taxonID	type	description	language	source
8553DE00FFC73174DAD801A4FA8BD3A0.taxon	materials_examined	Type species: Atlantoscia alceui Ferrara & Taiti, 1981 Diagnosis: See Ferrara & Taiti (1981) and Araujo & Leistikow (1999) ATLANTOSCIA INFLATA SP. NOV. CAMPOS- FILHO &	en	Zimmermann, Bianca L., Campos-Filho, Ivanklin S., Deprá, Maríndia, Araujo, Paula B. (2015): Taxonomy and molecular phylogeny of the Neotropical genus Atlantoscia (Oniscidea, Philosciidae): DNA barcoding and description of two new species. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society (Zool. J. Linn. Soc.) 174 (4): 702-717, DOI: 10.1111/zoj.12256, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/zoj.12256
8553DE00FFCD317DDABB01B6FED9D7C7.taxon	description	All nominal species of the genus Atlantoscia had high support values (bootstrap of 99 % and posterior probability of 1.0), including those described in the present study. According to the Bayesian tree, A. ituberasensis and A. rubromarginata form a more basal clade within the genus. Atlantoscia sulcata and A. inflata form distinct clades, whereas a larger clade is formed by the species A. petronioi, A. meloi, and A. floridana. Sequence divergence (K 2 P) within species of Atlantoscia ranged from 0 to 4.4 %. Atlantoscia inflata showed the highest intraspecific divergence, with a mean of about 2 % (Table 2). Sequence divergence amongst congeneric species ranged from 14.8 % (A. rubromarginata and A. ituberasensis) to 29.3 % (A. meloi and A. ituberasensis) (Table 3). The average congeneric distance was 20.8 %. Amongst the Atlantoscia species, A. ituberasensis and A. rubromarginata had the highest average genetic divergences, 25.9 and 23 %, respectively. The divergence between A. meloi and A. inflata, the two new species described in this study, was 22 %. The results obtained by applying the ABGD algorithm to the COI data set of the seven analysed Atlantoscia species are presented in Figure 6. Distance values showed a gap between the intraspecific and interspecific distances (Fig. 6 A). The data set was partitioned into seven groups based on the assumption of a maximum intraspecific divergence ≤ 1.3 % (Fig. 6 B). These results corroborated those of the phylogenetic analysis and confirmed the taxonomic validity of the currently recognized species of Atlantoscia.	en	Zimmermann, Bianca L., Campos-Filho, Ivanklin S., Deprá, Maríndia, Araujo, Paula B. (2015): Taxonomy and molecular phylogeny of the Neotropical genus Atlantoscia (Oniscidea, Philosciidae): DNA barcoding and description of two new species. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society (Zool. J. Linn. Soc.) 174 (4): 702-717, DOI: 10.1111/zoj.12256, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/zoj.12256
