identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
742B87A5FFE1FFF0FC4D36033640F89F.text	742B87A5FFE1FFF0FC4D36033640F89F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Scinax fuscomarginatus (Lutz 1925)	<div><p>SCINAX FUSCOMARGINATUS (LUTZ, 1925) REDESCRIPTION (FIGS 4A, 5A, 6A)</p><p>Hyla fuscomarginata Lutz, 1925</p><p>Hyla parkeri Gaige, 1929 syn. nov.</p><p>Ololygon fuscomarginata – Fouquette &amp; Delahoussaye, 1977</p><p>Ololygon parkeri – Fouquette &amp; Delahoussaye, 1977 syn. nov.</p><p>Ololygon trilineata Hoogmoed &amp; Gorzula, 1979 syn. nov.</p><p>Scinax fuscomarginata – Duellman &amp; Wiens, 1992</p><p>Scinax trilineata – Duellman &amp; Wiens, 1992 syn. nov.</p><p>Scinax parkeri – Duellman &amp; Wiens, 1992 syn. nov.</p><p>Scinax fuscomarginatus – Köhler &amp; Böhme, 1996</p><p>Scinax trilineatus – Köhler &amp; Böhme, 1996 syn. nov.</p><p>Scinax lutzorum Cardoso &amp; Pombal, 2010 syn. nov.</p><p>Scinax pusillus Pombal, Bilate, Gambale, Signorelli &amp; Bastos, 2011 syn. nov.</p><p>Lectotype: AL-MN 845 designated by Cardoso &amp; Pombal (2010). Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil, collect- ed by A. Lutz and J. Venâncio in November 1924 (specimen examined).</p><p>Paralectotypes: AL-MN 847–850 (specimens examined) and USNM 96964 (pictures) designated by Cardoso &amp; Pombal (2010). Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil, collected by A. Lutz in November 1924 .</p><p>Diagnosis: Scinax fuscomarginatus is distinguished from all other species in the genus by the following combination of characters: (1) small size in males (SVL 15.7–26.7 mm); (2) subelliptical snout in dorsal view; (3) head longer than wide; (4) dorsal pattern with continuous divergent or parallel brown dorsolateral stripes on a light brown background; (5) uniform light brown colour on posterior surfaces of thighs; (6) immaculate or finely pointed chest and belly; (7) longitudinal dark stripes on forearm and shank external surface; (8) loreal region steep sloping toward lip; (9) diagonal stripes on dorsal surface of shank.</p><p>Redescription: Based on the lectotype (ALMN 845) and material from Lagoa Santa, Minas Gerais, 35 km from the type locality (CFBH 24356-64). A slender, smallsized frog (males SVL 20.2–21.8 mm), body width equal to head. Snout subelliptical in dorsal view and protruding in profile. Head longer than wide (HW /HL 0.84). Nostrils protuberant, dorsolaterally located, IND 67% of IOD. Canthus rostralis rounded. Loreal region concave and steep sloping toward lip. Eye large, protuberant, 98% of IOD. Tympanum slightly distinct, small; tympanic annulus rounded with superior portion hidden by supratympanic fold. Supratympanic fold distinct from posterior corner of eye to arm insertion. In mouth corner a row of a variable number of tubercles with the first one bigger than the others. Vocal sac large, single, subgular, expanded externally, evident by the presence of loose skin with longitudinal folds, laterally reaching posterior region of mouth corner and ventrally the level of pectoral fold. Tongue ovoid, with lateral and posterior borders free, shallow notch in posterior region. Vocal slit longitudinal, from mediolateral portion of tongue to jaw angle. Vomerine dentigerous processes located medial and posterior to choanae, without contact between them, four to nine teeth each; choanae oval, slightly diagonal to sagittal axis .</p><p>Arm more slender than forearm. Row of unpigmented flat tubercles in external surface of forearm. Fingers short; finger discs elliptical, wider than long, disc of finger I markedly smaller than the others; webbing reduced to a fringed in proximal and distal margins of fingers II and III, absent in the others. Ulnar ridge present. Palmar tubercle bifid. Subarticular tubercles of fingers I and II conical, of finger III rounded, and of finger IV with distal margin truncated. Thenar tubercle large, occupying much of the base of finger I; a pad between subarticular tubercle of finger I and palmar tubercle. Unpigmented nuptial pad occupying posterior region of the base of finger I and posterodorsal region until distal margin of subarticular tubercle. Supernumerary tubercles rounded. Hind limbs slender, shank 51% and thigh 43% of SVL. A row of unpigmented flat tubercles on external surface of tarsus. Toes slender. Elliptical discs, wider than long, those of toes I and II smaller than the others. Inner metatarsal tubercle oval. Outer metatarsal tubercle rounded, half the size of inner metatarsal tubercle, located with proximal margin at the level of distal margin of inner metatarsal tubercle or slightly passing it. A cutaneous ridge on proximal margin of toe I from inner metatarsal tubercle to subarticular tubercle. Cutaneous ridge on external margin of the base of toe V. Supernumerary tubercles rounded, located at the base of toes. Webbing formula I 2–2 II 11/2 –2 III 1 or 11/2 –2 IV 2–1 or 11/2 V. Tarsal fold absent.</p><p>Preaxillar pectoral fold distinct. Dorsolateral region of body, dorsal region of head, upper eyelid, and dorsal region of hind limbs covered with rounded pustules; gular region smooth; chest and belly granular; ventral surface of thighs shagreen.</p><p>Colour in preservative: General colour light brown with continuous dark brown dorsolateral stripe from upper eyelid to inguinal region, where it is more diffuse; considering the pair of stripes, they are divergent; supratympanic fold with same coloration as dorsolateral stripe; between dorsolateral stripe and inferior border of tympanum level a wide, light brown stripe (with lower chromatophore density than dorsolateral stripe); from supratympanic fold to inguinal region, tympanic membrane of same colour as adjacent region (sometimes with slightly lower chromatophore density); dark brown stripe on canthus rostralis; loreal region with scattered chromatophores, at lowest density on the upper lip; between eye and upper lip only a few chromatophores or absence of them; a median line from internostril region to sacral region, wider between eyes and nostrils, in the portion between eyes, in median region of dorsum, and in sacral region; a wide, dark brown transversal interocular stripe; finger discs darkly pigmented, dorsal surface of hands with dark brown dots and transversal stripes on fingers III and IV, like those on forearms. A longitudinal dark brown stripe on external margin of finger IV to elbow; dorsal surface of legs with diagonal dark brown stripes, with one on heel and three on shank; external surface of thigh and tarsus with a longitudinal dark brown stripe; ventrally, external borders of the gula, shoulders, and borders of belly finely spotted, immaculate on rest of belly and chest; hidden and posterior parts of thigh and inguinal region uniform light brown.</p><p>Variation: Measurements and body proportions are given in Table 2. All of the analysed specimens show a subelliptical snout in dorsal view but with some variation related to the tip shape, ranging from rounded to slightly pointed tips. We found great variation in the development of toe webbing, mainly between toes II and III. Small specimens (SVL &lt;17 mm) show a trend for less developed toe webbing. The webbing formula ranges from I 2–2 II 11/2 –2 III 1–2 IV 2–1 V to I 2–2 II 2–3 III 11/2 –3 IV 3– 11/2 V. The dorsal pattern varies with respect to the median line, interocular stripe, and dorsolateral stripe (see intrapopulational variation in Fig. 7). Some individuals have a longitudinal marbled stripe on the dorsal shank surface instead of diagonal stripes. In general, darker individuals have the lateral part of the body more spotted, finely dotted on chest and in some cases with dark brown pigmentation between the glands that form the nuptial pad. The longitudinal dark stripe on the external surface of the shank is present in a great percentage of our sample (91%). Most of the specimens that do not present the longitudinal stripe are noticeably faded.</p><p>Advertisement call: The advertisement call of S. fuscomarginatus has been described in several works and from different localities (Duellman &amp; Pyles, 1983; De la Riva et al., 1994; Pombal, Bastos &amp; Haddad, 1995a; Toledo &amp; Haddad, 2005a; Pombal et al., 2011). All variation is given in Table 3. The advertisement call of S. fuscomarginatus (N = 56 males) is constitut- ed by a single multipulsed note with modulated frequency. On average, note duration is 0.54 s (SD = 0.20; range = 0.27−0.92), dominant frequency is 3776.10 Hz (SD = 325.04; range = 2960.40–4593.80), and pulse rate is 172.49 pulses/s (SD = 23.22; range = 113.42– 271.74).</p><p>Comparisons: Males of S. fuscomarginatus have a smaller body size (SVL 15.7–26.7 mm) compared with males of the following species: S. acuminatus (SVL 39–45 mm; Lutz, 1973), Scinax boesemani (Goin, 1966) (28.4–31.8 mm; Duellman, 1986), Scinax camposseabrai (Bokermann, 1968) (SVL 28.9–33.5 mm; Caramaschi &amp; Cardoso, 2006), Scinax castroviejoi De la Riva, 1993 (SVL 41.9 mm; De la Riva, 1993), Scinax chiquitanus (De la Riva, 1990) (SVL 33.3 mm; De la Riva, 1990), Scinax dolloi (Werner, 1903) (SVL 34.9 mm; Pugliese, Baêta &amp; Pombal, 2009), Scinax eurydice (Bokermann, 1968) (SVL 44– 52 mm; Bokermann, 1968), Scinax funereus (Cope, 1874) (SVL 28.7–35.1 mm; Duellman, 1971), Scinax fuscovarius (Lutz, 1925) (SVL 41–44 mm; Cei, 1980), Scinax hayii (Barbour, 1909) (SVL 39–43 mm; Heyer et al., 1990), Scinax iquitorum Moravec et al., 2009 (35 mm; Moravec et al., 2009), Scinax manriquei Barrio-Amorós, Orellana &amp; Chacón-Ortiz, 2004 (SVL 27.7 mm; Barrio-Amorós et al., 2004), Scinax perereca Pombal, Haddad &amp; Kasahara, 1995b (SVL 34–38.5 mm; Pombal et al., 1995b), Scinax similis (SVL 29.4–34.7 mm; Caramaschi &amp; Cardoso, 2006), and Scinax x-signatus (Spix, 1824) (SVL 29.1–39.1 mm; Caramaschi &amp; Cardoso, 2006).</p><p>By its uniform light brown colour on the posterior surfaces of the thigh, S. fuscomarginatus can be differentiated from Scinax caldarum (Lutz, 1968), Scinax cardosoi (Carvalho-e-Silva &amp; Peixoto, 1991), Scinax curicica Pugliese, Pombal &amp; Sazima, 2004, Scinax duartei (Lutz, 1951), Scinax granulatus (Peters, 1871), Scinax hayii, Scinax maracaya (Cardoso &amp; Sazima, 1980), Scinax nasicus, S. similis (all with yellow flash colour on posterior surface of thigh), and Scinax rogerioi Pugliese et al., 2009 (brown spots on posterior surface of thigh; Pugliese et al., 2009).</p><p>By its dorsal pattern with a continuous brown dorsolateral stripe from the upper eyelid to the inguinal region S. fuscomarginatus differs from S. acuminatus, Scinax baumgardneri (Rivero, 1961) (Duellman, 1986), S. boesemani (Duellman, 1986), Scinax cabralensis Drummond, Baêta &amp; Pires, 2007 (Drummond et al., 2007), S. camposseabrai, Scinax crospedospilus (Lutz, 1925), Scinax danae (Duellman, 1986), S. eurydice, Scinax lindsayi Pyburn, 1992 (Pyburn, 1992), S. maracaya (all without dorsolateral stripe); from S. alter, Scinax auratus (Wied-Neuwied, 1821), Scinax ED, eye diameter, measured horizontally; EN, eye−nostril distance, from distal corner of orbit to proximal margin of external nostril; ESD, eye−snout distance, from tip of the snout to distal corner of the eye; FAL, forearm length, from elbow to the proximal margin of the thenar tubercle; HL, head length; HW, head width; IND, internostril distance, between the interior margins of the nostrils; IOD, interorbital distance; SHL, shank length; SVL, snout−vent length; TAL, tarsus length, from the tibiotarsal articulation to the proximal margin of the internal tarsal tubercle; TD, tympanum diameter, measured horizontally; THL, thigh length.</p><p>cretatus Nunes &amp; Pombal, 2011 (Nunes &amp; Pombal, 2011), Scinax exiguus (Duellman, 1986), S. squalirostris, Scinax wandae (Pyburn &amp; Fouquette, 1971) (all with dorsolateral light stripe); from S. caldarum and S. duartei (with dorsal stripe from between eyes and connected with a interocular blotch); from Scinax pachycrus (Miranda-Ribeiro, 1937) (with a lateral dark subcantal stripe from corner of eye to inguinal region); from Scinax cuspidatus (Lutz, 1925) (with irregular stripe or inverted parenthesis on thoracic region; Lutz, 1973); and from S. cruentommus (with irregular longitudinal marks; Duellman, 1972).</p><p>From the most similar species S. madeirae and Scinax villasboasi sp. nov., S. fuscomarginatus differs by its subelliptical snout in dorsal view (rounded in S. madeirae and S. villasboasi sp. nov.); head much longer than wide (head nearly as wide as long in S. madeirae and S. villasboasi sp. nov.); loreal region steep sloping toward lip (softly in S. madeirae and S. villasboasi sp. nov.); longitudinal dark stripe on external surface of shank (absent in S. madeirae and S. villasboasi sp. nov.; Fig. 8); oblique stripes on dorsal surface of shank (transversal in S. madeirae and in S. villasboasi sp. nov.; Fig. 9). Scinax fuscomarginatus differs from S. madeirae by an unpigmented or finely spotted area on upper lip (strongly spotted, forming patches in S. madeirae; Fig. 10); lateral part of body immaculate or finely spotted (strongly spotted in S. madeirae; Fig. 10); and dorsolateral stripes divergent or parallel (convergent in S. madeirae).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/742B87A5FFE1FFF0FC4D36033640F89F	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Brusquetti, Francisco;Jansen, Martin;Barrio-Amorós, César;Segalla, Magno;Haddad, Célio F. B.	Brusquetti, Francisco, Jansen, Martin, Barrio-Amorós, César, Segalla, Magno, Haddad, Célio F. B. (2014): Taxonomic review of Scinax fuscomarginatus (Lutz, 1925) and related species (Anura; Hylidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 171 (4): 783-821, DOI: 10.1111/zoj.12148, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/zoj.12148
742B87A5FFFDFFF8FEE133FA3003FCA0.text	742B87A5FFFDFFF8FEE133FA3003FCA0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Scinax villasboasi Brusquetti & Jansen & Barrio-Amorós & Segalla & Haddad 2014	<div><p>SCINAX VILLASBOASI SP. NOV.</p><p>(FIGS 4C, 5C, 6C)</p><p>Holotype: CHUNB 40156. <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-55.5&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-8.583333" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -55.5/lat -8.583333)">Adult</a> male. <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-55.5&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-8.583333" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -55.5/lat -8.583333)">Campo de Provas Brigadeiro Veloso</a> (CPBV), <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-55.5&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-8.583333" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -55.5/lat -8.583333)">Serra do Cachimbo</a>, Novo Progresso, state of Pará, Brazil (8°35′S, 55°30′W). Collected in November 2004.</p><p>Paratopotypes: All adult males. CHUNB 34498−500, 34502, 34505−10 collected in October 2003. CHUNB 40157, 40159−61 collected with the holotype .</p><p>Diagnosis: Scinax villasboasi sp. nov. is distinguished from all other species in the genus by the following combination of characters: (1) small size (male SVL 16.7–20 mm); (2) rounded snout in dorsal view; (3) head nearly as wide as long; (4) dorsal pattern with continuous brown divergent dorsolateral stripes on a light brown background; (5) uniform light brown colour on posterior surface of thigh; (6) loreal region softly sloping toward lip; (7) transversal stripes on the dorsal surface of shank; (8) reduced toe webbing.</p><p>Description of the holotype: A slender, small-sized frog (SVL 19.2 mm), posterior region slightly wider than head. Head dorsally rounded, slightly longer than wide (HW/HL 0.87). Snout acuminate in profile. Nostrils dorsolaterally orientated, slightly protuberant, IND 62% of IOD. Canthus rostralis straight. Loreal region concave, softly sloping toward lip. Eye large and protruding, slightly larger than IOD. Supratympanic fold evident from posterior corner of eye to arm insertion. Tympanum evident; rounded tympanic annulus with upper portion hidden by supratympanic fold. A group of unpigmented rounded tubercles between mouth corner and terminal margin of supratympanic fold. Vocal sac large, single, subgular, externally evident. Tongue ovoid with lateral and posterior borders free. Longitudinal vocal slits extend laterally from mediolateral portion of tongue to jaw angle. Transverse and reduced oval vomerine dentigerous process between posterior margin of choanae; the processes do not contact each other; two teeth in each process; nearly rounded choanae located diagonal to sagittal axis.</p><p>Arm slightly more slender than forearm. Fingers short. Elliptical finger discs, wider than long; disc of finger I smaller than the others; webbing reduced to fringe in proximal and distal margins of fingers II, III, proximal of IV, and absent in I. Unpigmented ulnar ridge extends from distal margin of first supernumerary tubercle of finger IV to its insertion. Bifid palmar tubercle. Subarticular tubercles of fingers I and II conical and the same size; of fingers III and IV rounded but that of finger IV bigger and with the distal margin slightly free. Thenar tubercle large, occupying the base of finger I; a rounded tubercle between the subarticular tubercle of finger I and thenar tubercle. Unpigmented nuptial pad at the base of thumb, from distal margin of subarticular tubercle to the base of palmar tubercle. Supernumerary tubercles rounded. Hind limbs slender, SHL 48% and THL 43% of SVL. Toes slender. Elliptical discs wider than long; discs of toes I and II slightly smaller than the others. Inner metatarsal tubercle oval. Outer metatarsal tubercle rounded, one quarter of size of inner metatarsal tubercle, its proximal margin at the level of the distal margin of the inner metatarsal tubercle. Subarticular tubercles of toes I and II conical, rounded in the other toes. A flat, rounded tubercle between inner metatarsal tubercle and subarticular tubercle of toe I. A cutaneous ridge on the proximal margin of toe I from the subarticular tubercle to inner metatarsal tubercle. Supernumerary tubercles rounded. Webbing formula I 2–2 II 2–3 III 1 ½ –3 IV 2 ½ –1 ½ V. Tarsal fold absent.</p><p>Preaxillar pectoral fold distinct. Dorsal surface with uniformly distributed, rounded pustules; gula smooth; ventral surface of thigh shagreen; belly and chest granular.</p><p>Colour in preservative: General colour light brown with a continuous, dark brown dorsolateral stripe from upper eyelid to inguinal region, where it is more diffuse; considering the pair of stripes, they are divergent; the supratympanic fold presents the same coloration as the dorsolateral stripe; between the dorsolateral stripe and inferior border of tympanum level a wide, light brown stripe (with lower chromatophore density than the dorsolateral stripe) from supratympanic fold to inguinal region; tympanic membrane with same coloration as adjacent region; dark brown stripe on canthus rostralis reaching anterior margin of nostril; loreal region with scattered chromatophores that reduce in density towards upper lip; between eye and upper lip only a few chromatophores; median line only evident between eyes, few dots in sacral region; a wide, dark brown transversal interocular stripe; dorsal surface of finger discs dotted; dorsal surface of hands with dark brown dots and transversal stripes on fingers III and IV; three transversal stripes on dorsal surface of forearm. A longitudinal, dark brown stripe on external surface of forearm from elbow to insertion of hand; dorsal surfaces of leg with transversal, dark brown stripes, one on heel and three on shank; external surface of tarsus and foot with a intermittent, longitudinal, dark brown stripe; ventrally, external borders of the gula finely spotted, belly and chest immaculate; posterior surface of thigh uniform light brown.</p><p>Variation: The complete range of variation in measurements and body proportions is given in Table 2. Some paratypes have a inverted triangle blotch between eyes; some variation in toe webbing development, especially evident between toes II and III, with some specimens reaching the distal margin of the subarticular tubercle of toe II whereas others slightly exceed the distal margin. Some paratypes present a diffuse pattern on the upper surface of shank.</p><p>Etymology: The specific epithet is a homage to Orlando Villas Bôas (1914–2002), the older brother of Claudio (1916–1998) and Leonardo (1918–1961), three Brazilian ‘sertanistas’ [explorers] and indigenists who conducted the Roncador-Xingú expedition (1943–1949), part of the west Brazilian occupation plan named ‘Marcha para o Oeste’ [March to the West]. The work of the Villas Bôas brothers helped to create the Xingú National Park and to locate sites that were designated for the operations of the Brazilian aviation. Those sites permitted later on, the access to different localities in the Amazon Forest and its conservation, including the Serra do Cachimbo, type locality of Scinax villasboasi sp. nov.</p><p>Comparisons: By the smaller size of males (SVL 16.7– 20 mm) S. villasboasi sp. nov. differs from S. acuminatus (SVL 39–45 mm; Lutz, 1973), S. boesemani (28.4– 31.8 mm; Duellman, 1986), S. camposseabrai (SVL 28.9– 33.5 mm; Caramaschi &amp; Cardoso, 2006), S. castroviejoi (SVL 41.9 mm; De la Riva, 1993), S. chiquitanus (SVL 33.3 mm; De la Riva, 1990), S. cretatus (25.8–34.7 mm; Nunes &amp; Pombal, 2011), S. cruentommus (24.8–27.7 mm; Duellman, 1972), S. dolloi (SVL 34.9 mm; Pugliese et al., 2009), S. eurydice (SVL 44– 52 mm; Bokermann, 1968), S. funereus (SVL 28.7– 35.1 mm; Duellman, 1971), S. fuscovarius (SVL 41–44 mm; Cei, 1980), S. hayii (SVL 39–43 mm; Heyer et al., 1990), S. iquitorum (35 mm; Moravec et al., 2009), S. manriquei (SVL 27.7 mm; Barrio-Amorós et al., 2004), S. perereca (SVL 34–38.5 mm; Pombal et al., 1995b), S. rogerioi (25–35.6 mm; Pugliese et al., 2009), S. similis (SVL 29.4–34.7 mm; Caramaschi &amp; Cardoso, 2006), and S. x-signatus (SVL 29.1–39.1 mm; Caramaschi &amp; Cardoso, 2006).</p><p>By its uniform light brown colour on posterior surface of the thigh S. villasboasi sp. nov. can be differentiated from S. caldarum, S. cardosoi, S. curicica, S. duartei, S. granulatus, S. hayii, S. maracaya, S. nasicus, S. similis (all with yellow flash colour on posterior surface of thigh), and S. rogerioi (brown spots on posterior surface of thigh; Pugliese et al., 2009).</p><p>By its dorsal pattern with continuous, brown dorsolateral stripes from upper eyelids until inguinal region S. villasboasi sp. nov. differs from S. acuminatus, S. baumgardneri (Duellman, 1986), S. boesemani (Duellman, 1986), S. cabralensis (Drummond et al., 2007), S. camposseabrai, S. crospedospilus, S. danae (Duellman, 1986), S. eurydice, S. lindsayi (Pyburn, 1992), S. maracaya (all without dorsolateral stripes); from S. alter, S. auratus, S. cretatus (Nunes &amp; Pombal, 2011), S. exiguus, S. squalirostris, and S. wandae (Pyburn &amp; Fouquette, 1971) (all with dorsolateral light stripes); from S. caldarum and S. duartei (dorsal stripes from between the eyes and connected to a interocular blotch); from S. pachycrus (a lateral dark subcantal stripe from corner of eye to inguinal region); from S. cuspidatus (irregular stripes or inverted parenthesis on thoracic region; Lutz, 1973); and from S. cruentommus (irregular longitudinal marks; Duellman, 1972).</p><p>Scinax villasboasi sp. nov. differs from S. fuscomarginatus by lacking a dark stripe on external surface of shank (present in S. fuscomarginatus; Fig. 8); loreal region softly sloping toward lip (steeply sloping in S. fuscomarginatus); by its rounded snout in dorsal view (subelliptical in S. fuscomarginatus); and wider head (head much longer than wide in S. fuscomarginatus). From S. madeirae the new species differs by its divergent dorsolateral stripes (convergent in S. madeirae), and less developed interdigital webbing (I 2–2 II 2–3 III 1 ½ or 2–3 IV 3– 11/2 V) (I 2–2 II 11/2 –2 III 11/2 –2 IV 2–1 V in S. madeirae).</p><p>Distribution: The species is known from the type locality, an open formation enclave in the Serra do Cachimbo, state of Pará, eastern Brazilian Amazon.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/742B87A5FFFDFFF8FEE133FA3003FCA0	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Brusquetti, Francisco;Jansen, Martin;Barrio-Amorós, César;Segalla, Magno;Haddad, Célio F. B.	Brusquetti, Francisco, Jansen, Martin, Barrio-Amorós, César, Segalla, Magno, Haddad, Célio F. B. (2014): Taxonomic review of Scinax fuscomarginatus (Lutz, 1925) and related species (Anura; Hylidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 171 (4): 783-821, DOI: 10.1111/zoj.12148, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/zoj.12148
