taxonID	type	description	language	source
843087DAFFD32D30517A53E017A89B64.taxon	description	In 1825 Don decided (correctly) that the true jatamansi was not a Valeriana after all and therefore coined the name Patrinia jatamansi for it. This name is based on Valeriana jatamansi sensu D. Don (1821), non Jones (1790), and includes in its synonymy ‘ V. spica Vahl, Enum. 1 [i. e. 2 (1805)]. p. 13 ’ (a su- perfluous name for Jones’s V. jatamansi, and therefore also not applicable to what is now the Nardostachys). In other words, Patrinia jatamansi D. Don was in effect a new species for what is now the Nardostachys, its type being the Wallich material from Bhutan cited by Don. The genus Nardostachys – later 19 th-century treatments In 1830 De Candolle erected the genus Nardostachys for the true jatamansi and coined the binomial N. jatamansi, which he clearly based on Patrinia jatamansi (and therefore V. jatamansi sensu D. Don, non Jones). He also added a second species, N. grandiflora DC., based on other Wallich material from Ku- maon (now in the state of Uttarakhand, India), but this plant is now considered conspecific with N. jatamansi (see below). It should be noted that in the Prodromus (1830) De Candolle referred to a publication that had, in fact, not yet been issued (De Candolle 1832) in which both species of Nardostachys (and Valeriana wallichii – see below) were illustrated and once again described. Royle (1835: 1: 242 - 4; 2: t. 54), who had a special interest in materia medica, discovered, while stationed at Saharunpur, and independently of Don, that Jones’s plant was not the true jatamansi, and obtained and grew the correct plant from the mountains of Kedarkantha and / or Shalma in the Western Himalaya (Uttarakhand, India). By the time that he came to publish his conclusions, accompanied by a handsome plate, he had become aware of Don’s and De Candolle’s work and followed their treatment (though without saying to which species of Valeriana he considered Jones’s illustration to belong). Clarke (1881) also followed Don and De Candolle, but made N. grandiflora DC. a synonym of N. jatamansi DC. Adopting the convention of his day, Clarke stated that “ The name V. Jatamansi [of Jones] is hence to be suppressed ” and referred Jones’s illustration to Valeriana wallichii DC. In this identification he followed De Candolle, though, in fact, De Candolle had referred the Jones plate to his new species with a query.	en	Mabberley, D. J., Noltie, H. J. (2014): A note on Valeriana jatamansi Jones (Caprifoliaceae s. l.). Blumea 59 (1): 37-41, DOI: 10.3767/000651914X683476, URL: https://doi.org/10.3767/000651914x683476
843087DAFFD02D35523550EE16379928.taxon	description	[Valeriana jatamansi sensu D. Don, in Lamb. (1821) 180, t., non Jones (1790)].	en	Mabberley, D. J., Noltie, H. J. (2014): A note on Valeriana jatamansi Jones (Caprifoliaceae s. l.). Blumea 59 (1): 37-41, DOI: 10.3767/000651914X683476, URL: https://doi.org/10.3767/000651914x683476
843087DAFFD02D35523550EE16379928.taxon	description	Lectotype (here designated). The plate labelled ‘ Valeriana Jatamansi’ in Lambert (1821). Epitype. The material cited by Weberling as ‘ Typus’: ‘ Wallich 431 (1) resp. 431 (A), Tibet, Gossainthan (G photo!; isotypus in K, LE, M, W) ’. Note — In the Numerical List (Wallich 1829) the two collections under 431 are designated ‘ (1) ’ and ‘ (2) ’, but in some of the distributed duplicates these appear to have been re-numbered as ‘ (A) ’ and ‘ (B) ’. Don (in Lambert 1821) originally quoted the source of his material as “ in Bootaniae et Nepaliae Alpibus ... (V. S.) ”, but in his discussion Lambert (in the same work) referred only to a single collection: “ fine Nepalese specimens sent to me by ... Dr. Wallich ” from which the plate (here designated as lectotype) was made. The formal citation is ambiguous, and it seems possible that the citation ‘ Bootaniae’ could merely have been a repetition of one of the traditional localities of Jones, rather than Wallichian specimens therefrom. From the date of collection (before Wallich himself had visited Nepal), this collection must have been made by, or for, the Hon. Edward Gardner (Resident at the Nepalese court, and botanical correspond- ent of Wallich – see Fraser-Jenkins 2006, M. Watson pers. comm.). Any ‘ Wallich’ specimens in the East India Company herbarium would have reached London too late for Don’s 1825 publication, and it appears that the Valeriana work had, in fact, been completed in time for publication in 1821. Later, Don (1825) cited a single locality “ in Bhotaniae alpibus ” and the collector’s name Wallich – that is, with no ‘ v. s’., but, as he referred back to ‘ Lambert’, that paper and its original materials can be used in typification. Lambert’s herbarium was sold and widely dispersed after his death (some dispersal having predated this), though much of the Nepalese material was purchased by Robert Brown and is now at BM – for details see Miller (1970). Although it is conceivable that an original specimen may exist in another herbarium (CGE, G, etc.) this is unlikely. As there is no relevant specimen from Lambert’s herbarium at BM, and the published plate is an excellent one, it seems safest to lectotypify the name on the plate. As Weberling (1978) cited as ‘ Typus’ material that was not available to Don in 1821, this cannot be accepted as a lectotypification, though in the interests of continuity it is here redesignated as ‘ epitype’. Nardostachys grandiflora DC. (1830) 624, Hara (1975) 107 Cited material: ‘ in Emodo ad Kamaon Nepalensium. Wallich ... (v. s. comm. ab hon. coetu merc. andl. Ind. or. [i. e., in herb. E. I. C.] ’. Lectotypified by Weberling (1978), who cited ‘ Typus: Wallich 431 (2) resp. 431 (B), Kumaun [sic] Range, “ Emodus ad Kamaon ” (G photo!; isotypus K, LE) ’. Note — For numbering of ‘ Wallich’ specimens see above un- der N. jatamansi. The entry in the Numerical List (Wallich 1829) gives the collecting details as “ Kamaon alpes. R. B [linkworth] ”.	en	Mabberley, D. J., Noltie, H. J. (2014): A note on Valeriana jatamansi Jones (Caprifoliaceae s. l.). Blumea 59 (1): 37-41, DOI: 10.3767/000651914X683476, URL: https://doi.org/10.3767/000651914x683476
843087DAFFD02D35523550EE16379928.taxon	description	Nardostachys gracilis Kitam. (1954) 134 Type. ‘ Nepal, Tsumje 3900 m (24 July 1953 S. NAKAO Typus) [KYO] ’. The type was not seen by Weberling, but the illustration published by Kitamura the following year (1955) confirms the identification. Distribution — India, Nepal, Bhutan, China (Gansu, Qinghai, Sicuan, Xizang, Yunnan). The jatamansi of international commerce.	en	Mabberley, D. J., Noltie, H. J. (2014): A note on Valeriana jatamansi Jones (Caprifoliaceae s. l.). Blumea 59 (1): 37-41, DOI: 10.3767/000651914X683476, URL: https://doi.org/10.3767/000651914x683476
843087DAFFD72D355235530015EE9457.taxon	description	Epitype (designated here). Nepal, Mid Western Development Region, Karnali Zone, Mugu District, Below Ghurchi Lagna, N 29 ° 28 ’ 17 ” E 82 ° 8 ’ 21 ”, alt. 3230 m, C. A. Pendry et al. JRS A 81, 7 June 2008 (E [E 00397525], KATH, MAK, TI, TUCH). Note — The hazy portrayal of the (shade? /) ground in which it is growing may have been misinterpreted as indicating a rhizome or root, but it is merely hatching with no outline unlike the rest of the plate. V. wallichii DC. (1830) 640, C. B. Clarke (1881) 213 Cited material: ‘ in Nepalia et ad Kamaon ... Wallich ... (v. s. comm. ab hon. aula merc. angl. Indiae or. [no 433 under V. villosa Wall. ms] ’ G, iso BM, E, K-W etc. Distribution — Pakistan, India, Nepal, Bhutan, China (Chong- qing, Gansu, Guizhou, Henan, Hubei, Hunan, Sichuan, Xizang, Yunnan), Thailand, Vietnam. A locally significant incense and drug plant, for example, in Nepal (Baral & Kurmi 2006: 445).	en	Mabberley, D. J., Noltie, H. J. (2014): A note on Valeriana jatamansi Jones (Caprifoliaceae s. l.). Blumea 59 (1): 37-41, DOI: 10.3767/000651914X683476, URL: https://doi.org/10.3767/000651914x683476
