identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
6D5D87B9FFFFFFEBA4F10A72FB5FCE55.text	6D5D87B9FFFFFFEBA4F10A72FB5FCE55.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Lathomicrus	<div><p>Genus Lathomicrus gen. n.</p><p>Type species. Neseuthia sumatrana Franz, 1984 .</p><p>Diagnosis. Tempora distinct, short; maxillary palpomere III inversely conical, maxillary palpomere IV as broad as apex of palpomere III, button-shaped; pronotum with four ante-basal foveae, internal foveae connected by transverse groove; each elytron with humeral denticle connected with humeral carina, without subhumeral carina; prosternal intercoxal process with broadened ventral surface so that internal margins of procoxae in ventral view concealed by lateral margins of process (Fig. 7); mesoventral intercoxal process nearly equal in width to prosternal process, with subtriangular anterior part and divergent posterior arms (Fig. 7).</p><p>Description. General morphology (Figs. 1, 3) resembling Cephennomicrus; body very small and slender, covered with distinct vestiture.</p><p>Head broadest at large eyes, with very short but distinct tempora; maxillary palps with very short palpomere I, strongly elongate and slightly clavate palpomere II, large and very broad palpomere IV strongly and gradually broadened from base to apex, and broad but very short palpomere IV; antennae with large scape and pedicell, slender and moderately compactly assembled antennomeres III–VIII and indistinctly delimited, three-segmented club, with terminal antennomere divided into cylindrical basal part and subconical apical part delimited by ring of setae. Antennae (Fig. 5) covered with sparse short and suberect setae and additionally with several long strongly erect setae located on antennomeres I, VII and IX–XI.</p><p>Pronotum (Fig. 3) subrectangular in shape, with rounded anterior margin, microserrate lateral margins forming entire lateral carinae, and bisinuate posterior margin; base with two lateral pairs of small foveae, internal foveae connected by transverse groove; margins of pronotum without long setae. Prosternum (Fig. 7) with short basisternal part; prosternal intercoxal process broad and with laterally expanded ventral surface (Tshaped in cross-section), so that internal margins of procoxae in ventral view are concealed under lateral margins of prosternal process; hypomera broad, not divided.</p><p>Mesoventrite (Fig. 7) with mesoventral intercoxal process comparable in width to procoxal process, lateral margins of process are nearly parallel in middle, convergent anteriorly to form subtriangular shape, and divergent posteriorly to form distinct posterior arms.</p><p>Elytra (Figs. 1, 3) entire, oval, each with small humeral denticle connected posteriorly to long longitudinal carina; basal fovea indistinct. Mesoscutellum subtriangular, well visible in intact specimen.</p><p>Metaventrite (Fig. 7) long, with metaventral intercoxal process broader than mesoventral process; mesepisterna visible in ventral view.</p><p>Legs (Fig. 7). Procoxae short, nearly spherical; mesocoxae oval; metacoxae strongly transverse; all femora clavate; tibiae and tarsi slender.</p><p>Abdomen with six visible, non-modified sternites.</p><p>Aedeagus (Figs. 9, 10) symmetrical, with tubular internal armature; parameres free, with apical setae.</p><p>Distribution. Sumatra.</p><p>Etymology. The name is derived from a Greek noun "λάθOς" (lathos), meaning "escape from detection" (contemporarily also "an error, fault, mistake, oversight"), combined with the Greek adjective "μɭκρός" (mikros) by analogy to Cephennomicrus and to emphasize the extremely small body size of the type species. Gender masculine.</p><p>Remarks. The new genus shares a number of characters with other Cephenniini, especially with Cephennomicrus, Cephennula Jałoszyński, 2008 b and Trurlia Jałoszyński, 2009a, all of them possibly forming a distinct lineage within the tribe. Members of this complex differ from all other genera of Cephenniini in having more than two ante-basal foveae on the pronotum (a single pair or lack of pronotal foveae in all other cephenniines). Lathomicrus shows several characters that may be interpreted as transitions between structures found in Cephennomicrus and Cephennula. In Cephennomicrus the elytra lack longitudinal humeral carinae, which are present in Lathomicrus and Cephennula, but the latter has additionally subhumeral carinae. The internal pair of ante-basal pronotal foveae in some species of Cephennomicrus are connected by a transverse groove, in some others the groove is missing, while the foveae in Cephennula and Lathomicrus are connected. The prosternal intercoxal process in Cephennomicrus and Lathomicrus lacks the anterior margin (i.e., its anterior part is not separated from the basisternum), while in Cephennula and Trurlia it is separated from the basisternum and has a clearly delimited anterior part. However, in Cephennomicrus the prosternal process is more or less rectangular in cross-section, so that the internal margins of procoxae are visible in ventral view (Fig. 8), whereas in Lathomicrus, Cephennula and Trurlia the prosternal process has laterally expanded ventral surface, so that it is T-shaped in cross-section and the internal margins of procoxae are not visible in ventral view (Fig. 7). Therefore, the prosternal intercoxal process of Lathomicrus represents a transition between the simple process in Cephennomicrus and the strongly expanded process in Cephennula and Trurlia. The mesoventral intercoxal process of Lathomicrus may also be regarded as a transitional form between Cephennomicrus and Cephennula, with an additional step in the morphocline represented by Trurlia. In Cephennomicrus the mesoventral process is not delimited from the ventrite anteriorly and is typically very broad (Fig. 8) and relatively low (i.e., only slightly protruding ventrally), but shows a tendency to reducing in width in some species, e.g. in C. minimus (Franz, 1983) (illustrated in Jałoszyński 2009b). In Trurlia, the process is narrow and higher (i.e., more protruding ventrally), but still not delimited anteriorly. In Lathomicrus the mesoventral process is narrow, higher (more expanded ventrally) than in Cephennomicrus and Trurlia, clearly delimited anteriorly, and in cross-section subrectangular making the internal margins of mesocoxae well visible in ventral view (Fig. 7). In Cephennula the mesoventral process is the most derived; it is not only high, narrow and delimited anteriorly, but also its ventral surface is expanded in a way similar to the prosternal process, so that the internal margins of mesocoxae are also hidden and not visible in ventral view.</p><p>Genera of the Old World Cephenniini can be identified by means of the key presented below. The remaining, exclusively Neotropical genera require revision and will be treated separately.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6D5D87B9FFFFFFEBA4F10A72FB5FCE55	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Jałoszyński, Paweł	Jałoszyński, Paweł (2010): Notes on identity of Cephennomicrus sumatranus (Franz) (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Scydmaeninae). Zootaxa 2517: 25-32, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.196159
6D5D87B9FFFDFFEBA4F10902FA6ECB60.text	6D5D87B9FFFDFFEBA4F10902FA6ECB60.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cephenniini	<div><p>Key to Old World genera of the Cephenniini</p><p>1 Antennae 10-segmented, with terminal antennomere forming large oval club .................. Trurlia Jałoszyński, 2009a</p><p>- Antennae 11-segmented, gradually thickened or with separated club.......................................................................... 2</p><p>2 Basisternum much longer than procoxal cavities ........................................................................... Etelea Csiki, 1909</p><p>- Basisternum shorter than procoxal cavities ................................................................................................................. 3</p><p>3 Internal margins of procoxae in ventral view hidden under expanded laterally ventral surface of prosternal process. ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 4</p><p>- Internal margins of procoxae visible in ventral view, prosternal process missing or its ventral surface not expanded laterally ......................................................................................................................................................................... 5</p><p>4 Pronotum with sublateral carinae ................................................................................ Cephennula Jałoszynski, 2008b</p><p>- Pronotum without sublateral carinae ............................................................................................. Lathomicrus gen. n.</p><p>5 Pronotum without foveae.............................................................................................................................................. 6</p><p>- Pronotum with ante-basal foveae.................................................................................................................................. 7</p><p>6 Antennae with indistinct 3-segmented club......................................................... Cephennium Müller &amp; Kunze, 1822</p><p>- Antennae with distinct 2-segmented club ............................................................. Nanophthalmus Motschulsky, 1851</p><p>7 Basal elytral foveae, if present, never filled with setae; pronotum usually with four foveae ........................................ ....................................................................................................................................... Cephennomicrus Reitter, 1907</p><p>- Basal elytral foveae filled with short and dense setae; pronotum always with two foveae.......................................... 8</p><p>8 Prosternal process very short, not protruding ventrally beyond procoxae ................... Hlavaciellus Jałoszyński, 2006</p><p>- Prosternal process long, protruding ventrally beyond procoxae ........................................ Cephennodes Reitter, 1884</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6D5D87B9FFFDFFEBA4F10902FA6ECB60	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Jałoszyński, Paweł	Jałoszyński, Paweł (2010): Notes on identity of Cephennomicrus sumatranus (Franz) (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Scydmaeninae). Zootaxa 2517: 25-32, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.196159
6D5D87B9FFFDFFEDA4F10C1FFEB8CA1A.text	6D5D87B9FFFDFFEDA4F10C1FFEB8CA1A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Lathomicrus sumatranus (Franz 1984) Franz 1984	<div><p>Lathomicrus sumatranus (Franz, 1984), comb. n.</p><p>(Figs. 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 10)</p><p>Neseuthia sumatrana Franz, 1984: 89; fixed as the correct original spelling by the first reviser (Jałoszyński 2008a). Neseuthia sumatrensis; Franz, 1984: 90 (incorrect original spelling used in legend of Fig. 1). Cephennomicrus sumatranus; Jałoszyński, 2008a: 34.</p><p>Type material. Holotype: INDONESIA: ♂, two white typed labels: "Sumatra, Babahrot", "lg.Klapperich, Juli–Aug.1983 ", white label with handwritten " Neseuthia sumatrana m." and printed "det. H. Franz", red handwritten label " Holotypus ", white printed label " LATHOMICRUS sumatranus (Franz), det. P. JAŁOSZYŃSKI, 2008" (NHMW).</p><p>Diagnosis. The only known species is diagnosable on the basis of generic characters; aedeagus must be examined to confirm identification.</p><p>Redescription. BL 0.64. Body of male (Figs. 1, 3) slender, slightly flattened, sides of pronotum and elytra nearly confluent, pigmentation light brown, vestiture yellowish.</p><p>Head moderately large, HL 0.10, HW 0.15, vertex and frontoclypeal area strongly convex and rounded together, eyes large, coarsely faceted and strongly convex; punctures on head very fine but dense, indistinctly marked, barely noticeable at magnification 80x; setae short, dense and nearly recumbent. Antennae as in Fig. 5, AnL 0.27.</p><p>Pronotum (Fig. 3) subrectangular in shape, broadest near anterior fourth, PL 0.17, PW 0.25, anterior margin weakly rounded; lateral margins strongly rounded in anterior fourth, then nearly straight and slightly convergent toward sharp hind angles; posterior margin deeply bisinuate; base of pronotum with distinct broad and deep transverse groove with each end slightly impressed and small fovea near each hind angle. Punctures very dense but very small, moderately sharply marked, noticeable at magnification 40x; setae very dense, short and nearly recumbent.</p><p>Elytra (Fig. 3) oval, as convex as pronotum and only slightly broader, broadest distinctly anterior to middle, EL 0.37, EW 0.29, EI 1.27; each humerus with small but distinct humeral denticle and narrow humeral carina slightly longer than half length of elytra; base of each elytron with broad and short impression; basal foveae not discernible; apices of elytra rounded together. Metathoracic wings well developed. Mesoscutellum visible, subtriangular with rounded margins.</p><p>Legs (Fig. 7) slender, relatively short.</p><p>Ventral view as in Fig. 7; metaventrite non-modified, without tubercles or impressions.</p><p>Aedeagus (Figs. 9, 10) stout, drop-shaped, AeL 0.12; apex subtriangular, blunt, slightly curved dorsally; internal armature composed of broad median tubular structure; parameres slender, each with two apical setae.</p><p>Female. Unknown.</p><p>Distribution. Sumatra.</p><p>Remarks. The original label reads " Juli–Aug.1983 ", while Franz (1984) gave " 20. August 1983 " as the collecting date.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6D5D87B9FFFDFFEDA4F10C1FFEB8CA1A	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Jałoszyński, Paweł	Jałoszyński, Paweł (2010): Notes on identity of Cephennomicrus sumatranus (Franz) (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Scydmaeninae). Zootaxa 2517: 25-32, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.196159
6D5D87B9FFFBFFEDA4F10DB6FE51C915.text	6D5D87B9FFFBFFEDA4F10DB6FE51C915.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cephennomicrus Reitter 1907	<div><p>Genus Cephennomicrus Reitter, 1907</p><p>Cephennomicrus Reitter, 1907: 297 . Type species: Cephennomicrus perpunctillum Reitter, 1907 (by monotypy). Neseuthia Scott, 1922: 201 . Type species: Neseuthia typica Scott, 1922 (by original designation). Synonymized by Jałoszyński (2008a).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6D5D87B9FFFBFFEDA4F10DB6FE51C915	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Jałoszyński, Paweł	Jałoszyński, Paweł (2010): Notes on identity of Cephennomicrus sumatranus (Franz) (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Scydmaeninae). Zootaxa 2517: 25-32, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.196159
6D5D87B9FFFBFFEEA4F10EC0FDBBC835.text	6D5D87B9FFFBFFEEA4F10EC0FDBBC835.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cephennomicrus fesumatranus	<div><p>Cephennomicrus fesumatranus sp. n.</p><p>(Figs. 2, 4, 6, 8, 11, 12)</p><p>Type material. Holotype: INDONESIA: ♂, two white typed labels: "Sumatra, Babahrot", "lg.Klapperich, Juli–Aug.1983 " [last digit typed as 5 and overtyped with 3], yellow label with handwritten " Neseuthia sumatrana m." and printed " PARATYPUS ", red printed label " CEPHENNOMICRUS fesumatranus m., det. P. JAŁOSZYŃSKI, 2008)" (NHMW).</p><p>Diagnosis. This species differs from all similar congeners in having the following combination of characters: body very small, covered with extremely short but dense vestiture; head of male with shallow broadly V-shaped impression separating vertex from frontoclypeal area; median part of head raised and indistinctly separated from slightly impressed sides; base of pronotum with narrow transverse groove joining three small foveae (in middle and at each end), and with additional small lateral fovea on each side; elytra with fine, dense and relatively smooth microgranulation, with indistinct rows of granules, oblique in relation to suture. Identification must be confirmed by examination of aedeagus.</p><p>Description. BL 0.72. Body of male (Figs. 2, 4) with well marked constriction between pronotum and elytra, moderately slender and strongly convex, light brown, covered with barely noticeable vestiture similar in color to cuticle.</p><p>Head large, HL 0.10, HW 0.17, vertex convex, separated from frontoclypeal area by shallow and relatively broad V-shaped impression running from upper internal margin of each eye toward middle; median part of frontoclypeal area just anterior to tip of impression forms broad, subquadrate convexity delimited at each side by shallow but distinct impression; eyes large, coarsely faceted, moderately convex. Punctures on head extremely fine, barely noticeable at magnification 80x; setae extremely short, dense, recumbent. Antennae as in Fig. 6, AnL 0.27.</p><p>Pronotum (Fig. 4) subquadrate, broadest near anterior third, PL 0.22, PW 0.27; anterior margin broadly rounded; sides strongly rounded in anterior third, then slightly constricted between middle and posterior third, distinctly convergent toward blunt and obtuse hind angles; posterior margin nearly straight; five small antebasal foveae present, three median foveae connected by narrow and distinct transverse groove. Punctures extremely fine, dense, barely noticeable at magnification 80x, surface of pronotum relatively glossy; setae extremely short, dense and recumbent.</p><p>Elytra (Fig. 4) oval, slightly more convex than pronotum and distinctly broader, broadest minimally anterior to middle, EL 0.40, EW 0.32, EI 1.25; each elytron with very small but well visible basal fovea; humeral calli well marked; humeral denticles indistinct; apices of elytra rounded together. Surface of elytra with very fine, dense and smooth microgranulation, granules form slant rows running from suture toward sides and posteriorly; setation as that on pronotum. Hind wings not studied.</p><p>Legs (Fig. 8) slender, relatively short.</p><p>Ventral view as in Fig. 8; metaventrite not modified.</p><p>Aedeagus (Figs. 11, 12) stout, bottle-shaped, AeL 0.12; apex subtriangular, blunt, slightly curved dorsally; internal armature composed of narrow median tubule surrounded at each side by lightly sclerotized, elongate subtriangular and pointed structure; parameres broad, each with one apical and one subapical seta.</p><p>Female. Unknown.</p><p>Distribution. Sumatra.</p><p>Etymology. The specific epithet is composed of the locotypical adjective " sumatranus ", by analogy to L. sumatranus, and a combination of two letters " fe- ", which is an abbreviation of " Franz erravit ", meaning "Franz has made a mistake". Despite a clearly different morphology, this species was misidentified by Herbert Franz as N. sumatrana .</p><p>Remarks. In addition to the unique shape of the aedeagus (a primary specific character in all Cephenniini) this species differs from all known congeners in an unusual sculpture of the elytra, which are covered not with punctures but rather with very fine, dense and smooth granules that tend to form oblique rows. This sculpture is slightly similar to that known in many Leiodidae, while the elytra of Cephennomicrus are typically punctate.</p><p>In the original description Franz (1984) stated that the paratype of Neseuthia sumatrana has been collected in Pulau Kayu. However, the paratype locality label is identical to that of the holotype of N. sumatrana, i.e. "Sumatra, Babahrot".</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6D5D87B9FFFBFFEEA4F10EC0FDBBC835	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Jałoszyński, Paweł	Jałoszyński, Paweł (2010): Notes on identity of Cephennomicrus sumatranus (Franz) (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Scydmaeninae). Zootaxa 2517: 25-32, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.196159
