taxonID	type	description	language	source
8D142C6AFFC354332C05F893FE49FE59.taxon	discussion	Remarks. The locality data of the holotype of A. ohbayashii Tôyama does not correspond to the type locality “ Shanping near Liukuei, Kaohsiung Hsien, Taiwan ” stated by Tôyama (1987).	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFC254332C05FC59FCB2FC16.taxon	discussion	Remarks. The original description of A. falsulus Obenberger neither implies nor requires that there were syntypes. Bellamy (1993: 360), by mentioning “ the holotype ”, validly fixed the lectotype (ICZN, Article 74.6).	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFC254332C05FB56FDF4F9DC.taxon	discussion	Remarks. The conspecifity of A. angustulus and A. laeticeps is judged from the generally accepted concept of A. angustulus (e. g. Schaefer 1949, Cobos 1986, Bílý 1989, Curletti 1994 or Niehuis 2004).	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFC554342C05FF6BFE14FDE9.taxon	discussion	Remarks. The name of this species was cited by Descarpentries & Villiers (1963 b) as basilewskyanus on page 6 and as basileswskyanus on page 22. There is an indication (Horn & Kahle 1935, 1937) that this species was named after “ Basilevsky, Georgij Petrovitsh ”. As a first reviser (ICZN, Article 24.2.3) I consider basilewskyanus to be the correct original spelling.	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFC554342C05FD9BFC89FAB9.taxon	materials_examined	Type locality. “ Sofia, Bulgaria ”. Type locality determined by lectotype (ICZN, Article 76.2).	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFC554342C05FD9BFC89FAB9.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Described from “ Bulgaria ”.	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFC554342C05FB23FE2EF971.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Curletti (2001: 27) emended the name of this species from cairnensis to cairnsensis based on the “ holotype ” label name written as “ cairnsensis ” and the type locality “ Cairns ”. However, there is no clear evidence of an inadvertent error in the original publication (ICZN, Article 32.5.1). Therefore the name cairnensis Obenberger, 1959 is the correct original spelling, while the name cairnsensis Curletti, 2001 is an unjustified emendation.	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFC554352C05F97BFB8DF909.taxon	materials_examined	Material examined. CHINA: Fujian: 1 ♀ (EJCB): “ China, Fujian prov. bor. occ., Shaowu env. 25 km road, Shaowu­Taining 6 – 10.7.1991 ”; 1 ♂, 1 ♀ (EJCB): “ China, Fujian prov., Shaowu env., 23 – 27. vi. 1991 ”; Hunan: 1 ♂ (EJCB): “ China Hunan SE 1994, Guidong env. 26 – 31. V., 26.04 N 113.56 E ”; Jiangxi: 1 ♀ (EJCB): “ China Jiangxi W, Jinggang Shan – Ciping, 2 – 14. VI. 1994 ”; Shaanxi: 1 ♀ (EJCB): “ China, Shaanxi pr. Hua Shan, 17 – 21.6.1991 ”; Sichuan: 1 ♀ (EJCB): “ China­Sichuan, Pingwu, 32 ° 15 ' N, 104 ° 16 ' E, 3 – 9.6.1997 ”; 1 ♀ (EJCB): “ China: Sichuan, Guanxian 600 m, 12 – 14. VII. 1990 ”; Yunnan: 40 exs (EJCB): “ China, Yunnan 22. V. – 2. VI. 1993 100 km W of Kunming, Diaolin Nat. Reservation ”; 14 exs (EJCB): “ Yunnan 2000 m, 25.03 N 101.55 E, Yipinglang 8 – 10 / 6., 1993 ”; 2 ♂♂ (EJCB): “ Yunnan 1500 – 1600 m, 23.04 N 104.25 E, Maguan 25 – 26.6.1994 ”; 2 ♀♀ (EJCB): “ China, Yunnan prov., Lufeng, Yipinglang, 23. VII. 1994 ”; 1 ♀ (EJCB): “ China, Yunnan W, Tengchong env., 10 – 13. VI. 1993 ”; JAPAN: Fukuoka: 1 ♂ (EJCB): “ Mt. Homan­San, Dazaifu city, Fukuoka pref., 9. VI. 1993, S. Ohmomo leg. ”.	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFC554352C05F97BFB8DF909.taxon	distribution	Distribution. China (Fujian, Hunan, Jiangxi, Shaanxi, Sichuan, Yunnan, Zhejiang provinces); Japan (Kyushu island). Agrilus cinctus (Olivier)	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFC554352C05F97BFB8DF909.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Muskovits (2002), Muskovits & Hegyessy (2002) and Muskovits et al. (2003) recorded A. cinctus from Hungary. Vít Kubá ň (pers. com) examined specimens in the Muskovits collection determined as “ cinctus ”. Some of these represent A. croaticus Abeille de Perrin, 1897 and others represent A. cuprescens (Ménétriés, 1832). Records of A. cinctus from Bulgaria (Sakalian 2003); Austria, Bosnia, Croatia, Macedonia, Slovenia, Switzerland and Yugoslavia (Bílý 2002); and the southwestern part of the former Soviet Union (Alexeev 1959) are also likely based on misidentifications.	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFC554352C05F97BFB8DF909.taxon	materials_examined	Type locality: “ Brive­la­Gaillarde ” region Limousin, France.	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFC554352C05F97BFB8DF909.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Belgium (Hastir & Gaspar 2002), France, Germany (e. g. Niehuis 2004), Portugal (Ladeiro 1949), Spain (e. g. Verdugo Paéz 2003).	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFC754362C05FD53FCD6FAB9.taxon	discussion	Remarks. The original description of A. tripartitus japanensis Obenberger neither implies nor requires that there were syntypes. Kurosawa (1989: 191 – 192), by mentioning “ the type ”, validly fixed the lectotype (ICZN, Article 74.6). The original type locality “ Japan ” is presumably mistaken (Kurosawa 1989).	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFC754372C05FB23FEF1FD61.taxon	discussion	Remarks. A single syntype is deposited in NMHN but was not available for study. The conspecifity of A. croaticus and A. serbicus is based on the generally accepted concept of A. croaticus.	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFC754372C05FB23FEF1FD61.taxon	materials_examined	Type locality. “ Bisamberg bei Wien ”, Austria. Determined by the lectotype (ICZN, Article 76.2).	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFC754372C05FB23FEF1FD61.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Agrilus curtii was described from multiple localities “ Uj­Pest; Bisamberg bei Wien; Wien Umgebung ”. The type locality becomes the place of origin of the lectotype. The name curtii was cited by Bílý (1993) as a synonym of A. croaticus. Mühle et al. (2000) studied types of both taxa and reconfirmed their conspecifity. Bílý (2002) treated A. curtii as a valid species without further explanation.	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFC654382C05F86EFC54FC29.taxon	description	= amabilicolor Obenberger, 1936 syn. nov.	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFC654382C05F86EFC54FC29.taxon	discussion	Remarks. The original description of A. ornativentris Saunders neither implies nor requires that there were syntypes. Descarpentries & Villiers (1963 a: 52), by mentioning “ the type ” (“ type: Laos (British museum) ”), validly fixed the lectotype (ICZN, Article 74.6).	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFC654382C05F86EFC54FC29.taxon	discussion	Remarks. A junior primary homonym of A. amabilis Gory & Laporte, 1837.	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFC654382C05F86EFC54FC29.taxon	discussion	Remarks. A replacement name for amabilis Kerremans.	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFC954392C05F87BFBDFFDE9.taxon	discussion	Remarks. The original description of A. dignus Kerremans neither implies nor requires that there were syntypes. Obenberger (1960: 134), by mentioning “ the type ” (“ Le type examiné est originaire de Matang ”), validly fixed the lectotype (ICZN, Article 74.6).	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFC854392C05FA4BFB86F9A9.taxon	description	Mus. Nat. Pragae Inv. [p] 24904 [h] [orange label] ”. A single paralectotype is deposited in IZAS (Yang Xingke et al. 1991: 31). The exact number of syntypes is unknown.	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFC854392C05FA4BFB86F9A9.taxon	materials_examined	Material examined. INDIA: Assam: 2 exs (EJCB): “ NE India, Assam, 1999, 5 km N of Umrongso 700 m, 25 ° 27 ' N, 92 ° 43 ' E, 17 – 25. v., Zd. Koš ť ál lgt. ”; 20 exs (EJCB): “ NE India, Assam, 1999, 5 km N of Umrongso 700 m, 25 ° 27 ' N, 92 ° 43 ' E, 17 – 25. v., J. Rol č ík, leg. ”; 1 ♂ (EJCB): “ NE India, Assam prov. Umrongso env. 700 m, 25 ° 27 ' N, 92 ° 43 ' E, 3 – 8. vi., Tryzna & Benda leg. 2002 ”; 50 exs (EJCB): “ NE India, Assam, 1999, 5 km N of Umrongso 700 m, 25 ° 27 ' N, 92 ° 43 ' E, 17 – 25. v., Dembický & Pacholátko leg. ”.	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFC854392C05FA4BFB86F9A9.taxon	distribution	Distribution. China (Yunnan province), India (Assam state).	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFCB543A2C05FC43FC79FBA1.taxon	discussion	Remarks. The original description of A. erythrostictus neither implies nor requires that there were syntypes. Descarpentries & Villiers (1963 a: 55, 58), by mentioning “ the type ” (“ holotype au Muséum Paris ”), validly fixed the lectotype (ICZN, Article 74.6).	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFCB543A2C05FA4BFD37F971.taxon	description	= tscherepanovi Stepanov, 1954 syn. nov.	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFCA543B2C05FDEBFB23FB01.taxon	discussion	Remarks. The aedeagus of the lectotype is missing. Alexeev (1964) elevated the subspecies to species rank and presented distinguishing characters and distribution.	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFCD543C2C05FF6BFD02FE59.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Agrilus lineatus Kerremans is a junior secondary homonym of A. lineatus (Schrank von Paula, 1782) originaly proposed in Buprestis and now considered as a synonym of A. viridis (Linné, 1758).	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFCD543C2C05FD53FE22FA19.taxon	description	= woodlarkianus Kerremans, 1900 syn. nov.	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFCD543C2C05FB9EFE06F8CC.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Kurosawa (1975: 1) considered A. beppuensis conspecific with A. subrobustus Saunders, 1873. This concept was followed also by Akiyama & Ohmomo (1997: 40).	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFCC543D2C05FF6BFC52FDD1.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Agrilus araxicola Abeille de Perrin was described from Armenia: “ Caucase, vallée de l'Araxe ”. Due to its conspecifity with A. moerens from East Asia, I consider this locality mistaken (incorrect statement of type locality).	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFCC543E2C05F86BFC16FD61.taxon	discussion	Remarks. The original description of A. bidentellus Obenberger neither implies nor requires that there were syntypes. Bellamy (1993: 359), by mentioning “ the holotype ”, validly fixed the lectotype (ICZN, Article 74.6).	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFCC543E2C05F86BFC16FD61.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Obenberger (1936 d: 1095) cited the name praeoccupatus Hoscheck, 1931 as an unavailable synonym of A. ocularis Deyrolle, 1864. Hoscheck did not propose this replacement name for A. ocularis Deyrolle, 1864 but for “ Agrilus ocularis Kerremans (1912) ”, originally assigned to the genus Aphanisticus and considered by Obenberger (1936 d) as a synonym of Endelus tristis Kerremans, 1900. Thus the name praeoccupatus Hoscheck is an objective available synonym of Endelus ocularis Kerremans, 1912 and a subjective synonym of Endelus tristis Kerremans, 1900.	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFCF543E2C05FC8BFBB9FAE1.taxon	materials_examined	Type locality. “ Calabria, Antonimina ”. Type locality determined by lectotype (ICZN, Article 76.2.).	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFCF543E2C05FC8BFBB9FAE1.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Agrilus paganettii was described from multiple localities: “ Calabria Antonimina; Mte. Conevo; Prov. di Aneona ”. The type locality becomes the place of origin of the lectotype.	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFCF543E2C05FC8BFBB9FAE1.taxon	discussion	Remarks. A single paratype deposited in NMPC was examined.	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFCF543E2C05FB0BFE00F971.taxon	description	= subperniciosus Obenberger, 1936 d unavailable name	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFCF543E2C05FB0BFE00F971.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Obenberger (1936 d: 1103) cited the name “ perniciosus Obenberger, 1924 ” as a synonym of a new replacement name subperniciosus. Obenberger (1924 a) did not propose the name perniciosus as new, he attributed it to Deyrolle (1864). The name subperniciosus Obenberger is an unavailable and superfluous replacement name (ICZN, Article 13.1.3).	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFCF543F2C05F976FCB2FDD1.taxon	discussion	Remarks. The original description of A. singaporensis Obenberger neither implies nor requires that there were syntypes. Bellamy (1993: 362), by mentioning “ the holotype ”, validly fixed the lectotype (ICZN, Article 74.6).	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFCE54202C05F81BFD36FEF9.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Only two paralectotypes are conspecific with the lectotype, five of them belong to two different species.	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFD154212C05FFE3FB84FE09.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Agrilus mongoliae was considered conspecific with A. quadrisignatus by Obenberger (1934: 14). Reexamination of the lectotype confirms this opinion.	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFD154212C05FFE3FB84FE09.taxon	materials_examined	Material examined. CHINA: Hebei: 3 ♂♂, 1 ♀ (EJCB): “ China, Hebei / Nei Mongol, pass Chengde­Chifeng, 41.6 N, 118.2 E, 14 – 16. VI., 2001 ”; Shanxi: 1 ex (EJCB): “ China, Shanxi, 9. June. 2000, Lüliang Shan, 1000 m, road Fangshan­Jiaocheng, Hengjian env. ”; 1 ♀ (EJCB): “ China, centr. Shanxi, Chao Shan 37.1 N, 112.4 E, 25 km SE Pingyao., 4 – 5. VI., 2001 ”; 12 exs (EJCB): “ China, W Shanxi, 9. VI. 2000, 37.7 N, 111.6 E, Lüliang Shan, road Fangshan­Jiaocheng, HENGJIAN env., ~ 1000 m ”; RUSSIA: Buryatiya: 1 ex (ZIN): “ Transbaicalia mr. occ. fl. Tshikoj: Sharagol 1. VII. 1928 Th. Lukjanovitsh ”; Primorsk: 3 exs (EJCB): “ Russia, Primorski kray, Khankajski distr. 1995, lake Khanka, 17 – 19. vii., Kamen' ­ Rybolov ”; 1 ♂ (EJCB): “ Russia, Primorsk reg., 30.7. – 8.8.1992, Kajmanovka, E. Ku č era leg. ex Ulmus ”; 2 exs (EJCB): “ SSSR, Primorskij k., Kajmanovka 10 – 22. vii. 1993, Z. Klete č ka leg. ”; 1 ex (EJCB): “ USSR­Sibiria or., Ussuri region, 450 m, YASNOE 11 – 14.7.1989, R. Dunda lgt. ”; 6 exs (EJCB): “ Russia, Primorski kray, Ussurijski district, Baranovski volcano env. 4. ix. 1995 ”; 8 exs (EJCB): “ Sib. or. ­ m., Primorje, Sichote­Alin Mts., Sokol č i, 1 – 15.7. 1990, Kadlec + Vo ř í š ek lg. ”; 2 ♂♂, 1 ♀ (EJCB): “ Sib. or. Primorje, Komarovka flum., Kamenushka env. 300 m, Vo ř í š ek, J. leg. VI. 1992 ”.	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFD154212C05FFE3FB84FE09.taxon	distribution	Distribution. China (Gansu, Hebei, Inner Mongolia, Jiangsu, Shanxi provinces), Mongolia, North Korea, Russia (Buryatia, Chita, Primorsk regions). Data on distribution compiled from Obenberger (1934), Alexeev (1989) and Hua Li Zhong (2002).	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFD154212C05FFE3FB84FE09.taxon	discussion	Remarks. I have not seen specimens of A. quadrisignatus Marseul from Japan. Agrilus quadrisignatus kinoshitae Obenberger, 1936 c is conspecific with A. sospes Lewis (see synonymy under A. sospes). Agrilus roscidiformis Obenberger	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFD054212C05FF93FB08FCB1.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Agrilus sachalinensis is very closely related to A. zhelochovtsevi Alexeev, 1979, from which it differs by more greenish tinge, relatively longer pronotum and slightly different aedeagus. More material is needed to confirm their distinctiveness.	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFD054212C05FBD3FC7CF921.taxon	discussion	Remarks. The name of this species was cited by Descarpentries & Villiers (1963 b) as schaumaae on page 5 and as shaumaae on page 18. As a first reviser (ICZN, Article 24.2.3), I consider shaumaae to be the correct original spelling.	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFD054222C05F8CBFB7DFB69.taxon	description	= quadristictulus Obenberger, 1940 syn. nov.	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFD054222C05F8CBFB7DFB69.taxon	materials_examined	Material examined. CHINA: Shaanxi: 1 ♀ (EJCB): “ C­CHINA, Shaanxi, Qinling Shan, 6 km E of Xunyangba, 1000 ­ 1300 m, 23. V. – 13. VI., leg. C. Holzschuh 2000 ”; 1 ex (EJCB): “ China­Shaanxi, Lüeang 33 ° 07 ' N 106 ° 05 ' E, 8.6. – 14.6.1996, lgt. E. Ku č era ”; Shanxi: 1 ♂ (EJCB): “ China, centr. Shanxi, Chao Shan 37.1 N, 112.4 E, 25 km SE Pingyao., 4 – 5. VI., Jaroslav Turna leg. 2001 ”; JAPAN: Fukushima: 7 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀ (EJCB): “ Japan, Fukushima Pref., Fukushima city, Moniwa, Iizaka town, 2.6.1995, leg. Sugiura ”; Iwate: 2 ♀♀ (EJCB): “ Japan, Iwate, Gosho dam, Morioka­shi, 16. VI. 1993 ”; Shizuoka: 4 ♂♂ (EJCB): “ Japan, Shizuoka pref., Sumata, 2. VI. 1984, A. Torikata leg. ”; Tokyo: 1 ex (EJCB): “ Kominawa, Takao machi, Tokyo Met., 18.5.79, leg. Kusakabe ”; 8 exs (EJCB): “ Mitsukyô, Yokohama city, 5. V. 1971, Akiyama leg. ”; Yamanashi: 1 ex (EJCB): “ Hikawarindô, Daibosatsu Mts., Yamanashi pref., 8 / 9. V. 79, leg. Nakamura ”; KOREA NORTH: 1 ♀ (MNHN): “ Corée, Kosan, Chass. indigènes ”.	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFD054222C05F8CBFB7DFB69.taxon	distribution	Distribution. China (Liaoning (Li Jng ke 1992), Shaanxi, Shanxi provinces), Japan (Hokkaido, Honshu Shikoku, Kyushu, Tsushima islands), North Korea, South Korea.	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFD354222C05FB73FB50F991.taxon	materials_examined	Type locality. “ Pedong ”. Determined by the lectotype (ICZN, Article 76.2.). Remaks. Described from two localities: “ Pedong (A. Desgodins); Sikkim: Kurseong (R. P. Breteaudeau) ”. The type locality becomes the place of origin of the lectotype.	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFD354232C05F81BFBD7FE59.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Obenberger (1927 a: 16) clearly stated that this species is “ Dedicated to Amico caro, Dom. Prof. Pavel Nikolajevi č Spesivcev ”. Despite the fact that the name of this Russian entomologist is correctly spelled and transliterated as “ Spessivtseff ” (Horn & Kahle 1936, 1937), this is not sufficient reason to consider spesivcevi as an inadvertent error (ICZN, Article 32.5.1). Spellings of this name as “ spessivcevi ” (Obenberger 1936 d, Alexeev & Volkovitsh 1989, Hua Li Zhong 2002) should be considered as incorrect subsequent spellings. See also remarks under A. ulaangomiensis Cobos, 1972.	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFD254232C05FD3BFDD2FB01.taxon	distribution	Distribution. China (Anhui, Fujian, Guizhou, Hubei, Hunan, Shaanxi, Sichuan, Yunnan provinces), Japan (Honshu, Kyžshž, Ryukyu, Shikoku, Tsushima islands), North Korea, South Korea, Taiwan.	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFD554242C05FF6BFB59FD81.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Agrilus tricolor Deyrolle is distinctive by its sexual dichromatism. The female is all black­violet, while the head and pronotum of the male are golden­red.	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFD554242C05FC2BFBF4FC29.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Marseul (1866) named his newly proposed species (Number 25) as friwaldskyi in the key on page 438 and as turcicus in the descriptive part on page 467. Since the name friwaldskyi is accompanied by a definition of the taxon that it denotes, it is an available name (ICZN, Article 12.1) and an objective synonym of turcicus.	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFD554242C05FDCEFB19F9A4.taxon	description	= emeljanovi Alexeev, 1975: 152 – 155. (syn. by Alexeev & Volkovitsh 1989)	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFD554242C05FDCEFB19F9A4.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Alexeev & Volkovitsh (1989: 319) considered A. ulaangomiensis to be a junior synonym of A. spesivcevi Obenberger. Reexamination of both types reveals that A. ulaangomiensis is a distinct species by slender body form, wider frons, smaller eyes, transverse pronotum, more arcuate prehumerus and entire elytral pubescence.	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFD554252C05F859FD12F881.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Described from “ Ussuri (Vladivostok) ”. The type locality becomes the place of origin of the lectotype (ICZN, Article 76.2.).	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFD554252C05F859FD12F881.taxon	materials_examined	Type locality. “ Troickoye, oz. Khanka, Primorsk ” RussiA. Type locality determined by the lectotype (ICZN, Article 76.2.).	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFD554252C05F859FD12F881.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Originally described from “ Ussuri, Primorje ”. The type locality becomes the place of origin of the lectotype. The name lasiolus was proposed by Obenberger (1935 a) for a variety of Agrilus ussuricola. Kurosawa (1963, 1974) and Akiyama & Ohmomo (1997) considered A. lasiolus to be a distinct species. Examination of the lectotypes of A. ussuricola and A. ussuricola var. lasiolus revealed their conspecifity.	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFD554252C05F859FD12F881.taxon	materials_examined	Material examined. CHINA: Shaanxi: 1 ♂, 1 ♀ (EJCB): “ China, 1150 – 1300 m, Shaanxi Qinling mts., Foping (6 km N), 20 – 21. vi. 1998, I. H. Marshal leg. ”; 1 ♂ (EJCB): “ China­Shaanxi, Lüeang, 18.5 – 21.5.2000, leg. E. Ku č era ”; 1 ♀ (EJCB): “ China, Shaanxi, Foping env. 7. Jun., 120 km SW Xian, 1992, M. Bok lgt. ”; JAPAN: Nagasaki: 1 ♀ (EJCB): “ (Mt. Ohboshi) Tsushima Is., 17. vi. 1997, coll. T. Akashi ”; NORTH KOREA: 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀ (EJCB): “ N. Korea, 19.7.1990, Toxong env. Omdouri ”; 1 ♂ (EJCB): “ D. P. R. Korea, Manmulsang, Kumgangsang Mts., lgt. M. Slovák, 25.5.1988 ”; RUSSIA: Amursk: 1 ♂ (EJCB): “ USSR, Archara, Amursk. oblast, 7.89 Morozinski ”; Primorsk: 2 ♂♂, 1 ♀ (EJCB): “ Rossia, 2 – 10. VIII., Primorskij kraj, 1992, Ussurijsk, Kajmanovka, lgt. Smr ž ”; 15 exs (EJCB): “ Sib. or. ­ m., Primorje Sichote – Alin Mts. Sokol č i 1 – 15.7.1990 Kadlec + Vo ř íšek lg. ”; 1 ♂ (EJCB): “ Rossia, Primorskij k., Rjazanovka 4 – 8. vii. 1993, Z. Klete č ka leg. ”; 1 ♂ (EJCB): “ Russia, Primorski kray, Khankajski distr. 1995, lake Khanka, 17 – 19. vii., Kamen' ­ Rybolov ”; 1 ♀ (EJCB): “ Sib. or. Primorje, Komarovka flum., Kamenushka env., 300 m, Vo ř íšek, J. leg. VI. 1992 ”; 25 (EJCB): “ USSR, Primorskij kraj Arseneev env. 300 – 400 m 11 – 19. VII. 1990 B. Šiška & R. Č ermák leg. ”;> 500 exs (EJCB): “ Russia or, Primorskiy Kray, 44 ° 10 ' N, 133 ° 15 ' E, Arsen'yev env., June 1991, O. Šauša & M. Štrba leg. ”.	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFD554252C05F859FD12F881.taxon	distribution	Distribution. China (Shaanxi province), Japan (Tsushima island), North Korea, Russia (Amursk, Primorsk, Khabarovsk regions). Hou Taoqian (1981, 1987) and Hua Li Zhong (2002) reported this species from Xizang, Yunnan and Heilongjiang in China. These records need confirmation due to possible confusion with other Chinese species with an asymmetric aedeagus.	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFD754262C05FDB3FCBBFB01.taxon	discussion	Remarks. The name of this taxon was originally given by Marseul (1868) as “ viridi caerulans ” and not “ viridi coerulans ”, thus the correct original spelling is viridicaerulans, not viridicoerulans as stated by Niehuis (2004).	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFD754272C05FAABFDB4FDD1.taxon	materials_examined	Type locality. “ Saint­Chamas [Provence Alpes Côte d’Azur, France] ”.	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFD754272C05FAABFDB4FDD1.taxon	discussion	Remarks. The name rubi was proposed by Schaefer for a species from the roscidus species­group living on Rubus which had been previously confused with A. prasinus. No type locality was given, and the mention of Basse­Provence (“ Je désigne ainsi la forme la plus courante, au moins en Basse­Provence ”) cannot be considered as a type locality statement. The type locality becomes the place of origin of the lectotype (ICZN, Article 76.2).	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
8D142C6AFFD754272C05FAABFDB4FDD1.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Kaszab (1940) cited the name rubi with an inscription: “ [L. Schaefer in litt.] ”, making it evident that he was referring to the species of Schaefer as indicated also by his use of the same specific name (rubi). Kaszab (1940) was probably not aware of Schaefer’s (1937) description of the species. As a result, I consider A. rubi Kaszab to be conspecific with A. viridicaerulans rubi Schaefer. The conspecifity of both taxa is also supported by the remark of Kaszab: “ steht A. roscidus so nahe ” and by the fact that no other Agrilus from the roscidus species­group in Europe lives on Rubus.	en	Jendek, Eduard (2005): Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus Agrilus Curtis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae: Agrilini). Zootaxa 1073 (1): 1-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1073.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.1073.1.1
