taxonID	type	description	language	source
5C0E878BFFBCFFED7F91F907FB06FE76.taxon	description	Jackknife analysis resulted in 102 equally parsimonious trees presenting different topologies (L = 79; Ci = 94; Ri = 98). The strict consensus tree of 100 Jackknife replications is given in Fig. 3. When Jackknife or Bootstrap values are low, it generally indicates the clade is supported by few characters, by homoplasies or a combination of both. According to Regier et al. (2002) a clade that presents a value higher than 80 % is a strongly supported clade. The results show that the subfamily presents a 90 % supported clade.	en	De, Amabílio J. A., Mielke, Olaf H. H., Casagrande, Mirna M. (2009): Cladistic analysis of the subfamily Arsenurinae (Lepidoptera, Saturniidae) based on adult morphology. Zootaxa 2218: 1-34, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.189988
5C0E878BFFBFFFE87F91FAD1FB59FD1E.taxon	description	Except for brief proposals by Michener (1952), the tribal separation (Almeidaiini and Arsenurini) presented by Lemaire (1980) and work by Peigler (1993), the relationship among the ten genera within Arsenurinae have been incompletely presented and discussed. The results of this study corroborate Peigler (1993) only partially, with different topologies for some clades, possibly given the characters used and sample universe. The analysis resulted in the following relationship hypothesis among the genera: (Almeidaia (( Loxolomia, Copiopteryx) (Rhescyntis (( Grammopelta, Arsenura) (Caio (Paradaemonia (Dysdaemonia, Titaea ))))))). It is perhaps not surprising that the genus Almeidaia forms a separate clade, given the distinct morphological aspects compared to other Arsenurinae. This result is in agreement with Lemaire (1980), who included the group in a separate tribe. According to Lemaire (1980) and Peigler (1993), Almeidaia shares affinities with Ceratocampinae, and could be designated as a separate subfamily, being apparently a primitive group. The relationship between Loxolomia and Copiopteryx is supported by the common origin of M 3, CuA 1 and CuA 2 (character 21: 1). Similar to Peigler (1993), Rhescyntis appears neighboring this clade, although belonging to another large clade formed by the other genera.	en	De, Amabílio J. A., Mielke, Olaf H. H., Casagrande, Mirna M. (2009): Cladistic analysis of the subfamily Arsenurinae (Lepidoptera, Saturniidae) based on adult morphology. Zootaxa 2218: 1-34, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.189988
5C0E878BFFBFFFE87F91FAD1FB59FD1E.taxon	description	The relationship proposed by Michener (1952), where the genera Arsenura, Dysdaemonia, Titaea and Paradaemonia are presented as subgenera of Rhescyntis, and also the association between Loxolomia and Grammopelta proposed by Peigler (1993), were not corroborated by the cladistic analysis.	en	De, Amabílio J. A., Mielke, Olaf H. H., Casagrande, Mirna M. (2009): Cladistic analysis of the subfamily Arsenurinae (Lepidoptera, Saturniidae) based on adult morphology. Zootaxa 2218: 1-34, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.189988
