taxonID	type	description	language	source
748D3BAB577E5A1C848508F1BC686DC9.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Identifiable as members of the † Camelomecia clade by the bowed mandibles with elongate masticatory margins, projecting clypeus, and absence of clypeal chaetae, frontal carinae, and facial projections, as outlined in the key above. Both sexes specifically differentiated from † Camelomecia by: (1) the conspicuously-developed mandibular teeth on the masticatory margin (versus teeth present as mere crenulation or absent altogether); (2) fore wing 1 cu-a crossvein distant proximally from divergence of free M and Cu by at least one of its own lengths (the phrase " markedly prefurcal " is used to describe this condition throughout this work; versus 1 m-cu proximal to M + Cu split by less than one 1 m-cu length, or 1 m-cu usually at or distal to split, as observed in all known † Camelomecia and † Haidomyrmecinae, for example); and (3) crossvein 2 m-cu absent (versus 2 m-cu present or absent). Females further differentiated from those of † Camelomecia as follows: (4) occipital carina of female extending to hypostoma (versus not); (5) compound eyes of female massively enlarged, filling entire lateral portion of head in profile view and rendering malar space virtually absent (versus compound eyes smaller, malar space well-defined); (6) teeth of masticatory mandibular margins conspicuously developed (versus present as crenulation or absent altogether); (7) disc (main central region) of labrum in the female bearing massive, long, thick chaetae (versus such chaetae absent); (8) anterior clypeal margin bidentate medially (versus margin edentate); (9) notauli on mesoscutum absent (versus present); (10) fore femora powerfully enlarged (versus weak and thin); (11) protarsomeres I and II margined with an array of differentiated psammochaetae (versus such chaetae absent); (12) posterolateral corners of propodeum armed (versus denticles absent or present); (13) abdominal poststernite IV short relative to posttergite. Males, as so far known for both genera, are further differentiated from † Camelomecia in having: (14) eyes medially binocular, i. e., with clypeus nearly concave and compound eyes massively, medially bulging such that medial-most ommatidia of each eye are directed toward one another.	en	Boudinot, Brendon E., Perrichot, Vincent, Chaul, Julio C. M. (2020): † Camelosphecia gen. nov., lost ant-wasp intermediates from the mid-Cretaceous (Hymenoptera, Formicoidea). ZooKeys 1005: 21-55, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1005.57629, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1005.57629
748D3BAB577E5A1C848508F1BC686DC9.taxon	etymology	Etymology. The root of the generic name, camelo -, is made in reference to † Camelomecia, the camel-faced ants; the second part of the name, - sphecia emphasizes the waspiness of these intermediate formicoids.	en	Boudinot, Brendon E., Perrichot, Vincent, Chaul, Julio C. M. (2020): † Camelosphecia gen. nov., lost ant-wasp intermediates from the mid-Cretaceous (Hymenoptera, Formicoidea). ZooKeys 1005: 21-55, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1005.57629, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1005.57629
E8E0DFB8240A52FDB3A7BB607D563FF9.taxon	materials_examined	Additional material examined. Same as holotype [females: BALBuTJ- 36, BALBuTJ- 38, BALBuTJ- 40 all in Janovitz collection]	en	Boudinot, Brendon E., Perrichot, Vincent, Chaul, Julio C. M. (2020): † Camelosphecia gen. nov., lost ant-wasp intermediates from the mid-Cretaceous (Hymenoptera, Formicoidea). ZooKeys 1005: 21-55, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1005.57629, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1005.57629
E8E0DFB8240A52FDB3A7BB607D563FF9.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Recognizable as Formicoidea and † Camelosphecia as defined above. Distinguished from † C. venator by features listed in that species' diagnosis. In briefest, the most distinct features include massive compound eyes, huge and muscular profemora, and presence of psammochaetae on the protarsus.	en	Boudinot, Brendon E., Perrichot, Vincent, Chaul, Julio C. M. (2020): † Camelosphecia gen. nov., lost ant-wasp intermediates from the mid-Cretaceous (Hymenoptera, Formicoidea). ZooKeys 1005: 21-55, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1005.57629, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1005.57629
E8E0DFB8240A52FDB3A7BB607D563FF9.taxon	description	Measurements. Female. CL 0.76; HL 0.94; WH 1.08; CW 0.46; EL 0.41; MW 0.07; LW 0.06; A 1 L 0.21; A 2 L 0.11; A 3 L 0.22; PnW 0.66; PL 0.83; PnLm 1.05; MtW 0.66; MtL 0.41; MsW 0.37; MsL 0.32; WL 1.83; PtL 0.63.	en	Boudinot, Brendon E., Perrichot, Vincent, Chaul, Julio C. M. (2020): † Camelosphecia gen. nov., lost ant-wasp intermediates from the mid-Cretaceous (Hymenoptera, Formicoidea). ZooKeys 1005: 21-55, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1005.57629, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1005.57629
E8E0DFB8240A52FDB3A7BB607D563FF9.taxon	description	Description. Female. Head. Postgenal bridge elongate, thus head " prognathous ". Head posterior to clypeus strongly broadened (broader than long) and inflated, except for a pair of concavities lying over the posterolateral clypeal margin which accommodate the base of scapes. Mandibles cup-shaped, strongly bowed. Masticatory margin of mandibles with 13 teeth. Teeth, except the apical, truncate, gear-like; individual teeth short basally on masticatory margin and gradually increasing in length apically. Apical tooth (maybe apical and preapical) largest, pointed. Ventral surface of mandible without dense tuft of chaetae. Mandibles crossing apically, at full closure approximately half the masticatory margin would cross. Basolateral area of dorsal mandibular surface just beneath malar margin distinctly concave, contrasting to the remaining strongly convex, dome-shaped surface; the margin of this area just before meeting the cranium sinuous in profile view, appearing dentate. Labrum bilobed, its dorsum covered with ca. 24 long, stout chaetae with gently curved tips (chaetae somewhat shorter than 0.1 mm). Palps basally concealed by the labrum and mandibles, so that maxillary palpomeres total count is five or six and labial palpomeres are not visible. Maxillary palpomeres elongate. Clypeus having a basal section integrated with the cranium and an anteromedially projected over mandibles as a thin laminar platform, its maximum width ca. 0.4 x that of head. Clypeal platform having a pair of broad and low anterolateral lobes which curve into an anteromedial pair of close-set triangular teeth. In face view, considering the entire clypeus, the anterior clypeal margin bears two pairs of lobes and the medial pair of teeth, the lobes laterad corresponding to the actual anterolateral corners of the clypeus. Posterior to the platform, the remainder of the clypeus is rightly integrated into the cranium and confined to the anterior eighth of the head. The posterior margin of the clypeus is poorly marked medially, between the toruli, the margin slightly surpassing toruli anteriormost level, but not reaching their posteriormost level. Antennae. Torulus laterally directed; posteromedian portion of torular arch slightly enlarged and covering part of bulbus. Bulbus and bulbus neck coplanar and angled in relation to scape. Antennae 12 - merous, not clubbed. Longest antennomeres are I (scape) and III, these two being subequal in length. Antennomere II (pedicel) is small and slightly inflated. Antennomere IV longer than V. Antennomeres V-XI more-or-less similar in size and shape. Apical antennomere not much longer than previous. Antennomeres dorsoventrally compressed (could be a taphonomic artifact). Frontal carinae absent. Eyes enormous, not bulging, length ca. 2 x the width in the full view of the eye; in full-face view, eye length ca. 0.7 x the length of head discounting clypeal projection. In full-face view, medial margin of compound eyes weakly concave, although not conspicuously notched. Ocelli relatively small and positioned high on dorsum of head, the lateral pair almost reaching the vertexal margin in full-face view. Vertexal margin slightly convex. Lateral margins almost entirely occupied by the compound eyes, except for anterior portions, which converge until meeting the outer margin of mandibles. Posterolateral and lateral occipital margin carinate, the margin poorly delimited posteromedially and anteromedially. Ventral surface of head flat to gently concave, with a slightly raised longitudinal median section corresponding in location with the postgenal ridge. Postgenal ridge with a small indentation at its posterior limit. Small, simple, suberect to recurved setae on dorsum of head, except for longer ones originating on the anterior edge of the clypeus and on the mandibles. Antennomeres II-XII covered on dense pubescence. Mesosoma. Pronotum elongate, distinctly bell-shaped in dorsal view; posteriormost region transversely constricted. Pronotum without anterior fringe of setae which is observed in † Camelomecia; anterior margin of pronotum, however, with distinct " beading " or rim and sulcus which delimit the anteriormost region. In profile view, posterodorsal portion extended posteriorly as a lobe, with the lobe situated very close to the tegula (nearly contacting); posterior margin just below lobe apparently concave; posteroventral margin lobate, not extending medially posterior to fore coxae, as would be expected for Apoidea. Mesonotum (mesoscutum + mesoscutellum) length in dorsal view subequal to length of pronotum. Mesoscutum> 1.5 x broader than long, more-or-less oval in shape. Axillae small. Scutoscutellar sulcus distinct and cross-ribbed, but not particularly deep. Mesoscutellum slightly longer than wide, tapering posterad and with an arched posterior margin. Mesopleuron bulging; oblique mesopleural sulcus present as a thin and poorly-marked line in the upper half of the mesopleural area posteriorly, separating the upper mesopleural area (erstwhile " anepisternum ") from the lower mesopleural area (erstwhile " katepisternum "); lower mesopleural area ca. 4 x longer than upper mesopleural area. Propodeal spiracle large, protruding from the cuticle, its opening slit and crescent-shaped and posteriorly oriented; spiracle positioned on the upper anterior region of the lateropropodeal surface. Lower metapleural area thin, delimited posteroventrally by carina. Upper metapleural area triangular, its margins approximately the same size. A small metanotal spiracle is apparently seen on the upper anterior corner of the left metapleural area. Propodeum with a subquadrate lamellate projection developed on the lower posterolateral mesosomal corner, projecting over the bases of the metacoxa and metasomal petiole. The anterior and posterior angles of the projection are sharply defined, and its dorsal surface is concave. Propodeum dorsal and declivous faces separated from the lateral face by a pair of ridges that are poorly marked anteriorly and strongly marked posteriorly, each reaching the metapleuropropodeal lamellate projection posteriorly; in the holotype, it appears that a pair of indentations on the upper portion of the propodeal ridges make the propodeum angled in profile view (at least on the left side of the specimen), whereas in the non-type specimens, these carinae toothed at the posterodorsal angle. Metapleural gland orifice absent, and there is no trace of a metapleural gland reservoir (bulla). Legs. Procoxa and profemur hypertrophied. Protibia bearing distally next to calcar a short, robust, spike-shaped chaeta. Calcar thin, curved, with bifid tip, without a distinct brush along its length, but having pubescence-like projections. Probasitarsal notch only gently concave, bearing the probasitarsal comb, but without any chaetae next to it. Probasitarsus and protarsomere II forming a specialized structure consisting of long, curved, somewhat bluntly tipped, psammochaetae. Probasitarsus anterior surface having two of such specialized sensilla trichodea apically, projecting over protarsomere II and protarsomere II bearing three of such sensilla trichodea on its anterior surface. The five psammochaetae are very close together and probably form a digging apparatus in analogy to extant fossorial Aculeata. In addition to the specialized chaetae, a pair of spike-shaped chaetae is also present apically on the posterior surface of probasitarsus as well as a tiny, peg-like chaeta apicomedially on the posterior surface. Protarsomere II has additionally a pair of small, spike-shaped chaetae on its posterior apical edge and an apicomedian, enlarged, blister-like, lobate chaeta on the posterior surface. Protarsomere II is short and slightly offset from the long axis of the probasitarsus. Protarsomeres III and IV each bearing two pairs of small, spike-shaped chaetae apicolaterally and with a lobate apicomedial chaeta in between them on the posterior surface, similar in shape but not as enlarged as that on protarsomere II. Spike-shaped chaetae and lobate chaeta apparently absent on protarsomere V. Pretarsal claws of proleg robust and curved, armed with a pair of teeth on their inner margins. Arolium slightly longer than half the length of claws. Mid and hind legs without any hypertrophied segment, although metatibiae apically clavate. Meso- and metatarsomeres I-IV similar in structure to protarsomeres III and IV, except for the apicomedian chaeta, which is not lobate and apparently rigid. These chaetae are also longer and more conspicuous on the mesotarsus than on the metatarsus. Paired mesotibial spurs present; spurs long and simple. Metatibial spurs not preserved, but from non-type material can be described as a pair of long and simple spurs similar but slightly longer than that on mesotibia. Metasoma. In total, three metasomal segments of holotype preserved, corresponding to abdominal segments II-IV. Petiole (abdominal II) massive in dorsal view; posttergite II anteriorly broad (approximately as broad as the width at midlength of the mesoscutellum), broadly inserting into the lower propodeal declivous surface (propodeal foramen wide). Laterotergite of segment II well-defined and dorsoventrally broad. Posttergite II mildly constricted posteriorly and consequently, constriction between pre- and posttergite III also not strong, therefore, the abdominal segment II has only mild petiolation. Poststernite II V-shaped in ventral view, its lateral margins carinate (could be a taphonomic artifact), tapering anteriorly until meeting and forming a small subpetiolar process (in profile largely obliterated by the metacoxae). Entire posttergite II and anterior portion of posttergite III laterally carinated. Anterior process on poststernite III, the prora, subrectangular; its anterior angle round and the posterior angle pointy and inclined ventrally. Abdominal segment IV, as determined from non-type specimens, with slight constriction corresponding to transverse sulci which delimit the pre- and post-sclerites of the tergum and sternum; lateral margins of tergum and sternum IV aligned for their whole length. Sclerites of abdominal segments V, VI, and VII telescoped internally, their tergal margins apparently overlap the sterna laterally. Wing venation. (Determined from non-type specimens.) Costal vein (C), subcostal-radial-radial-sector complex vein (Sc + R + Rs), and first free abscissa of the Radius (Rf 1) present and tubular, enclosing costal cell. Pterostigma well-developed, situated near the apical third of the fore wing, but exact position difficult to ascertain. Rf distal to pterostigma present, meeting the free Radial Sector (Rsf) and enclosing third radial cell (3 R 1, or " first marginal cell ", 1 MC). Cell 3 R 1 ca. 4 x as long proximodistally as wide anteroposteriorly; apex of cell rounded and considerably distant from apex of wing. The first free abscissa of the Radial Sector (Rsf 1) splitting from Sc + R + Rs proximal to the pterostigma, but separated by ca. 1 of its lengths; Rsf 1 directed posterobasally. The mediocubital complex vein (M + Cu) present; free Media (Mf) and Cubitus (Cuf) splitting near midlength of wing. First free abscissa of Media (Mf 1) short, with a length subequal to that of the first cubitoanal crossvein (1 cu-a). Rsf 1 and (Mf 1) meeting at a very oblique angle, nearly parallel; Radial-Sector-Media composite abscissa (Rs + M) tubular, directed posterodistally, and nearly orthogonal to main axis of Rsf 1 and Mf 1; Rs + M length subequal to that of Rsf 1; split of Rs and M distal to anterior juncture of first mediocubital crossvein (1 m-cu), thus Rs + M comprising two abscissae (Rs + M 1, Rs + M 2), and 1 m-cu " prefurcal " in general aculeate terminology. 1 m-cu short, subequal in length to Mf 1. Rsf immediately distal to split of Rs + M, with apex of kink marked by flexion line, thus Rsf 2 and Rsf 3 defined; flexion line spectral, thus first radiosectoral crossvein (1 r-rs) " absent ". Second radiosectoral crossvein (2 r-rs) tubular, situated at approximately pterostigma midlength, directed slightly posterodistally, and short (length subequal to Mf 1, 1 cu-a). Rsf distal to 2 r-rs divided into two remaining abscissae (Rsf 4, Rsf 5) by second sectoriomedial crossvein (2 rs-m) [note: 1 rs-m always absent in Hymenoptera due to fusion of Rsf and Mf which forms Rs + M]; Rsf 4 longer than 2 r-rs but shorter than Rf 1, 2 rs-m. Mf, distal to Rs + M, straight and divided into two abscissae by 2 rs-m (Mf 2, Mf 3); Mf 2 longer than Rs + M but shorter than Rsf 5; Mf 3 tubular but becoming spectral well before apex of wing. Two " submarginal cells " enclosed by tubular abscissae; third " submarginal cell " undefined due to absence of third sectoriomedial crossvein (3 rs-m). First medial cell (1 M, or " discal cell 1 ") rhomboidal, ca. 4 x as long proximodistally as wide anteroposteriorly; Mf 1 and 1 m-cu parallel; Rs + M and first free cubital abscissa (Cuf 1) parallel. Second medial cell (2 M, or " discal cell 2 ") undefined due to absence of the second mediocubital crossvein (2 m-cu). The second free cubital abscissa (Cuf 2) evenly and shallowly curved until its apex is directed posteriorly; Cuf 2 apparently reaching first anal vein (1 A); cubitus distal to Cuf nebulous to spectral and curved. 1 cu-a situated considerably proximad M + Cu split, being distant by at least twice its length, hence 1 cu-a " very prefurcal ". 1 A tubular, although full extend uncertain. Hind wing venation not evaluated due to lack of appropriate preserved views. Preservation. Holotype. The body parts of the holotype that have suffered considerable distortion inside the amber matrix are the left procoxa, left mesopleuron and left mesocoxa, left and right metapleura and metacoxae, and the propodeum. Propodeal and metathoracic regions are considerably distorted, so much so that it is impossible to determine on which side the morphology has been better preserved. For example, on the right side, the propodeal spiracle is positioned at the same level of the mesocoxa in an anteroposterior axis, and the distance between the spiracle and the metapleural posteroventral corner is 0.43 mm. On the left side, it is positioned slightly anterior to the mesocoxa level and the distance between it and the metapleural corner is 0.32 mm. Missing body parts are: left protarsus; left mesotibia and mesotarsus; left metafemur, metatibia, and metabasitarsus; part of the right mesofemur and mesotibia, right metafemur, metatibia and metatarsus; entire abdominal segments IV-VII and part of abdominal segments II and III. Syninclusions. One nematoceran fly, which remains in the same amber piece with the holotype. Two staphylinid beetles, which were separated from the holotype in other amber pieces after the preparation (JCCamb 00051 and JCCamb 00052, both in JCMC).	en	Boudinot, Brendon E., Perrichot, Vincent, Chaul, Julio C. M. (2020): † Camelosphecia gen. nov., lost ant-wasp intermediates from the mid-Cretaceous (Hymenoptera, Formicoidea). ZooKeys 1005: 21-55, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1005.57629, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1005.57629
E8E0DFB8240A52FDB3A7BB607D563FF9.taxon	etymology	Etymology. The specific epithet emphasizes the digging adaptations of the species; the name is treated as a noun in apposition. Comments. Four additional specimens of † Camelosphecia, three females (Fig. 15) and one male (Fig. 16), were studied based on images only. Among the females, two specimens (BALBuTJ _ 36 and BALBuTJ _ 40) are probably conspecifics to † C. fossor and one of them (BALBuTJ _ 38) probably represents another species. BALBuTJ _ 36 (Fig. 15 A) is particularly interesting for its exceptional preservation. No significant differences were found between † C. fossor holotype and BALBuTJ _ 36, and the fossil was used to complete the description of † C. fossor, as most of the metasoma of the holotype was missing and its propodeum very distorted. BALBuTJ _ 40 (Fig. 15 C) is a fossil difficult to interpret for containing a lot of debris and internal fractures around the inclusion. We doubtfully consider it conspecific to † C. fossor. A more thorough examination of the specimen can change this interpretation. BALBuTJ _ 38 almost certainly is a different species which we do not describe here. It differs from † C. fossor for having abundant thick, long and flexuous setae dorsally on mesosoma; unarmed, block-like propodeum; and an even thicker profemur.	en	Boudinot, Brendon E., Perrichot, Vincent, Chaul, Julio C. M. (2020): † Camelosphecia gen. nov., lost ant-wasp intermediates from the mid-Cretaceous (Hymenoptera, Formicoidea). ZooKeys 1005: 21-55, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1005.57629, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1005.57629
AE4ECCCFEB85560E807CD139C4AC4C00.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Identifiable as Formicoidea based on the definition given for the superfamily above. Associated with † Camelosphecia females by the multidentate mandibles, the shape of the clypeus, and the markedly prefurcal 1 cu-a. † Camelosphecia venator differs substantially from † C. fossor and is undoubtedly a new species based on the following features: (1) " marginal cell " very short, area approximately equal to that of pterostigma; (2) 1 m-cu " postfurcal ", or joining Mf distal to split of Rs + M; (3) 2 r-rs joining Rsf proximal to 2 r-rs; (4) " discal cell " wider; (5) " subdiscal cell " (enclosed by Cu, A, and 1 cu-a) shorter; (6) petiolar node very well-defined, hump-like; and (7) prora (anteroventral keel of abdominal sternum III) shelf-like, strongly projecting. The male-based species differs from † C. fossor and † C. cf. fossor (BALBuTJ _ 38) by additional features which are expected due to sexual dimorphism, including having a distinct eye shape, shorter pronotum, twig-like profemora, and lack of the psammochaetae.	en	Boudinot, Brendon E., Perrichot, Vincent, Chaul, Julio C. M. (2020): † Camelosphecia gen. nov., lost ant-wasp intermediates from the mid-Cretaceous (Hymenoptera, Formicoidea). ZooKeys 1005: 21-55, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1005.57629, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1005.57629
AE4ECCCFEB85560E807CD139C4AC4C00.taxon	description	Measurements. Male. CL 0.98; VBL 0.21; HL 1.34; EL 0.58; LW 0.16; A 1 L 0.20; A 2 L 0.09; A 3 L 0.39; PnL 0.48; PnLm 0.68; WL 1.76; WLa 1.62; PtL 0.42. (Note: due to preservation and orientation, could not measure HW, CW, MW, PnW, MtW, MtL, MsW, and MsL.)	en	Boudinot, Brendon E., Perrichot, Vincent, Chaul, Julio C. M. (2020): † Camelosphecia gen. nov., lost ant-wasp intermediates from the mid-Cretaceous (Hymenoptera, Formicoidea). ZooKeys 1005: 21-55, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1005.57629, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1005.57629
AE4ECCCFEB85560E807CD139C4AC4C00.taxon	description	Description. Male. Head. Cranium " male-like " for Formicoidea, particularly stem Formicidae and taxa of the poneriine clade (i. e., the " poneroids " of Bolton 2003): Cranium more-or-less hypognathous despite elongate postgenal bridge; compound eyes bulging, medially emarginate; vertex (bearing ocelli) produced dorsally. Features differing from expectation: Mandibles distinctly multidentate, with eleven teeth as determined from the holotype; masticatory mandibular margin elongate; mandibles bowed, as observed in the female; cranial mandibular condyle small; clypeus reduced, concave, reminiscent of male Ponerini; compound eyes " binocular " in that anterior medialmost ommatidia with direct line of sight across the clypeus; antennal toruli close-set and dorsally directed (distinct from female); ocelli hypertrophied (suggesting nocturnal flight); occipital carina incomplete, possibly encircling occipital foramen but definitely not extending to mandibular base. Antenna 13 - merous. Scape short, ca. 3 - 4 x as long as broad. Main body of pedicel approximately as broad as long. Flagellum elongate, each flagellomere several times longer than broad. Mesosoma. Pronotum short but muscular, with distinct bulge in profile view between " neck " and posterior " collar "; lateral face of mesopleuron broadly and deeply concave; concavity oriented dorsoventrally, apparently for reception of leg when fore leg completely retracted up to body; pronotum posterodorsally produced as lobe, lobe contacting fore wing tegulum; pronotum not forming ring posterior to fore coxae. Mesoscutum with deep and convergent notauli. Oblique mesopleural sulcus of mesopectus extending completely from anterior (" epicnemial ") margin to posterior (" mesepimeral ") margin. Mesothorax distinct laterally. Propodeum with dorsal and posterior faces curving into one another in profile view, apparently without distinct angular marking; posterolateral portion of propodeum, i. e., the area corresponding to the propodeal lobe, produced posteriorly, but not apparently in subrectangular form. Propodeal spiracle apparently situated high and anterior on segment, subtending metapleuron. Legs. Legs, overall, thin and without notable setal armament. Long setae not discernible. Protibial calcar apparently bifurcate apically. Mesotibia apparently with two ventroapical spurs, the anterior of which is thick compared to a seta and is barbirulate (sensu Bolton 2003). Metatibial spurs and tarsi not preserved in holotype. Metasoma. Abdominal segment II with distinct petiolar node which is strong and convex; anterolateral corners carinate; form of subpetiolar process uncertain. Helcium (articulatory portion of abdominal segment II) well-defined, axial (situated at approximately segment midheight), and broad dorsoventrally and lateromedially. Prora (keel of abdominal sternum II) robust and triangular in profile view. Wing venation. Veins tubular as in female † Camelosphecia. Differing as follows: 1 Rsf situated ca. 2 x its length from pterostigma, nearly perpendicular to proximodistal length of wing; juncture of 1 Rsf and Mf 1 more distinctly angular; 1 m-cu " postfurcal ", i. e., joining M distal to split of Rs + M; 2 r-rs somewhat more proximal; " marginal cell " small, curve of posterior margin (as defined by Rsf) parallel to pterostigma; 2 rs-m " prefurcal ", with anterior juncture proximal to 2 r-rs; tubular portion of Mf distal to 2 r-rs very short; " discal cell " pentagonal and less than 1.5 x as long proximodistally as broad anteroposteriorly; 1 cu-a joining M + Cu ca. 1 x of its lengths proximal to split of Rs + M. Preservation. Amber matrix filled with uniformly distributed dark spheres. Metasoma from posterior portion of abdominal segment III, left meso- and meta-femora and distal segments, and right metatarsus removed due to specimen preparation. Hind wings not easily visible due to taphonomy. Specimen does not appear dehydrated or otherwise compressed or distorted.	en	Boudinot, Brendon E., Perrichot, Vincent, Chaul, Julio C. M. (2020): † Camelosphecia gen. nov., lost ant-wasp intermediates from the mid-Cretaceous (Hymenoptera, Formicoidea). ZooKeys 1005: 21-55, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1005.57629, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1005.57629
AE4ECCCFEB85560E807CD139C4AC4C00.taxon	etymology	Etymology. The specific epithet suggests the likely predatory habits of the unknown female, while also highlighting the visual acuity of the male probably required for mate-seeking.	en	Boudinot, Brendon E., Perrichot, Vincent, Chaul, Julio C. M. (2020): † Camelosphecia gen. nov., lost ant-wasp intermediates from the mid-Cretaceous (Hymenoptera, Formicoidea). ZooKeys 1005: 21-55, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1005.57629, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1005.57629
