identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
6027436E9022FFF9FF457365FDF3FC09.text	6027436E9022FFF9FF457365FDF3FC09.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Neohydatothrips John 1929	<div><p>Neohydatothrips John</p><p>Diagnosis. Wing usually developed. Head transverse, occipital region narrow (Figs 10 &amp; 18); ocellar setae pair I present; mouth-cone pointed and with 3-segmented maxillary palpi. Antennae 7 or 8-segmented, segment I without dorsal apical median setae, III and IV with forked sense-cones, III–VI with microtrichia on both dorsal and ventral surfaces, VI with sense-cones having elongate narrow base. Pronotum strongly sculptured with transverse striae or reticulate, usually with a distinguishable median large blotch. Prospinasternum very weak and narrow (Fig. 20). Mesosternum with spinula. Metasternal plate T-shaped or shallowly concave at anterior margin. Fore wing first vein with complete or almost complete setal row, second vein with 1–2 setae near apex or no setae; posteromarginal cilia usually wavy. Abdominal tergites undivided from pleurotergites, tergites II–VII densely covered with microtrichia on at least lateral thirds (Fig. 14); tergite VIII with complete posteromarginal comb; tergite IX with at least 4 pairs of robust posteromarginal setae, at least 2 pairs of MD setae; sternites usually with microtrichia at least laterally. Male with a pore plate on one or more abdominal sternites; tergite IX without drepanae.</p><p>Comments. This genus can be distinguished from Sericothrips by differences of the metanotal sculpture and the position of S1 setae on abdominal tergites other than fore wing length and the microtrichia distribution on abdominal tergites mentioned as below.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6027436E9022FFF9FF457365FDF3FC09	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Masumoto, Masami;Okajima, Shûji	Masumoto, Masami, Okajima, Shûji (2020): Two new species of Neohydatothrips John (Thysanoptera, Thripidae) from Japan with a record of micropterous N. elaeagni (Kudo). Zootaxa 4869 (3): 404-412, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4869.3.6
6027436E9022FFFAFF4571FCFA56FED5.text	6027436E9022FFFAFF4571FCFA56FED5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Neohydatothrips John 1929	<div><p>Key to Japanese species of Neohydatothrips</p><p>1. Fore wing banded on distal three-fourths (Figs 4–6).......................................................... 2</p><p>-. Fore wing not banded, uniformly dark or shaded on distal three-fourths (Figs 1, 3).................................. 3</p><p>2. Fore wing with 3 dark and 3 pale areas, pale at apex, second vein with no setae (Fig. 6); abdominal segments V–VI pale brown to brown, never pale; pronotum pale with dark distinct blotch; abdominal sternites III–VI with discal and posteromarginal microtrichia throughout; in female tergite IX with 2 pairs of MD setae.................................... samayunkur</p><p>-. Fore wing with 3 dark and 2 pale areas, dark at apex, second vein with 1–2 setae (Fig. 21); abdominal segments V–VI pale; pronotum pale with slightly shaded blotch (Fig. 18); abdominal sternites III–VI without discal and posteromarginal microtrichia medially (Fig. 24); in female tergite IX with 3 pairs of MD setae (Fig. 23)........................... fascipennis sp. n.</p><p>3. Occipital area behind compound eyes long, distance between posterior margin of compound eyes and occipital ridge at least twice as long as diameter of an ommatidium (Fig. 10); postoccipital area not developed, length at most as long as diameter of an ommatidium; pronotum with no long setae............................................................... 4</p><p>-. Occipital area behind compound eyes short, posterior margin of compound eyes close to occipital ridge, distance between posterior margin of compound eyes and occipital ridge at most as long as diameter of one ommatidium; postoccipital area developed, sculptured or reticulate; pronotum with a pair of long setae at posterior margin........................... 5</p><p>4. Antennae 7-segmented; body largely dark; pronotum polygonally reticulate, with dark blotch; postoccipital area absent, at least invisible; all legs dark; in female abdominal tergite IX with 3 pairs of MD setae; male sternites III–VII each with a large oblong pore plate................................................................................... reticulatus</p><p>-. Antennae 8-segmented (Fig. 11); body distinctly bicoloured; pronotum transversely reticulate, without distinct blotch; postoccipital area short and transversely sculptured (Fig. 10); all legs largely pale; in female abdominal tergite IX with 2 pairs of MD setae (Fig. 14); male unknown................................................................. bicolor sp. n.</p><p>5. Abdominal tergites with narrow posteromarginal craspeda bearing microtrichia........................... gracilicornis</p><p>-. Abdominal tergites without posteromarginal craspeda........................................................ 6</p><p>6. Abdominal tergites II–III and VI with pair of semi-oblong dark patches; in female tergite IX with 4 pairs of MD setae................................................................................................... tabulifer</p><p>-. Abdominal tergites without such semi-oblong dark patches; in female tergite IX with at most 3 pairs of MD setae......... 7</p><p>7. Abdominal segments distinctly bicolored, with 2 pale segments; tibiae yellow; pronotal blotch not constricted medially, anterior margin almost straight............................................................................ medius</p><p>-. Abdominal segments almost uniformly dark, often one segment slightly paler but never distinctly bicolored; tibiae dark; pronotal blotch more or less constricted medially, anterior margin concave.......................................... 8</p><p>8. Abdominal tergites IV–VI with 4–7 setae outside of S3 (posteromarginal setae); sternites entirely covered with microtrichial rows; male sternite VII with a small pore plate..................................................... mitubautugi</p><p>-. Abdominal tergites IV–VI with 3 setae outside of S3 (posteromarginal setae); sternites without microtrichial rows medially; male sternite without pore plate or male unknown........................................................... 9</p><p>9. Ocellar setae III situated on anterior margin of ocellar triangle; pronotum with anastomosing transverse lines, blotch constricted at middle; abdominal tergites without wrinkles at lateral microtrichial fields, tergites VII and VIII without microtrichia posteromedially, female tergite IX with 2 pairs of anterior setae; tegula without microtrichia; male unknown; often micropterous (Figs 8 &amp; 16)....................................................................................... elaeagni</p><p>-. Ocellar setae III situated distinctly lateral to anterior margin of ocellar triangle; pronotum with transverse reticulations bearing small wrinkles, blotch not constricted at middle; abdominal tergites with wrinkles at lateral microtrichial fields, tergites VII and VIII with microtrichia throughout, female tergite IX with 3 pairs of anterior setae; tegula with microtrichia; male without pore plate; always macropterous..................................................................... ponyaunpe</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6027436E9022FFFAFF4571FCFA56FED5	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Masumoto, Masami;Okajima, Shûji	Masumoto, Masami, Okajima, Shûji (2020): Two new species of Neohydatothrips John (Thysanoptera, Thripidae) from Japan with a record of micropterous N. elaeagni (Kudo). Zootaxa 4869 (3): 404-412, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4869.3.6
6027436E9021FFFBFF4574BAFB70F9FD.text	6027436E9021FFFBFF4574BAFB70F9FD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Neohydatothrips bicolor Masumoto & Okajima 2020	<div><p>Neohydatothrips bicolor sp. n.</p><p>(Figs 1, 7, 10–15)</p><p>Female macroptera. Body bicolored (Figs 1 &amp; 7), head, mesothorax, metanotum, abdominal segments VII–IX brown, metasternum (Fig. 12), abdominal segments I–III and X pale brown, pronotum and abdominal segments IV–VI yellow, metapleural area yellow but often shaded, abdominal tergites II–VII with antecostal ridge darker, the ridge weak at middle of VII; antennal segments I–II yellow, III–V yellow with apex pale brown, V–VIII pale brown; fore wing including clavus pale brown with subbasal area pale (Fig. 13); all legs almost uniformly yellow but often with small weakly shaded spots on femora and tibiae; major body setae pale or weakly shaded. Head about 0.7 times as long as wide, weakly sculptured with anastomosing transverse striae dorsally, weakly reticulate within ocellar triangle but almost smooth between hind ocelli; occipital area long, distance between posterior margin of compound eyes and occipital apodeme about twice as long as diameter of an ommatidium, postoccipital area short and transversely striate (Fig. 10); ocellar setae pair III within or on anterior margin of ocellar triangle; postocular setae 3 pairs along posterior inner margin of compound eyes, S1 setae (median pair of setae) subequal in length to ocellar setae pair III. Antennae 8-segmented (Fig. 11), segments III and IV with weak apical neck, IV and V pedicelate, III longest. Ratio length/width of antennal segments I–VIII as follows: 0.8, 1.2–1.3, 2.8–2.9, 2.6–3.1, 2.2–2.5, 2.4–2.8, 1.2–1.3, 2.5–3.0. Pronotum about 0.7 times as long as wide, with 19–22 discal setae and no long setae, sculptured with transverse anastomosing striae, no wrinkles between transverse striae; blotch weakly defined, only anterior margin visible. Mesonotum sculptured with transverse anastomosing striae, smooth anterior one-fourth; median pair of setae anterior to submedian pair. Metanotum reticulate transversely at middle and striate longitudinally at each side; median pair of setae behind anterior margin. Tegula without microtrichia. Fore wing with veinal setae shorter than one-third of median width of wing, first vein with short gap in setal row near apex, second vein with 2 setae on distal area. Abdominal tergites with no wrinkles between striae, 3–4 small dark spots along antecostal ridge on each side of II–VII (Fig. 14); tergite I with microtrichia laterally; tergites II–VI with discal microtrichia lateral to S2 setae, a few rows of microtrichia reaching to median CPS on V–VI, posteromarginal microtrichia lateral to S2 setae but a few minute microtrichia extending mesad of S2 setae; tergites VII–VIII with discal microtrichia lateral to S1 setae, posteromarginal microtrichia on VII small at mesad of S1 setae and narrowly lacking at middle; tergite IX with 2 pairs of MD setae (3 setae on left side of holotype), 1.1–1.2 times as long as median length of tergite X; sternites with microtrichia at outside of S2 setae, posteromarginal microtrichia sparse, absent between S1 setae, 2–4 small dark spots along antecostal ridge on each side of II–VII (Fig. 15) .</p><p>Measurements (holotype female in microns). Distended body length 1400. Head length 108 (length including anterior prolongation 128), width across cheeks 155; compound eyes dorsal length 83, width 50. Ocellar setae III length 25, interval 24. Postocular setae I length 25–33. Pronotal median length 138, width 203. Metanotal median length 73, median pair of setae length 30–31. Fore wing length 760, width at middle 50. Abdominal tergite IX length 83, tergite X length 75. Ovipositor length 310. Antennal segments I–VIII length (width) as follows: 25 (30), 40 (31), 65 (23), 63 (20), 50 (20), 48 (20), 10 (8), 13 (5).</p><p>Male unknown.</p><p>Type series. Holotype female. JAPAN, Honshu: Kanagawa-ken, Yokosuka-shi, Kurihamadai, on young leaf of Wisteria floribunda [Leguminosae], 5.v.2017, M. Masumoto . Paratypes: JAPAN, Honshu: 14 females collected together with holotype. 12 females, same locality and host plant with holotype, 7.v.2017. Yokosuka-shi, Mt. Takatori-yama, 1 female young leaf of Wisteria floribunda, 5.v.2016. Mt. Take-yama, young leaf of Wisteria floribunda, 5.v.2019. Chiba-ken: Narita-shi, Ohtake, 1 female on young leaf of Wisteria floribunda, 3.v.2015. Narita-shi, Ohtake, Sakatagaike-kouen park, 5 females on young leaf of Wisteria floribunda, 10.v.2015; 9 females on young leaf of Wisteria floribunda, 9.v.2015. Futtsu-shi, foot of Mt. Nokogiri-yama, 3 females on young leaf of Wisteria floribunda, 5.v.2015. Yamanashi-ken, Hokuto-shi [N35.48.35, E138.27.37, alt. 650m], 2 females on young leaf of Wisteria floribunda, 3.v.2016. (all M. Masumoto). Osaka-fu, Sakai-shi, Minami-ku, 2 females on leaf of Wisteria floribunda, 11.v.2014, Y.Kojima .</p><p>Non-paratypic specimen. JAPAN, Honshu: Tokyo-to, Aomi, 1 female on Styrax japonica [ Styracaceae], 17.iv.2013; 1 female on Imperata cylindrical [ Poaceae], 2.v.2014. (all. M. Masumoto). The holotype and most paratypes are deposited in TUA.</p><p>Comments. This new species apparently has a unique combination of character states in the subfamily as follows: pronotum with no long setae and indistinct blotch, and fore wing with short veinal setae.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6027436E9021FFFBFF4574BAFB70F9FD	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Masumoto, Masami;Okajima, Shûji	Masumoto, Masami, Okajima, Shûji (2020): Two new species of Neohydatothrips John (Thysanoptera, Thripidae) from Japan with a record of micropterous N. elaeagni (Kudo). Zootaxa 4869 (3): 404-412, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4869.3.6
6027436E9020FFFCFF4574E9FBEDFCB1.text	6027436E9020FFFCFF4574E9FBEDFCB1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Neohydatothrips elaeagni (Kudo 1991)	<div><p>Neohydatothrips elaeagni (Kudo)</p><p>(Figs 2, 3, 16 &amp; 17)</p><p>Hydatothrips (Neohydatothrips) elaeagni Kudo, 1991: 535 .</p><p>Neohydatothrips popli Han, 1991: 449 . [Synonymized by Wang, 2007.]</p><p>This species was described from Elaeagnus umbellata [ Elaeagnaceae] based on the macropterous female in Hokkaido, Japan, and Han (1991) described N. popli, which was synonymized by Wang (2007), from Populus sp. [ Salicaceae] based on both sexes. Thereafter, it has been collected from not only Elaeagnus but also Salix [ Salicaceae] in Honshu. Moreover, micropterous females were recorded in Honshu (Okajima 2000) but their character states have never been described so far. The micropterous and macropterous females of N. elaeagni have almost same character states, but in the micropterous form the abdominal tergites II–VIII are almost uniformly covered with microtrichia, the discal setae are shorter than on the macropterous form, and all the tergites have posteromarginal microtrichia (Fig. 17). In the macropterous form the abdominal tergites have no microtrichia posteromedially and posteromarginal microtrichia are absent between S2 setae except on tergite VIII. Thus, the micropterous form is similar to species of Sericothrips . However, it can be distinguished from Sericothrips by the metanotum without microtrichia, abdominal tergite I without microtrichia medially and tergites II–VIII with S1 setae not similar in size and position. In the micropterous form of N. abnormis, the fore wing is longer than the width of the mesothorax, but in N. elaeagni the fore wing is lobe-like and much shorter than the width of thorax (Figs 8 &amp; 16). Sericothrips looks like micropterous form of Neohydatothrips (also see, Lima &amp; Mound 2016b), but molecular data Buckman et al. (2013) suggested that Neohydatothrips was sister group of Hydatothrips rather than Sericothrips, although only three species of these three genera were included in that analysis.</p><p>Specimens examined. JAPAN: Honshu: Iwate-ken, Morioka-shi, nr. Shijyushida-damu; 24 females (mic) on leaves of Salix integra [ Salicaceae], 64 females (mic) on Elaeagnus sp. [ Elaeagnaceae], 11.v.1999, T. Nonaka (TUA). Tokyo-to, The Imperial Palace Grounds, Fukiage-gyoen, 30 females (24 mac &amp; 6 mic), 30.iv.1999, S. Okajima (TUA). Kanagawa-ken, Yokohama-shi, Kanazawa-shizen park, 62 micropterous females on Elaeagnus umbellata [ Elaeagnaceae], 1.v.2005, M.Masumoto (TUA). Hiroshima-ken, Mihara-shi, Hongou-cho, 9 micropterous females on Elaeagnus umbellata [ Elaeagnaceae], 4.v.2008, Y.Kojima (TUA).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6027436E9020FFFCFF4574E9FBEDFCB1	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Masumoto, Masami;Okajima, Shûji	Masumoto, Masami, Okajima, Shûji (2020): Two new species of Neohydatothrips John (Thysanoptera, Thripidae) from Japan with a record of micropterous N. elaeagni (Kudo). Zootaxa 4869 (3): 404-412, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4869.3.6
6027436E9027FFFFFF4571A5FBEAFC66.text	6027436E9027FFFFFF4571A5FBEAFC66.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Neohydatothrips fascipennis Masumoto & Okajima 2020	<div><p>Neohydatothrips fascipennis sp. n.</p><p>(Figs 4, 5, 9, 18–25)</p><p>Female macroptera. Body bicolored (Fig. 4), head, pterothorax and abdominal segments VII–IX dark brown, abdominal segments I–IV and X brown, pronotum yellow with blotch slightly shaded, abdominal segments V–VI yellow, abdominal tergites II–VIII with antecostal ridge dark; antennal segment I pale brown slightly paler than VI, II–III yellow, IV yellow with apical neck pale brown, V–VIII pale brown; fore wing brown with 2 pale bands at subbasal and middle areas (Fig. 21); fore and mid femora yellow but often shaded at middle of mid femora, hind femora brown with yellow at base and extreme apex, all tibiae yellow but slightly shaded at middle of mid and hind tibiae, all tarsi yellow; major body setae shaded. Head 0.7–0.8 times as long as wide, weakly sculptured with transverse anastomosing striae dorsally, weakly reticulate within ocellar triangle; occipital area short, distance between posterior margin of compound eyes and occipital apodeme almost as long as diameter of one ommatidium, postoccipital area developed and transversely striate (Fig. 18); ocellar setae pair III on anterior margin of ocellar triangle; postocular setae 3 pairs along posterior inner margin of compound eyes, S1 setae much longer than remaining setae, subequal length to ocellar setae pair III. Antennae 8-segmented (Fig. 19), segments III and IV with weak apical neck, IV and V pedicelate, III longest. Ratio length/width of antennal segments I–VIII as follows: 0.9, 1.4–1.6, 3.4–3.8, 3.6–4.0, 2.8, 3.7–3.9, 1.5–1.7, 3.5. Pronotum 0.6–0.7 times as long as wide, with 15–18 discal setae, sculptured with transverse anastomosing striae, almost smooth between transverse striae; posteromarginal setae much longer than discal setae, about 0.4 times as long as median length of pronotum; blotch slightly shaded, weak but distinct except posterolaterally, constricted at middle. Mesonotum closely sculptured with transverse anastomosing striae; median pair of setae anterior to submedian pair. Metanotum sculptured transversely anteromedially and longitudinally at each side, irregularly reticulate at middle; median pair of setae behind anterior margin. Tegula without microtrichia. Fore wing with veinal setae dark and almost as long as median width of wing, first vein with short gap in setal row near apex, second vein with 2 setae on distal area. Abdominal tergites with no wrinkles between striae, often with 7 setae on one side of IV or V or VI–VII; tergite I with microtrichia between median CPS and laterally; tergites II–VII with 4–6 small dark spots along antecostal ridge on each side (Fig. 23), with discal microtrichia lateral to S2 setae, a few microtrichia extending to mesad of S1 setae along antecostal ridges on II–IV, reaching to S1 setae medially and several rows across the tergites in front of S1 setae on V–VII, discal microtrichia stouter on II–IV than on posterior tergites (Fig. 22), with posteromarginal microtrichia lateral to S2 setae but often near reaching to S1 setae on V–VI and complete on VII, a few minute microtrichia at mesad of S2 setae on III–IV or V; tergite VIII with weak microtrichia, only a few microtrichia extending to mesad of S1 setae, smooth anteriorly and medially; tergite IX with 3 pairs of MD setae and no microtrichia, 1.3–1.5 times as long as median length of tergite X; sternites with discal and posteromarginal microtrichia lateral to S2 setae on II–VI (Fig. 24), 4–6 small dark spots along antecostal ridge on each side of III–VII.</p><p>Measurements (holotype female in microns). Distended body length 1630. Head length 118 (length including anterior prolongation 130), width across cheeks 163; compound eyes dorsal length 83, width 53. Ocellar setae III length 30, interval 25. Postocular setae I length 30–38. Pronotal median length 145, width 215; posteromarginal setae length 56–60. Metanotal median length 80, median pair of setae length 38. Fore wing length 910, width at middle 50. Abdominal tergite IX length 123, tergite X length 93. Ovipositor length 410. Antennal segments I–VIII length (width) as follows: 30 (33), 48 (30), 80 (23), 75 (20), 55 (20), 65 (18), 13 (8), 18 (8).</p><p>Male macroptera. General structure similar to female, abdominal segments V–VII yellow (Figs 5, 9). Abdominal sternites with microtrichia slightly extending to mesad of S2 setae, sternite VII with an oval small pore plate, 13–15 microns width (Fig. 25).</p><p>Measurements (paratype males in microns). Distended body length 1130–1150. Head length 93–95, width across cheeks 143–150; compound eyes dorsal length 60–65, width 50–55. Ocellar setae III length 21, interval 20. Postocular setae I length 29–33. Pronotal median length 118–120, width 183–188; posteromarginal setae length 43–52. Metanotal median length 65–68, median pair of setae length 30–38. Fore wing length 740–750, width at middle 40–50. Antennal segments I–VIII length (width) as follows: 25–28 (30), 38–40 (28), 65 (20), 68 (18–19), 50–68 (18–20), 48–58 (18), 8–10 (8), 13 (5).</p><p>Type series. Holotype female. JAPAN: Honshu: Hiroshima-ken, Mihara-shi, Hongou-cho, on leaf and stem of Elaeagnus umbellata [ Elaeagnaceae], 4.v.2008, Y. Kojima. Paratypes: JAPAN, Honshu: 31 females &amp; 10 males, same data as holotype. Fukushima-ken, Kitashiobara-mura, Hibara, nr. Renge-numa pond (alt. 820m), 12 females &amp; 9 males on Elaeagnus umbellata, 21.vi.2020, T. Tsutsumi. Tochigi-ken, Ichikai-machi, 1 female &amp; 1 male on Elaeagnus umbellata, 11.v.2020, S. Okajima. The holotype and most paratypes are deposited in TUA.</p><p>Comments. N. fascipennis is slightly similar to N. hemileucus (Hood) from Brazil and N. variabilis (Beach) from North America by having fore wing with two dark bands at distal three-fourth and bicoloured body. N. hemileucus also shares pale pronotum with indistinct blotch and postocular setae arranged longitudinally (Lima &amp; Mound 2016a). However, N. fascipennis can be distinguished from N. hemileucus by the fore wings with apex dark and abdominal tergite IX with three pairs of MD setae, whereas the later species has the fore wings pale at apex and tergite IX with two pairs of MD setae. N. variabilis differs from this new species by having fore wing pale at apex, abdominal tergites IV–VI pale with median and anterolateral areas, tergite IX with two pairs of MD setae, and the sternites with microtrichia medially (Mound et al. 2019; Lima &amp; Mound 2016a).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6027436E9027FFFFFF4571A5FBEAFC66	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Masumoto, Masami;Okajima, Shûji	Masumoto, Masami, Okajima, Shûji (2020): Two new species of Neohydatothrips John (Thysanoptera, Thripidae) from Japan with a record of micropterous N. elaeagni (Kudo). Zootaxa 4869 (3): 404-412, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4869.3.6
