taxonID	type	description	language	source
5FFCBB6DBB7D57FAA770F1308B65EECC.taxon	etymology	Etymology. Genus name masculine from the free combination of the latin word ' rete ' meaning network as for the reticulated forewings and the suffix ' - aldar ' from the genus Euxaldar Fennah, 1978.	en	Zhao, Songping, Bourgoin, Thierry, Wang, Menglin (2019): The impact of a new genus on the molecular phylogeny of Hemisphaeriini (Hemiptera, Fulgoromorpha, Issidae). ZooKeys 880: 61-74, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.880.36828, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.880.36828
5FFCBB6DBB7D57FAA770F1308B65EECC.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. This new genus is similar to the genus Clypeosmilus Gnezdilov & Soulier-Perkins, 2017 in general appearance, but differs by: 1) a more complex and obscure reticular venation of the forewing (Fig. 1) while a simpler pattern is found in Clypeosmilus (Gnezdilov and Soulier-Perkins 2017, fig. 1 A); 2) an asymmetrical male genitalia with the periandrium more developed on right side and the aedeagus processes emerging at different levels, more posteriorly on right side (Figs 9, 10) while it is symmetrical in Clypeosmilus (Gnezdilov and Soulier-Perkins 2017, fig. 3 A); 3) gonostyli with ventral margin deeply convex (Fig. 8), while it is much more elongated in Clypeosmilus (Gnezdilov and Soulier-Perkins 2017, fig. 3 C). The new genus is also similar to the genus Eusudasina Yang, 1994, from which it differs also by its more complex reticulate venation and by its longer frons, around 1.2 times longer (in middle) than broad at widest part (Figs 3, 21), only around 0.9 times longer in Eusudasina (Chan and Yang 1994, fig. 34 C). With Euxaldar Fennah, 1978, Retaldar gen. nov. shares the general form of the gonostyli, which is strongly developed ventrally (Fennah 1978, fig. 251; Gnezdilov et al. 2017, fig. 8) but definitively differs by its distal postero-ventral protuberance (Fig. 8) and by its near-symmetric subapical processes on the periandrium (Figs 9, 10) while they are asymmetrical in the former (Gnezdilov et al. 2017, figs 1, 2).	en	Zhao, Songping, Bourgoin, Thierry, Wang, Menglin (2019): The impact of a new genus on the molecular phylogeny of Hemisphaeriini (Hemiptera, Fulgoromorpha, Issidae). ZooKeys 880: 61-74, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.880.36828, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.880.36828
5FFCBB6DBB7D57FAA770F1308B65EECC.taxon	description	Description. Head with compound eyes slightly wider than pronotum, almost same width as mesonotum (Fig. 1). Vertex rectangular, obviously broader than long at midline, anterior margin almost straight, lateral margins nearly parallel, posterior margin slightly roundly concave at middle; median carina absent on disc (Fig. 1). Frons obviously longer than wide, gradually broadening from dorsal margin to below the level of antennae, then curved to frontoclypeal suture (Figs 3, 21); dorsal margin slightly concave, lateral margins slightly broaden below level of compound eyes, median carina nearly invisible. Frons with numerous tiny tubercles on the whole disc. The tubercles larger on the lateral areas, arranged into a vertical line on each side of frons (Figs 3, 21). Frontoclypeal suture straight (Figs 3, 21). Gena in lateral view flattened and oblique (Fig. 2). Clypeus in lateral view with a protuberance below frontoclypeal suture slightly surpassing the gena (Fig. 2); in ventral view, clypeus without median carina (Figs 3, 21). Rostrum reaching midcoxae; apical segment slightly shorter than subapical one. Antennae with scape extremely short, pedicel rounded (Figs 3, 21). Pronotum triangular, apical margin roundly convex, posterior margin nearly straight, with some faint small nodules on each side or nodules invisible, median carina absent (Figs 1, 19, 20). Mesonotum triangular, a little longer than pronotum in midline, without carina on the disc; with (Fig. 1) or without (Figs 19, 20) some faint small nodules in lateral part apically. Forewings obviously longer than broad, without hypocostal plate, with elevated irregular reticular venations and venation poorly recognizable, costal margin and posterior margin subparallel, costal margin roundly convex, apical margin straight and oblique inward to posterior margin (Fig. 4), CuP obvious, Pcu and A 1 fused exceeding middle of clavus (Figs 1, 4). Hindwing one-lobed. Metatibia with two lateral spines on apical half and seven spines apically.	en	Zhao, Songping, Bourgoin, Thierry, Wang, Menglin (2019): The impact of a new genus on the molecular phylogeny of Hemisphaeriini (Hemiptera, Fulgoromorpha, Issidae). ZooKeys 880: 61-74, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.880.36828, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.880.36828
5FFCBB6DBB7D57FAA770F1308B65EECC.taxon	distribution	Distribution. China (Guangxi).	en	Zhao, Songping, Bourgoin, Thierry, Wang, Menglin (2019): The impact of a new genus on the molecular phylogeny of Hemisphaeriini (Hemiptera, Fulgoromorpha, Issidae). ZooKeys 880: 61-74, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.880.36828, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.880.36828
EDF1FBE6D0D451B8989C75E939119C03.taxon	etymology	Etymology. Specific epithet built by the arbitrary combination of the alphabet letter " Y " and " anal tube " latinised into " anitubus ", referring to the Y-shaped male anal tube in dorsal view.	en	Zhao, Songping, Bourgoin, Thierry, Wang, Menglin (2019): The impact of a new genus on the molecular phylogeny of Hemisphaeriini (Hemiptera, Fulgoromorpha, Issidae). ZooKeys 880: 61-74, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.880.36828, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.880.36828
EDF1FBE6D0D451B8989C75E939119C03.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. The species is close to Clypeosmilus centrodasus Gnezdilov & Soulier-Perkins, 2017, from which it differs by its generic characters (complex reticular venation (Fig. 1), more or less quadrangular gonostyli bearing a postero-apical protuberance) and the form of the male anal tube, which is deeply concave on the apical margin, Y-shaped in dorsal view (Fig. 7), while very shallowly concave and cylindrical in the latter species (Gnezdilov and Soulier-Perkins 2017, fig. 3 E). From Euxaldar guangxiensis Zhang, Chang & Chen, 2018, another Guangxi species, it differs by: 1) its tegmina pattern black (Fig. 19) to dark tawny with a yellow slender or broader transverse marking (Figs 1, 4, 20), while it is dark brown with more than four yellow irregular markings in E. guangxiensis (Zhang et al. 2018, figs 1, 3); 2) the form of the male anal tube which is obviously protruded in the later (Zhang et al. 2018, fig. 10), and 3) the base of periandrium with a finger-shaped dorsal process (Figs 9, 10), while it is with three dorsal processes in E. guangxiensis (Zhang et al. 2018, figs 15 a, b, 16 a, b).	en	Zhao, Songping, Bourgoin, Thierry, Wang, Menglin (2019): The impact of a new genus on the molecular phylogeny of Hemisphaeriini (Hemiptera, Fulgoromorpha, Issidae). ZooKeys 880: 61-74, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.880.36828, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.880.36828
EDF1FBE6D0D451B8989C75E939119C03.taxon	description	Description. Length: male (including forewings) (N = 1): 3.1 mm; female (including forewings) (N = 2): 3.3 - 3.4 mm.	en	Zhao, Songping, Bourgoin, Thierry, Wang, Menglin (2019): The impact of a new genus on the molecular phylogeny of Hemisphaeriini (Hemiptera, Fulgoromorpha, Issidae). ZooKeys 880: 61-74, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.880.36828, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.880.36828
