taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
7A7E97354D3EFFAFFCA1537E5EE3E400.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/4551856/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4551856	Fig. 5. Classification tree from the CART analysis built on 60 individuals representing the four clades within the E. fornicatus complex. Relevant characters for the node splits are shown.Classification rates are expressed as the number of correct classifications divided by the number of observations (individual beetles) in the node for the individuals used to train the CART model.	Fig. 5. Classification tree from the CART analysis built on 60 individuals representing the four clades within the E. fornicatus complex. Relevant characters for the node splits are shown.Classification rates are expressed as the number of correct classifications divided by the number of observations (individual beetles) in the node for the individuals used to train the CART model.	2018-11-28	Gomez, Demian F.;Skelton, James;Steininger, M. Sedonia;Stouthamer, Richard;Rugman-Jones, Paul;Sittichaya, Wisut;Rabaglia, Robert J.;Hulcr, Jiri		Zenodo	biologists	Gomez, Demian F.;Skelton, James;Steininger, M. Sedonia;Stouthamer, Richard;Rugman-Jones, Paul;Sittichaya, Wisut;Rabaglia, Robert J.;Hulcr, Jiri			
