identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
9C0887BE4453476BB4C77CC0FC81FCA2.text	9C0887BE4453476BB4C77CC0FC81FCA2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Hylcalosia Fischer 1967	<div><p>Genus Hylcalosia Fischer, 1967</p><p>Holcalysia Cameron, 1910: 6 (preoccupied, not Holcalysia Cameron, 1905: 268).</p><p>Hylcalosia Fischer, 1967: 125; Shenefelt, 1974: 993; van Achterberg, 1983: 82; Belokobylskij, 1992: 144; 1998: 297; Chen &amp; Wu, 1994: 85; Fischer, 2008: 718; Yu et al., 2012; Zheng et al., 2012: 454.</p><p>Type species: Holcalysia ruficeps Cameron, 1910, by monotypy.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/9C0887BE4453476BB4C77CC0FC81FCA2	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A. (2015): The genus Hylcalosia Fischer, 1967 (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Alysiinae) of the Russian Far East. Zootaxa 4040 (5): 530-542, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4040.5.2
9C0887BE4453476FB4C77DF2FBE2FF31.text	9C0887BE4453476FB4C77DF2FBE2FF31.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Hylcalosia hymaenei Belokobylskij 1992	<div><p>Hylcalosia hymaenei Belokobylskij, 1992</p><p>(Figs 1 –14)</p><p>Hylcalosia hymaenei Belokobylskij, 1992: 146; 1998: 298; Fischer, 2008: 722; Yu et al., 2012; Zheng et al., 2012: 455.</p><p>Material examined. Russia. Primorskiy Territory: 2 females (holotype and paratype), “Primorskiy kray, Spassk[- Dal’niy], les, 21–23 VII 1987, G. Belokobylskaya” (ZISP); 1 female (paratype), 2 males, same label, but with “ 19.07.1987 ” (ZISP); 2 females (paratypes), same label, but with “ 23.07.1987 ” (ZISP); 1 female (paratype), same label, but with “7.07.1990” (ZISP); 1 male, same label, but “ 30.07.1990 ” (ZISP); 2 females (paratypes), same label, but with “lesopolosy, 14.VII.1987 ” (ZISP); 1 female (paratype), “Primorskiy kray, Spassk[-Dal’niy], les, polyany, 19.07.1991, Belokobylskij” (ZISP); 1 female (paratype), same label, but with “ 27.07.1991 ” (ZISP); 1 female (paratype), same label, but with “les, opushka, 10.07.1991 ” (ZISP); 1 female (paratype), same label, but with “les, opushki, polyany, 25.07.1991 ” (ZISP); 1 female, same label, but with “les, opushki, 9– 11.07.1995 ” (ZISP); 1 female, same label, but with “les, polyany, kustarnik, 10– 12.07.1995 ” (ZISP); 2 females, " Russia: Primorskiy kray, Spassk-Dal'niy, forest, glads, 22.VII.2010, Belokobylskij" (ZISP); 1 female, “Primorskiy kray, 20 km YuV Spassk[-Dal'niy], les, opushki, 13.07.1995, S. Belokobylskij” (ZISP); 1 female, “ Russia: Primorskiy kray, 20 km NW Spassk-Dal'niy, 6.VII.2010, wet meadow, S. Belokobylskij” (ZISP); 1 female (paratype), “Prim.[orskiy] kr.[ay], Chernigovskiy r-n, 1.3, 18.07.[19]84, Arefin, Ivliev” (ZISP); 1 female (paratype), same label, but with “1.2, 25.07.[19]84” (ZISP); 1 female (paratype), same label, but with “1.5, 3.08.[19]84” (ZISP); 1 female, same label, but with “2.1b, 12.08.[19]84” (ZISP); 1 female (paratype), “Prim.[orskiy] kr.[ay], Chernig[ovskiy] r-n, s. Dmitrievka, ambrosia, koshenie 4, 11.07.[19]88, Esipenko” (ZISP); 1 female, 1 male, “Primorie, Merkushevka, 15 km V Dmitrievki, les, polyany, 21.07.1991, Belokobylskij”; 2 females, “Primorskiy kray, 5 km Z Anisimovki, les, polyany, 6–9.08.1993, Belokobylskij” (ZISP); 1 female, “Primorskiy kray, 15 km SZ Partizanska, les, 14 VII 1979, Belokobylskij” (ZISP); 1 female, “Primorie, zap. Kedrovaya pad’, 14.7.[19]75, Ryabukhin” (ZISP). Evreyskaya Autonomous Province: 2 females, “ Rossiya: Evreyskaya AO, Chr[ebet]. Malyi Khingan, Radde, bereg r.[eki] Amur, les, opushki, 12– 15.07.2003, S. Belokobylskij” (ZISP). Amur Province: 3 females, “ Rossiya: Amurskaya oblast', 40 km YuZ Svobodnogo, smesh.[annyi] les, opushki, 27– 29.07.2003, S. Belokobylskij” (ZISP); 3 females, “ Rossiya: Amurskaya oblast', 25 km S Svobodnogo, Chernovka, r.[eka] B.[ol'shaya] Pera, opushki, smesh.[annyi] les, 31.07—2.08.2003, S. Belokobylskij” (ZISP).</p><p>Redescription. Female. Body length 2.2–3.0 mm; fore wing length 2.4–3.1 mm.</p><p>Head 1.6–1.7 × wider than median length, 1.45–1.55 × wider than maximum length, 1.40–1.55 × wider than mesoscutum. Vertex without median longitudinal furrow, but with dark median line. Head behind eyes (dorsal view) weakly convex in anterior half and distinctly roundly narrowed in posterior half. Transverse diameter of eye (dorsal view) 1.3–1.6 × length of temple (1.4–1.7 × if measured in a straight line). Ocelli arranged in triangle with base 1.2–1.4 × longer than its sides, with distinct short furrow between posterior ocelli. POL 1.0–1.2 × OD, 0.4–0.5 × OOL. Eyes with short and rather sparse setae, subround, about 1.1 × as high as broad. Face width 1.2–1.4 × height of eye, 2.2–2.6 × median height of face. Clypeus subtriangular, protruding forward, width of clypeus 1.2–1.4 × its median width, 0.3–0.4 × width of face. Mandible distinctly widened towards subapex, its median length 1.5– 1.8 × distal width. Teeth of mandible as on Fig. 5.</p><p>FIGURES 10–14. Hylcalosia hymenaei Belokobylskij (female; 10–12, 14— paratype; 13—specimen from Amur Province). 10. Fore and hind wings. 11. Propodeum and first metasomal tergite, dorsal view. 12, 13. Metasoma, dorsal view. 14. Apical margin of third metasomal tergite, dorsal view.</p><p>Antennae rather slender, filiform, 40-segmented, 1.7 × longer than body. Scape 1.3–1.5 × longer than its maximum width. First flagellar segment widest, 1.7–2.2 × longer than its maximum width, 0.75–0.80 × as long as second segment; second segment 3.1–3.6 × longer than apical width. Penultimate segment 2.6 × longer than its maximum width, 0.8 × as long as first flagellar segment, 0.75 × as long as apical segment; the latter distinctly pointed apically.</p><p>Mesosoma 1.4–1.5 × longer than height. Pronotum with deep and wide pronope. Mesoscutum 0.8–0.9 × as long as maximum width, in posterior 0.5 with deep and long median longitudinal smooth furrow. Notauli deep, wide, crenulate, developed in anterior half (very rarely in anterior 0.4) of mesoscutum, completely absent in posterior half. Prescutellar depression deep, sparsely rugose or rugulose, mainly smooth, with high median and sometimes two low lateral carinae 0.3–0.4 × as long as scutellum. Scutellum weakly convex, without lateral carinae. Metanotum with median longitudinal carina (dorsal view) transformed to low flange (lateral view).</p><p>Sternaulus (precoxal sulcus) wide, deep, entirely coarsely rugose-reticulate, fused anteriorly with lower margin of subalar depression, sometimes (in large specimens) with narrow and shallow crenulate furrow from end of sternaulus till middle coxa. Subalar depression shallow, rather wide, weakly or distinctly rugose-reticulate. Metapleural flange wide and short. Propodeal spiracles small and round.</p><p>Wings. Fore wing 2.3–2.8 × longer than wide. Pterostigma short and rather narrow, 3.5–4.0 × longer than its maximum width. Radial cell not shortened, metacarp 1.5–1.6 × longer than pterostigma. Radial vein arising distinctly behind middle of pterostigma, from its 0.60–0.65. Inner anterior margin of pterostigma 1.5–1.7 × longer than its inner posterior margin. Second radial abscissa 2.6–3.3 × longer than first abscissa, 0.25–0.30 × as long as third abscissa, 0.7–0.8 × as long as first radiomedial vein. Second radiomedial cell 2.4–2.7 × longer than wide, 1.7– 2.0 × longer than brachial cell. Recurrent vein postfurcal, but sometimes only weakly. Recurrent and basal veins convergent posteriorly. Nervulus postfurcal, distance between nervulus and basal vein 0.3–0.4 × nervulus length, very rarely almost interstitial. Brachial cell closed apically. Parallel vein arising almost from or sometimes weakly behind middle (from posterior 0.4) of apical margin of brachial cell. Hind wing 4.7–5.6 × longer than its maximum width. First costal abscissa about 0.8 × as long as second abscissa. First abscissa of mediocubital vein 1.4–2.0 × longer than second abscissa. Recurrent vein antefurcal or interstitial.</p><p>Legs. Hind femur 4.5–4.8 (rarely 5.0–5.1) × longer than its maximum width. Hind tarsus as long as hind tibia. Hind basitarsus 0.6–0.7 × as long as second-fifth segments combined. Second segment of hind tarsus 0.50–0.55 × as long as basitarsus, 1.4–1.7 × longer than fifth segment (without pretarsus).</p><p>Metasoma usually more or less distinctly widened till apex of second tergite, then evenly narrowed, apical segments not protruding behind third tergite; metasoma 1.7–2.1 × longer than its maximum width, about 0.9 × as long as head and mesosoma combined. First tergite distinctly and almost linearly or weakly roundly widened from base to apex, with wide dorsope, with distinct dorsal carinae usually fused before basal half or rarely only closely convergent here. Length of first tergite 0.95–1.10 × its apical width; apical width 2.2–2.4 × its basal width. Median length of second tergite 0.85–1.00 × its basal width, 0.7–0.9 × its maximum posterior width, 1.4–1.7 × length of third tergite. Second suture shallow or very shallow and crenulate. Second and third tergites with separated laterotergites, its combined length 1.1–1.3 × maximum width. Ovipositor sheath slender, 1.00–1.25 × as long as metasoma, 1.1–1.4 × longer than mesosoma, 0.4–0.5 × as long as fore wing.</p><p>Sculpture and pubescence. Vertex and temple smooth; frons mainly smooth, but finely and densely reticulatepunctate in anterolateral part or in anterior third. Face and clypeus entirely densely and coarsely rugose-reticulate with granulation partly, striate laterally. Mesoscutum and scutellum entirely smooth, mesoscutum rugose laterally and anteriorly along its margins, more or less punctate anteriorly on median lobe. Mesopleuron mainly smooth. Propodeum entirely coarsely and densely rugose-reticulate, sometimes with more or less completely delineated narrow areola, with distinct carina in mediobasal 0.2–0.3. First tergite entirely almost linearly and rather sparsely coarsely striate with rugulosity between striae, weakly reticulate and sometimes with curved striation in mediobasal triangle at least in its anterior half. Second tergite rather sparsely and coarsely striate with reticulation between striae, rarely striae oblique; third tergite almost entirely, curvedly and rather coarsely or sometimes rather finely striate with reticulation between striae, smooth on very narrow posterior margin and laterally. Rarely second and third tergites and as exception first tergite medially finely rugulose-reticulate to smooth on narrow longitudinal stripe. Vertex sparsely setose, medially or medioanteriorly usually glabrous. Mesosoma mainly glabrous, with dense and rather long setae anteriorly, with sparse and long setae along notauli and laterally.</p><p>Colour. Head brownish yellow or light reddish brown, rarely dorsally infuscate. Mesosoma reddish brown to (rarely) dark reddish brown, sometimes partly (usually mesopleuron) almost black, propodeum usually light reddish brown, prothorax brownish yellow or light reddish brown. Metasoma light reddish brown, third tergite entirely, mainly or at least in apical third dark reddish brown to black. Antenna mainly dark reddish brown to black, two or several basal segments brownish yellow or light reddish brown, several basal flagellar segments usually reddish brown. Palpi yellow or pale yellow. Tegula light brown to almost yellow. Legs yellow to brownish yellow, hind tibia (at least in posterior half) and hind tarsus (rarely only basitarsus) brown, hind tibia basally yellow. Fore wing almost hyaline; veins brown to dark brown. Pterostigma dark brown, pale basally and apically.</p><p>Male. Body length 2.5–2.7 mm; fore wing length 2.5–2.9 mm. Antenna 39-segmented, about 2.0 × longer than body. Pterostigma weakly thickened. Metasoma narrow, 2.3–2.5 × longer than its maximum width, its apical segments weakly protruding behind third tergite. Length of first tergite 1.1–1.2 × its apical width, its dorsal carinae sometimes not fused. Sometimes mesosoma mainly dark. Otherwise similar to female.</p><p>Distribution. Russia: Primorskiy Territory, *Evreyskaya Autonomous Province, *Amur Province. Comparative diagnosis. This species is very similar to H. sutchanica Belokobylskij, 1992; the differences between these species are listed after redescription of the last species and in the key.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/9C0887BE4453476FB4C77DF2FBE2FF31	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A. (2015): The genus Hylcalosia Fischer, 1967 (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Alysiinae) of the Russian Far East. Zootaxa 4040 (5): 530-542, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4040.5.2
9C0887BE44574762B4C77F0FFF54FED5.text	9C0887BE44574762B4C77F0FFF54FED5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Hylcalosia livadiae	<div><p>Hylcalosia livadiae sp. nov</p><p>(Figs 15–28)</p><p>Type material. Holotype: female, “ Russia: Primorskiy kray, Livadiya, 15 km SW Nakhodka, forest, glades, 2.VIII.2013, Belokobylskij” (ZISP).</p><p>Description. Female. Body length 6.0 mm; fore wing length 5.6 mm.</p><p>Head 1.5 × wider than median length, 1.3 × wider than maximum length, 1.4 × wider than mesoscutum. Vertex without median longitudinal furrow. Head behind eyes (dorsal view) weakly widened in anterior half and distinctly roundly narrowed in posterior half. Transverse diameter of eye (dorsal view) 1.3 × length of temple (1.1 × if measured in a straight line). Ocelli arranged in triangle with base 1.25 × longer than its sides, with distinct narrow short and finely crenulate furrow between posterior ocelli. POL 0.75 × OD, 0.25 × OOL. Eyes with short and sparse setae, subround, 1.1 × as high as broad. Face width 1.65 × height of eye, 3.0 × median height of face. Clypeus subtriangular, protruding forward, width of clypeus 1.2 × its median width, 0.3 × width of face. Mandible widened towards subapex, its median length 1.7 × distal width. Teeth of mandible as on Fig. 20.</p><p>Antennae rather slender, almost filiform, more than 49-segmented, more than 1.3 × longer than body (apical segments missing). Scape weakly flattened, 1.25 × longer than its maximum width. First flagellar segment widest, 1.8 × longer than its maximum width, 0.8 × as long as second segment; second segment 3.2 × longer than apical width. Subapical segments 1.8 × longer than their maximum width.</p><p>Mesosoma 1.7 × longer than height. Pronotum with deep and wide pronope. Mesoscutum 0.9 × as long as maximum width, with deep wide median longitudinal and sparsely crenulate furrow in posterior 0.7. Notauli deep, wide, crenulate, but smooth posteriorly, developed almost entirely, but shallow posteriorly, fused with median furrow in posterior 0.3. Prescutellar depression deep, densely and coarsely rugose, with low median carina, 0.3 × as long as scutellum. Scutellum weakly convex, without lateral carinae. Metanotum with low median longitudinal carina (dorsal view) not transformed to flange (lateral view). Sternaulus (precoxal sulcus) rather wide, deep, entirely coarsely rugose-reticulate, almost fused anteriorly with lower margin of subalar depression. Subalar depression rather deep, wide, coarsely rugose-reticulate. Metapleural flange wide and long. Propodeal spiracles small and round.</p><p>Wings. Fore wing 2.9 × longer than wide. Pterostigma long and narrow, 4.8 × longer than its maximum width. Radial cell not shortened, metacarp 1.25 × longer than pterostigma. Radial vein arising distinctly behind middle of pterostigma, from its 0.7. Inner anterior margin of pterostigma almost 2.0 × longer than its inner posterior margin. Second radial abscissa 2.1 × longer than first abscissa, 0.3 × as long as the curved third abscissa, 0.6 × as long as first radiomedial vein. Second radiomedial cell 3.3 × longer than wide, 1.8 × longer than brachial cell. Recurrent vein weakly postfurcal. Recurrent and basal veins subparallel. Nervulus weakly postfurcal, distance between basal vein and nervulus 0.3 × nervulus length. Brachial cell widened towards apex. Parallel vein arising from posterior 0.4 of apical margin of brachial cell. Hind wing 4.7 × longer than its maximum width. First costal abscissa 0.78 × as long as second abscissa. First abscissa of mediocubital vein 2.0 × longer than second abscissa. Recurrent vein weakly postfurcal.</p><p>Legs. Hind femur 4.8 × longer than its maximum width. Hind tarsus 1.1 × longer than hind tibia. Hind basitarsus 0.8 × as long as second-fifth segments combined. Second segment of hind tarsus 0.4 × as long as basitarsus, 1.6 × longer than fifth segment (without pretarsus).</p><p>Metasoma weakly widened till apex of second tergite, then weakly narrowed, apical segments not protruding behind third tergite; metasoma 2.1 × longer than its maximum width, 0.9 × as long as head and mesosoma combined. First tergite distinctly and almost linearly widened from base to apex, with wide dorsope, with high and fused in basal 0.4 dorsal carinae. Length of first tergite equal to its apical width; apical width 2.3 × its basal width. Median length of second tergite 0.8 × basal width, 0.7 × its maximum posterior width, almost equal to length of third tergite. Second suture distinct, narrow and crenulate. Third tergite serratulate along apical margin. Second and third tergites with separated laterotergites. Ovipositor sheath slender, 1.25 × longer than metasoma, 1.4 × longer than mesosoma, 0.6 × as long as fore wing.</p><p>Sculpture and pubescence. Vertex and temple smooth; frons mainly smooth, rugulose near antennal sockets and densely punctate laterally. Face entirely densely and coarsely rugose-reticulate with striation laterally; clypeus entirely densely and finely reticulate-punctate. Mesoscutum smooth, densely punctate anteriorly, crenulate laterally. Scutellum entirely smooth. Mesopleuron mainly smooth. Propodeum entirely coarsely and densely rugose-areolate, weakly sculptured basally, without transverse striation, with areola unclear delineated by undulate carinae, with distinct carina in mediobasal 0.3. First to third tergites entirely coarsely and densely reticulateareolate and partly with striation; third tergite entirely sculptured. Vertex glabrous medially on wide area, with sparse pale setae only laterally. Mesosoma mainly glabrous, with dense short pale setae anteriorly and laterally and with sparse white setae along notauli and median furrow.</p><p>Colour. Head entirely light reddish brown. Prothorax and mesoscutum reddish brown, remaining mesosoma black or partly dark reddish brown. Metasoma entirely black. Antenna dark reddish brown to black, two basal segments yellowish brown. Palpi light reddish brown. Tegula reddish brown. Fore and middle legs brownish yellow; hind leg dark reddish brown to black, apical half of hind femur reddish brown, hind tibia subbasally yellow on short area, third-fifth tarsal segments (except dark pretarsus) yellowish brown. Fore wing faintly infuscate; veins almost black. Pterostigma entirely black.</p><p>Male. Unknown.</p><p>Distribution. Russia (Primorskiy Territory).</p><p>Comparative diagnosis. This new species is very similar to the Eastern Palaearctic H. maetoi Achterberg (Achterberg, 1983), but differs from it in having the short and sparse setae on eyes (without setae in H. maetoi), POL 0.75 × OD (1.3 × in H. maetoi), short temple in dorsal view (long in H. maetoi), recurrent vein of fore wing weakly postfurcal (distinctly postfurcal in H. maetoi), propodeum with more or less distinctly delineated areola (without delineated areola in H. maetoi), metasoma narrow, combined length of second and third tergites 1.5 × their maximum width (wide, their combined length 1.2–1.3 × maximum width in H. maetoi), hind tibia less widened apically, its maximum width 2.6 × minimum width (more widened, its maximum width 3.0 × minimum width in H. maetoi).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/9C0887BE44574762B4C77F0FFF54FED5	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A. (2015): The genus Hylcalosia Fischer, 1967 (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Alysiinae) of the Russian Far East. Zootaxa 4040 (5): 530-542, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4040.5.2
9C0887BE445A4761B4C77F21FC9FFB0D.text	9C0887BE445A4761B4C77F21FC9FFB0D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Hylcalosia sutchanica Belokobylskij 1992	<div><p>Hylcalosia sutchanica Belokobylskij, 1992</p><p>(Figs 29–37)</p><p>Hylcalosia sutchanica Belokobylskij, 1992: 148; 1998: 298; Fischer, 2008: 722; Yu et al., 2012; Zheng et al., 2012: 455. Hylcalosia adsimilis Papp, 1994: 139 (syn. nov.); Belokobylskij, 1998: 298; Fischer, 2008: 722; Yu et al., 2012; Zheng et al., 2012: 455.</p><p>Material examined. Russia. Primorskiy Territory: 2 females (holotype and paratype of H. sutchanica), Russia, “Primorskiy kray, 15 km SZ Partizanska, les, 13 VII 1979, Belokobylskij” (ZISP); 1 female, 1 male, “Primorskiy kray, 10 km V Kavalerovo, les, 2 VIII 1979, Belokobylskij” (ZISP); 1 male, “Primorskiy kray, 29 km SVV Partizanska, les, 9– 10.07.1996, S. Belokobylskij” (ZISP); 2 females, “Primorskiy kray, 10 km YuZ Sokol’chi, Lazovskiy z[apoivedni]k, les, polyany, 22, 24.07.1993, Belokobylskij” (ZISP); 1 female, “Primorskiy kray, okr. Sergeevki, dubnyak, 22 VII 1979, Belokobylskij” (ZISP); 1 female, “Primorie, Evseevka, 20 km YuV Spasska[- Dal’nego], les, 18.07.1991, Belokobylskij” (ZISP); 1 male, “Primorskiy kray, 20 km YuZ Krounovki, sukh.[ie] sklony, 3, 5.08.1993, Belokobylskij" (ZISP); 3 males, “Primorskiy kray, 20 km YuZ Krounovki, les, polyany, 2.– 5.08.1993, Belokobylskij" (ZISP). Amur Province: 1 female, “ Rossiya: Amurskaya oblast', Khinganskiy zapovednik, Kundur, les, polyany, opushki, 17– 20.07.2003, S. Belokobylskij” (ZISP). Korea: 1 female (holotype of H. adsimilis), “ Korea, Kum-gang san, Rükhaam, 10–12.VII.1977 ”, “No. 358—Malaise trap, Dely &amp; Draskovits”, “ Holotypus ♀ Hylcalosia adsimilis sp. n. Papp 1994 ”, “Hym. Typ. No 7548 Mus. Budapest” (HNHM); 1 male, “ South Korea, Bonghwa-gun, Myeongho-myeon, Gwanchang-ri, Mt. Cheongryangsan, 14.VII.2015, E. Tselikh col.” (ZISP).</p><p>Redescription. Female. Body length 2.6–3.2 mm; fore wing length 2.8–3.1 mm.</p><p>Head 1.8–2.1 × wider than median length, 1.5–1.6 × wider than maximum length, 1.5–1.6 × wider than mesoscutum. Vertex without median longitudinal furrow, but with dark median line. Head behind eyes (dorsal view) weakly widened anteriorly, evenly and distinctly narrowed posteriorly. Transverse diameter of eye (dorsal view) 1.4–1.6 × length of temple (1.50–1.75 × if measured in a straight line). Ocelli arranged in triangle with base 1.25–1.35 × longer than its sides, with distinct deep and short furrow between posterior ocelli. POL 0.7–1.0 × OD, 0.3–0.4 × OOL. Eyes with short and rather sparse setae, subround, 1.1 × as high as broad. Face width 1.35–1.45 × height of eye, 2.3–2.4 × median height of face. Clypeus subtriangular, protruding forward, width of clypeus 1.8–2.0 × its median width, 0.4–0.5 × width of face. Mandible distinctly widened towards subapex, its median length 1.4– 1.7 × distal width. Teeth of mandible as on Fig. 32.</p><p>Antennae rather slender, filiform, more than 42-segmented (apical segments missing). Scape 1.2–1.4 × longer than its maximum width. First flagellar segment widest, 1.8–2.2 × longer than its maximum width, 0.80–0.95 × as long as second segment; second segment 3.0–3.5 × longer than apical width. Subapical segments 2.0–2.5 × as long as their maximum width.</p><p>Mesosoma 1.4–1.5 × longer than height. Pronotum with deep and wide pronope. Mesoscutum 0.75–0.85 × as long as maximum width, with deep and short median longitudinal smooth furrow in posterior half. Notauli deep, wide, crenulate, developed only in anterior 0.30–0.35 of mesoscutum, completely absent in posterior 0.65–0.70. Prescutellar depression deep, sparsely rugose or mainly smooth, with high median carina, 0.4–0.5 × as long as scutellum. Scutellum weakly convex, without lateral carinae. Metanotum with median longitudinal carina (dorsal view) transformed to a low flange (lateral view). Sternaulus (precoxal sulcus) wide, deep, entirely coarsely rugosereticulate, fused anteriorly with lower margin of subalar depression, without crenulate furrow from end of sternaulus till middle coxa. Subalar depression shallow, rather wide, rugose-reticulate or weakly rugulose to smooth in upper half. Metapleural flange wide and short. Propodeal spiracles small and round.</p><p>Wings. Fore wing 2.5–2.8 × longer than wide. Pterostigma short and rather narrow, 4.0–4.4 × longer than its maximum width. Radial cell not shortened, metacarp 1.5–1.7 × longer than pterostigma. Radial vein arising distinctly behind middle of pterostigma, from its 0.60–0.65. Inner anterior margin of pterostigma 1.5–1.6 × longer than its inner posterior margin. Second radial abscissa 2.3–2.7 × longer than first abscissa, 0.3 × as long as third abscissa, 0.7–0.8 × as long as first radiomedial vein. Second radiomedial cell 2.6–3.0 × longer than wide, 1.8–2.0 × longer than brachial cell. Recurrent vein postfurcal. Recurrent and basal veins convergent posteriorly. Nervulus almost interstitial or weakly postfurcal. Brachial cell closed apically. Parallel vein arising almost from middle of apical margin of brachial cell. Hind wing 4.8–5.0 × longer than its maximum width. First costal abscissa 0.7–0.8 × as long as second abscissa. First abscissa of mediocubital vein 1.6–1.8 × longer than second abscissa. Recurrent vein weakly postfurcal or interstitial.</p><p>Legs. Hind femur 4.4–4.9 × longer than its maximum width. Hind tarsus almost as long as hind tibia. Hind basitarsus 0.7 × as long as second-fifth segments combined. Second segment of hind tarsus 0.5 × as long as basitarsus, 1.6–1.8 × longer than fifth segment (without pretarsus).</p><p>Metasoma not strongly widened till apex of second tergite, then distinctly and evenly narrowed, apical segments not protruding behind third tergite; metasoma 2.0–2.2 × longer than its maximum width, about 0.9 × as long as head and mesosoma combined. First tergite distinctly and weakly-roundly or almost linearly widened from base to apex, with wide dorsope, with distinct dorsal carinae fused in basal half. Length of first tergite 1.1 × its apical width; apical width 2.1–2.3 × its basal width. Median length of second tergite 1.00–1.05 × its basal width, 0.8–0.9 × its maximum posterior width, 1.5–1.6 × length of third tergite. Second suture shallow and usually at least partly smooth. Second and third tergites with separated laterotergites, its combined length 1.2–1.3 × maximum width. Ovipositor sheath slender, 1.1–1.2 × longer than metasoma, 1.4–1.5 × longer than mesosoma, 0.5–0.6 × as long as fore wing.</p><p>Sculpture and pubescence. Vertex and temple smooth; frons smooth in posterior half and laterally or sometimes laterally finely punctate-areolate, densely rugose in medioanterior half. Face and clypeus entirely densely and coarsely rugose-reticulate with granulation partly. Mesoscutum and scutellum entirely smooth, mesoscutum rugose laterally and anteriorly along its margins, punctate anteriorly on median lobe. Mesopleuron mainly smooth. Propodeum entirely or almost entirely coarsely and densely rugose-areolate with sparse transverse striation, sometimes almost smooth basally, without delineated areola, with distinct carina in mediobasal 0.3. First tergite entirely weakly curvedly or almost linearly and sparsely striate with dense rugulosity, sometimes rugosereticulate medially; second tergite dense or very densely and rather finely striate with reticulation; third tergite almost entirely and rather finely rugulose-reticulate with densely oblique striation at least partly or entirely, almost smooth on narrow or wide posterior margin and laterally. Vertex widely glabrous, with sparse setae laterally, sometimes partly and sparsely setose medially. Mesosoma glabrous, with sparse short setae along notauli and laterally.</p><p>Colour. Head brownish yellow, yellowish brown or reddish brown, darker dorsally. Mesosoma dark reddish brown and partly reddish brown, reddish in some spots. Metasoma reddish brown or dark reddish brown, third tergite sometimes faintly paler. Antenna mainly dark reddish brown to almost black, two-three basal segments yellow. Palpi yellow to pale yellow apically. Tegula light brown or light reddish brown. Legs yellow to brownish yellow, hind tibia and tarsus brown, but hind tibia basally yellow or yellowish. Fore wing faintly or very faintly infuscate; veins brown or dark brown. Pterostigma brown, faintly paler basally and apically.</p><p>Male. Body length 2.1–2.8 mm; fore wing length 2.2–3.0 mm. Antenna 41-segmented, 1.8–2.0 × longer than body. Pterostigma weakly thickened. Metasoma narrow, its apical segments more or less distinctly protruding behind third tergite, 2.4–2.7 × longer than its maximum width. Length of first tergite 1.1–1.2 × its apical width. Sometimes body darker. Otherwise similar to female.</p><p>Distribution. Russia (Primorskiy Territory, *Amur Province), North Korea.</p><p>Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to H. hymaenei Belokobylskij, but differs from it in having the notauli developed only in the anterior third of mesoscutum, median mesoscutal depression short, metasoma narrow, first metasomal tergites weakly widened apically, second and third tergites narrow, finely and densely striate with reticulation, and body mainly dark reddish brown (see also key to species below).</p><p>Remarks. Study and direct comparison of the type material of H. sutchanica and H. adsimilis distinctly showed their affiliation to single species (syn. nov.). Previously listed differences between these forms (see: Papp, 1994; Belokobylskij, 1998; Fischer, 2008) were results of the interspecies variability of some features or unclear their designations in the original description of H. adsimilis .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/9C0887BE445A4761B4C77F21FC9FFB0D	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A. (2015): The genus Hylcalosia Fischer, 1967 (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Alysiinae) of the Russian Far East. Zootaxa 4040 (5): 530-542, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4040.5.2
9C0887BE44594766B4C77B56FA3BFCA5.text	9C0887BE44594766B4C77B56FA3BFCA5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Hylcalosia	<div><p>Key to all known species of the genus Hylcalosia</p><p>1. Notauli completely absent in posterior 0.5–0.7 of mesoscutum (Figs 9, 34). Second metasomal tergite much longer than third tergite (Figs 12, 13, 37). Palpi longer, almost reached hind coxa................................................ 2</p><p>- Notauli present in posterior half of mesoscutum, but sometimes shallow, fused with median furrow before posterior margin of mesoscutum (Fig. 21). Second metasomal tergite about equal to third tergite (Fig. 28). Palpi shorter, not reached hind coxa..................................................................................................... 4</p><p>2. Second and third metasomal tergites with wide and shallow median longitudinal groove.—Transverse diameter of eye (dorsal view) about 1.5 × length of temple. First metasomal tergite as long as apical width. Ovipositor sheath 0.7 × as long as fore wing. Body length 2.6–3.1 mm.— China (Heilongjiang)..................... H. ventisulcata Zheng, Chen et Yang, 2012</p><p>- Second and third metasomal tergites without median longitudinal groove, rarely only with narrow smooth stripe.......... 3</p><p>3. Notauli reached middle of mesopleuron (dorsal view) (Fig. 9). Median mesoscutal furrow long (Fig. 9). Second and third metasomal tergites usually wide, with coarse and rather sparse striation (Fig. 12). Head yellow or brownish yellow, mesosoma and metasoma usually light reddish brown at least partly (Fig. 1). Body length 2.2–3.0 mm.— Russia: Primorskiy Territory, Evreyskaya Province, Amur Province........................................... H. hymaenei Belokobylskij, 1992</p><p>- Notauli reached anterior third of mesopleuron (dorsal view) (Fig. 34). Median mesoscutal furrow short (Fig. 34). Second and third metasomal tergites usually narrow, with rather fine and dense striation (Fig. 37). Body mainly dark reddish brown (Fig. 29). Body length 2.1–3.2 mm.— Russia: Primorskiy Territory, Amur Province; North and South Korea ...................................................................... H. sutchanica Belokobylskij, 1992 ( H. adsimilis Papp, 1994)</p><p>4(1). Transverse diameter of eye (dorsal view) 1.6 × length of temple. Recurrent vein weakly antefurcal. Palpi reaching middle coxa. Head blackish brown, mesosoma and first and second metasomal tergites yellowish. Body length 4.1 mm.— Indonesia (Sumatra)...................................................................... H. hemiflava van Achterberg, 1983</p><p>- Transverse diameter of eye (dorsal view) 0.7–1.1 × length of temple. Recurrent vein postfurcal. Palpi far not reaching middle coxa. Head reddish or brown, mesosoma and metasoma black or dark reddish brown, sometimes mainly brown (except H. lao-</p><p>sensis Fischer)...................................................................................... 5 5. Temple distinctly (in 1.3–1.5 ×) longer than transverse diameter of eye (dorsal view). Median length of second metasomal tergite subequal to its maximum width........................................................................ 6</p><p>- Temple about as long as transverse diameter of eye (dorsal view). Median length of second metasomal tergite distinctly less than its maximum width................................................................................ 7</p><p>6. Distal upper lobe of mandible with two narrow and short teeth. Medioposterior furrow of mesoscutum distinctly longer than half of mesoscutum. First to third metasomal tergites longitudinally striate. Third tergite with medio-posterior groove. First metasomal tergite 1.5 × its apical width. Body length 6.1 mm.— Myanmar .............. H. ruficeps (Cameron, 1910) (♂)</p><p>- Distal upper lobe of mandible with single wide and long teeth. Medioposterior furrow of mesoscutum not longer than half of mesoscutum. First to third metasomal tergites reticulate-striate. Third tergite without medio-posterior groove. First metasomal tergite not longer than its apical width. Body length 6.1 mm.— China (Fujian)......... H. complexus Chen et Wu, 1994 (♀)</p><p>7. Sternaulus incomplete, irregularly rugose, but smooth before mesopleural furrow. Lower part of mesosoma sparsely setose. Mesosoma, first and most part of second metasomal tergites yellow. Body length 6.1 mm.— Laos ................................................................................................... H. laosensis Fischer, 2008 (♂)</p><p>- Sternaulus complete, entirely crenulate. Lower part of mesosoma densely setose. Mesosoma and metasoma black or partly dark reddish brown................................................................................... 8</p><p>8. Eyes without setae. POL 1.0–1.3 × OD. Transverse diameter of eye almost equal to length of temple (dorsal view). Recurrent vein of fore wing distinctly postfurcal. Propodeum without delineated areola. Metasoma wide, combined length of second and third tergites 1.2–1.3 × their maximum width. Hind tibia distinctly widened apically, its maximum width about 3.0 × minimum width. Body length 5.3–7.2 mm.— Japan (Kyushu, Honshu), South Korea (new record)....... H. maetoi Achterberg, 1983</p><p>- Eye with short and sparse setae. POL 0.75 × OD (Fig. 15). Transverse diameter of eye 1.3 × length of temple (dorsal view) (Fig. 15). Recurrent vein of fore wing weakly postfurcal (Fig. 25). Propodeum with more or less distinctly delineated areola (Fig. 26). Metasoma narrow, combined length of second and third tergites 1.5 × their maximum width (Fig. 28). Hind tibia less widened apically, its maximum width 2.6 × minimum width. Body length 6.0 mm.— Russia (Primorskiy Territory).............................................................................................. H. livadiae sp. nov.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/9C0887BE44594766B4C77B56FA3BFCA5	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A. (2015): The genus Hylcalosia Fischer, 1967 (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Alysiinae) of the Russian Far East. Zootaxa 4040 (5): 530-542, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4040.5.2
