identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
9D50A226FF90FF8B5DB6FAD2FC4FFD6A.text	9D50A226FF90FF8B5DB6FAD2FC4FFD6A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Eopompilus Gussakovskij 1932	<div><p>Eopompilus Gussakovskij, 1932</p><p>Eopompilus Gussakovskij, 1932: 34, ♀; Haupt 1934: 15; Ishikawa 1962: 331, ♀, ♂ ; 1965a: 510, ♀ ♂; 1965: 295; Lelej 1986: 80, ♀ ♂ ; 1995: 212, 216, 224, ♀ ♂; 2000: 621; Hirashima 1989: 662; Lelej &amp; Yamane 1992: 102, ♀ ; Lelej et al. 1994: 138, ♀ ♂ ; Shimizu 1996a: 320, 324, ♀ ♂ ; 1996b: 507; Yamane et al. 1999: 344, ♀ ♂ ; Lelej &amp; Loktionov 2012: 412; Loktionov &amp; Lelej 2014: 94, ♀, ♂ ; 2015: 90, 91, 100, ♀ ♂; Ji et al. 2015: 2, ♀ ♂ ; Shimizu &amp; Terayama 2016: 183, 186, 205, ♀ ♂ .</p><p>Sialus Matsumura, 1911: 136 . Subsequent misspelling of Salius Fabricius, 1804 . Unavailable name according to Article 33.3 of the Code (ICZN 1999).</p><p>Salius: Matsumura 1912: 188, ♀ ♂; 1931: 24, part.</p><p>Priocnemis: Yano 1932: 288 .</p><p>Type species. Eopompilus orientalis Gussakovskij, 1932 = Sialus (!) internalis Matsumura, 1911, by original designation.</p><p>Diagnosis. Females. Females are easily separated from all other genera of tribe Priocnemini by having inner side of metatibia with smooth furrow along upper margin of brush, S2 with weak transverse furrow, and face along inner orbit always with yellow or ivory strip. Other characters of importance are: first flagellomere 5.0–6.3 times its width; propodeum matt and smooth, sometimes with dense soft punctures; claws with additional small tooth; body black or brown with few or abundant yellow spots on: head, mesosoma, metasoma and legs, face along inner orbit always with yellow spots; antenna from black with yellow-orange ventral side to almost yellow-brown (Figs 1, 3, 7, 8).</p><p>Males. Males are easily separated from all other genera of tribe Priocnemini by having posterior margin of S6 with row of dense short equal length bristles (Fig. 17), and flagellomeres 2–11 serrate beneath (Fig. 2). Other characters of importance are: first flagellomere 2.3–4.2 times its width; propodeum smooth or with dense punctures; tarsal claws usually without additional tooth, but sometimes bifid, with additional inner small tooth; body black or dark brown with few or abundant yellow (yellow-orange) spots on: head, mesosoma, metasoma and legs (Figs 2, 4, 5, 6).</p><p>Species included. Eopompilus internalis (Matsumura, 1911) (Russia: Far East; South Korea; Japan: from Hokkaido in the North to Tanegashima in the South); E. minor Gussakovskij, 1932 (Russia: Far East; China: Heilongjiang, Hebei, Ningxia, Henan, Taiwan; South Korea; Japan: from Hokkaido in the North to Yakushima in the South); E. luteus Lelej, 1986 (Russia: Far East; China: Heilongjiang, Ningxia, Hebei, Henan) ; E. ungulivarius Ji &amp; Ma, 2015 (China: Ningxia) ; E. pseudominor Loktionov, Lelej &amp; Xu, sp. nov. (China: Yunnan) .</p><p>Distribution. Palaearctic: Russia (the South of the Far East), China (Inner Mongolia, Heilongjiang, Ningxia, Hebei, Henan), South Korea, Japan (from Hokkaido in the North to Yakushima in the South). Oriental Region: China (Yunnan, Taiwan).</p><p>Biology. Spiders ( Araneae) from the genera Achaearanea Strand, Theridion Walckenaer (Theridiidae), Leucauge White (Tetragnathidae) (Nambu &amp; Shimizu 1994, Lelej 1995, Loktionov &amp; Lelej 2014), and Araneus Clerck (Araneidae) have been recorded as hosts (see below) (Fig. 43).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/9D50A226FF90FF8B5DB6FAD2FC4FFD6A	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Loktionov, Valery M.;Lelej, Arkady S.;Xu, Zaifu	Loktionov, Valery M., Lelej, Arkady S., Xu, Zaifu (2017): Review of the genus Eopompilus Gussakovskij, 1932 (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) with the description of new species from China. Zootaxa 4277 (3): 413-426, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4277.3.6
9D50A226FF93FF8A5DB6FCAFFB7FFAAA.text	9D50A226FF93FF8A5DB6FCAFFB7FFAAA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Eopompilus internalis (Matsumura 1911) Matsumura 1911	<div><p>Eopompilus internalis (Matsumura, 1911)</p><p>(Figs 1, 2, 15, 17, 19, 22, 26–29)</p><p>Sialus (!) internalis Matsumura, 1911: 136, pl. 41, fig. 7, ♀. Syntypes, ♀, " Tokyo ( Nakano)" [Japan, Honshu], [EIHU].</p><p>Sialus (!) bizonatus Matsumura, 1912: 189, pl. 53, fig. 19, ♀. Syntypes, ♀, "Tokyo" [Japan, Honshu], [EIHU]. Junior subjective synonym of Eopompilus internalis (Matsumura, 1911) according to Ishikawa 1962: 334.</p><p>Salius internalis: Matsumura 1930: 34, ♀.</p><p>Salius bizonatus: Matsumura 1930: 65, ♀; 1931: 24.</p><p>Eopompilus orientalis Gussakovskij, 1932: 36, ♀. Lectotype, designated here, ♀, "Vladivostok, Sedanka, 1.VIII. [19]30 (Malaise)" [Russia, Primorskii Terr.], [ZISP]. Junior subjective synonym of Eopompilus internalis (Matsumura, 1911) according to Ishikawa 1962: 334.</p><p>Priocnemis bizonatus: Yano 1932: 288 .</p><p>Eopompilus internalis: Ishikawa 1962: 334, ♀ ♂ ; 1965b: 295; Lelej 1986: 80, ♀ ♂ ; 1995: 226, ♀, ♂; 2000: 621; Hirashima 1989: 662; Lelej &amp; Yamane 1992: 102, ♀ ; Lelej et al. 1994: 138, ♀ ♂ ; Shimizu 1996b: 507; Yamane et al. 1999: 344, ♀ ♂ ; Lelej &amp; Loktionov 2012: 412; Loktionov &amp; Lelej 2014: 95, ♀, ♂ ; Ji et al. 2015: 2, 3, ♀ ♂ ; Shimizu &amp; Terayama 2016: 205, 500, 596, ♀ ♂ .</p><p>Diagnosis. Female. Female of this species can be easily separated from all other species by having large body size (length 13.0–24.0 mm) and body mostly black with light yellow spots along inner orbit and T2, T3, S2, S3. Other characters of importance are: propodeum matt without punctures; first flagellomere 5.3–5.8 times its width; claw with subbasal additional tooth; antenna black with orange-yellow ventral side of flagellomeres 1–5 (Fig. 1); forewing brownish, with distinct apical darker spot from marginal, second and third submarginal and apical half of second discoidal cells to wing apex (Fig. 26).</p><p>Male. Male of this species can be easily separated from all other species by having large body size (length 10.0–16.5 mm) and postero-lateral corners of S6 and S7 strongly convex (Fig. 17). Other characters of importance are: first flagellomere 3.6–4.0 times its width; propodeum with fine weakly noticeable punctures; claws symmetrical without additional tooth; hypopygium narrow apically and strongly widened subbasally (Fig. 22); paramere pointed apically (Fig. 19); forewing brownish, with distinct apical darker spot from marginal, second and third submarginal and apical half of second discoidal cells to wing apex; pterostigma brown (Fig. 28); body mostly black with light yellow spots on: face, gena, T2, T3, S3, S4 and proleg; antenna mostly black (Fig. 2).</p><p>Material examined. Type material. Lectotype of Eopompilus orientalis Gussakovskij, 1932, designated here, ♀ " Vladivostok / Sedanka / Malaise // 1-VIII-30 // Eopompilus ♀ / orientalis g. t. sp. n. / V. Gussakovskij //к. Гуссаковского [Cyrillic] // Lectotypus / Eopompilus ♀ / orientalis Guss. / Lelej &amp; Lokt. det" [ZISP]. Other material. RUSSIA. Amur Prov.: 1 ♂, Natalyno, 11.VII.1975 (A. Lelej). Primorskij Terr.: 5 ♀, Ryazanovka, 30.VII.1982, 6.IX.1986, 2.IX1987, 29.VIII.1987, 27.VIII.1992 (E. Belyaev, Zinoviev) ; 1 ♀, Telyakovskogo Bay, 6.VIII.2005 (E. Belyaev, M. Ponomarenko) ; 1 ♀, Vityaz, 14.IX.1996 (Yu. Tchistyakov) ; 1 ♀ 1 ♂, Andreevka, 4.VIII.1985, 3–5. VIII.2 0 0 3 (S. Belokobylskij, E. Belyaev, M. Ponomarenko) ; 9 ♀ 1 ♂, Kedrovaya Pad Natural Reserve, 7.VIII.1975, 12, 26.VIII, 5, 25.IX.1976, 21.VIII.1979 (S. Belokobylskij, S. Berezantzev, Nikolaev, Ryabuhin) ; 1 ♀, Alekseevka, 25.VIII.1987 (A. Lelej) ; 2 ♀ 1 ♂, Vladivostok, 26.VII, 23.IX.1984, 23.VIII.1989 (S. Belokobylskij, P. Lehr, A. Tchetchvarhin) ; 8 ♀, Anisimovka, 20.VIII, 1.IX.1974, 21.VIII.1975, 28.VIII, 23.IX.1976, 10.VIII.1992 (A. Lelej, S. Berezantzev, P. Lehr, Dahno, S. Storozhenko, Bulavskij) ; 1 ♀, Preobrazhenie, 10.IX.1979 (T. Romankova) ; 5 ♀ 1 ♂, Lazovskii Natural Reserve, 23.IX.1974, 22.VII.1993, 4.X.2007, 25.VIII–3.IX.2006, 4–7.VIII.2008 (Yu. Sundukov, V. Shokhrin, S. Belokobylskij, D. Kochetkov, S. Berezantzev, T. Romankova) ; 1 ♀, Tchandalaz Mountain Ridge, 7.VIII.1995 (E. Belyaev, M. Ponomarenko) ; 1 ♀, Nikolo-Lvovsk, 20–21.VII.2004 (A. Tatarinov) ; 1 ♀, Kamenushka, 18.VIII.1981 (V. Mutin) ; 1 ♀ 1 ♂, Gornotaezhnoe, 15.IX.1982, 16.VII.1983 (V. Tobias, E. Budris) ; 6 ♀, Ussuri Natural Reserve, 9.VIII.1954, 2.VIII.1985, 9.IX.1987, 22.VIII.1989, 9.IX.1992 (P. Lehr, A. Lelej, S. Belokobylskij, D. Kononov) ; 1 ♂, Novokachalinsk, 21.VII.1995 (S. Belokobylskij) ; 2 ♀, 30 km NW of Arsenyev, 31.VII.1999, 13–17.VIII.2003 (E. Belyaev, M. Ponomarenko) ; 1 ♂, Spassk, 3–6.VII.1993 (S. Belokobylskij) ; 1 ♀, 20 km SE of Spassk, Evseevka, 8.VIII.1981 (A. Lelej) ; 1 ♂, 30 km E of Spassk, Vasilievka, 13.VII. 1 993 (S. Belokobylskij) ; 1 ♂, 20 km ESE of Spassk, 16.VII.1998 (S. Belokobylskij) ; 1 ♀, Kalinovka, 23.VII.2009 (V. Loktionov) ; 1 ♀, Sokolovka, 19.VIII.1983 (T. Romankova) ; 2 ♀, Tchuguevskii District, Upper part of Pravaya Sokolovka River, 12, 20.VIII.2008 (V. Loktionov) ; 1 ♀, Dersu, 25.VIII.1991 (P. Nemkov) ; 1 ♀, Roschino, 20.VIII.2001 (V. Kuznetzov) ; 1 ♂, Dalnij Kut, 26.VIII.1991 (P. Nemkov). Sakhalin Island: 1 ♀, 10 km E of Boshnyakovo, 24.VII.2003 (V. Bogatov). Kuril Islands (Kunashir): 3 ♀ 4 ♂, 10 km S of Yuzhno-Kurilsk, Rosinka, 28.VIII.1980 (A. Lelej) ; 1 ♀ 2 ♂, 9 km S of Yuzhno-Kurilsk, Kislaya River, 27.VII.1989 (A. Lelej) ; 1 ♀, Goryachee Lake, 13.IX.1976 (V. Kuznetzov) ; 1 ♀, Sernovodsk, 12.VII.1962 (Konovalova) ; 1 ♀ 2 ♂, Aliger Lake, 11.VIII.1998 (S. Storozhenko) ; 1 ♀, caldera of Golovnino Volcano, 19.VIII.1975 (S. Berezantzev) ; 5 ♀ 1 ♂, Mendeleevo, 27.VIII.1974, 12.IX.1975 (B. Korotyaev, Kirpitchnikova) ; 1 ♂, 7 km S of Lagunnoe Lake, 15.VIII.1989 (A. Lelej) ; 1 ♂, Dubovoe, 7.VIII.1980 (A. Lelej). [IBSS]. JAPAN. Hokkaido: 2 ♂, Shiretoku, Hinoderindo, 14.VII.1998 (A. Lelej) ; 1 ♀, Kamikawa-cho, 17.VIII.1985 (N. Yasuda). Honshu: 2 ♀, Saitama Pref., Chichibu-shi, Otaki-mura, Kawamata, 19.VIII.1983, 21–24.VIII.2006 (A. Shimizu) ; 1 ♀, Shimane Pref., Mt. Oyorogi, 650 m., 7.VIII.1993 (A. Lelej) ; 1 ♀, Gunma Pref., Mt. Hotaka, 17.VII.1977 (H. Itami) ; 1 ♀, Fukui Pref., Ono-shi, Arashi, 400–600 m., 31.VII.1993 (N. Kurzenko). Ryukyu, Yaku-shima: 1 ♂, Arakawa, 1200 m., 28.VI–29.VII.2007 (T. Yamauchi). [IBSS].</p><p>Distribution. Russia (Far East: Amur Prov., Khabarovsk Terr., Primorskii Terr., Sakhalin, Kurils), South Korea (Loktionov &amp; Lelej 2014), Japan (from Hokkaido in the North to Tanegashima and Kuroshima in the South) (Yamane et al. 1999; Shimizu &amp; Terayama 2016).</p><p>Biology. Host is spider Leucauge celebesiana (Walckenaer) (Nambu &amp; Shimizu 1994).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/9D50A226FF93FF8A5DB6FCAFFB7FFAAA	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Loktionov, Valery M.;Lelej, Arkady S.;Xu, Zaifu	Loktionov, Valery M., Lelej, Arkady S., Xu, Zaifu (2017): Review of the genus Eopompilus Gussakovskij, 1932 (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) with the description of new species from China. Zootaxa 4277 (3): 413-426, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4277.3.6
9D50A226FF92FF8C5DB6FA6FFD98F917.text	9D50A226FF92FF8C5DB6FA6FFD98F917.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Eopompilus minor Gussakovskij 1932	<div><p>Eopompilus minor Gussakovskij, 1932</p><p>(Figs 3, 4, 16, 20, 24, 34–38)</p><p>Eopompilus minor Gussakovskij, 1932: 36, ♀ (holotype, ♀, "Sedanka, 12.VII. [19]30 (Malaise)" [Russia, Primorskii Terr., environs of Vladivostok], [SMNH]); Ishikawa 1962: 334, ♀ ♂ ; 1965b: 295; Lelej 1986: 80, 81 ♀ ♂; 1995: 226, ♀, ♂; 2000: 622, ♀ ♂; Hirashima 1989: 662; Lelej &amp; Yamane 1992: 102, ♀; Lelej et al. 1994: 139, ♀; Shimizu 1996b: 507; Yamane et al. 1999: 345, ♀ ♂; Lelej &amp; Loktionov 2012: 412; Ma &amp; Li 2013: 446, ♂; Loktionov &amp; Lelej 2014: 94, 95, 99, ♀, ♂; Shimizu &amp; Terayama 2016: 205, 500, 596, ♀ ♂.</p><p>Eopompilus minor itoi Ishikawa, 1965a: 511, ♀ (holotype, ♀, " Sungkang, 2000 m to Tsifeng, 2300 m, Nantou Hsien, Taiwan, 29.VI.1965, S. Ito " [NSMT]), syn. nov.</p><p>Eopompilus minor itoi: Hua 2006: 311; Ji et al. 2015: 3, ♀ ♂.</p><p>Eopompilus minor minor: Ji et al. 2015: 2, 3, ♀ ♂.</p><p>Diagnosis. Female. Female of this species can be easily separated from all other species by having clypeus with deep concavity along lateral margin; propodeum without distinct punctures (Fig. 16); vein cu-a of forewing straight and vein M weakly arched (Figs 34, 38). Other characters of importance are: claw with subapical additional tooth; body black with yellow spots on: face along inner orbit, pronotum laterally and posteriorly, T2 and T3 basally (Fig. 3); first flagellomere 5.2–5.9 times its width.</p><p>Male. Male of this species can be easily separated from all other species by having proclaws asymmetrical (inner claw much longer then outer one); volsella abnormally enlarged, paramere rounded apically (Fig. 20) and hypopygium narrowed subbasally and weakly widened subapically (Fig. 24). Other characters of importance are: posterior margin of S6 with small emargination medially; first flagellomere 2.4–2.8 times its width; propodeum with fine weakly noticeable punctures.</p><p>Material examined. Other material. RUSSIA. Primorskij Terr.: 1 ♀, Ryazanovka, 17.VIII.1992 (E. Belyaev) ; 1 ♂, 5 km SW of Nezhino, 18.VII.1993 (S. Belokobylskij) ; 4 ♀ 1 ♂, Anisimovka, 11.VII.1984, 2.IX.1988, 7.VIII.1993 (S. Belokobylskij, E. Belyaev) ; 1 ♀, 6 km S of Tikhookeanskij, Domashlino, 26.VIII.1978 (A. Lelej) ; 1 ♀ 2 ♂, Lazovskii Natural Reserve, 16.VIII.1986, 22.VII.1993, 21.VIII.2008 (S. Belokobylskij, V. Kotenko, Yu. Sundukov) ; 1 ♀, Brovnichi, Tigrovaya River, 16.VIII.1985 (A. Lelej) ; 1 ♂, Lazovyi, Tchandalaz Mountain Ridge, 17.VII.1979 (S. Belokobylskij) ; 1 ♂, Novitzkoe, 20.VIII.1984 (S. Belokobylskij) ; 1 ♀, Ussuriisk, 20.VII.2008 (V. Loktionov) ; 1 ♀, Kamenushka, 31.VIII.2001 ; 2 ♀, 20 km SW of Krounovka, 3,4. VIII.1993 (S. Belokobylskij) ; 2 ♀ 1 ♂, Novokachalinsk, 2.IX.1986, 23, 25.VII.1995 (S. Belokobylskij, V. Kotenko) ; 8 ♂, Spassk, 3–6, 11, 12.VII.1993, 21.VII.1998 (S. Belokobylskij) ; 1 ♀ 1 ♂, 20 km ESE of Spassk, 16.VII.1998 (S. Belokobylskij) ; 1 ♂, 20 km E of Spassk, Evseevka, 9.VII.1993 (S. Belokobylskij) ; 1 ♂, 35 km E of Spassk, Vasilievka, 13.VII.1993 (S. Belokobylskij) ; 5 ♀, Tchuguevskii District, Upper part of Pravaya Sokolovka River, 12, 17, 18, 20.VIII.2008 (V. Loktionov) ; 2 ♂, Scherbakovka, 25.VII. 1 979 (S. Belokobylskij) ; 1 ♀, 20 km NW of Melnitchnoe, Bolshaya Ussurka River, 2.VIII.1986 (A. Lelej) ; 1 ♀, Dalnegorsk District, Kamenka, 7.VIII.1979 (S. Belokobylskij) ; 1 ♀, Dersu, 27.VIII.1991 (P. Nemkov). Kuril Islands (Kunashir): 1 ♀, Mendeleevo, 12.IX.1975 (B. Korotyaev) ; 1 ♀, 6 km N of Mendeleevo, 4.VIII.1975 (S. Berezantzev) ; 1 ♀, Goryachee Lake, 12.VIII.1980 (A. Lelej) ; 1 ♀ 1 ♂, caldera of Golovnino Volcano, 2, 3.VIII.1989 (A. Lelej) ; 2 ♀, Tretyakovo, 20.VIII.1980, 24.VI.1984 (A. Lelej, V. Makarkin) ; 1 ♀, Aliger Lake, 11.VIII.1998 (S. Storozhenko). [IBSS]. CHINA . 1 ♀ 1 ♂, Henan, Baotianman National Nature Reserve, 22.VII.2007 (Zai-fu Xu), 2016001783, 2016001779 [SCAU]. JAPAN. Hokkaido: 1 ♀ 1 ♂, Shiretoku, Hinoderindo, 14.VII.1998 (A. Lelej). Honshu: 1 ♀, Saitama Pref., Chichibu-shi, Yoshidamachi, Onagata, 19.VII.1997 (A. Shimizu) ; 1 ♂, Saitama Pref., Chichibu-shi, Otaki, Irikawa forest road, 20.VII.2013 (N. Kikuchi) ; 1 ♀, Saitama Pref., Jumonj-san, Ootakimura, Chichibu-gun, 2.VIII.1984 (A. Shimizu) ; 1 ♀, Niigata Pref., Suginosawa, 1000 m., Myoko-kogen, 26.VII.1993 (A. Lelej). [IBSS].</p><p>Distribution. Russia (Far East: Primorskii Terr., Sakhalin, Kurils) (Loktionov &amp; Lelej 2014, 2015), China (Heilongjiang, Hebei, Ningxia, * Henan, Taiwan) (Ishikawa 1965a, Ma &amp; Li 2013), South Korea (Lelej et al. 1994), Japan (from Hokkaido in the North to Yakushima in the South) (Yamane et al. 1999; Shimizu &amp; Terayama 2016).</p><p>Variability (female). Body black. Most specimens with yellowish streak along inner orbit only. Sometimes T2 and T3 or one of them basally with distinct or not obvious yellow spots. Specimens from Taiwan (Ishikawa 1965a) have yellow spots on the above mentioned structures, as well as on basal half of mandible, antero-laterally and dorso-posteriorly on pronotum, postero-laterally on lower metapleuron, upper part of metacoxa. Coloration of setae on T6 and S6 from brown to pale brown and sometimes almost whitish.</p><p>Biology. Host is spiders Achaearanea japonica (Bösenberg &amp; Strand, 1906) and Theridion sp. (Nambu &amp; Shimizu 1994, Lelej 1995, Loktionov &amp; Lelej 2014).</p><p>Remarks. R. Ishikawa (1965a) proposed a new subspecies, E. minor itoi, based on the following characters: third radiomedial vein of forewing weakly arched, as in Fig. 38 (subangulate in E. minor minor, as in Fig. 34), erect setae on metasoma apically from whitish to pale fulvous (dark in E. minor minor). We studied 33 females of E. minor from the south of the Russian Far East, Japan (Hokkaido, Honshu) and China (Henan). These females possess both variations of each character, therefore we consider E. minor itoi Ishikawa, 1965 a junior subjective synonym of E. minor Gussakovskij, 1932 .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/9D50A226FF92FF8C5DB6FA6FFD98F917	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Loktionov, Valery M.;Lelej, Arkady S.;Xu, Zaifu	Loktionov, Valery M., Lelej, Arkady S., Xu, Zaifu (2017): Review of the genus Eopompilus Gussakovskij, 1932 (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) with the description of new species from China. Zootaxa 4277 (3): 413-426, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4277.3.6
9D50A226FF94FF8F5DB6F938FC5DFC52.text	9D50A226FF94FF8F5DB6F938FC5DFC52.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Eopompilus luteus Lelej 1986	<div><p>Eopompilus luteus Lelej, 1986</p><p>(Figs 6, 7, 18, 23, 30–33, 43)</p><p>Eopompilus luteus Lelej, 1986: 80, 81, ♂ (holotype, ♂, " Russia, Primorskii Terr., Khasan District, Andreevka, 27.VIII.1983 (Budris)" [ZISP]); Lelej 1995: 225, 226, ♀, ♂ ; Ma &amp; Li 2010: 367, ♀; Lelej &amp; Loktionov 2012: 412; Loktionov &amp; Lelej 2014: 95, 98, ♀, ♂; Ji et al. 2015: 2, 3, ♀ ♂.</p><p>Diagnosis. Female. Female of this species can be easily separated from all other species by having large body size (length 13.5–17.0 mm), body brown with abundant yellow spots on: head, mesosoma and metasoma, legs; and antenna mostly orange-yellow (Figs 7, 43). Other characters of importance are: forewing yellowish, without apical dark spot (Fig. 30); claw with subbasal additional tooth; propodeum matt without punctures and first flagellomere 5.8–6.3 times its width.</p><p>Male. Male of this species can be easily separated from all other species by having body dark brown with abundant yellow spots on: head, mesosoma and metasoma, legs; antenna mostly orange-yellow (Fig. 6); and large body size (length 10.0 mm). Other characters of importance are: pterostigma yellow (Fig. 32); first flagellomere 4.0–4.2 times its width; propodeum with fine weakly noticeable punctures; claws symmetrical without additional tooth.</p><p>Material examined. Type material. Holotype, ♂, " Russia, Primorskii Terr., Khasan District, Andreevka, 27.VIII.1983 (Budris)" [ZISP] . Other material. RUSSIA. Far East: Primorskii Terr.: 1 ♂, Khasan, 13.VIII.1998 (S. Belokobylskij) ; 4 ♀, Ryazanovka, 16.VIII.1986, 2. IX.1 987, 17.VIII.1992, 11.IX.1996 (E. Belyaev, S. Belokobylskij) ; 1 ♀, Gamova Peninsular, Srednyaya Bay, 19.IX.2012 (E. Belyaev) [IBSS] . CHINA. 1 ♀, Henan, Baotianman National Nature Reserve, 22.VII.2007 (Zai-fu Xu), 2016001744 [SCAU] .</p><p>Distribution. Russia (Far East: Primorskii Terr.) (Loktionov &amp; Lelej 2014), China (Heilongjiang, Ningxia, Hebei, * Henan) (Li &amp; Ma 2010).</p><p>Biology. The material from Russia was collected by a light trap, but these wasps are also active at day time. The host, Araneus ventricosus (L. Koch, 1878) (new record) is a large spider with abdomen length 15–17 mm, which makes a round web. The female was observed near the spiderweb and touching the distal line of the web with the wing. The female then waited for the spider on the nearest leaf of tree or bush. When the spider was caught and paralyzed, the female transported it (Fig. 43) moving on the ground by head first to a nest. The nests were observed under stones, on the roof and in the basement of wood buildings located near a forest. The female did not amputate the spider's legs. In Primorskij Terr. the female is active in mid-August–mid-September. During this period one female can hunt at least ten females of Araneus ventricosus .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/9D50A226FF94FF8F5DB6F938FC5DFC52	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Loktionov, Valery M.;Lelej, Arkady S.;Xu, Zaifu	Loktionov, Valery M., Lelej, Arkady S., Xu, Zaifu (2017): Review of the genus Eopompilus Gussakovskij, 1932 (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) with the description of new species from China. Zootaxa 4277 (3): 413-426, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4277.3.6
9D50A226FF97FF8F5DB6FBF7FD38F9BA.text	9D50A226FF97FF8F5DB6FBF7FD38F9BA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Eopompilus ungulivarius Ji & Ma in Ji et al. 2015	<div><p>Eopompilus ungulivarius Ji &amp; Ma, 2015</p><p>(Figs 5, 21, 25, 39, 40)</p><p>Eopompilus ungulivarius Ji &amp; Ma in Ji et al. 2015: 3, ♂. Holotype, ♂, " China, Ningxia, Guyuan City, Liupanshan Mountain, Erlonghe Forestry Center, 1985 m, 10.VII.2009 (Z. Zu)" [YNAU].</p><p>Diagnosis. Male. Male of this species can be easily separated from all other species by having proclaw bifid, mesoclaw almost bifid, metaclaw with small additional tooth and hypopygium strongly widened and capitate apically (Fig. 25). Other characters of importance are: propodeum with distinct punctures; body black with yellowish spots on: face along inner orbit, clypeus laterally, gena along outer orbit, pronotum antero-laterally, procoxa apically, T3 basally (Fig. 5). Female. Unknown.</p><p>Material examined. Other material. CHINA. Ningxia: 6 ♂, Ningxia, Liupanshan National Nature Reserve, 03-14.IX.2006 (Hua-yan Chen), 2016001395, 2016001410, 2016001418, 2016001420, 2016001424, 2016001427 [SCAU].</p><p>Distribution. China (Ningxia) (Ji et al. 2015).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/9D50A226FF97FF8F5DB6FBF7FD38F9BA	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Loktionov, Valery M.;Lelej, Arkady S.;Xu, Zaifu	Loktionov, Valery M., Lelej, Arkady S., Xu, Zaifu (2017): Review of the genus Eopompilus Gussakovskij, 1932 (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) with the description of new species from China. Zootaxa 4277 (3): 413-426, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4277.3.6
9D50A226FF97FF805DB6F99FFEB7F823.text	9D50A226FF97FF805DB6F99FFEB7F823.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Eopompilus pseudominor Loktionov, Lelej & Xu 2017	<div><p>Eopompilus pseudominor Loktionov, Lelej &amp; Xu, sp. nov.</p><p>(Figs 8–14, 41, 42)</p><p>Type material. Holotype, ♀, " China, Yunnan, Gaoligongshan National Nature Reserve, 01–18.VIII.2005 ( Juanjuan Ma), 2016001892" [SCAU].</p><p>Diagnosis. Female. Female of new species can be easily separated from all other species by having clypeus with deep concavity along lateral margin (Figs 11, 12); disc of propodeum with distinct soft dense punctures (Fig. 13); vein cu-a of forewing distinctly arched and vein M strongly arched (Fig. 41). Other characters of importance are: first flagellomere 5.0 times its width; claw with subapical additional tooth; yellow spots on: face along inner orbit, gena along outer orbit, pronotum laterally and posteriorly, disc of scutum, scutellum and metanotum, propodeum posteriorly, T1–T4 basally, all coxae, profemur (Figs 8–14). Male. Unknown.</p><p>Description. FEMALE. Length: body 8.2 mm; forewing 7.5 mm. Head. Width of head 1.2 times its height (Fig. 11). Ocelli small, ratio POD/OOD 0.8 times (Fig. 14). Width of gena medially 0.45 times width of eye medially (lateral view) (Fig. 9). Half of median interocular distance 1.3 times eye width (Fig. 11). Head gently rounded above (frontal view) (Fig. 11). Vertex almost straight medially and gently rounded laterally (Fig. 14). Clypeus convex, its width 2.6 times its length; anterior margin with three weak processes; width of clypeus between antero-lateral corners 0.45 times its maximum width; with deep concavity along lateral margin (Figs 11, 12). Anterior border of labrum with median emargination. Mandible broad, pointed apically, with one inner tooth. Malar space 0.1 times pedicel width. Relation of scape, pedicel and flagellomeres 21:8:32:25:24:21:20:19:19:18:17:20. First flagellomere 5.0 times its width and 0.9 times longer than vertex width. Flagellomeres 4–8 ventro-basally weakly convex. Apical flagellomere pointed apically.</p><p>Mesosoma. Pronotum with anterior declivity slightly concave, not differentiated from dorsum; dorsally with almost parallel sides; shoulders gently rounded; 0.3 times its width medially; posterior border angulate (Fig. 14). Disc of scutellum and metanotum raised above level of mesoscutum and propodeum. Metanotum medially 0.5 times metapostnotum length medially. Propodeum evenly convex, with posterior declivity not well differentiated from dorsum (Fig. 9); dorsally weakly narrowed posterad.</p><p>Legs. Relation of protarsomeres 36:14:9:7:17. Protarsomeres symmetrical. Protarsomere 1 ventrally with one distinct row of short suberect spines and two indistinct rows of shorter suberect spines from each side; protarsomere 2 and 3 ventrally with few short suberect spines; protarsomere 4 and 5 ventrally without spines. Meso- and metatarsomeres 1–2 ventrally with three rows suberect spines; meso- and metatarsomere 3 ventroapically with few spines; meso- and metatarsomeres 4 and 5 ventrally without spines. Orbicula with 6–8 radiating bristles 0.7–0.8 times longer than claw. Longest spur of mesotibia 0.8 times longer than mesotarsomere 1; longest spur of metatibia 0.7 times longer than metatarsomere 1. Tarsal claws symmetrical, gently bent apically, with small inner subapical tooth.</p><p>Wings. Forewing slightly infuscated with darker preapical spot; median vein M distinctly arched; crossvein cu- a oblique (Fig. 41). Hind wing regularly slightly infuscated, venation as in Fig. 42.</p><p>Metasoma. T1 dorsally 1.1 times its maximum width. S2 with two weak transverse furrows, not connected medially. S5 posteriorly with concavity on both sides from median line.</p><p>Sculpture. Posterior half of clypeus and frons with dense small punctures (Fig. 11). Clypeus anteriorly smooth and shine, with elongated smooth furrows and pits changing to dense small punctures (Figs 11, 12). Pronotum with weakly visible micropunctures. Disc of scutum and propodeum with dense and smaller then on frons punctures. Scutellum and metanotum with gentle small punctures. Metapostnotum shine with distinct transverse striae in anterior third. Propodeum matt, densely punctated (Fig. 13). Mesopleuron with fine very small punctures. T1–T4 semi polished, with fine punctures (Fig. 10). T5, S5 matt. S1–S4 with micropunctures and scattered pits. Legs matt.</p><p>Pubescence. Upper frons and vertex with few short white erect setae. Clypeus along transverse median line with suberect light brown setae of different lengths. Mandible with long light brown erect setae. Gena and propodeum laterally with scattered short pale setae. S2–S4 posteriorly with scattered longer pale erect setae. T5 and S5 with dense long pale suberect setae. Frons and mesosoma (except metapostnotum and propodeum) with grey micropubescence. Metapostnotum without pubescence. Propodeum with erect whitish micropubescence (Fig. 13). Metasoma with irregularly grey micropubescence.</p><p>Colour (Figs 8–14). Black. Scape, pedicel, F1–F5 ventrally brown. Frons along inner orbit and gena along outer orbit with yellow stripes. Clypeus antero-laterally with small yellow spots. Basal half of mandible yellowbrown with small yellow spot at base. Pronotum antero-laterally with small oval yellow spot; along posterior border with narrow yellow stripe. Disc of scutum postero-medially with small yellow spot. Discs of scutellum and metanotum yellow. Propodeum posteriorly with group of small yellow spots. Mesopleuron anteriorly with a small roundish yellow spot; postero-dorsally with group of very small yellow spots. Metapleuron posteriorly yellow. T1 subbasally with yellow spots; T2 baso-laterally with disconnected yellow spots; T3 baso-laterally with almost connected yellow stripes; T4 and T5 basally with yellow strip. Procoxa apically yellowish; meso- and metacoxa behind with small yellow spots. Profemur ventro-subapically, dorso-apically and protibia dorso-preapically with yellow strip. Legs abundantly red-brown.</p><p>MALE. Unknown.</p><p>Comparison. Female of new species is similar to that of E. minor Gussakovskij by having concavity along lateral margin of clypeus, but is easily distinguished by having propodeum with distinct dense punctures (without distinct punctures in E. minor) (Fig. 13 vs Fig. 16), shortened flagellomere (first flagellomere 5.0 times its width vs 5.2–5.9 times in E. minor), forewing vein cu-a distinctly arched (straight in E. minor) (Fig. 41 vs Figs 34, 38), forewing vein M strongly arched (weakly arched in E. minor) (Fig. 41, arrow vs Figs 34, 38), yellow spots on: face along inner orbit, gena along outer orbit, pronotum laterally and posteriorly, discs of scutum, scutellum and metanotum, propodeum posteriorly, T1–T4 basally, all coxae and profemur (yellow spots only on: face along inner orbit, pronotum laterally and posteriorly, T2 and T3 basally in E. minor) (Figs 8–14 vs Figs 3, 16).</p><p>Distribution. China (Yunnan).</p><p>Etymology. The specific name originates from the Greek pseudo - and the known species minor with reference to their similarity.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/9D50A226FF97FF805DB6F99FFEB7F823	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Loktionov, Valery M.;Lelej, Arkady S.;Xu, Zaifu	Loktionov, Valery M., Lelej, Arkady S., Xu, Zaifu (2017): Review of the genus Eopompilus Gussakovskij, 1932 (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) with the description of new species from China. Zootaxa 4277 (3): 413-426, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4277.3.6
