identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
98C32C99C66753EA9D3C20632C2D9E35.text	98C32C99C66753EA9D3C20632C2D9E35.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Camelliastrum Nakai, J. Jap. Bot. 16: 699. (1940)	<div><p>1. Camelliastrum Nakai, J. Jap. Bot. 16: 699. (1940)</p><p>Type</p><p>( “lectotype”, Art. 10 Note 1 of the ICN; designated here): Camelliastrum caudatum (Wall.) Nakai.</p><p>Nomenclatural notes.</p><p>Nakai (1940) established the genus Camelliastrum to categorize six species in China and Japan, including Camelliastrum assimile (Champ. ex Benth.) Nakai, Camelliastrum buisanense (Sasaki) Nakai, Camelliastrum caudatum, Camelliastrum gracile (Hemsl.) Nakai, Camelliastrum mairei (H. Lév .) Nakai and Camelliastrum salicifolium (Champ.) Nakai, but did not designate a type. Based on the description in the protologue, Camelliastrum caudatum is selected as the type of the genus. The basionym of Camelliastrum caudatum, Camellia caudata Wall., was lectotypified by Zhao et al. (2017b: 172) as the specimen H. Bruce s.n. in Wallich 978 (right-hand specimen of K001110475. An image is available at http://www.kew.org/herbcatimg/680707.jpg). Therefore, this specimen becomes the type of Camelliastrum (Art. 10.1 of the ICN).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/98C32C99C66753EA9D3C20632C2D9E35	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Zhao, Dongwei	Zhao, Dongwei (2022): Nomenclatural notes and typification of three synonyms of Camellia (Theaceae). PhytoKeys 193: 1-8, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.193.78810, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.193.78810
1364F261B2CA57A6950FD3DEB09EA5B0.text	1364F261B2CA57A6950FD3DEB09EA5B0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Desmitus Raf., Sylva Tellur. 139. (1838)	<div><p>2. Desmitus Raf., Sylva Tellur. 139. (1838)</p><p>Type.</p><p>Desmitus reticulata (Lindl.) Raf. ≡ Camellia reticulata Lindl., Bot. Reg. 13: t. 1078 (1827).</p><p>Lectotype</p><p>(designated here): Lindl., Bot. Reg. 13: t. 1078 (1827).</p><p>Nomenclatural notes.</p><p>Rafinesque (1838) established the monotypic genus Desmitus for D. reticulata . This was a new combination based on C. reticulata because he referenced the basionym by the words "Camel. do bot. reg. 1978...". However, the taxon number cited by Rafinesque (1838: 140) is incorrect, but should be recognized as a correctable typographical error of “1078” and so does not prohibit the valid publication of the new combination (Art. 41.3 of the ICN). Nevertheless, Lindley (1827: t. 1078) described C. reticulata based on the living plants that bore semidouble flowers and introduced from China. No specimen was cited in the protologue of C. reticulata . The coloured drawing, t. 1078, was accompanied by the protologue and therefore designated as the lectotype of C. reticulata . Accordingly, the drawing serves as the type of Desmitus (Art. 10.1 of the ICN).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1364F261B2CA57A6950FD3DEB09EA5B0	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Zhao, Dongwei	Zhao, Dongwei (2022): Nomenclatural notes and typification of three synonyms of Camellia (Theaceae). PhytoKeys 193: 1-8, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.193.78810, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.193.78810
3F90E0B0B5E45C1489F4081176700977.text	3F90E0B0B5E45C1489F4081176700977.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Salceda Blanco, Fl. Filip. ed. 2: 374. (1845)	<div><p>3. Salceda Blanco, Fl. Filip. ed. 2: 374. (1845)</p><p>Type.</p><p>Salceda montana Blanco</p><p>Neotype</p><p>(designated here): Philippines. Luzon: Bulacan, Angat, February 1919, Ramos &amp; Edaño 34071 (K!; isoneotypes: BM!, P04511451 [the image is available at https://science.mnhn.fr/institution/mnhn/collection/p/item/p04511451]!, and US 00113902 [the image is available at http://n2t.net/ark:/65665/3e093c26d-7aa1-4494-8723-989167baf8ba]!).</p><p>Nomenclatural notes.</p><p>Blanco (1845: 374) established the monotypic genus Salceda for S. montana . Merrill (1905: 21) transferred the species to Thea as T. montana (Blanco) Merr. and stated that “Blanco’s specimens were from Angat, Province of Bulacan". However, the types of Blanco’s species were suggested to be either all destroyed (Merrill 1905: 6) or no longer extant (Merrill 1918: 5). I also failed to find the original material of S. montana . Based on the protologue (Blanco 1845: 374), a specimen collected from the same locality, Ramos &amp; Edaño 34071 (K), is designated as the neotype of S. montana because it bears flower fragments and seeds on the sheet.</p><p>Illegitimate replacement names for Camellia and Thea</p><p>Thea L., a genus established by Linnaeus (1753: 515) for tea ( T. sinensis L., currently C. sinensis [L.] Kuntze), was treated as a synonym of Camellia by Sweet (1818: 157). Theaphylla Raf. and Tsia Adans. are illegitimate replacement names for Thea because Thea was cited in the synonymies of them (Adanson 1763: 613; Rafinesque 1830: 267), which makes Tsia and Theaphylla nomenclaturally superfluous (Arts. 6.11, 52.1 &amp; 52.2[e] of the ICN). Similarly, Kemelia Raf. and Tsubaki Adans. are illegitimate replacement names for Camellia (Adanson 1763: 399; Rafinesque 1838: 139) because Camellia was cited as a synonym of them (Arts. 6.11, 52.1 &amp; 52.2[e] of the ICN). Therefore, the four names, Kemelia, Theaphylla, Tsia and Tsubaki, are rejected under Art. 52.1 of the ICN.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3F90E0B0B5E45C1489F4081176700977	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Zhao, Dongwei	Zhao, Dongwei (2022): Nomenclatural notes and typification of three synonyms of Camellia (Theaceae). PhytoKeys 193: 1-8, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.193.78810, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.193.78810
