriorly; distinct midpit absent. Precoxal sulcus broad, very weakly impressed, unsculptured. Propodeum granular rugose, without areola. Fore wing stigma long, narrow, curled in holotypes of both species treated below, but not as discrete distally as in Lorenzopius and Stigmatopoea; r 1 arising distinctly basad midpoint of stigma but not from extreme base; m-cu entering first submarginal cell, widely separated from second submarginal cell; second submarginal cell with 2 RS much shorter than 3 RSb; 2 CUb arising near middle of hind margin of first subdiscal cell, the posterior-distal corner of the latter broadly open. Dorsope and laterope of T 1 absent; S 1 about 0.5 - 0.6 x length of T 1, apparently fused to T 1; T 1 long and narrow throughout; T 2 and following terga unsculptured. Ovipositor not tapering evenly to a fine point. Remarks. The diagnosis above is based on the holotypes of Tubiformopius tubigaster (Fischer) and Tubiformopius tubibasis (Fischer), new combination. Fischer's (1998) original description of Tubiformopius was very brief since it was only included in a key to the eight genera he treated in the Opius genus group. Although two species are indicated in the relevant couplet, only one, designated as the type species, is specifically named. As noted above under the general discussion of genus-group characters, Fischer (1999), without discussion, treated Tubiformopius as a synonym of Lorenzopius. Aside from the original descriptions and Fischer's (1999) subsequent synonymy, neither Tubiformopius nor Lorenzopius has been further treated until now. We retain Tubiformopius as a valid genus distinct from Lorenzopius primarily on the basis of strong differences in the shape of the mandible (Fig. 85), fore wing venation (Figs 63, 65), and the notauli (Figs 86, 87). Fischer (1978) originally placed Tubiformopius tubibasis in Opius s. s. Differences in venation and the first metasomal segment (especially the long and apparently fused S 1) separate Tubiformopius from Opius s. s. Fischer (1977) placed Opius tubigaster in the subgenus Allophlebus Fischer, 1972 but the type species of Allophlebus has T 1 distinctly broadening apically with a very short, clearly separated S 1, a distinct laterope, and the fore wing m-cu is postfurcal. There is as yet no host data for either of the species currently included in Tubiformopius.	en	Wharton, Robert, Ward, Lauren, Miko, Istvan (2012): New neotropical species of Opiinae (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) reared from fruit-infesting and leaf-mining Tephritidae (Diptera) with comments on the Diachasmimorpha mexicana species group and the genera Lorenzopius and Tubiformopius. ZooKeys 243: 27-82, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990
AF1FE3078D25862A401F0B5AEE1FA57C.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Holotype male. Labrum partly concealed by mandibles (Fig. 85); clypeus nearly twice as wide as tall, protruding in profile, ventral margin truncate to very weakly concave. Mandible with basal lobe, apically nearly parallel-sided. Malar space distinct, malar sulcus not evident except as a small impression adjacent eye. Antenna with 26 flagellomeres. Pronotum dorsally not readily visible in holotype. Disc of mesoscutum nearly bare, with a sparse row of setae between notauli and transscutal articulation; midpit completely absent; notauli weak, present as very short, unsculptured grooves on anterior declivity, not extending posteriorly onto disc of mesoscutum; supra-marginal carina between base of notaulus and tegula absent. Scuto-scutellar sulcus relatively narrow (Figs 86, 87), crenulate throughout. Precoxal sulcus indistinct, short, broad, very shallow, completely unsculptured. Propodeum granular rugose, without median carina anteriorly, moderately setose. Fore wing stigma long, curled in holotype, but appears to be very gradually tapered distally; r 1 equal to or slightly longer than stigma width; second submarginal cell long, distinctly narrowing distally; m-cu widely antefurcal (Fig. 63, 65); 2 CUb arising about middle of hind margin of first subdiscal cell, 2 cu-a absent, first subdiscal cell broadly open at posterior-distal corner. Hind coxa smooth; hind femur very long, slender, weakly bilobed. T 1 (Figs 63, 65, 86, 87) completely striate, the striae curving medially from basal-lateral area adjacent dorsal tendon attachment, completely obscuring dorsal and lateral carinae; dorsope and laterope absent; T 1 spiracle indistinct, situated posteriad midlength of T 1; T 1 nearly parallel-sided, 2.1 x longer than apical width; S 1 appears fused to T 1; S 1 0.5 x length of T 1. Remarks. This species is very similar to Tubiformopius tubibasis, but differs in having a little more of the labrum exposed between the apex of the clypeus and the tightly closed mandibles. The hind coxae are yellow in Tubiformopius tubigaster and distinctly infumate in Tubiformopius tubibasis. Both species were described from Ecuador.	en	Wharton, Robert, Ward, Lauren, Miko, Istvan (2012): New neotropical species of Opiinae (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) reared from fruit-infesting and leaf-mining Tephritidae (Diptera) with comments on the Diachasmimorpha mexicana species group and the genera Lorenzopius and Tubiformopius. ZooKeys 243: 27-82, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990
730326A7E6C5F4B50EA0EE6E9548865A.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Holotype female. Labrum completely concealed by mandibles; clypeus tall, narrow, weakly protruding in profile, ventral margin truncate. Mandible with weak basal lobe, apically nearly parallel-sided. Malar space distinct, malar sulcus not evident except as a small impression adjacent eye. Antenna with 24 flagellomeres. Pronotum dorsally not readily visible in holotype. Disc of mesoscutum nearly bare, with a very sparse row of setae between notauli and transscutal articulation; midpit absent or nearly so, with faint indication of a depression when viewed in certain angles; notauli weak, present as short, weakly sculptured grooves on anterior declivity, not extending posteriorly onto disc of mesoscutum; supra-marginal carina between base of notaulus and tegula absent. Scuto-scutellar sulcus relatively narrow as in Opius tubigaster, crenulate throughout. Precoxal sulcus barely visible as a short, broad, very shallow, completely unsculptured indentation. Propodeum granular rugose, without median carina anteriorly, moderately setose. Fore wing with stigma long, curled in holotype, but very gradually tapered distally; r 1 equal to or slightly longer than stigma width; second submarginal cell long, distinctly narrowing distally; m-cu widely antefurcal; 2 CUb arising slightly below middle of hind margin of first subdiscal cell, 2 cu-a absent, first subdiscal cell broadly open at posterior-distal corner. Hind coxa smooth; hind femur very long, slender, weakly bilobed. T 1 completely striate, the striae curving medially from basal-lateral area adjacent dorsal tendon attachment, completely obscuring dorsal and lateral carinae; dorsope and laterope absent; T 1 spiracle indistinct, situated at 0.65 length of T 1; T 1 parallel-sided, 2.5 x longer than apical width; S 1 appears fused to T 1; S 1 0.6 x length of T 1.	en	Wharton, Robert, Ward, Lauren, Miko, Istvan (2012): New neotropical species of Opiinae (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) reared from fruit-infesting and leaf-mining Tephritidae (Diptera) with comments on the Diachasmimorpha mexicana species group and the genera Lorenzopius and Tubiformopius. ZooKeys 243: 27-82, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.243.3990
