identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
DC82C0062D235FA08F17B1D83A9DD9EB.text	DC82C0062D235FA08F17B1D83A9DD9EB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Diplocheila (Diplocheila) erwini Allegro & Giachino 2021	<div><p>Diplocheila (Diplocheila) erwini sp. nov. Figures 5, 11, 17, 23, 30, 33</p><p>Type locality.</p><p>Cambodia, Kampong Chhnang, Khom Domnatpopol, Tonle Sap Lake.</p><p>Material examined.</p><p>Holotype: ♂, Cambodia, Kampong Chhnang Province, Khom Domnatpopol, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=104.6875&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=12.237223" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 104.6875/lat 12.237223)">Tonle Sap Lake</a>, 12°14'14"N, 104°41'15"E, (light trap), 21.V.2018, Rossi, Bernardi and Kong leg. (CAl).</p><p>Paratypes: (1 ♂ and 3 ♀♀); 1 ♀ same data as holotype; 1 ♂ Cambodia, Kampong Chhnang, Rolea B’ier District, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=104.66389&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=12.225277" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 104.66389/lat 12.225277)">Toulkrolanh Village</a>, 12°13'31"N, 104°39'50"E, light trap, 7.XI.2018, W. Rossi and V. Kong leg. ; 2 ♀♀, Cambodia, Kampong Chhnang, banks of Tonle Sap Lake, light trap, 17.V.2019, W. Rossi and V. Kong leg. (CAl, CGi) .</p><p>Diagnosis.</p><p>A medium-sized to small Diplocheila (ABL: 12-14 mm) of the Diplocheila polita group in the subgenus Diplocheila Diplocheila (sensu Ball 1959). It is easily distinguished from the other species of the group with a sexsetose labrum ( D. indus, D. laevigata, D. laevigotoides, and D. walterrossii sp. nov.) by the smaller body size (≤14 mm), the narrower and almost quadrangular pronotum (transverse in the four other species), with hind angles not protruding (protruding in D. indus), and by the morphology of the aedeagus.</p><p>Description.</p><p>Habitus: ABL: 12-14 mm (HT ♂ 13.5 mm). Body parallel-sided, moderately shiny, black with antennae and palpi piceous-brown (Fig. 5).</p><p>Head: almost quadrangular, glabrous except for the supraorbital setae, narrow in comparison with pronotum. Eyes markedly convex; a single supraorbital seta on each side. Dorsum with microsculpture not evident, only with scattered punctures visible at&gt;100 × magnification; frontal impressions short and superficial. Labrum symmetrically and deeply (LR = 0.78) emarginate, with six setigerous punctures on anterior margin (4 medial equidistant + 2 lateral on lobes). Clypeus trapezoid, distinctly concave anteriorly, with 1 seta on each side at anterolateral corner. Antennae moderately long, densely pubescent from segment 4, with terminal 2 articles surpassing base of pronotum; segments elongate, the second one short, as long as a half of first. Mandibles elongate, broad, approximately similar each another (the left with apical cutting edge more concave), with scrobe well-defined and glabrous and apex blunt; terebral tooth triangular and prominent. Labial and maxillary palps fusiform, with apices narrowly truncate.</p><p>Thorax: pronotum smooth, with very faint microsculpture evident at&gt;200 × magnification and with scattered punctures, subquadrate (PW/PL = 1.18), widest at middle (Fig. 11). Disk moderately convex. Sides from rectilinear to hardly rounded in anterior half; rectilinear or very slightly sinuate backwards. Hind angles rounded obtuse, provided with a postero-lateral seta. Posterior margin rectilinear between basal impressions, which are linear and markedly impressed; anterior margin with front angles nearly obsolete. A single lateral seta on each side just above middle. Lateral bead continuous, separated from the discal area by a narrow groove, only scarcely dilated before hind angles. Medial longitudinal impression fine, nearly reaching anterior and posterior margins; anterior transversal impression absent.</p><p>Elytra: moderately long (EL/EW = 1.59), parallel-sided, slightly convex and flattened on disk, widest at middle, with rounded shoulders and sides delicately sinuate before apex. Surface moderately shiny; microsculpture evident only at high magnification (&gt;100 ×), consisting of fine, slightly transverse meshes. Epipleura without any distinct external plicae ("uncrossed epipleura"). Intervals moderately convex, smooth; striae deeply impressed on the whole length, distinctly punctate. Parascutellar stria present; scutellar setigerous pore present at base of stria 1, just before conjunction with stria 2. Basal margin complete. Discal setigerous punctures absent; umbilicate series of setigerous punctures continuous, not interrupted at middle. Hind wings fully developed.</p><p>Ventral surface (thorax and abdomen): prosternum and proepisterna glabrous and impunctate (only with very fine punctures). Metepisterna as long as twice the width of anterior side; metepimera large, broadly rounded. Prosternal intercoxal process widely rounded and bordered at apex. Abdominal ventrites IV-VI shiny but shagreened at sides, glabrous except one pair subapical central setae; males with 2, females with 4 marginal setae at apex of ventrite VII.</p><p>Legs: moderately slender. Posterior face of femora with 1 seta in profemora, 2 in mesofemora and metafemora. Metatrochanters glabrous and slightly shorter than half length of metafemora. Protibial antennal cleaning organ well developed, with 2 clip setae. Protibiae robust, with 4 or 5 outer apical spines; mesotibiae with a group of setae at middle of inner face; metatibiae longitudinally furrowed at inner face. Dorsal face of tarsomeres smooth. Male protarsomeres 1-3 distinctly dilated, slightly asymmetrical; meso- and metatarsomeres not dilated in both sexes; tarsomere 5 ventrally glabrous, dorsally with 2 apical setae; claws smooth.</p><p>Male genitalia: median lobe of aedeagus short and markedly swollen before apex in lateral view (Fig. 23); the apical lamella shortly triangular in dorsal view, with blunt tip (Fig. 30), apex very slightly bent downwards in lateral view. Ostium long, in dorsal position. Right paramere oval; left paramere conchoid.</p><p>Etymology.</p><p>This species is named, as a token of our esteem, after our late colleague Terry Erwin, a world-renowned specialist in world and tropical Carabidae .</p><p>Distribution and ecology.</p><p>Geographical distribution: this species is recorded only from the extreme south banks of the Tonle Sap Lake, Kampong Chhnang Province, Cambodia. It seems to have a more restricted Geographical distribution than D. walterrossii sp. nov., which has been recorded from the same site as well as from other two localities in north-western Cambodia (Fig. 33). Life habits: the specimens of the type series were collected on lake banks by light trapping. No other data are available.</p><p>Remarks.</p><p>It is difficult to assess the closest relatives of D. erwini sp. nov. It belongs to the D. polita group (sensu Ball 1959), as it shares the characters distinguishing this group and, moreover, its aedeagus is very similar to that of D. polita (see pl. V, fig. 72a in Ball 1959). Diplocheila erwini sp. nov., on the other hand, is easily distinguished from D. polita which has a quadrisetose labrum and pronotum more transverse (PW/PL = 1.31 according to Fig. 26 in Plate II in Ball 1959), as well as a larger body size (ABL = 13.4-18.4) (Ball 1959).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DC82C0062D235FA08F17B1D83A9DD9EB	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Allegro, Gianni;Giachino, Pier Mauro	Allegro, Gianni, Giachino, Pier Mauro (2021): The genus Diplocheila Brulle, 1834 in Cambodia, with descriptions of two new species (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Licinini). ZooKeys 1044: 427-448, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.60072, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.60072
382C4F214C4D5D4F801E642E5B814422.text	382C4F214C4D5D4F801E642E5B814422.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Diplocheila (Diplocheila) laevigata (Bates 1892)	<div><p>Diplocheila (Diplocheila) laevigata (Bates, 1892) Figures 2, 6, 8, 12, 14, 18, 20, 26, 27</p><p>Rembus politus MacLeay 1825: 16</p><p>Rembus politus MacLeay, 1825: Redtenbacher 1867: 10</p><p>Rhembus laevigatus Bates 1892: 326</p><p>Eccoptogenius moestus Bates 1889: 267</p><p>Eccoptogenius moestus Bates, 1889: Andrewes 1921: 176</p><p>Diplochila laevigata (Bates, 1892): Andrewes 1921: 177</p><p>Diplochila laevigata (Bates, 1892): Andrewes 1922: 282</p><p>Diplocheila laevigata (Bates, 1892): Andrewes 1930: 149</p><p>Diplocheila laevigata (Bates, 1892): Habu 1956: 55</p><p>Diplocheila laevigata (Bates, 1892): Ball 1959: 35</p><p>Diplocheila laevigata (Bates, 1892): Lorenz 2005a: 342</p><p>Diplocheila laevigata (Bates, 1892): Lorenz 2005b: 571</p><p>Diplocheila laevigata (Bates, 1892): Lafer and Kataev 2008: 682</p><p>Diplocheila laevigata (Bates, 1892): Huber and Marggi 2017: 626</p><p>Type locality.</p><p>Kawkareet in Tenasserim (Myanmar).</p><p>Material examined.</p><p>Myanmar: HT ♂, Kawkareet in Tenasserim, Gen. Febbr. 1887, Fea legit (MCSNG) (figs 2, 6, 12, 26) . Cambodia: 3 ♂♂ 2 ♀♀ Kampong Chhnang, banks of Tonle Sap Lake, 17.V.2019, W. Rossi and V. Kong leg. (CAl, CGi) ; 1 ♂ Kampong Chhnang, Rolea B’ier District, Toekchenh Village, 18.V.2019, W. Rossi and V. Kong leg. (CAl) ; 1 ♂, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=104.65794&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=12.279722" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 104.65794/lat 12.279722)">Khsam</a>, Kampong Chhnang, 12°16'47"N, 104°39'28.6"E, 29.XI-3.XII.2019, light trap, W. Rossi and V. Kong leg. (CAl) .</p><p>Diagnosis.</p><p>Diplocheila laevigata may be distinguished by the combination of the following characters. ABL = 14-16 mm; head with 1 supraorbital setiferous pore on each side; labrum with 6 setae (4 medial + 2 lateral), symmetrical and moderately emarginate (LR = 0.63-0.65) (Figs 12, 14); anterior margin of clypeus hardly concave (Fig. 12); pronotum transverse (PW/PL = 1.29-1.31), with sides delicately sinuate backwards (Fig. 6); elytral striae distinctly punctate; apical lamella of the median lobe of aedeagus in dorsal view shortly triangular, with blunt apex (Figs 20, 26).</p><p>Remarks.</p><p>Diplocheila laevigata is recorded from southern China, Myanmar, Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia (Andrewes 1922; Ball 1959; Lafer and Kataev 2008). Unfortunately, the male HT in the Fea Collection at MCSNG is an immature specimen (Fig. 2) with a scarcely chitinized aedeagus (Fig. 26); however, its examination, made possible thanks to the courtesy of the Honorary Curator Roberto Poggi, revealed that it was conspecific with the specimens from Cambodia (Figs 8, 14, 27). An aedeagus of D. laevigata, substantially corresponding to the HT, is also illustrated by Lafer and Kataev (2008).</p><p>Two specimens from Thailand deposited in CGi (2 ♂♂, Chiang Mai, 6.V.1988, R. Sciaky det.; Figs 9, 15) show a similar aedeagal morphology but pronotum and labrum are differently shaped compared to the HT and to the specimens from Cambodia; they could belong to a new species, but it is not described here, awaiting more abundant material. A further specimen from Thailand deposited at BMNH (1 ♀, Bangkok, Larnaudie leg., H.E. Andrewes Coll.) probably belongs to a different, new species.</p><p>A male specimen from Indonesia deposited at BMNH (1 ♂, Indes Neerl., Boucard leg., H.E. Andrewes Coll.) differs from the D. laevigata HT not only in external morphology, but also in the shape of the aedeagus (although this is damaged, the apical lamella appears to be clearly different); its external morphology does not match D. laevigotoides HT either, in spite of the opinion of Lafer and Kataev (2008) that the records of D. laevigata from Indonesia, together with those from Japan and the Philippines, are probably instead D. laevigotoides . Therefore, this specimen also likely belongs to a new species, awaiting description when more abundant material becomes available.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/382C4F214C4D5D4F801E642E5B814422	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Allegro, Gianni;Giachino, Pier Mauro	Allegro, Gianni, Giachino, Pier Mauro (2021): The genus Diplocheila Brulle, 1834 in Cambodia, with descriptions of two new species (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Licinini). ZooKeys 1044: 427-448, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.60072, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.60072
900ED10AF38053AAAD0A9152CA9D3958.text	900ED10AF38053AAAD0A9152CA9D3958.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Diplocheila (Diplocheila) laevigotoides Jedlicka 1936	<div><p>Diplocheila (Diplocheila) laevigotoides Jedlicka, 1936 Figures 3, 7, 13</p><p>Diplochila laevigotoides Jedlička 1936: 92</p><p>Diplocheila laevigatoides Jedlička, 1936: Ball 1959: 36</p><p>Diplocheila laevigotoides Jedlička, 1936: Lorenz 2005a: 342</p><p>Diplocheila laevigotoides Jedlička, 1936: Lorenz 2005b: 571</p><p>Diplocheila laevigatoides Jedlička, 1936: Lafer and Kataev 2008: 682</p><p>Type locality.</p><p>The Philippines: Manila.</p><p>Material examined.</p><p>Philippine Islands, ♀ HT, Manila, 4.II.1914, Coll. Bottcher (BMNH) (Fig. 3) .</p><p>Diagnosis.</p><p>Diplocheila laevigotoides may be distinguished by the combination of the following characters. ABL = 14 mm; head with 1 supraorbital setiferous pore on each side; labrum with 6 setae (4 medial + 2 lateral), symmetrical and deeply emarginate (LR = 0.80) (Fig. 13); anterior margin of clypeus markedly concave (Fig. 13); pronotum transverse (PW/PL = 1.31), with sides markedly sinuate backwards (Fig. 7); elytral striae nearly impunctate.</p><p>Remarks.</p><p>Diplocheila laevigotoides has often been confused in the past with D. laevigata; for this reason, although the species is probably not present in Cambodia, we decided to examine and illustrate the habitus of the HT specimen (Fig. 3) deposited at BMNH, in order to examine some aspects of its morphology and clarify possible misunderstandings. For this reason, the species is also included in the identification key to the species of Cambodia (see below). Unfortunately, the HT is a female specimen (and the unique PT specimen found by Jiří Hájek in Jedlička Collection at NMPC is also a female). Nevertheless, its habitus and the particular shape of the pronotum and labrum allow for D. laevigata and D. laevigotoides to be reliably distinguished. The opinion of Lafer and Kataev (2008) that the records of D. laevigata from Indonesia could refer to D. laevigotoides is not confirmed by our examination of a male specimen from the same area (see Remarks under D. laevigata). We have nothing at present to add about the records from Japan (Habu 1959) and the Philippines (Ball 1959), which are also suspected to belong to D. laevigotoides .</p><p>It is curious that this species was described by Jedlička (1936) as D. laevigotoides (probably a printing error), although the label of the HT reports " Diplocheila laevigatoides " (Fig. 3).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/900ED10AF38053AAAD0A9152CA9D3958	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Allegro, Gianni;Giachino, Pier Mauro	Allegro, Gianni, Giachino, Pier Mauro (2021): The genus Diplocheila Brulle, 1834 in Cambodia, with descriptions of two new species (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Licinini). ZooKeys 1044: 427-448, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.60072, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.60072
582C63BBE91F5B488E6973704D0409DA.text	582C63BBE91F5B488E6973704D0409DA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Diplocheila (Diplocheila) walterrossii Allegro & Giachino 2021	<div><p>Diplocheila (Diplocheila) walterrossii sp. nov. Figures 4, 10, 16, 19, 22, 29, 33</p><p>Type locality.</p><p>Cambodia, Siem Reap Province, N Siem Reap City, 13°26'29"N, 103°52'25"E.</p><p>Material examined.</p><p>Holotype: ♂, Cambodia, Siem Reap Province, N Siem Reap <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=103.87361&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=13.441389" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 103.87361/lat 13.441389)">City</a>, 13°26'29"N, 103°52'25"E, light trap, 13.XI.2018, W. Rossi and V. Kong leg. (CGi).</p><p>Paratypes: (7 ♂♂ and 3 ♀♀); 2 ♂♂, same data as HT; 2 ♂♂ Cambodia, Kampong Chhnang Province, Khom Domnatpopol, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=104.6875&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=12.237223" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 104.6875/lat 12.237223)">Tonle Sap Lake</a>, 12°14'14"N, 104°41'15"E, light trap, 21.V.2018, Rossi, Bernardi and Kong leg. ; 1 ♂ 1 ♀, Cambodia, Kampong Chhnang, banks of Tonle Sap Lake, light trap, 17.V.2019, W. Rossi and V. Kong leg. ; 1 ♂, Cambodia, Kampong Chhnang, Rolea B’ier District, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=104.66389&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=12.225277" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 104.66389/lat 12.225277)">Toulkrolanh Village</a>, 12°13'31"N, 104°39'50"E, light trap, 7.XI.2018, W. Rossi and V. Kong leg. ; 2 ♀♀, Cambodia, Banteay Meanchey Province, near Sisophon, Campus of the Mean Chey University, light trap, 22.X-23.XI.2019, P. Bun and W. Rossi leg. ; 1 ♂, Cambodia, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=104.65794&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=12.279722" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 104.65794/lat 12.279722)">Khsam</a>, Kampong Chhnang, 12°16'47"N, 104°39'28.6"E, light trap, 29.XI-3.XII.2019, W. Rossi and V. Kong leg. (CAl, CCa, CGi, BMNH, MCSNG).</p><p>Diagnosis.</p><p>A medium-sized (ABL: 15-18 mm) Diplocheila of the Diplocheila polita group in the subgenus Diplocheila Diplocheila (sensu Ball 1959). Among the species of this group having a sexsetose labrum, it is easily distinguished from D. erwini sp. nov. by the larger body size (15-18 mm vs 12-14 mm), from D. laevigata and D. laevigotoides by the more transverse pronotum (PW/PL = 1.38 vs 1.28-1.32), from D. indus by the hind angles of pronotum not protruding (externally protruding in D. indus) and from all these species by the morphology of the aedeagus.</p><p>Description.</p><p>Habitus: ABL: 15-18 mm (HT ♂ 15.6 mm). Body parallel-sided, moderately shiny, black with antennae and palpi piceous-brown (Fig. 4).</p><p>Head: almost quadrangular, robust, glabrous except for the supraorbital setae. Eyes markedly convex; a single supraorbital seta on each side. Dorsum with microsculpture not evident, only with scattered punctures visible at&gt;100 × magnification; frontal impressions short and superficial. Labrum symmetrically and deeply (LR = 0.72) emarginate, with six setigerous punctures on anterior margin (4 medial equidistant + 2 lateral on lobes). Clypeus trapezoid, distinctly concave anteriorly, with 1 seta at each anterolateral corner. Antennae moderately long, densely pubescent from segment 4, with terminal two articles surpassing base of pronotum; segments elongate, the second one short, as long as a half of first. Mandibles elongate, broad, approximately similar to one another (the left with apical cutting edge more concave), with scrobe well-defined and glabrous and apex blunt; terebral tooth triangular and prominent. Labial and maxillary palps fusiform, with apices narrowly truncate.</p><p>Thorax: pronotum smooth, with very faint isodiametric microsculpture evident at&gt;200 × magnification and with scattered punctures, transverse (PW/PL = 1.38), widest just above middle (Fig. 10). Disk moderately convex. Sides moderately rounded in anterior half, delicately sinuate backwards. Hind angles rounded obtuse, with a postero-lateral seta. Posterior margin rectilinear between basal impressions, which are linear and markedly impressed; anterior margin with front angles nearly obsolete. A single lateral seta on each side at anterior third. Lateral bead continuous, separated from the discal area by a narrow groove, only scarcely dilated before hind angles. Medial longitudinal impression fine, nearly reaching anterior and posterior margins; anterior transversal impression absent.</p><p>Elytra: moderately long (EL/EW = 1.65), parallel-sided, slightly convex and flattened on disk, widest at middle, with rounded shoulders and sides delicately sinuate before apex. Surface moderately shiny; microsculpture evident only at high magnification (&gt;100 ×), consisting of fine, slightly transverse meshes. Epipleura without any distinct external plicae ("uncrossed epipleura"). Intervals moderately convex, smooth; striae deeply impressed on the whole length, delicately punctate. Parascutellar stria present; scutellar setigerous pore present at base of stria 1, just before conjunction with stria 2. Basal margin complete. Discal setigerous punctures absent; umbilicate series of setigerous punctures continuous, but punctures more widely spaced at middle. Hind wings fully developed.</p><p>Ventral surface (thorax and abdomen): prosternum and proepisterna glabrous and impunctate (only with very fine punctures). Metepisterna twice as long as their width at anterior side; metepimera narrow, nearly rectangular. Prosternal intercoxal process parallel-sided with blunt apex, delicately bordered. Abdominal ventrites IV-VI shiny but shagreened at sides, glabrous except one pair of subapical central setae; males with 2, females with 4 setae at apex of ventrite VII.</p><p>Legs: moderately slender. Posterior face of femora with 1 seta in profemora, 2 setae in mesofemora and metafemora. Metatrochanters glabrous and as long as one-third of metafemora. Protibial antennal cleaning organ well developed, with 2 clip setae. Protibiae robust, with 6 or 7 outer apical spines; mesotibiae with a group of setae at middle of inner face; metatibiae longitudinally furrowed at inner face. Dorsal face of tarsomeres smooth. Protarsomeres 1-3 of males moderately dilated, slightly asymmetrical; meso- and metatarsomeres not dilated in both sexes; tarsomere 5 ventrally glabrous, dorsally with 2 apical setae; claws smooth.</p><p>Male genitalia: median lobe of aedeagus short and moderately swollen before apex in lateral view (Fig. 22); apical lamella very short and apically rounded in dorsal view (Fig. 29), apex thick and very slightly bent downwards in lateral view. Ostium long, in dorsal position. Right paramere elongate and subtruncate at apex; left paramere conchoid.</p><p>Etymology.</p><p>This species is named after its collector, Walter Rossi, a world-renowned specialist in entomoparasitic fungi, as a token of our esteem and as a sign of gratitude for the gift to the authors of the specimens of the new species.</p><p>Distribution and ecology.</p><p>Geographical distribution: this species is recorded from Central and North-Western Cambodia (Fig. 33). Life habits: the specimens of the type series were collected by light trapping. No other data are available.</p><p>Remarks.</p><p>Diplocheila walterrossii sp. nov. belongs to the D. polita group (sensu Ball 1959), as it shares the characters distinguishing this group and, at first sight, is very similar in external morphology to D. laevigata . Nevertheless, at a deeper examination its aedeagus (Figs 22, 29) reveals evident morphological differences and is easy distinguished from that of D. laevigata (Figs 20, 26, 27), as well as from that of D. erwini sp. nov. (Figs 23, 30), both species sympatric and syntopic with D. walterrossii sp. nov. in Cambodia. Moreover, the new species shows a character almost unique in this group, as far as we know, that is the less enlarged male fore tarsi 1-3. For these reasons, D. walterrossii sp. nov. could represent a rather isolated species in the D. polita group, and its closest relatives remain uncertain.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/582C63BBE91F5B488E6973704D0409DA	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Allegro, Gianni;Giachino, Pier Mauro	Allegro, Gianni, Giachino, Pier Mauro (2021): The genus Diplocheila Brulle, 1834 in Cambodia, with descriptions of two new species (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Licinini). ZooKeys 1044: 427-448, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.60072, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.60072
662CE56DE2A759D8894AC18070578185.text	662CE56DE2A759D8894AC18070578185.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Diplocheila (Neorembus) latifrons subsp. latifrons (Dejean 1831) ssp. latifrons (Dejean 1831	<div><p>Diplocheila (Neorembus) latifrons ssp. latifrons (Dejean, 1831) Figures 25, 32</p><p>Rembus latifrons Dejean 1831: 679</p><p>Rembus opacus Chaudoir 1852: 67</p><p>Rembus opacus Chaudoir, 1852: Bates 1873: 265</p><p>Rhembus opacus (Chaudoir, 1852): Bates 1889: 267</p><p>Rhembus latifrons (Dejean, 1831): Bates 1892: 327</p><p>Diplochila latifrons (Dejean, 1831): Lesne 1904: 72</p><p>Diplochila latifrons (Dejean, 1831): Andrewes 1922: 283</p><p>Diplocheila latifrons (Dejean, 1831): Andrewes 1930: 150</p><p>Submera latifrons (Dejean, 1831): Habu 1956: 61</p><p>Diplocheila latifrons (Dejean, 1831): Ball 1959: 41</p><p>Diplocheila latifrons (Dejean, 1831): Kryzhanovskij et al. 1995: 159</p><p>Diplocheila latifrons (Dejean, 1831): Lorenz 2005a: 343</p><p>Diplocheila latifrons (Dejean, 1831): Lorenz 2005b: 580</p><p>Diplocheila latifrons (Dejean, 1831): Lafer and Kataev 2008: 684</p><p>Diplocheila latifrons (Dejean, 1831): Huber and Marggi 2017: 626</p><p>Type locality.</p><p>Oriental India.</p><p>Material examined.</p><p>Cambodia: 1 ♂ Kampong Chhnang Province, Khom Domnatpopol, Tonle Sap Lake, 21.V.2018, Rossi, Bernardi and Kong leg. (CAl) ; 1 ♀ Lamphun, Mueang Lamphun District, near Umong, 24.II.2017, W. Rossi and V. Kong leg. (CAl) ; 1 ♂ Banteay Meanchey, near Sisophon, campus of the Mean Chey University, 1.XI.2018, W. Rossi and V. Kong leg. (CAl) ; 1 ♂ Banteay Meanchey, near Sisophon, campus of the Mean Chey University, 20.V.2019, W. Rossi and V. Kong leg. (CGi) ; 1 ♀ Mean Chey, 20.V.2019, W. Rossi and V. Kong leg. (CAl) ; 1 ♀ Kampong Chhnang, Rolea B’ier District, Ourung Village, 20-23.V.2018, Rossi, Bernardi and Kong leg. (CGi) .</p><p>Thailand: 1 ♂ 1 ♀ Chiang Mai, 6.V.1988 (CGi) . India: 1 ♀ Uttar Pradesh, Jhansi District, Babina, VIII.1987 (CGi) .</p><p>Remarks.</p><p>Diplocheila latifrons is the only species belonging to subgenus Diplocheila Neorembus . Two subspecies are known: the nominotypical one, which is widely distributed across China, Korea, Japan, India, Myanmar, the Russian Far East, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Thailand and Indonesia, and the ssp. Diplocheila latifrons darlingtoni Ball, 1959, which is only recorded from the Philippines (Andrewes 1922; Ball 1959).</p><p>Head, base of elytra, and aedeagus are also illustrated by Lafer and Kataev (2008).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/662CE56DE2A759D8894AC18070578185	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Allegro, Gianni;Giachino, Pier Mauro	Allegro, Gianni, Giachino, Pier Mauro (2021): The genus Diplocheila Brulle, 1834 in Cambodia, with descriptions of two new species (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Licinini). ZooKeys 1044: 427-448, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.60072, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.60072
3C1B7F5006C75DE790EAECA39CF1CC62.text	3C1B7F5006C75DE790EAECA39CF1CC62.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Diplocheila (Submera) laevis (Lesne 1896)	<div><p>Diplocheila (Submera) laevis (Lesne, 1896) Figures 24, 31</p><p>Rhembus laevis Lesne 1896: 243</p><p>Rhembus laevis Lesne, 1896: Bouchard 1903: 171</p><p>Diplochila laevis (Lesne, 1896): Lesne 1904: 72</p><p>Diplochila laevis (Lesne, 1896): Andrewes 1922: 284</p><p>Diplocheila laevis (Lesne, 1896): Andrewes 1930: 150</p><p>Diplocheila laevis (Lesne, 1896): Ball 1959: 52</p><p>Diplocheila laevis (Lesne, 1896): Lorenz 2005a: 343</p><p>Diplocheila laevis (Lesne, 1896): Lorenz 2005b: 571</p><p>Diplocheila laevis (Lesne, 1896): Lafer and Kataev 2008: 690</p><p>Diplocheila laevis (Lesne, 1896): Huber and Marggi 2017: 626</p><p>Type locality.</p><p>Bangkok (Le P. Larnaudie); Chantaboun à Battambang (Siam Cambodgien); Meuwen Bay (Java).</p><p>Material examined.</p><p>Cambodia: 1 ♂ Kampong Chhnang, banks of Tonle Sap Lake, 17.V.2019, W. Rossi and V. Kong leg. (CAl) ; 1 ♂ Kampong Chhnang Province, Sankat Kampong Chhnang, Phum Toul Ompel, banks of a branch of <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=104.683334&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=12.233334" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 104.683334/lat 12.233334)">Tonle Sap Lake</a>, 12°14'N, 104°41'E, 4.XI.2018, W. Rossi and V. Kong leg. (CGi) .</p><p>Remarks.</p><p>Diplocheila laevis is widely distributed across South-East Asia, China, Indonesia, and the Philippines (Andrewes 1922; Ball 1959; Lafer and Kataev 2008). The aedeagus is also illustrated by Lafer and Kataev (2008). As far as we know, this is the first record of the species from Cambodia.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3C1B7F5006C75DE790EAECA39CF1CC62	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Allegro, Gianni;Giachino, Pier Mauro	Allegro, Gianni, Giachino, Pier Mauro (2021): The genus Diplocheila Brulle, 1834 in Cambodia, with descriptions of two new species (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Licinini). ZooKeys 1044: 427-448, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.60072, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.60072
