taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
6C43E460F73CD529FF419690CF7D50FA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3243048/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3243048	Fig. 1. A. Canthidium gigas Balthasar, 1939, hypomerum with complete hypomeral carina. B. Canthidium kelleri (Martínez et al., 1964), hypomerum with incomplete hypomeral carina. C. Disc of pronotum completely punctated. D. Disc of pronotum with indefinite punctation. Not to scale.	Fig. 1. A. Canthidium gigas Balthasar, 1939, hypomerum with complete hypomeral carina. B. Canthidium kelleri (Martínez et al., 1964), hypomerum with incomplete hypomeral carina. C. Disc of pronotum completely punctated. D. Disc of pronotum with indefinite punctation. Not to scale.	2019-06-06	Carvalho De Santana, Edrielly C.;Pacheco, Thaynara L.;Vaz-De, Fernando Z.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho De Santana, Edrielly C.;Pacheco, Thaynara L.;Vaz-De, Fernando Z.			
6C43E460F73CD529FF419690CF7D50FA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3243050/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3243050	Fig. 2. Canthidium gigas Balthasar, 1939. A. Dorsal view. B. Ventral view. C. Dorsal view of aedeagus. D. Lateral view of aedeagus. Scale bars: 1 mm.	Fig. 2. Canthidium gigas Balthasar, 1939. A. Dorsal view. B. Ventral view. C. Dorsal view of aedeagus. D. Lateral view of aedeagus. Scale bars: 1 mm.	2019-06-06	Carvalho De Santana, Edrielly C.;Pacheco, Thaynara L.;Vaz-De, Fernando Z.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho De Santana, Edrielly C.;Pacheco, Thaynara L.;Vaz-De, Fernando Z.			
6C43E460F73CD529FF419690CF7D50FA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3243052/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3243052	Fig. 3. Canthidium bokermanni (Martínez et al., 1964). A. Dorsal view. B. Lateral view of aedeagus. C. Dorsal view of aedeagus. Scale bars: 1 mm.	Fig. 3. Canthidium bokermanni (Martínez et al., 1964). A. Dorsal view. B. Lateral view of aedeagus. C. Dorsal view of aedeagus. Scale bars: 1 mm.	2019-06-06	Carvalho De Santana, Edrielly C.;Pacheco, Thaynara L.;Vaz-De, Fernando Z.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho De Santana, Edrielly C.;Pacheco, Thaynara L.;Vaz-De, Fernando Z.			
6C43E460F739D528FDE69773CB3E51E7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3243054/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3243054	Fig. 4. Canthidium ayri sp. nov., holotype (CEMT) A. Dorsal view. B. Lateral view of aedeagus. C. Dorsal view of aedeagus. Scale bars: 1 mm.	Fig. 4. Canthidium ayri sp. nov., holotype (CEMT) A. Dorsal view. B. Lateral view of aedeagus. C. Dorsal view of aedeagus. Scale bars: 1 mm.	2019-06-06	Carvalho De Santana, Edrielly C.;Pacheco, Thaynara L.;Vaz-De, Fernando Z.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho De Santana, Edrielly C.;Pacheco, Thaynara L.;Vaz-De, Fernando Z.			
6C43E460F739D528FDE69773CB3E51E7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3243062/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3243062	Fig. 8. Geographical distribution of Canthidium kelleri (Martínez et al., 1964) (circles) and Canthidium ayri sp. nov. (triangles).	Fig. 8. Geographical distribution of Canthidium kelleri (Martínez et al., 1964) (circles) and Canthidium ayri sp. nov. (triangles).	2019-06-06	Carvalho De Santana, Edrielly C.;Pacheco, Thaynara L.;Vaz-De, Fernando Z.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho De Santana, Edrielly C.;Pacheco, Thaynara L.;Vaz-De, Fernando Z.			
6C43E460F737D525FE48956CCEB25144.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3243048/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3243048	Fig. 1. A. Canthidium gigas Balthasar, 1939, hypomerum with complete hypomeral carina. B. Canthidium kelleri (Martínez et al., 1964), hypomerum with incomplete hypomeral carina. C. Disc of pronotum completely punctated. D. Disc of pronotum with indefinite punctation. Not to scale.	Fig. 1. A. Canthidium gigas Balthasar, 1939, hypomerum with complete hypomeral carina. B. Canthidium kelleri (Martínez et al., 1964), hypomerum with incomplete hypomeral carina. C. Disc of pronotum completely punctated. D. Disc of pronotum with indefinite punctation. Not to scale.	2019-06-06	Carvalho De Santana, Edrielly C.;Pacheco, Thaynara L.;Vaz-De, Fernando Z.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho De Santana, Edrielly C.;Pacheco, Thaynara L.;Vaz-De, Fernando Z.			
6C43E460F737D525FE48956CCEB25144.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3243056/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3243056	Fig. 5. Canthidium kelleri (Martínez et al., 1964). A. Dorsal view. B. Lateral view of aedeagus. C. Dorsal view of aedeagus. Scale bars: 1 mm.	Fig. 5. Canthidium kelleri (Martínez et al., 1964). A. Dorsal view. B. Lateral view of aedeagus. C. Dorsal view of aedeagus. Scale bars: 1 mm.	2019-06-06	Carvalho De Santana, Edrielly C.;Pacheco, Thaynara L.;Vaz-De, Fernando Z.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho De Santana, Edrielly C.;Pacheco, Thaynara L.;Vaz-De, Fernando Z.			
6C43E460F737D525FE48956CCEB25144.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3243062/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3243062	Fig. 8. Geographical distribution of Canthidium kelleri (Martínez et al., 1964) (circles) and Canthidium ayri sp. nov. (triangles).	Fig. 8. Geographical distribution of Canthidium kelleri (Martínez et al., 1964) (circles) and Canthidium ayri sp. nov. (triangles).	2019-06-06	Carvalho De Santana, Edrielly C.;Pacheco, Thaynara L.;Vaz-De, Fernando Z.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho De Santana, Edrielly C.;Pacheco, Thaynara L.;Vaz-De, Fernando Z.			
6C43E460F735D523FDEA973ECBF55383.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3243048/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3243048	Fig. 1. A. Canthidium gigas Balthasar, 1939, hypomerum with complete hypomeral carina. B. Canthidium kelleri (Martínez et al., 1964), hypomerum with incomplete hypomeral carina. C. Disc of pronotum completely punctated. D. Disc of pronotum with indefinite punctation. Not to scale.	Fig. 1. A. Canthidium gigas Balthasar, 1939, hypomerum with complete hypomeral carina. B. Canthidium kelleri (Martínez et al., 1964), hypomerum with incomplete hypomeral carina. C. Disc of pronotum completely punctated. D. Disc of pronotum with indefinite punctation. Not to scale.	2019-06-06	Carvalho De Santana, Edrielly C.;Pacheco, Thaynara L.;Vaz-De, Fernando Z.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho De Santana, Edrielly C.;Pacheco, Thaynara L.;Vaz-De, Fernando Z.			
6C43E460F735D523FDEA973ECBF55383.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3243058/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3243058	Fig. 6. Canthidium feeri sp. nov., holotype (CEMT) A. Dorsal view. B. Lateral view of aedeagus. C. Dorsal view of aedeagus. Scale bars: 1 mm.	Fig. 6. Canthidium feeri sp. nov., holotype (CEMT) A. Dorsal view. B. Lateral view of aedeagus. C. Dorsal view of aedeagus. Scale bars: 1 mm.	2019-06-06	Carvalho De Santana, Edrielly C.;Pacheco, Thaynara L.;Vaz-De, Fernando Z.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho De Santana, Edrielly C.;Pacheco, Thaynara L.;Vaz-De, Fernando Z.			
6C43E460F735D523FDEA973ECBF55383.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3243064/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3243064	Fig. 9. Geographical distribution of Canthidium stofeli sp. nov. (circles) and Canthidium feeri sp. nov. (triangles)..	Fig. 9. Geographical distribution of Canthidium stofeli sp. nov. (circles) and Canthidium feeri sp. nov. (triangles)..	2019-06-06	Carvalho De Santana, Edrielly C.;Pacheco, Thaynara L.;Vaz-De, Fernando Z.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho De Santana, Edrielly C.;Pacheco, Thaynara L.;Vaz-De, Fernando Z.			
6C43E460F733D521FDF19673C93B5182.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3243060/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3243060	Fig. 7. Canthidium stofeli sp. nov., holotype (CEMT) A. Dorsal view. B. Lateral view of aedeagus. C. Dorsal view of aedeagus. Scale bars: 1 mm.	Fig. 7. Canthidium stofeli sp. nov., holotype (CEMT) A. Dorsal view. B. Lateral view of aedeagus. C. Dorsal view of aedeagus. Scale bars: 1 mm.	2019-06-06	Carvalho De Santana, Edrielly C.;Pacheco, Thaynara L.;Vaz-De, Fernando Z.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho De Santana, Edrielly C.;Pacheco, Thaynara L.;Vaz-De, Fernando Z.			
6C43E460F733D521FDF19673C93B5182.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3243064/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3243064	Fig. 9. Geographical distribution of Canthidium stofeli sp. nov. (circles) and Canthidium feeri sp. nov. (triangles)..	Fig. 9. Geographical distribution of Canthidium stofeli sp. nov. (circles) and Canthidium feeri sp. nov. (triangles)..	2019-06-06	Carvalho De Santana, Edrielly C.;Pacheco, Thaynara L.;Vaz-De, Fernando Z.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho De Santana, Edrielly C.;Pacheco, Thaynara L.;Vaz-De, Fernando Z.			
6C43E460F731D53DFE1F9073C9D45332.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3243048/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3243048	Fig. 1. A. Canthidium gigas Balthasar, 1939, hypomerum with complete hypomeral carina. B. Canthidium kelleri (Martínez et al., 1964), hypomerum with incomplete hypomeral carina. C. Disc of pronotum completely punctated. D. Disc of pronotum with indefinite punctation. Not to scale.	Fig. 1. A. Canthidium gigas Balthasar, 1939, hypomerum with complete hypomeral carina. B. Canthidium kelleri (Martínez et al., 1964), hypomerum with incomplete hypomeral carina. C. Disc of pronotum completely punctated. D. Disc of pronotum with indefinite punctation. Not to scale.	2019-06-06	Carvalho De Santana, Edrielly C.;Pacheco, Thaynara L.;Vaz-De, Fernando Z.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho De Santana, Edrielly C.;Pacheco, Thaynara L.;Vaz-De, Fernando Z.			
6C43E460F731D53DFE1F9073C9D45332.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3243050/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3243050	Fig. 2. Canthidium gigas Balthasar, 1939. A. Dorsal view. B. Ventral view. C. Dorsal view of aedeagus. D. Lateral view of aedeagus. Scale bars: 1 mm.	Fig. 2. Canthidium gigas Balthasar, 1939. A. Dorsal view. B. Ventral view. C. Dorsal view of aedeagus. D. Lateral view of aedeagus. Scale bars: 1 mm.	2019-06-06	Carvalho De Santana, Edrielly C.;Pacheco, Thaynara L.;Vaz-De, Fernando Z.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho De Santana, Edrielly C.;Pacheco, Thaynara L.;Vaz-De, Fernando Z.			
6C43E460F731D53DFE1F9073C9D45332.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3243066/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3243066	Fig. 10. Geographical distribution of Canthidium gigas Balthasar, 1939 (circles) and Canthidium bokermanni (Martínez et al., 1964) (triangles)..	Fig. 10. Geographical distribution of Canthidium gigas Balthasar, 1939 (circles) and Canthidium bokermanni (Martínez et al., 1964) (triangles)..	2019-06-06	Carvalho De Santana, Edrielly C.;Pacheco, Thaynara L.;Vaz-De, Fernando Z.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho De Santana, Edrielly C.;Pacheco, Thaynara L.;Vaz-De, Fernando Z.			
6C43E460F72DD53BFE6D95C3CE56532F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3243052/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3243052	Fig. 3. Canthidium bokermanni (Martínez et al., 1964). A. Dorsal view. B. Lateral view of aedeagus. C. Dorsal view of aedeagus. Scale bars: 1 mm.	Fig. 3. Canthidium bokermanni (Martínez et al., 1964). A. Dorsal view. B. Lateral view of aedeagus. C. Dorsal view of aedeagus. Scale bars: 1 mm.	2019-06-06	Carvalho De Santana, Edrielly C.;Pacheco, Thaynara L.;Vaz-De, Fernando Z.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho De Santana, Edrielly C.;Pacheco, Thaynara L.;Vaz-De, Fernando Z.			
6C43E460F72DD53BFE6D95C3CE56532F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/3243066/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3243066	Fig. 10. Geographical distribution of Canthidium gigas Balthasar, 1939 (circles) and Canthidium bokermanni (Martínez et al., 1964) (triangles)..	Fig. 10. Geographical distribution of Canthidium gigas Balthasar, 1939 (circles) and Canthidium bokermanni (Martínez et al., 1964) (triangles)..	2019-06-06	Carvalho De Santana, Edrielly C.;Pacheco, Thaynara L.;Vaz-De, Fernando Z.		Zenodo	biologists	Carvalho De Santana, Edrielly C.;Pacheco, Thaynara L.;Vaz-De, Fernando Z.			
