taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
E1C4EBEE0A125561B70938CF7BC7E03E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/693064	https://doi.org/10.3897/fr.25.83034.figure5	Figure 5. Acerataspis? revelata (Brues, 1910), comb. nov. A. Photograph of the holotype obtained from the MCZ; B. Our interpretative drawing of the holotype; C. Photograph of the paratype obtained from the MCZ; D. Our interpretative drawing of the paratype. Thicker lines indicate outlines of body structures, thinner lines show characters inside these outlines, and dotted lines represent uncertain interpretations.	Figure 5. Acerataspis? revelata (Brues, 1910), comb. nov. A. Photograph of the holotype obtained from the MCZ; B. Our interpretative drawing of the holotype; C. Photograph of the paratype obtained from the MCZ; D. Our interpretative drawing of the paratype. Thicker lines indicate outlines of body structures, thinner lines show characters inside these outlines, and dotted lines represent uncertain interpretations.	2022-06-07	Spasojevic, Tamara;Broad, Gavin R.;Klopfstein, Seraina		Zenodo	biologists	Spasojevic, Tamara;Broad, Gavin R.;Klopfstein, Seraina			
1838A12068D35A9E864E340DBB5525C4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/693068	https://doi.org/10.3897/fr.25.83034.figure9	Figure 9. Armadilleon morticinus (Brues, 1910) comb. nov. A. Photograph of the holotype obtained from the MCZ; B. Our interpretative drawing of the holotype; C. Photograph of the paratype obtained from the MCZ; D. Our interpretative drawing of the paratype. Thicker black lines indicate outlines of body structures, thinner lines show characters inside these outlines, and dotted lines represent uncertain interpretations. Grey lines and circles show conspicuous sculpture of the cuticle.	Figure 9. Armadilleon morticinus (Brues, 1910) comb. nov. A. Photograph of the holotype obtained from the MCZ; B. Our interpretative drawing of the holotype; C. Photograph of the paratype obtained from the MCZ; D. Our interpretative drawing of the paratype. Thicker black lines indicate outlines of body structures, thinner lines show characters inside these outlines, and dotted lines represent uncertain interpretations. Grey lines and circles show conspicuous sculpture of the cuticle.	2022-06-07	Spasojevic, Tamara;Broad, Gavin R.;Klopfstein, Seraina		Zenodo	biologists	Spasojevic, Tamara;Broad, Gavin R.;Klopfstein, Seraina			
B8CD347FBB7C5F65BF3A26500EFEC4CE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/693069	https://doi.org/10.3897/fr.25.83034.figure10	Figure 10. Armadilleon petrorum (Brues, 1910) comb. nov. A. Photograph of the holotype obtained from the MCZ; B. Our interpretative drawing of the fossil. Thicker black lines indicate outlines of body structures, thinner lines show characters inside these outlines, and dotted lines represent uncertain interpretations. Grey lines and circles show conspicuous sculpture of the cuticle.	Figure 10. Armadilleon petrorum (Brues, 1910) comb. nov. A. Photograph of the holotype obtained from the MCZ; B. Our interpretative drawing of the fossil. Thicker black lines indicate outlines of body structures, thinner lines show characters inside these outlines, and dotted lines represent uncertain interpretations. Grey lines and circles show conspicuous sculpture of the cuticle.	2022-06-07	Spasojevic, Tamara;Broad, Gavin R.;Klopfstein, Seraina		Zenodo	biologists	Spasojevic, Tamara;Broad, Gavin R.;Klopfstein, Seraina			
58A605827BEA505C83B6575DDA58D7AA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/693062	https://doi.org/10.3897/fr.25.83034.figure3	Figure 3. Dimophora? longicornis (Theobald, 1937) comb. nov. A. Photograph obtained from MNHN. F; B. Our interpretative drawing of the fossil. Thicker lines indicate outlines of body structures, thinner lines show characters inside these outlines, and dotted lines represent uncertain interpretations.	Figure 3. Dimophora? longicornis (Theobald, 1937) comb. nov. A. Photograph obtained from MNHN. F; B. Our interpretative drawing of the fossil. Thicker lines indicate outlines of body structures, thinner lines show characters inside these outlines, and dotted lines represent uncertain interpretations.	2022-06-07	Spasojevic, Tamara;Broad, Gavin R.;Klopfstein, Seraina		Zenodo	biologists	Spasojevic, Tamara;Broad, Gavin R.;Klopfstein, Seraina			
D87121D7B502571599840113204AA4F4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/693063	https://doi.org/10.3897/fr.25.83034.figure4	Figure 4. Dimophora? wickhami (Cockerell, 1919) comb. nov. A. Photograph of the counterpart of the holotype obtained from the UCM; B. Photograph of the propodeum from the part of the holotype obtained from the MCZ; C. Our interpretative drawing of the counterpart; D. our interpretative drawing of the propodeum of the part. Thicker lines indicate outlines of body structures, thinner lines show characters inside these outlines, and dotted lines represent uncertain interpretations.	Figure 4. Dimophora? wickhami (Cockerell, 1919) comb. nov. A. Photograph of the counterpart of the holotype obtained from the UCM; B. Photograph of the propodeum from the part of the holotype obtained from the MCZ; C. Our interpretative drawing of the counterpart; D. our interpretative drawing of the propodeum of the part. Thicker lines indicate outlines of body structures, thinner lines show characters inside these outlines, and dotted lines represent uncertain interpretations.	2022-06-07	Spasojevic, Tamara;Broad, Gavin R.;Klopfstein, Seraina		Zenodo	biologists	Spasojevic, Tamara;Broad, Gavin R.;Klopfstein, Seraina			
5A877DF635D25ECC8E3CB5E303CEF8E3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/693061	https://doi.org/10.3897/fr.25.83034.figure2	Figure 2. Hallocinetus? arvernus (Piton, 1940) comb. nov. A. Photograph of the holotype obtained from MNHN. F; B. Our interpretative drawing of the fossil. Thicker lines indicate outlines of body structures, thinner lines show characters inside these outlines, and dotted lines represent uncertain interpretations.	Figure 2. Hallocinetus? arvernus (Piton, 1940) comb. nov. A. Photograph of the holotype obtained from MNHN. F; B. Our interpretative drawing of the fossil. Thicker lines indicate outlines of body structures, thinner lines show characters inside these outlines, and dotted lines represent uncertain interpretations.	2022-06-07	Spasojevic, Tamara;Broad, Gavin R.;Klopfstein, Seraina		Zenodo	biologists	Spasojevic, Tamara;Broad, Gavin R.;Klopfstein, Seraina			
776EDEAC61005B78AC34D5200AB81C2A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/693065	https://doi.org/10.3897/fr.25.83034.figure6	Figure 6. Hypsicera? solidata (Brues, 1910) comb. nov. A. Photograph of the holotype obtained from the MCZ; B. Our interpretative drawing of the fossil. Thicker lines indicate outlines of body structures, thinner lines show characters inside these outlines, and dotted lines represent uncertain interpretations.	Figure 6. Hypsicera? solidata (Brues, 1910) comb. nov. A. Photograph of the holotype obtained from the MCZ; B. Our interpretative drawing of the fossil. Thicker lines indicate outlines of body structures, thinner lines show characters inside these outlines, and dotted lines represent uncertain interpretations.	2022-06-07	Spasojevic, Tamara;Broad, Gavin R.;Klopfstein, Seraina		Zenodo	biologists	Spasojevic, Tamara;Broad, Gavin R.;Klopfstein, Seraina			
EB683F93F675518096CF4159F3E8EFF4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/693070	https://doi.org/10.3897/fr.25.83034.figure11	Figure 11. Lithoserix antiquus (Saussure, 1852) comb. nov. A. Photograph of the holotype obtained from MNHN. F; B. Our interpretative drawing of the fossil. Thicker lines indicate outlines of body structures, thinner lines show characters inside these outlines, dotted lines represent uncertain interpretations and grey surface indicates sculpture of the cuticle. Grey areas show conspicuous sculpture of the cuticle.	Figure 11. Lithoserix antiquus (Saussure, 1852) comb. nov. A. Photograph of the holotype obtained from MNHN. F; B. Our interpretative drawing of the fossil. Thicker lines indicate outlines of body structures, thinner lines show characters inside these outlines, dotted lines represent uncertain interpretations and grey surface indicates sculpture of the cuticle. Grey areas show conspicuous sculpture of the cuticle.	2022-06-07	Spasojevic, Tamara;Broad, Gavin R.;Klopfstein, Seraina		Zenodo	biologists	Spasojevic, Tamara;Broad, Gavin R.;Klopfstein, Seraina			
48E30119F5885B94AA7E0F7D3E4091ED.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/693071	https://doi.org/10.3897/fr.25.83034.figure12	Figure 12. Lithoserix williamsi (Brown, 1986) comb. nov. A. Photograph of the holotype obtained from the UCM; B. Our interpretative drawing of the fossil. Thicker lines indicate outlines of body structures, thinner lines show characters inside these outlines, and dotted lines represent uncertain interpretations.	Figure 12. Lithoserix williamsi (Brown, 1986) comb. nov. A. Photograph of the holotype obtained from the UCM; B. Our interpretative drawing of the fossil. Thicker lines indicate outlines of body structures, thinner lines show characters inside these outlines, and dotted lines represent uncertain interpretations.	2022-06-07	Spasojevic, Tamara;Broad, Gavin R.;Klopfstein, Seraina		Zenodo	biologists	Spasojevic, Tamara;Broad, Gavin R.;Klopfstein, Seraina			
452D2360F5AC5BABB3396A976A657AD5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/693074	https://doi.org/10.3897/fr.25.83034.figure15	Figure 15. Lycorina? indura (Brues, 1910) comb. nov. A. Photograph of the holotype obtained from NMBA; B. Our interpretative drawing of the fossil. Thicker lines indicate outlines of body structures, thinner lines show characters inside these outlines, and dotted lines represent uncertain interpretations.	Figure 15. Lycorina? indura (Brues, 1910) comb. nov. A. Photograph of the holotype obtained from NMBA; B. Our interpretative drawing of the fossil. Thicker lines indicate outlines of body structures, thinner lines show characters inside these outlines, and dotted lines represent uncertain interpretations.	2022-06-07	Spasojevic, Tamara;Broad, Gavin R.;Klopfstein, Seraina		Zenodo	biologists	Spasojevic, Tamara;Broad, Gavin R.;Klopfstein, Seraina			
71AE0079AEB7559BB20E045D84E99AC6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/693075	https://doi.org/10.3897/fr.25.83034.figure16	Figure 16. Monoblastus? senilis (Brues, 1910) comb. nov. A. Photograph of the holotype obtained from the MCZ; B. Our interpretative drawing of the fossil. Thicker lines indicate outlines of body structures, thinner lines show characters inside these outlines, and dotted lines represent uncertain interpretations.	Figure 16. Monoblastus? senilis (Brues, 1910) comb. nov. A. Photograph of the holotype obtained from the MCZ; B. Our interpretative drawing of the fossil. Thicker lines indicate outlines of body structures, thinner lines show characters inside these outlines, and dotted lines represent uncertain interpretations.	2022-06-07	Spasojevic, Tamara;Broad, Gavin R.;Klopfstein, Seraina		Zenodo	biologists	Spasojevic, Tamara;Broad, Gavin R.;Klopfstein, Seraina			
91C3405E095D5F67847614CF164A8EB5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/693066	https://doi.org/10.3897/fr.25.83034.figure7	Figure 7. Orthocentrus defossus (Brues, 1910) A. Photograph of the holotype obtained from the MCZ; B. Our interpretative drawing of the fossil. Thicker lines indicate outlines of body structures, thinner lines show characters inside these outlines, and dotted lines represent uncertain interpretations	Figure 7. Orthocentrus defossus (Brues, 1910) A. Photograph of the holotype obtained from the MCZ; B. Our interpretative drawing of the fossil. Thicker lines indicate outlines of body structures, thinner lines show characters inside these outlines, and dotted lines represent uncertain interpretations	2022-06-07	Spasojevic, Tamara;Broad, Gavin R.;Klopfstein, Seraina		Zenodo	biologists	Spasojevic, Tamara;Broad, Gavin R.;Klopfstein, Seraina			
9BB900BF4F9E52F590BC81EF01D8A6AD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/693067	https://doi.org/10.3897/fr.25.83034.figure8	Figure 8. Orthocentrus? mortuaria (Brues, 1910) comb. nov. A. Photograph of the holotype obtained from the MCZ; B. Our interpretative drawing of the fossil. Thicker lines indicate outlines of body structures, thinner lines show characters inside these outlines, and dotted lines represent uncertain interpretations.	Figure 8. Orthocentrus? mortuaria (Brues, 1910) comb. nov. A. Photograph of the holotype obtained from the MCZ; B. Our interpretative drawing of the fossil. Thicker lines indicate outlines of body structures, thinner lines show characters inside these outlines, and dotted lines represent uncertain interpretations.	2022-06-07	Spasojevic, Tamara;Broad, Gavin R.;Klopfstein, Seraina		Zenodo	biologists	Spasojevic, Tamara;Broad, Gavin R.;Klopfstein, Seraina			
AF90E64A88A4552ABB079F434C6C06A6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/693078	https://doi.org/10.3897/fr.25.83034.figure19	Figure 19. Parapimpla rhenana Theobald, 1937 stat. rev. A. Photograph of the holotype taken at NMBA; B. Our interpretative drawing of the fossil. Thicker lines indicate outlines of body structures, thinner lines show characters inside these outlines, and dotted lines represent uncertain interpretations.	Figure 19. Parapimpla rhenana Theobald, 1937 stat. rev. A. Photograph of the holotype taken at NMBA; B. Our interpretative drawing of the fossil. Thicker lines indicate outlines of body structures, thinner lines show characters inside these outlines, and dotted lines represent uncertain interpretations.	2022-06-07	Spasojevic, Tamara;Broad, Gavin R.;Klopfstein, Seraina		Zenodo	biologists	Spasojevic, Tamara;Broad, Gavin R.;Klopfstein, Seraina			
73457721C4B254DA859BE208EA623014.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/693072	https://doi.org/10.3897/fr.25.83034.figure13	Figure 13. Pimpla? seyrigi (Theobald, 1937), comb. nov. A. Photograph of the part and B. Counterpart of the holotype of taken at the NMBA; C, D. Corresponding interpretative drawings. In the drawings, thicker lines indicate outlines of body structures, thinner lines show characters inside these outlines, and dotted lines represent uncertain interpretations.	Figure 13. Pimpla? seyrigi (Theobald, 1937), comb. nov. A. Photograph of the part and B. Counterpart of the holotype of taken at the NMBA; C, D. Corresponding interpretative drawings. In the drawings, thicker lines indicate outlines of body structures, thinner lines show characters inside these outlines, and dotted lines represent uncertain interpretations.	2022-06-07	Spasojevic, Tamara;Broad, Gavin R.;Klopfstein, Seraina		Zenodo	biologists	Spasojevic, Tamara;Broad, Gavin R.;Klopfstein, Seraina			
652FA2BC4D125A76ABD5AFD89766064F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/693073	https://doi.org/10.3897/fr.25.83034.figure14	Figure 14. Polysphincta? inundata (Brues, 1910) comb. nov. A. Photograph of the holotype obtained from the MCZ; B. Our interpretative drawing of the fossil. Thicker lines indicate outlines of body structures, thinner lines show characters inside these outlines, and dotted lines represent uncertain interpretations.	Figure 14. Polysphincta? inundata (Brues, 1910) comb. nov. A. Photograph of the holotype obtained from the MCZ; B. Our interpretative drawing of the fossil. Thicker lines indicate outlines of body structures, thinner lines show characters inside these outlines, and dotted lines represent uncertain interpretations.	2022-06-07	Spasojevic, Tamara;Broad, Gavin R.;Klopfstein, Seraina		Zenodo	biologists	Spasojevic, Tamara;Broad, Gavin R.;Klopfstein, Seraina			
F4178AA8E0C55507B0DF7D82EAB899CB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/693077	https://doi.org/10.3897/fr.25.83034.figure18	Figure 18. Xorides sejugatus (Brues, 1910) comb. nov. A. Photograph of the holotype obtained from the MCZ; B. Our interpretative drawing of the fossil (below). Thicker lines indicate outlines of body structures, thinner lines show characters inside these outlines, and dotted lines represent uncertain interpretations.	Figure 18. Xorides sejugatus (Brues, 1910) comb. nov. A. Photograph of the holotype obtained from the MCZ; B. Our interpretative drawing of the fossil (below). Thicker lines indicate outlines of body structures, thinner lines show characters inside these outlines, and dotted lines represent uncertain interpretations.	2022-06-07	Spasojevic, Tamara;Broad, Gavin R.;Klopfstein, Seraina		Zenodo	biologists	Spasojevic, Tamara;Broad, Gavin R.;Klopfstein, Seraina			
54ACF8C1C3AA594BB8D6528113AC92FC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/693076	https://doi.org/10.3897/fr.25.83034.figure17	Figure 17. Zagryphus tilloyi (Theobald, 1937) comb. nov. A. Photograph of the holotype obtained from MNHN. F; B. Our interpretative drawing of the fossil. Thicker lines indicate outlines of body structures, thinner lines show characters inside these outlines, and dotted lines represent uncertain interpretations.	Figure 17. Zagryphus tilloyi (Theobald, 1937) comb. nov. A. Photograph of the holotype obtained from MNHN. F; B. Our interpretative drawing of the fossil. Thicker lines indicate outlines of body structures, thinner lines show characters inside these outlines, and dotted lines represent uncertain interpretations.	2022-06-07	Spasojevic, Tamara;Broad, Gavin R.;Klopfstein, Seraina		Zenodo	biologists	Spasojevic, Tamara;Broad, Gavin R.;Klopfstein, Seraina			
