identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
7F73F82BFFA9FF95FF58C16B785943C6.text	7F73F82BFFA9FF95FF58C16B785943C6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Ammosphex Wilcke 1942	<div><p>Subgenus Ammosphex Wilcke, 1942</p><p>Psammochares (Psammochares) gibbus- group Haupt, 1927: 154, 162, 200.</p><p>Ammosphex Wilcke, 1942: 25 (type species Pompilus unguicularis Thomson, 1870 (= Pompilus anceps Wesmael, 1851), by original designation); Wilcke 1943: 12, 47.</p><p>Ammosphex (as subgenus of Arachnospila Kincaid, 1900): Wolf 1972: 109, Ƥ 3; Tobias 1978: 127, Ƥ 3; Day 1979: 11; Wahis 1986: 19; Lelej et al. 1994: 142, Ƥ 3; Lelej 1995: 238, 243, 3; 2000: 623; 2005: 127, Ƥ 3; Kurzenko et al. 1995: 301, 3; Shimizu 1996: 510; v.d. Smissen 1996: 73; Loktionov 2011: 83; Wahis 2011.</p><p>Ammosphex (as subgenus of Pompilus Fabricius, 1798): Evans 1951: 227, 3 Ƥ; Wolf 1966: 42, 44, 3 Ƥ; Krombein 1979: 1563.</p><p>Anopompilinus Dreisbach, 1949: 7, 10, 11 (type species Anopompilinus michiganensis Dreisbach, 1949, by monotypy). Junior subjective synonym of Ammosphex Wilcke, 1942 according to Evans 1951: 227.</p><p>Aridopompilus Wolf, 1965a: 101 (as subgenus of Pompilus Fabricius, 1798) (type species Pompilus ausus Tournier, 1890, by original designation); Wolf 1966: 42, 43, Ƥ 3 (as subgenus of Pompilus Fabricius, 1798). Junior subjective synonym of Ammosphex Wilcke, 1942 according to Wahis 1986: 19.</p><p>Boreopompilus Wolf, 1965a: 101 (as subgenus of Pompilus Fabricius, 1798) (type species Pompilus trivialis trivialis Dahlbom, 1843, by original designation); Wolf 1966: 43, 44, Ƥ 3 (as subgenus of Pompilus Fabricius, 1798); 1972: 98, 110, Ƥ 3 (as subgenus of Arachnospila Kincaid, 1900). Junior subjective synonym of Ammosphex Wilcke, 1942 according to Day 1979: 11.</p><p>Holarctopompilus Wolf, 1965a: 101 (type species Psammochares gibbomimus Haupt, 1929, by original designation); Wolf 1966: 42, 44, Ƥ 3 (as subgenus of Pompilus Fabricius, 1798); 1972: 98, 112, Ƥ 3 (as subgenus of Arachnospila Kincaid, 1900). Junior subjective synonym of Ammosphex Wilcke, 1942 according to Evans in Krombein 1979: 1563.</p><p>Saxatilipompilus Wolf, 1965a: 101 (type species Pompilus opinatus Tournier, 1890, by original designation); Wolf 1966: 42, 43, Ƥ 3 (as subgenus of Pompilus Fabricius, 1798); 1972: 103, 112, Ƥ 3 (as subgenus of Arachnospila Kincaid, 1900). Junior subjective synonym of Ammosphex Wilcke, 1942 according to Wahis 1986: 19.</p><p>Subgeneric characters (from: Evans 1951, with modification). Small wasps, 3.5 to 12 mm in length. Color black, some species with basal abdominal segments rufous. Body with variable amount of erect setae, but seldom as many as in the subgenus Arachnospila Kincaid, 1900; front and propodeum at most moderately setose. Mandibles bidentate in male, tridentate in female. Antennal segment 3 [flagellomere 1] of male over twice as long as thick, and as long as segment 4 [flagellomere 2]. Posterior margin of pronotum distinctly angulate. Postnotum [metapostnotum] of moderate length, at least half length of metanotum. Front tarsus of female with comb of short to fairly long spines, basitarsus always with three comb-spines [seldom with four comb-spines]. Last tarsomere of front tarsus of male strongly asymmetrical, with lobe on inner margin that reaches its widest at about middle of tarsomere, outer claw of this tarsomere bifid, the inner claw bifid with inner ray short and rounded. Pulvillar comb fairly well developed, of about 12 setulae for female, about 8 for male. Fore wing with basal [M] vein arising at or slightly before transverse median [cu-a] vein. Stigma very short; marginal [radial] cell short, not more than 2.5 × as long as high, at least 1.3 × its own length from the tip of the wing. Second and third submarginal [radio-medial] cells rather small, rarely wider than high, often higher than wide, much narrowed above [Figs 95–125]. Subgenital plate of male variously modified, never with large lateral expansions at the base or with palpus-like processes [Figs 1–37]. Genitalia [Figs 38–56] with double basal hooklets: parameres [gonostyli] long and more or less setose; digiti [volsella] of rather uniform pattern throughout group, expanded and curved apically, disc usually with area of feeble longitudinal striolations toward apex. Parapenials rather short, always shorter than aedoeagus; aedoeagus [penial valves] bearing somewhere along its margins number of small, pigmented, tooth-like projections, clearly visible under high magnification.</p><p>Biology. Members of this subgenus occur in a variety of habitats from open steppe areas to any type of forest, where they may be found close to the ground in sunny spots. A few data are known about the habitats of species from the Russian Far East and East Siberia. Usually Arachnospila (Ammosphex) kuwayamai (Ishikawa) and other species of the A. (A.) abnormis- group inhabit sandy shores of rivers and lakes.</p><p>The prey consists of spiders Lycosidae, Clubionidae, Gnaphosidae, Pisauridae, Salticidae, Thomisidae, Segestriidae (Evans 1951, Krombein 1979, WiŠniowski 2009).</p><p>Distribution. Holarctic Region; represented in Europe by 18 species, in Russia by 25 species, of which 19 species inhabit the Russian Far East and East Siberia and are included in this paper. Eleven species of this subgenus occur in North America (Krombein 1979).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7F73F82BFFA9FF95FF58C16B785943C6	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Loktionov, Valery M.;Lelej, Arkady S.	Loktionov, Valery M., Lelej, Arkady S. (2011): Review of the subgenus Ammosphex Wilcke, 1942 of the genus Arachnospila Kincaid, 1900 (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) of the Russian Far East and East Siberia. Zootaxa 3137: 1-30, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.202611
7F73F82BFFAAFF92FF58C16D78514165.text	7F73F82BFFAAFF92FF58C16D78514165.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Arachnospila (Ammosphex) abnormis (Dahlbom 1842) Dahlbom 1842	<div><p>Arachnospila (Ammosphex) abnormis (Dahlbom, 1842)</p><p>(Figs 3, 4, 38, 57, 77, 95)</p><p>Pompilus abnormis Dahlbom, 1842: 10, 3 (lectotype, 3 "UPPBO, ö. Dalarne. 2.9.[18]40" [Sweden], designated by v.d. Smissen 1996: 88 [Universitetets Zoologiska Institution, Lund, Sweden]).</p><p>Pompilus (Boreopompilus) abnormis: Wolf 1966: 43, 51, 54, 92, Ƥ 3.</p><p>Arachnospila (Boreopompilus) abnormis: Wolf 1972: 96, 98, 112, Ƥ 3.</p><p>Arachnospila (Ammosphex) abnormis: Tobias 1978: 128, 130, Ƥ 3; Wahis 1986: 19; Lelej 1995: 243, 3; 2005: 127, Ƥ 3; v.d. Smissen 1996: 86, 87, Ƥ 3; Loktionov 2011: 83; Wahis 2011.</p><p>Arachnospila abnormis: Zonstein 2002: 137 .</p><p>Diagnosis of male. The male of this species is easily distinguished from other males of Arachnospila (Ammosphex) abnormis -species group (hypopygium ventro-preapically with tuft of long erect setae medially) by having one row of bristles (not setae) on the hypopygium baso-laterally (Figs 3, 4 vs. 1, 2, 5–12). Genitalia as in Fig. 38.</p><p>Diagnosis of female. The female of this species is very similar to that of Arachnospila (Ammosphex) kuwayamai (Ishikawa, 1966) by having apical spine of first protarsomere more than 0.5 of protarsomere 2 in length, by shiny frons, by ratio of first flagellomere length to its width 3.2–3.9, by protarsomere 1 with three spines, but clearly differs by having curved 2rs-m vein of fore wing (Fig. 95 vs. 106). Clypeus as in Fig. 57. Metapostnotum as in Fig. 77.</p><p>Material examined. RUSSIA. Primorskiy Terr.: 1 3, Khasan, 13.VII.1992; 2 3, "Kedrovaya Pad" Reserve, 5.VI.1997; 1 3, Vladivostok, 3.VI.1978; 1 3, Anisimovka, 21.VI.1975; 1 3, Lazovsky Reserve, 20–21.VII.2006; 1 3, Milogradovo, 14.VI.1986; 1 3, Margaritovka, 14.VI.1986; 1 3, Uglekamensk, 2.VI.1994; 3 Ƥ 12 3, Brovnichi, 18.VII.1984, 5.VI.1994; 1 3, Novitzkoe, 18.VIII.1985; 1 3, Suvorovka, 13.VI.1993; 1 Ƥ 5 3, Ussuriiskiy Reserve, 30.VIII.1982, 9.VIII.1986, 2.VI.1989; 6 3, Barabash-Levada, 29.VI.1978, 3, 4.VI.1980, 23.VI.1999; 2 3, Novoselische, 5.VI.1977; 2 3, Yakovlevka, 25.VII.1986; 1 3, Shumnyi, 28.VI.1989; 1 3, Tekhmenevo, 4.VIII.1986; 1 3, 70 km SE Chuguevka, 13.VII.2010. Khabarovsk Terr.: 1 3, 15 km SW Elabuga, 4.VIII.1975; 3 3, Savinskoe, 8.VIII.1991. Amurskaya Prov.: 1 3, Shimanovsk, 1–3.VII.1958; 1 Ƥ 1 3, Natal'ino, 11, 12.VII.1975. Sakhalin: 4 Ƥ 1 3, Pomr Bay, 13.VIII.2003. Kamchatka: 1 Ƥ 1 3, 10 km S Kozyrevsk, 23.VII.1985; 2 Ƥ 1 3, Esso, 20.VII.2005; 1 Ƥ 1 3, 20 km E Esso, 21.VII.2005. Chukotka: 1 Ƥ 1 3, Omolon River, 180 km N Omolon, 24.VII, 16.VIII.1976. Magadan Prov.: 1 3, 50 km N Magadan, 2.VII.1975; 2 3, Seimchan, 24.VII, 4.VIII.1975. Buryatia: 2 3, Ust-Kiran, Chikoy River, 27.V.2008. Irkutsk Prov.: 1 3, Baikalsk, 30.VI.1983. BELARUS. 1 3, Pinsk, 15.VII.1987 [IBSS].</p><p>Distribution. Russia (Primorskiy Terr., Khabarovsk Terr., Amurskaya Prov., North Sakhalin, Kamchatka, Magadan Prov., Chukotka; north-east, center and south of European part) (Tobias 1978; Lelej 2005), Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, Norway, Poland, Sweden, Switzerland, the Netherlands (Wahis 2011), Ukraine, Belarus (Shlyachtenok 1996), Kazakhstan, North-East China, Kyrgyzstan (Zonstein 2002).</p><p>Biology. Nests in natural cavities in the ground, sometimes females excavate short tunnels ending in a single cell (WiŠniowski 2009).</p><p>The cleptoparasites of Arachnospila (Ammosphex) abnormis are pompilids: Evagetes sahlbergi (Dahlbom) and E. siculus (Lepeletier) (v.d. Smissen 2003).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7F73F82BFFAAFF92FF58C16D78514165	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Loktionov, Valery M.;Lelej, Arkady S.	Loktionov, Valery M., Lelej, Arkady S. (2011): Review of the subgenus Ammosphex Wilcke, 1942 of the genus Arachnospila Kincaid, 1900 (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) of the Russian Far East and East Siberia. Zootaxa 3137: 1-30, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.202611
7F73F82BFFAEFF90FF58C25A787D4631.text	7F73F82BFFAEFF90FF58C25A787D4631.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Arachnospila (Ammosphex) anceps (Wesmael 1851) Wesmael 1851	<div><p>Arachnospila (Ammosphex) anceps (Wesmael, 1851)</p><p>(Figs 15, 16, 48, 58, 78, 96, 97)</p><p>Sphex vagus Harris, 1779: 95 (type locality: Great Britain), nom praeocc., non Sphex vaga Linnaeus, 1758 . Pompilus anceps Wesmael, 1851: 463, Ƥ (lectotype, Ƥ, " Belgium ", designated by Wahis 1957: 5 [Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Brussels]).</p><p>Pompilus (Ammosphex) anceps: Wolf 1966: 42, 49, 66, 74, Ƥ 3.</p><p>Arachnospila (Ammosphex) anceps anceps: Móczár 1968: 430, Ƥ.</p><p>Arachnospila (Ammosphex) anceps: Wolf 1972: 96, 102, 109, Ƥ 3; Tobias 1978: 128, 132, Ƥ 3; Day 1979: 12; Wahis 1986: 19; Lelej 1995: 246, 3; v.d. Smissen 1996: 86, 90, Ƥ 3; Loktionov 2011: 83; Wahis 2011.</p><p>Arachnospila anceps: Zonstein 2002: 137, Ƥ 3.</p><p>Pompilus unguicularis Thomson, 1870: 221, Ƥ 3 (lectotype, Ƥ, Sweden, designated by Day 1979: 12 [Universitetets Zoologiska Institution, Lund, Sweden]). Junior subjective synonym of Pompilus anceps Wesmael, 1851 according to Wahis 1957: 5.</p><p>Psammochares (Psammochares) unguicularis: Haupt 1927: 155, 201, Ƥ.</p><p>Psammochares (Psammochares) gibbus: Haupt 1927: 164, 204, 3, misidentification.</p><p>Pompilus (Ammosphex) anceps cyrnus Wolf, 1965a: 89, Ƥ (holotype, Ƥ "Lac de Nino, 1600 m, Corse, 15.VIII.1950 " [France]); Wolf 1966: 48, 78, Ƥ. Junior subjective synonym of Pompilus anceps Wesmael, 1851 according to Wahis 1986: 19.</p><p>Pompilus (Ammosphex) anceps peninsulanus Wolf, 1966: 49, 66, 78, Ƥ 3 (holotype, Ƥ " Italien, Cattolica, 10.VII.1960 (W. Gruenwaldt)" [Italy]). Junior subjective synonym of Pompilus anceps Wesmael, 1851 according to Wahis 1986: 19.</p><p>Arachnospila (Ammosphex) anceps serica Wolf and Móczár, 1972: 245, 246, Ƥ 3 (holotype, Ƥ "Chövsgöl aimak, 3 km SW von Somon Burenchaan, 1650 m, Exp. Dr. Z. Kaszab, 1968, 21.VI.1968 " [Mongolia], [Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest], examined). Junior subjective synonym of Pompilus anceps Wesmael, 1851 according to Wahis 1986: 19.</p><p>Diagnosis of male. The male of this species is easily distinguished from other males of the subgenus Ammosphex by having hypopygium not narrowed subbasally, gradually convergent to the apex, without any median carinae, and with one tuft of setae (not bristles) baso-laterally (Figs 15, 16 vs. 1–14, 17–37). Genitalia as in Fig. 48.</p><p>Diagnosis of female. The female of this species is similar to female of Arachnospila (Ammosphex) wolfi Lelej, 1995 by having ratio of eye width to half frontal width 0.9 and more, but clearly differs by having shiny frons (matt in A. (A.) wolfi) and propodeum laterally with long erect sparse setae (without long erect setae, at most with a few short setae in A. (A.) wolfi). Clypeus as in Fig. 58. Metapostnotum as in Fig. 78. Venation of fore wing as in Figs 96, 97.</p><p>Material examined. RUSSIA. Amurskaya Prov.: 4 Ƥ 5 3, Khinganskiy Reserve, 12.VI.1987, 18– 28.VII.1988. Kamchatka: 1 3, Esso, 25.VII.2005. Magadan Prov.: 2 3, 150 km W Magadan, 7.VII.1975. Chukotka: 1 Ƥ, Omolon River, 180 km N Omolon, 8.VIII.1976. Transbaikalskiy Terr.: 1 Ƥ, Chita, Peschanka, 28.VII.1984 [IBSS].</p><p>Distribution. Russia (Amurskaya prov., Kamchatka, Magadan Prov., *Chukotka; Transbaikalskiy Terr., northwest, east and centre of European part) (Tobias 1978; Lelej 1995), Albania, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Germany, Great Britain, Greece, Italy, Luxembourg, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, Switzerland, the Netherlands (Wahis 2011), Belarus (Shlyachtenok 1996), Turkey, Syria, Iran, Mongolia (Móczár 1968), Kyrgyzstan (Zonstein 2002).</p><p>Biology. The cleptoparasites of Arachnospila (Ammosphex) anceps are pompilids: Ceropales maculata (Fabricius) (Lelej 1995) and Evagetes crassicornis (Shuckard) (v.d. Smissen 2003).</p><p>The prey consists of spiders Clubiona Latreille (Clubionidae), Drassodes Westring (Gnaphosidae), Alopecosa Simon, Pardosa C.L. Koch, Trochosa C.L. Koch (Lycosidae), Pisaura Simon (Pisauridae), Evarcha Simon (Salticidae), Xysticus C.L. Koch (Thomisidae) (WiŠniowski 2009).</p><p>Female excavates a short burrow in the ground ending in a single cell. During excavation the paralyzed spider is hidden on a plant (WiŠniowski 2009).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7F73F82BFFAEFF90FF58C25A787D4631	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Loktionov, Valery M.;Lelej, Arkady S.	Loktionov, Valery M., Lelej, Arkady S. (2011): Review of the subgenus Ammosphex Wilcke, 1942 of the genus Arachnospila Kincaid, 1900 (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) of the Russian Far East and East Siberia. Zootaxa 3137: 1-30, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.202611
7F73F82BFFAFFF9FFF58C30878F343E5.text	7F73F82BFFAFFF9FFF58C30878F343E5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Arachnospila (Ammosphex) belokobylskii Loktionov and Lelej	<div><p>Arachnospila (Ammosphex) belokobylskii Loktionov and Lelej, sp. nov.</p><p>(Figs 32, 33, 53, 98)</p><p>Diagnosis of male. The male of this species is very similar to that of Arachnospila (Ammosphex) dschingis Wolf and Móczár, 1972, but is easily distinguished by having the gonostyli approximately equal to the parapenial lobe in length (longer than the parapenial lobe in A. (A.) dschingis), by the gonostyli with short erect scattered setae apically (with long erect dense setae in A. (A.) dschingis), by the volsella rounded apically (acuminate in A. (A.) dschingis) (Fig. 53 vs. 54). The differences from other males of the subgenus Ammosphex, which are distributed in the Russian Far East and East Siberia, are given in the key below.</p><p>Description. MALE. Body length 5.4–6.0 mm (holotype 6.0 mm). Fore wing length 4.1–4.8 mm (holotype 4.2 mm). Head width 1.2–1.3 × its height. Ocelli small, POD/OOD 0.70–0.86. Ratio of genal median width to eye median width (lateral view) 0.45–0.57. Clypeus weakly convex, anterior border weakly and arcuately emarginate. Labrum flat, anterior border weakly emarginate medially. Flagellomere 1 length 1.22–1.38 × its width. Relation of scape, pedicel and two first flagellomeres 25–30: 10–11: 17–19: 19–22. Mesosoma length dorsally 1.37–1.60 × its maximum width. Pronotum median length 0.35–0.47 × its median width, posterior pronotal border indistinctly angulate. Metanotum median length 2.20–2.75 × metapostnotum median length. Metapostnotum shiny with transverse striae, its posterior border with smooth shiny triangle medially. Propodeum with median longitudinal furrow dorsally; its median length 0.7 × its maximum width (dorsal view). Fore wing slightly infuscated with darker apical part, venation as in Fig. 98, 3r-m cell usually nearly trapeziform, sometimes triangular. Hypopygium gradually narrowed to the apex, with high longitudinal median carina and short dense setae ventro-laterally (Figs 32, 33). Genitalia as in Fig. 53.</p><p>Propleura, genae, and labrum latero-apically with long erect setae. Mandible with 2–3 long strong and a few short soft erect setae. Inner eye orbit with long erect sparse setae. Other body parts without setae. Lateral side of mesosoma and propodeum, and hind side of mid and hind coxae with dense silver to gray pubescence. Head, pronotum, mesoscutum, scutellum, metanotum, fore coxae, and mid and hind coxae anteriorly with brownish pubescence. Metasoma with regular sparse gray pubescence. Body regularly micropunctate. Body and legs black. Mandible brownish apically, T1 and S1 (except basal portion), T2 and S2 (except apical portion), and sometimes T3 basally ferruginous-red.</p><p>FEMALE. Unknown.</p><p>Type material. Holotype, 3, RUSSIA: Primorskiy Terr., Spassk, 3–6.VII.1993 (S. Belokobylskij) [ZIN]. Paratypes, 2 3, RUSSIA: Primorskiy Terr., Lazovsky Reserve, Korpad, 17.VII.2008 (V. Loktionov) [IBSS].</p><p>Distribution. Russia (Primorskiy Terr.).</p><p>Etymology. Named after Sergey A. Belokobylskij (Zoological Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia), a specialist in Braconidae, excellent collector of Hymenoptera, for his contributions to the taxonomy of Pompilidae .</p><p>Biology. Inhabits glades in broad-leaved forest.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7F73F82BFFAFFF9FFF58C30878F343E5	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Loktionov, Valery M.;Lelej, Arkady S.	Loktionov, Valery M., Lelej, Arkady S. (2011): Review of the subgenus Ammosphex Wilcke, 1942 of the genus Arachnospila Kincaid, 1900 (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) of the Russian Far East and East Siberia. Zootaxa 3137: 1-30, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.202611
7F73F82BFFA0FF9FFF58C15C78364705.text	7F73F82BFFA0FF9FFF58C15C78364705.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Arachnospila (Ammosphex) dschingis Wolf and Moczar 1972	<div><p>Arachnospila (Ammosphex) dschingis Wolf and Móczár, 1972</p><p>(Figs 30, 31, 54, 59, 79, 99)</p><p>Arachnospila (Ammosphex) dschingis Wolf and Móczár, 1972: 245 (Ƥ), 246 (3), 250 (holotype, Ƥ, Mongolia, Chovd aimak, Mongol Altaj Gebirge, cca 16 km S den Somon Manchan, 1700 m, 9.VII.1966 (Z. Kaszab) [Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest], examined).</p><p>Diagnosis of male. The male of this species resembles that of Arachnospila (Ammosphex) belokobylskii sp. nov. by having hypopygium with well developed longitudinal median carina and short erect setae (Figs 30, 31, lateral view), but clearly differs by having gonostyli (ventral view) broadened preapically and volsella acuminate apically (gonostyli not broadened preapically and volsella not acuminate apically in A. (A.) belokobylskii) (Fig. 54 vs. 53).</p><p>Diagnosis of female. The female of this species is similar to females of other species which have ratio of eye width to half frontal width 0.8 and less, but differs by having apical flagellomere length almost 3 × its width (2 × in Arachnospila (Ammosphex) orientausa sp. nov.), by propodeum with ~20 long erect setae (~50 long erect setae in A. (A.) rasnitsyni sp.nov.), by shiny anterior rim of clypeus, which is distinctly set off from other part of clypeus (Fig. 59 vs. 62), and by first flagellomere length 4.4–4.7 × its width (3.4–4.3 × in other females). Metapostnotum as in Fig. 79. Venation of fore wing as in Fig. 99.</p><p>Material examined. RUSSIA. Buryatia: 2 3, Bilutai, 23.V.2008; 4 Ƥ, Gusinoe Lake, Baraty, 6, 7.VIII.1984; 1 3, Naushki, 2.VIII.1984. Irkutsk Prov.: 1 Ƥ 2 3, 15 km E Ust-Orda, Ordinsk, 1, 2.VIII.1994 [IBSS].</p><p>Distribution. * Russia (Buryatia, Irkutsk Prov.), Mongolia (Wolf &amp; Móczár 1972).</p><p>Biology. Inhabits steppe areas.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7F73F82BFFA0FF9FFF58C15C78364705	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Loktionov, Valery M.;Lelej, Arkady S.	Loktionov, Valery M., Lelej, Arkady S. (2011): Review of the subgenus Ammosphex Wilcke, 1942 of the genus Arachnospila Kincaid, 1900 (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) of the Russian Far East and East Siberia. Zootaxa 3137: 1-30, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.202611
7F73F82BFFA0FF9EFF58C23C79B444E6.text	7F73F82BFFA0FF9EFF58C23C79B444E6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Arachnospila (Ammosphex) eoabnormis Lelej 1995	<div><p>Arachnospila (Ammosphex) eoabnormis Lelej, 1995</p><p>(Figs 5, 6, 39, 60, 80, 100, 101)</p><p>Arachnospila (Ammosphex) eoabnormis Lelej, 1995: 243, 3 (holotype, 3, Primorskiy Terr., Khasan, 21.VIII.1977 (Lelej) [IBSS], examined); Kurzenko et al. 1995: 301; Loktionov 2011: 83.</p><p>Diagnosis of male. The male of this species is easily distinguished from other males of the Arachnospila (Ammosphex) abnormis -species group (hypopygium ventro-preapically with tuft of long erect setae medially) by concave or flat hypopygium without any row of setae or bristles baso-laterally and without median carina (Figs 5, 6 vs. 1–4, 7–12). Genitalia as in Fig. 39.</p><p>Diagnosis of female. The female of this species is very similar to that of Arachnospila (Ammosphex) subvittata (F. Morawitz, 1889), but differs by having 2r-m cell of fore wing equal to 3r-m cell (2r-m cell wider than 3r-m cell in A. (A.) subvittata) (Figs 100, 101 vs. 115, 116). Clypeus as in Fig. 60. Metapostnotum as in Fig. 80.</p><p>Description. FEMALE (hitherto unknown). Body length 9.0– 9.5 mm. Fore wing length 7.0– 7.3 mm. Head width 1.1–1.2 × its height. Ocelli small, POD/OOD 0.9–1.0. Ratio of genal median width to eye median width (lateral view) 0.6–0.7. Ratio of eye median width to half width of frons (frontal view) 0.6–0.7. Clypeus weakly longitudinally convex, with straight anterior border and broad smooth rim, which is not narrowed medially (Fig. 60). Flagellomere 1 length 3.9–4.0 × its width. Relation of scape, pedicel and first two flagellomeres 42–45: 15: 54–55: 48–50. Apical flagellomere acuminate. Mesosoma length dorsally 1.4–1.5 × its width. Pronotum median length 0.3–0.4 × its median width, posterior pronotal border weakly angulate. Metanotum median length 1.7 × metapostnotum median length. Metapostnotum as in Fig. 80. Spines of tarsal comb short, protarsomere 1 with three spines of tarsal comb, tarsomeres 2 and 3 with two spines, tarsomere 4 with one spine, and tarsomere 5 without spine; apical spine of protarsomere 1 0.5–0.6 length of protarsomere 2; apical spine of tarsomere 2 0.6–0.8 × length of tarsomere 3. Wings infuscated with darker apical portion, venation of fore wing as in Figs 100, 101.</p><p>Frons with 5–7 long dark brown erect setae. Fore coxa anteriorly, T6, S2–S6 apically with long erect dark brown scattered setae. Gena and propleura with denser long erect pale brown soft setae. Clypeus with three long erect dark brown setae. Pronotum with short erect rare setae. Side of propodeum with a few short erect setae. Head, mesosoma, propodeum, legs (except coxa posteriorly) with iridescent mainly brownish micropubescence. Coxae posteriorly with silver pubescence. Metasoma with gray micropubescence. Body regularly micropunctate; frons matt puncticulate. Body and legs black. Mandible pale brown apically and dark brown basally; T1 (except basal portion) and T2 basally ferruginous-red.</p><p>Type material. Paratypes. RUSSIA: Primorskiy Terr., 1 3, Khasan, 21.VIII.1977. Amurskaya Prov.: 3 3, Khinganskiy Reserve, Kundur, 20, 24.VII.1988. Additional material. RUSSIA. Primorskiy Terr.: 1 3, Telyakovskogo Bay, 11.VI.2003; 1 3, Anisimovka, 7.VI.1993; 1 3, 20 km SW Krounovka, 3.VIII.1993; 1 Ƥ 1 3, Lazovsky Reserve, 13.VII.2008; 1 Ƥ 8 3, Dvoryanka, 3, 4.VII.2009; 1 3, Spassk, 4.VIII.1994 [IBSS].</p><p>Distribution. Russia (Primorskiy Terr., Amurskaya Prov.) (Lelej 1995).</p><p>Biology. Inhabits sandy shores along rivers, lakes and by the sea.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7F73F82BFFA0FF9EFF58C23C79B444E6	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Loktionov, Valery M.;Lelej, Arkady S.	Loktionov, Valery M., Lelej, Arkady S. (2011): Review of the subgenus Ammosphex Wilcke, 1942 of the genus Arachnospila Kincaid, 1900 (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) of the Russian Far East and East Siberia. Zootaxa 3137: 1-30, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.202611
7F73F82BFFA1FF9EFF58C040783647F2.text	7F73F82BFFA1FF9EFF58C040783647F2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Arachnospila (Ammosphex) kaszabi Wolf and Moczar 1972	<div><p>Arachnospila (Ammosphex) kaszabi Wolf and Móczár, 1972</p><p>(Figs 20, 21, 46, 61, 81, 102, 103)</p><p>Arachnospila (Alpinopompilus) kaszabi Wolf and Móczár, 1972: 244 (Ƥ), 245 (3), 246 (holotype, Ƥ, Mongolia, Bajanchongor aimak, Changaj Gebirge, 120 km W von Somon Zag, 2280 m, 22.VI.1966 (Kaszab) [Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest], examined).</p><p>Diagnosis of male. The male of this species is similar to males of Arachnospila (Ammosphex) anceps (Wesmael, 1851) and A. (A.) rasnitsyni sp. nov. by having similar shape of hypopygium, but differs from the former by having hypopygium with parallel sides basally and row of setae baso-laterally (gradually convergent to the apex and with tuft of setae in A. (A.) anceps) (Figs 20, 21 vs. 15, 16), and differs from the latter by having clypeus and frons with short erect setae or lacking setae (with scattered long erect setae in A. (A.) rasnitsyni), and by volsella with rare setae ventrally (with dense setae in A. (A.) rasnitsyni) (Fig. 46 vs. 55).</p><p>Diagnosis of female. The female of this species clearly differs from other females by having protarsomere 1 with four long spines (with three short spines in other females). Clypeus as in Fig. 61. Metapostnotum as in Fig. 81. Venation of fore wing as in Figs 102, 103.</p><p>Material examined. RUSSIA. Buryatia: 14 Ƥ 21 3, Naushki, 2–5.VIII.1984, 30.VII.2007, 1.VI.2008; 1 Ƥ 4 3, Kyakhta, 28.VIII.1977, 30.V.2008; 2 Ƥ 2 3, Selenduma, 20, 24.V.2008; 37 Ƥ 8 3, 5 km N Naushki, Khoronkhoi, 28–31.VII, 1, 2.VIII.1977, 21–24.IX.1980 [IBSS].</p><p>Distribution. * Russia (Buryatia), Mongolia (Wolf &amp; Móczár 1972).</p><p>Biology. Inhabits steppe areas.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7F73F82BFFA1FF9EFF58C040783647F2	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Loktionov, Valery M.;Lelej, Arkady S.	Loktionov, Valery M., Lelej, Arkady S. (2011): Review of the subgenus Ammosphex Wilcke, 1942 of the genus Arachnospila Kincaid, 1900 (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) of the Russian Far East and East Siberia. Zootaxa 3137: 1-30, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.202611
7F73F82BFFA2FF9DFF58C5E67AF44786.text	7F73F82BFFA2FF9DFF58C5E67AF44786.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Arachnospila (Ammosphex) kurentzovi Lelej 1995	<div><p>Arachnospila (Ammosphex) kurentzovi Lelej, 1995</p><p>(Figs 7, 8, 42, 62, 82, 104)</p><p>Arachnospila (Ammosphex) kurentzovi Lelej, 1995: 245, 3 (holotype, 3, Primorskiy Terr., Zanadvorovka, 23.VI.1987 (Lelej) [IBSS], examined); Loktionov 2011: 83.</p><p>Diagnosis of male. The male of this species is easily distinguished from other males of Arachnospila (Ammosphex) abnormis -species group (hypopygium ventro-preapically with tuft of long erect setae medially) by roof-like hypopygium without any row of setae or bristles baso-laterally (Figs 7, 8 vs. 1–6, 9–12). The male of this species differs from very similar A. (A.) kuwayamai (Ishikawa, 1966) by having hypopygium acuminate apically (rounded apically in A. (A.) kuwayamai) (Figs 7, 8 vs. 9, 10). Genitalia as in Fig. 42.</p><p>Diagnosis of female. The female of this species is similar to other females which have narrow eye and wide frons, but differs by having apical flagellomere length almost 3 × its width (2 × in Arachnospila (Ammosphex) orientausa sp. nov.), by less hirsute propodeum, which has ~20 long erect setae (~50 long erect setae in A. (A.) rasnitsyni sp.nov.), and by shiny anterior rim of clypeus, which is indistinctly set off from other part of clypeus (distinctly set off in other females) (Fig. 62 vs. 57, 59, 60, 63–66, 69–75). Metapostnotum as in Fig. 82. Venation of fore wing as in Fig. 104.</p><p>Description. FEMALE (hitherto unknown). Body length 7.9–9.7 mm. Fore wing length 6.0–7.0 mm. Head width 1.1–1.2 × its height. Ocelli small, POD/OOD 0.9–1.0. Ratio of genal median width to eye median width (lateral view) 0.5. Ratio of eye median width to half width of frons (frontal view) 0.6–0.7. Clypeus longitudinally convex, with straight or weakly emarginate anterior border and narrow smooth rim (Fig. 62). Flagellomere 1 length 3.8 × its width. Relation of scape, pedicel and first two flagellomeres 32–40: 15: 46–57: 39–51. Apical flagellomere acuminate. Mesosoma length dorsally 1.4–1.5 × its width. Pronotum median length 0.4 × its median width, posterior pronotal border obtuse-angulate. Metanotum median length 1.8 × metapostnotum median length. Metapostnotum as in Fig. 82. Spines of tarsal comb short, protarsomere 1 with three spines of tarsal comb, tarsomere 2 with two spines, tarsomere 3 with one spine, tarsomeres 4 and 5 without spines; apical spine of protarsomere 1 0.4–0.5 × length of protarsomere 2; apical spine of tarsomere 2 0.5–0.7 × length of tarsomere 3. Wings infuscated with darker apical portion, venation of fore wing as in Fig. 104.</p><p>Frons with 1 long and 2–3 short erect dark brown setae. Fore coxa anteriorly, T6, S2–S6 apically with long erect dark brown scattered setae. Gena and propleura with denser long erect soft pale brown setae. Pronotum dorsally, mesoscutum, scutellum, and metanotum with a few erect setae. Clypeus with six long erect dark brown strong setae. Each side of propodeum with 3–4 long erect setae. Head, mesosoma, propodeum, legs (except coxae posteriorly) with gray-brownish micropubescence. Coxae posteriorly with silver pubescence. Metasoma with gray micropubescence. Body regularly micropunctate; frons matt puncticulate. Body and legs black. Mandible pale brown medially, dark brown basally and apically; T1 (except basal portion) and T2 (except apical portion) ferruginous-red.</p><p>Type material. Paratypes. RUSSIA, Primorskiy Terr.: 2 3, Sukhanovka, 18.VIII.1987 (Lelej); 1 3, Zanadvoriovka, 23.VI.1987 (Lelej); 2 3, Vladivostok, 27.V.1978, 20.V.1987 (Lelej); 1 3, Volno-Nadezhdinskoe, 11.IX.1976 (Lelej); 1 3, 20 km NW Lazo, Lazovka River, 15.VI.1986 (Lelej); 1 3, 18 km SW Krounovka, 29.VII.1990 (Lelej). Khabarovsk Terr.: 1 3, 15 km W Smidovichi, 21.VIII.1982 (Lelej). Amurskaya Prov.: 1 3, Arkhara, 9.VI.1987 (Lelej). Magadan Prov.: 2 3, Seimchan, 24.VII.1975 (Marshakov). Chukotka: 1 3, Omolon River, 180 km N Omolon, 23.VII.1976 (Marshakov). Buryatia: 2 3, Naushki, 5.VIII.1984 (Lelej)]. Additional material. RUSSIA. Primorskiy Terr.: 2 3, Novokachalinsk, 24.VII.1995, 21–22.VII.2010; 1 3, Razdolnoe, 2.V.1993; 1 3, 10 km SW Sokolchi, 23.VII.1993; 1 3, Brovnichi, 7.VI.1994; 1 Ƥ, Zanadvorovka, 22.VI.1987; 1 Ƥ, Dersu, 24.VIII.1991. Khabarovsk Terr.: 1 3, 40 km N Komsomolsk-on-Amur, 10.VI.1995. Magadan Prov.: 1 Ƥ, Aborigen, 17.VII.1981. Buryatia: 1 3, Kyakhta, 30.V.2008 [IBSS].</p><p>Distribution. Russia (Primorskiy Terr., Khabarovsk Terr., Amurskaya Prov., Magadan Prov., Chukotka; Buryatia) (Lelej 1995).</p><p>Biology. Inhabits different biotopes: glades in broad-leaved forest, steppe areas, sandy shores along lakes and rivers.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7F73F82BFFA2FF9DFF58C5E67AF44786	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Loktionov, Valery M.;Lelej, Arkady S.	Loktionov, Valery M., Lelej, Arkady S. (2011): Review of the subgenus Ammosphex Wilcke, 1942 of the genus Arachnospila Kincaid, 1900 (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) of the Russian Far East and East Siberia. Zootaxa 3137: 1-30, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.202611
7F73F82BFFA3FF9CFF58C5E678F9461E.text	7F73F82BFFA3FF9CFF58C5E678F9461E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Arachnospila (Ammosphex) kurzenkoi Lelej 1995	<div><p>Arachnospila (Ammosphex) kurzenkoi Lelej, 1995</p><p>(Figs 11, 12, 44, 63, 83, 105)</p><p>Arachnospila (Ammosphex) kurzenkoi Lelej, 1995: 245, 3 (holotype, 3, Irkutsk Prov., Angarsk, 11.VI.1983 (Nemkov) [IBSS], examined).</p><p>Diagnosis of male. The male of this species is easily distinguished from other males of Arachnospila (Ammosphex) abnormis -species group (hypopygium ventro-preapically with tuft of long erect setae medially) by having hypopygium with two rows of soft setae (not bristles) baso-laterally (Figs 11, 12 vs. 1–10). Genitalia as in Fig. 44.</p><p>Diagnosis of female. The female of this species is similar to that of Arachnospila (Ammosphex) yasumatsui Wolf and Móczár, 1972 in having lateral surface of propodeum without any long erect setae and by very short anterior side of 3r-m cell of fore wing (sometimes 3r-m cell petiolate) (Fig. 105), but differs by having apical spine of first protarsomere 0.5–0.6 × length of second protarsomere (0.7–0.8 × in A. (A.) yasumatsui). Clypeus as in Fig. 63. Metapostnotum as in Fig. 83.</p><p>Description. FEMALE (hitherto unknown). Body length 5.8–8.5 mm. Fore wing length 4.3–6.0 mm. Head width 1.1 × its height. Ocelli small, POD/OOD 1.0–1.1. Ratio of genal median width to eye median width (lateral view) 0.5–0.7. Ratio of eye median width to half width of frons (frontal view) 0.6–0.7. Clypeus weakly longitudinally convex, anterior border weakly emarginate with broad smooth rim, which not narrowed medially (Fig. 63). Flagellomere 1 length 3.4–3.8 × its width. Relation of scape, pedicel and first two flagellomeres 32–35: 13–14: 35–40: 30–35. Apical flagellomere acuminate. Mesosoma length dorsally 1.5–1.6 × its width. Pronotum median length 0.4–0.5 × its median width, posterior pronotal border obtuse-angulate. Metanotum median length 1.5–1.6 × metapostnotum median length. Metapostnotum shiny with transverse striae. Metapostnotum posterior border with or without small smooth median triangle (Fig. 83). Spines of tarsal comb short, protarsomere 1 with three spines of tarsal comb, tarsomere 2 with two spines, tarsomere 3 with one spine, tarsomeres 4 and 5 without spines; apical spine of protarsomere 1 0.5–0.6 × length of protarsomere 2; apical spine of tarsomere 2 0.6–0.8 × length of tarsomere 3. Wings slightly infuscated with weakly darker apical portion, venation of fore wing as in Fig. 105.</p><p>Gena, propleura with long erect scattered gray setae. Fore coxa, S2–S6, T6 with more sparse long erect brown setae. Clypeus, vertex, pronotum posteriorly, scutum with long erect sparse brown setae. Mandible with 2–3 long curved and a few short brown or pale brown setae. Frons and propodeum lacking setae. Lower part of face, sides of mesosoma, propodeum, coxae posteriorly with iridescent mainly silver-gray pubescence. Mesosoma dorsally, coxae anteriorly, legs and most part of metasoma with brownish micropubescence. Frons usually without pubescence or with sparse brownish micropubescence. Body regularly micropunctate; frons puncticulate. Body and legs black. Mandible pale brown medially and dark brown apically; T1 (except basal portion), T2 and basal part of T3 ferruginous-red.</p><p>Type material. Paratype, 1 3, RUSSIA, Buryatia, Kyakhta, 28.VII.1977 (Lelej). Additional material. RUS- SIA. Transbaikalskiy Terr.: 1 3, Chita, 28.VII.1984. Buryatia: 3 Ƥ 3 3, Gusinoe Lake, Baraty, 6, 7.VIII.1984, 26.VII.2007; 3 Ƥ 1 3, Naushki, 4.VIII.1984, 30.VII.2007. Irkutsk Prov.: 3 Ƥ 2 3, 15 km E Ust-Orda, Ordinsk, 1, 2, 4.VIII.1994 [IBSS].</p><p>Distribution. Russia (*Transbaikalskiy Terr., Buryatia, Irkutsk Prov.).</p><p>Biology. Inhabits steppe biotopes (Lelej 1995).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7F73F82BFFA3FF9CFF58C5E678F9461E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Loktionov, Valery M.;Lelej, Arkady S.	Loktionov, Valery M., Lelej, Arkady S. (2011): Review of the subgenus Ammosphex Wilcke, 1942 of the genus Arachnospila Kincaid, 1900 (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) of the Russian Far East and East Siberia. Zootaxa 3137: 1-30, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.202611
7F73F82BFFA3FF9BFF58C30579B4449E.text	7F73F82BFFA3FF9BFF58C30579B4449E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Arachnospila (Ammosphex) kuwayamai (Ishikawa 1966)	<div><p>Arachnospila (Ammosphex) kuwayamai (Ishikawa, 1966)</p><p>(Figs 9, 10, 41, 64, 84, 106)</p><p>Pompilus (Ammosphex) kuwayamai Ishikawa, 1966: 87, figs 3, 4, Ƥ (holotype, Ƥ, "Kotankesi, Is. Kunashiri, 18–19.VIII.1940 (Kuwayama, Sugihara)" [Kuril Islands: Kunashir, Alyohino], [National Museum of Nature and Science, Tokyo], examined).</p><p>Arachnospila (Ammosphex) kuwayamai: Lelej 1995: 245, 3; 2000: 623; 2005: 128, Ƥ 3; Loktionov 2011: 83.</p><p>Pompilus (Ammosphex) hirsutifrons Ishikawa, 1966: 89, figs 5–8, Ƥ, 3 (holotype, 3, "Karuizawa, env. of Minenochaya, about 1400 m, Nagano Pref., 1.VIII.1950, R. Ishikawa [Japan, Honshu], [National Museum of Nature and Science, Tokyo], examined). Junior subjective synonym of Pompilus (Ammosphex) kuwayamai Ishikawa, 1966 according to Lelej 1995: 245.</p><p>Arachnospila (Ammosphex) hirsutifrons: Shimizu 1996: 510 .</p><p>Diagnosis of male. The male of this species is easily distinguished from other males of Arachnospila (Ammosphex) abnormis -species group (hypopygium ventro-preapically with tuft of long erect setae medially) by roof-like hypopygium without any row of setae or bristles baso-laterally (Figs 9, 10 vs. 1–8, 11, 12). The male of this species differs from very similar A. (A.) kurentzovi Lelej, 1995 by having hypopygium rounded apically (acuminate apically in A. (A.) kurentzovi) (Fig. 9 vs. 7). Genitalia as in Fig. 41.</p><p>Diagnosis of female. The female of this species is similar to that of Arachnospila (Ammosphex) abnormis (Dahlbom, 1842) by having apical spine of first protarsomere more than 0.5 of protarsomere 2 in length, by shiny frons, by ratio of first flagellomere length to its width 3.2–3.9, and by protarsomere 1 with three spines, but clearly differs by curved 2rs-m vein of fore wing (straight 2rs-m vein in A. (A.) abnormis) (Fig. 106 vs. 95). Clypeus as in Fig. 64. Metapostnotum as in Fig. 84.</p><p>Material examined. RUSSIA. Sakhalin: 24 Ƥ 6 3, 6 km E Shebunino, 4–6.VIII.2004; 1 Ƥ, Sokol, 21.VIII.2003; 1 Ƥ, Tunaicha Lake, 17.VII.2002; 3 Ƥ 1 3, Val, 14.VIII.2003; 8 Ƥ, 75 km S Okha, Sabo River, 14.VIII.2003; 1 Ƥ, 15 km E Piltun, 7.VIII.2003; 1 Ƥ, Pomr Bay, 13.VIII.2003; 1 Ƥ, 20 km SW Nogliki, 3.VIII.2003; 3 Ƥ, Sakhalinskiy Bay, Lyugi, 11, 12.VIII.2001; 1 Ƥ, Levenorn Cape, 21.VIII.2001; 1 Ƥ, Poronaisky Reserve, 3.VIII.1991; 3 Ƥ 3 3, Kostromskoe, 15, 17.VIII.1978; 1 Ƥ 3 3, Starodubskoe, 1.VIII.1978; 1 Ƥ 3 3, Ozerskiy, 19.VII.1978; Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, 5.VIII.1975; 1 Ƥ 1 3, Krasnogorsk, Ainskoe Lake, 21.VII.2003. Iturup: 6 Ƥ 2 3, Kuibyshevskiy Bay, 13.VIII.1999; 1 Ƥ 3 3, Drakon Cape, 2.VIII.1998; 15 Ƥ 13 3, Dobroye Nachalo Bay, 22.VIII.1996, 14.VIII.1999; 1 3, Blagodatnoe Lake, 1.VIII.1998. Shikotan: 21 Ƥ 6 3, Gorobets Bay, 18.VIII.1998. Kunashir: 17 Ƥ 10 3, Yuzhno-Kurilsk, 3, 26.VIII.1980, 18, 19.VIII.1989, 25.VIII.1996, 26.VII.1998; 22 Ƥ 14 3, Alyohino, 14–16.VIII.1980, 18.VIII.1982, 19.VIII.1999; 59 Ƥ 35 3, Peschanoe Lake, 30.VIII.1975, 17, 18.VIII.1980, 6.VIII.1989; 4 Ƥ 3 3, 9 km S Yuzhno-Kurilsk, Kislaya River, 27.VII, 21.VIII.1989; 24 Ƥ 27 3, 7 km S Lagunnoe Lake, 12, 13, 15.VIII.1989; 8 Ƥ 7 3, Stolbchatyi Cape, 28.VII.1989, 9–11.VIII.1989; 22 Ƥ 33 3, Tretyakovo, 21, 22.VIII.1980, 7, 8.VIII.1989; 2 Ƥ 1 3, Sernovodsk, 23.VII.1981, 29.VII.1989; 1 Ƥ, Mendeleyevo, 29.VII.1982; 3 Ƥ 2 3, Goryacheye Lake, 9, 11, 18.VIII.1980. JAPAN. 1 Ƥ, Hokkaido, Kushiro, Ponromuri, 5.VII.1992; 1 Ƥ 1 3, Honshu, Mt. Kinpusan, Minamisaku-gun (Nagano), 31.VII– 2.VIII.1986 (A. Shimizu) [IBSS].</p><p>Distribution. Russia (Sakhalin, Kuril Islands: Iturup, Kunashir, Shikotan), Japan (Hokkaido, Honshu) (Lelej 1995).</p><p>Biology. Inhabits sandy shores along lakes, rivers and by the sea.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7F73F82BFFA3FF9BFF58C30579B4449E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Loktionov, Valery M.;Lelej, Arkady S.	Loktionov, Valery M., Lelej, Arkady S. (2011): Review of the subgenus Ammosphex Wilcke, 1942 of the genus Arachnospila Kincaid, 1900 (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) of the Russian Far East and East Siberia. Zootaxa 3137: 1-30, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.202611
7F73F82BFFA4FF9AFF58C1857AFA425E.text	7F73F82BFFA4FF9AFF58C1857AFA425E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Arachnospila (Ammosphex) mongolica Moczar 1968	<div><p>Arachnospila (Ammosphex) mongolica Móczár, 1968</p><p>(Figs 13, 14, 43, 65, 69, 85, 90, 107, 114)</p><p>Arachnospila (Holarctopompilus) luctuosa mongolica Móczár, 1968: 429, Ƥ 3 (holotype, Ƥ, " Mongolia: Central aimak, Kerulen, 40 km O v. Somon Bajandelger, 1400 m, Exp. Dr. Kaszab, 1965, Nr. 304, 26.VII.1965 " [Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest]).</p><p>Arachnospila (Ammosphex) mongolica: Lelej 1995: 245, 3; Loktionov 2011: 83.</p><p>Arachnospila mongolica: Zonstein 2002: 138, 3.</p><p>Diagnosis of male. The male of this species clearly differs from other males by having flat hypopygium with dense long erect setae (Figs 13, 14 vs. 1–12, 15–37). Genitalia as in Fig. 43.</p><p>Diagnosis of female. The female of this species is distinguished from other females of the subgenus Ammosphex by having ratio of eye width to half frontal width 0.8 and less (0.9 and more in A. (A.) anceps (Wesmael, 1851) and A. (A.) wolfi Lelej, 1995), by protarsomere 1 with three short spines of tarsal comb (with four long spines in A. (A.) kaszabi Wolf and Móczár, 1972), by first flagellomere length 4.3 × and less its width (4.4 × in A. (A.) zonsteini sp. nov.), by apical flagellomere length almost 3 × its width (2 × in A. (A.) orientausa sp. nov.), and by mesopleuron and propodeum with brownish micropubescence (silver or gray micropubescence in other females). Clypeus as in Fig. 65. Metapostnotum as in Fig. 85. Venation of fore wing as in Fig. 107.</p><p>Material examined. RUSSIA. Primorskiy Terr.: 1 Ƥ 1 3, Khasan, 26.VI.2010; 1 3, Ryazanovka, 15.VII.1992; 1 3, 20 km N Plastun, 30.VII.1986; 6 3, Anisimovka, 3, 4.VII.1982, 20.VII.1992; 2 Ƥ 4 3, Brovnichi, 4, 6.VI.1994; 3 Ƥ 6 3, Lazovsky Reserve, 11–17.VII.2008; 1 3, 18 km SW Krounovka, 29, 30.VII.1990; 2 3, Barabash-Levada, 28, 29.VI.1978; 1 3, Evseyevka, 20.VI.1981; 3 3, 20 km N Plastun, 30.VII.1986; 1 3, Cheremukhovaya River, 20.VII.1987. Amurskaya Prov.: 1 Ƥ, Blagoveschensk, 16.VIII.1982; 1 Ƥ 1 3, Svobodnyi Trud, 11.VIII.1982. Sakhalin: 2 Ƥ 1 3, Val, 14.VIII.2003; 1 Ƥ, 20 km SW Nogliki, Tym River, 31.VII.2002. Transbaikalskiy Terr.: 4 Ƥ 3 3, 30 km SW Borzya, 20, 21.VII.1977; 1 3, Durbachi, 23.VII.1984; 1 3, Khoranhoi, 2.VIII.1977; 1 Ƥ, Chita, Peschanka, 28.VII.1984 [IBSS]. Buryatia: 3 Ƥ, Gusinoye Lake, Baraty, 25, 26.VII.2007; 20 Ƥ, Selenduma, 20, 21.V.2008; 3 Ƥ, Ust-Kiran, Chikoy River, 27.V.2008. Irkutsk Prov.: 1 3, Bolshie Koty, 12.VIII.1983; 4 Ƥ 2 3, 15 km E Ust-Orda, Ordinsk, 2–5.VIII.1994 [IBSS].</p><p>Distribution. Russia (Primorskiy Terr., *Amurskaya Prov., Sakhalin; Transbaikalskiy Terr., Buryatia, Irkutsk Prov.), Mongolia, East Kazakhstan (Lelej 2005), Kyrgyzstan (Zonstein 2002).</p><p>Biology. Inhabits steppe areas and sandy shores along rivers and sea.</p><p>Remarks. One female of Arachnospila (Ammosphex) mongolica from Transbaikalia somewhat differs from other examined females by the sculpture of anterior part of clypeus and by somewhat longer and denser setae on the frons and propodeum laterally. We regard these characters as variable and figure this specimen (Figs 69, 90, 114).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7F73F82BFFA4FF9AFF58C1857AFA425E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Loktionov, Valery M.;Lelej, Arkady S.	Loktionov, Valery M., Lelej, Arkady S. (2011): Review of the subgenus Ammosphex Wilcke, 1942 of the genus Arachnospila Kincaid, 1900 (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) of the Russian Far East and East Siberia. Zootaxa 3137: 1-30, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.202611
7F73F82BFFA5FF99FF58C7C57F2741CE.text	7F73F82BFFA5FF99FF58C7C57F2741CE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Arachnospila (Ammosphex) mongolopinata Wolf 1981	<div><p>Arachnospila (Ammosphex) mongolopinata Wolf, 1981</p><p>(Figs 24, 25, 49, 66, 86, 108, 109)</p><p>Arachnospila opinata mongolopinata Wolf, 1981: 199, 3 (holotype, 3, "MVR, Uvs-aimak, Charchiraa-uul, 30 km S Ulaangom, Umgeb. Kurort, Steppe, 1340 m NN, Stat. I, 5–22.6.[19]78" [Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg], examined).</p><p>Arachnospila (Ammosphex) mongolopinata: Lelej 1995: 245, 3; 2005: 128, Ƥ; Loktionov 2011: 83.</p><p>Diagnosis of male. The male of this species is similar to males of Arachnospila (Ammosphex) zonsteini sp. nov. and A. (A.) orientausa sp. nov. by having hypopygium distinctly narrowed subbasally, but clearly differs from the former by lacking baso-lateral tuft of setae (Figs 24, 25 vs. 28, 29) and by narrow volsella (very broad in A. (A.) zonsteini) (Fig. 49 vs. 45), and differs from the latter by having hypopygium rounded apically (emarginated apically in A. (A.) orientausa) (Fig. 24 vs. 26).</p><p>Diagnosis of female. The female of this species is similar to females of Arachnospila (Ammosphex) subvittata (F. Morawitz, 1889) and A. (A.) eoabnormis Lelej, 1995 by having mesopleuron and propodeum with brownish micropubescence and by frons and lateral surface of propodeum with scattered short erect whitish setae, but differs from both of them by having 2r-m cell of fore wing narrower than 3r-m cell (2r-m cell of fore wing wider than 3rm cell in A. (A.) subvittata or equal to 3r-m cell in width in A. (A.) eoabnormis) (Fig. 109 vs. 101, 115, 116). Clypeus as in Fig. 66. Metapostnotum as in Fig. 86.</p><p>Description. FEMALE (hitherto unknown). Body length 7.1–10.5 mm. Fore wing length 5.6–7.7 mm. Head width 1.2 × its height. Ocelli small, POD/OOD 1.0–1.1. Ratio of genal median width to eye median width (lateral view) 0.5–0.7. Ratio of eye median width to half width of frons (frontal view) 0.6–0.7. Clypeus longitudinally convex with weakly emarginate anterior border and with smooth rim, as in Fig. 66. Flagellomere 1 length 3.7–4.0 × its width. Relation of scape, pedicel and first two flagellomeres 30–40: 15–17: 43–56: 38–45. Apical flagellomere acuminate. Mesosoma length dorsally 1.4–1.5 × its width. Pronotum median length 0.3–0.4 × its median width, posterior pronotal border obtuse-angulate. Metanotum median length 1.6–1.9 × metapostnotum median length. Metapostnotum as in Fig. 86. Spines of tarsal comb short, protarsomere 1 with three spines of tarsal comb, tarsomere 2 with two spines, tarsomere 3 with 1–2 spines, tarsomeres 4 and 5 without spines; apical spine of protarsomere 1 0.4–0.6 × length of protarsomere 2; apical spine of tarsomere 2 0.4–0.6 × length of tarsomere 3. Wings infuscated with darker apical portion, venation of fore wing as in Figs 108, 109.</p><p>Frons usually with 4–12 long erect dark brown setae. Pronotum, fore coxa anteriorly, T6, S2–S6 apically with long erect rare dark brown setae. Gena and propleura with denser long erect pale brown setae. Scutellum with three long erect dark brown setae. Clypeus with 3–5 long erect strong dark brown setae. Each side of propodeum with 3– 10 long and short erect thin setae. Head, mesosoma, propodeum, legs (except coxae posteriorly) with gray-brownish (predominantly brownish) micropubescence. Coxae posteriorly with brownish or silver pubescence. Metasoma with gray micropubescence. Body regularly micropunctate. Body and legs black. Mandible usually pale brown medially, dark brown basally and apically; T1 (except basal portion) and T2 (completely or except apical portion) ferruginous-red.</p><p>Material examined. RUSSIA. Primorskiy Terr.: 1 Ƥ 4 3, 20 km NW Lazo, Lazovka River, 15.VI.1986; 1 3, 30 km E Spassk, 27.VI.1985; 1 Ƥ, Evseyevka, 21.VI.1978; 1 Ƥ 1 3, Dvoryanka, 3.VII.2009; 1 3, 70 km SE Chuguevka, 15.VII.2010; 1 3, Livadia, 22.VI.1981; 2 3, Lyalichi, 27.VI.1986; 1 Ƥ, Barabash-Levada, 8.VII.1986; 2 3, 20 km S Barabash-Levada, 13.VII.1974, 6.VII.1986; 1 3, Andreyevka, 10.VI.2003; 2 Ƥ 1 3, 15 km NNW Margaritovka, 14.VI.1986; 1 3, Anisimovka, 27.VI.1997; 1 Ƥ, Nesterovka, 5.VII.1986. Sakhalin: 1 Ƥ, 50 km SE Uglegorsk, 22.VII.2003; 1 Ƥ, 40 km E Zonalnoe, Tym River, 2.VIII.2002 [IBSS].</p><p>Distribution. Russia (Primorskiy Terr., Amurskaya Prov., Sakhalin), Mongolia (Mongolian and Gobi Altai) (Lelej 2005).</p><p>Biology. Inhabits glades in broad-leaved and oak forests and also sandy-stone shores along rivers.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7F73F82BFFA5FF99FF58C7C57F2741CE	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Loktionov, Valery M.;Lelej, Arkady S.	Loktionov, Valery M., Lelej, Arkady S. (2011): Review of the subgenus Ammosphex Wilcke, 1942 of the genus Arachnospila Kincaid, 1900 (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) of the Russian Far East and East Siberia. Zootaxa 3137: 1-30, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.202611
7F73F82BFFA6FF87FF58C75579604165.text	7F73F82BFFA6FF87FF58C75579604165.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Arachnospila (Ammosphex) orientausa Loktionov and Lelej	<div><p>Arachnospila (Ammosphex) orientausa Loktionov and Lelej, sp. nov.</p><p>(Figs 26, 27, 50, 67, 87, 110, 111)</p><p>Diagnosis of male. The male of this species is very similar to that of Arachnospila (Ammosphex) ausa (Tournier, 1890) by having similar shape of hypopygium, but clearly differs by having apical half of volsella with short setae (without setae in A. (A.) ausa), by penial valve apically without spicules (with three spicules in A. (A.) ausa), by gonostyli subbasally with short erect setae (with long erect setae in A. (A.) ausa), by ferruginous-red T2 basally only (ferruginous-red T1, T2 and basal portion of T 3 in A. (A.) ausa). The differences from other males of the subgenus Ammosphex, which are distributed in the Russian Far East and East Siberia, are given in the key below.</p><p>Diagnosis of female. The female of this species is very similar to that of Arachnospila (Ammosphex) ausa (Tournier, 1890) by having shortened obtuse apical flagellomere and similar venation of fore wing, but is easily identified by having T2 basally ferruginous-red only (T1, T2 and basal portion of T3 ferruginous-red in A. (A.) ausa). The differences from other females of the subgenus Ammosphex, which are distributed in the Russian Far East and East Siberia, are given in the key below.</p><p>Description. MALE. Body length 6.4–8.4 mm (holotype 6.6 mm). Fore wing length 4.8–5.6 mm (holotype 5.0 mm). Head width 1.09–1.18 × its height. Ocelli small, POD/OOD 0.97–1.27. Ratio of genal median width to eye median width (lateral view) 0.46–0.59. Clypeus weakly convex, anterior border emarginate with narrow smooth rim. Labrum flat, anterior border straight. Flagellomere 1 length 1.92–2.30 × its width. Relation of scape, pedicel and two first flagellomeres 27–32: 11–15: 23–29: 25–29. Mesosoma length dorsally 1.43–1.53 × its maximum width. Pronotum median length 0.32–0.41 × its median width, posterior pronotal border angulate. Metanotum median length 1.4–1.7 × metapostnotum median length. Metapostnotum with transverse striae, its posterior border with smooth shiny triangle medially. Median length of propodeum 0.83–0.88 × maximum width of propodeum. Fore wing slightly infuscated with darker apical part, venation as in Fig. 110, 3r-m cell triangulate or petiolate. Hypopygium constricted subbasally, emarginated apically, apical half with short erect dense setae (Figs 26, 27). Genitalia as in Fig. 50.</p><p>Gena and propleura with erect scattered silver setae. Inner eye orbit near lateral ocellus with 2–3 long erect setae. Mandible with 1–2 strong and a few softer and shorter erect setae. Other body parts lacking setae. Lower part of face, sides of pronotum, pleurae, propodeum, hind coxae (posteriorly) with dense silver pubescence. Pronotum dorsally, mesoscutum, scutellum, and metanotum, legs and metasoma with iridescent brownish sparse pubescence. Body regularly micropunctate. Body and legs black, mandible brownish apically, T1 (laterally) and T2 (basally) ferruginous-red.</p><p>Description. FEMALE. Body length 8.4–8.5 mm. Fore wing length 5.7–6.6 mm. Head width 1.12–1.18 × its height. Ocelli small, POD/OOD 1.26–1.13. Ratio of genal median width to eye median width (lateral view) 0.5. Ratio of median eye width to half width of frons (frontal view) 0.7–0.8. Clypeus weakly longitudinally convex, anterior border weakly emarginate with smooth rim. Labrum flat, anterior border weakly emarginate. Flagellomere 1 length 4.17–4.28 × its width. Relation of scape, pedicel and first two flagellomeres 39–40: 14–15: 50–60: 43– 49. Apical flagellomere shortened and obtuse. Mesosoma length dorsally 1.2–1.4 × its width. Pronotum median length 0.3 × its median width, posterior pronotal border obtuse-angulate. Metanotum median length 1.5–1.7 × metapostnotum median length. Metapostnotum with transverse striae, its posterior border with median smooth shiny triangle. Median length of propodeum 0.8 × maximum width of propodeum. Spines of tarsal comb rather long, tarsomere 1 with three spines, tarsomere 2 with two spines, tarsomere 3 with one spine, tarsomeres 4 and 5 without spines; apical spine of tarsomere 1 0.8–0.9 × length of protarsomere 2; apical spine of tarsomeres 2 and 3 equal to tarsomeres 3 and 4 respectively in length. Wings weakly evenly infuscated, fore wing venation as in Fig. 111, 3r-m cell triangulate or petiolate.</p><p>Propleura and gena with erect silver scattered setae. Inner eye orbit near the ocelli with 1–2 long erect dark setae. Mandible with 4–7 long strong curved setae. Coxae with rare short erect setae. S5 and S6 with scattered long erect setae. Coxae posteriorly and propodeum baso-laterally with silver pubescence. Others body part with brownish micropubescence. Body regularly micropunctate. Body and legs black. Mandible pale brown medially and brown apically; basal half of T2 and S2 ferruginous-red.</p><p>Type material. Holotype, 3, RUSSIA, Lazovsky Reserve, Prosyolochnaya Bay, 13.VII.2008 (Loktionov) [IBSS]. Paratypes. RUSSIA, Primorskiy Terr.: 1 3, 7 km E Khasan, 6.VIII.1974 (Lelej); 1 3, the same place, 27.VIII.1986 (Lelej); 1 3, Lazovsky Reserve, Prosyolochnaya Bay, 16.VII.2006 (Nemkov); 1 Ƥ, Sukhanovka, pass, 18.VIII.1987 (Lelej); 1 3, the same place, 20.VII.1992 (Belyaev); 1 Ƥ, 10 km W Preobrazhenie, 17.VIII.1986 (Lelej); 1 3, Barabash-Levada, 30.VI.1978 (Lelej) [IBSS, ZIN].</p><p>Distribution. Russia (Primorskiy Terr.).</p><p>Etymology. The name is derived from Latin oriens, orientis (East) referring to the area where the species has been found and ausa, the name of a related European species.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7F73F82BFFA6FF87FF58C75579604165	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Loktionov, Valery M.;Lelej, Arkady S.	Loktionov, Valery M., Lelej, Arkady S. (2011): Review of the subgenus Ammosphex Wilcke, 1942 of the genus Arachnospila Kincaid, 1900 (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) of the Russian Far East and East Siberia. Zootaxa 3137: 1-30, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.202611
7F73F82BFFB8FF86FF58C4C6784A41F5.text	7F73F82BFFB8FF86FF58C4C6784A41F5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Arachnospila (Ammosphex) rasnitsyni Loktionov and Lelej	<div><p>Arachnospila (Ammosphex) rasnitsyni Loktionov and Lelej, sp. nov.</p><p>(Figs 22, 23, 55, 68, 88, 112, 113)</p><p>Diagnosis of male. The male of this species is very similar to that of Arachnospila (Ammosphex) kaszabi Wolf and Móczár, 1972 by having similar shape of hypopygium and by dense silver pubescence of the body, but clearly differs by having clypeus and sides of propodeum with long scattered setae (with short erect rare setae of lacking setae in A. (A.) kaszabi), by volsella with dense setae ventrally (rare setae in A. (A.) kaszabi) (Fig. 55 vs. 46). The differences from other males of the subgenus Ammosphex, which are distributed in the Russian Far East and East Siberia, are given in the key below.</p><p>Diagnosis of female. The female of this species is easily distinguished from other females of the subgenus Ammosphex by having propodeum with ∼ 50 long erect setae (~20 and less long or short erect setae or lacking setae in other females).</p><p>Description. MALE. Body length 9.6 mm. Fore wing length 8.0 mm. Head width 1.2 × its height. Ocelli small, POD/OOD 1.0. Ratio of genal median width to eye median width (lateral view) 0.3. Clypeus weakly convex, anterior border weakly emarginate with narrow smooth rim. Labrum flat, anterior border straight. Flagellomere 1 length 2.3 × its width. Relation of scape, pedicel and two first flagellomeres 32: 15: 36: 36. Mesosoma length dorsally 1.5 × its maximum width. Pronotum median length 0.4 × its median width, posterior pronotal border angulate. Pronotum distinctly broadened posteriorly, its minimum anterior width 0.8 × maximum posterior width. Metanotum median length 1.8 × metapostnotum median length. Metapostnotum matt with three distinct transverse striae near anterior border, posterior border without median smooth shiny triangle. Median length of propodeum 0.7 × maximum width of propodeum. Wings slightly infuscated with darker apical part, venation of fore wing as in Fig. 112. Hypopygium as in Figs 22, 23. Genitalia as in Fig. 55.</p><p>Frons, vertex, gena, propleura with long brown scattered erect setae. Sides of propodeum with long gray scattered erect setae. Pronotum dorsally with three long dark brown erect setae and a few short erect setae. Mandible with two long strong and a few softer and shorter erect setae. Scutellum with five long dark brown erect setae. Other body parts lacking setae. Lower part of face, gena, pronotum anteriorly, sides of mesonotum, propodeum, fore coxae, mid and hind coxae posteriorly with dense iridescent mainly silver pubescence. Mesonotum, mid and hind coxae, legs with sparse brownish pubescence. Metanotum with iridescent mainly brownish micropubescence. Body regularly micropunctate. Body and legs black. Mandible brownish apically; T1 (except basal portion), T2 and T3 basally ferruginous-red.</p><p>Description. FEMALE. Body length 10.5 mm. Fore wing length 7.5 mm. Head width 1.2 × its height. Ocelli small, POD/OOD 1.0. Ratio of genal median width to eye median width (lateral view) 0.5. Ratio of eye median width to half width of frons (frontal view) 0.8. Clypeus longitudinally convex, anterior border strongly emarginate with smooth rim narrowed medially (Fig. 68). Labrum flat, anterior border straight. Flagellomere 1 length 4.3 its width. Relation of scape, pedicel and first two flagellomeres 25: 8: 35: 30. Apical flagellomere acuminate. Mesosoma length dorsally 1.4 × its width. Pronotum median length 0.4 × its median width, posterior pronotal border obtuse-angulate. Metanotum median length 1.3 × metapostnotum median length. Metapostnotum shiny with transverse striae more distinct anteriorly, its posterior border with smooth triangle medially (Fig. 88). Spines of tarsal comb short, protarsomere 1 with three spines of tarsal comb, tarsomeres 2, 3 with two spines, tarsomere 4 with one spine and tarsomere 5 without spines; apical spine of protarsomere 1 0.4 × length of protarsomere 2; apical spine length of tarsomeres 2 and 3 0.8 × length of tarsomeres 3 and 4 respectively. Wings infuscated with darker apical portion, venation of fore wing as in Fig. 113.</p><p>Frons, vertex, clypeus, pronotum, fore coxae with long dark scattered erect setae. Gena, propleura, sides of propodeum with denser long dark erect setae. Mesopleuron ventro-laterally, femora, mid and hind coxae, S2–S6 and T6 with rare erect setae. Mandible with seven long curved setae. Head and propodeum with iridescent brownish-gray pubescence. Other parts of body with brownish micropubescence. Body regularly micropunctate. Body and legs black. Mandible pale brown medially and dark brown apically; T1 (except basal portion) and T2 ferruginous-red.</p><p>Type material. Holotype, 3, RUSSIA, Buryatia, Baraty, Gusinoye Lake, 26.VII.2007 (Lelej, Proshchalykin, Loktionov) [IBSS]. Paratype, 1 Ƥ with the same label [ZIN].</p><p>Distribution. Russia (Buryatia).</p><p>Biology. Inhabits steppe areas.</p><p>Etymology. Named after Alexandr P. Rasnitsyn, the world authority on Hymenoptera classification and evolution, and dedicated to him on his jubilee.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7F73F82BFFB8FF86FF58C4C6784A41F5	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Loktionov, Valery M.;Lelej, Arkady S.	Loktionov, Valery M., Lelej, Arkady S. (2011): Review of the subgenus Ammosphex Wilcke, 1942 of the genus Arachnospila Kincaid, 1900 (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) of the Russian Far East and East Siberia. Zootaxa 3137: 1-30, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.202611
7F73F82BFFB9FF86FF58C74C78A846F0.text	7F73F82BFFB9FF86FF58C74C78A846F0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Arachnospila (Ammosphex) subvittata (F. Morawitz 1889) F. Morawitz 1889	<div><p>Arachnospila (Ammosphex) subvittata (F. Morawitz, 1889)</p><p>(Figs 19, 56, 70, 90, 115, 116)</p><p>Pompilus subvittatus F. Morawitz, 1889: 118, 3 (lectotype, 3, "Kansu, Nan-pin, Pot[anin]" [China, Gansu], designated by Lelej &amp; Loktionov 2010: 2 [ZIN], examined).</p><p>Pompilus (Ammosphex) nagasei Ishikawa, 1966: 85, Ƥ (holotype, Ƥ, "Kamakura, Kanagawa Pref., 7.IV.1954, H. Nagase" [Japan, Honshu], examined). Junior subjective synonym of Pompilus subvittatus F. Morawitz, 1889 according to Lelej &amp; Loktionov 2010: 2.</p><p>Arachnospila (Ammosphex) nagasei: Lelej &amp; Yamane 1992: 106, Ƥ 3; Lelej et al. 1994: 142, 3; Lelej 1995: 246, 3; 2000: 623; Shimizu 1996: 510.</p><p>Arachnospila (Ammosphex) subvittata: Lelej &amp; Loktionov 2010: 2, Ƥ 3; Loktionov 2011: 83.</p><p>Diagnosis of male. The male of this species is easily distinguished from other males of the subgenus Ammosphex by having the hypopygium baso-laterally distinctly carinate (Fig. 19 vs. 1–18, 20–37). Genitalia as in Fig. 56.</p><p>Diagnosis of female. The female of this species is very similar to that of Arachnospila (Ammosphex) eoabnormis Lelej, 1995, but differs by having 2r-m cell of fore wing wider than 3r-m cell (2r-m cell equal to 3r-m cell in width in A. (A.) eoabnormis) (Figs 115, 116 vs. 100, 101). Clypeus as in Fig. 70. Metapostnotum as in Fig. 90.</p><p>Material examined. RUSSIA. Primorskiy Terr.: 1 3, Ryazanovka, 4.VI.1979; 3 3, Andreyevka, 26.VI, 17.VIII.1987, 1.VIII.1990; 1 Ƥ 7 3, Anisimovka, 20.VI.1975, 11.VI.1984, 7.VIII.1993, 30.V.1994, 15.VI.1997, 5.VIII.2010; 2 3, Lazo, 20, 23–29.VII.2007; 3 Ƥ 2 3, Lazovsky Reserve, 16, 20.VII.2006; 1 Ƥ 1 3, "Kedrovaya Pad" Reserve, 5, 19.VI.1997; 4 3, 15 km NNW Margaritovka, 14.VI.1986; 1 3, Brovnichi, 7.VI.1994; 4 3, Barabash-Levada, 8.IX.1978, 6.VI.1980; 4 3, Novokachalinsk, 17.VIII.1977, 29.VIII.1987, 22.VII.1995; 2 3, Spassk, 7.VI.1990; 2 3, Evseyevka, 28.VI.1985, 9.VI.1989; 1 3, Zhuravlevka, 29.V.1993; 1 3, Nesterovka, 5.VII.1986. Khabarovsk Terr.: 1 Ƥ 1 3, Machtovaya River, 6.VIII.2005. Amurskaya Prov.: 1 3, Semenovka, 5.VII.1975; 2 3, 5 km N Saskal, 13.VIII.1982; 1 3, Khinganskiy Reserve, 1.VII.1989. Jewish Autonomous Region: 1 3, Radde, 13.VII.2003; 1 3, Ekaterino-Nikolskoe, 17.VI.2005. Kuril Is.: Kunashir, 1 Ƥ 1 3, Yuzhno-Kurilsk, 28.VIII.1980; 2 Ƥ 2 3, Dubovoye, 8.VIII.1980, 31.VII.1989. Transbaikalskiy Terr.: 1 3, 20 km SSE Krasnokamensk, 5.VIII.2007. Buryatia: 1 3, Kyakhta, 30.V.2008. Irkutsk Prov.: 2 Ƥ 2 3, Angarsk, 12.VI, 21.VII.1983; 4 3, 15 km E Ust-Orda, Ordinsk, 5, 6, 8.VIII.1994, 16.VI.2000. JAPAN. 1 Ƥ 1 3, Shiratori-yama, 1300 m, Gokanoshô, Kumamoto Pref., Kyushu, 8.VIII.1991 [IBSS].</p><p>Distribution. Russia (Primorskiy Terr., Khabarovsk Terr., Amurskaya Prov., Jewish Autonomous Region, Kuril Islands: Kunashir; Irkutsk Prov., * Transbaikalskiy Terr.), Japan (Honshu, Kyushu), South Korea, China (Gansu) (Lelej &amp; Loktionov 2010).</p><p>Biology. Inhabits different biotopes: sandy-stone shores along rivers, glades in broad-leaved forest, sandy shores beside the sea, and also steppe areas.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7F73F82BFFB9FF86FF58C74C78A846F0	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Loktionov, Valery M.;Lelej, Arkady S.	Loktionov, Valery M., Lelej, Arkady S. (2011): Review of the subgenus Ammosphex Wilcke, 1942 of the genus Arachnospila Kincaid, 1900 (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) of the Russian Far East and East Siberia. Zootaxa 3137: 1-30, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.202611
7F73F82BFFB9FF81FF58C24E79C947B0.text	7F73F82BFFB9FF81FF58C24E79C947B0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Arachnospila (Ammosphex) tobiasi Loktionov and Lelej	<div><p>Arachnospila (Ammosphex) tobiasi Loktionov and Lelej, sp. nov.</p><p>(Figs 1, 2, 40, 71, 91, 117, 118)</p><p>Diagnosis of male. The male of this species is easily distinguished from other males of the subgenus Ammosphex by having hypopygium with well developed baso-lateral lobes (Figs 1, 2 vs. 3–12). Genitalia as in Fig. 40. The differences from other males of the subgenus Ammosphex, which are distributed in the Russian Far East and East Siberia, are given in the key below.</p><p>Diagnosis of female. The female of this species differs from other females of the subgenus Ammosphex by having ratio of eye width to half frontal width 0.8 and less (0.9 and more in Arachnospila (Ammosphex) anceps (Wesmael, 1851) and A. (A.) wolfi Lelej, 1995), by protarsomere 1 with three short spines of tarsal comb (four long spines in A. (A.) kaszabi Wolf and Móczár, 1972), by first flagellomere length 4.2–4.3 × its width (4.4 × and more in A. (A.) zonsteini Loktionov and Lelej, sp. nov.), by apical flagellomere length almost 3 × its width (2 × in A. (A.) orientausa sp. nov.), and by mesopleuron and propodeum with silver micropubescence (brownish micropubescence in other females).</p><p>Description. MALE. Body length 6.8 mm. Fore wing length 5.9 mm. Head width 1.1 × its height. Ocelli small, POD/OOD 1.0. Ratio of genal median width to eye median width (lateral view) 0.3. Clypeus weakly longitudinally convex, anterior border weakly emarginate with very narrow smooth rim. Flagellomere 1 length 2.0 × its width. Relation of scape, pedicel and two first flagellomeres 27: 13: 26: 27. Mesosoma length dorsally 1.5 × its maximum width. Pronotum median length 0.4 × its median width, posterior pronotal border angulate. Metanotum median length 1.5 × metapostnotum median length. Metapostnotum rather shiny than matt, anterior border with two transverse striae, other part rugulose, posterior border with median smooth shiny triangle. Wings slightly infuscated with darker apical part, venation of fore wing as in Fig. 117. Hypopygium with basal lobe, median longitudinal carina and preapical tuft of long setae (Figs 1, 2). Genitalia as in Fig. 40.</p><p>Frons with scattered long brown erect setae. Genae and propleura with denser long pale brown erect setae. Each side of propodeum with 7–10 long pale brown setae. Pronotum with a few long and short erect setae. Fore coxae with 2–3 short erect setae. Mandible with 1 long strong and a few softer erect setae. Lower part of face, mesosoma with dense silver pubescence. Body regularly micropunctate. Body and legs black. Mandible brownish apically; T1 (except basal portion) and T2 ferruginous-red.</p><p>Description. FEMALE. Body length 8.3 mm. Fore wing length 7.1 mm. Head width 1.1 × its height. Ocelli small, POD/OOD 1.0. Ratio of genal median width to eye median width (lateral view) 0.6. Ratio of eye median width to half width of frons (frontal view) 0.75. Clypeus longitudinally convex, anterior border weakly emarginate with broad smooth rim narrowed medially (Fig. 71). Labrum flat, anterior border straight. Flagellomere 1 length 4.2 × its width. Relation of scape, pedicel and first two flagellomeres 35: 12: 52: 45. Apical flagellomere acuminate. Mesosoma length dorsally 1.5 × its width. Pronotum median length 0.35 × its median width, posterior pronotal border obtuse-angulate. Metanotum median length 1.4 × metapostnotum median length. Metapostnotum matt with five transverse striae anteriorly and strigulate posteriorly, its posterior border with small smooth triangle medially (Fig. 91). Spines of tarsal comb short, tarsomere 1 with three spines of tarsal comb, tarsomeres 2, 3 with two spines, tarsomere 4 with one spine, and tarsomere 5 without spines; apical spine of tarsomere 1 0.6 × length of protarsomere 2; apical spine of tarsomere 2 0.7 × length of tarsomere 3; apical spine of tarsomere 3 0.6 × length of tarsomere 4. Wings weakly infuscated with darker apical portion, venation of fore wing as in Fig. 118.</p><p>Upper part of frons and fore coxa with scattered long dark erect setae. Gena and propleura with denser long pale brown erect setae. Each side of propodeum with seven long brown erect setae. Clypeus, mid coxa, S3–S6 and T6 with a few erect setae. Mandible with 3–4 long curved setae. Lower part of face, gena, pronotum antero-laterally, pleurae, propodeum, and coxae posteriorly with silver-gray pubescence. Upper part of frons, vertex, pronotum, mesoscutum, scutellum, coxae anteriorly, and legs with iridescent mainly brownish pubescence. Metanotum with gray micropubescence. Body regularly micropunctate. Body and legs black. Mandible pale brown medially and dark brown apically; T1 (except basal portion), T2 and basal part of T3 ferruginous-red.</p><p>Type material. Holotype, 3, RUSSIA, Buryatia, Naushki, Selenga River, 30.VII.2007 (Lelej, Proshchalykin, Loktionov) [IBSS]. Paratype, 1 Ƥ with the same label [ZIN].</p><p>Distribution. Russia (Buryatia).</p><p>Biology. Inhabits steppe areas.</p><p>Etymology. Named after Vladimir I. Tobias (1929–2011), the world authority in Braconidae, for his contributions to the taxonomy of Pompilidae .</p><p>FIGURES 95–125. Part of fore wing of female (95–97, 99–109, 111, 113–116, 118–123, 125) and male (98, 110, 112, 117, 124). 95. Arachnospila (Ammosphex) abnormis . 96, 97. A. (A.) anceps . 98. A. (A.) belokobylskii, holotype. 99. A. (A.) dschingis . 100, 101. A. (A.) eoabnormis . 102, 103. A. (A.) kaszabi . 104. A. (A.) kurentzovi . 105. A. (A.) kurzenkoi . 106. A. (A.) kuwayamai . 107. A. (A.) mongolica . 108, 109. A. (A.) mongolopinata . 110, 111. A. (A.) orientausa sp. nov. (110, holotype; 111, paratype). 112, 113. A. (A.) rasnitsyni sp. nov. (112, holotype; 113, paratype). 114. A. (A.) mongolica . 115, 116. A. (A.) subvittata . 117, 118. A. (A.) tobiasi sp. nov. (117, holotype; 118, paratype). 119. A. (A.) trivialis . 120, 121. A. (A.) wolfi . 122, 123. A. (A.) yasumatsui . 124, 125. A. (A.) zonsteini sp. nov. (124, holotype; 125, paratype).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7F73F82BFFB9FF81FF58C24E79C947B0	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Loktionov, Valery M.;Lelej, Arkady S.	Loktionov, Valery M., Lelej, Arkady S. (2011): Review of the subgenus Ammosphex Wilcke, 1942 of the genus Arachnospila Kincaid, 1900 (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) of the Russian Far East and East Siberia. Zootaxa 3137: 1-30, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.202611
7F73F82BFFBFFF80FF58C5E67FA5464D.text	7F73F82BFFBFFF80FF58C5E67FA5464D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Arachnospila (Ammosphex) trivialis (Dahlbom 1843) Dahlbom 1843	<div><p>Arachnospila (Ammosphex) trivialis (Dahlbom, 1843)</p><p>(Figs 17, 18, 47, 72, 92, 119)</p><p>Pompilus trivialis Dahlbom, 1843: 65, Ƥ (lectotype, Ƥ, Sweden, designated by Day 1979: 12 [Universitetets Zoologiska Institution, Lund, Sweden]).</p><p>Psammochares corruptor Haupt, 1927: 224, 3 [holotype, 3, "bei Triest", 24.IV.1896)]. Junior subjective synonym of Pompilus trivialis Dahlbom, 1843 according to Wahis 1986: 21.</p><p>Psammochares gibbus: Gussakovskij 1932: 44, 3.</p><p>Pompilus (Boreopompilus) trivialis insubricus Wolf, 1965a: 90, Ƥ 3 (holotype, Ƥ "Caslano, Tessin (Wahis)" [Switzerland]); Wolf 1966: 48, 52, 62, 85, Ƥ 3. Junior subjective synonym of Pompilus trivialis Dahlbom, 1843 according to Wahis 1986: 21.</p><p>Pompilus (Boreopompilus) trivialis: Wolf 1966: 48, 52, 64, 88, Ƥ 3.</p><p>Arachnospila (Boreopompilus) trivialis trivialis: Wolf 1972: 96, 108, 110, Ƥ 3.</p><p>Arachnospila (Ammosphex) trivialis: Tobias 1978: 128, 132, Ƥ 3; Day 1979: 12; Wahis 1986: 21; Lelej 1995: 246, 3; v.d. Smissen 1996: 87, 97, Ƥ 3; Loktionov 2011: 83; Wahis 2011.</p><p>Arachnospila trivialis: Zonstein 2002: 138, Ƥ 3.</p><p>Psammochares michalki Haupt in Blüthgen, 1961: 69, Ƥ, nom. nud.</p><p>Diagnosis of male. The male of this species is similar to males of Arachnospila (Ammosphex) yasumatsui Wolf and Móczár, 1972 and A. (A.) wolfi Lelej, 1995 by having flattened hypopygium with short erect scattered setae, but is easily distinguished from the former by having penial valve not narrowed preapically and rounded apically (Fig. 47 vs. 51), and differs from the latter by having penial valve less setose, not constricted preapically (Fig. 47 vs. 52), by metasomal segments 1 and 2 ferruginous-red (metasomal terga 1 and 2 at most with brown-reddish spot baso-laterally in A. (A.) wolfi). Genitalia as in Fig. 47.</p><p>Diagnosis of female. The female of this species differs from other females of the subgenus Ammosphex by having ratio of eye width to half frontal width 0.8 and less (0.9 and more in Arachnospila (Ammosphex) anceps (Wesmael, 1851) and A. (A.) wolfi Lelej, 1995), by protarsomere 1 with three short spines of tarsal comb (four long spines in A. (A.) kaszabi Wolf and Móczár, 1972), by first flagellomere length 3.2–3.9 × its width (4.1 × and more in other females), by apical flagellomere length almost 3 × its width (2 × in A. (A.) orientausa sp. nov.), and by mesopleuron and propodeum with silver or gray micropubescence (brownish micropubescence in some other females). Clypeus as in Fig. 72. Metapostnotum as in Fig. 92. Venation of fore wing as in Fig. 119.</p><p>Material examined. RUSSIA. Magadan Prov.: 2 3, lower part of Bulun River, 28.VI.1982; 1 Ƥ, Khatyngah River, 18–19.VII.1981. Chukotka: 4 Ƥ, Omolon River, 180 km N Omolon, 17, 23.VII, 12, 23.VIII. 1976. BELARUS. 2 Ƥ, Pinsk, 20.IX.1977 [IBSS].</p><p>Distribution. Russia (Kamchatka, Magadan Prov., *Chukotka; Siberia, European part), Ukraine, Belarus, Kazakhstan (Tobias 1978; Lelej 1995), Kyrgyzstan (Zonstein 2002), Albania, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Great Britain, Greece, Italy, Norway, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Near East (Wahis 2011).</p><p>Biology. The cleptoparasite of Arachnospila (Ammosphex) trivialis is the pompilid Evagetes crassicornis (Shuckard) (v.d. Smissen 2003).</p><p>The prey consists of spiders Pardosa C.L. Koch, Trochosa C.L. Koch (Lycosidae), Xysticus C.L. Koch (Thomisidae) and also Agelenidae, Clubionidae, Gnaphosidae (WiŠniowski 2009) .</p><p>Female nests in the ground mainly in pre-existing cavities, sometimes excavated in loose soil (WiŠniowski 2009).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7F73F82BFFBFFF80FF58C5E67FA5464D	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Loktionov, Valery M.;Lelej, Arkady S.	Loktionov, Valery M., Lelej, Arkady S. (2011): Review of the subgenus Ammosphex Wilcke, 1942 of the genus Arachnospila Kincaid, 1900 (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) of the Russian Far East and East Siberia. Zootaxa 3137: 1-30, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.202611
7F73F82BFFBFFF8FFF58C3EE7FAC449E.text	7F73F82BFFBFFF8FFF58C3EE7FAC449E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Arachnospila (Ammosphex) wolfi Lelej 1995	<div><p>Arachnospila (Ammosphex) wolfi Lelej, 1995</p><p>(Figs 34, 35, 52, 73, 93, 120, 121)</p><p>Arachnospila (Ammosphex) wolfi Lelej, 1995: 246, 3 (holotype, 3, Primorskiy Terr., 7 km E Khasan, 25.VIII.1977 (Lelej) [IBSS], examined); Loktionov 2011: 83.</p><p>Diagnosis of male. The male of this species resembles males of Arachnospila (Ammosphex) yasumatsui Wolf and Móczár, 1972 and A. (A.) trivialis (Dahlbom, 1843) by having flattened hypopygium with short erect scattered setae (Figs 34, 35), but clearly differs from the former by having penial valve not narrowed preapically and rounded apically (Fig. 52 vs. 51), and from the latter by having penial valve more setose, weakly constricted preapically (Fig. 52 vs. 47), and by T1, T2 at most with brown-reddish spot baso-laterally (T1, T2, S1, S2 ferruginous-red in A. (A.) trivialis). Genitalia as in Fig. 52.</p><p>Diagnosis of female. The female of this species is similar to that of Arachnospila (Ammosphex) anceps (Wesmael, 1851) by having ratio of eye width to half frontal width 0.9 and more, but differs by having frons matt and shagreened (shiny and smooth in A. (A.) anceps), by propodeum at most with a few short setae or lacking setae (with long erect sparse setae in A. (A.) anceps).</p><p>Description. FEMALE (hitherto unknown). Body length 7.0– 9.1 mm. Fore wing length 5.5–6.8 mm. Head width 1.1–1.2 × its height. Ocelli small, POD/OOD 1.2–1.3. Ratio of genal median width to eye median width (lateral view) 0.5–0.6. Ratio of eye median width to half width of frons (frontal view) 0.9–1.0. Clypeus weakly longitudinally convex, with straight anterior border and broad smooth rim, which is not narrowed medially (Fig. 73). Flagellomere 1 length 4.1–4.8 × its width. Relation of scape, pedicel and first two flagellomeres 31–33: 14–15: 44–55: 40–48. Apical flagellomere acuminate. Mesosoma length dorsally 1.3–1.4 × its width. Pronotum median length 0.4 × its median width, posterior pronotal border obtuse-angulate. Metanotum median length 1.1–1.3 × metapostnotum median length. Metapostnotum matt, with 3–5 striae anteriorly and strigulate posteriorly (Fig. 93). Spines of tarsal comb short, tarsomere 1 with three spines of tarsal comb, tarsomere 2 with two spines, tarsomere 3 with one spine, tarsomeres 4 and 5 without spines; apical spine of tarsomere 1 0.4–0.5 × length of protarsomere 2; apical spine of tarsomere 2 0.5–0.7 × length of tarsomere 3. Wings infuscated with darker apical portion, venation of fore wing as in Figs 120, 121.</p><p>Gena and propleura with scattered pale brown long erect setae. Fore coxa and S6 with more scattered brown long erect setae. Clypeus, vertex, pronotum posteriorly, mesoscutum with rare brown long erect setae. Mandible with 3–4 long curved brown or pale brown setae. Frons and propodeum lacking setae. Head and mesosoma with iridescent gray-brownish pubescence. Propodeum with silver pubescence. Legs and metasoma usually with brownish micropubescence. Body regularly micropunctate; frons matt, punctate. Body and legs black. Mandible pale brown medially and dark brown apically; T1 (except basal portion), basal half of T2 ferruginous-red.</p><p>Type material. Paratypes. RUSSIA, Primorskiy Terr.: 8 3, 7 km E Khasan, 7, 11.VIII.1976, 26.VIII.1986, 28.VIII.1988 (Lelej). Additional material. RUSSIA. Primorskiy Terr.: 7 Ƥ 1 3, 7 km E Khasan, 8.IX.1982, 26.VIII.1986, 26.VI.2010; 1 Ƥ, Nesterovka, 5.VII.1986; 5 Ƥ, Dvoryanka, 3, 4.VII.2009; 1 Ƥ, Barabash-Levada, 8.VII.1986 [IBSS].</p><p>Distribution. Russia (Primorskiy Terr.) (Lelej 1995).</p><p>Biology. Usually inhabits sandy shores beside the sea (Lelej 1995), sometimes glades in broad-leaved forest.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7F73F82BFFBFFF8FFF58C3EE7FAC449E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Loktionov, Valery M.;Lelej, Arkady S.	Loktionov, Valery M., Lelej, Arkady S. (2011): Review of the subgenus Ammosphex Wilcke, 1942 of the genus Arachnospila Kincaid, 1900 (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) of the Russian Far East and East Siberia. Zootaxa 3137: 1-30, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.202611
7F73F82BFFB0FF8EFF58C18578364339.text	7F73F82BFFB0FF8EFF58C18578364339.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Arachnospila (Ammosphex) yasumatsui Wolf and Moczar 1972	<div><p>Arachnospila (Ammosphex) yasumatsui Wolf and Móczár, 1972</p><p>(Figs 36, 37, 51, 74, 94, 122, 123)</p><p>Arachnospila (Boreopompilus) yasumatsui Wolf and Móczár, 1972: 246 (3), 256 (holotype, 3, " Mongolia, Chövsgöl aimak, 3 km W von Somon Burenchaan, 1650 m, 16.VII.1968 (Z. Kaszab)" [Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest], examined).</p><p>Arachnospila yasumatsui: Ma &amp; Li 2010: 76, Ƥ.</p><p>Diagnosis of male. The male of this species resembles males of Arachnospila (Ammosphex) wolfi Lelej, 1995 and A. (A.) trivialis (Dahlbom, 1843) by having flattened hypopygium with short erect scattered setae (Figs 36, 37), but clearly differs from both of them by having penial valve strongly narrowed preapically and acuminate apically (Fig. 51 vs. 47, 52). Genitalia as in Fig. 51.</p><p>Diagnosis of female. The female of this species resembles that of Arachnospila (Ammosphex) kurzenkoi Lelej, 1995 by having lateral surface of propodeum without any long erect setae and by very short anterior side of 3r-m cell of fore wing (sometimes 3r-m cell petiolate), but differs by having apical spine of first protarsomere 0.7–0.8 × length of second protarsomere (0.5–0.6 × in A. (A.) kurzenkoi).</p><p>Description. FEMALE (hitherto unknown). Body length 6.3–8.2 mm. Fore wing length 5.1–5.6 mm. Head width 1.1 × its height. Ocelli small, POD/OOD 1.0–1.4. Ratio of genal median width to eye median width (lateral view) 0.5–0.8. Ratio of eye median width to half width of frons (frontal view) 0.7–0.8. Clypeus weakly longitudinally convex, anterior border straight or weakly emarginate, with shiny rim (Fig. 74). Flagellomere 1 length 3.5– 4.0 × its width. Relation of scape, pedicel and first two flagellomeres 30–33: 11–12: 38–42: 35–37. Apical flagellomere acuminate. Mesosoma length dorsally 1.4–1.5 × its width. Pronotum median length 0.4 × its median width, posterior pronotal border obtuse-angulate. Metanotum median length 1.5–1.8 metapostnotum median length. Metapostnotum matt, with 2–3 transverse striae anteriorly and indistinctly strigulate posteriorly (Fig. 94). Spines of tarsal comb long, tarsomere 1 with three spines of tarsal comb, tarsomere 2 and 3 with two spines, tarsomere 4 with one spine, tarsomere 5 without spines; apical spine of tarsomere 1 0.7–0.8 × length of protarsomere 2; apical spine of tarsomeres 2 0.7–0.9 × length of tarsomere 3. Wings infuscated with darker apical portion, venation of fore wing as in Figs 122, 123.</p><p>Frons with 7–11 long erect dark brown setae. Fore coxa anteriorly with 5–7 long more strong erect dark brown setae. Gena and propleura with scattered pale brown or gray long erect setae. T6, S4–S6 apically with long erect dark brown setae. Propodeum lacking setae or with few short soft setae. Head, mesosoma and propodeum with iridescent gray-brownish sparse pubescence. Propodeum with silver pubescence. Legs with brownish micropubescence. Metasoma with gray micropubescence. Body regularly micropunctate; frons matt puncticulate, other parts of body finely shagreened. Body and legs black. Mandible pale brown medially and dark brown apically; T1 (except basal portion), basal half of T2 ferruginous-red.</p><p>Material examined. RUSSIA. Buryatia: 2 Ƥ 4 3, Gusinoye Lake, Baraty, 7.VIII.1984, 26.VII.2007; 3 3, Naushki, 5.VIII.1984, 31.V, 1.VI.2008; 2 3, Kyakhta, 28.VII.1977; 1 3, Ust-Kiran, 27.V.2008. Irkutsk Prov.: 1 3, Angarsk, 8.VIII.1994; 4 Ƥ 4 3, 15 km E Ust-Orda, Ordinsk, 31.VII, 1–4.VIII.1994 [IBSS].</p><p>Distribution. * Russia (Buryatia, Irkutsk Prov.), Mongolia, China (Hebei) (Wolf &amp; Móczár 1972; Ma &amp; Li 2010).</p><p>Biology. Inhabits steppe areas.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7F73F82BFFB0FF8EFF58C18578364339	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Loktionov, Valery M.;Lelej, Arkady S.	Loktionov, Valery M., Lelej, Arkady S. (2011): Review of the subgenus Ammosphex Wilcke, 1942 of the genus Arachnospila Kincaid, 1900 (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) of the Russian Far East and East Siberia. Zootaxa 3137: 1-30, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.202611
7F73F82BFFB1FF8DFF58C6FD7B1743ED.text	7F73F82BFFB1FF8DFF58C6FD7B1743ED.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Arachnospila (Ammosphex) zonsteini Loktionov and Lelej	<div><p>Arachnospila (Ammosphex) zonsteini Loktionov and Lelej, sp. nov.</p><p>(Figs 28, 29, 45, 75, 76, 124, 125)</p><p>Diagnosis of male. The male of the new species resembles males of Arachnospila (Ammosphex) mongolopinata Wolf, 1981 and A. (A.) orientausa sp. nov. by having hypopygium distinctly narrowed subbasally, but clearly differs from both of them by having hypopygium with tuft of setae baso-laterally (Fig. 28 vs. 24, 26) and by very broad volsella (Fig. 45 vs. 49, 50).</p><p>Diagnosis of female. The female of this species differs from other females of the subgenus Ammosphex by ratio of eye width to half frontal width 0.8 and less (0.9 and more in Arachnospila (Ammosphex) anceps (Wesmael, 1851) and A. (A.) wolfi Lelej, 1995), by first flagellomere length 3.2–3.9 × its width (4.1 × and more in other females), by apical flagellomere length almost 3 × its width (2 × in A. (A.) orientausa sp. nov.), by protarsomere 1 with three short spines of tarsal comb (four long spines in A. (A.) kaszabi Wolf and Móczár, 1972), and by mesopleuron and propodeum with silver micropubescence (brownish micropubescence in some other females).</p><p>Description. MALE. Body length 6.3–7.4 mm (holotype 7.4 mm). Fore wing length 5.0– 5.3 mm (holotype 5.3 mm). Head width 1.1 × its height. Ocelli small, POD/OOD 1.0. Ratio of genal median width to eye median width (lateral view) 0.4–0.5. Clypeus weakly longitudinally convex, anterior border straight or weakly emarginate, with narrow smooth rim. Flagellomere 1 length 2.0–2.2 × its width. Relation of scape, pedicel and two first flagellomeres 25: 13–14: 23–24: 27–29. Mesosoma length dorsally 1.5–1.6 × its maximum width. Pronotum median length 0.4–0.5 × its median width, posterior pronotal border angulate. Metanotum median length 1.4–1.5 × metapostnotum median length. Metapostnotum matt with 2–3 distinct transverse striae near anterior border, its posterior border with median smooth shiny triangle. Median length of propodeum 0.7–0.8 × maximum width of propodeum. Wings slightly infuscated with darker apical part, venation of fore wing as in Fig. 124. Hypopygium as in Figs 28, 29. Genitalia as in Fig. 45.</p><p>Frons with scattered long brown erect setae. Gena and propleura with denser long pale brown erect setae. Sides of propodeum with a few different length erect gray setae or lacking setae. Mandible with two long, strong and a few softer and shorter erect setae. Scutellum with four brownish erect setae. Lower part of face, gena, pronotum, pleurae, propodeum, fore coxae, mid and hind coxae posteriorly with dense silver pubescence. Mesoscutum, scutellum, and metanotum with sparse silver pubescence. Mid and hind coxae anteriorly with iridescent mainly brownish pubescence. Legs and metanotum with iridescent gray-brownish micropubescence. Body regularly micropunctate. Body and legs black. Mandible brownish apically; T1 (except basal portion), T2 and T3 basally ferruginous-red.</p><p>Description. FEMALE. Body length 6.7 mm. Fore wing length 5.6 mm. Head width 1.1 × its height. Ocelli small, POD/OOD 0.9. Ratio of genal median width to eye median width (lateral view) 0.65. Ratio of eye median width to half width of frons (frontal view) 0.65. Clypeus longitudinally convex, anterior border weakly emarginate with smooth rim, which is not narrowed medially (Fig. 75). Labrum flat, anterior border weakly emarginate. Flagellomere 1 length 3.8 × its width. Relation of scape, pedicel and first two flagellomeres 30: 12: 42: 35. Apical flagellomere acuminate. Mesosoma length dorsally 1.4 × its width. Pronotum median length 0.4 × its median width, posterior pronotal border obtuse-angulate. Metanotum median length 1.8 × metapostnotum median length. Metapostnotum shiny, with distinct transverse striae anteriorly, other part strigulate, posterior border with median small smooth triangle (Fig. 76). Spines of tarsal comb short, tarsomere 1 with three spines, tarsomeres 2, 3 with two spines, tarsomere 4 with one spine and tarsomeres 5 without spines; apical spine of tarsomere 1 0.5 × length of protarsomere 2; apical spine of tarsomeres 2 and 3 0.6 × length of tarsomeres 3 and 4 respectively. Wings weakly infuscated with darker apical portion, venation of fore wing as in Fig. 125.</p><p>Frons, vertex, clypeus, fore coxae, sides of propodeum, S5 and S6 with long brown scattered erect setae. Gena, propleura with denser long pale brown erect setae. Pronotum, mesonotum, mid and hind coxae, S2–S4 with rare mixed length setae. Scutellum with three long erect setae. Lower part of face with silver pubescence. Propodeum, mesopleura and coxae posteriorly with iridescent mainly gray micropubescence. Other parts of body with brownish micropubescence. Body regularly micropunctate. Body and legs black. Mandible pale brown medially and dark brown apically; T1 (except basal portion), T2 and T3 (baso-laterally) ferruginous-red.</p><p>Type material. Holotype, 3, RUSSIA, Buryatia, Kyakhta, 30.V.2008 (Loktionov) [IBSS]. Paratypes, 1 Ƥ 1 3 with the same label; 1 3, Buryatia, Naushki, 5.VIII.1984 (Lelej) [IBSS, ZIN].</p><p>Distribution. Russia (Buryatia).</p><p>Biology. Inhabits steppe areas.</p><p>Etymology. Named after Sergei L. Zonstein (Tel-Aviv University, Israel), for his contributions to the taxonomy of Pompilidae .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7F73F82BFFB1FF8DFF58C6FD7B1743ED	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Loktionov, Valery M.;Lelej, Arkady S.	Loktionov, Valery M., Lelej, Arkady S. (2011): Review of the subgenus Ammosphex Wilcke, 1942 of the genus Arachnospila Kincaid, 1900 (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) of the Russian Far East and East Siberia. Zootaxa 3137: 1-30, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.202611
