identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
981F8794FF8FB235EAC5FC70AE6CA9EE.text	981F8794FF8FB235EAC5FC70AE6CA9EE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Udamopyga Hall 1938	<div><p>Udamopyga Hall, 1938</p><p>Udamopyga Hall, 1938: 255 . Type species: Udamopyga smagra Hall, 1938, by original designation.</p><p>Merokellymyia Blanchard, 1939: 843 . Type species: Merokellymyia nodositas Blanchard, 1939 [= Udamoctis setigena Enderlein, 1928], by original designation.</p><p>References. Lopes (1940; Merokellymyia as synonym of Udamopyga, key, biological notes, revision and descriptions of new species); Lopes (1941; diagnosis of female); Travassos (1941; report of field work); Lopes (1943; descriptions of larvae of two species); Lopes (1955; catalog); Dodge (1965; key, revision and descriptions of new species); Dodge (1967; description of a new species); Lopes (1968; comments on the type of one species); Lopes (1969a; catalog); Lopes (1969b; biological notes and descriptions of new species); Rohdendorf (1970; checklist); Lopes (1973; biological notes); Lopes (1975a; diagnosis of subtribe Udamopygina); Lopes (1975b; descriptions of new species); Lopes (1978; revision of one species); Linhares (1981; synanthropy); Lopes (1982; diagnosis of subtribe Udamopygina); Shewell (1987; key to genera of Nearctic Sarcophagidae); Lopes (1988; key, revision and description of new species); Pape (1996; catalog); Sabrosky (1999; family group names of Diptera); Arnett (2000; checklist); Pape et al. (2004; checklist); Mello-Patiu et al. (2009; checklist); Mulieri et al. (2010; key and biological notes); Pape &amp; Dahlem (2010; key to genera of Central American Sarcophagidae); Mulieri et al. (2011; biological notes); Patitucci et al. (2011a; geographic notes); Patitucci et al. (2011b; type deposition); Vairo et al. (2011; key to Brazilian species of forensic importance); Beuter et al. (2012; species of forensic importance); Mello-Patiu et al. (2014; key to genera and list of species from Argentina); Alves et al. (2014; species of forensic importance); Dufek et al. (2015; checklist); Mulieri et al. (2015a; comparative morphology); Mulieri et al. (2015b; sex-biased patterns of saprophagous Calyptratae); Patitucci et al. (2015; inventory of saprophagous Calyptratae in Buenos Aires); Dufek et al. (2016; ecology); Mello-Patiu (2016; catalog); Buenaventura &amp; Pape (2018; sarcophagine phylogeny).</p><p>Generic diagnosis. Antennal arista with upper ray in a double row; two anteriormost frontal setae divergent; scutellum with pairs of basal, lateral and subapical setae (the lateral one being the shortest) and a pair of preapical discal setae; proepisternum bare; postalar wall setulose; wing with vein R 1 bare or setose dorsally, and third costal sector setose ventrally. Male: no proclinate orbital setae; outer vertical seta undifferentiated from postocular setae; scutellum with a pair of marginal apical setae; mid femur without a ctenidium; ST5 with a window (Fig. 7); cerci fused almost along their entire length in posterior view (Fig. 9); postgonite with a long seta, longer than maximum width of postgonite (Fig. 10); basiphallus and distiphallus distinctly separated (Fig. 10); juxta well differentiated and formed of two lobes, generally joined proximally and with proximal margins slightly recessed within paraphallus (Figs 1, 3–4, 6); vesica consisting of a single proximal portion attached to the hypophallus and a paired distal portion forming two lateral, lobe-shaped arms (Figs 1–6). Ventrally, the inner margin of each arm has a detached projection of species-specific shape and ornamentation, herein named “inner ventral margin” (im; Figs 2– 3, 5, 11, 22, 26, 31, 36, 40, 45). Female: scutellum without marginal apical setae; T6 undivided and broad posteriorly (Figs 12–13, 52–57); ST6–8 fused (Figs 12–13); ST7 with a discal concavity (Figs 12–13, 54, 56–57); spermathecae oval and striate (Fig. 13).</p><p>Remarks. The morphological and taxonomic revision of the seven species analyzed herein has led to more a detailed diagnosis of the genus and a reinterpretation of some structures of the male terminalia. Each of the studied species has four (two long, two short) postsutural dorsocentral setae except for Udamopyga diversa, which has three (the first short). Moreover, Dodge (1965) observed in some species of Udamopyga that the upper rays of the arista are in a double row, which is corroborated herein. We highlight that species of Udamopyga are not easily distinguishable by color patterns, which show a lot of individual variation (e.g., specimens of the same species can have either bright golden pruinosity or bright silver pruinosity on the head). In the redescriptions, the most frequent color pattern is presented. For a more detailed overview of color variations in Udamopyga species see Lopes (1988).</p><p>Roback (1954) defined the vesica as “an antero-dorsal flap-like appendage of the corpus”. The corpus is referred to by Giroux et al. (2010) as the phallic tube, and defined as “the tube-shaped part of the distiphallus surrounding the sperm duct and supporting processes such as the harpes and the vesica”. As a result, Giroux et al. (2010) described the vesica as a lobe-like structure protruding outwards from the anterior surface of the phallic tube. Whitmore et al. (2013) recovered the terms hypophallus and paraphallus, using them for the ventral and dorsal parts of the phallic tube, respectively. In the hypophallus, they considered two structures: the membrane (the most proximal section of the hypophallus) and the vesica (an appendage of the hypophallus distal to the membrane). While seeking to determine the homology of a structure called “lateral plates of paraphallus” by Lopes (1982) or “a pair of rounded lateral lobes in the phallus” by Pape (1996) with respect to these definitions, our observations led us to identify them as being the vesica (Figs 1–6), which agrees with the interpretation of Buenaventura &amp; Pape (2018). In Udamopyga, the vesica has a paired distal portion forming two lateral lobe-shaped arms, and ventrally the inner margin of each lobe has a projection of species-specific shape and ornamentation, referred to as “inner ventral margin of vesica” in the species descriptions (im; Figs 2–3, 5, 11, 22, 26, 31, 36, 40, 45). Buenaventura &amp; Pape (2018) also observed this configuration of the ventral margin of the vesica in U. percita, U. neivai and U. provecta, and termed it as “vesical denticulated lobe”. A vesica with this particular configuration has not yet been observed in any other genus of Sarcophaginae and we agree with Buenaventura &amp; Pape (2018) that this character is autapomorphic to Udamopyga . In addition, our study of the female terminalia allowed us to confirm the observations by Lopes (1940), who pointed out a discal concavity on ST7 (“sternite VIII” in Lopes [1988]), another possible autapomorphy supporting the monophyly of Udamopyga (Figs 12–13, 54, 56–57).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/981F8794FF8FB235EAC5FC70AE6CA9EE	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Santos, Josenilson Rodrigues Dos;Mello-Patiu, Cátia Antunes De	Santos, Josenilson Rodrigues Dos, Mello-Patiu, Cátia Antunes De (2018): Review of the Brazilian species of Udamopyga Hall, 1938 (Diptera: Sarcophagidae), with the description of a new species and a key to males and females. Zootaxa 4508 (1): 1-27, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4508.1.1
981F8794FF89B239EAC5FC68AE6EA930.text	981F8794FF89B239EAC5FC68AE6EA930.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Udamopyga squamata Santos & Mello-Patiu 2018	<div><p>Udamopyga squamata Santos &amp; Mello-Patiu sp. nov.</p><p>(Figs 7–17)</p><p>Type-material. HOLOTYPE ♂: “ Brasil, RJ [Rio de Janeiro], São Francisco do Itabapoana / E. E. E. [ Estação Ecológica Estadual] Guaxindiba / Trilha Renata / Bruno / (atrás charco) - Malaise / junho–julho.2013 Eq.[Equipe] Col.[de Coleta] [printed on white paper] / Biota Diptera Fluminense [vertical]” // “ Holotype [printed on red paper, black frame]” // “ Udamopyga squamata / Santos &amp; Mello-Patiu 2017 / HOLOTYPE / Det. J.R.Santos &amp; C.A.Mello-Patiu [handwritten on white paper]” (MNRJ) [holotype in good condition, with right fore and left hind legs missing; terminalia dissected].</p><p>PARATYPES. 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀: BRAZIL, Santa Catarina, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-52.383335&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-27.183332" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -52.383335/lat -27.183332)">Nova Teutônia</a> [Seara], 27°11’S 52°23’W, vi.1950, 300– 500 m, Fritz Plaumann leg. (MNRJ) [♀♀ in good condition, one with abdomen dissected; ♂ with abdomen dissected, vesica with right inner ventral margin broken, right wing and legs glued on card] .</p><p>Diagnosis. Male: cercal base with long and similar-sized setae (Figs 8–9); vesica with two distal rounded lobes, each with inner ventral margin as a ladle-shaped projection (Figs 10–11); juxta formed of two, welldemarcated rounded lobes with squamous ornamentation (Figs 10–11). Female: T6 undivided, with a longitudinal crease along midline giving it roof-like appearance (Figs 12–13, 15); T8 divided into two narrow halves (Fig. 13); epiproct absent (Figs 12–13); ST5 as long as wide (Fig. 12); ST6–8 fused, ST7 3x as long as ST6, with a concave area in posterior half; ST8 rounded and shorter than ST6 and ST7 (Figs 12–13).</p><p>Description. Male (n = 2). Length: 7–10 mm.</p><p>Head. Parafacial, fronto-orbital plate and postocular orbits dark brown with slightly yellowish-silver pruinosity (Figs 14, 16–17); facial ridge with setae on lower half; parafacial with row of setulae close to eye, the lowermost 1– 2 similar in size to subvibrissal setae; frons about 0.25x head width at level of ocellar triangle; frontal vitta entirely blackish; 9–10 well-developed frontal setae reaching level of apex of pedicel; rows of frontal setae parallel except anteriormost 2 divergent; reclinate orbital seta present, proclinate orbital setae absent; ocellar setae as developed as upper frontals; outer vertical seta undifferentiated from postocular setae; gena and genal groove with yellowishsilver pruinosity (Figs 14, 16); gena with black setae; postgena silvery-gray pruinose with black setae anteriorly and whitish setae close to occiput (Figs 14, 16); antenna black (Figs 14, 16); first flagellomere approximately 3x longer than pedicel; arista long plumose on basal 3/4, with upper rays in a double row; palpus blackish (Figs 14, 16).</p><p>Thorax. Dark brown with silvery-gray pruinosity, slightly golden on postpronotum (Figs 14, 16–17); chaetotaxy: acrostichals 2–3 (well developed) + 1, dorsocentrals 3 (the anteriormost shorter) + 4 (well developed), intra-alars 1+2, supra-alars 2+3, postpronotals 3, notopleurals 4; postalar wall setulose; postalar callus with 2 setae; scutellum with a pair of basal, lateral and subapical setae (the lateral one shorter), a pair of apical setae, and a pair of preapical discal setae; katepisternum with 3 setae almost in a straight line; meral setae 9–10; proepisternum bare; prosternum setulose. Wing. Hyaline, with dark brown veins; tegula dark brown; basicosta yellowish (Fig. 14); vein R 4+5 with setulae dorsally on 2/3 of distance to crossvein r-m; vein R 1 bare; cell r 4+5 open at wing margin; costal spine not differentiated; third costal sector setulose ventrally. Legs. Blackish-brown, pulvilli yellowish-brown; mid femur with 3 median anterior setae, a row of anteroventral setae, 2 preapical posterior setae, a row of posteroventral setae, and without a ctenidium; mid tibia with 1 median anterior seta, 1 basal posterior seta and 2 posterior setae in apical third; hind trochanter with a ventromedian pad of short, spiniform setae.</p><p>Abdomen. Dark brown with silvery-gray pruinosity (Figs 14, 16–17); T4 with 1 pair of longer median marginal setae and 1 pair of lateral marginal setae; T5 with a row of 14 marginal setae; ST2–4 with marginal setae more developed than discal setae; ST3–4 with one pair of longer posterior marginal setae; ST5 deeply cleft up to midlength, base with a long median window, arm with a pad-shaped protrusion along inner margin and with long setae at apex (Fig. 7). Terminalia. Syntergosternite 7+8 and epandrium yellowish-brown; phallus, gonites and cercal apex dark brown; cercus with numerous long setae on base and short and sparse setae in apical half; cercal prongs parallel and very close together, separated only in apical third in posterior view, and with apex enlarged and truncated in lateral view (Figs 8–9); surstylus axe-like, with long apical setae (Fig. 8); pregonite longer than postgonite, with broad base and slightly curved apex (Fig. 10); postgonite with sub-triangular base, pointed and curved apex, and with a long seta inserted near anterobasal corner (Fig. 10); hypandrium smaller than phallapodeme (Fig. 10); postgonal apodeme short and rectangular (Fig. 10); phallus with basiphallus distinct from distiphallus, both of similar length (Fig. 10); vesica with rounded lobes and inner ventral margin with a ladleshaped projection at apex (Figs 10–11; paratype with right inner ventral margin of vesica broken); juxta well demarcated, with two rounded lobes with squamous ornamentation (Figs 10–11); median stylus with enlarged and sub-quadrangular base and apex narrow, straight and spinose (Fig. 11); lateral stylus tube-like, short and robust, with apical spines (Fig. 11).</p><p>Female (n = 2). Length: 8–12 mm. Differs from male as follows: frons about 0.28x head width at level of ocellar triangle, with 7–8 well-developed frontal setae; 2 proclinate orbital setae similar to or slightly longer than reclinate orbital setae; outer vertical seta about 2/3 to 1/2 length of inner vertical seta; scutellum without apical setae; hind trochanter without modified ventromedian setae; ST2–3 with 2 pairs and ST4 with 1 pair of long marginal setae, respectively (Fig. 12); ST5 almost as long as wide, with 4 setae along posterior margin (Fig. 12); terminalia reddish-brown; T6 undivided and broad posteriorly, with a longitudinal crease along midline, giving it roof-like appearance; posterior margin with a row of longer marginal setae (Figs 12–13, 15); spiracles 6 in intersegmental membrane and spiracles 7 in tergal plate (Figs 12–13); T8 divided into two narrow and bare halves (Fig. 13); ST6–8 fused; ST6+ST7 almost rounded (Figs 12–13); ST6 short with numerous marginal setae (a median pair longer and stronger) (Figs 12–13); ST7 about 3x as long as ST6, with numerous setae along posterior margin and a characteristic discal concavity in posterior half (Figs 12–13); ST8 short, with basal section membranous and apex rounded, setose and sclerotized (Figs 12–13); epiproct absent; hypoproct broad, with setae longer and more numerous on sides (Figs 12–13); cercus broad and rounded (Figs 12–13); vaginal plate membranous; spermathecae oval and striated (Fig. 13).</p><p>Distribution. Brazil (Rio de Janeiro, Santa Catarina).</p><p>Etymology. The species epithet is derived from the Latin squamata (adjective, feminine), meaning scaly, in allusion to the squamous ornamentation of the juxta.</p><p>Remarks. Udamopyga squamata sp. nov. is morphologically similar to Udamopyga diversa . Males of both species have ST5 arm with a pad-shaped protrusion along the inner margin (Figs 7, 18), cerci not fused at apex (Figs 9, 20), surstylus axe-like (Figs 8, 19), and postgonite curved, with sharp-pointed apex (Figs 10, 21). These two species can be differentiated by the following features: 3+4 dorsocentral setae, vesica with inner ventral margin as a ladle-like projection without ornamentation (Figs 10–11), juxta with squamous ornamentation (Figs 10–11), and T6 of female with a longitudinal crease along midline (Fig. 15) in U. squamata sp. nov., versus 3+3 dorsocentral setae, vesica with ventral spines and inner ventral margin as a spinose projection (Fig. 21–22), juxta without ornamentation (Figs 21–22), and T6 of female slightly curved along midline in U. diversa (Fig. 52).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/981F8794FF89B239EAC5FC68AE6EA930	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Santos, Josenilson Rodrigues Dos;Mello-Patiu, Cátia Antunes De	Santos, Josenilson Rodrigues Dos, Mello-Patiu, Cátia Antunes De (2018): Review of the Brazilian species of Udamopyga Hall, 1938 (Diptera: Sarcophagidae), with the description of a new species and a key to males and females. Zootaxa 4508 (1): 1-27, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4508.1.1
981F8794FF85B23BEAC5FC4DA9C9AE37.text	981F8794FF85B23BEAC5FC4DA9C9AE37.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Udamopyga diversa Lopes 1940	<div><p>Udamopyga diversa Lopes, 1940</p><p>(Figs 18–22, 46, 52)</p><p>Udamopyga diversa Lopes, 1940: 948 . Type locality: Brazil, Rio de Janeiro. References. Dodge (1965; key); Lopes (1969a; catalog); Lopes (1973; biological notes); Lopes (1988; key); Pape (1996; catalog); Mello-Patiu et al. (2009; checklist).</p><p>Type-material examined. HOLOTYPE ♂: “ Rio de Janeiro / H. S. Lopes [printed on white paper, black frame]” // [EX] “Ins. Osw. Cruz [Instituto Oswaldo Cruz] / Cult. [culture] N° 28 [printed on white paper]” // [EX] “Ins. Osw. Cruz [Instituto Oswaldo Cruz] / N° 10358 [number in microscope slide collection] [printed on white paper]” // “ Holotype [printed on red paper, black frame]” // “ Udamopyga / diversa / Lopes / Lopes Det. [printed on white paper, black frame]” // “ MNRJ / 2293 [printed vertically on white paper]” (MNRJ) [holotype in good condition; terminalia not dissected; puparium pinned with specimen; obtained in culture from a female from Meier, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 18.ii.1932].</p><p>PARATYPES. 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀ (one allotype): same data as holotype (MNRJ); 1 ♂: BRAZIL, RJ, Rio de Janeiro, Jardim Botânico, vi.1934, culture 152, H. S. Lopes leg. (MNRJ) [paratypes in good condition; ♂ from culture 28 is double-mounted with left wing, left anterior and mid legs missing; the abdomen was previously on microscope slide N° 10367, but Canada balsam was removed and the terminalia are now preserved in glycerin in a plastic microvial; allotype ♀ double-mounted, with left wing and left leg detached and glued to label; terminalia not dissected; other ♀ with mid leg detached and glued on label, with abdomen on microscope slide N° 13613; tergites missing] .</p><p>Additional material examined. Brazil: 1 ♂, Espírito Santo, Linhares, vi.1972, P.C. Elias leg. (MNRJ) ; 1 ♀, Espírito Santo, Guarapari, 23.i.1973, culture 1099, H.S. Lopes leg. (MNRJ) ; 1 ♂, 1 ♀, Espírito Santo, Guarapari, 9.ii.1973 H.S. Lopes leg. (MNRJ) ; 1 ♂, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Grajaú, i.1957, H.S. Lopes leg. (MNRJ) .</p><p>Diagnosis. Male cercus with a tuft of long and hair-like setae in cercal base (Figs 19–20, 46); vesica with conspicuous lateroventral spinose ornamentation and inner ventral margin as two spinose projections (Figs 21–22); juxta formed of two well-individualized sub-rectangular lobes (Figs 21–22). Female T6 convex along midline, without a longitudinal crease (Fig. 52); ST5 wider than long; ST7 about 2x as long as ST6, with a concave area near middle, ST8 membranous and indistinct; epiproct membranous, with two pairs of setae.</p><p>Redescription. Differs from U. squamata sp. nov. as follows:</p><p>Male (n = 8). Length: 9–14 mm; frons about 0.28x head width at level of ocellar triangle; dorsocentral setae 3+3; T5 with a row of 12 marginal setae; ST5 with a short median window and arm with a conspicuously broad and rounded apex (Fig. 18); cercal base with a tuft of long, hair-like setae; cercal prong narrow in distal third (posterior view), with apex beveled and slightly curved anteriorly in lateral view (Figs 19–20, 46); surstylus with numerous setae along anterior margin (Fig. 19); pregonite approximately the same length as postgonite, with spatulate apex and a slight concavity along dorsal margin (Fig. 21); postgonite with a poorly-developed median dilatation on anterior margin, where the long seta is inserted (Fig. 21); hypandrium and phallapodeme sub-equal in size (Fig. 21); vesica with a conspicuous lateroventral spinose ornamentation and inner ventral margin as two spinose projections (Figs 21–22); juxta formed of two sub-rectangular lobes (lateral view) and joined ventrally just at base (Figs 21–22); lateral and median styli with distinct apical spines; base of median stylus broader (Fig. 22).</p><p>Female (n = 5). Length: 10–14 mm; frons about 0.36x head width at level of ocellar triangle; ST4 with two pairs of long setae; ST5 wider than long; T6 convex along midline, without a longitudinal crease (Fig. 52); ST7 about 2x length of ST6, with concave area near middle; ST8 membranous and indistinct; epiproct with one pair of setae (Lopes 1940: figs 33–34).</p><p>Distribution. Brazil (Espírito Santo *, Rio de Janeiro).</p><p>Remarks. Udamopyga diversa is morphologically similar to Udamopyga squamata sp. nov. (see remarks under that species). However, males of U. diversa have cercal base with a conspicuous tuft of hair-like setae and vesica formed of two rounded lobes with some spinose ornamentation, similarly to U. malacophila and U. neivai (Figs 19–26, 28–30, 46–48). Udamopyga diversa can be differentiated from these species by the following features: dorsocentral setae 3+3, apex of male cercal prongs clearly separated and slightly divergent in posterior view (Fig. 20), female T6 convex along midline, and female epiproct with one pair of setae (Fig. 52). Udamopyga malacophila has 3+4 dorsocentral setae, apex of male cercal prongs separated but parallel and close to each other (Figs 23, 47), juxta with a concave depression along apical margin (ventral view) (Fig. 26), female with T6 with a longitudinal crease along midline (Fig. 53) and epiproct without setae. Udamopyga neivai has 3+4 dorsocentral setae, apices of male cercal prongs fused along their entire length (Figs 28, 48), juxta with a slightly convex dilatation in the apical margin (ventral view) (Fig. 31), female with T6 with a strong longitudinal crease along midline (Fig. 54) and epiproct with two pairs of setae.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/981F8794FF85B23BEAC5FC4DA9C9AE37	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Santos, Josenilson Rodrigues Dos;Mello-Patiu, Cátia Antunes De	Santos, Josenilson Rodrigues Dos, Mello-Patiu, Cátia Antunes De (2018): Review of the Brazilian species of Udamopyga Hall, 1938 (Diptera: Sarcophagidae), with the description of a new species and a key to males and females. Zootaxa 4508 (1): 1-27, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4508.1.1
981F8794FF87B23DEAC5FB4AAA2EA98C.text	981F8794FF87B23DEAC5FB4AAA2EA98C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Udamopyga malacophila Lopes 1940	<div><p>Udamopyga malacophila Lopes, 1940</p><p>(Figs 23–26, 47, 53)</p><p>Udamopyga malacophila Lopes, 1940: 944 . Type locality: Brazil, Rio de Janeiro.</p><p>Udamopyga malacophaga: Lopes (1969a: 103.44, 1988: 106; incorrect spelling).</p><p>References. Dodge (1965; key); Lopes (1969a; catalog); Lopes (1973; biological notes); Lopes (1988; key); Pape (1996; catalog); Mello-Patiu et al. (2009; checklist).</p><p>Type-material examined. HOLOTYPE ♂: “225 [culture] [handwritten on white paper]” // [EX] “Col. Ins. O. Cruz [Collection Instituto Oswaldo Cruz] / N. 10045 [number of microscope slide] [printed on white paper]” // “ Holotype [printed on red paper, black frame]” // “ Udamopyga / malacophila / Lopes / Lopes Det. [printed on white paper, black frame]” // “MNRJ / 2295 [printed vertically on white paper]” (MNRJ) [holotype with abdomen dissected, terminalia on miscroscope slide; culture 225 was obtained from larvae bred from the gastropod Thaumastus taunaysi (de Férussac) (Bulimulidae) in Brazil, RJ, Rio de Janeiro, Grajaú, 16.x.1937, by H. S. Lopes].</p><p>PARATYPES: 1 ♀ (allotype): same data as holotype except microscope slide N o 10046 (MNRJ); 1 ♂: Brazil, RJ, Rio de Janeiro, Grajaú, culture 227, 22.ix.1937, H.S. Lopes leg. (MNRJ) ; 1 ♀: same data as previous except culture 230 and terminalia on microscope slide N o 13614; 1 ♀: same data as ♂ paratype except culture 260, 22.vi.1939, and terminalia mounted on microscope slide N o 13614 (MNRJ) [paratypes in good condition; ♂ with terminalia glued to culture label; one ♀ with abdomen somewhat crushed].</p><p>Additional material examined. Brazil: 2 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀: Espírito Santo, Linhares, vi.1972, P.C. Elias leg. (MNRJ) ; 1 ♂, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Grajaú, xi.1937, H.S. Lopes leg. (MNRJ) .</p><p>Diagnosis. Male cercus with conspicuous long setae on cercal base (Figs 23–24, 47); vesica formed of two rounded lobes with strong spinose ventral ornamentation and inner ventral margin with long spinose projections (Figs 25–26); juxta formed of two long lobes, each with a concave depression on distal margin (Figs 25–26). Female T6 with longitudinal crease along midline and roof-like appearance (Fig. 53); ST5 longer than wide; ST6– 8 fused, ST7 about 2x as long as ST6, with a concave area near apex; ST8 membranous and indistinct; epiproct membranous, without setae.</p><p>Redescription. Differs from U. squamata sp. nov. as follows:</p><p>Male (n = 5). Length: 10– 5 mm; parafacial, fronto-orbital plate, posterior ocular orbits and gena with golden pruinosity; frons about 0.23x head width at level of ocellar triangle; frontal vitta entirely dark brown; antenna with first flagellomere approximately 4x as long as pedicel; T4 with 3–4 lateral marginal setae; T5 with a row of 16 marginal setae and numerous long setae on the ventral face; ST5 arms with rounded apex [ST5 not dissected, so other features not visible]; cercus with numerous short apical setae besides long basal setae; cercal base slightly inclined posteriorly in lateral view and cercal prongs separated but parallel and close to each other in posterior view (Figs 23–24, 47); surstylus boomerang-like with numerous anterior setae (Fig. 23, 47); pregonite with a broad base, with apical half almost straight and apex slightly rounded, and with some setulae along posterior margin (Figs 25, 47); postgonite with base broader than slightly curved apex, with a long seta in basal half accompanied by several setulae (Figs 25, 47); vesica with proximal spinose ornamentation in ventral region and along inner ventral margin, and with two long, sclerotized, spinose projections (Figs 25–26); juxta formed of two elongated and well individualized lobes, each with concave depression on distal margin (ventral view) (Fig. 26); lateral stylus narrow and elongated, with a row of lateral spines along apical half; median stylus with rounded base and numerous apical spines (Fig. 26).</p><p>Female (n = 5). Length: 9–13 mm; 5–7 well-developed frontal setae; T5 with 12 marginal setae; ST2 with one pair of long setae; ST4 with two pairs of long setae; ST5 longer than wide; terminalia yellowish-brown; T6 undivided, dorsally narrow, with a longitudinal crease along midline (Fig. 53); ST5 longer than wide; ST6–8 fused; ST7 about 2x as long as ST6, with a concave area near apex; ST8 membranous and little distinct; epiproct membranous without setae (Lopes 1940: figs 25–26).</p><p>Distribution. Brazil (Espírito Santo *, Góias, Rio de Janeiro, Santa Catarina).</p><p>Remarks. Udamopyga malacophila is morphologically similar to U. diversa and U. neivai . See remarks under U. diversa .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/981F8794FF87B23DEAC5FB4AAA2EA98C	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Santos, Josenilson Rodrigues Dos;Mello-Patiu, Cátia Antunes De	Santos, Josenilson Rodrigues Dos, Mello-Patiu, Cátia Antunes De (2018): Review of the Brazilian species of Udamopyga Hall, 1938 (Diptera: Sarcophagidae), with the description of a new species and a key to males and females. Zootaxa 4508 (1): 1-27, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4508.1.1
981F8794FF81B23FEAC5FB94A9CCAE37.text	981F8794FF81B23FEAC5FB94A9CCAE37.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Udamopyga neivai Lopes 1940	<div><p>Udamopyga neivai Lopes, 1940</p><p>(Figs 27–31, 48, 54)</p><p>Udamopyga neivai Lopes, 1940: 942 –944. Type locality: Brazil, Rio de Janeiro.</p><p>References. Lopes (1941; diagnosis of female); Lopes (1943; descriptions of larval instars 1 and 3); Dodge (1965; key); Lopes (1969a; catalog); Lopes (1973; biological notes); Lopes (1975a; comments on morphological differences in populations from Rio de Janeiro and Ceará); Lopes (1988; key); Pape (1996; catalog); Mello-Patiu et al. (2009; checklist); Buenaventura &amp; Pape (2018; sarcophagine phylogeny).</p><p>Type-material examined. HOLOTYPE ♂: “ Rio de Janeiro / Grajahu [ Grajaú] S. Lopes [printed on white paper, black frame]” // [EX] “ Col. Ins. O. Cruz [Collection Instituto Oswaldo Cruz] / N. 10043 [permanent microscope slide] [printed on white paper, black frame]” // “cultura [culture] / N. 269 [printed on white paper, black frame]” // “ Holotype [printed on red paper, black frame]” // “ Udamopyga / neivai / Lopes / Lopes Det. [printed on white paper, black frame]” // “ MNRJ / 2296 [printed vertically on white paper]” (MNRJ) [holotype with abdomen dissected and terminalia mounted on a microscope slide].</p><p>PARATYPES: 1 ♂: same data as holotype (MNRJ) . 1 ♂, 1 ♀: same data as holotype except culture 260, both obtained in 22.vii.1939 from larvae bred from the gastropod Thaumastus taunaysi and female terminalia mounted on microscope slide N.13612 (MNRJ) ; 1 ♀: same data as holotype except culture 222, obtained in xi.1937 (MNRJ); 1 ♀: same data as holotype except culture 226 (MNRJ); 1 ♀: same data as holotype except culture 227 (MNRJ); 2 ♀♀: same data as holotype except culture 230 (MNRJ) [paratypes in good conditions; one ♂ and three ♀♀ with terminalia dissected].</p><p>Additional material examined. Brazil: 1 ♂, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Grajaú, 21.xi.1940, Lopes &amp; Oliveira leg. (MNRJ) ; 1 ♂, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Grajaú, 28.iv.1946, H.S. Lopes leg. (MNRJ) ; 2 ♀♀, 1 ♂, Ceará, Pacatuba, 350 m, 22.viii.1973, H.S. Lopes leg. (MNRJ) ; 1 ♀, Ceará, Pacatuba, culture 1119, 23.viii.1973 H.S. Lopes leg. (MNRJ) .</p><p>Diagnosis. Male cercus with a conspicuous tuft of long and hair-like setae on cercal base (Figs 28–29, 48); vesica formed of two rounded lobes (lateral view) and with inner ventral margin as spinose projections (Figs 30– 31, 48); juxta formed of two long lobes, each with a slightly convex dilatation on distal margin (ventral view) (Figs 30–31, 48). Female T6 with longitudinal crease along midline (Fig. 54); ST5 longer than wide; ST6–8 fused; ST7 about 2x as long as ST6, with a discal concavity near apex (Fig. 54); ST8 membranous and indistinct, epiproct membranous, with two pairs of setae.</p><p>Redescription. Differs from U. squamata sp. nov. as follows:</p><p>Male (n = 6). Length: 10–15 mm; parafacial, fronto-orbital plate and posterior ocular orbits with golden pruinosity; frons about 0.24x head width at level of ocellar triangle; frontal vitta entirely dark brownentire; 7–10 well-developed frontal setae reaching level of apex of pedicel; gena and genal groove dark brown with golden pruinosity; postgena black with golden pruinosity and whitish setae; antenna dark brown; 9–12 meral setae; T4 with two or three pairs of lateral marginal setae; T5 with 12 marginal setae; ST5 with sharp-pointed arms and window as long as wide (Fig. 27); cerci fused along their whole length (posterior view); cercal prong distally narrowed with apex slightly rounded in lateral view and straight in posterior view (Figs 28–29, 48); surstylus robust with narrowed base and enlarged apex with setae anteriorly, covered with microtrichia in proximal half (Figs 28, 48); pregonite sub-equal in size to postgonite, with narrow and curved apex (Figs 30, 48); postgonite with long seta near apex (Fig. 30); hypandrium of approximately the same length as phallapodeme; distiphallus longer and wider than basiphallus (Fig. 30); inner ventral margin of vesica with two long, sclerotized, spinose projections (Figs 30–31); juxta formed of two long and well-individualized lobes, narrow in lateral view and broad in ventral view, each with a slightly convex dilatation on distal margin (ventral view) (Figs 30–31, 48); median stylus short and almost straight, with margin serrated in apical half (Fig. 31); lateral stylus arched, slightly longer than median stylus and with a distinct row of spines (Fig. 31).</p><p>Female (n = 9). Length: 11–14 mm; frons about 0.23x head width at level of ocellar triangle; ST2 with three pairs of long setae; ST3–5 each with one pair of long setae; ST5 longer than wide; ST7 about 2x as long as ST6, with a discal concavity near apex (Fig. 54); ST8 membranous and not very distinct; epiproct membranous, with two pairs of setae (Lopes 1940: figs 29–30).</p><p>Distribution. Brazil (Ceará, Rio de Janeiro).</p><p>Remarks. Udamopyga neivai is morphologically similar to U. diversa and U. malacophila; see remarks under U. diversa . Lopes (1975a) pointed out differences between populations from the Brazilian states of Ceará and Rio de Janeiro (type-locality), especially related to some color variation; however, our comparative study did not show significant differences in the terminalia of both sexes.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/981F8794FF81B23FEAC5FB94A9CCAE37	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Santos, Josenilson Rodrigues Dos;Mello-Patiu, Cátia Antunes De	Santos, Josenilson Rodrigues Dos, Mello-Patiu, Cátia Antunes De (2018): Review of the Brazilian species of Udamopyga Hall, 1938 (Diptera: Sarcophagidae), with the description of a new species and a key to males and females. Zootaxa 4508 (1): 1-27, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4508.1.1
981F8794FF83B221EAC5FB40AE33AD06.text	981F8794FF83B221EAC5FB40AE33AD06.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Udamopyga percita (Lopes 1938)	<div><p>Udamopyga percita (Lopes, 1938)</p><p>(Figs 1–3, 32–36, 49, 55)</p><p>Sarcophaga percita Lopes, 1938: 344 –345. Type locality: Brazil, Rio de Janeiro.</p><p>Udamopyga percita: Lopes (1940: 941–942) .</p><p>References. Lopes (1940; placement in Udamopyga and revision); Dodge (1965; key); Lopes (1969a; catalog); Lopes (1969b; biological notes); Lopes (1973; biological notes); Lopes (1982; diagnosis of 1st larval instar); Lopes (1988; key); Pape (1996; catalog); Mello-Patiu et al. (2009; checklist); Mulieri et al. (2010; key and biological notes); Mulieri et al. (2011; biological notes); Patitucci et al. (2011a; geographic notes); Vairo et al. (2011; key to Brazilian species of forensic importance); Beuter et al. (2012; species of forensic importance); Mello-Patiu et al. (2014; key to genera and list of species from Argentina); Mulieri et al. (2015a; comparative morphology); Mulieri et al. (2015b; sex-biased patterns of saprophagous Calyptratae); Patitucci et al. (2015; inventory of saprophagous Calyptratae in Buenos Aires); Buenaventura &amp; Pape (2018; sarcophagine phylogeny).</p><p>Type-material examined. HOLOTYPE ♂: “ Rio de Janeiro / H. Souza Lopes [printed on white paper, black frame]” // [EX] “ Ins. O. Cruz [Instituto Oswaldo Cruz] / N. 10120 [permanent microscope slide; printed on white paper, black frame]” // [EX] “ Ins. O. Cruz [Instituto Oswaldo Cruz] / cult. [culture] N. 2 [printed on white paper, black frame]” // “ Holotype [printed on red paper, black frame]” // “ Sarcophaga / percita n. sp. / Holotypus / 2.38 [ii.1938] Det. H.S. Lopes [handwritten on white paper, black frame]” // “ MNRJ / 2297 [printed vertically on white paper]” (MNRJ) [holotype in good condition; terminalia previously on microscope slide, but since removed from Canada balsam and now in glycerin in a plastic microvial; puparium pinned with specimen].</p><p>PARATYPES, 3 ♂♂, 1 ♀: same data as holotype (MNRJ) [paratypes in good condition with terminalia on microscope slides labeled N. 10121 (♂), N. 10123 (♂), N. 10124 (♂), and N. 10119 (♀)] .</p><p>Additional material examined. Brazil: 1 ♂, Bahia, Feira de Santana, 28–29.xii.2010, T. Monteiro leg. (MNRJ) ; 1 ♂, Espírito Santo, Guarapari, 22.i.1973, H.S. Lopes leg. (MNRJ) ; 1 ♀, Espírito Santo, Guarapari, culture 1103, 11.ii.1973, H.S. Lopes leg. (MNRJ) ; 2 ♀♀, Espírito Santo, Guarapari, culture 1124, i.1974, H.S. Lopes leg. (MNRJ) ; 1 ♂, Espírito Santo, Guarapari, 21.i.1974, H.S. Lopes leg. (MNRJ) ; 1 ♂, Espírito Santo, Guarapari, 13.i.1975, H.S. Lopes leg. (MNRJ) ; 4 ♂♂, Espírito Santo, Linhares, xi.1972, P.C. Elias leg. (MNRJ) ; 1 ♂, Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, i.1953, Amancio da Silva leg. (MNRJ) ; 1 ♂, Mato Grosso do Sul, Reserva Biológica Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul, 23.x.2013, R. Toma leg. (MNRJ) ; 5 ♂♂, Rio de Janeiro, Arraial do Cabo, v.1963, P. Jurberg &amp; H. Rezende leg. (MNRJ) ; 1 ♂, Rio de Janeiro, Cabo Frio, i.1962, J. Jurberg leg. (MNRJ) ; 1 ♂, Rio de Janeiro, Cabo Frio, iv.1962, J. Jurberg leg. (MNRJ) ; 1 ♂, Rio de Janeiro, Grajaú, v.1950, H.S. Lopes leg. (MNRJ) ; 1 ♂, Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 1954, P. Cabral leg. (MNRJ) ; 1 ♂, Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Maria, 2.xii.1978, H.S. Lopes leg. (MNRJ) .</p><p>Diagnosis. Male cercus with a tuft of long setae on cercal base (Figs 33–34, 49); vesica formed of two dark and sclerotized lobes with a convex, membranous and well-delimited central area, and with inner ventral margin as two double projections each consisting of two long, microtrichiose filaments (Figs 1–3, 35–36, 49); juxta formed of two well-individualized lobes with latero-posterior flaps (Figs 1–3, 35–36, 49). Female T6 convex along midline, without a longitudinal crease (Fig. 55); ST5 wider than long; ST7 about 3x as long as ST6 and with concave area near middle; ST8 poorly sclerotized; epiproct membranous, without setae.</p><p>Redescription. Differs from U. squamata sp. nov. as follows:</p><p>Male (n = 23). Length: 10–13 mm; slightly golden pruinosity can be present on ocellar triangle; frons about 0.28x head width at level of ocellar triangle; 7–9 well-developed frontal setae reaching apex of pedicel; gena and genal groove with golden pruinosity; ST5 with apically-rounded arms and a short window; base of arms with a swollen area with numerous spiniform setae, apex of arms with long setae (Figs 32, 49); cerci fused along their whole length; cercal prong with truncate apex (posterior view) and with a small, anterior apical projection (lateral view) (Figs 33–34); surstylus boomerang-like with setae along anterior margin (Figs 33, 49); pregonite similar in length to postgonite, with base 3x as broad as median region (Fig. 35); postgonite almost straight with sharp apex and a long seta near apex (Fig. 35); hypandrium slightly longer than phallapodeme (Fig. 35); postgonal apodeme clavate (Fig. 35); vesica with blackish and sclerotized lobes with a central, convex, membranous and welldelimited area; inner ventral margin of vesica as two long, double projections, i.e., each composed of two filaments, both covered with microtrichia (Figs 1–3, 35–36, 49); juxta formed of two lobes with rounded lateroposterior flaps (Figs 1, 3, 35–36, 49); median stylus with spinose ornamentation in apical half (Fig. 36); lateral stylus slightly longer than median stylus, with a lateral row of spines (Fig. 36).</p><p>Female (n = 4). Length: 9–12 mm; frons about 0.31x head width at level of ocellar triangle; 5–7 welldeveloped frontal setae; T5 with about 16–18 marginal setae; ST4 with two pairs of long setae; ST5 wider than long; terminalia yellowish-brown; T6 convex along midline, without a longitudinal crease (Fig. 55); ST7 about 3x as long as ST6, with a concave area near middle; ST8 membranous and not very distinct; vaginal plate weakly sclerotized (Lopes 1940: figs 31–32).</p><p>Distribution. Argentina (Buenos Aires, Catamarca, Santiago del Estero, Tucumán); Brazil (Bahia *, Espírito Santo, Mato Grosso do Sul *, Minas Gerais, Paraná, Rio de Janeiro, Rio Grande do Sul *, São Paulo).</p><p>Remarks. Udamopyga percita is morphologically similar to U. provecta and U. setigena . In males of these three species the cercus has a sharp-pointed, anteriorly curved apex (Figs 33, 37, 42, 49–51) and the vesica is formed of conspicuously rounded lobes (Figs 1–6, 35–36, 39–40, 44–45, 49–51); in females T6 is convex along the midline and without a longitudinal crease (Figs 55–57). Males of Udamopyga percita and U. provecta also share juxtal lobes with lateral projections (Figs 1, 35, 39, 49–50) and vesica with a central membranous area (Figs 1–3, 35, 39, 49–50), while in U. setigena the juxtal lobes lack lateral projections (Figs 4, 44) and the vesica has striated ornamentation and no membranous central area (Figs 4, 44, 51). Udamopyga percita can be differentiated from U. provecta by the well-delimited membranous central area of the vesica and the rounded latero-posterior flaps of the juxtal lobes (Figs 1, 3, 35, 49), whereas in U. provecta the vesica has a cracked-looking integument, without a welldelimited central area, and the juxtal lobes have latero-anterior membranous projections (Figs 39, 50).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/981F8794FF83B221EAC5FB40AE33AD06	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Santos, Josenilson Rodrigues Dos;Mello-Patiu, Cátia Antunes De	Santos, Josenilson Rodrigues Dos, Mello-Patiu, Cátia Antunes De (2018): Review of the Brazilian species of Udamopyga Hall, 1938 (Diptera: Sarcophagidae), with the description of a new species and a key to males and females. Zootaxa 4508 (1): 1-27, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4508.1.1
981F8794FF9CB220EAC5FF12AA33AD39.text	981F8794FF9CB220EAC5FF12AA33AD39.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Udamopyga provecta (Lopes 1939)	<div><p>Udamopyga provecta (Lopes, 1939)</p><p>(Figs 37–40, 50, 56)</p><p>Sarcophaga provecta Lopes, 1939: 122 –123. Type locality: Argentina, Missiones.</p><p>Udamopyga provecta: Lopes (1940: 937–938) .</p><p>References. Lopes (1940; placement in Udamopyga and revision); Dodge (1965; key); Lopes (1969a; catalog); Lopes (1988; key); Pape (1996; catalog); Mello-Patiu et al. (2009; checklist); Mello-Patiu et al. (2014; key to genera and list of species from Argentina); Buenaventura &amp; Pape (2018; sarcophagine phylogeny).</p><p>Type-material examined. HOLOTYPE ♂: “Est. Exp. [ Estación Experimental] Loreto / 1936. VI / Dr. A. Ogloblin [printed on white paper, black frame]” // [EX] “ Col. Ins. O. Cruz [Collection Instituto Oswaldo Cruz] / N. 10047 [microscope slide;printed on white paper]” // “ Holotype [printed on red paper, black frame]” // “ Sarcophaga / provecta / n. sp. / S. Lopes—Det. 937 [1937] [printed on white paper, black frame]” // “ MNRJ / 2298 [printed vertically on white paper]” [holotype in good condition; terminalia dissected and mounted on microscope slide].</p><p>ALLOTYPE ♀: same data as holotype (MNRJ) [in good condition,].</p><p>PARATYPES: 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀ (one allotype): same data as holotype (MNRJ) [paratypes in good condition, ♀ allotype with terminalia mounted on microscope slide N. 10048] .</p><p>Additional material examined. Argentina: 1 ♂, Salta Province, Department of San Martín, Aguaray, 500– 800m, 6–16.i.1957, P. Wygodzinsky leg. (MNRJ) . Brazil: 1 ♂, Mato Grosso, Dourados, iii.1974, M. Alvarenga &amp; O. Roppa leg. (MNRJ) ; 1 ♂, Rio de Janeiro, Nova Friburgo, Hotel Fazenda São João [Pico São João], 11.iii.1990, J. M. Costa &amp; S. Marshall leg. (MNRJ) ; 1 ♂, Rio Grande do Sul, Pelotas, 3.v.1961, C.M. Biezanko leg. (MNRJ) ; 2 ♂♂, Santa Catarina, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-52.383335&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-27.183332" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -52.383335/lat -27.183332)">Nova Teutônia</a> [Seara], 27°11’S 52°23’W, viii.1951, F. Plaumann leg. (MNRJ) .</p><p>Diagnosis. Male cercus with numerous long setae of the same length on cercal base (Figs 37–38, 50); vesica formed of two blackish and sclerotized lobes with a cracked-looking integument and inner ventral margin as two long projections covered with microtrichia (Figs 39–40, 50); juxta formed of two lobes, well-individualized juxtal lobes with latero-anterior membranous projections (Figs 39–40, 50). Female T6 undivided and convex along midline, without a longitudinal crease, and with conspicuous golden setulae along apical margin (Fig. 56); ST5 wider than long; ST7 about 3x as long as ST6, with a discal concavity near middle (Fig. 56); ST8 membranous and not very distinct; epiproct membranous, with two pairs of setae.</p><p>Redescription. Differs from U. squamata sp. nov. as follows:</p><p>Male (n = 8). Length: 8–13 mm; parafacial, fronto-orbital plate and posterior ocular orbits with golden pruinosity; frons about 0.22x head width at level of ocellar triangle; frontal vitta blackish along its whole length; 10–12 well-developed frontal setae reaching level of apex of pedicel; T5 with about 10 marginal setae and a set of long setae concentrated on ventral margin; cerci fused along their whole length and with apex truncate (posterior view), cercal prong blackish distally and with a small, anteriorly curved projection (lateral view) (Figs 37–38, 50); pregonite of similar length as postgonite, with a narrow apex, median projection and a weakly sclerotized area near apex in anterior margin (Fig. 39); postgonite almost straight, with narrow base and a long seta inserted almost in the middle (Fig. 39); basiphallus longer than distiphallus (Fig. 39); vesica formed of lobes with a dark margin, with a cracked-looking integument; inner ventral margin of vesica as two elongated projections covered with microtrichia (Figs 39–40, 50); juxtal lobes with latero-anterior membranous projections (Fig. 39); lateral stylus a bit shorter than median stylus (Fig. 40).</p><p>Female (n = 2). Length: 10–13 mm; frons about 0.27x head width at level of ocellar triangle; 9 well-developed frontal setae; ST4 with two pairs of long setae; ST5 wider than long; T6 undivided and convex along midline, without a longitudinal crease and with conspicuous golden setulae along posterior margin (Fig. 56); ST7 about 3x as long as ST6, with a discal concavity near middle (Fig. 56); ST8 membranous and not very distinct; epiproct membranous, with two pairs of setae (Lopes 1940: figs 35–36).</p><p>Distribution. Argentina (Misiones, Salta *); Brazil (Mato Grosso *, Rio de Janeiro, Rio Grande do Sul *, Santa Catarina).</p><p>Remarks. Udamopyga provecta is morphologically similar to U. percita and U. setigena . See remarks under U. percita .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/981F8794FF9CB220EAC5FF12AA33AD39	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Santos, Josenilson Rodrigues Dos;Mello-Patiu, Cátia Antunes De	Santos, Josenilson Rodrigues Dos, Mello-Patiu, Cátia Antunes De (2018): Review of the Brazilian species of Udamopyga Hall, 1938 (Diptera: Sarcophagidae), with the description of a new species and a key to males and females. Zootaxa 4508 (1): 1-27, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4508.1.1
981F8794FF9EB226EAC5FF12AA33AB57.text	981F8794FF9EB226EAC5FF12AA33AB57.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Udamopyga setigena (Enderlein 1928)	<div><p>Udamopyga setigena (Enderlein, 1928)</p><p>(Figs 4–6, 41–45, 51, 57)</p><p>Udamoctis setigena Enderlein, 1928: 129 –130. Type locality: Paraguay, Santa Trinidad. Sarcophaga ogloblini Lopes, 1939: 119 –121. Type locality: Argentina, Missiones. Merokellymyia nodositas Blanchard, 1939: 843 –845. Type locality: Argentina, Missiones. Udamopyga ogloblini: Lopes (1940: 940–941) . Udamopyga setigena: Hall (1938: 256) . References. Townsend (1931; placement in Micronotochaeta Townsend); Hall (1938; placement in Udamopyga); Lopes (1940;</p><p>comments and Merokellymyia nodositas as synonym of Udamopyga ogloblini); Travassos (1941; fieldwork report); Lopes</p><p>(1943; descriptions of larval instars 1 and 2, and Udamopyga ogloblini as synonym of U. setigena); Dodge (1965; key);</p><p>Lopes (1968; comments on U. setigena type); Lopes (1969a; catalog); Lopes (1988; key); Pape (1996; catalog); Mello-</p><p>Patiu et al. (2014; key to genera and list of species from Argentina); Dufek et al. (2015; checklist).</p><p>Type-material examined. HOLOTYPE ♂ of U. ogloblini: “Est. Exp. [ Estación Experimental] Loreto [Argentina, Misiones]/ 1936. v.22 / Dr. A. Ogloblin [printed on white paper, black frame]” // “ Holotype [printed on red paper, black frame]” // “ Sarcophaga / ogloblini / n. sp. / S. Lopes—Det. 937 [1937] [printed on white paper, black frame]” // “ MNRJ / 2300 [printed at vertical on white paper]” (MNRJ) [holotype in good condition; terminalia not dissected].</p><p>PARATYPES of U. ogloblini: 4 ♀ f, same data as holotype except vi.1936; 1 ♂: Brazil, Rio Grande do Sul, São João de Montenegro, i.1933, P. Dacorso leg ; 1 ♀: Brazil, Goiás, Campinas [Goiânia], i.1936, T. Borgmeier and H.S. Lopes leg. (MNRJ) [paratypes in good conditions; one ♀ from Argentina with terminalia mounted on microscope slide N o 13615] .</p><p>Additional material examined. Argentina: 1 ♂, Salta Province, Department of San Martín, Provincia de Salta, 500–800m, 10.i.1957, P. Wygodzinsky leg. Brazil: 1 ♂, Espírito Santo, Linhares, vi.1972, P.C. Elias leg. ; 1 ♂, Goiás, Goiânia, viii.1943, Freitas &amp; Nobre leg. ; 1 ♂, Mato Grosso do Sul, Miranda, Salobra, i.1941, Com. IOC leg. [Commission Instituto Oswaldo Cruz] ; 1 ♂, Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Reserva Biológica Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul, 23.x.2013, R. Toma leg. ; 1 ♂, Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, R. Di Primio leg. ; 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀, Santa Catarina, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-52.383335&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-27.183332" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -52.383335/lat -27.183332)">Nova Teutônia</a> [Seara], 27°11’S 52°23’W, vi.1960, F. Plaumann leg. Paraguay: 1 ♂, Central Department, Areguá, Isla Valle, vi.1944, Missão Científica Brasileira leg. (MNRJ).</p><p>Diagnosis. Male cercus with a tuft of long setae on cercal base (Figs 42–43, 51); vesica formed of two concave lobes with striated ornamentation and inner ventral margin as two spinose projections (Figs 4–6, 44–45, 51); juxta with two lobes, each with lateral margin turned backward near base in lateral view (Figs 4–6, 44–45). Female T6 undivided and convex along midline, without a longitudinal crease (Fig. 57); ST5 wider than long; ST7 about 3x as long as ST6, with a discal concavity near middle (Fig. 57); ST8 membranous and not very distinct; epiproct membranous, with two or three pairs of setae.</p><p>Redescription. Differs from U. squamata sp. nov. as follows:</p><p>Male (n = 10). Length: 9–15 mm; parafacial, fronto-orbital plate and postocular orbits with golden pruinosity; frons about 0.24x head width at level of ocellar triangle; 7–9 well-developed frontal setae reaching level of apex of pedicel; gena and genal groove with pale golden pruinosity; 10–12 meral setae; T5 with 12 marginal setae; ST5 with rounded arms and a short window with numerous setulae (Figs 41, 51); terminalia reddish-brown; cercal prong narrow in distal third (posterior view), blackish apically and projected anteriorly (lateral view) (Figs 42–43, 51); surstylus long, of similar length as cercus, with a very narrow base and numerous setae along anterior margin (Figs 42, 51); pregonite with a long, weakly sclerotized median projection (Fig. 44); postgonite straight with rounded apex and a long seta near apex (Fig. 44); basiphallus longer than distiphallus (Fig. 44); vesica formed of two concave lobes with striated ornamentation and inner ventral margin as two spinose projections (Figs 4–6, 44– 45, 51); juxta with two lobes, each medially projected in distal margin (ventral and dorsal views) and with lateral margin turned backward near base (lateral view) (Figs 4–6, 44–45, 51); lateral stylus narrow with a laterally elongated base and small spines in distal half; median stylus with a spinose apex (Figs 5, 45).</p><p>Female (n = 7). Length: 9–13 mm. Differs from male as follows: frons about 0.35x head width at level of ocellar triangle; T6 convex along midline dorsally, without a longitudinal crease (Fig. 57); ST2–3 with one pair of long setae; ST5 wider than long; terminalia yellowish brown; ST7 about 3x as long as ST6, with a discal concavity near middle (Fig. 57); ST8 membranous and not very distinct; vaginal plate weakly sclerotized; epiproct membranous, with two or three pairs of setae (Lopes 1940: figs 27–28; as U. oglobini).</p><p>Distribution. Argentina (Corrientes, Misiones, Salta *); Brazil (Espírito Santo *, Góias, Mato Grosso *, Mato Grosso do Sul, Rio de Janeiro, Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Catarina, São Paulo); Paraguay (Central*, Itapúa).</p><p>Remarks. Udamopyga setigena is morphologically similar to U. percita and U. provecta . See remarks under U. percita .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/981F8794FF9EB226EAC5FF12AA33AB57	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Santos, Josenilson Rodrigues Dos;Mello-Patiu, Cátia Antunes De	Santos, Josenilson Rodrigues Dos, Mello-Patiu, Cátia Antunes De (2018): Review of the Brazilian species of Udamopyga Hall, 1938 (Diptera: Sarcophagidae), with the description of a new species and a key to males and females. Zootaxa 4508 (1): 1-27, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4508.1.1
981F8794FF9AB226EAC5FEF5AEA6AFD8.text	981F8794FF9AB226EAC5FEF5AEA6AFD8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Udamopyga Hall 1938	<div><p>Key to adult males and females of Udamopyga from Brazil</p><p>1. Proclinate orbital setae absent (males)..................................................................... 2</p><p>- Proclinate orbital setae present (females)................................................................... 8</p><p>2. Juxta wider than long, rounded in lateral and ventral views, with squamous ornamentation (Figs 10–11); vesica with two rounded lobes and inner ventral margin as ladle-shaped projections............ U. squamata Santos &amp; Mello-Patiu sp. nov.</p><p>- Juxta longer than wide, rectangular or sub-rectangular in lateral view without squamous ornamentation (Figs 21, 25, 30); vesica with inner ventral margin not as ladle-shaped projections.................................................... 3</p><p>3. Three postsutural dorsocentral setae; vesica with conspicuous lateroventral spinose ornamentation and inner ventral margin as two spinose projections (Figs 21–22)......................................................... U. diversa Lopes</p><p>- Four postsutural dorsocentral setae; vesica ornamentation and inner ventral margin not as above....................... 4</p><p>4. Juxtal lobes with lateral projections (Figs 35–36, 39–40)...................................................... 5</p><p>- Juxtal lobes without lateral projections (Figs 25–26, 30–31).................................................... 6</p><p>5. Vesica rounded with a central, convex and well-delimited membranous area; juxta with latero-posterior rounded flaps (ventral view) (Figs 3, 35)....................................................................... U. percita (Lopes)</p><p>- Vesica rounded, with a poorly-delimited membranous central area; juxtal lobes with latero-anterior membranous projections (Fig. 39).............................................................................. U. provecta (Lopes)</p><p>6. Lobe-shaped arms of vesica with striated ornamentation (Figs 4–6, 44–45, 51)................... U. setigena (Enderlein)</p><p>- Lobe-shaped arms of vesica with spinose ornamentation or without ornamentation (Figs 25, 30)....................... 7</p><p>7. Distal half of cercal prong almost straight in lateral view; juxtal lobes with a concave depression on the distal margin; lobeshaped arms of vesica with spinose ornamentation (Figs 25–26, 47)............................. U. malacophila Lopes</p><p>- Distal half of cercal prong slightly curved anteriorly in lateral view; juxtal lobes with a slightly convex dilatation on the distal margin; lobe-shaped arms of vesica without ornamentation (Figs 30–31, 48)........................... U. neivai Lopes</p><p>8. T6 with a longitudinal crease along midline dorsally and roof-like appearance (Figs 53–54)........................... 9</p><p>- T6 convex along midline dorsally, without a longitudinal crease (Figs 55–56)..................................... 11</p><p>9. ST5 as long as wide (Fig. 12).......................................... U. squamata Santos &amp; Mello-Patiu sp. nov.</p><p>- ST5 longer than wide................................................................................. 10</p><p>10. T6 yellowish-brown, with a well-marked longitudinal crease; epiproct absent (Fig. 53)............. U. malacophila Lopes</p><p>- T6 reddish-brown, with a less marked longitudinal crease; epiproct with two pairs of setae (Fig. 54)........ U. neivai Lopes</p><p>11. Three postsutural dorsocentral setae.......................................................... U. diversa Lopes</p><p>- Four postsutural dorsocentral setae....................................................................... 12</p><p>12. T6 with conspicuous golden setulae along posterior margin (Fig. 56).............................. U. provecta (Lopes)</p><p>- T6 without golden setulae along posterior margin........................................................... 13</p><p>13. T6 opening, i.e., posterior border, forming a concave curve in ventral view; epiproct absent (Fig. 55)..... U. percita (Lopes)</p><p>- T6 opening, i.e., posterior border, forming a somewhat sub-quadrangular or inverted U-shaped curve in ventral view; epiproct with two pairs of setae (Fig. 57)........................................................ U. setigena (Enderlein)</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/981F8794FF9AB226EAC5FEF5AEA6AFD8	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Santos, Josenilson Rodrigues Dos;Mello-Patiu, Cátia Antunes De	Santos, Josenilson Rodrigues Dos, Mello-Patiu, Cátia Antunes De (2018): Review of the Brazilian species of Udamopyga Hall, 1938 (Diptera: Sarcophagidae), with the description of a new species and a key to males and females. Zootaxa 4508 (1): 1-27, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4508.1.1
